ebook img

A survey of Montanans' beliefs about hunting, viewing, and trapping PDF

80 Pages·1995·3.4 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview A survey of Montanans' beliefs about hunting, viewing, and trapping

MONTANASTATELIBRARY SA6s3u9r.v1eyFo2fsMmobnhta1n9a9n5sc'.1beMliceCfoslalboouugthhun 30864000959307 ASURVEYOFMONTANANS'BELIEFS ABOUTHUNTING,VIEWING,ANDTRAPPING ScottA.McCoUough,GaryL.Dusek,andDanaE.Dolsen MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks August1995 JOBCOMPLETIONREPORT StateofMontana ProjectNo.:W-lOO-R-7 ProjectTitle: WildlifeProgrammaticEIS JobTitle: AsurveyofMontanans' beliefsabouthunting, viewingandtrapping Preparedby: ScottA.McCoUough Approvedby: DonA.Childress GaryL.Dusek DanaE.Dolsen Date: August21, 1995 J ABSTRACT Wildlifemanagementagenciestypicallyusepublicmeetingsandlicense-holdersurveystoobtain publicinput.Thesetechniquesareeffectiveingatheringcommentsfromhunters,trappers,major landowners, and wildlifeorganizations butmaypreclude feedbackfrom others. Given the interestinwildlifeissuesthroughoutMontana, Fish,WildlifeandParks(MFWP)designeda study to sampleall Montanans beliefs aboutwildlife-related recreation. MFWPbegan this surveybyusingfocusgroupstodevelop"beliefstatements". Interviewersthenphonedrandomly selected households, read these statements and associated questions, and noted responses. Respondentsgenerallyshowedstrongsupportforhuntingandahighlevelofinterestinwildlife viewing. Theydemonstratedlittlefamiliaritywithtrapping. Chi-squaretestingshowedthat beliefs, gender, and participation were often interrelated. Tests for nonresponse bias and comparisonsto 1990Censusfiguressuggestthatthesurveydidnotachievetheobjectiveof sampling Montana's overall population. The majordifferencebetween the sampleandthe populationmaybethesample'slargeproportionofhuntersandviewers. Theresultscontained hereincouldbeusedtodevelopwildlifemanagementstrategiesfocusedonhuntersandviewers andtodescribetherecreationalenvironmentinMFWP'senvironmentalimpactstatementonits WildlifeProgram. TABLEOFCONTENTS INTRODUCTION BEenlviierfosnSmuernvtealyImpactStatementfortheWildlifeProgram 2j1 REVIEWOFTHELITERATURE 3 Results Montana •••• ^2 Colorado •• • ^ National 4 Methods g METHODS jQ SurveyofMontanaResidents jq FocusGroups jq BeliefStatementsandInterviews 10 NonresponseBiasandUSCensusComparisons 11 RelationshipsamongVariables U RESULTSANDDISCUSSION 12 BeliefsHunting •••• j2 HuntingRegulations Ig WildlifeViewing 20 Trapping 27 Participation 2^ Hunting ^2 WildlifeViewing 34 Trapping 34 RSealmaptlioensChhairpasctAemriosntigcsVariables ^5 GenderandBeliefs ParticipationandBelief 4q ParticipationandGender 4j ParticipationandSocialandDemographicFactors 41 SampleQuality 42 NonresponseBias •••• Sample/USCensusComparisons 4g CONCLUSIONSANDSUMMARY 5q REFERENCESCITED ^2 APPENDIXA 54 APPENDIXB .... 