ebook img

2018 Coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus non-structural proteins 8 and 12 form stable complex independent of the non PDF

2018·0.82 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview 2018 Coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus non-structural proteins 8 and 12 form stable complex independent of the non

Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect Virology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/virology Coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus non-structural proteins 8 and 12 MARK form stable complex independent of the non-translated regions of viral RNA and other viral proteins Yong Wah Tana,b,c,1, To Sing Funga,1, Hongyuan Shenc, Mei Huangb, Ding Xiang Liua,⁎ aSouthChinaAgriculturalUniversity,GuangdongProvinceKeyLaboratoryMicrobialSignals&DiseaseCo,andIntegrativeMicrobiologyResearchCentre,Guangzhou 510642,Guangdong,People'sRepublicofChina bSchoolofBiologicalSciences,NanyangTechnologicalUniversity,60NanyangDrive,63755,Singapore cInstituteofMolecularandCellBiology,61BiopolisDrive,Proteos138673,Singapore A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Thecleavageproductsfromcoronaviruspolyproteins,knownasthenon-structuralproteins(nsps),arebelieved Coronavirus to makeup themajor components of theviral replication/transcription complex. In thisstudy, severalnsps Infectiousbronchitisvirus encodedbyaviangammacoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus(IBV)werescreenedforRNA-bindingactivity IBV andinteractionwithitsRNA-dependentRNApolymerase,nsp12.Nsp2,nsp5,nsp8,nsp9andnsp10werefound Non-structureprotein tobindtountranslatedregions(UTRs),whilensp8wasconfirmedtointeractwithnsp12.Nsp8hasbeenreported RNA-dependentRNApolymerase tointeractwithnsp7andfunctionsasaprimasesynthesizingRNAprimersfornsp12.Furthercharacterization Proteininteraction revealedthatnsp8-nsp12interactionisindependentoftheUTRsofviralRNA,andnsp8interactswithboththe RNAsynthesis Viralgenomereplication N-andC-terminalregionsofnsp12.Theseresultshavepromptedaproposalofhowthensp7-nsp8complexcould possiblyfunctionintandemwithnsp12,formingahighlyefficientcomplexthatcouldsynthesizeboththeRNA primerandviralRNAduringcoronavirusinfection. 1. Introduction (gRNA)andanestedsetofpositive-sensesgRNAs.Thekeyplayerinthis part of the coronavirus life cycle is the virus-encoded replicase gene, Coronaviruses are a family of enveloped viruses with single which makes up two thirds of the genome and is translated into two stranded,positivesenseRNAgenomeof27–30kbinlength.Infectious polyproteins: pp1a and pp1ab. The two polyproteins are then auto- bronchitis virus (IBV) is an avian gammacoronavirus that causes re- proteolyticallyprocessedinto16non-structuralproteins(nsps)bytwo spiratorydiseaseinchickens,resultinginmajoreconomicburdentothe virus-encodedproteases,thepapain-likeproteaseencodedinnsp3and poultry industry worldwide. In IBV-infected cells, a 3′-coterminal the 3C-like (main) protease encoded in nsp5 (Liu et al., 1994, 1995, nested set of six mRNA species, including the genome-length mRNA 1997,1998;LiuandBrown,1995;NgandLiu,1998,2000,2002;Lim (mRNA1)andfivesubgenomicmRNAspecies(mRNA2-6),isexpressed. andLiu,1998;Limetal.,2000;Xuetal.,2001;Fangetal.,2008;Chen Four structural proteins, the type 1 glycoprotein spike (S), the small etal.,2009).Notably,duetothelackofacleavagesitethatusuallylies membrane-associated envelope protein (E), the integral membrane between nsp1 and nsp2 in other coronaviruses, cleavage of the IBV protein(M)andthephosphorylatednucleocapsid protein(N),areen- replicase only produces 15 nsps (nsp2-16) without the counterpart of coded by subgenomic mRNA(sgRNA) 2,3,4 and6,respectively (Liu nsp1. Based on sequence comparison, biochemical and structural stu- etal.,1991;LiuandInglis,1992a;Zhaoetal.,1993).Inaddition,four dies,theenzymaticactivitiesrequiredformostofthekeyprocessesin accessory proteins, 3a, 3b, 5a and 5b are encoded by sgRNA 3 and 5 coronavirus RNA synthesis have been mapped to some of the nsps (LiuandInglis,1992a,1992b). (Pasternak et al., 2006). Among them, the key enzyme critical to the During coronavirus infection, full-length genome is replicated for viralabilitytoreplicateitsgenomeandpropagateinthehostcellisthe packaging into progeny virions, while sgRNAs are transcribed for the RNA-dependentRNApolymerase(RdRP)ornsp12.Availableevidence expression of structural proteins. These two processes are dependent suggests that the RNA polymerase activity of nsp12 may be primer- uponviralabilitytosynthesizeboththepositive-sensegenomicmRNA dependent(teVelthuisetal.,2010)andrequiretheprimaseactivityof ⁎Correspondingauthor. E-mailaddress:[email protected](D.X.Liu). 1Equalcontribution. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2017.10.004 Received28July2017;Receivedinrevisedform27September2017;Accepted2October2017 0042-6822/ © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 nsp8(Imbertetal.,2006).Otherimportantenzymaticactivitiesinclude 2.2. Mammaliancellculture,virusinfectionandoverexpression theRNAhelicaseofnsp13(Seybertetal.,2000;Ivanovetal.,2004a), the methyltransferase activities of nsp14 and nsp16 (Y. Chen et al., H1299 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented 2009;Maetal.,2015;Decrolyetal.,2008;Chenetal.,2011;Bouvet with5%FBSand1%PS.Cellsweregrownina37°Cincubatorsupplied et al., 2010), the exoribonuclease activity of nsp14 (Ma et al., 2015; with 5% CO . For infection experiments, cells were collected by cen- 2 Minskaia et al., 2006) and the endoribonuclease activity of nsp15 trifugation at 600rpm for 5min, re-suspended in fresh serum-free (Ivanovetal.,2004b;Bhardwajetal.,2004;Ricagnoetal.,2006). medium,andapproximately2.5×106cellswereseededintoa60mm Informationonthespecificinteractionsamongnspsisalsoemerging dish. based on biochemical, structural and functional studies of nsps from Amonolayerofcellsgrownto100%confluencywaswashedwith othercoronaviruses(Imbertetal.,2006;Maetal.,2015;Imbertetal., serum-free medium twice and inoculated with virus at multiplicity of 2008;vonBrunnetal.,2007;Panetal.,2008;Brockwayetal.,2003; infection (MOI) of approximately 2, unless specified. Cells were in- Subissi et al., 2014; Knoops et al., 2008). Distinct from the viral cubatedat37°Cwith5%CO beforeharvestedforanalysisatspecific 2 structuralproteins,thefunctionsservedbythenspsarefocusedonthe timepoints.Fortime-courseexperiments,0hsampleswereharvested modulation ofhostenvironment tosupport viralreplication andviral afterthecellswereincubatedfor5min. RNAsynthesis.Integralmembraneproteinsnsp3,nsp4andnsp6engage Vaccinia/T7 recombinant virus, used for overexpression of genes, in homotypic and heterotypic interactions to drive membrane re- waspreparedbyinfectingVerocellsandharvestedbythreefreeze-thaw arrangements to form the network of double membrane vesicles cycles,asdescribedpreviously(J.Wangetal.,2009).H1299cellswere (DMVs) and convoluted membranes (CMs) (Angelini et al., 2013), or grown to 80–90% confluency and infected with the virus for 1h at doublemembranespherulesfromzipperedERmembranes(Maieretal., 37°C,5%CO .PlasmidDNAwasdeliveredintotheinfectedcellswith 2 2013),thesitesofviralreplicationandalsoserveasthedockingsitefor Effectene® transfection reagent. The cells were incubated with the viral replication complexes (Oostra et al., 2008). A recent study has transfectionmixfor20hin37°Cbeforebeinglysed. identifiedcriticalresiduesonnsp7andnsp8ofsevereacuterespiratory syndromecoronavirus(SARS-CoV),whichareessentialforefficientde 2.3. Polymerasechainreaction(PCR)andsite-directedmutagenesis