ebook img

316 Adelaide Drive Landmark Assessment PDF

94 Pages·2011·8.82 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview 316 Adelaide Drive Landmark Assessment

316 Adelaide Drive Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report Evaluation Report Parcel Map Sanborn Maps Photographs Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by: PCR Services Corporation Santa Monica, California June 1, 2011 316 Adelaide Drive Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The subject property located at 316 Adelaide Drive was constructed circa 1919 in the Spanish Colonial Revival architectural style. The single-family residence is situated on the Adelaide Drive, between 7th Street to the east, Ocean Avenue to the west, Adelaide Drive to the north, and Ocean Avenue to the south. The Pacific Ocean is approximately one-quarter mile to the west. The two-story house is located in the Palisades Tract, Block M, Lots 8 and 9 and covers an area of approximately 100 feet by 237 feet. The subject residence has a U- shaped footprint and occupies lots 9 and one half of lot 8. There is a pool, guest house, and garage situated on the southeast portion of the lots. REGULATORY SETTING The subject property has been identified and assessed under the City of Santa Monica’s ongoing survey process. The property was first surveyed in March 1983 as a property that appears eligible for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places.1 At that time, it was given a National Register of Historic Places (National Register) status code rating of 3 (later changed to 3S in the Historic Resources Inventory Update – Earthquake Assessment, 1995). The Earthquake Assessment report noted “repairs have been made and the building has been repainted. Some of the barrel clay tile roof has been carefully replaced. Terra cotta detailing on the upper floor balcony wall has been repaired or replicated to match the original appearance.”2 The City’s Historic Resources Inventory also identified the property as a contributor to a potential City of Santa Monica historic district called the “Adelaide Drive/Adelaide Place Grouping.”3 In 2002, the “Historic Resources Inventory Update: North of Montana Survey Area” validated the findings of the previous surveys and was assigned a 3S/5D status code. The Santa Monica Citywide Historic resources Inventory Update Final Report assigned the property a 3S status code, “appears eligible for the National Register as an individual property through survey evaluation” and a 5B status code, “locally significant both individually (listed, eligible, or appears eligible) and as a contributor to a district that is locally listed, designated, determined eligible or appears eligible through survey evaluation.” ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION AND INTEGRITY The subject property is an altered example of what was originally a one-story U-shaped "Churrigueresque -style" Spanish Colonial Revival residence constructed with brick walls 1 Evelyn Hitchcock and L. Heumann, 316 Adelaide Drive, State of California Historic Resources Inventory, March 1983. 2 Historic Resources Inventory Update – Earthquake Assessment, 1995, p. 25. 3 Johnson Heumann, Adelaide Drive and Adelaide Place Grouping, State of California Historic Resources Inventory 1983, revised 1986. 316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 2 finished in stucco. The existing residence maintains the U-shape, however, the southwest wing was demolished and a new two-story wing was constructed. The primary street fronting section of the residence retains much of its integrity, both on the exterior and interior. The wall surfaces of the subject property are stucco with a light pink paint finish. Originally, the stucco surface was integrally colored with no paint surface. Each window on the primary façade has three casement windows divided by decorative wood mullions. On the interior, pocket screens pull down over the window openings. Decorative cast-iron awnings (alteration) above each window are surface-mounted to the stucco walls. The entranceway is topped by a large ornate cast stone Churrigueresque door surround slightly raised from the stucco exterior walls. The decorative theme of the surround includes egg-and-dart, floral patterns, and faux-scored cast stone. The recessed door is made of wood with a large glazed panel covered by painted cast-iron decorative square bars. The door sits over a low step and is topped with a fanlight. The side-gabled roof is topped with red-clay barrel tiles. The interior formal rooms