ebook img

A REVIEW OF THE WOLF SPIDER GENUS HIPPASELLA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE, SOSIPPINAE) PDF

2007·5.9 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview A REVIEW OF THE WOLF SPIDER GENUS HIPPASELLA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE, SOSIPPINAE)

2007. The Journal of Arachnology 35:313-317 A REVIEW OF THE WOLF SPIDER GENUS HIPPASELLA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE, SOSIPPINAE) Eder S. S. Alvares1*2 and Aetoeto D* Brescovlt1: ^aboratorio de Artropodes, Instituto Butantan, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil 2Departamenfo de Zoologia, Institute de Biocieecias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. The monotypic genus Hippasella Mello-Leitao 1944 is revised, and its type-species H. nitida Mello-Leitao 1944 is considered a junior synonym of Tarentula guaquiensis Strand 1908, from Bolivia. Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand) comb. nov. is redescribed and the female genitalia are illustrated for the first time. This species now is recorded from Peru, Bolivia and Argentina. It appears to prefer vegetation near water. RESUMO. O genero monotipico Hippasella Mello-Leitao 1944 e revisado e sua espeeie-tipo H. nitida Mello-Leitao 1944 e considerada um sinonimojunior de Tarentula guaquiensis Strand 1908, da Bolivia. Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand) comb. nov. e redeserita e a genitalia da femea 6 ilustrada pela primeira vez. Esta especie e agora conhecida do Peru, Bolivia e da Argentina, onde parece preferir a vegetagao proxima a agua. Keywords* Neotropical, taxonomy, redescription The genus Hippasella was proposedby Me- turals, Porto Alegre, and in the Museo de llo-Leitao (1944) based on Hippasella nitida Historia Natural San Marcos, Lima, we found Mello-Leitao 1944, a species known only some additional specimens ofthis species, in- from a male specimen collected in La Plata, cluding females. Moreover, after examining Argentina. The type-specimen of H. nitida is the types of Tarentula guaquiensis Strand an adult male, but it is fragmented and in bad 1908, housed in the Museum Wiesbaden, condition. Capocasale (1990) studied the type Wiesbaden, and kindly loaned by Dr. Michael H specimen of H, nitida and syeonymized Hip- Apel, we detected a new synonym for ni- pasella with Sosippus Simon 1888, based on tida. In this paper, we present a more detailed the eye arrangement observed on the carapace redescription of this genus and the first illus- fragments of the type specimen and on the trations of the female genitalia. absence ofapalea and ofaterminal apophysis METHODS in the male pedipalp. However, Sierwald (2000), refering to the figures of Capocasale Descriptions and terminology follow Santos (1990, figs. 12, 13), pointed out that the male & Brescovit (2001). All measurements are in pedipalp of H. nitida does not have a long millimeters. The abbreviations used in the text finger-shaped apophysis (apophysis a in Sier- are the following: ALE, anterior lateral eyes; wald 2000: 136, fig. 7) shared by all Sosippus AME, anterior mediae eyes; PLE, posterior species. Moreover, the original size ratio of lateral eyes; PME, posterior median eyes. the eyes described by Mello-Leitao (1944: The material examined are deposited in the 343) for H. nitida does not match the ratio following collections: IBSP, Instituto Butae- observed in the remaining Sosippus species. tan, Sao Paulo, Brazil; MHNSM, Museo de Based on these observations, Sierwald (2000) Historia Natural San Marcos, Lima, Peru; revalidated the genus Hippasella. MCN, Museu de Ciencias Naturais, Fundagao For a long time the only known specimen Zoobotanicado Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Ale- of H. nitida was the fragmented type speci- gre, Brazil; MWNH, Museum Wiesbaden, men. Recently, afterexaminingLycosidae ma- Wiesbaden, Germany; SMF, Naturmuseum terial housed in the Museu de Cieecias Na- Senckeeberg, Frankfurt, Germany. 