ebook img

3D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in northcentral Anatolia revealed by local PDF

31 Pages·2012·3.26 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview 3D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in northcentral Anatolia revealed by local

Geophysical Journal International Geophys.J.Int. (2012)188,819–849 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05313.x 3-D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in north-central Anatolia revealed by local earthquake tomography Seda Yolsal-C¸evikbilen,1 C. Berk Biryol,2 Susan Beck,2 George Zandt,2 Tuncay Taymaz,1 Hande E. Adıyaman2 and A. Arda O¨zacar3 s c ni 1DepartmentofGeophysicalEngineering,theFacultyofMines,IstanbulTechnicalUniversity,MaslakTR-34469,Istanbul,Turkey. o E-mail:[email protected] ct 2DepartmentofGeosciences,UniversityofArizona,Tucson,AZ85721,USA te 3DepartmentofGeologicalEngineering,MiddleEastTechnicalUniversity,I˙no¨nu¨Bulvarı,06531Ankara,Turkey d n aD o sw cn Accepted2011November21.Received2011November21;inoriginalform2010September13 milo a ad ne SUMMARY odyd from 3-D P-wave velocity structure and V /V variations in the crust along the North Anatolian Ge h p s ttp FanaudltSZ-woanvee(NtraAvFeZlti)minesn,otrothg-acienntarableAttneratuonlidaewrsetarendininvgesotifgathteedsbeyismthoeloingvicearlsicohnaorafcltoecriasltiPcs- GJIs://a c a of the region. The 3-D local earthquake tomography inversions included 5444 P- and 3200 d e m S-wavereadingsobtainedfrom168well-locatedearthquakesbetween2006Januaryand2008 ic May.Denseraycoverageyieldsgoodresolution,particularlyinthecentralpartofthestudy .o u p area. The 3-D Vp and Vp/Vs tomographic images reveal clear correlations with both the .c o surfacegeologyandsignificanttectonicunitsintheregion.Weobservedthelowerlimitofthe m /g seismogeniczonefornorth-centralAnatoliaat15kmdepth.Finalearthquakelocationsdisplay ji/a adistributedpatternthroughoutthestudyarea,withmostoftheearthquakesoccurringonthe rtic majorsplaysoftheNAFZ,ratherthanitsmasterstrand.Weidentifythreemajorhigh-velocity le -a blocks in the mid-crust separated by the ˙Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan Suture and interpret these b s blockstobecontinentalbasementfragmentsthatwereaccretedontothemarginfollowingthe tra c closureofNeo-TethyanOcean.Thesebasementblocksmayhaveinpartinfluencedtherupture t/1 8 propagationsofthehistorical1939,1942and1943earthquakes.Inaddition,largevariations 8 /3 inthe V /V ratiointhe mid-crustwere observed and have been correlated withthe varying /8 p s 1 fluidcontentsoftheexistinglithologiesandrelatedtectonicstructures. 9/6 9 0 Key words: Seismicity and tectonics; Body waves; Seismic tomography; Continental tec- 2 1 6 tonics:strike-slipandtransform;Crustalstructure. b y g u e s t o n 0 5 b; Figs 1b and c). The Intra-Pontide and ˙Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan A 1 INTRODUCTION p Inthisstudyweinvestigatethe3-DcrustalstructurealongtheNorth Stiudteusr,eKZıros¸neehsir(MIAaEsSsiZf,)E,˙IzsitnaenbPuazlaZroı–nSeu,nSgaukralruyFaaZuoltnaen,dCtehnetrC¸alanPkoınr-ı ril 20 1 AnatolianFaultZone(NAFZ)innorthern-centralAnatolia.Itisa Basinareexamplesofthesetectonicstructures(Fig.1b).The2000- 9 seismicallyactivedextralstrike-slipfaultzoneextendingforabout km-long˙Izmir-Ankara-ErzincanSutureZone(Fig.2b),aremnant 1500kmfromKarlıovaineasternTurkeytotheGulfofSarosinthe oftheNeo-TethysOceanandamajorcompressionalpalaeotectonic AegeanSea(Fig.1a).ActivetectonicsoftheNorthCentralAnato- structureinnorthernTurkey,trendsinanapproximatelyE–Wdi- lianregionaregovernedbythecomplexcollisionoftheArabian, rectiontothewestofAnkara,thenturnsnearly90◦andhasaNNE