novoRNAsynthesisbynsp12,indicatingthatinteractionsamongthese proteinscontributetotheprocessivityofRNAsynthesis(Subissietal., Amplification of DNA not exceeding 2000 base pairs (bp) was 2014). achievedusingKAPATaqDNApolymerase(KapaBiosystemsInc,USA) On the other hand, interaction between the nsps and viral RNA orFermentasTaqDNApolymerase(ThermoScientific,USA).Ina50µl genome has not been thoroughly studied. Viral protein-RNA interac- reaction, 150ng of template DNA was mixed with 1.5pmol of each tionsareassumedtooccurbetweenthekeyreplicationenzymes,nsp7, primer,2nmolofeachdexoyribonucleotidetriphosphate,1mMMgSO 4 nsp8andnsp12,thusformingacomplexexhibitingreplicaseactivityin and1.5UofKODHotStartDNApolymerase.Eighteenthermalcycles the presence of a RNA primer (Subissi et al., 2014). In addition, al- were used for amplification and each product was purified, digested though some nsps have not been assigned with functions involved in with DpnI to remove template DNA and purified again before trans- coronavirus RNA synthesis, they might still be participating in viral formationforselection. RNAreplicationortranscription.Inthisstudy,atwo-prongedapproach was adopted to study viral proteins and protein-RNA interactions in 2.4. InvitrotranscriptionandlabelingofRNAprobes coronavirus RNA synthesis. To elucidate RNA-protein interactions, an attemptwasmadetodetectthepresenceofRNA-bindingactivityinany All biotin-labeled probes used in biotin pull-down assay were oftheIBVnsps,whichhadnotbeenpreviouslyreportedtopossesssuch transcribed with PCR products using appropriate primer pairs, as de- an activity. This was done using available constructs over-expressing scribedpreviously(Tanetal.,2012).AstretchofpolyTisincludedin individual nsps in a biotin pull-down assay with biotinylated probes. the5′endofreverseprimersforthetemplatesofpositivesenseRNAor The second method used was to conduct a screen for protein-protein forwardprimersforthetemplatesofnegativesenseRNA,sothatthein interactionsbetweenviralpolymerase,nsp12andothernsps. vitrotranscribedRNAwillcontainastretchofpolyAtailtofacilitate RNA stability. Briefly, a template for EGFP (-) was amplified from pEGFP-N1 using pT-EGFP_F (5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTATG- 2. Materialandmethod GTGAGCAAGGGCGAGG-3′) and T7-EGFP_510-528R (5′-TGTAATACG- ACTCACTATAGGGCTGCCGTCCTCGATGTTG-3′). IBV 5′-UTR (+) and 2.1. Antibodies,enzymesandotherreagents IBV 5′-UTR (-) probes were generated from PCR fragments amplified fromplasmidpKT-IBVAwiththeprimerpairsT7_i1-27(5′-TGTAATA- Antibodies to β-tubulin, FLAG and HA tags were purchased from CGACTCACTATAGGACTTAAGATAGATATTAATATATATCT-3′)/ Sigma-Aldrich(St.Louis,MO,USA).AntiseraagainstIBVproteinswere pT_i507-528R (5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTTGTCACTGTCTATT- made by immunization of rabbits with bacterially expressed fusion GTATGT-3′)andpT_i1-29(5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTACTTAAGA- proteinsaspreviouslydescribed(Liuetal.,1991;Fangetal.,2005).All TAGATATTAATATATATGTAT-3′)/T7_i528-506R(5′-TGTAATACGACT- horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies were CACTATAGGGTTGTCACTGTCTATTGTATGTC-3′),respectively.IBV3′- purchasedfromDako(Glostrup,Denmark)andAlexaFluor®conjugated UTR(+)probewastranscribedfromthePCRproductamplifiedfrom secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen Molecular pGEM T easy-IBVE plasmid with primers T7_i27106-27125 (5′-TGTA- Probes® (Eugene, OR, USA). T7 RNA polymerase and Biotin RNA La- ATACGACTCACTATAGGGTAACATAATGGACCTGTTG-3′) and LDX30 beling Mix were purchased from Roche Applied Science (Penzberg, (5′-TGATGCCGGCCACGATGCGTC-3′). Upper Bavaria, Germany). Taq polymerase and KOD Hot Start DNA For in vitro transcription, template DNA fragments were purified Polymerase were purchased from KAPA Biosystems (Cambridge, MA, andelutedinRNase-freewater.LinearizedplasmidDNA(1μg)orPCR USA)andMerck(Darmstadt,Germany),respectively. fragment(200ng)wasincubatedwith10UT7RNApolymerase,10U RPMI 1640 medium and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium Protector RNase Inhibitor and NTPs (1mM each of ATP, CTP, GTP, (DMEM) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fetal UTP)in1Xtranscriptionbufferprovidedwiththepolymerase,at37°C Bovine Serum (FBS) was purchased from Thermo Scientific HyClone for 2h. The transcription mix was incubated with 5U of DNase I at (Waltham,MA,USA).Penicillin-streptomycinsolution(PS)and0.25% 37°C for 15min to remove template DNA. For labeling of RNA pro- Trypsin-EDTA solution were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, ducts,NTPswerereplacedwithBiotinRNALabelingMix(1mMeachof USA). ATP, CTP, GTP, 0.65mM UTP, 0.35mM biotin-16-UTP). Transcripts 76 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 A B C Fig. 1.Construction and characterization of a re- combinant IBV expressing HA-tagged RdRP (rIBV- wt 0 4 8 H1A2 16 24 hpi 250- wt 8H A w t 2 4H hApi wtCLH A I P w: t - HHAA HHsio1An2-R9id9nRccPee)lll.lssawi.nefKreeicntieentdfiecwctaietndhawlryIisBtihVs-aoHpfApHr-RoAxd-iRRmPda.RteCPloyen2xflpuMreeOnstI- 250- 150- 215500-- ofwildtypeIBV(wt)andrIBV-HA-RdRP(HA),re- spectively. Cellsinfected with rIBV-HA-RdRPwere 150- 100- 100- -nsp12 harvestedat0,4,8,12,16and24hpost-infection, respectively. As acontrol, cells infected with wild 100- -HA-RdRP 75- 75- typeIBVwereharvestedat16hpost-infection.Total celllysateswereprepared,andproteinsweresepa- 50- 50- ratedon8%SDS-PAGEandanalyzedbyWesternblot 75- 37- with anti-HA antibodies. Numbers on the left in- N 37- dicateproteinsizesinkilodalton.b.Replicationof 50- rIBV-HA-RdRPinH1299cells.ConfluentH1299cells wereinfectedwithapproximately2MOIofwildtype WB: -IBVN WB: -HA WB: -nsp12 IBV(wt)andrIBV-HA-RdRP(HA),respectively.The infectedcellswereharvestedat8and24hpost-in- fection,respectively.Totalcelllysateswereprepared,proteinswereseparatedon15%SDS-PAGEandanalyzedbyWesternblotwithanti-Nantisera.Numbersontheleftindicateprotein sizesinkilodalton.c.ImmunoprecipitationofHA-nsp12inrIBV-HA-RdRP-infectedH1299cellswithHA-beads.ConfluentH1299cellswereinfectedwithapproximately2MOIofwild typeIBV(wt)andrIBV-HA-RdRP(HA),respectively.Theinfectedcellswereharvestedat16hpost-infectionandtotalcelllysateswereprepared.Proteinsinthetotalcelllysateswere eitherseparatedon15%SDS-PAGEdirectlyorsubjectedtoimmunopecipitationwithanti-HAbeadsbeforebeingloadedontothegel.AnalysisofHA-nsp12expressionandim- munoprecipitationefficiencywasdonebyWesternblotwithanti-nsp12antisera.Numbersontheleftindicateproteinsizesinkilodalton. were purified with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) 2.7. ConstructionofIBVnsp12truncationmutants andstoredat−80°C. Allnsp12truncationmutantswerecreatedbyamplificationofthede- siredfragmentfrompXL-IBVC,whichcontainedtheIBVgenomefromnu- 2.5. Biotinpull-downassay cleotide 8689–15526. Fragments amplified with primer pairs i12339- 12360_BamHIF (5'-TTGGATCCGAATTATTTAAACGGGTACGGG-3') / i135 Allproteinsusedinthisassaywerewholecelllysatespreparedfrom 38_13516_XhoIR (5'-TTCTCGAGTTATAACGCACAAACACTAAAACAAG-3'), Vaccinia/T7-infected H1299 cells over-expressing N-terminal FLAG- i13296-13316_BamHIF (5'-TTGGATCCATACCGCAGACTTCTTTCGGT-3') / epitope tagged proteins. EGFP over-expressed with the same method i14498-14474_XhoIF (5'-TTCTCGAGTTAGCTCTTAATATTATCATAGACAA wasusedasanegativecontrol.Ina200µlbindingreaction,0.1µMof TA-3') and i13926-13948_BamHIF (5'-TTGGATCCAAGAAGAATGTCC biotin-labeled RNA was mixed with 150µl of total cell lysate in the TACCCACTAT-3') / i15128-15106_XhoIR (5'-TTCTCGAGTTATTGTAAAG presenceof10mMDTT,20µgofyeasttRNA,200UofRNaseinhibitor