ebook img

A Historical Perspective on Evidence-Based Immunology PDF

367 Pages·2015·27.356 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview A Historical Perspective on Evidence-Based Immunology

Dedication This book is dedicated to • Students, past, present, and future; and • My wife, Jane Adrian, who provided encouragement, enthusiastic support, and confidence in this project. Without her the book would never have been completed. A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE-BASED IMMUNOLOGY E J. M , P d dward oticka h Professor and Chair, Basic Medical Sciences School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona A.T. Still University Mesa, AZ, USA AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • CAMBRIDGE • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEWYORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Elsevier Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein. ISBN: 978-0-12-398381-7 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress For Information on all Elsevier publications visit our website at http://store.elsevier.com/ Publisher: Janice Audet Acquisition Editor: Linda Versteeg-Buschman Editorial Project Manager: Mary Preap Production Project Manager: Julia Haynes Designer: Mark Rogers Typeset by TNQ Books and Journals www.tnq.co.in Foreword Students and others initiating the study of immunol- • The discovery by two hematology fellows, ogy are confronted with numerous details about the William Harrington and James Hollingsworth, immune system and immune responses that need to be that idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura is an assimilated into their knowledge base. These details are autoimmune disorder produced by antibodies currently accepted by the community of immunologists; specific for the patient’s platelets. however, upon initial publication, the experiments and • Georges Köhler was a postdoctoral fellow in César supporting data often engendered controversy. Exam- Milstein’s laboratory when these two scientists ples include the notion that the lymphocyte is the pri- developed the technique leading to the production mary immunocompetent cell, the validity of the clonal of monoclonal antibodies. selection theory and its displacement of instruction theo- • Immunology is a young discipline. While anecdotal ries, the role of central lymphoid organs (thymus, bursa evidence existed for millennia that recovery from of Fabricius, bone marrow) in maturation of immuno- an infectious disease protects an individual from competent B and T lymphocytes, and the requirement subsequent development of the same disease, the for cell interactions in the initiation of effective adaptive study of immunology as a scientific and clinical immune responses. Without some knowledge of the discipline dates from the late eighteenth century. background to these facts, the student misses out on the • The reach of immunology into medicine has evolved rich history and compelling stories that bring immunol- from attempts to prevent infectious disease to a ogy to life. It is to provide a sample of these stories that discipline that is intimately involved in virtually A Historical Perspective on Evidence Based Immunology was every aspect of contemporary medicine. written. The idea for this book had a long gestation. As a Several realities about immunology and immunologi- graduate student, I enrolled in an immunochemistry cal research emerged during the preparation of this book: course taught by Alfred Nisonoff at the University of • Immunology is an international endeavor. Scientists Illinois, Chicago. His approach to teaching included and clinicians from six of the seven continents reading the primary literature, discussing the experi- performed experiments and observations that are ments performed and the conclusions reached, and included in this volume. determining what might be the next experiment to pur- • Students and postdoctoral fellows produce a sue. This course took place in the late 1960s shortly after significant number of findings including the the establishment of the basic structure of the immu- following: noglobulin molecule. The journal articles read in this • George Nuttall’s description of a serum substance course led eventually to division of the heavy and light (antibody) induced in rabbits injected with Bacillus chains of immunoglobulin into constant and variable anthracis that killed the bacteria. At the time Nut- regions. This, in turn, was critical for determining the tall was a medical student in Germany. genetic makeup of the molecule and the mechanisms • Jacques Miller’s discovery, shortly after receiving responsible for generation of diversity of both immu- his PhD, that the thymus plays a critical role in the noglobulins and T cell receptors. maturation of lymphocytes responsible for fight- In 2011, my wife and I visited the Walter and Eliza ing infections. Hall Institute for Medical Research in Melbourne, Aus- • Bruce Glick’s observation during his graduate tralia, where we spent a fabulous afternoon