ebook img

A new species of Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from New Guinea and a redefinition of Litoria leucova (Tyler, 1968) PDF

7 Pages·1994·2.4 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview A new species of Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from New Guinea and a redefinition of Litoria leucova (Tyler, 1968)

A NEW SPECIES OFUTORIA ANURA: HYLIDAE") FROM NEW GUINEA ANDA ( REDEFINITIONOFLITORIA LEUCOVA (TYLER, 1968) G.R.JOHNSTON ANDSJ.RICHARDS Johnston,G.R.&Richards,S.J. 1994 J201;AnewspecksofLituria(Amita. Hylidae)ttoiii NewGuineaandaredefinitionofLitoriaieiicova(Tyler, 1968) MemoirsoftheQueensland Museum37(1): 273-279. Brisbane ISSN 0079-8835. AtpresentLitoriateucova is known from theholotypecollectedat Busilminnearthenorth flowing May River and seven specimens from the south flowing Ok Tcdi in the Stai MountainsofNew Guinea. We show that the specimens from the north andsouthfacesof thecentralmountainsrepresenttwodistinctspecies.Thispaperdescribesthe southerntaxon as Litoriamajikthisesp. nov, andredefinesL teucovaconfiningittothe northerntaxon. Hylidae, Litoriateucova, Litoriamajikthise, newspecies. NewGuinea. GregJohnston, SchoolofBiologicalSciences, Flinders UniversityofSouthAustralia, GPO Hox 2/00, Adelaide, South Australia 5(MX), Australia; Stephen Richards, Department of Zoology,James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland48]/, Australia; 16June 1994. Litoria teucova (Tyler, 1968) was described mencetal., 1984)wasdonetotest fot-significant froma single adult female collected from Busil- multivariatedifferencesinrawmeasurementsbe- minneartheMay Riveronthenorthern slopesof tween the three taxa. the Star Mountains ofPapua New Guinea. Men- Calls were recorded in the field with a SONY kes (1993) redescribed the species based on Professional Walkman easette recorder and an sevenspecimensfromthesouthflowingOkTcdi, Electret Condenser microphone ECM Z200. without reference to the holotype, and placed it Calls were analysed using ULTRASOUND in theLitorianigropunctata species group. vh10(Jordan, 1988). During field workin the Westernand Sandaun Provinces of Papua New Guinea we collected Comparisons specimens which, after comparison with type mbayteMreinalz,iemsad(e19i9t3c)leiasrptohlayttLy.pitce.ucTohveasapsedceifmiennesd basLiistoorfiaftlseiuncgolveafweamasloeriwgiitnha:llIy,dSiVaLgn=os3e0d,o4nmtmh;e Menzies(1993)referredtoL teucovaare notthis 2, an immaculate blue dorsum and stippled blue species but represent an undescribed species. In on thethighs, 3,an eyetonarisdistance less than this paper we report further specimens of L intcrnarial span; 4, no vomerine teeth; 5, an im- teucova and describe and illustrate the new maculateunpigrncnledventralsurface;6,noflash markings in the groin oron posteriorsurfaces of species. thighs; and 7, unpigmented ova (Tyler, 1 M \TERJALS AND METHODS This specimen was collected on the northern slopes ofthe Star Mountains. ThespecimensMenzies (1993 referredtojs t ) Eighi morphometric measurement (in mm) leucovowereall maleandquitedifferentfromthe were made of specimens of Litoria iris, L holotype: they were larger (SVL = 31.0- leucovu and the new species held in the South 35.4mm). mottled on the dorsum, had brigir AustralianMuseum(SAM)and the University of flash markings in the groin and on the hidden Papua New Guinea (UPNG). These measure- surfacesofthethighs, largepurplepatchesonthe mentswere: snout-ventlength(SVL),headwidth ventrolateral surfaces, and possessed vomerine (HW). head length (HL), eye diameter(ED),eye teeth. All of these specimens were from the to narisinterval (EN), inlernarial span (IN), tibia southern slopesofthe Star Mountains length (TL)and footlength(FL) followingTyler Since the holotype was female and all of 