INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Mi 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI’ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE UNIVERSITY- OF OKLAHOMA. GRADUATE COLLEGE A PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF JUNIOR COLLEGES FOR OKLAHOMA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION BY BRUCE G. CARTER Norman, Oklahoma 1950 - UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA l i b r a r y Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: DP10162 __ ® UMI UMI Microform DP10162 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF JUNIOR COLLEGES FOR OKLAHOMA APPROVED BT THESIS CO] 329680 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To my -wife, Mary Nola Carter, who has been a constant inspiration and guide to me, this thesis is respectfully dedicated. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sincere thanks are due Dr. John F. Bender for his timely assistance, for his counsel and guidance, and for his infinite patience in directing the work of this thesis. Grateful appreciation is expressed to Mrs. Lula K. Pratt and Mrs. Etta R. Bruton, faculty members of Northeastern Oklahoma A. & M. College, for their assistance in helping with this report. A debt of gratitude is expressed to the University of Oklahoma and to the citizens of the State who support it. Personal acknowledgement is also due the members of the Board of Regents for Oklahoma A. St M. Colleges for their kind coopera tion in making it possible for the writer to arrange his time in such a . way as to permit this thesis to be written. BRUCE G. CARTER i iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTESTS Page LIST OF TABLES.............................................. ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................................ xii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION.......................................... 1 II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TEE JUNIOR COLLEGE.......... 4 Early Permanent Public Junior Colleges ............ 8 President Harper’s Prophecy........................ 10 Purpose of the Founders............................ 14 Currently Accepted Definitions of Purpose .......... 18 Objectives of the California Junior Colleges . . . . 20 Purposes of a Junior College......... 21 Cost of Junior Colleges in Relation to Attendance . • 25 III. THE JUNIOR COLLEGE IN OKLAHOMA .............. 29 State Junior Colleges . . . . . . . .............. 30 Municipal Junior Colleges .......................... 35 Independent Junior Colleges ........................ 40 Discontinued Junior Colleges...................... 42 The Future of the Institution in Oklahoma.......... 47 Need in Oklahoma for Vocational Courses ............ 52 General Education. Guidance ...................... 52 Adult Education......... 53 Civic Leadership. 54 IV. THE JUNIOR COLLEGE MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES . . . . 55 Organizational Structure and Finance . . . . . . . . 55 Financial Control....................... 71 Junior College Costs . . . . . .............. .. . 73 Curriculum Patterns and Course Offerings . . . . . . 76 Terminal Education ................................ 77 The Trend and Predicted Future ............... 78 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.