313 314 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY ezoidal (Figs. 2, 3). Chelicerae strong; promargin with three teeth, the median bigger than lateral ones; retromargin with three big, equal and equidistant teeth. Sternum longer than wide, brownish, covered with grayish se- tae. Spinnerets: anterior lateral spinnerets con- ical, posterior median small, posterior lateral with distal segment not elongated. Male ped- ipalp: tibia cylindrical, 1.67 times longer than wide; cymbium piriform, without distal spines and with basal retrolateral edge dilated; te- gulum large, with spermatic ducts visible ven- trally, sigmoid; in ventral view (Fig. 4), the apical borderbearing a small andtransversally elongated projection at median region; retro- lateral margin of tegulum with a developed and ventrally pointed tegular lobe (Fig. 5). Median apophysis small, membranous and elongated, with distal end curved ventrally. Embolus with broad base, and distal area fi- — liform and located below the base of median Figures 1-2. Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand apophysis (Fig. 6). Terminal apophysis absent. 1908), female from Huatajata, Bolivia: 1. Carapace, Epigynum: median septum wider than long, f=ron2t.a0l0vmimew.; 2. Carapace, lateral view. Scale bars flattened, with copulatory openings located anteriorly at its lateral borders (Fig. 7); epigy- nal plate and posterior half of median septum TAXONOMY covered with small setae; atrium reduced, forming a narrow depression at lateral side of Family Lycosidae Sundevall 1833 median septum. Internally (Fig. 8, 9) sper- Subfamily Sosippinae Dondale 1986 mathecae hardly sclerotized, with small and Hippasella Mello-Leitao 1944 not bilobate base, located dorsally at the stalk Hippasella Mello-Leitao 1944:342; Roewer 1955: (Fig. 8); stalk elongated, curved in an “S” 313; Roewer 1960:1002. like shape. Head small, globular. Copulatory Sosippus Simon: Capocasale 1990:140 (synonymy ducts large, flattened, and located medially to rejected by Sierwald 2000:138). — the base. Fertilization ducts small, membra- Type species. Hippasella nitida Mello- nous, located at posterior margin and curved Leitao 1944, by original designation and mo- dorsally (Fig. 9). notypy. — Remarks.-—The placement of Hippasella Diagnosis. Males of Hippasella can be in Sosippinae is based on the absence of a distinguished from males of other genera of terminal apophysis and of a developed palea Sosippinae by the tegular lobe in the pedipalp in the male pedipalp. Moreover, retrolaterally with a small and pointed lateral apophysis the base of the male pedipalpal cymbium of (Figs. 4, 5); a small and membranous median Hippasella is enlarged, as seen in species of apophysis (Figs. 4, 5); and by a small lobe on Sosippus,Aglaoctenus Tullgren 1905 andDia- the apical edge ofthe tegulum seen in the ven- pontia Keyserling 1876, and this charactercan tral view (Fig. 4). Females can be distin- be added to the diagnosis of Sosippinae. guished by the large and flattened median sep- tum, and by spermathecae with a long and Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand 1908) sigmoid curved stalk and with a small and not comb. nov. bilobate base (F—ig. 8). Figs. 1-10 Description. Small lycosids (length 5.81- Tarentula guaquiensis Strand 1908:252. 8.40 mm). Carapace piriform, flattened dor- Lycosa guaquiensis (Strand): Petmnkevitch 1911: sally (Fig. 1). Eyes: anterior ocularrow slight- 559. ly procurve (Fig. 2); ocular quadrangle trap- Hippasella nitida Mello-Leitao 1944:343, fig. 32; — ALVARES & BRESCOVIT—REVIEW OF HIPPASELLA 315 Figures 3-9. Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand 1908), from Huatajata, Bolivia: 3. Female body, dorsal view; 4. Male pedipalp, ventral view; 5. Male pedipalp, retrolateral view; 6. Malepedipalp, antero-ventral view; 7. Female epigynum, ventral view; 8. Cleared female epigynum, ventral view; 9. Female epigynum, dorsal view. Abbreviations: BS = base of spermatheca, E = embolus, EP = epigynal plate, FD = fertil- ization duct, HS = head of spermatheca, MA — median apophysis, MS - median septum, S = stalk of spermatheca, TL = tegular lobe. Scale bar's: Figure 3 = 2.00 mm; Figures 4-9 = 0.25 mm. Roewer 1955:313; Sierwald 2000:138. New syn- lotype. La Plata, Buenos Aires (34.9°S, onymy. 57.9°W), M. Biraben (MLP #16035). Trochosa guaquiensis (Strand): Roewer 1955:301. Other material examined.—PERU: De Sosippus nitidus (Mello-Leitao): Capocasale 1990: partamento de Pasco: 2 $ Pucayacu 139, figs. 12, 13; Platnick 1993:508. (10°39.2'S, 76°14.0'W), 8 May 2,005, W. Pa- Type specimens.—Tarentula guaquiensis redes, D. Causso (MHNSM); Departamento : BOLIVIA: 1 male (without pedipalps), 1 fe- de Cusco: 1 9, Cusco (13°30.4'S, 71°59.0'W), male syntype, Guaqui (not Peru) (16.5°S, June-July 1983, M. del Castillo (MHNSM); 2 68.8°W), 1907, K. Seyd (MWNH #448); 1 9, Quebrada Jaluemoco Huayco (13°35.7' S, pedipalp of the male syntype mounted on a 71°58.5'W), 23 March 2005, W. Paredes microscope slide (SMF #13521-138). (MHNSM); Departamento de Puno: 1 9, Hippasella nitida: ARGENTINA: male ho- Arapa, border of Lake Titicaca (15°07.4'S, — 316 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Total length: 5.81; carapace length: 2.98; car- AME apace width: 2.13. Eye diameters: 0.14; ALE 0.12; PME 0.22; PLE 0.17. Eye inter- AME-AME AME-ALE distances: 0.08; 0.04; PME-PME 0.14; PME-PLE 0.16; PLE-PLE 0.59. Clypeus: 0.07 height. Leg I: femur 1.80/ patella 1.05/tibia 1.48/metatarsus 1.48/tarsus 00.-92/total 6.73; leg II: 1.79/0.99/1.30/1.39/ 0.92/6.39; leg III: 1.76/0.82/1.22/1.61/0.89/ 6.30; leg IV: 2.13/1.07/1.74/2.40/1.17/8.51. L1e-gs, spination: femur I: p0-0-2, dl-1-0, rO, II: p0-l-l, dl-1-0, rO; III: p0-l-l, dl-1-1, iO- 0-1; IV: pO (or pl-0-0, or pO-0-1), dl-1-1, rl- 0; patellae I II: pO, rO; III: pi, rl; IV: pi, rl; tibia I: pl-1, dO, rO I v2-0-2; II: pl-1, do- 0, r0-l v2-2-2 or vlr-2-2; III-IV: pl-1, d0-l, rl-1, v2-2-2; metatarsus I: p0-l-l, rO, v2-2-3; II: p0-l-l, r0-l-l, v2-2-3; III-IV: pl-1-1, rl- 1, v2-2-3 (v3-2-3 in metatarsus IV). Tarsus and distal end of metatarsus of legs I and II Figure 10.—Hippasella guaquiensis (Strand weakly scopulate. Pedipalp (Figs. 4-6): see 1908), known records. Peru: 1. Pucayacu; 2. Cusco; description in the genus. 3. QuebradaJalunmoco Huayco; 4. Arapa; 5. Puno. Female (Huatajata Bolivia MCN#23788): Bolivia: 6. Huatajata; 7. Guaqui. Argentina: 8. La Coloration as in male,s except carapace with Plata. lateral pale bands almost marginal (Fig. 3), dorsum of abdomen with lateral pale bands darker, and venter of abdomen with a median N7(0oM°vH0eN6m.Sb3M'e)rW;),11948N8,oPvuF.enmoBbl(ae1nr5c°a4s91.9(64'8MS,H,N7FS0.°M0B)1l;.a3n'BcWOa)-s, plaaoplnaegciebtauldneidnngaotlhn:dea3a.rc9kh6;bsiacdnae.draTpboaotcraeldelwreienddgtthhb::y38..a1138l.;atEcearyrae-l LIVIA: Departamento de La Paz: 1 8, 1 $, AME ALE PME diameters: 0.20; 0.16; 0.29; Huatajata, border ofLake Titicaca (16°06.0'S&, PLE 0.25. Eye interdistances: AME-AME 68°42.0'W), 8 August 1993, A.D. Brescovit AME-ALE PME-PME H(.IBSHPof#e6r69(77M)C.N #23788); 1 9, same data P0.M1E0;-PLE 0.26; PLE0-.0P8L;E 0.89. Leg I: f0e.m2u1;r — Diagnosis. The same for the genus. 2.55/patella 1.48/tibia 1.79/metatarsus 1.84/ Description. Male (Huatajata, Bolivia tarsus 1.17/total 8.83; leg II: 2.37/1.45/1.66/ MCN #23788): Carapace brownish with gray 1.79/1.12/8.39; leg III: 2.24/1.33/1.48/1.96/ setae and with 1 dorsal and 1 submarginal I.10/8.11; leg IV: 2.98/1.52/2.22/2.93/1.38/ pale band, with dark radial bands; eyes sur- II.03. Leg spination as male, except: femur I: rounded by black areas. Chelicerae, sternum p0-0-l; IV: pO, rO; tibia I: pO, dO, rO, vO-lp-2; and labium brown; coxae and endites yellow- II: p0-0-l, dO, rO, v O-lr-2; III-IV: dO; ish. Legs: dorsum offemora, patellae, and tib- metatarsus I: pO; II: pO-l-O or pO, vO. Epigy- iae yellowish with dark