11968). Menzies' (1993)specimensweremale,thesedif- Descriptive statistics and a number of mor- ferences may have reflected sexual dimorphism phometric ratios were calculated from these in one species. However, this is unlikely foi a measurements. All measurements and propor- numberofreasons.Firstly,maleAnuraareusual- tions given are for adult males unless otherwise ly smaller than females. The existence of a staled. A discriminant function analysis (Rey- specie* wittl ;i leveisa] ofthis pattern would he 274 MEMOIRSOFTHEQUEENSLANDMUSEUM L.'leucova' were correctly identified. All misidentifiedsouthernfrogswereassignedtothe group representing L iris by the analysis. A L posteriori placement of the type specimen of leucova onto the discriminant functions demonstratedclearlythatitfallswithinthenorth- erncluster, butwelloutside oftheclusters repre- seniing L iris and the southern taxon. On the basisofthismorphologicalanalysisanddifferen- ces in mating call we describe the southern L 'lei4cova' as a new species, and redefine L. leucova (sensu stricto) to include only northern specimens. Litoria majikthise sp. nov. (Figs 1-4) -3-1 -y • a MaterialExamined Holotype: SAMR44093, 6kra SSW Tabubil. rtMANT FUNCTiON I) Western Province. Papua New Guinea, 5'18'S, 141a12*E. G.R. Johnston, S.J. Richards, 10,viU993, FIG. 1. Plot ofindividual Litoria iris(circles), Liiaria male. leucova(triangles)andLitoriamajikthise(squares)on Paratypes: UPNG6734, Megalsimbip, Ok Menga, thefirsttwodiscriminantfunctionaxesbasedonseven Western Province, Papua New Guinea, 5J18*S, measurements. Hollow pentagons=group eentroids. 141°20'E, J.C. Pemetta, viU981; UPNG7305-7309, Hollow star=holotypeofLitorialeucova, Lower Kam valley, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, 5'12'S. 14ri4'E, J. Menzies, i.1985; very unusual, especially in the absence ofmor- UPNG8501-S508, 6km SSW Tabubil, Western phological or behavioural indications chat male Province, Papua New Guinea, 5°18'S, 14l°12*E, S.J. combatisimportantinthisspecies(Shine, 1979). Richards, G.R. Johnston, 28.xi,199l; SAMR44094, Secondly, we have collected a female of the 1km SSW Tabubil. Western Province, Papua New 1 "southern' taxon and found it to be larger than Guinea. 562TS 141'12'E, G.R. Johnston, S.J. males (SVL=39 2mm) but entirely consistent Richards,22.vii 1993;SAMR44095-44101,6kmSSW with them in all other respects. Thirdly, several Tabubil. Western Province, Papua New Guinea, males collected near the type locality of L 5°18'S 141'12'E, G.R. Johnston, S.J. Richards, 9- leucovacorrespondinallrespectstotheholotype PIrO.ovviiin.c1e9,93P;aUpuPaNGN8e6w02G-u0i3ne.a,125k°m22S'STa1bu4briil7.'WEe,stGe.Rr.n of that species, but differ from males of the Johnston, S.J. Richards, l-20.vu.1993. southern taxon in morphology and structure of the mating call. Diagnosis Thus, two separate taxa, from the southern and AmemberoftheLitorianigropuncnituspc northern slopes ofthe Star Mountains, appearto group (Menzies 1972, 1993). Distinguishable be included in Menzies* (1993) concept of L from all other members of this group by the leucova. This hypothesis was tested using a dis- following combination of characters: 1, green criminant function analysis of seven measure- dorsallyinlife:2.srnHit-ventlength30.5-3.S4niiii ments using L iris, the southern and northern L. inadultmales;3, thighsandgroincrimsoninlife; 'leucova' asapriorigroupings(Fig. 1).L Mswas 4, purple speckling on lateral surfaces of belly included in this analysis because phenetically it tending to form patches which do not separate is the species of LUoria most similar to the distinct large, white lateral patches from venter: southern taxon. 5, distinct white postocular spot; 6, call with There were two significant discriminant func- dominantfrequencyof2.5kHz,apulserepetition tions, the first of which accounted for 81.4% of rateof0. 