Africanand Eurasianplates and theresultingwestward extrusion trend towards C¸ankırı (see Koc¸yig˘it 1991; Okay & Tu¨ysu¨z 1999; of Anatolian Plate between the right-lateral NAFZ and the left- Kaymakc¸ı2000;Taymazetal.2007a,b).TheC¸ankırıBasinislo- lateralEastAnatolianFaultZone(EAFZ,McKenzie1972;S¸engo¨r catedbetweentheSakaryaContinenttothenorthandtheKırs¸ehir 1979;S¸engo¨retal.1985;Deweyetal.1986;Taymaz1996;Taymaz BlocktothesouthandboundedbytheNorthAnatolianOphiolitic etal.2004,2007a).Ascommonlyemphasized,theNAFZandsur- Me´lange in the west, north and east (Fig. 1c). It has a basement roundingregionareimportantcontributorstotheseismotectonics consisting of an upper Cretaceous ophiolitic me´lange and grani- oftheAnatolianregion,becausetheyappeartorepresentageologi- toidsoftheKırs¸ehirBlock(Kaymakc¸ıetal.2009,2010;Robertson calknotwheremanydifferenttectonicbeltsconverge(Ketin1966; etal.2009).Duetoitsmultideformationalgeologicalhistory,the Go¨ru¨r et al. 1998; Okay & Tu¨ysu¨z 1999; Taymaz et al. 2007a, C¸ankırıBasinandsurroundingregionhavebeenthefocusofseveral (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors 819 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS 820 S.Yolsal-C¸evikbilenetal. D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic Figure1. (a)MajortectonicunitsandbathymetryintheEasternMediterraneanSearegion(seefordetailsTaymazetal.2004,2007a,b;Yolsaletal.2007; le Yolsal2008andYolsal&Taymaz2010).NAFZ,NorthAnatolianFaultZone;NEAF,NorthEastAnatolianFault;EAFZ,EastAnatolianFaultZone;DSF,Dead -a b TSeraanTsfroarnmsfoFramultF;aDulFt,;DAeSli,leArpFs¸aeuroltn;EScilFl,;EBcFe,mBios¸zFoavualtF;aEuFl,t;EBlbGisFt,aBneFyas¸uelht;irEGSFo¨Zlu¨,FEazuinlte;PBaMzaGrı,–BSuu¨ynug¨kurMlueFnaduelrteZsoGnera;bEernF;,BErucFi,yBesuFrdauurlt;FGau,lGt;o¨CkToFv,a;CGepeh,aGloedniiza strac Graben;GF,GarniFault;IF,Ig˘dırFault;K,Karlıova;KBF,Kavakbas¸ıFault;KF,Kag˘ızmanFault;KFZ,Karatas¸-OsmaniyeFaultZone;MF,MalatyaFault; t/1 8 MRF,MainRecentFault;MT,Mus¸Thrust;OF,OvacıkFault;PSF,Pampak-SavanFault;PTF,PaphosTransformFault;SaF,SalmasFault;Si,SimavGraben; 8 /3 SuF,Sultandag˘Fault;TeF,TebrizFault;TF,TatarlıFault;TGF,TuzGo¨lu¨Fault;TuF,TutakFault.Largeblackarrowsshowrelativeplatemotionswithrespect /8 toEurasia(McCluskyetal.2000,2003).Bathymetriccontoursareshownat500,1000,1500and2000m,andareobtainedfromGEBCO-BODC(1997)and 19 Smith&Sandwell(1997a,b).(b)MajortectonicunitsandblocksinTurkey.AFZ,AlmusFaultZone;CAFZ,CentralAnatolianFaultZone;DFZ,DodurgaFault /69 Zone;ETGFZ,Eskis¸ehir-TuzGo¨lu¨FaultZone;EFZ,EldivanFaultZone;LFZ,Lac¸inFaultZone;ESFZ,EzinePazarı–SungurluFaultZone;KFZ,Kızılırmak 02 1 FaultZone;ODFZ,Orta–DevrezFaultZone;C¸KFZ,C¸erkes¸–Kurs¸unluFaultZone(revisedfromBozkurt&Koc¸yig˘it1996;Koc¸yig˘it&Beyhan1998;Okay& 6 Tu¨ysu¨z1999;Kaymakc¸ı2000;Koc¸yig˘itetal.2001;Kaymakc¸ıetal.2003;Taymazetal.2007b).(c)GeneralizedgeologicalmapoftheNorthAnatolianFault by Zone(NAFZ)innorth-centralAnatoliashowingtheC¸ankırıBasin(Okay&Tu¨ysu¨z1999;Taymazetal.2007b). gu e s t o n geological,seismologicalandgeophysicalstudies(e.g.Go¨ru¨retal. 2009) compared to the SAF, which has ∼315–730 km of offset 0 5 1984; S¸engo¨r et al. 1985; Piper et al. 1996; Ates¸ et al. 1999; (e.g.McKenzie&Morgan1969;Atwater1970;Dickinson&Wer- A p 2K0a1y0m;aTkac¸yım20a0z0e;tAadl.