spots; metatarsi and num (Figs. 7-—9): see generic description. tarsi light brown; venter of femora and tibiae Variation. Nine females. Total length: yellowish with brown spots; patellae, metatar- 6.96-8.92; carapace length: 3.67-4.07; length si, and tarsi brown. Abdomen: dorsum with a of femur I: 2.16-2.55. Three males. Total dorsal longitudinal brown band delineated by length: 5.29-7.60; carapace length: 2.98-3.85; black lines and bordered by a pale longitudi- length of fem—ur I: 1.80-2.55. nal band on each side; sides brown with 4-6 Remarks. The type locality of Tarentula yellowish parallel longitudinal lines; venter guaquiensis was previously considered to be yellowish with two median parallel black located in Peru. However, there is no locality lines, extending from the epigastric furrow to called Guaqui in Peru, but there is a locality the middle of abdomen. Spinnerets yellowish. of the same name in Bolivia, near the edge of . ALVARES & BRESCOVIT—REVIEW OF HIPPASELLA 317 Lake Titicaca, situated close to the border of Mello-Leitao, C.E 1944. Aranas de la provincia de Peru and Bolivia* Buenos Aires. Revistadel MuseoLaPlata(Nova aboNuattutrhaelhabhiitsstoofryt.h—isVesrpyecielsit*tlAesIstheknspoewcn- PetSreannek,eviZtocohl,ogAi.a)139:1311.1-A393s.ynonymic index-cata- logue of spiders of North, Central and South imens from Huatajata, Bolivia, and Arapa, America with all adjacent islands, Greenland, Peru, were collected near the border of Lake Bermuda, West Indies, Terra del Fuego, Gala- Titicaca, we believe that this species lives in pagos, etc. Bulletin ofthe American Museum of vegetation near water as some other South Natural History 29:1-791. American Sosippinae. Platnick, NX 1993. Advances in Spider Taxonomy Distribution.—The only knownrecords are 1988-1991, with Synonymies and Transfer from Peru, Bolivia and Argentina (Fig. 10). 1940-1988. NewYorkEntomological Society,in ACKNOWLEDGMENTS association with the American Museum of Nat- ural History, New York. 846 pp. We would like to thank Adriana Davanzzo Roewer, C.E 1955. Katalog der Araneae von 1758 for revising the English version of the manu- bis 1940, bzw. 1954. Bruxelles, 2:1-1751. script, Volker Frameeau, Petra Sierwald, Roewer, C.E 1960. Araneae Lycosaeformia II Mark Harvey, and the editors of the Journal (Lycosidae) (Fortsetzung and Schluss). Explora- of Arachnology for comments and sugges- tion du Parc National de l’Upemba Mission G.E tions. We are grateful to thefollowing curators SanDtoes,WiAt.tJe. 5&5:A5.19D-1B0re4s0c.ovit. 2001. A revision of supplying material for study, D. Silva the South American spider genus Aglaoctenus (MHNSM), E.H. Buckup (MCN), M. Apel Tullgren, 1905 (Araneae,Lycosidae,Sosippinae). (MWNH), and P. Jager (SMF); we are partic- Andrias 15:75-90. ularly grateful to M. Apel who kindly located Sierwald, P. 2000. Description of the male of So- and sent us the Strand types. Financial support sippusplacidus with notes on the subfamily So- was provided by FAPESP (n. 99/05446-8 and sippinae (Aranea,e, Lycosidae). Journal ofArach- 02/11275-6). This study is part ofthe BIOTA/ nology 28:133-140. — FAPESP die Virtual Institute Program (www. Strand, E. 1908. Exotisch araneologiscfaes.- I. biotasp.org.br) and of the Doctoral thesis in Amerikanische hauptsachlich in Peru, Bolivian Zoology by the first author, developed in the und l—osemitetal in Californien ge—sammelte Spin- Departamento de Zoologia, Institute de Bio- nen. II. Spinnenaus Kamerun. III.—Ubersicht der bekanten Hysterocrates-Arten. IV. Zur ciencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Pau- Kenntnis der Araneae rufipalpis (Luc). Jahrbii- lo, Brazil. cher des Nassauischen Verreins fur Naturkunde LITERATURE CITED 61:223-295. Capocasale, R.M. 1990. Las especies de la subfa- rmHa Hippasinae de America del Sur (Araneae, Manuscriptreceived2 October2006, revised2May Lycosidae). Journal ofArachnology 18:131-141. 2007

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.