Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) A Steady-state Analysis of PWM SEPIC Converter ELENA NICULESCU, DORINA-MIOARA PURCARU and M. C. NICULESCU Departments of Electronics and Instrumentation, and Mechatronics University of Craiova Al. I. Cuza Street, No. 13, Craiova, RO-200585 ROMANIA Abstract: - The paper presents a unified steady-state analysis of PWM SEPIC converter with coupled inductors and separate inductors for both continuous and discontinuous conduction modes. The results of this simplified analysis allow to determine the operating point of converters and further the small-signal low-frequency parameters of linear model, and to design the converter too. The expressions of all steady-state properties of converter take the effects of inductor coupling into account. The converter with separate inductors is treated as a particular case of the more general coupled-inductor case. Key-Words: - Coupled and non-coupled inductor PWM SEPIC Converter, Steady-state analysis 1 Introduction make a simplified analysis of coupled-inductor SEPIC converter avoiding magnetics theory. As it is well known, the PWM converters are nonlinear dynamic systems with structural changes Nomenclature over an operation cycle: two for the continuous conduction mode (CCM) and three for the iL1 = current through L1 discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). Coupled i = ripple component of i 1 L1 inductor techniques can be applied to PWM SEPIC I = initial and final condition of i L01 L1 converter operating either with CCM or DCM to I = average value of i achieve low-ripple input current [1], [2], [3]. L1D 1 The paper provides a complete steady-state IL1 = average value of iL2 characterization for coupled-inductor PWM SEPIC i = current through L L2 2 converter with both CCM and DCM. The converter i = ripple component of i 2 L2 with separate inductors is treated as a particular case I = initial and final condition of i of the more general coupled-inductor case. In L02 L2 I = average value of i Section II, the steady-state analysis of PWM SEPIC L2D 2 converter with CCM is made. The expressions of I = average value of i L2 L2 average input and output currents, output voltage and I = average output current O voltage across energy storage capacitor, which take i = current through switch the effects of inductor coupling into account, are S i = current through diode derived here. The same steady-state properties of D PWM SEPIC converter with DCM are derived in V = dc input voltage I Section III. The boundary equation is given in v = output voltage O Section IV. Simplified mathematical models for the v = voltage across L steady-state behavior of converter with CCM and L1 1 v = voltage across L DCM have been obtained as result of this analysis. L2 2 The analysis is based on the equations written on V = average voltage across C C1 1 the circuit for each time interval corresponding to D = switch-on duty cycle 1 states of switches (transistor and diode) and the low- D = diode-on duty cycle ripple capacitor voltages, and the waveforms of 2 D = switch and diode off ratio electrical quantities corresponding to operating mode 3 of the converter. The analysis and modelling of f = switching frequency s SEPIC converter has surfaced in many forms over L = inductance of filtering inductor L 1 1 the years [1] – [5]. The purpose of this paper is to Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) L = inductance of filtering inductor L and diode, average voltage across the energy storage 2 2 capacitor C . L = mutual inductance 1 M As it can be seen from the inductor current k = coupling coefficient c waveforms shown in Fig. 3a and d, the ripple n = turn ratio component i respectively i is superposed over the 1 2 C = capacity of energy storage capacitor C 1 1 dc component I respectively I that represent L01 L02 C = capacity of output filtering capacitor C 2 2 the initial and final condition of inductor current in R = load resistance L respectively L : 1 2 h = conversion efficiency of converter i =i +I (1) M = dc voltage conversion ratio L1 1 L01 i =i +I (2) L2 2 L02 2 Steady-state Analysis of SEPIC Converter with CCM The diagram of conventional PWM SEPIC converter with coupled inductors is given in Fig. 1a. The topology shown in Fig. 1b is another structure of PWM SEPIC converter with coupled inductors and identical operating behaviour as that in Fig. 1a. This one clearly highlights the PWM switch and the possibility to use the PWM switch model with all its benefits [6]. As compared to the conventional SEPIC topology, the