ıy2a0m0a7na,ebt;aSl.e2y0it0o1g˘;luKaeytmala.k2c¸0ı0et9a).l.I2n0n0o3r,t2h0e0rn9-, nthicekNeA1F99c7o)n.stSitiumteilsarthiennloarrtgheerenarbtohuqnudaakreyaocftitvhietyAwnaittholitahnePSlaAteF., ril 20 1 centralAnatolia,thisstudyarea,therearealsoseveralsmall-and The scattered earthquake activity along the NAF and the abun- 9 large-scalesedimentarybasins(e.g.C¸erkes¸-Kurs¸unlu-Ilgaz,Tosya, danceofoff-faultseismicitymightbeanindicationofitsyoungage Kargı, Vezirko¨pru¨, Havza–Ladik, Niksar, Sus¸ehri, Erzincan and and geological and structural complexity. Fig. 2(a) shows recent Karlıova)associatedwithbendsandoffsetsofthestrike-slipfault seismicity in the Eastern Mediterranean and surrounding region zones. reported by the USGS-NEIC (United States Geological Survey – TheNorthAnatolianFault(NAF)isanalogoustotheSanAndreas National Earthquake Information Center; 1973–2010) and focal Fault(SAF)inCaliforniainsomeways,withthetwocontinental mechanism solutions of major earthquakes (M > 6.0) along the transformssharingsimilarsliprates,totalfaultlengthandstraight- NAFZ. Major destructive earthquakes occur on the NAFZ with ness relative to their poles of rotation (Stein et al. 1997). How- a westward migrating pattern, from the Karlıova Triple Junction ever, the age and offset values are significantly different for each to the Marmara region, in series, every ∼200–400 yr, causing faultzone.TheNAFisyounger(∼5Ma)thantheSAF(∼17–30 serious risk for population centres (for details see Barka 1996; Ma)andhasabout85kmofcumulativedisplacement(Westaway Stein et al. 1997; Ambraseys 2002). One of the largest histor- 1994;Armijoetal.1999;Barkaetal.2000;Hubert-Ferrarietal. ical earthquakes occurred in 1939, in Erzincan, eastern Turkey (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS Structurerevealedbyearthquaketomography 821 D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 1 6 b y g u e s t o n 0 5 A p ril 2 0 1 9 Figure1. (Continued.) (Mw 7.9) and ruptured over 360 km of the NAFZ, with a maxi- and 7.2 ˙Izmit and Du¨zce earthquakes, respectively (Barka et al. mumright-lateraloffsetof∼7.5m.Theseismicity(Fig.2a)pro- 2000). gressedalongthefaultzonewithmanyMs>6earthquakes,reach- In this study we used local earthquake tomography (LET) to ing Hersek Peninsula and beyond with the recent 1999, Mw 7.6 obtainabetterunderstandingofthe3-DP-wavecrustalstructure (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS 822 S.Yolsal-C¸evikbilenetal. D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 1 6 b y g u e s t o n 0 5 A p ril 2 0 1 9 Figure1. (Continued.) and V /V ratios for the region. LET studies are able to image 1997, 2009; Husen et al. 2000; Paul et al. 2001; Rowlands et al. p s heterogeneitiesinthecrustanduppermantle,withspatialresolution 2005;Koulakovetal.,2007;Kaypak2008;Haberlandetal.2009). dependingonthedensityofraysampling(e.g.Thurber1981,1992). A detailed knowledge of the velocity structure of the crust and Manylocaltomographystudieshavebeenperformedduringthelast upper mantle not only helps to improve our understanding of the decadeindifferenttectonicallyactiveregions,includingstrike-slip, tectonicsofaregion,butalsoplaysakeyroleinobtainingaccurate subduction, collisional and/or volcanic zones (see Thurber et al. earthquakelocations. (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS Structurerevealedbyearthquaketomography 823 D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 Figure2. (a)EarthquakeactivityreportedbyUSGS-NEICandfocalmechanismsolutionsofmajorearthquakes(M>6.0)alongtheNorthAnatolianFault 16 Zone(NAFZ)andsurroundingregionfortheperiodof1973–2010(TableB1;compiledfromMcKenzie1972;Taymazetal.1991,2007b;Taymaz1999; by S¸engo¨retal.2005)and(b)thesettingoftheNAFPassiveSeismicExperimentinthenorth-centralAnatolia.Theseismicnetwork(whitesquares)consisted gu ofNAFbroad-bandstationsoperatingfrom2006Januaryto2008May.TheblacksquaresdenoteKOERI(KandilliObservatory)stationsusedtoimprovethe es