ebook img

08.12.2015 MEDIATION CAUSE LIST PDF

280 Pages·2015·1.83 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview 08.12.2015 MEDIATION CAUSE LIST

08.12.2015 SUPPLEMENTARY LIST SUPPLEMENTARY LIST FOR TODAY IN CONTINUATION OF THE ADVANCE LIST ALREADY CIRCULATED. THE WEBSITE OF DELHI HIGH COURT IS www.delhihighcourt.nic.in' INDEX PRONOUNCEMNT OF JUDGMENTS ------------> J- 1 TO 4 REGULAR MATTERS ----------------------> R- 1 TO 100 FINAL MATTERS (ORIGINAL SIDE) ---------> F- 1 TO 18 ADVANCE LIST --------------------------> 1 TO 96 APPELLATE SIDE (SUPPLEMENTARY LIST)----> 97 TO 111 (FIRST PART) APPELLATE SIDE (SUPPLEMENTARY LIST)----> 112 TO 119 (SECOND PART) COMPANY -------------------------------> 120 TO 124 ORIGINAL SIDE (SUPPLEMENTARY I)--------> 125 TO 133 SECOND SUPPLEMENTARY ------------------> 134 TO MEDIATION CAUSE LIST ---------> 01 TO 5 NOTES 1. Urgent mentioning may be made before Hon'ble DB-II at 10.30 A.M. 2. As directed by Hon'ble DB-III, RFA(OS)92/2012 and RFA(OS)103/2012 are listed before the same Bench in the category of Directions at item Nos. 16 and 17. 3. Hon'ble DB-V will not assemble today. Dates will be given by the Court Master. DELETIONS 1. W.P.(C) 6788/2014 listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw at item No. 32 is deleted as the same is fixed for 28.01.2016. 2. W.P.(C) 11387/2015 listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw at item No. 63 is deleted as the same is listed before Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.P. Vaish. 3. Crl.M.C. 3303/2013 listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Teji at item No. 24 is deleted as the same is fixed for 18.12.2015. No.749/Listing/DHC Dated 28.11.2015 CIRCULAR Re: Separate filing code for cases pertaining to differently abled persons. It is hereby circulated for information of all concerned that a separate filing code “5300” has been assigned for cases pertaining to differently abled persons. The advocates/litigants are required to file such cases under the assigned code alongwith a certificate issued by a Government Hospital/Medical Board in support of the disablility at the time of filing of such cases. For cases pending adjudication in this Court, advocates/litigants are requested to submit a list of their respective cases falling under code No.5300(Differently-abled person) clearly indicating the case number alongwith a certificate issued by a Government Hospital/Medical Board in support of the disability of his/her client/litigant to the Joint Registrar/Deputy Registrar of the concerned Judicial Branch. No. 27309/I/Orgl./DHC Dated: 27.11.2015 PRACTICE DIRECTION Hon’ble the Chief Justice, on the recommendations of the Hon’ble Judge In-Charge (Original Side) has been pleased to direct that Summons for settlement of Issues in a Suit relating to Commercial Dispute shall be issued as per proforma given below:- “Summons for Settlement of Issues in a Suit Relating to Commercial Dispute (U/s 6 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Ordinance, 2015 amending Order V, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) In the Court of ......................................of...........................Plaintiff Against ......................................of..........................Defendant. To (Name, description and place of residence) Whereas..................has instituted a suit relating to a commercial dispute against you and you are hereby summoned to file a written statement within 30 days of the service of the present summons and in case you fail to file the written statement within the said period of 30 days, you shall be allowed to file the written statement on such other day, as may be specified by the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing and on payment of such costs as the Court deems fit, but which shall not be later than 120 days from the date of service of summons. On expiry of one hundred and twenty days from the date of service of summons, you shall forfeit the right to file the written statement and the Court shall not allow the written statement to be taken on record. You are required to appear in this Court in person, or by a pleader duly instructed, and able to answer all material questions relating to suit, or who shall be accompanied by some person able to answer all such questions, on the ..............day of....................at ..............O’ clock in the ............................. noon, to answer the claim; and further you are hereby to produce on the said day all documents in your possession or power upon which you base your defence or claim for set-off or counter-claim, and where you rely on any other document whether in your possession or power or not, as evidence in support or you defence or claim for set-off, or counter-claim you shall enter such documents in a list to be annexed to the written statement. Take notice that, in default of your appearance on the day before mentioned, the suit will be heard and determined in your absence. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this ............................ day of......................20................ Judge” By Order sd/ REGISTRAR GENERAL OFFICE ORDER Notification No.27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015 – In exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), which came into force with effect from 26.10.2015 vide Notification No. F.No.L-19015/04/2012-Jus dated 26.10.2015 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, published in Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3 sub-section (ii), Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order as under:- 1. All suits or other proceedings pending in the Delhi High Court on the Original Side up to the value of rupees one crore, excepting those cases in which final judgments have been reserved, be transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate courts. 2. All suits or other proceedings the value of which exceeds rupees one crore but does not exceed rupees two crores, other than those relating to commercial disputes the specified value of which is not less than rupees one crore (as defined in The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Ordinance, 2015), pending in the Delhi High Court on the Original Side, excepting those cases in which final judgments have been reserved, be transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate courts. The transfer of cases to the subordinate courts shall commence from today, i.e. 24.11.2015 sd/ Registrar General 24.11.2015 NOTICE Pursuant to the promulgation of Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Ordinance, 2015, Hon’ble the Chief Justice, by orders dated 15.11.2015 and 17.11.2015, has been pleased to constitute “Commercial Division” and “Commercial Appellate Division” of the High Court in terms of Section 4(1) & Section 5(1) of the Ordinance respectively. “Commercial Division” consists of six benches of a Single Judge each. Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh; Hon’ble Mr. Justice J. R. Midha; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Valmiki J. Mehta; Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. K. Pathak; and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri have been nominated to be the Judges of the “Commercial Division”. “Commercial Appellate Division” has been constituted with four Division Benches, namely, DB-I, DB-II, DB-III and DB-IV. The Hon’ble Judges who are members of the said four Division Benches as per the present roster, namely, Hon’ble the Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath (DB-I); Hon’ble Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva (DB-II); Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta (DB-III) and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Gita Mittal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice I.S. Mehta (DB-IV), have been nominated to be the Judges of the “Commercial Appellate Division”. ********* Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to pass the th following orders dated 6 November, 2015 for information:- “1. With effect from 26th October, 2015, suits/applications, the jurisdictional value of which does not exceed rupees two crores, shall be presented to the District Judge of the concerned district and the suits/applications, the jurisdictional value of which exceeds rupees two crores, shall be presented in the High Court. 2. In terms of the provisions of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High rd Courts Ordinance, 2015 (No.8 of 2015), w.e.f. 23 October, 2015 all suits/applications relating to commercial disputes, the specified value of which is not less than one crore rupees, shall be presented in the High Court to be heard and disposed of by the Commercial Division.” REGISTRAR(LISTING) 08.12.2015 J-1 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS (APPLT. JURISDICTION) 08.12.2015 COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH AT 10.30 A.M 1. W.P.