A PHYLOGENY OF ARCTOSTAPHYLOS INFERRED (ERICACEAE) FROM NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL SEQUENCES ITS Thomas Gregory Wahlert Parker A. V. Ohio San University Francisco State University Ohio 4570 San USA. Athens, U.S.A. Francisco, California 94132, 1, [email protected] [email protected] CVasey Michael Department of Environmental Studies of Santa Cruz University California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, U.S.A. INTRODUCTION Arctostaphylos Adans. (Ericaceae) composed of 108 taxa and the most species-rich genus of subfamily is ca. is Arbutoideae Nied. (Wells 2000). Except Spreng.—which has circumboreal for Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) a — distribution the remaining species are confined to western North America and Mexico. In California, occur communities, montane species of Arctostaphylos in a variety of plant including chaparral, scrub, mixed- coniferous serpentine barrens, and oak savannas. At low forests, latitudes, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi montane occurs in regions Rockies, Appalachians, Alps, Himalayas) and in coastal pine barrens and (e.g., of Texas Journal of the Botanical Research Institute 3(2) 674 New (Donn.Sm.) represents P.V.Wells dunes and Michigan, USA). A. uva-ursi subsp. cratericola Jersey (e.g., highlands Guatemala. population in the volcanic of disjunct a Arbutus Arbutoideae with other genera: Arctous Nied., L., placed subfamily five in Arctostaphylos is & Breckon Molecular Zucc, Small, and Xylococcus Nutt. (Diggs 1981). Ornithostaphylos Comarostaphylis between basalmost Arbutoideae the and morphological phylogenetic studies in the Ericaceae place the Markos presented phylogenetic (Kron (1998) Monotropoideae and the rest of the family et 2002). et al. al. spacer (nrlTS) from nuclear ribosomal internally transcribed inferred 16 species of Arctostaphylos trees for was congruent not The two-clade topology recovered in their trees and 28S ribosomal sequences. nuclear G.Don monophyly species with two subgenera of Wells (2000) nor did support the of the A. hooheri the it Boykin presented nrlTS phylogeny of 38 taxa (Markos (2005) a complex Pungens 1998). in section et et al. al. congruent (with respect two-clade phylogenies are recovered a two-clade topology. Further, these that also 20 with phenogram constructed from flavonoid data for species of Arctostaphylos composition) species a to (Denford 1981). CA The centered about San Francisco, in the California Floris- center of diversity tor Arctostaphylos is from Mendocino County Santa Barbara The and Coast Ranges of California, to Province. coastal areas tic endemic has high percentage of (Markos al Arctostaphylos a County, particularly rich in taxa et 1998). are considered many of which are edaphic specialists (Wells 2000). Nearly half of all California taxa are taxa, may modern (CNPS The taxa be the result of a radiation endangered 2009). diversity of threatened, or rare, end Miocene Ma) (Edwards 2004). Factors contributing to the diversi- since the of the (5.3 of Arctostaphylos an frequency increase in genus include adaptation to California's diverse substrates, fire of the local fication and contemporaneous expansion of Mediterranean the the end of the Pliocene, the onset of a climate, at & Edwards Axelrod Axelrod 1989; 2004). (Raven 1978; chaparral into forested areas The base and two processes driving speciation in Arctostaphylos. Hybridization polyploidization are = chromosome number x = with most species being either diploid (In 26) or tetraploid in Arctostaphylos 13, is and evidence the allopolyploid = provide morphological cytological for Schierenbeck (1992) (2n et 52). al. homoploid hybrid mewukha Merriam. Many other taxa have been proposed as arising via specia- origin of A. & Knight Keeley Dobzhansky Schmid 1968; Kruckeberg 1977; 1985; 1968; 1953; Gottlieb et tion al. (e.g., & Massihi 1994; Parker Vasey 2004). For a group of 46 edaphic specialists or endemic taxa, Wells (2000) subsp. ploidy observed in Arctostaphylos uva-ursi coactilis proposed hybrid origin for 37. Differing levels a & which and = 52 and suggests recent recurring polyploidization, is (2n 78) Fernald J.F.Macbr. 