azimuthalcoverageinthisstudy(seeTable1).Newearthquake(M≥3.0)locationsobtainedbyusingtheANTELOPEdbloc2commercialsoftwaresuitefrom t o n BRTT(1998)andPandSreadingsrecordedbyNAFandKOERIstationsarealsoshown.Blacklinesindicatethemajorfaults(S¸arog˘luetal.1992)andred 0 thesuturezones(Okay&Tu¨ysu¨z1999)intheregion,respectively.IAESZ,˙Izmir-Ankara-ErzincanSutureZone;ESFZ,EzinePazarı–SungurluFault;NAFZ, 5 A NorthAnatolianFaultZone;ITS,Intra-TaurideSuture;IPS,Intra-PontideSuture. pril 2 0 1 9 Despitenumerousgeologicalandgeophysicalstudies,theshal- S¸engo¨retal.2005;Taymazetal.2007a,b;Toketal.2008;Gans lowcomplexstructuresinnorth-centralAnatoliaremainpoorlyun- et al. 2009; Biryol et al. 2010). To image the crustal structure in derstood.Afterthedevastating1999˙IzmitandDu¨zceearthquakes, north-central Anatolia, Gu¨rbu¨z et al. (2003) carried out seismic theMarmaraSeaBasinandthewesternpartoftheNAFZwerein- refractionstudies,whichsuggestedthecrustisabout36kmthick vestigatedinnumerousseismologicalstudies.Severaltomography at south of NAFZ, and decreases to 30 km north of the NAFZ, studieswereperformedtounderstandtheshallowcrustalstructure withanaverageP velocityof7.8kms–1.Similarly,Kulelietal. n of the western continuation of the NAFZ (e.g. Nakamura et al. (2004) found that the crustal thickness varies between 37 and 42 2002;Karabulutetal.2003;Barıs¸ etal.2005;Salahetal.2007; kmincentralAnatolia,withaP velocityofabout8kms–1,also n Beceletal.2010;Koulakovetal.2010).Incontrast,thereisstill basedonseismicrefractiondata.Theyobservedlaterallychanging nodetailedinformationaboutthe3-Dcrustalvelocitystructureand crustalthicknessandanabruptchangeacrossthemajorfaultzones, deformationstylesinthecentralpartoftheNAFZ,eventhoughit suchastheNAFZ,suggestingthatthecrustalthicknessisthinner hasbeenextensivelystudiedbyvariousmethods(e.g.Tataretal. innorthwestAnatoliaandslightlythickerineasternAnatolia.Gans 1996;Gu¨rbu¨zetal.2003;Tokso¨zetal.2003;Kulelietal.2004; et al. (2009) performed P tomography and reported the lack of n (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS 824 S.Yolsal-C¸evikbilenetal. a P velocity contrast across the NAFZ. They also found that P n n velocitiesintheEasternandWesternPontidesareslowerthaninthe CentralPontides.Inaddition,thereareanumberofcrustalmodels fromreceiverfunctionstudiesbySaundersetal.(1998),Toketal. (2008) and C¸akır & Erduran (2011) for the Anatolian region to nameafewamongothers. We investigate the shallow crustal structure and seismicity in thecentralpartoftheNorthAnatolianFaultusingLET.Weused high-qualityearthquakedatarecordedby47broad-bandseismome- terstodeterminea3-DP-wavevelocitymodelandtheV /V dis- p s tribution. We compare our tomographic images with well-known geologicalstructuressuchastheEzinePazarı–SungurluFaultZone, C¸ankırıBasinand˙Izmir-Ankara-ErzincanSutureZone. D o 2 DATA AND METHOD w n lo Weused39broad-bandseismicstationsinstalledinthestudyarea a d starting in 2006 January and operating until 2008 May, as a part Figure 3. Wadati diagram using P- andS -wave traveltimes recorded by ed ofthe‘NorthAnatolianFault(NAF)passiveseismicexperiment’, theNAFExperimentandKOERIstationsusedinthisstudy.Tp,P-wave fro anicjoailnUt pnriovejercsittyb,etMwiedednlethEeaUstnTiveecrhsnitiycaolfUAnriivzeornsait,yIsatnadnbBuolg˘Taezcihc¸-i tthraevnelotrimthe-c;eTnst,raSl-Awnaavteoltiraavreelgtiiomne..TheapproximateVp/Vsratiois1.76for m http s University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Insti- ://a tute (KOERI; http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/, last accessed 2010). c a d Wealsocomplementedourstationswithadditionaldatafromeight e m