16-0.24pulscs/ms. the variance. All measurements contributed sig- nificantly to decrease Wilk's Lambda. The Description analysis resulted in correct identification of Bodysizesmall(SVL=30.5-35.4mminmales, 93.8%ofspecimensoverall. AllZ,. insandnorth- 39.2mm in a female). Head slightly broader than ern L, 'leucova', and 85.7% of southern long oras broad as long (HL/HW = 0.81-1.03). NEW HYLIDFROG 275 TABLE I. MeasurementsofadultmaleUtoriairis> L. faces of hindlimbs, concealed parts of thighs, itucovaandL.majikthise. Valuesarcmeans(standard groin and in some specimens much of the belly deviations).Themeasurementsaredefinedinthetext. pale pink Lateral surfaces of throat and body P=probabilities associated with oneway ANOVAs with blue-grey stippling, sometimes developing comparing thetaxa. intolargedarkpatchesinthe groinandonthroat. ' Some stippling may also occur on the posterior Character mt.ajikthise L iris L teucava P surface of thighs. A distinct, broad white pos- (N=I4) (N=I3) (N^5) tocular bar between eye and foielimb, rum SVL 32.7(1.659) 31.4(3.111) 26.1(0.391) 0.000 belowthetympanum. HW 9.8(0.395) 9.5(0.647) 8.8(0.363) 0.006 Inlifedorsalsurfacesimmaculatedarkgreenor HL 8.9(0.622) 8.1 (0.806) 7.6(0.466) 0.003 pale emerald green with darker green mottling. ED 4.0(0.412) 3.6(0.456) 3.0(0.164) 0.000 Ventral surfacesgenerally white;ventralsurfaces of hindlimbs and belly red. Lateral surfaces of EN 3.0(0.283) 2.6(0.166) 2.3(0.123) 0.000 throatandbody speckledwithpurple,sometimes tN 3.frilJ 1K1> 3.5(0.420) 2.7(0.205) 0.000 developing into large dark purple patches in the Tl. 18.4(0.547) 18.2(1.719) 14.2(0.383) 0.000 groin and on throat. Stippling also present on posteriorsurface ofthighs in some specimens A Head length about one quarter of body length distinct broad, pearl-white postocular bar. be- (HL/SVL = 0.24-0.29). Snout prominent, round tweeneyeandforearm,belowtympana. Irisgold when viewed from above and slightly round to en yellow. truncate in profile. Nostrils lateral. Eye-to-naris Measuretnents of holotype (in mm). SVL = distance less ih;m or equal to inlernarial span 34.0;HL =9.0;HW= 10.8;ED= 43:EN =3.I: iEN/IN =0.72-1.03). Nostrilsmuchclosertoend IN =3,9;TL= 18.7; FL= 231, ofsnoutthaneye Canthusrostralisrounded,con- caveand slightlyto well defined. Eyes large and MatingCall protuberant, eye diameter generally greater than Two types ofCall are uttered (Fig. 4B.D). One 0d.i9s7t-a1n.c5e5)f.roTmymepyeantuomnosctorvielrenodstwriilth(sEkDi/n,ENon=e hia$russhho'rchii{p2'6-co8n0siims,tminegano=f46(-3,1S6Dpu=lsIe8s.0(6m\eNa=n7)=. thirdtoonehalfofeyediameter. Vomerineteeth 8.9, SD = 3.29) It a pulse rule of0.20-0.24 pul- on two slight elevations between the choanae. ses/ms(mean=0.22,SD=0.013).Thisshortcall Tongue broad andoval in shape. beginsat 2.2-3.2kHzand finishesat 1.4-4.3kH7„ hungers short with moderate lateral fringes; bui has a dominant frequency around 2.5kH7 finger lengths 3>4>2>l. Terminal discs large. Thesecond longer(29Q-360m.s, mean =330, SD Webbingtosubarticulartubercleatbaseofpenul- =36.1, N = 3)call is a harsh *raagh\ incre*iMng timate phalanx of fourth finger. Hindlimbs in volume, consisting of 49-63 pulses (mean = moderately long (TL/SVL = 0.53-0-60); toe 57.3, SD= 737)at a rate of0.16-0.19 pulses/ms lengths 4>3>5>2>1. Webbing between toes to mean=0.174,SD=0.010).Thislongcallbegins I base ofdisc on all toes, except fourth and fifth at 1.8-2.2krteand ends at l.8-5.0kHz, but has a Webbing on fourth toe to base of penultimate dominantfrequencyaround2.5kHz.Anumberof phalanx. Webbing on fifth loe reaches midway individualfrogswerebeardtoutterbothshortand alongpenultimatephalanx,continuingtodiscvia longcalls(including theholotype). Twentycalls a narrow fringe. A small, oval inner metatarsal uttered by fourindividualsgave a meancallrate tuberclepresent; noouter metatarsal tubercle. of one per 26s. All calls were recorded at Skin of dorsal surfaces minutely tubercular temperaturesof21.0to22.2C. Throatandchestslightly granular. Fewtubercles onposteriorsurfaceofforearmandouteredgeof Etymology each foot. Few conspicuous tubercles on From Majikthise a farcical comedycharacter ' ventromedial surfaces of thighs, below anus. (Adams. 