discuss- training that the bursa of Fabricius in chickens is ing immunology with Jacques Miller. Following this required for the maturation of antibody-forming experience, the desire to proceed with this volume was lymphocytes. reenforced. • Don Mosier’s experiments while a medical student In addition to Drs Nisonoff and Miller, I am indebted to demonstrating that optimal antibody production several other individuals who provided encouragement for requires both plastic adherent cells (macrophages) the project and/or read various chapters prior to publica- and plastic nonadherent cells (lymphocytes). tion. These include J. John Cohen, MD; David Scott, PhD; xi xii FOREWORD Max Cooper, MD, PhD; Katherine Knight, PhD; Jay and commented on virtually every chapter. Our Crutchfield, MD; Sharon Obadia, DO; Robin Pettit, PhD; discussions improved the accuracy of the information Milton Pong, PhD; and Katherine Brown, PhD. I also contained although any errors of fact or omission are thank the deans at A.T. Still University including Drs Doug the authors alone, Wood, Thomas McWilliams, Kay Kalousek, and Jeffrey • the editors, Mary Preap, Julia Haynes, and Morgan who provided me the time to pursue this activity. Linda Versteeg-Buschman for their patience and Other individuals critical to the successful completion encouragement, and of this project include the following: • my wife, Jane Adrian, EdM, MPH. Jane read the entire manuscript several times and we discussed • the librarians at Arizona State University and A.T. it extensively. During these discussions, she Still University particularly Catherine Ryczek who advocated for students and encouraged clarity in the tirelessly filled my numerous requests for copies of description of the experiments and the interpretation journal articles from both the United States and the of their results. Without her scientific expertise as a rest of the world, clinical laboratory scientist, her skill as an educator, • David Gardner, PhD, geneticist/molecular biologist, and her experience as a published author, this book a colleague and a good friend who patiently read would not have been possible. Glossary of Historical Terms Investigators often assigned unique names for identical Helper peak 1 (HP-1)—IL-1 structures or molecules. This dichotomy of terms is confusing Hepatocyte-stimulating factor—IL-1 for students as they read some of the older literature. To assist Horror autotoxicus—a hypothesis proposed by Paul Ehrlich in understanding these older terms, this glossary provides a that the immune system was incapable of producing patho- list of several of these terms with contemporary equivalents. logical reactions to self (autoimmune disease) 19S gamma globulin—IgM Hybridoma growth factor—IL-6 7S gamma globulin—IgG Immunokörper—immune body—German term used for Alexin—an original term for complement antibody Amboceptor—an original term for an antibody that bound to Interferon β-2—one of the original designations of IL-6 a pathogen and to complement (alexin) thereby destroying I —immune response gene(s); genes to which immune response the pathogen R are linked; counterpart of class II genes Arthus reaction—a skin reaction originally induced by repeated I —immune suppressor genes; genes thought to code for sup- injections of horse serum into rabbit skin. The skin reaction S pressive factors synthesized and secreted by T suppressor is due to formation of antigen–antibody complexes that lymphocytes activate the complement system and induce inflammation. Killer cell helper factor—IL-2 B cell-activating factor (BAF)—name given to a culture super- Ly antigens—antigens expressed on mouse lymphocytes used natant that activated B lymphocytes in vitro: IL-1 to develop polyclonal antibodies allowing characterization B cell-differentiating factor (BCDF)—a factor in culture super- of subpopulations of T lymphocytes natants that induces antibody synthesis but not mitosis in B Lymphocyte-activating factor (LAF)—IL-1 lymphocytes: IL-6 Pfeiffer phenomenon—the killing of Vibrio cholerae in the guinea B cell growth factor—a factor in culture supernatants that pig peritoneal cavity when the microbe is injected along with induces mitosis in B lymphocytes: IL-4 antibody specific for V. cholerae. An early demonstration of B cell-stimulating factor 1—IL-4 complement activity. B cell-stimulating factor 2—IL-6 Phylocytase—antibody Cluster of differentiation (CD)—a system of nomenclature for Prausnitz-Küstner (P-K) reaction—demonstration of type I molecules expressed primarily on peripheral blood white (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity induced by passive transfer blood cells originally devised by an international workshop of serum from an allergic to a nonallergic individual. on Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens. Initially it Reagin—term used to describe the antibody responsible for was used to classify monoclonal antibodies produced by type I hypersensitivity; IgE different laboratories. Over 300 different CD markers are currently recognized. Schick