Phonation Types in Marathi: An Acoustic Investigation By Copyright 2013 Kelly Harper Berkson Submitted to the graduate degree program in Linguistics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Co-Chair Dr. Jie Zhang ________________________________ Co-Chair Dr. Allard Jongman ________________________________ Dr. Joan Sereno ________________________________ Dr. Harold Torrence ________________________________ Dr. Raymond Pierotti ________________________________ Dr. Geetanjali Tiwari Date Defended: December 7, 2012 1 The Dissertation Committee for Kelly Harper Berkson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Phonation Types in Marathi: An Acoustic Investigation ________________________________ Co-Chair Dr. Jie Zhang ________________________________ Co-Chair Dr. Allard Jongman Date Approved: December 7, 2012 ii Abstract This dissertation presents a comprehensive instrumental acoustic analysis of phonation type distinctions in Marathi, an Indic language with numerous breathy voiced sonorants and obstruents. Important new facts about breathy voiced sonorants, which are crosslinguistically rare, are established: male and female speakers cue breathy phonation in sonorants differently, there are an abundance of trading relations, and—critically—phonation type distinctions are not cued as well by sonorants as by obstruents. Ten native speakers (five male, five female) were recorded producing Marathi words embedded in a carrier sentence. Tokens included plain and breathy voiced stops, affricates, nasals, laterals, rhotics, and approximants before the vowels [a] and [e]. Measures reported for consonants and subsequent vowels include duration, F0, Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP), and corrected H1-H2*, H1-A1*, H1-A2*, and H1-A3* values. As expected, breathy voice is associated with decreased CPP and increased spectral values. A strong gender difference is revealed: low-frequency measures like H1-H2* cue breathy phonation more reliably in male speech, while CPP—which provides information about the aspiration noise included in the signal—is a more reliable cue in female speech. Trading relations are also reported: time and again, where one cue is weak or absent another cue is strong or present, underscoring the importance of including both genders and multiple vowel contexts when testing phonation type differences. Overall, the cues that are present for obstruents are not necessarily mirrored by sonorants. These findings are interpreted with reference to Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995; Liljencrants & Lindblom 1972; Lindblom 1986, 1990). While various incarnations of Dispersion Theory focus on different aspects of perceptual and auditory distinctiveness, a basic claim is that iii one requirement for phonological contrasts is that they must be perceptually distinct: contrasts that are subject to great confusability are phonologically disfavored. The proposal, then, is that the typology of breathy voiced sonorants is due in part to the fact that they are not well differentiated acoustically. Breathy voiced sonorants are crosslinguistically rare because they do not make for strong phonemic contrasts. iv Acknowledgements My first thank you goes to the Marathi consultants who were generous with their time, energy, input, and good humor. Anything I learned I owe to them, and I am thankful beyond measure. Special thanks to Namrata Barve and Priyanka Raut, without whom I never would have started working with Marathi. Thank you also to Abhijeet Barve, Narayani Barve, Vijay Barve, and Priyamvada Prabhu. I am immensely grateful to my co-advisors, Dr. Allard Jongman and Dr. Jie Zhang, for the myriad ways in which they supported me during the writing of this dissertation. Their critiques, commentary, and genuine enthusiasm for the project kept me engaged and carried me forward when my own energy flagged. I owe you both a debt that goes beyond words, and I can only hope that I am able to pay it forward. Thank you also to my other committee members—Dr. Raymond Pierotti, Dr. Joan Sereno, Dr. Geetanjali Tiwari, and Dr. Harold Torrence—who asked me questions that made me think harder and produce better work. Throughout this process I felt challenged in all the best ways and supported in all the most important ways. It was a true honor and privilege to work with you all, and I only wish that every graduate student could be graced with such a committee. My colleagues in the Linguistics Department—Rania Agarbeh, I Nyoman Aryawibawa, José Alemán Bañón, Turki Binturki, Kristi Bond, Philip Duncan, Hiba Gharib, Pedro Mateo, Mircea Sauciuc, Khady Tamba, and Mahire Yakup—were with me from the beginning. They, along with Dr. Alison Gabriele and Dr. Sara Rosen, offered critical support along the way. My classmates and colleagues in LING 850 provided important insights as I wrestled with data and with presentations. I am particularly grateful to Goun Lee, Hyunjung Lee, Maite Martínez- García, and Mahire Yakup. Stephen Politzer-Ahles deserves special mention, as well, for v technical support, coding assistance, and general awesomeness. Thank you, all, for unending patience and support. It should also be said that a dissertation is both a solo and a group endeavor: although I wrote this document, and am solely responsible for any errors, it would not exist without the love and support I received from my friends and family during its creation. Abigail Berkson, Diane Helen Harper, H. Neil Berkson, Heather Bandalo, Ilene Lang, William G. Johnson, my beloved aunts and uncles, and my Art of Living and Lawrence families: thank you, on so many levels. Finally, I am also grateful to the Marathi language for being my constant companion over these last years. Ashok Kelkar wrote the following dedication in his 1958 dissertation on Marathi: I could never say it better. “To The Marathi language It was a pleasure to work with you, although I must confess that your messiness sometimes infuriated me. There never was, however, a dull moment!” As always: all that is well done benefitted from the help of those I have mentioned. Any mistakes are mine alone. vi Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of the present study ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 Major themes that emerge in the present study ............................................................. 