(C) 3573/2014 AMRAPALI BASUMATARY & ANR. SANJEEV KUMAR DUBEY CM APPL. 7291/2014 VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. RAJMANGAL KUMAR UDIT MALIK, HASHMAT NABI SAROJ BIDAWAT, SANTOSH KUMAR 2. LPA 190/2015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI CM APPL. 6083/2015 THR SECRETARY CM APPL. 6084/2015 VS. POONAM GUPTA CM APPL. 6086/2015 3. LPA 191/2015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI CM APPL. 6096/2015 THR SECRETARY (LAND & CM APPL. 6097/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT) CM APPL. 6099/2015 VS. SUNDER PAL 4. LPA 193/2015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI CM APPL. 6108/2015 THR SECRETARY CM APPL. 6109/2015 (LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT) CM APPL. 6111/2015 VS. SURENDER SINGH 5. LPA 195/2015 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI CM APPL. 6127/2015 THR SECRETARY CM APPL. 6128/2015 (LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT) CM APPL. 6130/2015 VS. AJIT SINGH COUNCEL FOR THE APPELLANT: - MR. SANJAY PODDAR, SR. ADVCATE WITH MR. YEESHU JAIN AND MS. JYOTI TYAGI, ADVOCATES FOR THE APPELLANTS. COUNCEL FOR THE RESPONDENT:- MR. VINEET MEHTA AND MR. ANKUR GUPTA, ADVOCATES IN LPA 190/2015. MR. N.S. DALAL AND MR. DAVESH, ADVOCATES IN LPA NO. 191/2015. MR. B.S. MAAN, MR. VISHAL MAAN, MRS. SMITRA MAAN AND MR. PARITOSH TOMAR, ADVOCATES IN LPA NO. 193/2015 & LPA NO. 195/2015. 08.12.2015 J-2 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS (APPLT. JURISDICTION) COURT NO.3 (DIVISION BENCH-3) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1. LPA 610-11/2006 RAM NIWAS GUPTA & ANR. NEERAJ YADAV, ARTI BANSAL VS. MCD BIJI RAJESH, GAURANG KANTH COURT NO.33 (DIVISION BENCH-6) EXTENSION BLOCK (SECOND FLOOR) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA AT 2.15 P.M 1. CRL.A 203/2000 RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA SUMER KUMAR SETHI, DOLLY SHARMA VS. STATE AASHA TIWARI 2. CRL.L.P 665/2015 THE STATE AASHAA TIWARI VS. ARIF COURT NO. 7 (DIVISION BENCH-8) HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU AT 10.30 A.M 1. ITA 163/2002 HONEY ENTERPRISES SHASHI M. KAPILA, PRAVESH SHARMA VS. COMMISSIONER OF SURUCHI AGGARWAL, LAKSHMI GURUNG INCOME TAX, DELHI ABHISHEK SHARMA 2. ITA 377/2004 M/S HONEY ENTERPRISES SHASHI M. KAPILA, PRAVESH SHARMA VS. COMMISSIONER OF SURUCHI AGGARWAL, LAKSHMI GURUNG INCOME TAX, DELHI ABHISHEK SHARMA 3. ITA 260/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME SURUCHI AGGARWAL, LAKSHMI GURUNG TAX ABHISHEK SHARMA, SHASHI M. KAPILA VS. HONEY ENTERPRISES PRAVESH SHARMA, 08.12.2015 J-3 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS (APPLT. JURISDICTION) 4. ITA 537/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SURUCHI AGGARWAL, LAKSHMI GURUNG VS. HONEY ENTERPRISES ABHISHEK SHARMA, SHASHI M. KAPILA PRAVESH SHARMA, 5. ITA 20/2003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN DELHI PRAKASH KUMAR VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA 6. ITA 21/2003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN DELHI PRAKASH KUMAR VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA 7. ITA 24/2003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN DELHI PRAKASH KUMAR VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA 8. WTA 3/2003 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA PRAKASH KUMAR 9. WTA 4/2003 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX,DELHI ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA PRAKASH KUMAR 10. WTA 5/2003 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA PRAKASH KUMAR 11. WTA 6/2003 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, ROHIT MADAN, ZOHEB HOSSAIN VS. SUMAN DHAMIJA PRAKASH KUMAR COURT NO. 30 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR 1. CRL.A 1074/2013 SANJAY PRASAD JIVESH KUMAR TIWARI VS. STATE (GOVT OF NCT) TARANG SRIVASTAVA OF DELHI COURT NO. 32 EXTENSION BLOCK (FIRST FLOOR) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG AT 2.15 P.M 1. CRL.A 314/2015 STATE AMIT GUPTA, RITESH KHARE VS. BRIJ DEV TIWARI SUMIT R. SHARMA @ PANDIT 08.12.2015 J-4 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS (APPLT. JURISDICTION) COURT NO. 15 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA AT THE END OF BOARD 1. W.P.(C) 8148/2007 SRI OM DEV P. BHARDWAJ, ANUBHA BHARDWAJ VS. THE MANGT. OF RAJPAL SINGH, SANDEEP SINGH KUMAR CHHOTU RAM EDUCATIONAL TRUST THR. ITS SECRETARY HIGH COURT OF DELHI REGISTRAR (LISTING) 07.12.2015

Description:
HEMANT SINGH,SADHNA. CM APPL. 11588/2005. Vs. MADAN WALIA. SHARMA,SACHIN GUPTA,ANJU. CM APPL. 502/2006. AGRAWAL. 6. RFA 258/2007. SURINDER PRAKASH GUPTA. NEERAJ GROVER,MOHAN. CM APPL. 6621/2007. Vs. ARORA ASSOCIATES. VIDHANI,SAZID. 7. EFA(OS) 5/
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.