and entrance foyer retain their integrity intact. However, the rear elevation is altered where original openings and a bay window were removed and new double doors and bay window were added. The northeast wing retains its original footprint and flat roof, and most of its original windows on the northeast façade; however, much of the interior and some of the openings have been altered. Windows on the northeast façade are recessed and topped with a thick wood lintel. Decorative cast bar security grills are surface mounted over each window opening. A recessed secondary entranceway sits above two low brick stairs and is topped with a decorative cast iron bar awning. The door is wood with recessed panels and a large glazed panel. The windows towards the rear of the northeast wing visually are modeled on the front façade windows which are divided by a decorative turned wood mullion. These windows appear non-original although the openings might have been part of the original design. Also, the doorway at the rear (south end) of the northeast wing appears non-original. As mentioned above, the entire southwest wing was demolished. Furthermore, the garage was altered and historically incompatible additions were added to garage. The courtyard was completely bricked over and all historic fabric including the fountain and landscape were removed. The front lawn and original steps from the sidewalk onto the front lawn are intact and contributing, although the front walk has been altered; historic photos show a straight front walk where today the walk is curved. Historic photos show the existing driveway, garden wall and double-door gate for the driveway which are intact, although an additional gate opening has been added to allow for pedestrian access. The rectangular fish pond located just north of the garage in the rear garden existed prior to the 1980 alterations.4 Physical examination of the fish pond and surrounding mature plantings determined the pond is substantial in age. Likewise, the pair of palms at the south edge of the brick patio are quite tall with thick trunks and appear substantial in age. The remaining landscaping on the property appears to have been planted within the last 30 years and is non-contributing. 4 Permit 53922, 12-30-80 316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 3 The exterior of the primary façade as well as the lot’s street frontage (front lawn and steps, garden wall, driveway and gate) provides the residence’s public identity and has high integrity. The primary facade exhibits no significant alterations, other than the glazed wrought-iron awnings and the paint coat. The building’s footprint, which is historically significant, is largely extant and the courtyard as well as the street frontage retains its spatial integrity. Parts of the northeast wing retain historic fabric, while it appears several of the openings were altered. Therefore it appears, that the primary street-fronting section, front public landscape (except for the front side walk), parts of the northeast wing, the footprint, and the courtyard space retain integrity and are historically significant. The two-story southwest wing and front garden wall/patio, brick landscaping in the courtyard, landscape plantings (except for two mature palms), the entire rear garage/guesthouse complex (except for the old fish pond), and parts of the northeast wing do not contribute to the historic significance of the property. BUILDING PERMITS Date  Permit#  Owner  Architect  Contractor  Cost   Notes  3/14/1923  1204  E.W. Halliday  C.L. Freeman 1,000 1‐rm, 1‐bath Servants  room addition to garage  8/18/1980  Z.A.  Charles Weber  Case  8' concrete block wall  #4297‐A  along back property line  5/20/1980  53028  Charles Weber  Iden Zaima Lang Construction  90,000 2‐story addition to existing  house (1,300 sq ft) and  garage addition (600 sq ft)  9/5/1980  53478  Charles Weber  Iden Zaima Lang Construction  4,800 8' concrete block wall  along back property line  12/30/1980  53992  Charles Weber  Harold Cass Westwood Pool Co. 12,000 684 sq ft Swimming pool  with spa  HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Santa Monica. In 1875, the original townsite of Santa Monica was surveyed, including all the land extending from Colorado Street on the south to Montana on the north, and from 26th Street on the east to the Pacific Ocean on the west. Between 1893 and the 1920s, the community operated as a tourist attraction, visited by mostly wealthy patrons. Those areas just outside of the incorporated city limits were semi-rural