control of the switch has to be realized potential free with respect to the potential reference in the second topology. Fig.2 Equivalent circuits for: a. two coupled Assume that the converter operates in continuous inductors; b. SEPIC topology with coupled inductors conduction mode and that the two inductors are magnetically coupled together to reduce the input In order to determine the average values of the current ripple and increase the power density. The current components, we need to find di / dt and equivalent circuit of two coupled inductors is given 1 in Fig. 2a, and the waveforms of inductor currents di / dt firstly. The input and output voltages as 2 and voltages are shown in Fig. 3, where D =1-D . well as the voltage across the energy storage 2 1 capacitor C are supposed without ripple. Based on 1 the equivalent circuit of two coupled inductors in Fig. 2a, we have di di v =L 1 +L 2 (3) L1 1 dt M dt di di v =L 1 +L 2 . (4) L2 M dt 2 dt Solving for the unknowns di / dt and di / dt, we 1 2 find di v L v L 1 = L1 2 - L2 M (5) dt L L -L2 L L -L2 1 2 M 1 2 M di v L v L 2 = L2 1 - L1 M (6) dt L L -L2 L L -L2 1 2 M 1 2 M Fig.1 Two SEPIC PWM converter topologies with After some algebra, the previous equations can be coupled inductors written as di v -k v / n 1 = L1 c L2 (7) The target of this analysis is that to find the dt (1-k2)L c 1 expressions of dc voltage conversion ratio, average di v -k nv inductor currents, average currents through switch 2 = L2 c L1 (8) ( ) dt 1-k2 L c 2 Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) For 0£t £DT , substituting the inductor voltages vL1 1 s v =V and v =V into (7) and (8) yield: D T D T L1 I L2 C1 1 s 2 s di V -k V / n 1 = I c C1 (9) ( ) VI dt 1-kc2 L1 a . di V -k nV 2 = C1 c I . (10) 0 T t ( ) s dt 1-k2 L VO c 2 We proceed similarly for DT £t£T when 1 s s v =V -V -V and v =-V , and we obtain: L1 I C1 O L2 O iL1 di V -V -V +k V / n 1 = I C1 O c O (11) ( ) dt 1-k2 L c 1 I di V +k n(V -V -V ) b . L01 2 =- O c I C1 O . (12) 0 t dt (1-kc2)L2 Since the total rise of i and respectively i 1 2 i1 D1TsVI (cid:1) during 0£t£D1Ts must to be equal to the total fall L IL1D 1e of the same currents during D1Ts £t£Ts, we have: (cid:6)di (cid:3) (cid:6) di (cid:3) c . 0 t D1Ts(cid:4)(cid:5)dt1(cid:1)(cid:2) =(1-D1)Ts(cid:4)(cid:5)- dt1(cid:1)(cid:2) (13) 0£t£D1Ts D1Ts£t£Ts vL2 (cid:6)di (cid:3) (cid:6) di (cid:3) D1Ts(cid:4)(cid:5) dt2(cid:1)(cid:2) =(1-D1)Ts(cid:4)(cid:5)- dt2(cid:1)(cid:2) . (14) 0£t£D1Ts D1Ts£t£Ts V The substitution of (9), (10) and (11), (12) into I (13) and (14) yields the steady-state relationships d. 0 t between the dc input voltage and the average output V voltage, and the average voltage across the energy O storage capacitor C1: DV V =V and V = 1 I . i C1 I O 1-D L2 1 From these results, the dc voltage conversion ratio of coupled-inductor PWM SEPIC converter with CCM I L02 is obtained as e. V D 0 t M = O = 1 (15) V 1-D I 1 DTV 1 s I (cid:1) and i 2 L2e V =V . (16) C1 I I The above results have been obtained even for the L2D f. separate inductor case. So, the magnetically coupling 0 t of inductors do not modifies the dc voltage conversion ratio that only depends on the duty cycle iD i of PWM converter and also the relationship between S the voltages V , V and V . On the other hand, the C1 O I relationship (16) shows that the voltages across the two inductors are equal during each distinct time g. interval that allows to couple the inductors in order 0 t to reduce the input or output current ripple [1], [2]. Using these new results, (9), (10) and (11), (12) Fig.3 The waveforms of currents and voltages in become: PWM SEPIC converter with CCM di V 1 = I (17) dt L 1e Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) di V (cid:6) (cid:3) 2 = I (18) I = D1VI (cid:4) D1 - 1 (cid:1) (29) dt L2e L01 R (cid:4)(cid:5)(1-D )2 K (cid:1)(cid:2) 1 1m and DV (cid:6) 1 1 (cid:3) di1 =-VO (19) IL02 = 1R I (cid:4)(cid:5)1-D - K (cid:1)(cid:2). (30) dt L 1 2m 1e We can now to find the average currents of transistor di V 2 =- O (20) switch and diode as follows: dt L 2e D2V M2V where we denoted two effective inductances: I =D (I +I )= 1 I = I (31) ( ) S 1 L1 L2 R(1-D )2 R 1-k2 L 1 L = c 1 (21) DV MV 1e 1-k / n I =(1-D )(I +I )= 1 I = I . (32) ( c ) D 1 L1 L2 R(1-D ) R 1-k2 L 1 L = c 2 . (22) The results of this simplified analysis completely 2e 1-k n c characterise the steady-state behaviour of the The equations (17) to (20) show that coupled coupled-inductor PWM SEPIC converter in inductors fed by the same voltage waveforms will continuous conduction mode. For the