TCGTAGGAGCTCTAT-3') were cloned into vector pXJ40-Myc generating and nuclease-free water. The reaction was incubated at room tem- plasmids that could express N-terminally tagged proteins Myc-iNsp12n, peraturewithgentlerotationfor30min.40µlofstreptavidinagarose Myc-iNsp12m,Myc-iNsp12c. beads (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added directly into the tube and the mixture was incubated at room temperature with gentle rotation for 3. Result 30min,andthencentrifugedat1000rpmfor5min.500µlofRNaseP (RP) buffer (50mM KCl, 1mM MgCl2, 10mM HEPES, pH 7.5) were 3.1. ConstructionandcharacterizationofarecombinantIBVexpressingan usedtowashthebeadstriceandthebufferwasremovedthoroughlyby HA-epitopetaggednsp12 gentlyaspirationafterthelastwash.25µlof2XSDSloadingdyewith DTTwasmixedwiththebeadsandthemixtureincubatedat100°Cfor A recombinant IBV which expressed an N-terminally HA-epitope 10min,cooledatroomtemperaturebeforeloadedontoaPAGEgelof tagged nsp12 (rIBV-HA-RdRP) was constructed using reverse genetics anappropriateconcentration. (Fangetal.,2008,2007,2010).TheHAtagwasinsertedatnucleotide position12319whichistwoaminoacidsdownstreamofthecleavage site between nsp10 and nsp11/12. The recovered recombinant virus 2.6. ProteinelectrophoresisandWesternblotanalysis grewwellinH1299cells. Approximately 2 MOI of wild type and the recombinant IBV, re- Polyacrylamidegelswerepreparedwith30%acrylamide/bissolu- spectively,wereusedtoinfectconfluentH1299cells.Theinfectedcells tion (29:1) in 375mM Tris and 0.1% SDS. The electrophoresis was were harvested at 24h post-infection and total cell lysates were pre- performed with 1X Tris-Glycine running buffer (25mM Tris, 250mM pared.TheexpressionkineticsoftheHA-taggednsp12incellsinfected glycine, 0.1% SDS). Resolved proteins were visualized by 30min of with rIBV-HA-RdRP was studied in a time-course experiment. H1299 coomassiebluestaining(0.25%(w/v)CoomassieBrilliantBlueR-250, cellsinfectedwiththeviruswereharvestedat0,4,8,12,16and24h 20%methanol,10%glacialaceticacid)ortransferredontoamembrane post-infection,respectively,andanalyzedbyWesternblotwithanti-HA forimmune-detection.Gelswereequilibratedin1Xwettransferbuffer monoclonalantibodies.CellsinfectedwithwildtypeIBVharvestedat (48mM Tris, 39mM glycine, 20% methanol) before transferred onto 16h post-infection were also included as a control. The HA-tagged either nitrocellulose or PVDF membranes. Transfer was performed in nsp12wasinitiallydetectedat12hpost-infectionandpeakedat16h 1Xwettransferbufferat4°C.Membranewasblockedinblockingso- post-infection(Fig.1a).Asexpected,thesamebandwasnotobservedin lution(10%(w/v)non-fatmilkin1XPBS)for1hatroomtemperature cellsinfectedwithwildtypeIBV(Fig.1a). and incubated with the primary antibody at an appropriate con- Cells infected with wild type and the recombinant rIBV-HA-RdRP centration for 1h. The membrane was washed with PBS-T (1X PBS, harvestedat8and24hpost-infectionwerealsoanalyzedbyWestern 0.1%Tween®-20)threetimesandincubatedwithsecondaryantibodyat blotfortheexpressionlevelofIBVNproteinwithanti-Nantisera.As a1:2000dilutionfor1h.ThemembranewaswashedwithPBS-Tthree shown inFig. 1b,Nprotein expression wasobserved incells infected times and Western Lightning®-ECL from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, withbothwildtypeIBVandrIBV-HA-RdRP.Infact,slightlyhigherlevel USA)wasappliedontothemembranefordetection. of N protein expression was detected in cells infected with rIBV-HA- RdRP (Fig. 1b), indicating that tagging of RdRP with an HA epitope 77 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 doesnotaffectIBVreplicationincells. weightbandswerelikelypartiallyprocessedproductsofpp1aorpp1ab, TheexpressionofwildtypeandHA-taggednsp12intheseinfected whichincludednsp8 andnsp10,respectively, andthus weredetected cells as well as the immunoprecipitation efficiency and specificity of by the antibodies. Many antisera used during this screening were un- HA-tagged nsp12 with α-HA coated beads (HA-beads) were then de- abletodetecttheircorrespondingproteinbandsinthecelllysates,due termined by Western blot with a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against to the low expression level of these proteins during IBV infection in nsp12(α-RdRP).ThiswasdonetoensurethatHA-taggednsp12could additiontothelowlevelsofantibodiesinthesera. be efficiently pulled-down for detection of other co-precipitated viral andcellularproteins.AscanbeseeninFig.1c,acomparablelevelof 3.3. Furtherconfirmationoftheinteractionbetweennsp8andnsp12 wildtypeandHA-taggednsp12wasdetectedincellsinfectedwiththe respectiveviruses,butonlyHA-nsp12wasprecipitatedbyHA-beads. To further confirm that nsp8 interacts with nsp12, im- munoprecipitationofnsp12wasrepeatedwithHA-beads.Inaddition,a 3.2. Screenfornon-structuralproteinsthatinteractwithnsp12 reciprocalprecipitationwasperformedusinganti-nsp8serum.Thely- sateswerepreparedandthebead-boundproteinswereelutedwith2X Wethendecidedtoidentifyviralstructural,non-structuralandac- SDSloadingdyeandresolvedby8%and15%SDS-PAGEgels.Asshown cessoryproteinsthatwereco-precipitatedwiththeHA-taggedRdRPby inFig.3A,HA-nsp12wasdetectedincellsinfectedwithrIBV-HA-RdRP Western blot with available antisera. Confluent H1299 cells grown in afterprecipitationwithanti-nsp8serum.Similarly,precipitationofcell 80cm2 flasks were infected with wild-type and rIBV-HA-RdRP, re- lysates with anti-HA antibodies led to the co-precipitation of nsp8 in spectively,andharvestedat16hpost-infectionbylysiswith800µlof cells infected with the recombinant virus (Fig. 3B). It was also noted LysisBufferforeachflask.HA-beads(20µlof50%slurry)wereadded thatadominantbandwithanapparentmolecularweightof64kDawas to 500µl of each lysate to precipitate HA-nsp12 and any other inter- detectedinbothtotalcelllysatesandinprecipitatedsamplesfromrIBV- actingproteinsfromthelysates.Theboundproteinswereelutedwith HA-RdRP-infected cells(Fig.3B).This mayrepresentthecleavage in- 55µlof 2X SDS loading dye andresolved by8% and 15% SDS-PAGE termediate covering nsp7/8/9/10. Although the interaction between gel.Becausesimilarnumbersofcellswereusedforinfectionandvirus nsp8 and nsp12 has been reported before for SARS-CoV (von Brunn replication was comparable, the protein levels of host housekeeping etal.,2007),itwasnotreportedinothercoronavirusesandtheinter- genesweresimilarincellsinfectedwithwild-typerIBVandrIBV-HA- actionhasnotbeensubjectedtoanin-depthstudy.Inthesubsequent RdRP, as determined by Western blot analysis of GAPDH and β-actin sections,theinteractionbetweenthesetwoproteinswasfurtherchar- (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1c, HA-tagged nsp12 could be acterized. specifically detected in the cell lysate and co-precipitated samples in cells infected with rIBV-HA-RdRP but not in cells infected with wild- 3.4. Interactionbetweennsp8andnsp12intheabsenceofotherviral type rIBV. Detection of co-precipitated proteins was performed by structuralandnon-structuralproteins WesternblotusingavailableantiseraforIBVnspsaswellasstructural proteins S and N. We noted that some antisera (especially α-nsp15) Thephysicalinteractionbetween nsp8andnsp12wasfurtherstu- pickeduponeormorenon-specificbands.Onlyifthetargetproteinof diedbyco-expressionofthetwoproteinsintheabsenceofotherviral correctmolecularweightwasdetectedatsimilarlevelsinthewholecell proteinsandviral genomic RNA.Theproteinswere co-expressedasa lysates, but could only be detected in the co-immunoprecipitated FLAG-tagged protein for nsp8 (FLAG-nsp8) and a Myc-tagged protein samplefromrIBV-HA-RdRP-infectedcells,itwouldbeconsideredtobe