in setting and were populated with scattered residences. After the advent of the automobile in the 1920s, Santa Monica experienced a significant building boom, with homes being constructed in the tracts north of Montana and east of Seventh Street for year-round residents. Palisades Tract. The Palisades Tract neighborhood offers a remarkably intact ensemble of domestic architecture, primarily dating from the years 1906 to 1930. One of the oldest residential areas of the City of Santa Monica, the Palisades Tract was originally subdivided in 1905. The original tract included the area between Ocean Avenue and Seventh Street along six major east-west streets (Palisades Avenue, Alta Avenue, Marguerita Avenue, Georgina Avenue, San Vicente Boulevard, and Adelaide Drive). The Palisades Tract was 316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 4 extended to the east in 1912, to include portions of Seventh through Fourteenth Streets including Adelaide Place.5 Shortly after the tract was opened, the area in which it was located, stretching from Montana to Adelaide, was annexed to the City of Santa Monica. From that date, March 28, 1906, building records were kept by the city officials, and the first application to build was issued to the Alta Santa Monica Company for what is now 401 Marguerita. However, this was not the first building in the area, according to witness Luther Ingersoll in his Century History of Santa Monica Bay Cities, who assigned the honor of building the “first costly and architectural” residence in the Palisades to H.N. Hammond.6 Several prominent members of the community, as well as residents of Los Angeles and Pasadena in search of a seaside summer home, commissioned residences in the Palisades Tract. During the first fifteen years of development homes were in the Craftsman mode. The more intense period of construction in the twenties yielded numerous fine period revival- style homes, most of which were intended for year-round occupation. The work of several renowned architects is showcased, as well as the efforts of several Santa Monica building contractors who had a profound impact on the growth of the City.7 Among the architects represented in the area are John Byers (240 and 624 Alta, 300 and 404 Georgina, 547 7th), Robert Farquhar (247 Georgina [att.], 401 Ocean), Marsh and Russell (216 Georgina), Webber, Staunton and Spaulding (317 Georgina), Frederick Roehrig (325 Georgina), Hunt and Burns (525 Georgina), John and Donald Parkinson (701 Ocean), Greene and Greene (226 Palisades), and Robert Stacy-Judd (710 Adelaide Place). Several prolific builders, many of whom produced designs from their own offices and others of whom worked with architects, were involved in the development of the Palisades Tract. Adelaide Drive/Adelaide Place. Hugging the rim of Santa Monica, Adelaide Drive is one of the most spectacular locations in Santa Monica. It forms the northern boundary for the City and for the Palisades Tract. Although somewhat isolated from the rest of the city by San Vicente Boulevard, formerly the site of an interurban railroad line, Adelaide today is a quiet meandering street hidden behind the tall apartments on Ocean Avenue. The street is intersected twice, at Fourth Street and at Seventh Street, beyond which it is known as Adelaide Place. A landscaped island runs down the center of Adelaide Place, which is lined by houses on either side of a cul-de-sac. Adelaide Drive, on the other hand, is built-up on the south side only, with one exception, while the north side falls steeply into the canyon.8 Since the opening of the Palisades Tract in 1905, and annexation to the City in 1906, Adelaide has attracted numerous prominent southern Californians who hired some of the best architects available to create summer and, later, year-round homes for them. The first flurry of building lasted about five years and was concentrated on the western block of Adelaide. One of the first houses constructed on Adelaide was the R.C. Gillis House (circa 1906-1909), 5 Santa Monica Historical Resources Inventory (1985-1986): Final Report, p. 24. 6 Ibid, p. 24. 7 Ibid, p. 24. 8 Ibid, p. 20. 