26, 39, common Brochmann 2004). plants (Rosatti 1981; et in arctic al. 1995)— hybrid Rieseberg par- Morphological intermediacy not always a reliable indicator of origin (e.g., is and polyploidization in Arctostaphylos has lead to introgression that in Arctostaphylos. likely ticularly It is based on morphological characters. and taxonomic that are misleading phylogenetic inferences classifications been nrlTS region has and A.Gray, the bi-parentally inherited, In perennial species of Paeonia L. Sidalcea In taxa (Sang 1995; Whittall et 2000). used corroborate parentage of allopolyploid et al. al. successfully to may evidence provide additional sequencing maternally inherited chloroplast angiosperms, of the direct Wahlert (2005) by maternal parent (Koontz 2004). In Arctostaphylos, hybrid origin identifying the et al. of trnS-trnG and spacers atpB-rbcL, trnL-trnF, intron the intergenic sequenced chloroplast regions (trnL five The combined and resulting geographically distant species. and 12 morphologically divergent trnH-psbA) for Thus, and had parsimony informative positions. direct alignment was 1,836 base pairs (bp) long just three confirm maternal could not be used to infer relationships or to sequencing of the chloroplast in Arctostaphylos parentage in hybrids species. appear influence the rate of speciation. In California's Different history strategies in Arctostaphylos to life and Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) are the only genera of chaparral communities, Arctostaphylos L. fire-prone mode reproduction (Wells have evolved an obligate seeding of shrubs containing species that sclerophyllous and populations response In these genera, in about two thirds of the species, adults are killed in to fire 1969). but by from seed banks. Most chaparral shrubs re-sprout after a stand-replacing fire, recruitment recover Wahlert phylogeny and et ITS Arctostaphylos 675 al., in species of Arctostaphylos and Ceanothus, seeds are stored in a persistent seed bank from which they soil germinate only after fire (Parker and Kelly 1990). Therefore, each post-fire generation of obligate seeders a is product of sexual reproduction, whereas facultative sprouters regenerate primarily from vegetative re-sprouts & A from (but also to a lesser degree seed) (Keeley Keeley 1981). higher rate of morphological diversifica- and endemism 70% supported by tion local for seeders is the fact that ca. of Arctostaphylos taxa are obligate seeders (Wells 1969). Generation-time theory predicts that taxa with shorter generation times have will DNA higher molecular compared rates of evolution in neutral regions taxa with longer generation times to & Andreasen (e.g., Baldwin 2001). For that reason, it is hypothesized that in Arctostaphylos, there will be a among higher ITS sequence compared rate of interspecific variability obligate seeders to facultative sprouters. The primary was goal of this study to estimate the phylogeny of Arctostaphylos with extensive taxon sampling using nrlTS sequences. Increased taxon sampling could refine species composition of each clade, might reveal additional subclades, and could allow for more rigorous testing of the monophyly of certain we infrageneric taxa. In addition, sought to corroborate hybrid origin in putative hybrid species and to a test hypothesis higher compared of rates of nucleotide substitution in obligate seeders to facultative sprouters. AND METHODS MATERIALS Taxon Sampling The ingroup included a total of 98 accessions representing 83 unique taxa. The remaining 15 accessions were multiple samples of morphologically diverse and/or widely distributed species: Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, HBK, A. patula Greene, A. pungens A. manzanita Parry, A. glandulosa Eastw., and A. tomentosa (Pursh) Lindl. The outgroup contained six species representing the other five genera in the Arbutoideae. All sequences generated for this study were new, except for two accessions of Arctostaphylos and outgroup which five taxa, were downloaded from GenBank (Appendix Taxonomy Wells with names, follows (2000) geographic 1). GenBank voucher specimen and numbers Appendix origin, data, accession given in All accessions se- 1. quenced by for this study are represented voucher specimens deposited at the Harry D. Thiers Herbarium San MO. Francisco which at State University (SFSU), except for Arctous erythrocarpa, deposited at is DNA PCR and Extraction, Amplification, Sequencing DNA Genomic was from herbarium DNeasy™ (QIAGEN extracted material using Plant Mini Kits Corp., Alameda, CA, The was USA). nrlTS region amplified using Arctostaphylos-speciRc primers designed for this GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG CTGGGGTCGCAATCAAGG. study ITS 4-M = and ITS 5-M = (5' to 3'): PCR amplifications for the ITS region were carried out under the following conditions: an denatur- initial ation step (92°C, 2 min) followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (92°C, 30 annealing (58°C, 30 and sec), sec), PCR elongation (72°C, 2 min), with a final extension step (72°C, 5 min). amplifications were performed in DNA PCR 25 pi reactions containing 10-100 ng genomic and 0.25 Expand Taq High System™ pi Fidelity Mg PCR 2+ with buffer and (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). products were visualized on an MO PCR (MO agarose gel and purified using BIO UltraClean™ Clean-up Kits BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cycle-sequencing reactions used the same primers, annealing temperature, and additive as for PCR and employed BigDye® fluorescent dye-labeled chemistry (BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycle-sequenced products were separated and visualized on an DNA When ABI 377 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster CA, USA). polymorphic City, a nucleotide posi- DNA was was tion detected, the taxon sequenced a second time to confirm the polymorphism. sequencing was performed San the Francisco State University Conservation Genetics Laboratory. at Phylogenetic Analyses Due low and to rates of nucleotide substitution few insertions/deletions, ITS sequences were aligned easily Ann Maximum automatically using Sequencher version (Gene Codes, Arbor, MI, USA). parsimony 4.1 (MP) was conducted on two 98 and analysis data sets: the total data set for Arctostaphylos sequences, 1) all reduced with removed had polymorphic 2) a data set 17 taxa that nucleotide positions. Forty-four ingroup Texas Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of 3(2) 76 6 "Gray Leaf" haplotype), which shared ITS sequences, were treated as a single "taxon" (the identical taxa, MP MP used was and analyses number both analyses 55 38, respectively. taxa in therefore the actual of space multiple islands of Olmstead and Palmer (1994) search the tree for search strategy of to the heuristic was PAUP* carried out implemented 4.0bl0 (Swofford 2002), in shortest This search strategy, as ver. trees. used in subsequent searches: 1,000 from each starting trees with saved step as 1) in four steps, the trees MulTrees tree-bisection neighbor interchange (NNI), Off, random sequence nearest 2) addition replicates, A On. consensus On, and TBR, MulTrees tree MulTrees NNI, MulTrees strict reconnection (TBR), Off, 4) 3) branch support phylogenetic trees from each Internal of from saved search. was calculated the shortest trees TBR with search using heuristic 1985) a was estimated with 100 bootstrap (BS) replicates (Felsenstein full from BS random Results the analysis MulTrees and 10 stepwise addition replicates. branch swapping, on, were weighted and unordered, equally summarized consensus Nucleotide characters were in tree. a strict and were missing indels treated as data. 98 and 6 outgroup taxa was 600 bp in length (0% The sequence matrix the ingroup accessions aligned for A bp one deletion and 62 parsimony informative characters. at missing with 127 variable positions data), & Merriam, (W.Knight Gankin) A. nissenana P.V.Wells, 403 was malloryi detected Arctostaphylos position for sequence— "Gray an nrlTS the Forty-four taxa shared identical and three subspecies of A. viscida Parry. used throughout Appendix phrase "Gray Leaf haplotype" this Leaf" haplotype— and are listed in 2 (the is among morphology sharing uniform taxa this shared sequence and does not imply a study to refer to this from ranged ingroup nrlTS sequences to The uncorrected pairwise distances for the sequence). identical maximum parsimoni- 100,000 equally reached of Parsimony complete ITS data a 2.4%. analysis of the set with consistency index (CI) of 0.837 (0.753 ending generation, a ous of length 178 before initial tree trees A shown) consensus (not uninformative and retention index (RI) of 0.881. strict tree excluding characters) American North A. uva- accessions of polytomy and small clade of six three clades: a all revealed a large 1) and containing and (59% clade (58% clade containing A. pumila Nutt. A. tomentosa BS), 3) a ursi BS), 2) a (1) & (90% mewukka and M.C.Vasey V.T.Parker BS). ohloneana A. A. from superimposed sequence electropherograms Polymorphic nucleotide positions were detected in the A. (SNAPs) and were confirmed in 17 taxa (18% of ingroup): A. otayensis, patterns of nucleotide additivity & A. mewukka, Wiesl.), A. viscida ssp. viscida, drupacea Parry (P.VWells), A. A. pilosula (Jeps. pringlei ssp. manzanita (Gankin) P.VWells, A. Humboldt CA, from A. manzanita ssp. manzanita manzanita Co., roofii ssp. CA, x from San Diego A. Munz, manzanita bowermanii, A. pungens Co., pacifica (Eastw.) A. ssp. laevigata ssp. CA, from San Diego A. myrti- Co., glandulosa A. glandulosa edmundsii J.T.Howell, ssp. Roof, A. nissenana, A. within The number polymorphic nucleotide positions and Howell. of nummularia A. hispidula A. (1) folia, Of 4.3% these 17 taxa, 12 are tetraploids an ranged from 6 (0.7% of variable positions). individual to 1 to A. manzanita drupacea, hybrid-derived or introgressed taxa (A. pringlei ssp. and/or hybrids. In four putative showed and sequence electropherograms near-perfect manzanita A. hispidula) A. ssp. laevigata, ssp. roofii, and hybrids (Table between synapomorphic nucleotides of suspected parents 1). patterns of additivity rem MP A with polymorphic nucleotide positions second was conducted with the 17 taxa analysis with 56 parsimony informative chara The sequence matrix had 126 variable positions aligned resulting consensus 350 equally MP of two-clade topology in the reduced ITS data recovered a strict analysis of the set = CI = CI excluding uninformative characters = 0.677, parsimonious length 169, 0.817, trees (Fig. (tree 1) (77% and Clade was moderately well supported = was weakly supported (55% BS) 2 Clade RI 0.858). 