for nsp12 (Myc-nsp12) inH1299 cells. As controls, dual vector trans- apotentialinteractingpartnerofHA-taggednsp12. fected samples (FLAG + Myc) and single vector transfected samples Theresultsoftheco-immunoprecipitationwerepresentedinFig.2. (FLAG-nsp8 + Myc and FLAG + Myc-nsp12) were included. For the structural proteins, S protein was not detected in the im- Immunoprecipitationwasperformedwithanti-Myccoatedbeads(Myc- munoprecipitated samples, while a similar level of N was detected in beads) and the bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Western cellsinfectedwithwildtypeIBVandrIBV-HA-RdRP(HA)(Fig.2,pa- blot was then performed using anti-FLAG-HRP and anti-Myc-HRP an- nels anti-IBV SandN).Although itappeared that theamountco-pre- tibodiestodetecttheprecipitatedproteins.AsshowninFig.4,FLAG- cipitated in rIBV-HA-RdRP-infected samples was slightly higher com- nsp8 wasdetected atalmostequal amounts whetheritwasexpressed paredtowildtypeIBVinfectedsamples,theamountdetectedinthecell togetherwithMyconly(FLAG-nsp8+Myc)orwithMyc-nsp12(FLAG- lysateswasalsoslightlyhigher.SoitwasunlikelyforNtohavebeen nsp8+Myc-nsp12),butwasdetectedintheMycpulled-downsamples specifically co-precipitated by an interaction with nsp12. Nsp3, nsp5, onlywhenitwasco-expressedwithMyc-nsp12(Fig.4,leftpanel).The nsp8 and nsp14, but not nsp10, nsp13 and nsp15/nsp16, were speci- ~50kDabanddetectedinallimmunoprecipitatedsampleswaslikely fically detected in the precipitated samples of rIBV-HA-RdRP-infected tobetheheavychainelutedfromthebeadsduringsamplepreparation cells(Fig.2).Aspreviouslyreported,adominantbandwithanapparent for SDS-PAGE. Also, Myc-nsp12 was detected in both the cell lysates molecularweightof58kDacouldbedetectedbyWesternblotincells andimmunoprecipitatedsamples(Fig.4,rightpanel).AsFLAG-nsp8in infected with wild type IBV with anti-nsp14 antiserum (Fang et al., the immunoprecipitated sample was detected only when Myc-nsp12 2007). This was proved to be a nonspecific band from our previous wasco-expressed,itwasconcludedthatFLAG-nsp8wascoprecipitated work(Xuetal.,2010).Asnsp14bandisusuallyveryweakandmigrates withMyc-nsp12byinteractingwithit.Theseresultsconfirmthatnsp12 onSDS-PAGEgeljustbelowthisnon-specificband,muchmoresamples couldinteractwithnsp8intheabsenceofotherviralproteinsandviral were added during precipitation and gel loading, leading to the de- genomic/subgenomicRNAs. tectionofaspecificbandrepresentingnsp14inHA-beadsprecipitated samples(Fig.2).However,thisbandcannotbeseparatedfromthenon- 3.5. EffectofRNaseAtreatmentontheinteractionbetweennsp8andnsp12 specificbandintotalcelllysates(Fig.2).Anti-nsp13antibodiesfailed todetectaspecificbandrepresentingnsp13eitherintotalcelllysatesor WethentestediftreatmentofcelllysateswithRNaseAwouldaffect in HA-beads precipitated samples (Fig. 2). This issue will be further the interaction between the two proteins. For this purpose, im- studiedbyusingarecombinantviruswithHA-taggednsp13(Zhaietal., munoprecipitation was performed with cell lysates that were either 2005). treated(+RNaseA)ornottreated(-RNaseA)with50µg/mlofRNase AdditionalhighermolecularweightbandswerealsodetectedinHA- A at 37°C for 1h before adding anti-Myc (Myc-beads) or anti-FLAG beadsprecipitatedsampleswithanti-nsp8andanti-nsp10antisera,al- (FLAG-beads) coated beads. As shown in Fig. 5A, nsp8 was still pre- thoughaspecificbandrepresentingthensp10wasnotdetected(Fig.2). cipitated whenRNAwasremoved,suggesting thattheinteraction be- Based on their apparent molecular masses, these higher molecular tween the two proteins is not mediated through their simultaneous 78 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA 250- 250- 250- 82.2- 82.2- 150- 64.2- -7/8/9/10 64.2- -nsp3 48.8- 48.8- 150- 150- 100- 37.1- 37.1- -9/10/11 -7/8(8/9) 100- 100- 75- 25.9- -nsp8 25.9- -9/10 50- 75- 19.4- 19.4- 75- -nsp2 37- -nsp10 -nsp5 14.8- 14.8- 50- 50- 25- 37- 6.0- 6.0- WB: -nsp2 WB: -nsp3 WB: -nsp5 WB: -nsp8 WB: -nsp10 CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA CL IP: -HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA 250- 250- 150- 250- 250- 250- 150- 150- 150- 100- 100- 100- 150- S 75- 75- 75- 100- 100- --nnss*p14 75- 75- 50- 50- 50- -(nsp13) 37- N 50- 50- -nsp15 37- 37- 25- -nsp16 37- WB: -nsp13 WB: -nsp14 WB: -nsp15 WB: -IBV N WB: -IBV S Fig.2.Co-precipitationIBVnon-structuralproteinswithHA-nsp12inrIBV-HA-RdRP-infectedH1299cells.ConfluentH1299cellswereinfectedwithapproximately2MOIofwildtype IBV(wt)andrIBV-HA-RdRP(HA),respectively.Theinfectedcellswereharvestedat16hpost-infectionandtotalcelllysateswereprepared.Proteinsinthetotalcelllysateswereeither separatedon8%and15%SDS-PAGEdirectlyorsubjectedtoimmunopecipitationwithanti-HAbeadsbeforebeingloadedontothegel.IBVproteinsexpressedintheinfectedcellsandco- precipitatedwithHA-nsp12wereanalyzedbyWesternblotwithantiseraspecifiedundereachpanel.Antiserawhichwereusedbutnotpresentedwereforthefollowingproteins:nsp7, ORF3a,ORF3b,ORF5aandE.Arepresentativeresultoftwoindependentexperimentswasshown.Numbersontheleftindicateproteinsizesinkilodalton,andtheidentitiesoftheIBV proteinsareindicatedontheright. A B Fig.3.CoprecipitationofIBVnsp8withHA-nsp12 Vero H1299 Vero H1299 and vice versa in both Vero and H1299 cells. a. ConfluentH1299andVerocellswereinfectedwith CL IP: -nsp8 CL CL IP: -HA CL approximately2MOIofwildtypeIBV(wt)andrIBV- wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA wt HA HA-RdRP(HA),respectively.Theinfectedcellswere 115.5- harvestedat16hpost-infectionandtotalcelllysates 181.8- 64.2- -7/8/9/10 wereprepared.Proteinsinthetotalcelllysateswere 48.8- eitherseparatedon8%SDS-PAGEdirectlyorsub- 115.5- -HA-nsp12 jected to immunopecipitation with anti-nsp8 anti- 25.9- -nsp8 82.2- serumbeforebeingloadedontothegel.Analysisof the expression of HA-nsp12 and the im- 64.2- 19.4- munoprecipitation efficiencywasdonebyWestern -HC 48.8- blot with anti-HA antibodies. Numbers on the left indicate protein sizes in kilodalton. b. Confluent 37.1- H1299andVero cellswereinfectedwithapproxi- 14.8- mately2MOIofwildtypeIBV(wt)andrIBV-HA- -LC RdRP (HA), respectively. The infected cells were harvestedat16hpost-infectionandtotalcelllysates WB: -HA WB: -nsp8 wereprepared.Proteinsinthetotalcelllysateswere eitherseparatedon15%SDS-PAGEdirectlyorsub- jectedtoimmunopecipitationwithanti-HAbeadsbeforebeingloadedontothegel.Analysisoftheexpressionofnsp8andtheimmunoprecipitationefficiencywasdonebyWesternblot withanti-nsp8antibodies.Numbersontheleftindicateproteinsizesinkilodalton. interactions with RNA. Similar result was also obtained in the re- subgenomicviralRNA. ciprocalco-immunoprecipitationusinganti-FLAGantibody(Fig.5B).A lowlevelofMyc-nsp12wasdetectedinthewholecelllysate,duetothe 3.6. Nsp8interactswiththeN-andC-terminalregionsofnsp12 loadingofthesmallamountofcelllysateasinput,ascomparedwith the large amount of cell lysate used for co-immunoprecipitation. The two reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation experiments thus confirmed Wethensetuptomapthedomain(s)onnsp12responsibleforthe interaction between the twoproteins. ThreeMyc-tagged deletion mu- thatnsp8interactsdirectlywithnsp12andfurthersupportedthatthis tantsofnsp12werecreated,asshowninFig.6a.Becausethetruncated interaction is not dependent on the presence of the genomic and mutantsencodepeptidefragmentswithupto400aminoacidresidues, 79 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 A B Fig. 4.Formation of FLAG-nsp8 and Myc-nsp12 IP:α-Myc IP:α-Myc complex in cells over-expressing the two epitope- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 tagged proteins. H1299 cells were grown to 