1979). referring to the vividly coloured Posteriorsurfaceofthighsgenerally smooth, but thighs and groin. interrupted by few large tubercles. Supratym- panic fold inconspicuous. DiSTRJBLTIONAND HABITAT In preservative dorsal surfaces immaculate Known only from altitudes between 550 and blue (one specimen) or densely mottled with 650m in theheadwatersofthe soMtl draining Ok darker blue (all other specimens). Ventral sur- Tedi in the StarMountains. Specimens werecol- faces generally cream to white, but ventral sur- lectedatnightonfoliageattheedgeofcultivated ; 276 MEMOIRSOFTHEQUEENSLANDMUSEUM MaterialExamined Holotype: SAMR6461, Busilmin, Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea, 4*55'S 141'00'E, B. Craig, 1.v.1965,female. OtherMaterial:SAMR44091-44092,UPNG8604- 06, Stolle Mountain, Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea, 4#48*S 141'39'E, G.R. Johnston, S.J. Richards,4.vii.1993. Diagnosis Distinguishable from all other Papua New GuineanLitoriabythefollowingcombinationof characters: 1,Greendorsallyinlife;2,Snout-vent length30.5-35.4mminadultmales;3,thighsand groin translucent pink with yellow spots in life; 4,nopurplespecklingonlateralsurfacesofbelly 5, no white postocular spot; 6, calls with dominant frequency of 4.0-5.0kHz, a pulse repetitionrateof0.11 pulses/ms. Description Bodysizesmall (SVL=30.5-35.4mminmales, 30.4mm in a female). Head slightly longer than broad (HL/HW=0.81-0.91). Head length about one third of body length (HL/SVL=0.26-0.31). Snout not prominent, round when viewed from above and truncate in profile. Nostrils lateral. Eye-to-naris distance less than internarial span (EN/IN=0.78-0.96). Nostrils closer to end of snout than to eye, Canthus rostralis straight and slightly defined. Eyes moderate in size, not prominent.Eyediameterfractionallygreaterthan distancefromeyeto nostril(ED/EN=1.25-1.43). Tympanum visible, one half of eye diameter. Vomerine teeth absent. Tongue oval in shape withstrongly indentedposteriorborder. Fingers short withbroad lateral fringes; finger lengths3>4>2>1.Terminaldiscslarge.Webbing to subarticular tubercle at base of penultimate phalanx of fourth finger. Hindlimbs long and slender (TL/SVL=0.53-0.55); toe lengths 4>5>3>2>1. Webbing between toes to base of disconalltoes,exceptfourth.Webbingonfourth reacheshalfwayuppenultimatephalanxandcon- FIG.2.A,B,Litoriamajikthise;C,Litorialeucova.A,C, nectedtodiscbybroadlateralfringe. Small,oval lateralviews;B,ventralview. inner metatarsal tubercle present; no outer sago swamps, among grasses in uncultivated metatarsaltubercle. swampsandonvegetationalongaroadsideditch, Skin of dorsal surfaces smooth, except for allwithin 15kmofthetownshipofTabubil.Perch weakly tubercularuppereyelids.Throatsmooth. heights varied between 1.0m and2.5m. Chest and anterior portion of abdomen, and ventral surfaces of thighs granular. Large Litoria leucova(Tyler, 1968) prominenttubercleson ventromedial surfacesof (Figs 1-4) thighs, below anus. Supratympanic fold prominent, extending from posterior corner of HylaleucovaTyler, 1968: 119. eye, covering upperrimoftympanic annulus. 1 NEW HYLID FROG 277 cleared swampandfromvegetationoverhanging a swift-flowing stream at 1600m altitude. COMPARISON OFUTORIA LEVCOVA mTWLMAJIKTHfSE Uloriuleucova issmallerand therefore differs in most absolute body measurements from L majikihise (Table 1). The correlations between the measurementsandthediscriminantfunctions indicate that, apart from its smaller size, L leucovahasalongerhead, moreprominentsnout and smaller eyes than L majikthtse. Vomerine teeth ai>; absent in L leucova but present in L majikihise. FIG. 3. A, Ltioria majikihise; B, /* iris. Ventral view The two species also differ in colour (Fig. 2). showing thatthe purple (black)ofL majikthtsedoes In life the presence ofcrimson red in the groin not separate distinct white lateral patches from the andonthethighsinLmajikthtseclearlydifferen- remainderofthe venlerasit docs in Z- iris. tiates it fromL leucova, in which the thighsarc In preservative dorsal surfaces immaculate translucentpinkwithyellow spots.However, this dark blue. Ventral surfaces white. Hidden sur- difference is lessclearinpreservedspecimensas faces of the thighs stippled with dark blue; this the crimson colour of L majikihise fades. The stippling isabsentfrom numeroussmall circular presence ofpurple stippling on the ventrolateral areassothatgroundcolourappears ntheformof surfacesofthebodyclearlydistinguishL majik i circularspots. Subanal tuberclescreamishwhite. thisefromL leucova,inwhichtheventralsurface In lifedorsal surfacespaleemeraldgreen with is white. All but one specimen of L majikihise occasional paler green spots on some in- was strongly mottled dorsally, whereas L dividuals.. Ventral surfaces generally white leucova is generally immaculate pale greendor- Thighs and anterior lateral surfaces translucent sally with the occasional paler spot on some pink with yellow spots. Insgolden yellow individuals. TheonlyL majikihise tolackdorsal mottling wasdark greenon rhedorsum A pearly Mating Call white postocularspotis present in L. majikthtse. Two types ofcall were uttered (Fig.4A,C). One but absent in L Jeuroxa isashort(15-20ms,N=23),harsh 'chip' consisting ThecallsofL leucovahave ahigherdominant of a single pulse. This short call begins at 3.5- frequency (4-5kHz) than those of L majikihise 60kHz for 10-15ms, then broadens to 2.0-6.0kHz. (2-3kHz). Both species utter distinct short and for the last 5ms. The dominant frequency was 4- longcalls. TheshortcallsofL leucovaconsistof 5kHz.TTiesecondlonger(90ms,N=lKailisaharsh asingle pulseand are 15-20mslong, whereas the raagh\ consisting of 10 pulses at a rate of 0.1 shortcallsofLmajikihiseconsistsof6-16pulses pulses/ms. This call began with three pulses be- and are 26-80rrts long. A single long call of L tween 4.0 and 5.5kHz, followed by nine pulses leucova consisted of 10 pulses and was 90ms between 2.0 and 5.5kHz.The dominant frequency long, whereas the long call ofL majikihise w<js was 4.0-5.0kHz for the first nine pulses and then longer (290-360ms) and contained more pulses shifted to 2.0-3.0kHz for the last pulse. Two in- (49-63). L. leucova calls at a much faster rate (1 dividuals were heard to utter both short and long call/2.6s) than does L. nuijikthise(1 call/26s), so calls in long, series. Twenty four calls by a single that it is difficult to know whether the series of frog gaveamean call rateofoneper2.6s forshort short and long calls uttered by L leucova is a Callsandonecallper60sforlongcalls.Callswere series of separate mating calls or a single call recordedata temperatureof 17.6C. consistingofthese subunits. Utorialeucovaoccursatmuchhigheraltitudes Distributionand Habitat (1600m) than docs L. majikihise (550-650m). Knownonlyfromtwolocalitiesonthenorthern They may also differ in habitat preferences; L slopesofthecentral mountains. Specimens were magikthisewasfoundinswampsoralongasmall, collected while they called from piles of socks slow-flowing creek, whereas L. lateova was overhanging streams running into a recently found calling from streams flowing through ••> 1 , 27H MEMOIRSOFTHE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM ia]A B clearly distinguishLable from theharsh 'chip' ora harsh 'raagh* of majikthise (Menzies, 1993; pers. obs.). * COMPARISONOFLITORIA LEUCOVA WITHOTHERSPECIES OFLITORIA Tyler & Davies (1978) placed L leucova in a 0-1 B monotypicspeciesgroup,definedbybeingsmall o uniformlygreen, montane frogs, withshort, half- wehbed fingers, fully webbed toes and unpig- mentcdcggs.Tyler(1968)notedthatthegranules on the ventral surface of the holotype of L leucovatend toformtransverseridges.Examina- tion of the type and live specimens suggest that this characteristic is an artefact of preservation u H and not a structural feature ofthe frogs themsel- 0.1 0.5 ves. TIME(seconds! The only other species of similar size to L leucova which lay unpigmented eggs include FILG.ma4j.iSktohniasge,rahmolsootyfpcea.llUsp.pAe,rC:,sLhiotrotrciaalll.eLucoowvea;rBl.oDn,g aslolmmeemmbeemrbserosfothfetLhebL.ecnkiigrgorpouunpct(asetnasgurToyulpearn&d call. Note thai the scales on the abscissae differ be- Davies, 1978).SpeciesintheL.beckigroupdiffer tween panel Dandallotherpanels. ftotn L leucova in having long unwebbed (vs short 1/3 webbed) fingers and a ventral surface clearedareathathaduntilrecently beenaswamp variegated with dark pigments (vs white). L and along a well vegetated, swiftly flowing leucova is similar to members of the L becki stream. group in that it has been found along a swiftly flowing mountain stream, but some L. leucova COMPARISON OFUTORIA MAJ1KTHISE werecollected from small streamswhich flowed WITH OTHER SPECIESOFLITORIA through what had recently been a swamp. Thus the true habitat preferences of L leucova are Litoria majikthise has purple ventolateral difficult toassess. patches in common with L iris and L ollauru Of the species belonging to the L. (Menzies. 1993), and which distinguishes these nigropunctata group, L leucova differs from L. three species from all other species of Litoria. havma Menzies, 1993, L macro Menzies, 1993 The purple patches ofL majikthise are smaller andLpronimia Menzies, 1993 inthatmaleslack than those in L. tris, and do not separate distinct a rostral spike (Menzies, 1993). L. vocivincens large, white lateral patches from the venter as in Menzies, 1972 occurs only on the southern L iris (Fig. 3). L. majikthise has crimson in the lowlandsofNewGuinea andthehiddensurfaces groinandonthethighs,whereasLirishasyellow ofthethighsareblack(vspink)(Menzies, 1972). toorangeandL oliauro hasorange(Tyler, 1962, L oliauro and L. iris have large purple ventral Menzies, 1993). patches, which L. leucova lacks (Tyler, 1962; In the Ok Tedi area L iris occur within 20 Menzies, 1993). Dorsally L nigropunctata kilometres of L majikthise (Hyndman & Men- (Meyer. 1874) is usually brown orgreen-brown zies, 1990), but L iris is a montane species and (vs pale green) and the hidden surfaces of the occurs at much higher altitudes (1300-2300m; thighs of arc black (vs pink) (Menzies, 1972). Tyler,1968) than does L majikthise, Litoria chloronata (Boulenger, 1911) is the Comparison ofthe call of L. majikthise with species which mostcloselyresemblesL. leucova thm of /. iris (based on Menzies, 1972, 1993) in the L. nigropunctatagroups, but it's call has a show nodifferences in the fundamental frequen- lower dominant frequency (2.6kHz) than L. cy, but thepulserateis lowerinL. iris(0.09-0.1 leucova and the concealed surfaces ofthe thighs pulses/ms) than in L. majikthise (0,16-0.24 pul- andgroinarebrightorange(Menzies, 1993). The ses/ms). Menzies (1975) described the call ofL only species in the L. nigropunctata group that iris as a slow buzzing or spluttering which is occurat altitudes higher than 1000m is L.iris, NHW HYLIDFROG 279 Litorialeucovadiffers frommostcongeners in lyse calls Our work in New Guinea could not lacking vomerine teeth. Litoria chloronata and