1 uva-u containing the six accessions of A. Within Clade two subclades were recovered: a clade 1) BS). 1, and nummularia A.Gray, (59% and containing three subspecies of A. stanfordiana Parry, A. BS) a clade 2) 44 with P.VWells (76% In Clade the Gray Leaf "taxon" representing the taxa identic mendocinoensis BS). 2, were pungens from Arizona, A. austral sequences out in a polytomy while three clades resolved: 1) A. fell Wahlert et ITS phylogeny and Arctostaphylos al., G A G G/A A/G G/T G T 154 and A. pringlei subsp. pringlei (71% BS), A. pumila and A. tomentosa subsp. tomentosa (65% and A. 2) BS), 3) and (59% malloryi A. subsp. mariposa visrida BS). Of 44 an Gray the species sharing identical Leaf haplotype, five are facultative sprouters (A. glandulosa and ssp. cushingiana, A. glandulosa ssp. glaucomollis, A. tomentosa ssp. daciticola, A. tomentosa ssp. insulicola, — A. tomentosa ssp. rosea) and the rest are obligate seeders. The low variability of the nrlTS region and the both and an sequence— fact that obligate seeders several sprouters shared identical precluded a of higher test compared nucleotide substitution rates in seeders sprouters. to The phylogeny inferred from the nrlTS data reveals resolution than had been expected mor- sets less for this and The phologically diverse widely distributed genus. species composition of Clades and 2 recovered in 1 MP the analysis of the reduced nrlTS data set largely congruent with the two-clade molecular phylogenies is Markos and Boykin and phenogram Denford of et al. (1998) et al. (2005), the flavonoid of (1981). MP None of the subclades recovered in analyses have a discrete pattern of geographical distribution mapped that can be onto the phylogeny. Although the circumarctic distribution of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi is unique in the genus, this species also distributed along the coastal areas and mountains of western North is America where co-occurs with other taxa A. columbiana Piper, A. imbricata Eastw., A. Neither patula). it (e.g., and mapped are there discrete readily interpretable morphological or cy tological synapomorphies that can be onto this phylogeny to support the present taxonomic groupings of Wells (2000) or the subclades that were Boykin recovered in the phylogenetic trees. et (2005) found that the character states of inflorescence bracts, al. and monophyly bark, distribution of stomata, ploidy level were not consistent with of certain infrageneric and some more groups that states have arisen than once in the genus. Because Wells' (2000) classification on of Arctostaphylos based potentially homoplasious morphological characters, discordance between his is and the nrlTS phylogeny not unexpected. classification is The occurrence polymorphic showing between of nucleotide positions patterns of additivity synapo- morphic and nucleotides of putative hybrids suspected parents suggestive of hybrid origin in four taxa is many more However, polymorphic showing between and (Table patterns of additivity parents hybrid sites 1). would needed offspring to confirm hybrid origin for the taxa in Table Sang 1995). Such i 1 et (e.g., al. of Texas Journal of the Botanical Research Institute 3(2) Michigan uva-ursi New Jersey uva-ursi Washington uva-ursi Colorado uva-ursi Wyoming uva-ursi mendocinoensis nummularia decumbens subsp. stanfordiana stanfordiana subsp. raichei stanfordiana subsp. stanfordiana ohioneana Nevada patula hookeri hookeri subsp. CA Calaveras patula Co., pungens California hearstiorum hookeri subsp. sensitiva densiflora CA Plumas patuia Co., Guatemala uva-ursi pungens Arizona n-|=:: australis A subsp. pringlei pringlei I tomentosa tomentosa subsp. mailoryi mariposa subsp. viscida Gray Leaf haplotype rainbowensis glandulosa nevadensis tomentosa subsp. Crustacea (1) tomentosa subsp. Crustacea (2) manzanitaXA. stanfordiana tomentosa subsp. subcordata klamathensis subsp. pulchella A. viscida - Alaska Arctous rubra - Arctous erythrocarpa Siberia - Comarostaphyiis diversifolia - Ornithostaphylos oppositifoiia - Arbutus menziesii - Xylococcus bicolor - 3 Wahlert phylogeny and et ITS Arctostaphylos 679 al., polymorphisms hybrid where both suggest: 1) recent origin parental alleles are maintained in the