80% Myc Myc M-nsp M-nsp Myc Myc M-nsp M-nsp Myc Myc M-nsp M-nsp Myc Myc M-nsp M-nsp ccoonmflbuinenancytviarnudsfoirnf1echteadt3w7i°tCh,5V%acCciOn2ia./PTl7asmried- 181.8 FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ -8+Fnsp 181.8 FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ F-nsp8+ FLAG+ F-nsp8+ DEc3u7ffNbe°AaCctteewidnnaecws®ubiTtdahretaolnitrvhsefeberecetftdroiaornneisnfRtteohceetaiytgohenwentem.irneiTxfehlcyeftoseecrdde2ll0wcseihwltlhseirnLewytiishtnihes- 115.5 115.5 -M-nsp12 buffer. Total cell lysates were either separated on 82.2 82.2 15% SDS-PAGE directly or subjected to im- 64.2 64.2 48.8 48.8 munopecipitationwithanti-Mycbeadsbeforebeing 37.1 37.1 loadedontothegel.Analysisoftheexpressionofthe over-expressed proteins and their co-im- 25.9 -F-nsp8 25.9 munoprecipitation was done by Western blot with 19.4 19.4 anti-FLAG(A)andanti-Myc(B)antibodies,respec- tively.Numbersontheleftindicateproteinsizesin 14.8 14.8 kilodalton. WB:α-FLAG WB:α-Myc we hypothesized that critical domains and/or protein folding motifs itsmiddleregion.TheabsenceofMyc-taggedproteinco-precipitation wouldremainintact,andthusthestructuralfeaturesandstabilityofthe insampleswhichwereco-expressedwithFLAG-epitope,indicatedthat mutants would not be drastically affected. The three mutants encode theco-precipitationofMyc-nsp12nandMyc-nsp12cweredependenton IBV nsp12 fragments with considerable overlaps, to ensure that po- thepresenceandtheirinteractionwithFLAG-nsp8,aswasthecasefor tential nsp8 interacting domain(s) disrupted by the margin of a frag- Myc-nsp12. mentwouldstillremainintactinanothermutant. The three mutants and full-length nsp12 (Myc-nsp12) were either co-expressedwithFLAG-nsp8.Thecelllysateswereprobedtoassessthe 3.7. Biotinpull-downscreenforRNA-bindingactivityofIBVnon-structural expression levels of the different nsp12 mutants. As shown in Fig. 6b proteins (left),full-lengthMyc-nsp12wasdetectedathighlevelsintransfected cells.ProteinlevelsofMyc-nsp12nandMyc-nsp12cwereslightlylower, PlasmidsbasedonthevectorpXJ40-FLAGinsertedwithnucleotide whilethatofMyc-nsp12mwasconsiderablylowercomparedwiththe sequencesofnspseitherintandem(nsp7/8fusionandnsp8/9fusion) full-length protein, suggesting that the deletion mutants were not as orindividually were usedto over-express theproteins inVaccinia/T7 stableasthefull-lengthprotein.Thecelllysateswerealsoprecipitated virus-infectedH1299cells.Duetoeithertheverylowexpressioneffi- withFLAG-beadsandtheboundproteinswereresolvedbySDS-PAGE ciencyorthelack ofdistinctive band,thescreendatafornsp3,nsp4, anddetectionwasmadewithanti-Myc-HRPantibody.Asexpected,the nsp6andnsp13werenotincluded.Totalcelllysateswereusedinbiotin full-lengthMyc-nsp12interactedstronglywithFLAG-nsp8andwasef- pull-down assays with biotinylated 5′-UTR (+), 5′-UTR (-) or 3′-UTR ficientlyco-precipitated.Ontheotherhand,thelevelofco-precipitated (+)RNAprobes.AsthefocusofthestudywasonnegativestrandRNA protein was lower for Myc-nsp12n and considerably lower for Myc- synthesis, only the positive sense UTRs and the 5′-UTR (-), which nsp12c,comparedwiththatoffull-lengthnsp12.Nodetectablelevelof contains the anti-leader TRS important for strand-transfer during dis- Myc-nsp12m could be co-precipitated (Fig. 6b, right). Therefore, the continuous transcription of negative strands, were included in the nsp8 interacting domain(s) in nsp12 was attributed mainly by the N- screen.Theproteinsboundtothestreptavidinbeadswereresolvedby terminalregion,andtoalesserdegreebytheC-terminalregion,butnot SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blot using anti-FLAG-HRP anti- body.EGFPwasalsoincludedasanon-bindingproteinnegativecontrol A B Fig. 5.Co-precipitation of FLAG-nsp8 and Myc- IP:α-Myc IP:α-FLAG nsp12intotalcelllysateswithorwithoutRNaseA Myc Myc M-nsp12 M-nsp12 Myc Myc M-nsp12 M-nsp12 Myc Myc M-nsp12 M-nsp12Myc Myc M-nsp12 M-nsp12 tflvriuereauntsmcfyeonratn.1dHhi1na2fte9c39te7dc°eCwl,lsit5h%wVerCaecOc2gin.rioPawl/aTns7mtiordec8Do0mN%bAincwoaannst- + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + delivered into the infected cells with Effectene® FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8FLAG F-nsp8 FLAG F-nsp8 TthreantsrfaencstfieocntiRoneamgeinxt.foTrh2e0cehllisnwtheree3i7nc°uCbiantceudbwatiothr 181.8 181.8 beforetheywerelysedwithLysisbuffer.Aportionof 115.5 82.2 115.5 -M-nsp12 thelysateswastreatedwith50µg/mlofRNaseAat 64.2 82.2 37°Cfor1h.Bothtreatedanduntreatedcelllysates 48.8 +RNaseA 37.1 were either separated on 8% and 15% SDS-PAGE 25.9 -F-nsp8 +RNaseA64.2 directly or subjected to immunopecipitation with 19.4 48.8 -HC anti-Myc(A)andanti-FLAG(B)beads,respectively before being loaded onto the gel. Analysis of the 14.8 37.1 expressionoftheover-expressedproteinsandtheir 181.8 co-immunoprecipitation was done by Westernblot 11852..52 115.5 -M-nsp12 withanti-FLAG(A)andanti-Myc(B)antibodies,re- 4648..28 82.2 spectively.Numbersontheleftindicateproteinsizes 37.1 64.2 inkilodalton. -RNaseA 25.9 -F-nsp8 -RNaseA -HC 19.4 48.8 14.8 37.1 -LC WB:α-FLAG WB:α-Myc 80 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 A Myc Fig.6.Mappingtheregionsonnsp12responsibleforinteraction Myc-nsp12 withnsp8.a.SchematicdiagramofMyc-taggednsp12truncation 1 940 mutantproteins.Numeralsindicateaminoacidpositions.b.The Myc-nsp12n N- and C-terminal portions of IBV nsp12 co-precipitated with 1 400 FLAG-nsp8 using FLAG-beads. Full-length and truncated nsp12 proteinsorMyc(vectorcontrol) wereco-expressedwithFLAG Myc-nsp12m 328 729 (vectorcontrol)orFLAG-nsp8.Thecelllysateswereprecipitated withFLAG-beadsandboundproteinswereanalyzedwithwestern Myc-nsp12c blotting using α-Myc. Full-length nsp12 and mutants nsp12n 538 938 (residues 9 – 400), nsp12c (residues 538 – 938) were co-pre- cipitated by the beads. A representative result of three in- dependentexperimentswasshown. B lysate IP:α-FLAG Myc-nsp12M M-nsp12n M-nsp12m M-nsp12cMyc M-nsp12 M-nsp12n M-nsp12m M-nsp12c Myc-Mnsp12 M-nsp12n M-nsp12m Mnsp-12cMyc M-nsp12 M-nsp12n M-nsp12m M-nsp12c ++ + + ++ + + + + ++ + + ++ + + + + FLAGFLAG FLAG FLAG FLAG-Fnsp8 F-nsp8 F-nsp8 F-nsp8 F-nsp8 FLAGFLAG FLAG FLAG FLAGF-nsp8 F-nsp8 F-nsp8 F8-nsp F-nsp8 181.8 115.5 -M-nsp12 82.2 64.2 48.8 -M-nsp12n M-nsp12c 37.1 25.9 19.4 WB: -Myc ineachscreen.ForthescreenconductedusingbiotinylatedIBV5′-UTR hamperedbythedifficultyofexpressing/detectingcertainnsps,suchas (+), individual nsps, two fusion proteins, nsp7/8 and nsp8/9, and nsp4andnsp13,aswellastheinsolubilityofnsp6,aproteincontaining EGFP were over-expressed in H1299 cells infected with Vaccinia/T7 multipletransmembranedomains(Oostraetal.,2008). recombinant virus on 60mm dishes. Cells were lysed with 250µl of One previously undocumented interaction between nsp2 and viral Lysis Buffer and used immediately. Biotin pull-down assay was per- RNA was founded by the screen. This finding adhered to a previous formedwith0.1µM(finalconcentration)biotinylatedIBV5′-UTR(+) reportofnsp2possiblybeingaweakantagonistofPKR(X.Wangetal., probewith150µlcelllysate,andstreptavidinbeadswereusedtopurify 2009),whichrequiresdouble-strandedRNAforactivation.Thescreen the biotinylated RNA from the mixture. Proteins bound to the beads alsoshowed that nsp9 andnsp10 only bindto some butnot allthree through interactions with the bound RNA were eluted with 2X SDS probes tested. This is unexpected as both proteins were previously loadingdye.ForWesternblotanalysis,10µlofcelllysateandallofthe documentedtohaveRNA-bindingactivitieswithanon-specificnature elutedproteinsweredenaturedandresolvedbySDS-PAGE.Detectionof (B. Chen et al., 2009; Egloff et al., 2004; Joseph et al., 