ebook img

Acidic Proteins of the Nucleus PDF

348 Pages·1974·7.229 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Acidic Proteins of the Nucleus

This is a volume in CELL BIOLOGY A series of monographs Editors: D. E. Buetow, I. L. Cameron, and G. M. Padilla A complete list of the books in this series appears at the end of the volume. Acidic Proteins of the Nucleus Edited by IVAN L. CAMERON Department of Anatomy University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio, Texas JAMES R. JETER, Jr. McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research University of Wisconsin Medical Center Madison, Wisconsin ACADEMIC PRESS New York San Francisco London 1974 A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers COPYRIGHT © 1974, BY ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Ill Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10003 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (LONDON) LTD. 24/28 Oval Road, London NW1 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cameron, Ivan L Acidic proteins of the nucleus. (Cell biology series) Includes bibliographies. 1. Nucleoproteins. 2. Cell nuclei. I. Jeter, James R.Joint author. II. Title. [DNLM: 1. Cell nucleus. 2. Cytology. 3. Proteins. QH595 A181] QH595.C32 574.8'732 74-5691 ISBN 0-12-156930-6 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA List of Contributors Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors' contributions begin. Vincent G. Allfrey ( 1 ), The Rockefeller University, New York, New York H. D. Betendes (191), Department of Genetics University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Ivan L. Cameron (213), Department of Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas Arthur Forer (159), Biology Department, York University, Downs- view, Ontario, Canada R. Stewart Gilmour (297), The Beatson Institute for Cancer Re- search, Glasgow, Scotland P. J. Helmsing (191), Department of Genetics, University of Nijme- gen, The Netherlands James R. Jeter, Jr. (213), McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical Center, Madison, Wisconsin Lewis J. Kleinsmith (103), Department of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan Wattace M. LeStourgeon (59, 159), Department of Molecular Biol- ogy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee ix χ List of Contributors Bruce E. Magun (137), Department of Anatomy, University of Ten- nessee Medical Unit, Memphis, Tennessee Gordhan L. Patel (29), Department of Zoology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Thomas C. Spelsberg (247), Department of Endocrine Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Roger Totten (159), Department of Plant Pathology, Montana State College, Bozeman, Montana Wayne Wray (59), Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas Preface The nucleus is the central repository of genetic information within the cell, and this genetic information is encoded in a sequence of deoxyribonucleotides. Each somatic cell nucleus of an organism con- tains the same complete compliment of genetic material except in a few clearly defined cases where some specific chromosomes are dis- carded during somatic cell differentiation, as occurs in the gall midge and in ascaris. It has become apparent that only a small part of this total genetic information is expressed in any given cell at any given time. How is the transcription of this genetic information controlled? Many feel this to be the most exciting question in mod- ern biology. This question has led many workers to suggest that the nuclear proteins are the regulators of genetic expression in cells. During the early 1940's Edgar and Ellen Stedman at Edinburgh revived interest in the nucleoproteins, particularly the histones, as possible repressors of specific chromosomal genes. Information con- cerning the histones is nicely summarized in a series of monographs (A. Kossal, "The Portamines and Histones," Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1928; J. Bonner and P.O.P. Ts'o, eds., "The Nucleo- histones," Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1964; H. Busch, "Histones and Other Nuclear Proteins," Academic Press, New York, 1965; D. M. P. Phillips, ed., "Histones and Nucleohistones," Plenum, Lon- don, 1971; and L. S. Hnilica, "The Structure and Functions of His- tones," The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, 1972). Despite a wealth of information on the chemistry and structure of histones it has been disappointing to find that these proteins have only a limited and nonspecific role in the regulation of genetic expression. It also seems clear that this group of proteins has limited hetero- geneity and has remained virtually unchanged during the evolution of eukaryotic cells. Consequently, interest in the histones as specific regulators of genetic expression has waned. More recently interest has turned to the heterogeneous group of nucleoproteins which the xi xii Preface Stedmans called "chromosomin." Recent workers refer to these heterogeneous proteins as the nonhistone or the acidic nuclear pro- teins, and it is felt by many that some of the proteins in this group act as regulators of the expression of specific genes. It is now clear that many of these proteins also play structural, enzymatic, mobility, receptor, and probably other roles in the nucleus. To strongly distinguish this group of nuclear proteins from the histones we have chosen to refer to them as acidic nuclear proteins rather than nonhistone nuclear proteins even though we feel, as do most of the workers in the field, that these terms are equitable. Historically these proteins were referred to as acidic in nature be- cause they were insoluble in dilute mineral acids and their amino acid composition showed a preponderance of acidic over basic amino acid residues. However, isoelectric foscusing data have shown that a few of these proteins are actually basic rather than acidic in nature, therefore it is probably more correct to refer to the whole group as nonhistone rather than acidic proteins. Because of the large and growing interest in the acidic nuclear proteins we decided that it would be worthwhile to bring to- gether into one monograph the diverse and scattered information on this topic. Although it seems of considerable value to collate information in a rapidly growing field, we are only too aware that this monograph is doomed to obsolescence. Nevertheless, we are hopeful that the book will stand as a notable historical landmark in the field. This work gives a broad account of much of what is presently known of the acidic nuclear proteins. Although some of the chapters deal with various approaches for isolating, separating, and charac- terizing these proteins, much of the book is directed toward eluci- dating the functional role that these nuclear proteins may play in differential gene expression. At present a variety of techniques is used by many of the laboratories investigating these proteins. Tak- ing into account the way the histone story developed we feel that firm conclusions about the role of the acidic nuclear proteins will not be possible until there are accepted standard high-resolution techniques for the study of these proteins. The contributors to this book are all active and eminent re- searchers in their field. Each chapter contains some previously un- published work and points the way to new and promising areas Preface xiii for future research. We feel that this monograph will serve as a good reference background to the acidic nuclear proteins and will stimulate researchers to unravel the exciting questions concerning the role of these proteins. Ivan L. Cameron James R. Jeter, Jr. I DNA-Binding Proteins and Transcriptional Control in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Systems VINCENT G. ALLFREY I. Introduction 2 A. The Problem of Differential Transcription 2 B. Involvement of DNA-Associated Proteins 2 C. Histones and Chromatin Structure 2 II. Transcriptional Control in Prokaryotes—A Model for Higher Organisms 3 A. The he Repressor 4 B. Repression of the hut Operons in Salmonella 6 C. The Lambda Repressor 7 D. Rho Factor—Geometry of the Functional Oligomers .. 8 Ε Positive Transcriptional Control by DNA-Binding Proteins 9 F. Low Molecular Weight RNA Initiation Proteins in E. coli " 11 G. DNΑ-Unwinding Proteins 11 III. Transcriptional Control by Modification of RNA Polymerases ... 12 IV. Nuclear Nonhistone Proteins and Transcriptional Control in Eukaryotes 13 A. Correlations with Gene Activity 13 B. Specificity in DNA-Binding by Nuclear Nonhistone Proteins 15 C. Species-Selective DNA Binding 16 D. Sequence-Specific DNA Binding 17 E. Transcription of Unique and Repetitive DNA Sequences 20 F. Protein Phosphorylation and Gene Activation 21 References 21 ι 2 Vincent G. Allfrey I. INTRODUCTION A. The Problem of Differential Transcription The process of cell differentiation, leading to the diversity of special- ized cells in higher organisms, involves a selective transcription of different regions of the total chromosomal DNA to produce the RNA pop- ulations characteristic of different cell types. This selective, but partial utilization of the genome occurs despite the presence in most diploid somatic cells of a complete array of chromosomes and a DNA comple- ment sufficient to specify the formation of an entire organism (1). It is now clear that individual cells suppress the transcription of most of their DNA (2) while they selectively activate a relatively small num- ber of genes necessary for the synthesis, assembly, processing, and post- synthetic modification of enzymes and structural proteins characteristic of the cell type and the species. This is evident in the limited nature of their RNA transcripts ( 2-4 ). In the course of embryonic development and aging, different sets of genes are activated or repressed in response to programmed signals from the nucleus, the cytoplasm, the cell mem- brane, and the environment. B. Involvement of DNA-Associated Proteins The two aspects of transcriptional control—suppression of the template activity of most of the DNA and activation of RNA synthesis at particular genetic loci—require the participation of proteins associated with the chromatin complex. These proteins influence the structure of the genetic material, strengthen or weaken its interactions with RNA polymerases, and transmit physiological control signals for gene activation or repres- sion in response to hormones, cyclic nucleotides, and other types of stimuli. The main protein fractions concerned with structure and function of chromatin include the histones—the basic suppressive components of chromatin—and the more acidic nuclear proteins involved in positive and selective aspects of genetic control. C. Histones and Chromatin Structure Speculations on the regulatory role of histones date back to Edgar and Ellen Stedman who, in 1950, proposed that "the basic proteins of cell nuclei are gene inhibitors, each histone or protamine being capable

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.