have been done without the help of Roselyn someL irissharethelackofvomerine teeth with Busasa (Institute ofPapua NewGuineaStudies) L leLucova (Tyler, 1962, 1968)as dom&embersof DrNavu Kwapena (Department ofEnvironment the bicolor species group (Tyler Davies, andConservation,PNG),andDrsJamesMenzies 1978). Litoria leucova differs from all members and Ian Burrows (University of Papua New ofthe L bicolorgroup in being of more robust Guinea). Dr Margaret Davies and Mike Tyler habitus, and having unpigmented eggs. commentedon the manuscript. Litorialeucovasharesfeaturesincommonwith members of both the L becki and the L LITERATURECITED & nigropunctataspecies groups ofTyler Davies (1978). Unfortunately, neither of these groups canbedefinedbyasinglesynapomorphy andare ADAMS, A. 1979 "The hitch-hiker's guide to the , galaxy' (Pan Ltd: London.) almostcertainly not monophyletic. Indeed, there HUTCHINSO• N. M.N & MAXSON, L.R. 1987 is little correspondence between hypothesised Phylogcnetie relationshipsamong Au^ualian wee rmeolratpihoonslhoigpsicaamlon(gTyspleecries&ofDLaivtioerisa,ba1s9e7d8o)n. mfruongoslo(gAincuarla:aHpyplriodaaceh:. PAeulsotdrraylaidainnacJ)o:urannalimof k(aHruytocthyipniscon(K&ingM,ax19s8on1),an19d8i7m).muWnoelohgaivcealtednattaa- HYNDZMooAlNog.yD3.5:C6&1-M74E.NZIES,J.I. 1990.Rainforests tively referred L majikthise to the L of the Ok Tcdi headwaters. New Guinea: an nigropunctata group because of its obvious ecological analysis. Journal ofBiogeography 17; similaritytoL. iris,aspecieswhichhaslongbeen 241-273. included in this group (Menzies, 1972, 1993). JORDAN, B. 1988. 'Ultrasound vl.10'. (Queensland TheaffinitiesofL. leucovaare lessclearandwill University: St Lucia). only be resolved by a thorough pbylogfinetic KING, M. 1981. A cytotaxonomic analysis of analysis of this speciose genus based upon all A1u6s9t-r1a7l5i.anIhnylBiadnkfsr,ogsC.of&theMagretinnu,s ALi.tAoria(.edPsp)., available data. 'Proceedings of the Melbourne HerpetolopL-a. Symposium May 19-21, 1980'. (Zoological Comparative Material Examined BoardofVictoriaand Royal MelbourneZoologi- litoria ins: UPNG4434, 4478-79. Moiyakabip, Hin- calGardens Parkville. Melbourne). dBeankobnearbgipR;anUgPeN;G2UIP0N1G,23M1ar8g,ariUu.PrN.GU7P3N1G32-17I37I-K MENZIES, J. 197:2. Papuan tree frogs of the Litoria 2158, 2241-2281, Nipa; UPNG3115-3135, Tan; nigropunctatagroup. Herpetologica28: 291-300. UUPPNNGG33814540-,31T7a8,mbKuolm;o;UPUNPGN8G2386974-,905,52HU,baMiegnudbki 19a9n3.dSityssatlelmieastiincsNoefwLiGtuoirnieaairainsd(Aannuortae:oHnylsiedxauea:l) Lodge; UPNG6992-3, 7168, 7655, Ml Gilewc; dimorphism in the group. Australian Journai oi Zoology 14:225-255. UUPPNNGG75082132--7I032.4,5A8n9g8a-5l9i0m3p,caHmapl;alUiPnNjGa7v1i4a8-N7i1p6a7;, REYMENT.R.A., BLACKJTH, RE &CAMPBELL, Porgcra; SAM524I, Okapa; SAM5423, 5874. N.A. 1984. 'Multivariate morphometries*. 2nd Telefomin; SAM5726, Dumun. Edn, (Academic Press * London), SHLNE, R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimor- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS phism in the Amphibia. Copeia 1979: 297-306. TYLER. M.J. 1962. A new hylid frogfrom theCc Highlands ofNew Guinea. Recordsofthe South Thiswork wassupportedinpartbygrantsfrom Australian Museum 14: 253-257. the PeterRankinTrustFundforHerpetology and 1968. Papuan hylid frogs of the genus Hyla, James Cook University. Ok Tedi Mining Ltd Zoologixche Verhandelingen96:1-203. provided accomodation, transport and logistic TYLER, M.J. & DAVTES, M. 1978. Species-groups support in the field. Phil and Sue Gregory, and within the Australopapuan hylid frog genus KcytFischerprovidedadditional assistance. Ken Litoria Tschudi. Australian Journal of Zoology Sandersonallowed us to use his software to ana- Supplementary Scries63:1-47.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.