Bridgewater ‐ Route 104 from South Street to the Raynham Town Line Stoughton ‐ Route 138 from Brock Street to the Canton Town Line Old Colony Planning Council 70 School Street Brockton, MA 02301 Prepared under MassDOT Contract #69649 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan Acknowledgements and Title VI Notice of Protection The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the Old Colony Planning Council expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation. The Old Colony MPO fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. The MPO operates without regard to race, color, national origin, creed, income, gender, age, and disability. Any person who believes him/herself or any specific class of persons, to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI may by him/herself or by representative file a written complaint with the MPO. A complaint must be filed no later than 180 days after the date of the alleged discrimination. Please contact Pat Ciaramella at 508‐583‐1833 for more information. Report Preparation Ray Guarino, Transportation Planner [email protected] Eric Arbeene, Community Planner [email protected] Data Collection and Analysis James R. Watson, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor [email protected] Rodrigo Marion, Transportation Planner [email protected] Jed Cornock, Transportation Planner [email protected] Bruce Hughes, Economic Development/Community Planner [email protected] William McNulty, Transportation Planner [email protected] Kyle Mowatt, Assistant Planner [email protected] Mapping and Graphics Susan McGrath, GIS Coordinator [email protected] Andrew Vidal, Communications/GIS/IT Specialist [email protected] i | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan OLD COLONY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Linda M. Balzotti Mayor, City of Brockton Mathew Muratore Chairman, Board of Selectmen, Plymouth Eldon Moreira Chairman, Board of Selectmen, West Bridgewater Daniel Trabucco Board of Selectmen, Pembroke Richard A. Davey Secretary, MassDOT Frank DePaola Highway Administrator, MassDOT Reinald Ledoux, Jr. Administrator, BAT Robert G. Moran Jr. President, OCPC JOINT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE JTC OFFICERS JTC Chairman Noreen O’Toole JTC Vice Chairman Sid Kashi, P.E. JTC DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES ABINGTON ‐ Delegate Kenan Connell ABINGTON ‐ Alternate Bruce Hughes AVON Ed Sarni BRIDGEWATER ‐ Delegate Robert Wood BROCKTON ‐ Delegate Michael Thoreson BROCKTON ‐ Alternate Elaine Czaja DUXBURY Delegate Peter Buttkus EAST BRIDGEWATER ‐ Delegate John Haines EAST BRIDGEWATER ‐ Alternate Richard O’Flaherty EASTON ‐ Delegate David J. Field, P.E. EASTON ‐ Alternate Maurice Goulet HALIFAX Troy Garron HANSON Donald Howard KINGSTON Paul Basler PEMBROKE Eugene Fulmine PLYMOUTH Sid Kashi PLYMPTON Jim Mulcahy STOUGHTON Carin Klipp STOUGHTON Noreen O’Toole WEST BRIDGEWATER Leonard Graf III WHITMAN ‐ Delegate Daniel Salvucci AGENCY REPRESENTATION OCPC TRANSPORTATION STAFF MassDOT David Mohler Charles Kilmer, AICP Transportation Program Manager MassDOT Clinton Bench Jed Cornock Transportation Planner MassDOT Karen Pearson Josh Callahan Transportation Intern MassDOT District 5 Mary Jo Perry Raymond Guarino Transportation Planner MassDOT District 5 Pamela Haznar Susan McGrath GIS Coordinator MassDOT District 5 Tim Kochan William McNulty Transportation Planner BAT Reinald Ledoux, Jr. Kyle Mowatt Assistant Planner BAT Kathy Riddell Andrew Vidal Communications/GIS/IT Specialist DEP Leah Weiss FHWA Paul Maloney FHWA Pamela S. Stephenson FTA Mary Beth Mello FTA William Gordon FTA Noah Berger Brockton Traffic Captain Steven Williamson Commission ii | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan Old Colony Planning Council OCPC OFFICERS President Robert G. Moran Jr. Treasurer Lee Hartmann Secretary Fred Gilmetti COMMUNITY DELEGATE ALTERNATE ABINGTON Christopher Aiello David Klein AVON Frank Staffier Charles Marinelli BRIDGEWATER Anthony P. Anacki BROCKTON Robert G. Moran, Jr. Preston Huckabee DUXBURY Josh Cutler Thomas Broadrick EAST BRIDGEWATER Richard O’Flaherty EASTON Jeanmarie Kent‐Joyce Steve Donahue HALIFAX John G. Mather Troy E. Garron HANSON Robert Overholtzer Phillip Lindquist KINGSTON Dennis Randall PEMBROKE Gerard Dempsey Daniel Trabucco PLYMOUTH Lee Hartmann Valarie Massard PLYMPTON John Rantuccio James Mulcahy STOUGHTON Scott Turner Robert E. Kuver WEST BRIDGEWATER Eldon F. Moreira Nancy Bresciani WHITMAN Fred Gilmetti Daniel Salvucci OCPC STAFF Pasquale Ciaramella Executive Director Eric Arbeene Community Planner Lila Burgess Ombudsman Program Director Jed Cornock Transportation Planner Josh Callahan Transportation Intern Hazel Gauley Assistant Ombudsman Director Raymond Guarino Transportation Planner Patrick Hamilton AAA Administrator Bruce G. Hughes Economic Development/Community Planner Charles Kilmer Transportation Program Manager Jane E. Linhares Grants Monitor Janet McGinty Fiscal Officer Susan McGrath GIS Coordinator William McNulty Transportation Planner Kyle Mowatt Assistant Planner Anne Nicholas Ombudsman Program Assistant Rodrigo Marion Transportation Planner Norman Sorgman Assistant Ombudsman Director Andrew Vidal Communications/GIS/IT Specialist James R. Watson Comprehensive Planning Supervisor iii | P a g e S epte mb er 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Bottleneck Identification ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Public Outreach ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Previous Studies .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Previous Studies – Bridgewater .................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 2001 Bridgewater Town Wide Comprehensive Traffic Study and Management Plan ......... 9 2.1.2 2003 Town of Bridgewater Master Plan ............................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Lakeshore Center Development Environmental Impact Study ............................................. 9 2.1.4 Bridgewater Place Single Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) .......................................... 10 2.2 Previous Studies – Stoughton ..................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Route 138 Corridor Planning Study – CTPS July 2001 ......................................................... 11 2.2.2 Town of Stoughton Community Development Plan – MAPC 2004 .................................... 11 2.2.3 Stoughton Station Concept Plans ‐ 2010 ............................................................................ 11 2.2.4 Stoughton Square Origins and Destination Study OCPC 2011 ............................................ 13 3 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Existing Conditions ‐ Bridgewater ............................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Average Daily Traffic, Prevailing Speeds, and Heavy Vehicles ‐ Bridgewater ..................... 21 3.1.2 2012 Intersection Peak Hour Levels‐of‐Service (LOS) ‐ Bridgewater .................................. 23 3.1.3 Intersection Crash Experience ‐ Bridgewater ..................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Land Use and Zoning – Bridgewater ................................................................................... 26 3.1.5 Pavement Conditions ‐ Bridgewater ................................................................................... 27 3.1.6 Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations ‐ Bridgewater .................................................... 27 3.1.7 Environmental Issues ‐ Bridgewater ................................................................................... 29 3.2 Existing Conditions – Stoughton ................................................................................................. 31 3.2.1 Average Daily Traffic, Prevailing Speeds, and Heavy Vehicles ‐ Stoughton ........................ 34 3.2.2 2012 Intersection Peak Hour Levels‐of‐Service (LOS) ‐ Stoughton ..................................... 37 3.2.3 Intersection Crash Experience ‐ Stoughton ........................................................................ 38 3.2.4 Land Use and Zoning ‐ Stoughton ....................................................................................... 39 3.2.5 Transit and Commuter Options ‐ Stoughton ....................................................................... 39 3.2.6 Pavement Conditions ‐ Stoughton ...................................................................................... 40 3.2.7 Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations ‐ Stoughton ....................................................... 40 3.2.8 Environmental Issues – Stoughton ..................................................................................... 43 4 Future Conditions and Operations ...................................................................................................... 45 iv | P a g e S epte mb er 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan 4.1 Future Conditions and Operations ‐ Bridgewater ....................................................................... 45 4.1.1 No‐Build Conditions ‐ Bridgewater ..................................................................................... 45 4.1.2 Build Conditions ‐ Bridgewater ........................................................................................... 46 4.1.3 Future Intersection Peak Hour Levels‐of‐Service (LOS) ‐ Bridgewater ............................... 47 4.2 Future Conditions and Operations ‐ Stoughton .......................................................................... 49 4.2.1 No‐Build Conditions ‐ Stoughton ........................................................................................ 49 4.2.2 Build Conditions ‐ Stoughton .............................................................................................. 49 4.2.3 Future Intersection Peak Hour Levels‐of‐Service (LOS) ‐ Stoughton .................................. 51 5 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 53 5.1 Overall Short Term and Long Term Improvements .................................................................... 53 5.1.1 Access Management ........................................................................................................... 54 5.1.2 Bridgewater Route 104 Improvements .............................................................................. 54 5.1.3 Stoughton ‐ Route 138 Improvements ............................................................................... 59 5.2 Funding for Improvements ......................................................................................................... 65 6 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 68 v | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan 1 Introduction 1.1 Bottleneck Identification The Old Colony Planning Council (OCPC) established a Localized Bottleneck Reduction Improvement Program in 2010 to identify and target specific congestion chokepoint areas in the region’s roadway network. In addition to bottleneck identification, Phase I of the program focused on prioritizing the locations for further in‐depth study. The Old Colony FFY 2012 Unified Planning Work Program focuses on two bottleneck arterials: Route 104 in Bridgewater from South Street to the Raynham Town Line, and Route 138 in Stoughton from Brock Street to the Canton Town Line. The identification process in Phase I was data driven and included the utilization of local agency knowledge and direct observation.1 The Phase I identification process utilized the Old Colony Congestion Management Process (CMP), corridor studies, and other traffic studies completed by OCPC or other agencies and/or consultant engineers. A matrix was developed that included location, bottleneck type (recurring versus incident related), previous studies, and improvements to the facility (recently implemented or planned), as well as data driven performance measures including Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratio and levels‐of‐service (LOS). Public outreach included surveys in which stakeholders identified bottleneck priorities. Priorities were given to those locations that were not covered in recent studies and/or were not scheduled for improvement in the Old Colony Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The Federal Highway Administration defines bottlenecks as: “Localized sections of highway experiencing delay and restricted free movement at a point of congestion during the peak commuter periods”. Bottlenecks are categorized into two types: non‐recurring bottlenecks, which are random and happen at work zones, special events, crashes, and incidents, and recurring bottlenecks, which happen under fixed conditions and involve the design, or function of a facility. These occur at confluences or choke points where peak hour surging periodically overwhelms the roadway’s physical ability (i.e., capacity) to handle the traffic. Examples of recurring bottlenecks include ramps, lane drops, weaves, merges, grades, underpasses, tunnels, narrow lanes, lack of shoulders, bridge lane reduction, curves, and poorly operating traffic signals. This study includes analysis for recurring bottlenecks only. Bottleneck analyses were developed to meet the objectives of the 2012 Old Colony Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Figure 1 documents the connection between the bottleneck analysis, the objectives of the RTP, and the overall RTP goal for enhancing and protecting regional mobility. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the bottleneck study area locations in Bridgewater and Stoughton. 1 “An Agency Guide on How to Establish Localized Congestion Mitigation Programs”, FHWA’s Bottleneck Reduction Initiative Program Office of Operations, March 2011, page 2‐10. 1 | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan Figure 1 ‐ Relationship of the Bottleneck Study and the Old Colony Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 2 | P a g e S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan r e t a w e g d ri B ‐ a e r A y d u t S k c e n e tl t o B ‐ 2 e r u g Fi M R E A T H A N W Y A G R D RI B 3 | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2 Old Colony Major Bottleneck In‐Depth Analysis and Action Plan Figure 3 – Bottleneck Study Area ‐ Stoughton CANTON STOUGHTON 4 | P a g e Se ptem ber 2 0 1 2