62 LISTOFTABLES Table1. Kellertattitudesof314Montanarespondents,1991 3 Table2. ResourceallocationopinionsofrespondentsonMFWP'swildlifemanagement, 1991. Samplesizerangedfrom347to389 4 Table3. Significant chi-square relationships among the characteristics of Montana respondentsandtheirparticipationinhuntingandviewing, 1991. Samplesize rangedfrom390to399 5 Table4. DemographiccharacteristicsofrespondentsinMFWP's1991survey. Sample sizerangedfrom359to395 6 Table5. Responses ofthe Colorado public to statements about wildlifeand wildlife management, 1991(900respondents) 7 Table6. ParticipationratesoftheUSpopulationinhuntingandnonconsumptivewildlife uses,1991-1992 g Table7. Significantrelationshipsbetweensocialanddemographicfactorsandrespondents' participationinhuntingandwildlifeviewing,1993.(Determinedbychi-square testing,wherep<0.05) 41 Table8. Summarystatisticsfornonresponsebiasandfullsamplechi-square comparisons (95%level) 43 Table9. Residencein1985:StateandCountyLevel(Persons5years&older) 48 LISTOFFIGURES Figure1. Relationshipsamongcognitiveareas 2 Figure2. TheopportunitytohuntshouldnotbetakenawayfromMontanans 12 Figure3. DoyouapproveordisapproveofeffortstoabolishhuntinginMontana? 13 Figure4. HuntingisanimportantculturaltraditioninMontana 13 Figure5. HuntingisasociallyacceptablerecreationalpursuitforfamiliesinMontana.... 13 Figure6. Withoutinformationfromhunterharvests, itwouldbeextremelydifficultto managewildlife j4 Figure7. Managinganimalnumberstoimprovehuntingisacceptable 14 Figure8. Huntingkeepsagriculturalcropsand/orforagefrombeingseverelydamagedby wildlife J5 FFiigguurree91.0. HAunmtajionrgitiyn,stoavteerp5ar0ksperisceunnta,ccoefpthaubnlteersiniMnoMnotnatnaanawoundanimalsanddonot 15 retrievethem J5 Figure11. Gameanimalskilledbyhuntingreplacesnaturalmortality 16 Figure12. Hunting is not acceptable if those animals would otherwise be killed by predators Figure13. Thehuntingofprivatelyowned,confinedwildlife(likegamefarmanimals)is unacceptableinMontana 15 Figure14. Somepredatorpopulations,suchasmountainlions,shouldbecontrolledthrough huntingbecausetheirpreyspeciesarelimited 17 Figure15. Nongamespecies, such astheprairiedog,shouldnotbehuntedunlessthey threatenpeople'slivelihood,safety,orhealth 17 Figure16. Huntingpreventsanimalpopulationsfrommaintainingamorenaturalageand sexcomposition jg Figure17. Huntingimproveshighwaysafetybyreducingthepotentialforanimal-vehicle collisions jg Figure18. ThecomplexityofMontana'shuntingregulationsdiscouragesparticipationinthis Figure19. aHcotiwvitiymportantaresocio-politicalconsiderationsforMFWPinsettinghunting jg regulations? Figure20. How important are biological considerations for MFWP in setting hunting Figure21. Hreoguwlaitmipoonrs?tantareeconomicinfluencesonsettinghuntingregulations? 2j0g FFiigguurree2232.. EWinladblliifnegvciheiwlidnrgenistoavwioerwthwwihldilliefereicsraeagtiooondalwpauyrstuoitedfuocraMteontthaenmaafbaomuitlineastur.e..... 2210 Figure24. Theabundanceanddiversityofwildlifespeciesyouobservereflectsthehealth ofthenaturalenvironment 21 Figure25. Educatingpeopleabouttheirroleinthenaturalenvironmentispossiblethrough wildlifeviewing 21 Figure26. Feedingwildlifeinordertoviewthemmaybeharmfultothoseanimals 22 Figure27. ViewingandbeinginterestedinwildlifeareprimaryreasonswhyIenjoybeing inMontana 22 Figure28. Personalobservationsovertheyearsoflowernumbersorfewerwildlifespecies Figure29. wMoFulWdPdeschroeualsdeeymopuhraseinzjeoytmheenitmpoofrltiafencienoMfonwitladnliafehabitattootheragenciesto 23 increaseviewingopportunitiesonpublicland 23

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.