hybrid progeny, between genomes different existing parental 2) alleles in tetraploids, recently substituted nucle- 3) have been homogenized otides that not fully via concerted evolution, or intra-individual nrlTS paralogs 4) (Wendel Koontz et 1995; 2004; Bailey 2003). et et al. al. al. The 44 taxa sharing the Gray Leaf haplotype morphologically and composed both are diverse are of and obligate seeders facultative sprouters (Appendix Sprouting species sharing the Gray Leaf haplotype 2). by represented are five tetraploid taxa of the Arctostaphylos glandulosa-tomentosa complex, whereas most of As the other taxa are diploid obligate seeders. a result, a hypothesis of greater nrlTS nucleotide substitu- tion rates in short generation-time seeders long generation-time sprouters could not be These vs. tested. common results suggest ancestry of "Gray Leaf" taxa, and by extension, the remaining taxa in Clade all 2. common phylogenetic reconstruction based on nrlTS an If of Arctostaphylos is accurate inference of ancestry, much then there has been morphology, and diversification in the cytology, ecological life-histories of taxa in Clade 2 without corresponding nrlTS sequence divergence. Resolving phylogenies and species-level difficult in perennial, reticulating, putatively recently is di- genera such and versified as Arctostaphylos other genera containing species that are widely distributed and morphologically diverse Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae), Hardig 2000, Leucaena (Fabaceae), Bailey (e.g., et al. et al. Low 2004, Inga (Fabaceae), Richardson et 2001). interspecific sequence variability in the nrlTS region in al. may Arctostaphylos be due several factors, including recent diversification in California since the end of the Miocene, long generation time between sexual reproduction genome homogenization events, via introgres- and sion, rapid concerted evolution of nuclear ribosomal ITS arrays in both diploids and tetraploids. The show from and results this study others that direct sequencing of the nrlTS region and the chloroplast DNA provide insufficiently variable sequences needed to resolve phylogenetic relationships in Arctostaphylos. Other PCR-based techniques have been used in Arctostaphylos without success. For example, the presence RAPDs endophytic of fungi in the sclerophyllous leaves of Arctostaphylos prevented the use of (randomly DNAs) comm, amplified polymorphic and sequence inter-simple repeats (ISSRs) Reading, Wahlert (C. pers. unpubl. Another approach RFLPs using fragment polymorphisms) data). (restriction length of the chloroplast may genome prove mewukka useful in corroborating the hybrid origin of A. Schierenbeck, comm.). (K. pers. Bi-parentally inherited nuclear genes with adequate sequence needed phylogeny variability are to estimate in Sequences from copy from anonymous Arctostaphylos. single- or low- nuclear genes or nuclear regions using may sequence characterized amplified regions (SCARs) provide means phylogeny and a resolve the to to many tease apart patterns of reticulation in Arctostaphylos. Until then, fascinating questions of polyploidiza- tion, hybrid and ecological speciation, biogeography, and ecology go unanswered remarkable will in this APPENDIX 1 dGenBankac oucherspeci numbers vithv Tien information an cession for nrlTS y D.Thiers He rbarium at San Fra Cisco State U niversity (SFSU), except for Outgroup. & Arbutus menziesii Pursh*, AF086828; Arctous rubra (Rehder E.H.Wilson) Nakai*, AF091 944; Arctous erythrocarpa MO number Small., Russian Siberia, accession 5196245, GQ281006; Comarostaphylis Greene*, AF091947; diversifolia (Parry) Ornithostaphylos AF297794 and AF091962 and oppositifolia (Parry) Small*, (ITS 5.8S), (5.8S ITS Xyiococcus bicolor Nutt*, 1 2); AF091948. A Ingroup. Arctostaphylos andersonii San Mateo CA, USA, & M.CVasey GQ280910; A.Gray, Co., VT.Parker 764, auricutata Eastw., Contra Costa Co., CA, USA, M.CVasey 840, GQ280911; A. australis Eastw., Baja Norte, Mexico, M.CVasey GQ280912; 799, A. Sonoma bakeri Eastw. subsp. bakeri Eastw., Co., CA, USA, M.CVasey GQ28091 Sonoma 71, evis P.V.Wells, A Co., CA, USA, VT.Parker M.CVasey 548, GQ28091 canescens subsp. canescens Marin CA, USA, & M.CVasey Eastw., Co., VT.Parker 4; GQ28091 443, A. canescens subsp. sonomensis Lake CA, USA, M.CVasey GQ28091 (Eastw.) P.V.Wells, Co., 282, A. catalinae 5; 6; & Santa Barbara CA, USA, M.CVasey GQ280917; columbiana Humboldt P.V.Wells, Co., VT.Parker 155, A. Piper, Co., CA, USA, A A M.CVasey GQ280918; & 1030, confertifiora Eastw., Santa Barbara Co., CA, USA, VT.Parker M.CVasey 900, GQ280919; cruzen- Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 3(2) 680 A Sonoma M.CVasey CA, USA, GQ280920; densiflora M.S.Baker, Co., San Obispo CA, USA, VJParker et Roof, Luis Co., al. 12, sis