2006). This theFLAG-taggednspsandEGFPwereperformedwithanti-FLAG-HRP could, however, be explained by the generally weak interactions of and anti-EGFP antibodies, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7a, proteins thesetwoproteinsandtheRNAprobesthatcouldescapedetectionin that were able to co-purify with the biotinylated probe in the assay oneormoreofthescreens.Theinteractionbetweennsp8andIBV3′- werensp2,nsp10andtoalesserextent,nsp5. UTR (+) may have provided another piece of evidence that nsp8 is Similarbiotinpull-downassayswithbiotinylated5′-UTR(-)and3′- heavilyinvolvedinviralRNAsynthesis,asaRNA-primersynthesizing UTR (+) probes were performed to screen for interacting proteins. enzymefornsp12.Itshouldalsobenotedthattheobserveddifferential Proteinswhichco-purifiedwiththebiotinylated5′-UTR(-)RNAprobe interactions of these nsps with UTRs in cells overexpressing these werensp2,nsp5andnsp10(Fig.7b).Nsp2,nsp5,nsp8andnsp9were proteinsmaybeduetothefactthattheamountsoftheover-expressed shown to be interacting with the biotinylated 3′-UTR (+) probe nsps may be likely rather different from those expressed in virus-in- (Fig.7c).Amongthem,nsp5showedstronginteraction,nsp2,nsp8and fectedcells. nsp9showedamoderatelevelofinteractionwithIBV3′-UTR(Fig.7c). Attempts to depict a more complete map of viral protein-protein interactionswerealsohamperedbythelimitedavailabilityofsensitive antiseratosomeviralproteins,especiallythoseofthelessimmunogenic 4. Discussion nspsandaccessoryproteins.Compoundedbythefactthatmanynon- structural and accessory proteins were expressed in much lower Inthisstudy,wehaveshownthatIBVnsp12isabletocomplexwith amountscomparedtostructuralproteins,theirdetectionincelllysates anumberofothernon-structuralproteins,includingnsp3,nsp5,nsp8 provedtobemuchmoredifficult.Outofthesixnspswhichcouldbe and nsp14. Further characterization of the nsp8-nsp12 complex de- detected by the available antisera, nsp3, nsp5, nsp8 and nsp14 were monstratedthattheformationofthiscomplexisindependentofthe5′- identified as binding partners to nsp12. Nsp8-nsp12 interaction was and3′-UTRsofviralRNAandothernsps.Nsp8interactswithnsp12at reportedinanORFeomescreenforSARS-CoV(vonBrunnetal.,2007). twopoints,boththeN-andC-terminialregionsoftheprotein.Analysis Sinceithasnotbeenproventoexistinothercoronaviruses,reporting of viral RNA-protein interactions using thebiotin pull-down assay re- thesameinteractioninIBVsuggeststhatitishighlyprobablethatthe vealedthatnsp2,nsp8,nsp9andnsp10exhibitRNA-bindingactivityto interactionholdstrueforallothercoronaviruses. eitheroftheUTRs.Theeffortstodrawamorecompletepicturewere 81 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 A EGFP nsp2 nsp5 nsp7 nsp7/8 nsp8/9 nsp10 nsp12 nsp14 nsp15 nsp16 etal.,2012).Thensp7-nsp8hexadecamericcomplexwhichwasshown 250 C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E tobethesecondRdRPofcoronavirusrequiringnoprimertofunction 115000 andsynthesizingshortlengthRNAnon-specificallyfulfilledtheroleas 75 50 theprimasefornsp12(Imbertetal.,2006). 37 +) R( Alikely,althoughpremature,modelthatwouldfitthemappedin- 221505 5-UT’ tteerramcitnioanlsrewgioounlsdoifndniscpa1t2e awidthiretchteinnstper7a-cntsipo8ncboemtwpeleexn.tIhnethNis- manoddeCl-, thensp7-nsp8complexwouldfirstsynthesizeaRNA-primerofasuffi- B EGFP nsp2 nsp5 nsp7 nsp8 nsp9 nsp10 nsp12 nsp14 nsp15 nsp16 cient length, which would be exposed to and binds to the N-terminal C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E regionofnsp12,broughtincloseproximitythroughitsinteractionwith 125500 nsp8.TheextensionoftheRNAchaincouldthenbecatalyzed bythe 10705 polymerase domain in the C-terminal region of nsp12, which would 5307 R-)( also be oriented in close proximity to the end of the RNA-primer 25 UT through its interactions at its N-terminal region with nsp8. This ar- 20 5’- rangement of the two RdRPs would ensure the high efficiency of the 15 replicase complex as the RNA primers synthesized by nsp8 could be utilizedbynsp12immediatelyfortranscriptionelongation.Thisputa- C EGFP nsp2 nsp5 nsp7 nsp8 nsp9 nsp10 nsp12 nsp14 nsp15 nsp16 tivemodelissupportedbystructuralstudiesshowingthatnsp8isavery C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E elongatedmolecule(Xiaoetal.,2012),itcouldbeeasilyspanningthe 64.2 N-andtheC-terminalregionsofnsp12.Furthercharacterizationofthe 48.8 3275..19 R(+) ipnrtoeproascetidonmobdeetwliesevnalinds.pI8naadndditinosnp,1i2deinstirfiecqautiiroendantodcahscaerartcatienriziaftitohne T 19.4 U oftheinteractionsbetweennsp12andothernspsaswellastheinter- 14.8 3’- actionsamongothernspswouldberequiredtodepictamorecomplete 6.0 pictureoftheviralreplication/transcription complex.Attemptstoco- Fig.7.ScreenforIBVnon-structuralproteinsthatinteractwiththe5′-UTR(+),5′-UTR expressallnspsinthesamecellsweremade,butnopresentabledata (-)and3′-UTR(+)ofIBV.a.IBVnsp2,nsp5andnsp10showedbindingactivitytoits5′- weregenerated,possiblyduetothelowexpressionefficiencyofseveral UTR(+).Biotinpull-downassayofnon-structuralproteinswithIBV5′-UTR(+).Cell nspsandtheevenlowerexpressionefficiencywhenco-expressingthem. lysatesofH1299cellsover-expressingdifferentnon-structuralproteinswereincubated Structural information, especially the resolution of the nsp12 withbiotinylated5′-UTR(+)probesandpurifiedusingstreptavidinbeads.Boundpro- structurewouldbeofparticularimportanceinconfirmingiftheinter- teinswereresolvedbySDS-PAGEandwesternblotwasperformed.Proteinswhichdidnot actions detected between its N- and C-terminal regions and nsp8 are expresswerenotpresented.C:celllysate,E:elution.Arepresentativeresultoftwoin- spatiallypossible.However,asthestructuresofcoronavirusnsp12are dependentexperimentswasshown.b.IBVnsp5andnsp10showedbindingactivitytoits 5′-UTR(-).Biotinpull-downassayofnon-structuralproteinswithIBV5′-UTR(-).Cell notsolvedtilldate,onlypredictionsofitsstructureareavailable.This lysatesofH1299cellsover-expressingdifferentnon-structuralproteinswereincubated wouldbeoneofthemostimportantstudiesrequiredforelucidationof withbiotinylated5′-UTR(-)probesandpurifiedusingstreptavidinbeads.Boundproteins thecooperationbetweennsp8andnsp12.Likewise,theinteractionsite wereresolvedbySDS-PAGEandwesternblotwasperformed.Theexpressionofnsp2was onnsp8shouldalsobemappedasitsinteractionwithnsp12wouldonly notdetectableforthisassayandwasexcluded.C:celllysate,E:elution.Arepresentative be meaningful if it is confined to the exterior of the hexadecameric resultoftwoindependentexperimentswasshown.c.IBVnsp5,nsp8andnsp9showed complex.Subissietal.haveidentifiedP183andR190ontheSARS-CoV bindingactivitytoIBV3′-UTR(+).Biotinpull-downassayofnon-structuralproteinswith IBV 3′-UTR (+). Cell lysates of H1299 cells over-expressing different non-structural nsp8 to be essential for its interaction with SARS-CoV nsp12 (Subissi proteinswereincubatedwithbiotinylated3′-UTR(+)probesandpurifiedusingstrep- et al., 2014). It would be interesting to examine whether the corre- tavidinbeads.BoundproteinswereresolvedbySDS-PAGEandwesternblotwasper- sponding residues in IBV nsp8 is also required for nsp12-binding. In formed.C:celllysate,E:elution.Arepresentativeresultoftwoindependentexperiments addition,functionalstudiesbyintroducingmutationsattheinteraction wasshown. sites could be performed to ascertain if the interaction between nsp8 andnsp12iscrucialfortheprocessivityofthereplicasecomplex. Thensp8bindingactivityinnsp12appearedtobepresentinboth Coronavirus nsp9 was shown to be a weak, non-specific single- Myc-nsp12n and Myc-nsp12c, its N- and C-terminally truncated mu- stranded nucleic acid binding protein (ssDNA and ssRNA) (B. Chen