permanentbroad-bandKOERInetworkstationslocatedinthesame ic region(Table1,Fig.2b). .o u p ThedatasetincludesarrivaltimesofP-wavesandS–Ptimesob- .c tainedfrom∼300localearthquakes(M≥3.0)thatoccurredwithin om north-centralAnatoliafortheperiodof2006January–2008May. /g Aanrdrihvoalritziomnetsalocfo9m8p9o0nPenatnsdus7in9g17thSeAwaNvTesELwOerPeEpcicokmedmoerncivaelrstiocfat-l ji/article waresuitefromBoulderReal-TimeTechnologies(BRTT1998).The -a b Wadatidiagramandtraveltimeversusdistancegraphswereplotted stra c t/1 Table1. Coordinatesofbroad-bandseismicstationswhichbelongto 88 the‘NAFPassiveSeismicExperiment’andKOERIusedinthisstudy /3 (seeFig.2b). Figure 4. Traveltime Vs. distance plot indicating average direct and re- /81 Station Lat.(◦N) Lon.(◦E) Station Lat.(◦N) Lon.(◦E) fractedcrustalP-andS-wavevelocities. 9/69 0 2 ALIC 40.978 33.487 INSU 39.842 35.366 1 6 ALIN 41.061 32.879 ISKE 40.764 37.067 toestimatetheaverageV /V ratio(1.76),aswellasthedirectand b p s y ALOR 41.301 32.870 KARA 40.688 35.245 refractedcrustalP-andS-wavevelocities(Figs3and4).Wewere gu ARSL 40.955 35.887 KARG 40.291 33.552 e abletolocateabout200earthquakes,whichhadatleastsixPand s BBBAEEDKGIIB 444011...213721815 333634...452106063 KKKAGIYVAIAC 444000...219834011 333254...833712836 SLOrePaEdidnbglso,cw2iathlgaonriathzmimpuathckalaggeapanodftlheessvtehlaonci2ty00m◦o,dueslinogfAGuN¨rTbuE¨z- t on 05 etal.(2003)andTokso¨zetal.(2003).Inthefinalinversions,only A BOKE 40.552 36.211 KIZI 40.048 36.536 p BCZAKKM 4410..906105 3347..030637 KKUUYZAL 4410..549401 3346..323428 1ti6o8necaorvtehrqaugaek(e≤s1w8e0r◦e),sethleecnteudmbbaesreodfoPn-tahnedirSa-zwimavuethraeladgianpgisn(>staa-t ril 201 CALT 41.328 35.125 KUZO 40.904 32.861 least10P-wavearrivals)andsmallrmsvalues(Fig.2b). 9 CANT 40.606 33.619 KVT 41.008 36.046 CAYA 40.373 34.269 LOD 39.889 32.764 CORM 40.178 34.630 OGUR 41.109 35.165 2.1 1-Dvelocityinversion CRLU 40.064 34.357 PANC 40.647 34.301 CUKU 40.604 33.441 PELI 41.113 34.299 Toobtainanappropriate1-Dstartingmodel,wecomputedthebest DERE 41.477 35.064 RSDY 40.397 37.327 minimum 1-D P-wave velocity model using the VELEST code DIKM 41.649 35.025 SEYH 40.856 32.900 (Kissling1988;Kisslingetal.1994,1995).Thisalgorithmcalcu- DOGL 40.391 35.284 SVSK 39.917 36.992 latestheraypathsfromsourcetoreceiver,includingdirect,refracted DUMA 40.918 35.140 SYUN 40.838 33.529 andreflectedrayspassingthroughthegiven1-Dvelocitymodel.Be- EKIN 41.147 35.787 TEPE 41.369 35.743 causetheproblemisnon-linear,thesolutionisobtainediteratively. GOCE 39.743 34.348 YESI 40.405 37.229 The inversion process consists of checking the space parameters, HASA 41.469 33.565 YIKI 40.748 35.954 takingintoaccountdifferent1-Dinitialmodelsthatincludevarying INCE 40.581 32.906 the numbers of initial velocities and thicknesses of the layers. It (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS Structurerevealedbyearthquaketomography 825 Table2. Thefinal1-DP-wavevelocitymodel Next,wedeterminednewearthquakehypocentresusingthebest obtainedforthestudyarea. minimum1-DP-wavevelocitymodel,P-wavestationcorrections andtraveltimesoflocalPandSwavesinthesingleeventmodeof Layerdepth Layerthickness (km) (km) Vp(kms–1) theVELESTalgorithm.Wealsoplottedapproximateraycoverage usinglinestoconnectindividualstationsandevents(Fig.7).These –2.0 –2.0 2.15 rays demonstrate the capability of resolving power for each grid 0.0 5.0 3.86 5.0 2.0 5.66 nodeinthe3-DLETinversion. 