A A & M.CVasey, M.CVasey GQ280922; gabilanensisVT. Parker Monterey CA, USA, 81 GQ280921 edmundsii J.T.Howe!!, Co., 9, 69, ; Adams McMinn, y ex GQ280923; giandulosa subsp. cushingiana (Eastw.) San Benito CA, US 1086, A. Co., A San Diego CA, USA, CA USA MCVasey GQ280924; giandulosa subsp. giandulosa Eastw. Co., Co 1002, (1), Santa Barbara A & M.CVasey GQ280926; San Benito CA, USA, VJ.Parker 456, GQ280925; giandulosa subsp. giandulosa Co., M.CVasey 724, (2), A Angeles GQ280927; g/auca Los M.CVasey WOO, LindL, Angeles CA, USA, A os Co., giandulosa subsp. c A A MCVtaey GQ280929; /j/sp/^fa Santa Cruz CA, USA, 407, M.CVasey809, GQ280928; g/uf/nosa B.Schreib., Co., USA, CA, Co., A Munz, cultivated material; MCVasey GQ280930; hookeri subsp. franciscana (Eastw.) USA, Norte CA, 360, Howeil, Del Co., A (Hoover & Roof) hearstiorum USA, GQ280931; hookeri subsp. Arboretum, Golden Gate San Francisco, CA, Strybing Park, & A Cruz CA, USA, VJ.Parker G.Don, Santa Obispo USA, AF106817; hookeri subsp. hookeri Co., CA, San RV.Wells* Luis Co., A GQ280933; montana Marin CA, USA, Markos613, Zioote- M.CVasey GQ280932; hookeri subsp. (Eastw.) P.V.Wells, Co., 5. A. 55, A M.CVasey Monterey CA, USA, 1050, San Francisco CA, USA, AF1 0681 ftcxjver/ RV.Wells, Co., subsp. raven/7 P.V.Wells*, Co., 9; ri A CA, A M.CVasey GQ280935; /mu/ar/s Greene, Santa Barbara Co., Mateo USA, San CA, GQ280934; imbricata Eastw., Co., 18, A & CA, USA, M.CVasey 756, S.W.Edwards, Keeler-Wolf W.Knight, Siskiyou Co., Anonymous GQ280936; klamathensis USA, s.n., A A (W.Knight & Gankin) GQ280938; M.CVasey malloryi San Obispo CA, USA, 1046, GQ280937; luciana RV.Wells, Luis Co., A bowermanii Contra Costa & GQ280939; manzanita subsp. Roof, Co., M.CVasey PV CA, USA, VJ.Parker 834, Shasta Wells, Co., GQ280941 A M.CVasey Glenn CA, USA, 21 M.CVasey GQ280940; manzanita subsp. elegans (Jeps.) RV.Wells, Co., 6, CA, USA, 169, ; A & MCVtoey GQ280942; manzanita subsp. A Sonoma CA, USA, Itftotef 508, manzanita subsp. glaucescens RV.Wells, Co., Men- manzanita GQ280943; manzanita subsp. Parry M.CVasey Munz, Contra Costa CA, USA, 894, A. (1 faewgaro (Eastw.) Co., ), A Humboldt CA, USA, M.CVasey manzanita GQ280944; manzanita subsp. Co., VJParker&M.CVasey369, docino CA, USA, (2), Co., A manzanita A Amador M.CVasey GQ280946; subsp. manzanita CA, USA, 767, GQ280945; manzanita subsp. Co., 851, (3), A Glenn CA, MCViray GQ280947; manzanita subsp. (Gankin) RV.Wells, Co., Sonoma CA, USA, 424, roo/7/ manzanita Co., (4) A x A A medfo GQ280949; Sonoma M.CVasey x CA, USA, 425, GQ280948; manzon/to stanfbrdlana, Co., M.CVasey883, USA, A Mendocino CA, USA, G.Wahlert M.CVasey GQ280950; mendocinoensis RV.Wells, Co., Mendocino USA, CA, 253, Greene, Co., A Mateo A San GQ280952; montaraensis Roof, Co., GQ280951 mewukka Merriam, Tuolumne Co., CA, USA, M.CVasey 575, s.n., ; A A GQ280954; morroensis M.CVasey GQ280953; montereyensis Hoover, Monterey Co., CA, USA, 656, M.CVasey USA, 743, CA,' A Amador M.CVasey USA, CA, & Obispo USA, Bode GQ280955; myrtifolia Parry, Co., San CA, 823, Wiesl. Schreib., Luis Co., K. B. A CA, A M.CVasey GQ280957; n/ssenana Merriam, Placer Co., 757, GQ280956; nevadensis A.Gra< 733, \, ' A A & M.CVasey 5 GQ280959; ob/s- Mendocino USA, nummutaria CA, VJ.Parker GQ280958; A.Gray, Co., 16, M.CVasey USA, 892, A M.CVasey & Santa Cruz CA, USA, ohloneana Co., M.CVasey GQ280960; V.T.Parker, Monterey CA, USA, 1052, Co., A Bode GQ280962; otayens/s GQ28096 Obispo CA, USA, 780, & M.CVasey *an Luis Co., K. VJParker 1 1 1, A M.CVasey M.CVasey GQ280963; x pacifica Roof, San Mateo Co., CA, USA, 20, & San Diego CA, USA, 748, Wiesl. Schreib., Co., A Alameda & M.CVasey GQ280965; pallida Eastw., A Monterey CA, USA, VJ.Parker 459, GQ280964- pajaroensis J.E.Adams, Co., A A M.CVasey GQ280967; patu- Nevada, USA, Greene White 626, M.CVasey GQ280966; patu/a Pine, Co., CA, USA, 436, Co., (1 ), & M.CVasey GQ280969; USA, Wood GQ2S0968; patula Calaveras Co., CA, VJ.Parker 770, Plumas CA, USA, M. 316, A. (3), Co., 1a (2), A A drupacea Riverside & San Obispo CA, USA, M.CVasey 233, GQ280970; pringlei subsp. Parry, Luis Co., Jeps. Wiesl., p/'/osu/a A A M.CVasey GQ280972; Pima Arizona, USA, 232, M.CVasey GQ280971 subsp. pringlei Parry, Co., USA, pringlei CA, 993, Co., ; & GQ280973; A.pungens HBK San Bernardino Co., CA, USA, M.CVasey terey CA, USA, VJParker 677, (1), Co., GQ280975; A.pungens Pima Arizona, M.CVasey Co., GQ28097 A.pungens San Diego CA, USA, 696, M.CVasey Co., (3), 194, (2), '4; A A GQ280977; rainbowensis CA, USA, VJParker Santa Barbara etai. GQ280976; pur/ss/ma RV.Wells, Co., 2, M.CVasey228, USA, M.CVasey San Mateo CA, USA, Bode GQ280978; regismontana Eastw., Co., &Massihi,San Diego CA, USA,/C 775, A. Co., J.E.Keeley A A & San & M.CVasey GQ280980; rudis Jeps. Wiesl., Luis x Marin CA, USA, VJParker 276, GQ280979; repens