316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 5 406 Adelaide, designed by Myron Hunt and Elmer Grey. Gillis was one of the most prominent land developers in Santa Monica and the street is named after his daughter Adelaide.9 Other houses constructed during this period were the second Roy Jones House, 130 Adelaide (1907); Henry Weaver House, 142 Adelaide (1910); Rev. Bishop T. Conaty House, 144 Adelaide (1907); Isaac Milbank House, 236 Adelaide (1911); and H.M. Gorham House, 336 Adelaide (1906). A second spurt of building activity began on Adelaide in 1919, with the construction of a house for H.M. Gorham’s mother-in-law, Mrs. E. W. Holliday (316 Adelaide Drive). Gorham was instrumental in the organization of the Bank of Santa Monica and was associated with three houses along Adelaide. The third house associated with the Gorham’s was designed by John Byers at 326 Adelaide and is no longer a contributor to the district. The remainder of Adelaide was built primarily in the 1920s and 1930s in the revival styles popular at the time. Its architecture and the owners, the builders and the architects responsible link Adelaide to the development pattern that characterized all the area north of Montana Avenue during those decades. Homes built or remodeled since 1945 are relatively few in number and unobtrusive in appearance. With its strong sense of identity, both physical and historical, Adelaide Drive and Adelaide Place appears to be a potential City of Santa Monica historic district.10 A summary of the architectural resources along Adelaide Drive and Adelaide Place is presented in the table below. ADELAIDE DRIVE AND ADELAIDE PLACE POTENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT 11  Address  Photograph Constructed Notes  130 Adelaide  1907 Second Roy Jones House, City  of Santa Monica Landmark  #34, Designated 08/11/1997,  Original Owner Roy Jones,  Builder H.X. Goetz, Architect  Attributed to Robert  Farquhar      142 Adelaide  1910 Henry Weaver House, National  Register Landmark, City of Santa  Monica Landmark #20,  Designated 05/11/1989,  Original Owner Henry Weaver,  Architect/Builder Milwaukee  Building Company    9 State Historic Resources Inventory Forms, Adelaide Drive and Adelaide Place Historic Grouping; HGA, Johnson and Heumann, 1983, revised 1986; HRG, Updated 2002. 10 Historic Resources Inventory Update: North of Montana Survey Area (2002). 11 Santa Monica Historical Resources Inventory, Inventoried Sites in Area 1, 1985-1986 Final Report 316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 6 Address  Photograph Constructed Notes  144 Adelaide  1907 Original Owner Rev. Bishop T.  Conaty,  Builder Conner &  McGann  208 Adelaide  1941 Original Owner Frank R. Strong,  Builder Ben Harwood, Architect  Peter Whitehill  222 Adelaide  1933 Original Owner C. A. Collins,  Builder Geo. W. Holstein,  Architect John R. Kibbey  236 Adelaide  1911 Isaac Milbank House, City of  Santa Monica Landmark #30,  Designated 3/11/2002, Original  Owner Isaac Millbank,  Architect/Builder Meyer &  Holler/ Milwaukee Building Co.  316 Adelaide  1919 Original Owner Mrs. E.W.  Halliday, Architect Pierpont and  Walter Davis  316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 7 Address  Photograph Constructed Notes  336 Adelaide  1906 Original Owner H.M. Gorham,  Architect Robert Farquhar  406 Adelaide  c.1906‐1909 Gillis House, City of Santa    Monica Landmark #26,  Designated 3/8/1993,  Original Owner R.C. Gillis,  Architect/Builder Myron  Hunt and Elmer Grey       436 Adelaide  1926 Original Owner F.M. Dunig,  Architect Meyer Radon  506 Adelaide  1923 Structure of Merit #1,  Designated 6/20/1994, Original  Owner Frank L. Clark,  Architect/Builder John Byers   518 Adelaide  1925 Original Owner Lucern Corp.,  Architect Ruoff & Munson  316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 8 Address  Photograph Constructed Notes  526 Adelaide  1926 Original Owner Willard & Anna  Morse, Builder C. L. Freeman  540 Adelaide  1941/1948 710 Adelaide  1923 Worrell “Zuni House,” City of  Santa Monica Landmark #80,  Designated 3/10/2003, Original  Owner Worrell, Architect/  Builder Robert Stacey‐Judd    714 Adelaide  1923 Original Owner F.W. Armitage,  Builder Frank Roden  718 Adelaide  1923 Original Owner J.R. Teague,  Builder Dick & Taylor  316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 9 Address  Photograph Constructed Notes  722 Adelaide  1926 Original Owner J.R. Teague,  Builder R. Highet  725 Adelaide  1926 Original Owner N.S. Gandy,  Architect Frank Bivens   726 Adelaide  1927 Original Owner E.W. Clark,  Architect Van den Hoven  808 Adelaide  1906/1919 639 Adelaide  1923 (not included in  potential historic  district)  316 Adelaide Drive City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report page 10

Description:
From Howard F. Rissler, “Rendleman House: Museum of the Mississippi,” Journal of continued to practice medicine until his death in 1916.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.