6 1.3 Significance of the present work .................................................................................... 8 1.4 Overview of the dissertation .......................................................................................... 8 2 Setting the stage: Background information and previous research ..................................... 10 2.1 An overview of sonorants and obstruents .................................................................... 10 2.2 An overview of phonation types .................................................................................. 12 2.3 Breathy voice in Indic and beyond: A review of previous findings ............................ 14 2.4 Duration ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.1 Consonant Duration .................................................................................................. 22 2.4.2 Post-release measures: VOT, NOT, ACT, and the PVI ............................................ 24 2.4.3 Vowel Duration ......................................................................................................... 35 2.5 Fundamental Frequency ............................................................................................... 36 2.6 Spectral Measures ........................................................................................................ 38 2.6.1 H1-H2 ....................................................................................................................... 43 2.6.2 H1-A1, H1-A2, H1-A3 ............................................................................................. 46 2.6.2.1 H1-A1 .................................................................................................................... 47 2.6.2.2 H1-A2 .................................................................................................................... 49 2.6.2.3 H1-A3 .................................................................................................................... 51 2.7 Cepstral Peak Prominence ........................................................................................... 52 2.8 Broad review ................................................................................................................ 56 2.9 An overview of Marathi ............................................................................................... 58 3 Overview of the Present Study – Methods and Procedures ................................................ 62 3.1 Participants ................................................................................................................... 62 3.2 Materials ...................................................................................................................... 63 3.3 Recording and token presentation ................................................................................ 66 3.4 Data analysis ................................................................................................................ 67 3.5 Intervals measured ....................................................................................................... 69 3.6 Predictions .................................................................................................................... 69 3.7 Statistical analyses ....................................................................................................... 71 4 Duration Results .................................................................................................................. 73 4.1 Consonant Duration ..................................................................................................... 75 4.2 Pre-Vocalic Interval ..................................................................................................... 81 4.3 Vowel Duration ............................................................................................................ 85 4.4 A brief recap of duration results .................................................................................. 88 5 Fundamental Frequency Results ......................................................................................... 90 5.1 Fundamental frequency in voiced consonants ............................................................. 91 5.2 Fundamental frequency in vowels ............................................................................... 96 5.3 F0 recap ...................................................................................................................... 105 6 Spectral Measure Results .................................................................................................. 107 6.1 H1-H2c Results .......................................................................................................... 107 6.1.1 H1-H2c – consonant results .................................................................................... 108 6.1.2 H1-H2c – vowel results .......................................................................................... 115 vii 6.1.3 H1-H2c recap .......................................................................................................... 