separate exhibit as two equivalent inductors, which only inductor case, it is enough to set k at zero into the c depend on the physical inductor structure. The same above results. As consequence, L fiL , L fiL , 1e 1 2e 2 equations give the theoretical conditions to cancel K fiK and K fiK . the inductor current ripples that is L fi¥ or 1m 1 2m 2 1e L fi¥. So, the analysis results from the coupled 2e inductor SEPIC converter can be extended to non- 3 Steady-state Analysis of SEPIC coupled inductor SEPIC converter and vice versa. Converter with DCM Furthermore, two coupled inductors exhibit as two For SEPIC PWM converter as well as for Cuk PWM equivalent inductors with the effective inductances converter, a discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) given by (21) and (22), and shown in Fig. 2b. means that the third time interval of operation cycle Therefore, Fig. 2b serves exclusively for a clear is nonzero, not that either inductor current is representation of (17) and (20). discontinuous. Coupled inductor techniques can be The average values of the inductor current ripples applied to PWM SEPIC converter with DCM to can be directly found from the waveforms of the achieve low-ripple input current [1]. inductor currents given in the Fig. 3 as: Assume that the output current is now further DT V DV I = 1 s I = 1 I (23) decreased to enable the converter to enter into L1D 2L k R 1e 1m discontinuous conduction mode. The waveforms of DT V DV inductor currents and voltages corresponding to this I = 1 s I = 1 I (24) L2D 2L k R operating mode are shown in Fig. 4. 2e 2m Three distinct time intervals appears there, where we denoted two parameters of conduction namely DT , D T and D T with D +D +D =1 through the inductors as follows: 1 s 2 s 3 s 1 2 3 for a constant switching frequency. For DCM, K =2L f / R (25) 1m 1e s besides of expressions of average inductor currents, K =2L f / R. (26) 2m 2e s average input and output currents, average voltage Next, we determine the components IL01 and across the energy storage capacitor C and average 1 IL02 of inductor currents. For this purpose, we use currents transistor and diode, we have to determine the equations of the dc current through the load and the parameter D that fixes the decay interval of 2 the efficiency as follows: inductor currents and the dc voltage conversion ratio V O =I =(1-D )(I +I +I +I ) (27) implicitly. R D 1 L1D L01 L2D L02 Concerning the waveforms of inductor currents, it V2 can see that the shapes of the currents in Fig. 4 are O =hV (I +I ). (28) similar to those shown in Fig. 3. Only the scales are R I L1D L01 different and the currents I and I are equal Using the assumption of 100% efficiency, the L01 L02 and have an inverse sense: following results are obtained: I =-I =I . (33) L01 L02 L0 The currents through inductors can be expressed as Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) i =i +I (34) For the first two time intervals DT and D T , L1 1 L0 1 s 2 s i =i -I . (35) (9), (10) and (11), (12) keep their validity. For the L2 2 L0 third time interval (D T ), the voltages across 3 s v inductors are zero: v =v =0. Taking into account L1 D T D T D T L1 L2 1 s 2 s 3 s that the average voltages across the inductors over a switching period are zero, the following relationships result: V I D V =V = 2 V . (36) a. C1 I D O 0 Ts t 1 V The above relationships yield the dc voltage O conversion ratio V D iL1 M = O = 1 (37) V D I 2 and IL0 V =V . (38) C1 I b . The remark regarding the relationship (38) that is 0 t the same as (18) for the converter with CCM keeps i DT V its validity for the converter with DCM. The 1 1 s I determination of the conversion ratio M needs the L 1e value of parameter D too. It is obvious that the IL1D 2 conditions of ripple cancellation from the inductor c. current found for CCM remain unchanged for DCM. 0 t Also, the two effective inductances and two parameters of conduction through the inductors hold v L2 their expressions. Using the waveforms of inductor currents, the formula of average value of ripple component of V I inductor currents can be written as: d. D (D +D )V D (D +D )V 0 t I = 1 1 2 I = 1 1 2 I (39) VO L1D 2L1e fs K1mR D (D +D )V D (D +D )V IL2D = 1 21L f 2 I = 1 K1 R2 I . (40) i 2e s 2m L2 The calculation of these components of inductor currents needs to find the parameter D firstly. In 2 e. 0 t order to find the expression of the component IL0, - IL0 we use again the relationship of the converter efficiency, that is DT V V I =hV (I +I ). (41) 1 s I O O I L1D L0 i2 L For assumption of 100% efficiency, the