tants. Coincidentally, it was reported for SARS-CoV that both a p12 etal.,2009;Egloffetal.,2004).Itwasinterestingthatnsp9wasfound fragmentinitsN-terminalandap64fragmentinitsC-terminalregions tointeractweaklyonlywithIBV3′-UTR(+)andnotatallwiththe5′- wererequiredfortheRdRPactivityofnsp12(Chengetal.,2005).The UTRinbothpolarity. There isstillapossibility ofnsp9 beingable to p12andp64fragmentswereshowntoformastablecomplexandthe bind particular regions of the coronavirus genome in a sequence spe- p12fragmentmayplayaroleinprimer-bindingwhilethep64fragment cificmanner,and3′-UTR(+)couldhavebeenitsspecificinteraction contains the polymerase activity. Therefore, the ability of nsp8 to in- partner.Conversely,thelowaffinitybindingcouldimplythattheweak teract with Myc-nsp12n (residues 9–400) seemed to add a piece of affinitybindingtothebiotinylatedprobewasofanon-specificnature. supportingevidencefortheroleofthep12fragmentinprimer-binding. Further studies would be required to verify the specificity of the in- This offers an interesting perspective on the coordination between teraction. coronavirusnsp8andnsp12inviralRNAsynthesis. Theactualstructureofnsp10iscontroversial.Inonestudy,nsp10is Information pertaining to how the initiation of coronavirus nega- describedasadodecamer,butthesamestructurewasnotobservedin tive-strand synthesis is limited and only in the recent years has more another study (Su et al., 2006). In fact, no dodecamer formation has information been available with regards to the source of the primer beendescribedforthisproteininsolution(Josephetal.,2006).Nsp10 requiredforRdRP(nsp12)tobefunctioning(teVelthuisetal.,2010). isacofactorforboththe2′O-methyltransferaseactivityofnsp16,and ThestructureofSARS-CoVnsp7-nsp8complexhasbeensolvedbytwo theN7-guanine-methyltransferase/exoribonucleaseactivitiesofnsp14 groups(Zhaietal.,2005;Xiaoetal.,2012),revealingahexadecameric (Decroly et al., 2008; Bouvet et al., 2012). As a stimulatory factor, 8:8 complex between the two proteins, and a 2:1 heterotrimer of the nsp10mayenhancethe2′-O-methyltransferaseactivityofnsp16which twoproteinsinthecrystalaswellasinsolution,respectively.denovo catalyzestheconversionofthecap-0structureonm7GpppA-RNAtoa RNAsynthesishasalsobeendemonstratedfornsp7andnsp8fromboth cap-1structure(Decrolyetal.,2008).Nsp10wasalsoshowntoexhibit SARS-CoV andfelinecoronavirus(FeCoV)(Xiaoetal.,2012;Velthuis low-affinity binding to ssRNA, dsRNA and dsDNA in the absence of 82 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 other viral proteins (Joseph et al., 2006). Hence, in a case similar to Fang,S.G.,Shen,H.,Wang,J.,Tay,F.P.L.,Liu,D.X.,2008.Proteolyticprocessingof nsp9,thebindingofnsp10toIBV5′-UTR(-)couldalsobeoflow-spe- polyproteins1aand1abbetweennon-structuralproteins10and11/12of Coronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirusisdispensableforviralreplicationincultured cificity. cells.Virology379(2),175–180. Nsp2wasfoundtointeractwithIBV5′-UTR(+)anditcouldnotbe Imbert,I.,Guillemot,J.,Bourhis,J.,Bussetta,C.,Coutard,B.,Egloff,M.,etal.,2006.A concludedifitboundtoIBV5′-UTR(-)and3′-UTR(+).Althoughnsp2 second,non‐canonicalRNA‐dependentRNApolymeraseinSARSCoronavirus.EMBO J.25(20),4933–4942. was not reported to be a RNA-binding protein, it had been demon- Imbert,I.,Snijder,E.J.,Dimitrova,M.,Guillemot,J.-C.,Lécine,P.,Canard,B.,2008May. stratedasaweakantagonistofPKRantagonist(X.Wangetal.,2009),a TheSARS-CoronavirusPLncdomainofnsp3asareplication/transcriptionscaffolding dsRNA-activated kinase. Although the mechanism of this antagonism protein.VirusRes.133(2),136–148. Ivanov,K.A.,Thiel,V.,Dobbe,J.C.,vanderMeer,Y.,Snijder,E.J.,Ziebuhr,J.,2004a. hasyettobedetermined,itislogicaltoproposethatnsp2mightactasa Multipleenzymaticactivitiesassociatedwithsevereacuterespiratorysyndrome competitive dsRNA-binding protein, preventing PKR from being acti- coronavirushelicase.J.Virol.78(11),5619–5632. vated bydsRNA synthesizedbythevirusduring replication andtran- Ivanov,K.A.,Hertzig,T.,Rozanov,M.,Bayer,S.,Thiel,V.,Gorbalenya,A.E.,etal.,2004b. Majorgeneticmarkerofnidovirusesencodesareplicativeendoribonuclease.Proc. scription. Natl.Acad.Sci.USA101(34),12694–12699. It was intriguing to find nsp5 interacting with all three probes Joseph,J.S.,Saikatendu,K.S.,Subramanian,V.,Neuman,B.W.,Brooun,A.,Griffith,M., tested, of which its interactions with the 5′-UTR (-) and 3′-UTR (+) etal.,2006.Crystalstructureofnon-structuralprotein10fromthesevereacutere- spiratorysyndromecoronavirusrevealsanovelfoldwithtwozinc-bindingmotifs.J. were rather strong. Nsp5 is a 3C-like protease, one of the proteases Virol.80(16),7894–7901. involved in the proteolytic processing of the replicase gene products. Knoops,K.,Kikkert,M.,VanDenWorm,S.H.E.,Zevenhoven-Dobbe,J.C.,VanDerMeer, Havingnopriorreportsofitpossessing RNA-bindingactivity,thisre- Y.,Koster,A.J.,etal.,2008.SARS-coronavirusreplicationissupportedbyare- ticulovesicularnetworkofmodifiedendoplasmicreticulum.PLoSBiol.6(9),e226. presents a novel piece of information with regards to the function of Lim,K.P.,Liu,D.X.,1998.Characterizationofthetwooverlappingpapain-likeproteinase nsp5inadditiontoitsroleasamainproteaseandwouldwarrantfur- domainsencodedingene1ofthecoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirusandde- therstudies. terminationoftheC-terminalcleavagesiteofan87-kDaprotein.Virology245(2), 303–312. Lim,K.P.,Ng,L.F.,Liu,D.X.,2000.Identificationofanovelcleavageactivityofthefirst Acknowledgement papain-likeproteinasedomainencodedbyopenreadingframe1aofthecoronavirus Avianinfectiousbronchitisvirusandcharacterizationofthecleavageproducts.J. ThisworkwaspartiallysupportedbyanAcademicResearchFund Virol.74(4),1674–1685. Liu,D.,Inglis,S.,1992a.IdentificationoftwonewpolypeptidesencodedbymRNA5of (AcRF)Tier2grant(ACR47/14),MinistryofEducation,Singapore. thecoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus.Virology.186(1),342–347. Liu,D.,Inglis,S.,1992b.InternalentryofribosomesonatricistronicmRNAencodedby References infectiousbronchitisvirus.JVirol.66(10),6143–6154. Liu,D.,Cavanagh,D.,Green,P.,Inglis,S.,1991.ApolycistronicmRNAspecifiedbythe coronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus.Virology.184(2),531–544. Angelini,M.M.,Akhlaghpour,M.,Neuman,B.W.,Buchmeier,M.J.,2013.Severeacute Liu,D.X.,Brown,T.D.,1995.CharacterisationandmutationalanalysisofanORF1a- respiratorysyndromecoronavirusnon-structuralproteins3,4,and6inducedouble- encodingproteinasedomainresponsibleforproteolyticprocessingoftheinfectious membranevesicles.MBio4(4),e00524–13. bronchitisvirus1a/1bpolyprotein.Virology209(2),420–427. Bhardwaj,K.,Guarino,L.,Kao,C.C.,2004.Thesevereacuterespiratorysyndromecor- Liu,D.X.,Brierley,I.,Tibbles,K.W.,Brown,T.D.,1994.A100-kilodaltonpolypeptide onavirusNsp15proteinisanendoribonucleasethatprefersmanganeseasacofactor. encodedbyopenreadingframe(ORF)1bofthecoronavirusinfectiousbronchitis J.Virol.78(22),12218–12224. virusisprocessedbyORF1aproducts.JVirol.68(9),5772–5780. Bouvet,M.,Debarnot,C.,Imbert,I.,Selisko,B.,Snijder,E.J.,Canard,B.,etal.,2010.In Liu,D.X.,Tibbles,K.W.,Cavanagh,D.,Brown,T.D.,Brierley,I.,1995.Identification, vitroreconstitutionofSARS-coronavirusmRNAcapmethylation.PLoSPathog.6(4), expression,andprocessingofan87-kDapolypeptideencodedbyORF1aofthe e1000863. coronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus.Virology.208(1),48–57. Bouvet,M.,Imbert,I.,Subissi,L.,Gluais,L.,Canard,B.,Decroly,E.,2012.RNA3′-end Liu,D.X.,Xu,H.Y.,Brown,T.D.,1997.Proteolyticprocessingofthecoronavirusin- mismatchexcisionbythesevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusnon-struc- fectiousbronchitisvirus1apolyprotein:identificationofa10-kilodaltonpolypeptide turalproteinnsp10/nsp14exoribonucleasecomplex.