125 6.2 H1-A1c ....................................................................................................................... 127 6.2.1 H1-A1c – consonant results .................................................................................... 128 6.2.2 H1-A1c – vowel results .......................................................................................... 134 6.2.3 H1-A1c recap .......................................................................................................... 145 6.3 H1-A2c ....................................................................................................................... 147 6.3.1 H1-A2c – consonant results .................................................................................... 148 6.3.2 H1-A2c – vowel results .......................................................................................... 153 6.3.3 H1-A2c recap .......................................................................................................... 161 6.4 H1-A3c ....................................................................................................................... 163 6.4.1 H1-A3c – consonant results .................................................................................... 164 6.4.2 H1-A3c – vowel results .......................................................................................... 169 6.4.3 H1-A3c recap .......................................................................................................... 175 6.5 Cepstral Peak Prominence ......................................................................................... 177 6.5.1 CPP – consonant results .......................................................................................... 178 6.5.2 CPP – vowel results ................................................................................................ 187 6.5.3 CPP recap ................................................................................................................ 194 7 An overview of all results ................................................................................................. 196 8 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 200 8.1 The present results in relation to previous findings ................................................... 202 8.2 Trading relations ........................................................................................................ 204 8.3 Gender differences ..................................................................................................... 213 8.4 Sonorants and obstruents ........................................................................................... 225 9 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 234 References ............................................................................................................................... 237 Appendix A – Demographic Data ........................................................................................... 244 Appendix B – Wordlist ........................................................................................................... 246 viii List of Figures Figure 1 The Glottal Continuum ........................................................................................ 16 Figure 2 Illustration of breathy voiced obstruent: waveform and spectrogram of the word [bʱat], ‘rice’ .......................................................................................................... 18 Figure 3 Sample waveforms of four stop-types in Marathi ................................................ 20 Figure 4 Illustration of NOT beginning and endpoints in [khas], ‘special’ ........................ 27 Figure 5 Measurement of ACT in [pʰaʈa], ‘fork (in the road)’ .......................................... 28 Figure 6 Clear ACT, missing ACT: two waveforms of the [bʱ] in [bʱat], ‘rice’ ................ 31 Figure 7 Waveform and spectrogram of [bʱat], ‘rice’ ........................................................ 32 Figure 8 Waveform and spectrograms of modal and breathy voiced stops ....................... 40 Figure 9 Illustration of H1, H2, A1, A2, and A3 on spectra generated from the modal and breathy voice sources shown in Figure 8 ............................................................. 41 Figure 10 Illustration of CPP measures from modal and breathy voiced tokens ................. 54 Figure 11 Marathi consonant chart ....................................................................................... 59 Figure 12 Marathi consonants recorded in the present study ............................................... 63 Figure 13 Full syllable duration (consonant, PVI, vowel) by phonation type, obstruency, and voicing .................................................................................................................. 74 Figure 14 Consonant duration by obstruency, voice, and phonation type ........................... 77 Figure 15 Duration of sonorants and voiced obstruents in word-initial position ................. 79 Figure 16 Medial consonant durations by obstruency, voice, phonation type, and place of articulation ........................................................................................................... 80 Figure 17 PVI durations by obstruency, voice, breath, and place of articulation ................ 82 Figure 18 PVI durations by obstruency, voice, breath, and vowel context .......................... 84 Figure 19 Time course of F0 (in Hz) in voiced consonants ................................................. 92 Figure 20 Time course of F0 across voiced consonants by vowel context – male data ....... 94 Figure 21 Time course of F0 across voiced consonants by word position ........................... 