7.0 2.0 5.99 9.0 2.0 6.09 11.0 4.0 6.10 2.2 3-DLET 15.0 5.0 6.18 20.0 10.0 6.20 We used the damped least-squares iterative inverse code 30.0 10.0 6.62 SIMULPS14, which includes a standard approximate pseudo- 40.0∗ 10.0 7.67 bending ray tracer (ART) and a full 3-D shooting ray tracer al- 50.0∗ – 8.10 gorithm(RKP,Eberhart-Phillips1990,1993;Virieux&Farra1991; D ∗Denotesanundeterminedlayervelocityby Evansetal.1994;Husenetal.2000;Haslinger&Kissling2001), ow n the1-Dinversion. toinvertforthe3-Dvelocitymodels.Thefinaldatasetconsistsof lo a 168 well-located earthquakes recorded by 47 broad-band seismic d e alsocalculatesstationcorrectionstocompensateforheterogeneous slotactiitoynms,owdiethl i5s4s4p4ePci-fiweadveonanads3e2t0o0fS3--wDavsepaatriraivlaglrtiidmpeosin.tTsh,ewviteh- d from v1e9l8o8c;itSyeasrtrcuyc2tu0r0e3)n.eFaurritnhderivdideutaaillssotaftitohnespr(oDcoeussgilnagss1t9ep6s7;foPrutjhoel athleinperaerviionutesrpLoElaTtiostnudaideospcteitdedbeetawrleieenr.tWheepcooinnststr,uccotendsisthteentinwitiitahl https VELESTcodecanbefoundinKissling(1988)andKisslingetal. P-wave velocity model using the best minimum 1-D horizontally ://a c (1994,1995). layeredmodeldeterminedfromtheVELESTcode,andareference ad WeappliedtheVELESTcodeinasimultaneousmode,inverting Vp/Vsvalueof1.75.Weinitiallytriedseveraldifferentgridintervals, em fsotarrbtiontgh1ve-Dlocvietyloacnitdyhmypoodceelnitnrealcoccoartdioanncs.eWweitchhoresferalacytieorninsgeoisfmthice vfoarrythineginbveetrwseioenn.1A5fiannadl3g0rikdmsp,atocionbgtaoifn2t5hekmop×tim2u5mkmgriindtsheettihnogrs- ic.oup studiescarriedoutinthisregion(Gu¨rbu¨zetal.2003;Tokso¨zetal. izontaldirectionswaschosenforthecentralpartofthestudyarea, .co duetothedenseraypathcoverageandstationdistribution(Fig.7). m 2003). Because the VELEST code does not alter layer geometry /g andinvolvesatrial-and-errorprocess,weperformedtrialrunsfor Gridnodesintheverticaldirectionwerepositionedat–2,0,5,7,9, ji/a several models with different layering and velocities to select the 11,15,20,30,40and50km,consistentwithourbest1-DP-wave rtic bbeesstt-mfititninimgulamye1r-Dthimckondeesls.Tahnedvgeeloomcietytrmy,oadnedlgthivuisntgothesetmabilnisimhuthme v5ealoncdity11mkomdelyi(eTladbeldel2o)w.Trhmesthvianluveesrtficoarltnhoedieniltaiyaelr1in-Dgbsetatwrteinegn le-ab s rmsvalue(0.51)waschosenasthefinal1-DP-wavevelocitymodel modelandinitialearthquakelocations.Thethinlayersallowbet- tra (Fig.5andTable2).Thelayersat40and50kmdeptharepoorly termodellingofverticalgradientswhichimprovesraytracingfor ct/1 raysbottominginthisdepthrangeandprovidemodelflexibilityto 8 constrained due to the absence of deep earthquakes in the study 8 moreaccuratelyreflecttopographyofthebasin–basementinterface. /3 area.Theinversionresultsweretestedbyusingmanyinitialmodels /8 Modelresolutionstudiesshownlaterindicatethatthereissomede- 1 withaveragevelocitiessignificantlyhigherandlowerthanthoseof 9 the starting 1-D model. However, we calculated high rms values cline in individual parameter resolution but we did not interpret /69 for both trial cases. We used damping parameters of 0.01 for the individual node anomalies in the resulting tomography. Another 02 1 hypocentral,0.1forthestationand1.0forthevelocityparameters, important input parameter is the minimum number of rays sam- 6 b assuggestedbyKissling(1988)andKisslingetal.