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA109 anddeterminationofitscleavagesites.J.Virol.71(3),1814–1820. (24),9372–9377. Liu,D.X.,Shen,S.,Xu,H.Y.,Wang,S.F.,1998.Proteolyticmappingofthecoronavirus Brockway,S.M.,Clay,C.T.,Lu,X.T.,Denison,M.R.,2003.Characterizationoftheex- infectiousbronchitisvirus1bpolyprotein:evidenceforthepresenceoffourcleavage pression,intracellularlocalization,andreplicationcomplexassociationoftheputa- sitesofthe3C-likeproteinaseandidentificationoftwonovelcleavageproducts. tivemousehepatitisvirusRNA-dependentRNApolymerase.J.Virol.77(19), Virology246(2),288–297. 10515–10527. Ma,Y.,Wu,L.,Shaw,N.,Gao,Y.,Wang,J.,Sun,Y.,etal.,2015.Structuralbasisand vonBrunn,A.,Teepe,C.,Simpson,J.C.,Pepperkok,R.,Friedel,C.C.,Zimmer,R.,etal., functionalanalysisoftheSARScoronavirusnsp14-nsp10complex.Proc.Natl.Acad. 2007.Analysisofintraviralprotein-proteininteractionsoftheSARScoronavirus Sci.USA112(30),9436–9441. ORFeome.PloSOne2(5),e459. Maier,H.J.,Hawes,P.C.,Cottam,E.M.,Mantell,J.,Verkade,P.,Monaghan,P.,etal., Chen,B.,Fang,S.,Tam,J.P.,Liu,D.X.,2009.FormationofstablehomodimerviatheC- 2013.Infectiousbronchitisvirusgeneratesspherulesfromzipperedendoplasmic terminalalpha-helicaldomainofcoronavirusnon-structuralprotein9iscriticalfor reticulummembranes.MBio4(5),e00801–e00813. itsfunctioninviralreplication.Virology383(2),328–337. Minskaia,E.,Hertzig,T.,Gorbalenya,A.E.,Campanacci,V.,Cambillau,C.,Canard,B., Chen,Y.,Cai,H.,Pan,J.,Xiang,N.,Tien,P.,Ahola,T.,etal.,2009.Functionalscreen etal.,2006.DiscoveryofanRNAvirus3′->5′exoribonucleasethatiscritically revealsSARScoronavirusnon-structuralproteinnsp14asanovelcapN7methyl- involvedincoronavirusRNAsynthesis.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA103(13), transferase.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA106(9),3484–3489. 5108–5113. Chen,Y.,Su,C.,Ke,M.,Jin,X.,Xu,L.,Zhang,Z.,etal.,2011.Biochemicalandstructural Ng,L.F.,Liu,D.X.,1998.Identificationofa24-kDapolypeptideprocessedfromthe insightsintothemechanismsofSARScoronavirusRNAribose2′-O-methylationby coronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus1apolyproteinbythe3C-likeproteinaseand nsp16/nsp10proteincomplex.PLoSPathog.7(10),e1002294. determinationofitscleavagesites.Virology243(2),388–395. Cheng,A.,Zhang,W.,Xie,Y.,Jiang,W.,Arnold,E.,Sarafianos,S.G.,etal.,2005. Ng,L.F.,Liu,D.X.,2000.Furthercharacterizationofthecoronavirusinfectiousbronchitis Expression,purification,andcharacterizationofSARScoronavirusRNApolymerase. virus3C-likeproteinaseanddeterminationofanewcleavagesite.Virology272(1), Virology335(2),165–176. 27–39. Decroly,E.,Imbert,I.,Coutard,B.,Bouvet,M.,Selisko,B.,Alvarez,K.,etal.,2008. Ng,L.F.P.,Liu,D.X.,2002.Membraneassociationanddimerizationofacysteine-rich,16- Coronavirusnon-structuralprotein16isacap-0bindingenzymepossessing(nu- kilodaltonpolypeptidereleasedfromtheC-terminalregionofthecoronavirusin- cleoside-2′O)-methyltransferaseactivity.J.Virol.82(16),8071–8084. fectiousbronchitisvirus1apolyprotein.J.Virol.76(12),6257–6267. Egloff,M.-P.,Ferron,F.,Campanacci,V.,Longhi,S.,Rancurel,C.,Dutartre,H.,etal., Oostra,M.,Hagemeijer,M.C.,vanGent,M.,Bekker,C.P.,teLintelo,E.G.,Rottier,P.J., 2004.Thesevereacuterespiratorysyndrome-coronavirusreplicativeproteinnsp9is etal.,2008.Topologyandmembraneanchoringofthecoronavirusreplication asingle-strandedRNA-bindingsubunituniqueintheRNAvirusworld.Proc.Natl. complex:notallhydrophobicdomainsofnsp3andnsp6aremembranespanning.J. Acad.Sci.USA101(11),3792–3796. Virol.82(24),12392–12405. Fang,S.,Chen,B.,Tay,F.P.L.,Ng,B.S.,Liu,D.X.,2007.Anarginine-to-prolinemutation Pan,J.,Peng,X.,Gao,Y.,Li,Z.,Lu,X.,Chen,Y.,etal.,2008.Genome-wideanalysisof inadomainwithundefinedfunctionswithinthehelicaseprotein(Nsp13)islethalto protein-proteininteractionsandinvolvementofviralproteinsinSARS-CoVreplica- thecoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirusinculturedcells.Virology358(1), tion.PloSOne3(10),e3299. 136–147. Pasternak,A.O.,Spaan,W.J.M.,Snijder,E.J.,2006.Nidovirustranscription:howtomake Fang,S.,Shen,H.,Wang,J.,Tay,F.P.L.,Liu,D.X.,2010Jul.Functionalandgenetic sense...?J.Gen.Virol.87(Pt6),1403–1421. studiesofthesubstratespecificityofcoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus3C-like Ricagno,S.,Egloff,M.-P.,Ulferts,R.,Coutard,B.,Nurizzo,D.,Campanacci,V.,etal., proteinase.J.Virol.84(14),7325–7336. 2006.CrystalstructureandmechanisticdeterminantsofSARScoronavirusnon- Fang,S.G.,Shen,S.,Tay,F.P.L.,Liu,D.X.,2005.Selectionofandrecombinationbetween structuralprotein15defineanendoribonucleasefamily.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA minorvariantsleadtotheadaptationofanaviancoronavirustoprimatecells. 103(32),11892–11897. Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun.336(2),417–423. Seybert,A.,Hegyi,A.,Siddell,S.G.,Ziebuhr,J.,2000.Thehumancoronavirus229E 83 Y.W.Tanetal. Virology 513 (2018) 75–84 superfamily1helicasehasRNAandDNAduplex-unwindingactivitieswith5′-to-3′ implicationinvirionassemblyandbudding.PloSOne4(3),e4908. polarity.RNANY6(7),1056–1068. Wang,X.,Liao,Y.,Yap,P.L.,Png,K.J.,Tam,J.P.,Liu,D.X.,2009.Inhibitionofprotein Su,D.,Lou,Z.,Sun,F.,Zhai,Y.,Yang,H.,Zhang,R.,etal.,2006.Dodecamerstructureof kinaseRactivationandupregulationofGADD34expressionplayasynergisticrolein severeacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusnon-structuralproteinnsp10.JVirol. facilitatingcoronavirusreplicationbymaintainingdenovoproteinsynthesisinvirus- 80(16),7902–7908. infectedcells.J.Virol.83(23),12462–12472. Subissi,L.,Posthuma,C.C.,Collet,A.,Zevenhoven-Dobbe,J.C.,Gorbalenya,A.E., Xiao,Y.,Ma,Q.,Restle,T.,Shang,W.,Svergun,D.I.,Ponnusamy,R.,etal.,2012.Non- Decroly,E.,etal.,2014.Onesevereacuterespiratorysyndromecoronavirusprotein structuralproteins7and8offelinecoronavirusforma2:1heterotrimerthatexhibits complexintegratesprocessiveRNApolymeraseandexonucleaseactivities.Proc.Natl. primer-independentRNApolymeraseactivity.J.Virol.86(8),4444–4454. Acad.Sci.USA.111(37),E3900–E3909. Xu,H.Y.,Lim,K.P.,Shen,S.,Liu,D.X.,2001.Furtheridentificationandcharacterization Tan,Y.W.,Hong,W.,Liu,D.X.,2012Jun.Bindingofthe5′-untranslatedregionofcor- ofnovelintermediateandmaturecleavageproductsreleasedfromtheORF1bregion onavirusRNAtozincfingerCCHC-typeandRNA-bindingmotif1enhancesviral oftheaviancoronavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirus1a/1bpolyprotein.Virology288 replicationandtranscription.NucleicAcidsRes.40(11),5065–5077. (2),212–222. teVelthuis,A.J.W.,Arnold,J.J.,Cameron,C.E.,vandenWorm,S.H.E.,Snijder,E.J., Xu,L.,Khadijah,S.,Fang,S.,Wang,L.,Tay,F.P.L.,Liu,D.X.,2010.ThecellularRNA 2010.TheRNApolymeraseactivityofSARS-coronavirusnsp12isprimerdependent. helicaseDDX1interactswithcoronavirusnon-structuralprotein14andenhances NucleicAcidsRes.38(1),203–214. viralreplication.J.Virol.84(17),8571–8583. teVelthuis,A.J.W.,Worm,V.D.,SH,E.,Snijder,E.J.,2012.TheSARS-coronavirus Zhai,Y.,Sun,F.,Li,X.,Pang,H.,Xu,X.,Bartlam,M.,etal.,2005.InsightsintoSARS-CoV nsp7+nsp8complexisauniquemultimericRNApolymerasecapableofbothdenovo transcriptionandreplicationfromthestructureofthensp7–nsp8hexadecamer.Nat. initiationandprimerextension.NucleicAcidsRes.40(4),1737–1747. Struct.Mol.Biol.12(11),980–986. Wang,J.,Fang,S.,Xiao,H.,Chen,B.,Tam,J.P.,Liu,D.X.,2009.Interactionofthecor- Zhao,X.,Shaw,K.,Cavanagh,D.,1993.PresenceofsubgenomicmRNAsinvirionsof onavirusinfectiousbronchitisvirusmembraneproteinwithbeta-actinandits coronavirusIBV.Virology196(1),172–178. 84

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.