above 2e equation yields I L2D DV (cid:12) D D (cid:9) f. 0 t IL0 = 1R I (cid:10)(cid:10)(cid:11)K21m - K12m (cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:8). (42) As it can be seen from the waveforms of currents iS iD in the transistor and diode, shown as iS and respectively i in Fig. 4g, the total rise of i during D S 0£t£DT should be equal to the total fall in i g. 1 s D 0 t during D1Ts £t£(D1+D2)Ts. This means that we have Fig.4 The waveforms of the currents and voltages in PWM SEPIC converter with DCM Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July 10-12, 2006 (pp217-222) (cid:6)di di (cid:3) steady-state currents such as the average input and DT (cid:4) 1 + 2(cid:1) = output currents, and the average currents of transistor 1 s(cid:5)dt dt (cid:2) 0£t£D1(cid:215)Ts (43) and diode are found. For the dc voltage conversion (cid:6) di di (cid:3) ratio and the average voltage across the energy D T (cid:4)- 1 - 2(cid:1) storage capacitor, we found the same formula as in 2 s(cid:5) dt dt (cid:2) D1(cid:215)Ts£t£(D1+D2)(cid:215)Ts the separate inductor case because we neglected the and after substituting the corresponding slopes of equivalent series resistance of capacitors. The inductor currents and using (38), we find the dc steady-state analysis developed here supplies the voltage conversion ratio in (37) once more. formula of equivalent inductances in the coupled- The average currents of transistor and diode result inductor case that are entailed by a dynamic analysis as follows: based on the small-signal equivalent circuit of D M2V converter. This simplified analysis yields the same IS = D +1D (IL1D +IL2D)= R I (44) results as one based on the large-signal PWM switch 1 2 [6]. D MV I = 2 (I +I )= I . (45) Formally, the dc conversion ratio of PWM SEPIC D D +D L1D L2D R converter with coupled-inductors and operating in 1 2 Now, we proceed to determine the formula for the DCM has the same formula as in the separate- parameter D2. For this purpose, we use the dc load inductor case. But, the parameter D2 takes the current combining (39), (40) with (45). As result, the coupling effect into account, by means of the parameter D is given by the formula parameter of conduction through an equivalent 2 inductor with the inductance L . The average input D = K (46) em 2 em and output currents, and the average currents of where the quantity transistor and diode as well as the boundary equation K =2L f / R (47) em em s include the coupling effect too. So, the steady-state represents the parameter of conduction through an operating point and the parameters of small-signal equivalent inductor with the inductance low-frequency model of converter depend on the L =L // L . coupling parameter. em 1e 2e References: 4 Boundary between the Continuous [1] J. W. Kolar, H. Sree, N. Mohan and F. C. Zach, and Discontinuous Conduction Modes Novel Aspects of an Application of ‘Zero’- For a complete characterization of the PWM SEPIC Ripple Techniques to Basic Converter converter operating, we find now the equation of the Topologies, IEEE PESC’97, Vol. 1, pp. 796-803 boundary between CCM and DCM for the coupled- [2] J. Chen and C. Chang, Analysis and Design of inductor case. It is well known that a converter will SEPIC Converter in Boundary Conduction Mode change the operating mode when the following for Universal-line Power Factor Correction equality is satisfied: Applications, in Proc. IEEE PESC’0, 2001. D2 =1-D1. (48) [ 3 ] S. Ben-Yaakov, D. Adar and G. Rahav, A SPICE This means that the parameter K reached its compatible Behavioral Model of SEPIC em critical value Converters, IEEE PESC’96, Vol. 2, pp. 1668- K =(1-D )2. (49) 1673 emcrt 1 [4] W. M. Moussa, Modeling and performance The same equation can be derived starting from (33). evaluation of a DC/DC SEPIC converter, All these results characterize the PWM SEPIC APEC’95, Vol. 2, pp. 702–706 converter with separate inductors, case in which we [5] D. Adar, G. Rahav and S. Ben-Yaakov, A have to set k at zero. c unified behavioral average model of SEPIC converters with coupled inductors, IEEE PESC’97, Vol. 1, pp. 441- 446 5 Conclusion [6] V. Vorperian, Simplified analysis of PWM A steady-state analysis that completely characterizes converters using model of PWM switch, Parts I the behavior of PWM SEPIC converter with coupled (CCM) and II (DCM), IEEE Trans. on Aerospace or separate inductors and operating in CCM or DCM Electronic Systems, Vol. 26, 1990, pp. 497-505 was made in this paper. Taking the effects of inductor coupling into account, the expressions of all