test—a skin test devised to determine if a patient has sufficient antibody to protect against infection with Copula—something that connects; used to refer to the molecule Corynebacterium diphtheriae that connects a pathogen with complement—antibody Schultz–Dale reaction—in vitro assay to study type I hypersen- Costimulator—an early term for antibody sitivity. Uterine smooth muscle removed from a sensitized CTLA4—cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4; CD152 guinea pig is exposed in vitro to the sensitizing antigen. Desmon—an early term for antibody The amount of muscle contraction is proportional to the Dick test—a skin test used to determine if an individual is degree of sensitization. immune to scarlet fever. Toxin from a culture of Streptococcus Secondary T cell-inducing factor—IL-2 pyogenes is injected intradermally. A positive test, character- Substance sensibilisatrice—antibody ized by an erythematous reaction within 24 h, indicates the T4—antigen expressed by helper lymphocytes; now CD4 individual is not immune to the pathogen. T8—antigen expressed by cytotoxic lymphocytes; now CD8. Fixateur—a substance (antibody) that connects a pathogen with complement T cell growth factor (TCGF)—IL-2 xiii xiv GLOSSARY OF HISTORICAL TERMS T cell-replacing factor—IL-1 Zwischenkörper—“between body”; antibody T cell-replacing factor 3 (TRF-III)—IL-1 β2A—original definition of IgA antibody based on electrophoretic T cell-replacing factor-μ—IL-1 mobility T lymphocyte mitogenic factor—IL-2 γ-globulin—IgG Thymocyte-stimulating factor (TSF)—IL-2 γ-M—IgM C H A P T E R 1 Innate Host Defense Mechanisms and Adaptive Immune Responses O U T L I N E Introduction 1 Adaptive Immune Responses 5 Anatomy 5 Innate Defense Mechanisms 1 Lymphocytes of the Adaptive Immune Anatomy 2 Response 6 Cells of the Innate Host Defenses 2 Effector Mechanisms 6 Antimicrobial Molecules 3 Recognition of Pathogens 7 Effector Mechanisms 3 Inflammation 3 Conclusion 7 Phagocytosis 4 References 7 Complement 4 NK Lymphocyte-mediated Cytotoxicity 4 Time Line 8 Recognition of Pathogens 4 INTRODUCTION system to arise comprises innate or naturally occurring mechanisms. The components of this system are found in All multicellular life forms, including plants, inverte- plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. The second system, brates, and vertebrates, have devised defense strategies the adaptive immune response, evolved in vertebrates that permit individuals to lead a healthy, relatively dis- after divergence from the invertebrate lineage, about ease-free life. Knowledge about the mechanisms that have 500 million years ago. Interactions between the innate evolved to protect humans derives initially from anec- host defenses and the adaptive immune responses are dotal evidence that recovery from diseases such as small- generally successful in eliminating potential pathogens. pox or the plague protects the individual from developing This chapter compares innate host defenses with the same disease a second time. The acceptance of Louis adaptive immune responses as they function indepen- Pasteur’s germ theory of disease in the mid-nineteenth dently and interdependently to eliminate potential century resulted in the concept of an immune response pathogens. The chapter reviews the historical evidence whose function is to provide this protection. Over the that provides the foundation for understanding the ensuing 150 years, many studies have addressed how immune system and how the defense mechanisms at our bodies deal with both pathogenic and nonpathogenic times defend us and at other times harm us. microbes in our environment. Analysis of these mecha- nisms, and the ability to manipulate them to our advan- tage, constitutes the discipline of immunology. INNATE DEFENSE MECHANISMS Two separate but interrelated host defense systems have evolved to defend the individual from attack by Most potential pathogens are defeated by innate host potential pathogens. In this text, pathogen is used in its defense mechanisms. Innate host defenses include phys- broadest sense to refer to any external agent that can ical barriers such as the skin and the mucous membranes cause disease (pathology). Evolutionarily the first defense along the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary 1 A Historical Perspective on Evidence-Based Immunology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398381-7.00001-0 © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2 1. INNATE AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY tracts, nonspecific cells such as macrophages and granu- performed by these structures remained unappreciated locytes, molecules including mediators of inflammation until general acceptance of the germ theory of disease and proteins of the complement system, and effector in the second half of the nineteenth century. The devel- mechanisms such as phagocytosis and inflammation. opment of the germ theory is generally credited to John Recognition of a pathogen by the cells of this innate Snow (1813–1858) who in 1849 studied an outbreak of defense system results in the release of an array of anti- cholera in London and traced it to a water well on Broad microbial molecules, such as lysozyme and defensins Street. Experimental proof of the germ theory was pro- into the local environment. These molecules kill a vari- vided by Louis Pasteur (1822–1895). He demonstrated ety of pathogenic microorganisms and are involved in that microbes were responsible for fermentation of beer enhancing ongoing inflammatory responses, a major and wine as well as spoilage of beverages such as milk. effector mechanism of the innate system. He extended these observations to reveal that human Innate host defense mechanisms and adaptive and animal diseases could also be caused by microbes immune responses differ in three important characteris- (Pasteur, 1880). Once the ubiquity of microorganisms tics in their response to pathogens: was recognized, the interaction between the skin and mucous membranes with the environment became an • Cells of the innate host defenses are poised to area of biological research. respond immediately while the cells of the adaptive The presence of cilia on mucous membranes provides immune response require activation. an additional barrier to the breaching of these surfaces • Innate host defense mechanisms are not specific by pathogens. Cilia and the presence of mucous enhance while adaptive immune responses produce cells and the protective function of these barriers by increasing the molecules that are highly specific for and target the challenge for microbes attaching to and penetrating these pathogen. membranes. Several antimicrobial substances, including • Innate host defense mechanisms lack memory of lysozyme, phospholipase-A, and defensins, are found past responses should the host be invaded a second in secretions on these physical barriers. Lysozyme and time by the same pathogen while adaptive immune phospholipase-A are present in tears, saliva, and nasal responses display memory by mounting a more secretions while defensins and lysozyme are present rapid response, resulting in an increased number of along the mucous membranes lining the respiratory and specific lymphocytes and a higher titer of antibodies gastrointestinal tracts. to a second exposure. Cells of the Innate Host Defenses Inflammation and phagocytosis are the two primary effector mechanisms by which the innate host defense Three cell types provide protection against potential system eliminates pathogens. Macrophages, a major pathogens in the innate host defense system: phagocytic cell, migrate throughout the body, recog- • granulocytes, including neutrophils, basophils, and nizing and engulfing foreign material. Phagocytosis, eosinophils; the ingestion of solid particles such as microorganisms, • phagocytic cells, including monocytes, macrophages, induces gene transcription in the phagocytes, resulting in and dendritic cells; and the synthesis and secretion of mediators of the inflamma- • a subset of lymphocytes with natural cytotoxicity tory response such as cytokines and chemokines. Inflam- potential. mation recruits other cells into the local environment to play a role in eliminating the pathogen. These cells, classified as leukocytes, are found in the Innate host defense mechanisms depend on the pres- peripheral blood and distributed throughout the organs ence of certain anatomical structures and cells, effector of the body. The initial morphological descriptions of mechanisms, and recognition structures. In the follow- leukocytes appeared in the 1840s when Gabriel Andral ing sections the history of each of these components is in France and William Addison in England reported reviewed. It is noted when the historical background of the presence of white cells in peripheral blood (Hajdu, a particular subject is covered in subsequent chapters of 2003). These observations were followed by reports of this book. increased numbers of peripheral blood leukocytes that could be correlated with various diseases, including tuberculosis and sexually transmitted infections. In 1845 Anatomy Rudolph Virchow (1821–1902) in Germany and John The main anatomical components of the innate host Hughes Bennett (1812–1875) in Scotland simultaneously defense mechanisms include the skin and the mucous described the peripheral blood cells of patients with leu- membranes lining the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and kemia (Chapter 35). genitourinary tracts. These structures provide a barrier The functions of the cells of the innate host defense to invasion of the body by pathogens. The protective role system became the focus of studies for the remainder of INNATE DEfENsE MECHANIsMs 3 the nineteenth century. Two cell types, macrophages and with coryza (the common cold), he tried to isolate and granulocytes, are primarily involved in the removal of culture a causative agent from the individual’s nasal invading pathogens by the innate defense mechanisms. secretions. He was unsuccessful until day 4 when he In 1879, Paul