(1994). pling in each grid node; the resolution of the inversion improves y g TocalculateP-wavestationcorrections,weselectedstationPELI as the number of rays increases. Using a trial-and-error method, ue asthereferencestationbecauseofitscentrallocationwithinthenet- we chose a minimum of five rays for both the synthetic and the st o workandtheabundanceofrecordedearthquakes(Fig.2b).Station realmodels.Basedonpreviousstudies,thecrustalthicknesswas n 0 corrections represent the averaged characteristics of local surface assumed to be about 40 km for the entire model and to account 5 A goueorlcoagsye,astmeaalclhstasittieon(Kdeislasylisnwge1r9e8o8b;taHinuesdeninetthaelc.e2n0t0ra0l,p2a0r0to3f).thIne fcoornsatrrraivinaelsdobfyPandpeheapseers,ltahyeeruplopceart-emdanattle50pakrmto.fTthhreoumgohdoeultwthaes pril 2 0 seismicnetwork,whereaslargeP-wavestationcorrections(>0.7s) tomography inversion, we applied weighting to each observation 19 basedonbothresidualsizeandsource–receiverdistance.Wealso were found towards the outer regions of our study area (Fig. 6). testedvariabilitywithlargerandequallayergridnodespacingand Negativestationdelayscorrespondtohavingtruevelocitiesfaster obtainedverysimilarresultsforthewell-resolvedcentralportion than the model, and positive delays to true velocities slower than ofourmodelledregion(seeAppendicesAandB). the model. Absolute station delay values tend to be larger at the Oneofthekeyparametersintheinversionisthedampingvalue, outsideofthenetworkduetothecombinedeffectsoflocalgeology whichdependsontheearthquakesource-stationdistributionandthe and the limited azimuthal coverage and distances of observations selectedgridintervals.Thedampingparameterinfluencesboththe at these stations. Thus the resultant 1-D velocity model is a bet- inversionresultsandresolutionestimates(e.g.Husenetal.2000; terrepresentationofthestructureinthewell-sampledcentralparts Kisslingetal.2001).Inthisstudy,wefollowedtheEberhart-Phillips anddeviatesmorefromthestructureintheperipheralregionsand (1986)proceduretoselecttheappropriatedampingvaluebyeval- structurebeneathcorrespondingstations.Thisdeviationmightbe uatingtrade-offcurvesbetweenthedataandthesolution(model) mappingintostationcorrections(andcompensatedbytheseterms) variances. These trade-off curves are built with a single iteration oftheperipheralstations,makingthemlarger. (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS 826 S.Yolsal-C¸evikbilenetal. D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 1 6 b y g u e s t o Figure5 (a)Thefinal1-DP-wavevelocitymodel(blacksolidline)afterseveralinversionsteps(formodeldetailsseeTable2).Thedashedlineshowsthe n starting(initial)1-Dvelocitymodelusedintheinversion.(b)Testsonthestabilityoftheminimum1-DP-wavevelocitymodel.Thedashedlinesindicatethe 05 inputmodelsforthetestswithhighandwithlowinitialvelocities,andthesolidlinesrepresenttheresultingmodelsaftertheinversion. A p ril 2 0 1 inversion for the coupled hypocentre-model parameters, using a node(KHIT),thederivativeweightedsum(DWS,geometricaver- 9 widerangeofdampingparameters.Becausesuitabledampingval- age)andthediagonalelementoftheresolutionmatrix,resolution ues show a significant decrease in data variance without a strong diagonalelement(RDE,seeHaslingeretal.1999;Husenetal.2000; increaseinmodelvariance,wechoseadampingvalueof50forboth Diasetal.2007;Kaypak2008;Arroyoetal.2009;Thurberetal. V andV /V inversionsbasedonthecalculatedtrade-offcurvesand 2009).Forexample,theDWSvaluedefinestherelativeraydensity p p s Occam’sRazorapproach(Fig.8).Adampingparameterof10also inthevicinityofamodelparameter(Thurber&Eberhart-Phillips producesthesamedatavariance,butitscalculatedmodelvariance 1999)andisabettermeasureofinformationdensityprovidedby ishigher.AccordingtotheOccam’sRazorapproach,iftwomodels theraycoveragethancountingthenumberofrays.TheRDEisthe givethesamemisfit,thetendencyistochoosethesimplestmodel bestandquickestestimationofthequalityofthesolution,however, (e.g. smallest number of parameter, smallest size and smoothest; asitpresentsthedegreeofindependenceofthemodelparameters seeTrampert&Spetzler2006). inthesolution.Allresolutionparametersareaffectedbythechosen Additionalcriteriondescribetheresolutionofthetomographyre- model parametrization of the tomography inversion (Husen et al. sults,includingthenumberofrayhitscontributingtooneparticular 2000,2004;Kisslingetal.2001). (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS Structurerevealedbyearthquaketomography 827 D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s Figure6. P-wavestationcorrectionsobtainedfromthebest1-DP-wavevelocitymodelinversion(relativetostationPELI). ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 1 6 b y g u e s t o n 0 5 A Figure7. Hypocentrelocationsof168selectedearthquakesobtainedfromtheVELESTsingleeventlocationandraypathcoverage(thingreylines)for3-D p P-wavelocalearthquaketomography.Plussignsandwhitesquaresrepresent25km×25kmhorizontalgridnodespacing(forinteriorparts)andseismic ril 2 0 broad-bandstations,respectively. 1 9 3 RESOLUTION AND RESULTS 3.1 Resolution The3-DP-wavevelocityandV /V ratiomodelswereobtainedby Ascommonlyemphasized,complex3-Dvelocitystructuresderived p s performingtwoseparatebutsequentialinversionsteps,eachhav- fromLETcanonlybeinterpretedmeaningfullyifthemodel’squal- ingsixiterations,usingtheinversioncontrolparametersdescribed ityisknown(e.g.Thurber1993;Husenetal.2000;Arroyoetal. earlier.Theoutputofthefirstinversionwasintroducedastheinput 2009).Wethereforeplottedtheresolutioncontrolparameterssuch to the second inversion. After the final inversion, we reduced the asDWSandRDE(Fig.9).Further,weusedcheckerboardsensitiv- rmstraveltimeresidualfrom0.51s(rmsfor1-DP-wavevelocity itytests,whichareusefulinassessingtheabilityofthetomographic inversion)to0.077s(rmsafter3-DP-waveinversion)and0.078s inversiontoresolvestructuraldetailsintheEarth,togiveageneral (rmsafter3-DV /V inversion). picture of the resolving power of the inversion. For this purpose, p s (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS 828 S.Yolsal-C¸evikbilenetal. D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m ic .o u p .c o m /g ji/a rtic le -a b s tra c t/1 8 8 /3 /8 1 9 /6 9 0 2 1 6 b y g u e s t o n 0 5 A p ril 2 Figure8. Trade-offcurvesplottedfordifferentdampingvaluesforP-waveandVp/Vsratioone-iterationinversions.Wechoseadampingvalueof50forboth 01 inversions. 9 we set up a checkerboard velocity model by adding ±5 per cent Wealsoappliedjackknifeteststoobservetheinfluenceofvarious velocityvariationtoourinitialmodel,andgeneratingsyntheticP- groupsofearthquakesontheinversionresults.Foreachcase,we wavetraveltimesfromeachearthquakehypocentretotherecording removed10differentearthquakesselectedrandomlyfromtheinput stations.Thevelocityperturbationsareapercentageoftheactual data, and then applied the 3-D inversion using the same model velocityvalue.Beforetheinversion,weaddedGaussiandistributed parametrization. The mean velocities and standard deviations of noise with a standard deviation of 0.1 s, with zero mean, to the velocitieswerecalculatedforeachgridpointineachmodellayer, synthetictraveltimes.Finally,thesyntheticdatawereinvertedusing usingthejackknifetestresults(seeAppendixA,FigsA1–A4).The thesameparametrization,constraintsandcontrolparametersused jackknifetestandresolutionparametersindicatethatwehavegood intherealdatainversion(Fig.10). resolutioninthecentralpartofourstudyarea. (cid:3)C 2012TheAuthors,GJI,188,819–849 GeophysicalJournalInternational(cid:3)C 2012RAS

Description:
north-central Anatolia revealed by local earthquake tomography 1Department of Geophysical Engineering, the Faculty of Mines, Istanbul Technical University, mechanical and petrological properties of the crust (Roecker 1982;.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.