J.T.Howell, Co., 557, A A GQ280982; & Marin CA, USA, VJ.Parker 306, M.CVasey GQ280981; sensitiva Jeps., Co., Obispo USA, VJParker 151, Co., CA,' A decumbens & GQ280983; stanfordiana Parry subsp. M.CVasey & Cruz CA, USA, VJParker 865, Santa Jeps. Wiesl., Co., silvicola Mendocino W.Knight, Sonoma M.CVasey GQ280984; stanfordiana Parry subsp. raichei CA, USA, 422, A. (RV.Wells) RV.Wells, Co., A M.CVasey GQ280986; Napa USA, CA, 392, M.CVasey GQ280985; stanfordiana Parry subsp. stanfordiana, Co., CA, USA, 277, Co., A GQ280987; tomentosa subsp. Monterey CA, USA, VJ.Parker 584, tomentosa subsp. Crustacea (Eastw.) RV.Wells Co., A. (1), A Obispo San M.CVasey GQ280988; tomentosa subsp. daciticola RV.Wells, Luis Co., Santa Cruz CA, USA, 786, Crustacea Co., (2), A & M.CVasey USA, Santa Barbara CA, VJ.Parker M.CVasey GQ280989; tomentosa subsp. /nsu//co/a RV.Wells, Co., CA, USA, 1008, A A GQ280991; tomentosa M.CVasey Monterey CA, USA, 822, GQ280990; tomentosa subsp. rosei (Eastw.) RV.Wells, Co., 903, A & M.CVasey GQ280992; tomentosa subsp. subcordata RV.Wells, Santa Barbara Co., CA, USA, VJParker 901, subsp. (Eastw.) A New Ocean USA, VJParker Monterey CA, USA, M.CVasey 245, GQ280993; uva-urs/ (L) Spreng., Co., Jersey, tomentosa Pursh, Co., A A McEaghan GQ280995; Yellows- uva-urs/, SA, 933, GQ280994; uva 437, ] A M.CVasey Gunnison Colorado, USA, & M.CVasey GQ280996; Co., Wyoming, uva-urs/, USA, VJ.Parker 942, tone National Park, A A M.CVasey Washington, USA, 340, GQ280998; Clallam GQ280997; Alaska, USA, J fi/sbop 684, ura-urs/, Co., uva-ursi, 643, 92- A Garden, from Guatemala, U.C. Botanical material cultivated GQ280999; uva-ursi subsp. cratericola (J.D.Smith) RV.Wells, A A GQ281 mariposa (Dudley) RV.Wells, USA, M.CVasey 001 viscida subsp. GQ281 Eastw, Marin CA, 783, 0545, 000; virgata Co., ; M Sonoma M.CVasey (Howe CA, USA, Tuolumne Co CA USA C GQ281 002; A.viscida subsp. pulchella RV.Wells, Co., \/asey 499, 1) 1 . and Wahlert phylogeny Arctostaphylos et ITS al., A GQ281004; er&M.CVasey849, with sequences the "Gray Leaf'haplotype). Forty-four taxa identical nrlTS (i.e., canescens canescens, canescens Arctostaphylos andersonii, A. auricuiata, A. bakeri ssp. bakeri, A. baker! ssp. sublaevis, A. ssp. A. s: glandutosa cushingiana, glandule sonomensis, A. catalinae, A. columbiana, A. confertiflora, A. cruzensis, A. gabilanensis, A. ssp. A. montana, ssp. glaucomollis, A. glauca, A. glutincsa, A. hookeri ssp. franciscana, A. hookeri ssp. A. hookeri ssp. ravenii, A. hooveri, manzanita manzanita manzanita manzanita imbricata, A. insularis, A. luciana, A. ssp. elegans, A. ssp. glaucescens, A. ssp. (1), x tomentosa obispoensis, A. osoensis, A. pajaroensis, A. pallida, A. purissima, A. regismontana, A. repens, A. silvicola, A. ssp. dacitico We and Harvey (Ohio reviewing manuscri] thank Robert Patterson (SFSU) Ballard, University) for this Jr. and an anonymous and providing comments improved David Keil (Cal Poly State University) that r< it. viewer provided helpful commentary that enhanced the paper. Frank Cipriano (Conservation Genetic also SFSU) and provided with sequencing. Oriane Hidalgo (Ohio University Lab, Juniper Scribner assistance translated the abstract into Spanish. Unequal between annual and perennial lineages of checker and 2001 evolutionary rates Andreasen, B.G. Baldwin. K. . Molec rDNA and mallows Malvaceae): evidence from 8S-26S internal externa! transcribed spacers. {Sidalcea, 1 18:936-944. Evol. Biol. 989. Age and origin of chaparral. S.C Keeley, ed.The California chaparral: paradigms reexamined. Axelrod, In D.I. 1 Museum 7-19. Natural History of Los Angeles County, Science Series, no. 34, Los Angeles, CA. Pp. SA nrDNA angiosperm polymorphism, and 2003. Characterization of Hughes. C.D.,T.G. Carr, Harris, C.E. Bailey, and pseudogenes. Molec Phylogen. 29:435-455. paralogy, Evol. DNA RAPDs sequence phy- species CD., Hughes, and 2004. Using to identify loci for level C.E. S.A. Harris. Bailey, logeny reconstruction: an example from Leucaena (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot. 29:4-14. Two and 2005. lineages of Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae) identified using the internal M.C. Boykin, L.M., Vasey, V.T. Parker. genome. Madrono 39-147. transcribed spacer region of the nuclear 52:1 (ITS) L and 2004. Polyploidy Brockmann, C, A.K. Brysting, Alsos, Borgen, H.H. Grundt, A.-C. Scheen, R. Elven. in arctic I.G. -536. Soc. 82:521 plants. Linn. Biol. J. CNPS. 2009. Native Plant Society. Inventory of rare and endangered plants. Online version 7-09a. California <http://cnps.web.aplus.net/cgi-bin/inv/inventory.cgi> on genus based Chemical subdivisions within the Arctostaphylos flavonoid profiles. Experi- Denford, 1981. K.E. 37:1287-1288. entia G.M. and GJ. 981 Systematic studies the Arbuteae (Ericaceae, Vaccinioideae) including a revi- Breckon. in Diggs, 1 . The Wisconsin-Madison, sion of the genus Comarostaphylis. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wl. two the Yosemite region of Hered- Dobzhansky,! 953. Natural hybrids of species of Arctostaphylos in California. 1 7:73-79. ity Paleobotany Four Seasons 2:3-75. 2004. of Edwards, S.W. California. 1 Confidence on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791 985. limits Felsenstein, J. 1 A between and canescens Oregon. 2:83-93. LD. Hybridization Arctostaphylos viscida Brittonia 968. in Gottlieb, 1 American genus Ceanothus (Rhamna- North shrub Hardig,TM, and 2001 Diversification of the Solus, D.E. Soltis. P.S. . DNA and DNA. Amer. 08-1 phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal chloroplast Bot. 87:1 23. ceae): conflicting J. new manzanita from northern San burl-forming and 1994. Arctostaphylos rainbowensis, a A. Massihi. Keeley, J.E. Madrono Diego County, 41:1-1 California. 2. 682 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 3(2) Southern Amer. and 1981. regeneration of California chaparral. Bot. 68: Keeley, J.E. S.C. Keeley. Post-fire J. 524-530. Seed bank and dynamics sprouting and nonsprouting Arctostaphylos and 1990. survival Kelly, V.R. V.T. Parker. in Amer. Midland 124:114-123. species. Naturalist A new W. 985. glandular manzanita the southern inner north coast ranges of California. Four Seasons Knight, in 1 7:17-20. Koontz, A, RS. Soltis, and D.E. Soltis. 2004. Using phylogeny reconstruction to test hypotheses of hybrid origin J 29:345-357. Delphinium Section Diedropetala (Ranunculaceae). Bot. Syst. in DM C and 2002. Phylogenetic Kron, K.A., W.S. Judd, P.R Stevens, Crayn, A.A. Anderberg, P.A. Gadek, J. Quinn, J.L Luteyn. of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Bot. Rev. 68:335-423. classification human and 977. Manzanita {Arctostaphylos) hybrids the Pacific Northwest: effects of natural Kruckeberg, A.R. in 1 2:233-250. disturbance. Syst. Bot. complex Markos, S, LC. Hileman, M.C. Vasey, and Parker. 998. Phylogeny of the Arctostaphylos hookeri (Ericaceae) V.T. 1 based on nrDNA Madrono 87-1 data. 45:1 99. DNA methods and Amer. Olmstead, and 994. Chloroplast systematics: a review of data analysis. R.G. Palmer. J.D. 1 205-1 224. Bot. 81:1 J. two and 2005. Factors contributing to the seed bank size of obligate seeding Ceanothus O'Neil, Parker. S.E. V.T. Madrono 82-1 Northern species California. 52:1 90. newly and M.C. 2004. Arctostaphylos gabilanensis (Ericaceae), a described auriculate-leaved Parker, V.T. Vasey. Madrono manzanita from the Gabilan Mountains, :322-325. California. 51 Raven, and Axelrod. 978. Origin and relationships of the California flora. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 72:1-1 34. P.H. D.I. 1 genus Richardson, Pennington, T.D. Pennington, and P.M. Hollingsworth. Rapid diversification of a species-rich R.T. J.E., 293:2242-2245. Science of Neotropical rain forest trees. new The wine Amer. 82:953-944. Rieseberg, L.H. 1995. role of hybridization in evolution: old in skins. Bot. J. A new chromosome number Canad. 59:272-273. RosattlTJ. 981 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi. Bot. in J. 1 . Sang,T, DJ. Crawford, andT.F. 1995. Documentation of reticulate evolution peonies (Paeonia) using Stuessy. in transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: implications for biogeography and concerted internal 3-681 Proc Acad. 92:681 evolution. Natl. Sci. U.S.A. 7. between Schmid, Mallory, and M.Tucker. 1968. Biosystematic evidence for hybridization Arctostaphylos R.,T. E. J. and nissenana 20:34-43. A. viscida. Brittonia KA, G.L and R.W. Patterson. 992. Morphological and cytological evidence for polyphyletic Schierenbeck, Stebbins, 1 mewukka 87-205. allopolyploidy Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae). Syst. Evol. 79:1 in PI. 1 Swofford, D.L 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b Sinauer 0. 1 MA. Sunderland, Associates, A sequence Wahlert, G.A. 2005. phylogeny of Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal ITS data. San San CA. Master's thesis. Francisco State University, Francisco, mode woody 1969. The between of reproduction and extent of speciation genera of the Wells, relation in P.V. 23:264-267. Evolution California chaparral. Wells, 2000. The manzanitas of California, also of Mexico and the World. Published by the author. P.V. concerted evolution following allopolyploid WendelJ.R, A. Schnabel, andT. Seelanan. 1995. Bidirectional interlocus 92:280-284. speciation cotton (Gossypium). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. in from sequences Whittall, A. and Meinke. 2000. Detecting nucleotide additivity direct a Liston, S. Gisler, R.J. is J., SNAP: example from an Sidalcea (Malvaceae). 2:1-7. Biol. PI.