Ehrlich (1854–1915) initially described noted growth of small colonies of large, gram-positive granulocytes based on staining characteristics using diplococcus that he termed Micrococcus lysodeikticus. dyes he developed in his laboratory. Ilya Metchnikov This bacterium is now classified as Micrococcus luteus (also Elie Metchnikoff) (1845–1916) provided descrip- and is recognized as part of the normal flora. Applica- tions of macrophages and developed his “phagocytic tion of a saline extract of nasal mucosa to cultures of theory of immunity” in 1884 (Chapter 15). M. luteus produced lysis of the bacteria. Lysozyme, as In addition to macrophages and granulocytes, a third this extract is called, is present in many bodily fluids and cell type, the NK (natural killer) lymphocyte, is consid- tissues. Lysozyme is now known to provide protection ered a component of the innate host defenses. NK cells against several gram-positive bacteria, especially on the are a heterogenous population of lymphocytes charac- conjunctiva of the eye and along mucous membranes. terized by their ability to lyse various cellular targets, Fleming received his early schooling in Scotland. In particularly malignant cells and cells infected with a 1906 he was awarded the MBBS (MD) degree from St variety of intracellular pathogens. They were discovered Mary’s Hospital Medical School in London. He served in the early 1970s based on the destruction of tumor cells. as an assistant to Sir Almroth Wright (discoverer of com- Morphologically, many of these cells are large granular plement—Chapter 12) at St Mary’s and as an instructor lymphocytes. NK lymphocytes exist in mice, humans, in the medical school. Following service in World War and other vertebrates. The experiments that character- I (1914–1918) Fleming returned to London to assume a ized these cells are presented in Chapter 28. professorship at the University of London. Fleming is best known for his discovery of penicillin Antimicrobial Molecules in 1929 when a fungus contaminated a culture of Staph- In 1894, A.A. Kanthak and W.B. Hardy, working at ylococcus while he was away from his laboratory. He Bartholomew Hospital in London and at Cambridge, returned from his summer holiday to find that the fun- injected rats and guinea pigs intraperitoneally with gus had secreted a substance that inhibited the growth Bacillus anthracis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Vibrio chol- of Staphylococcus as well as other gram-positive bacteria. erae. At intervals they killed the animals, removed cells Fleming was unsuccessful in purifying this inhibitory from their peritoneal cavities, and examined with a substance; however, Howard Florey (1898–1968) and microscope. Kanthak and Hardy observed that granulo- Ernst Boris Chain (1906–1979) succeeded and developed cytes surrounded the bacteria and extruded their gran- the fungal metabolite into the important antimicrobial ules upon contact while macrophages phagocytized drug, penicillin. Fleming, Florey, and Chain shared the the microbes. Those bacteria that were contacted by the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1945 “for the granulocytes were destroyed. One conclusion from this discovery of penicillin and its curative effect in various study was that the released granules must contain anti- infectious diseases.” microbial substances. Numerous investigators attempted to characterize this Effector Mechanisms antimicrobial material but were unsuccessful for more than 70 years. In 1966, H.I. Zeya and John Spitznagel In immunological terms, effector mechanisms refer at the University of North Carolina (1966a,b) isolated to the cells and/or molecules that are activated through the contents of the granules using electrophoresis. They interaction with a pathogen and subsequently inhibit the demonstrated that the antibacterial activity was found pathogen from causing disease. The innate host defenses in at least three separate molecules. In 1984, Mark employ four effector mechanisms: Selsted and colleagues at the University of California, Los Angeles purified the active material from rabbit • inflammation, granulocytes and demonstrated that it consisted of a • phagocytosis, group of molecules they termed defensins. Defensins are • complement activation, and low molecular weight peptides that have antimicrobial • cell-mediated cytotoxicity. activity. They are produced and stored in granulocytes Inflammation of the peripheral blood and the Paneth cells of the intes- tine. Defensins are also found on the skin and along the More than 2400 years ago, Hippocrates developed a mucous membranes of the respiratory, genitourinary, theory of the four cardinal humors to explain disease. and gastrointestinal tracts. These four humors, blood, phlegm, choler (yellow bile), In 1922, Alexander Fleming (1881–1955) described and melancholy (black bile), needed to be in balance lysozyme (muramidase). While studying an individual for a person to be healthy. Many disease treatments

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.