95 Figure 22 Time course of F0 across vowels after voiced consonants by obstruency and phonation type ...................................................................................................... 98 Figure 23 Time course of F0 across vowels after obstruents by voice (post hoc) ............... 99 Figure 24 Time course of F0 across [a] and [e] (post hoc) ................................................ 102 Figure 25 Time course of F0 across vowels by word position (post hoc) .......................... 104 Figure 26 Time course of H1-H2c across sonorants by phonation type and gender .......... 109 Figure 27 Time course of H1-H2c across sonorants by breath, place, and gender ............ 111 Figure 28 Time course of H1-H2c across sonorants by phonation type and word position113 Figure 29 H1-H2c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 115 Figure 30 H1-H2c across vowels after voiced segments by phonation type and obstruency116 Figure 31 H1-H2c across vowels after obstruents by voice – male data ........................... 118 Figure 32 H1-H2c across [a] and [e] by phonation type and obstruency ........................... 121 Figure 33 H1-H2c across vowels after voiced segments by phonation type, obstruency, and word position ..................................................................................................... 124 Figure 34 H1-A1c values across sonorants by gender ....................................................... 129 Figure 35 H1-A1c of sonorants by phonation type and place of articulation .................... 130 Figure 36 H1-A1c values across sonorants by breath, vowel context, and gender ............ 132 Figure 37 H1-A1c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 134 Figure 38 H1-A1c in vowels after obstruents by phonation type and voice ...................... 135 Figure 39 H1-A1c in vowels after voiced consonants by obstruency and breath .............. 137 ix Figure 40 H1-A1c in vowels after voiced consonants by phonation type and obstruency – female data, with error bars ............................................................................... 138 Figure 41 H1-A1c in [a] and [e] after voiced consonants by phonation type, obstruency, and gender ................................................................................................................. 141 Figure 42 H1- A1c after voiced consonants by breath, obstruency, and word position .... 143 Figure 43 H1-A2c across sonorants by consonant phonation type and gender .................. 149 Figure 44 H1-A2c across sonorants by consonant phonation type and vowel context ...... 151 Figure 45 H1-A2c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 152 Figure 46 H1-A2c across vowels after obstruents by consonant phonation type and voice154 Figure 47 H1-A2c across vowels after voiced segments by consonant phonation type and obstruency .......................................................................................................... 155 Figure 48 H1-A2c across [a] and [e] following voiced segments by consonant phonation type and gender .......................................................................................................... 157 Figure 49 H1-A2c values across vowels following voiced segments by consonant phonation type, word position, and gender ......................................................................... 158 Figure 50 H1-A3c across sonorants by phonation type and gender ................................... 165 Figure 51 H1-A3c values across sonorants by phonation type, place of articulation, and vowel context ................................................................................................................ 166 Figure 52 H1-A3c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 169 Figure 53 H1-A3c across vowels after obstruents by consonant phonation type and voice170 Figure 54 H1-A3c across vowels after voiced segments by consonant phonation type and obstruency .......................................................................................................... 172 Figure 55 H1-A3c values in vowels after voiced segments by consonant phonation type and word position ..................................................................................................... 173 Figure 56 H1-A3c in vowels after voiced segments by consonant phonation type, vowel context, and gender ............................................................................................ 174 Figure 57 Time course of CPP across voiced segments by phonation type and obstruency178 Figure 58 Time course of CPP across voiced obstruents ................................................... 180 Figure 59 Time course of CPP across sonorants by phonation type and gender ............... 181 Figure 60 CPP across sonorants ~ vowel context and word position (female data) .......... 183 Figure 61 CPP across sonorants by phonation type and place of articulation (female data)185 Figure 62 CPP across full syllables by obstruency ............................................................ 187 Figure 63 CPP in vowels after obstruents by breath, voice, and gender ............................ 188 Figure 64 CPP in vowels after voiced consonants by breath, obstruency, and gender ...... 190 Figure 65 CPP across vowels after voiced consonants ~ vowel contexts .......................... 191 Figure 66 CPP across vowels after voiced consonants ~ word positions .......................... 193 Figure 67 F0 across syllables by gender, phonation type, and obstruency ........................ 216 Figure 68 H1-H2c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 217 Figure 69 H1-A1c across syllables by gender (sonorant data only) ................................... 218 Figure 70 CPP across syllables by gender and obstruency ................................................ 219 x
Description: