A - Z of Medical Writing PDF
Preview A - Z of Medical Writing
AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page i THE A-Z OF MEDICAL WRITING AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page ii Tim Albert learnt the long words studying psychology and the short ones as a Daily Mirror trainee. He then worked for the broadsheets and the BBC and was education correspondent of the New Statesman. Rampant hypochondriasis steered him into medical journalism, and he was executive editor of World Medicine and editor of BMA News Review. Since 1990 he has run his own training company, delivering hundreds of courses on writing to doctors and other health profes- sionals. He is a fellow of the Institute of Personnel and Development, organiser of the BMJ’s annual short course for journal editors, and visiting fellow in medical writing at Southampton University. AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page iii THE A-Z OF MEDICAL WRITING Tim Albert Tim Albert Training, Surrey, UK BMJ Books AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page iv © BMJ Books 2000 BMJ Books is an imprint of the BMJ Publishing Group All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publishers. First published in 2000 by BMJ Books, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR www.bmjbooks.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-7279-1487-1 Typeset by Saxon Graphics, Derby Printed and bound in Great Britain by J W Arrowsmith Ltd, Bristol AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page v Contents Foreword vii How to use this book ix The A–Z of Medical Writing 1 AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page vii Foreword This book has not been written to be read – at least in the usual sense of starting at the beginning, ploughing on to the end, and then remembering (at best) one or two points. I have written it for a completely different purpose, which has come from my experiences over the past 10 years working with doctors and other health profes- sionals to sort out a wide range of writing problems. It is clear that they face several difficulties when it comes to writing. They are torn between the pressure to communicate with patients on the one hand, and meet the expectations of their peers for horrendously prolix prose on the other. Although they will have had no formal training on writing since they were 16, they will be expected to publish in high status journals if they are to advance in their careers. Writing cultures have grown up that are, frankly, destructive of effective communication and individual talent. And of course, as trained doctors rather than trained writers, they have more useful things to do anyway. So this is not another reference book laying down rules on grammar, style, or journalology, or the presentation of statistics or the ethics of publication, even though I stray into these areas from time to time. What this book sets out to do is to give support, encour- agement, and informed advice, so that people who have found writing hard will somehow find it less hard. Acting on the experience of training courses, I have chosen a large number of topics, which are arranged alphabetically, from abbreviationsto zzzzz. Tim Albert vii AtoZprel.qxd 22/02/00 13:49 Page ix How to use this book I expect this book to be used in two ways. The first is as an old- fashioned companion, to be kept by a bedside or on a desk, so that you can dip into it during an otherwise idle moment and find the odd entry that will interest, amuse, stimulate or annoy. The second is to use it for advice and encouragement when you have a specific writing problem. You have been asked to write an obituary, for instance, or you are suffering from writer’s block. In such cases, you should turn to the specific entry, which in turn should guide you to other related entries, and in some cases to details of books that I have on my book- shelf and find useful. A word in bold typeshows that there is another section also of use. This book, as the title makes clear, is a personal choice, and I am sure that many topics could have been dealt with differently, and that some important ones have been left out altogether. I hope that this book will evolve, and that we shall be able to make regular updates, both in the paper version and in electronic form. To that end I hope that readers will send me their comments, including suggestions for new items to be covered in the next edition, and other pieces of advice and comment. Finally I would like to thank all those who have helped, in their various ways, with this book. These are Gordon Macpherson, Harvey Marcovitch, Pete Moore, Geoff Watts, Geert-Jan van Daal, Don Rowntree, Margaret Hallendorff, Mary Banks and Michèle Clarke. The person who has suffered most for my art, as always, has been my wife Barbara, to whom I offer my special thanks. Tim Albert Dorking [email protected] ix AtoZtext.qxd 22/02/00 13:51 Page 1 ABBREVIATIONS A–Z of Medical Writing Abbreviations Modern science writing is written increas- ingly in a kind of code, littered with phrases such as ‘a breakthrough in PE’ and ‘no laboratory monitoring of APT’. Proponents argue that this is inevitable; it reflects the increasing specialization of medicine and saves valuable space for yet more papers. Opponents say that abbreviations mislead and confuse. One person’s British Medical Association will be another’s British Midland Airways, or (as I once saw in a conference hotel in America) a Branch Marketing Assistant. The initials CIA are identified so closely with US spies that it may be difficult to remember that they also stand for common iliac arteries. The confusion intensifies when the abbrevia- tions disappear for a while, only to resurface after an absence of several paragraphs when you have completely forgotten what they stand for. For this reason, and because they are in upper case, they slow the reader down. They also send a strong message to the reader: this is our language, if you are uncomfortable with it, you don’t belong. Those who want to avoid abbreviations can usually do so, for instance by spelling out in full one of the component words: ‘the association’, ‘the airline’ or ‘the assistant’. If you do insist on using abbreviations, make sure that you spell out the words in full at their first appearance, and try to use no more than two sets per document (seeacronyms; political writing). Absolutes Many people use phrases such as ‘absolute perfection’ and ‘completely exhausted’, where the first word is redundant (though not ‘totally redundant’!). See alsotautology. Abstracts There are two types of abstracts. There are those that stand on their own, as a means of securing an invitation to present at a conference. I call these conference abstracts and they have an entry to themselves (seebelow). The other type are those that appear at the start of a scientific paper, summarizing the information contained in that paper. According to the Vancouver Group, an abstract should state the purposes of the study or investigation, basic procedures, main findings, and the prin- cipal conclusions: ‘It should emphasize new and important aspects of the study or observation’. In some respects they are a marketing tool, 1 AtoZtext.qxd 22/02/00 13:51 Page 2 – THEA ZOFMEDICALWRITING enabling potential readers to decide whether they should read the paper in detail. With the development of electronic databases, they now have a role as a stand-alone unit of scientific knowledge. Approach writing an abstract in the same way as you would approach any other writing task (seeprocess of writing). Don’t just try to cut your article back to fit the space available, but treat this as a separate piece of writing. There are two pitfalls to avoid. • Ignoring the specifications. Journals will make it absolutely clear in the Instructions to Authorshow they like their abstract to appear, and it is senseless to ignore these requirements. A modern trend is the structured abstract, which has carefully defined sections to complete. Study the instructions carefully, and look at abstracts in your target journal. One of the most commonly flouted require- ments is length: if they say 300 words they mean 300 words; any more may be cut and your work could become meaningless. • Deviating from the original. It is not hard to find examples of submitted (and sometimes published) articles where details in the abstract simply do not appear in the article itself. This danger is particularly acute when the abstract has been written first. By the time the paper has been written and the co-authors have agreed, all kind of subtle changes have been made. Acceptance The supreme moment when something you have written is accepted for publication. Treasure it. Acknowledgements According to the Vancouver Group these are the statements accompanying a scientific paper that ‘specify (a) contributions that do not justify authorship, such as general support by a department chair, (b) acknowledgements of technical help, (c) acknowledgements of financial and material support, which should specify the nature of the support; and (d) relationships that may pose a conflict of interest’. Naming people in this way assumes that they endorse the contents, so you must have their written permission. Technical help should be acknowledged in a separate paragraph. Journals will vary in their approach to this (see Instructions to Authors). The word can have a slightly different meaning when it comes to books. In such instances it is used to acknowledge Copyrightmaterial. 2
The list of books you might like
