University of Groningen Technē/Technology van den Oever, Annie IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Final author's version (accepted by publisher, after peer review) Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van den Oever, A. (Ed.) (2014). Technē/Technology: Researching Cinema and Media Technologies - Their Development, Use, and Impact. (1 ed.) (The Key Debates; Vol. 4). Amsterdam University Press. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 17-03-2023 ē Techn /Technology TheKeyDebates MutationsandAppropriations inEuropeanFilmStudies SeriesEditors IanChristie,DominiqueChateau,AnnievandenOever AcademicAdvisoryBoard FrancescoCasetti LaurentCreton JaneGaines FrankKessler AndrásBálintKovács EricdeKuyper LauraMulvey RogerOdin PatriciaPisters EmilePoppe PertSalabert HeideSchlupmann VivianSobchack JanetStaiger ē Techn /Technology Researching Cinema and Media – Technologies Their Development, Use, and Impact Edited by Annie van den Oever AmsterdamUniversityPress The publication of this book is made possible by grants from the Netherlands OrganisationforScientificResearch(NWO). This book is published in print and online through the online OAPEN library (www.oapen.org) OAPEN(OpenAccessPublishinginEuropeanNetworks)isacollaborativeinitia- tive to develop and implement a sustainable Open Access publication model for academicbooksintheHumanitiesandSocialSciences.TheOAPENLibraryaims toimprovethevisibilityandusabilityofhighqualityacademicresearchbyaggre- gatingpeerreviewedOpenAccesspublicationsfromacrossEurope. Cover illustration: Photo by Johan Stadtman. Courtesy of the Film Archive, Uni- versityofGroningen Coverdesign:Neon,designandcommunications|SabineMannel Lay-out:japes,Amsterdam AmsterdamUniversityPressEnglish-languagetitlesaredistributedintheUSand CanadabytheUniversityofChicagoPress. isbn 9789089645715 e-isbn 9789048519903(pdf) e-isbn 9789048519910(ePub) nur 670 CreativeCommonsLicenseCCBYNCND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) c A.M.A.vandenOever/AmsterdamUniversityPress,Amsterdam2014 Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, me- chanical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise). Every effort has been made to obtain permission to use all copyrighted illustra- tionsreproducedinthisbook.Nonetheless,whosoeverbelievestohaverightsto thismaterialisadvisedtocontactthepublisher. Contents Editorial 9 Acknowledgments 11 Introduction:ResearchingCinemaandMediaTechnologies 15 AnnievandenOever PARTI PhilosophyofTechnology:Reassessing KeyQuestions ThePhilosophyofTechnologyintheFrameofFilmTheory:Walter Benjamin’sContribution 29 DominiqueChateau TowardanArchaeologyoftheCinema/TechnologyRelation:From Mechanizationto“DigitalCinema” 50 BenoîtTurquety TechnēandPoiēsis:OnHeideggerandFilmTheory 65 RobertSinnerbrink Stiegler’sPost-PhenomenologicalAccountofMediatedExperience 81 PatrickCrogan WhatAreMedia? 93 LambertWiesing PARTII CinemaandMediaTechnologies:Hardware, Software,Wetware The“HistoryofVision”-DebateRevisited 105 AnnemoneLigensa Willthe3DRevolutionHappen?ABriefPerspectiveontheLong HistoryofStereoscopy(withspecialthankstoEisensteinand Bazin) 115 IanChristie 5 Television’sManyTechnologies:Domesticity,Governmentality, Genealogy 136 MarkusStauff PostmodernHi-fivs.Post-CoolLo-fi:AnEpistemologicalWar 154 LaurentJullier PARTIII CinemaandMediaTechnologies:A HistoricalContext Marey’sGun:ApparatusesofCaptureandtheOperationalImage 169 PasiVäliaho Re-editingasPsychotechnique:MontageandMedialityinEarlySoviet Cinema 177 MalteHagener TechnophobiaandItalianFilmTheoryintheInterwarPeriod 185 FrancescoPitassio Jean-LucGodard’sHISTOIRE(S)DUCINÉMA:CogitoErgoVideo 196 CélineScemama Performativity/Expressivity:TheMobileMicroScreenandIts Subject 207 NannaVerhoeffandHeidiRaeCooley PARTIV Discussions:RevisitingthePast RethinkingtheMaterialityofTechnicalMedia:FriedrichKittler, EnfantTerriblewithaRejuvenatingEffectonParentalDiscipline– ADialogue 219 GeoffreyWinthrop-YoungandAnnievandenOever RevisitingChristianMetz’s“ApparatusTheory”–ADialogue 240 MartinLefebvreandAnnievandenOever PARTV Envisioningthe Future TheFutureHistoryofaVanishingMedium 261 AndréGaudreault ExperimentalMediaArchaeology:APleaforNewDirections 272 AndreasFickersandAnnievandenOever 6 indexof subjects Notes 279 GeneralBibliography 333 NotesonContributors 361 IndexofNames 367 IndexofFilmTitles 375 IndexofSubjects 377 contents 7 Editorial Thinkingandtheorizingaboutfilmisalmostasoldasthemediumitself.Within a few years of the earliest film shows in the 1890s, manifestos and reflections began to appear which sought to analyze the seemingly vast potential of film. Writers in France, Russia and Britain were among the first to enter this field, and their texts have become cornerstones of the literature of cinema. Few na- tions, however, failed to produce their own statements and dialogues about the nature of cinema, often interacting with proponents of Modernism in the tradi- tionalartsandcrafts.Filmthus founditselfembeddedin thediscourses ofmo- dernity,especiallyinEuropeandSovietRussia. “Film theory,” as it became known in the 1970s, has always had a historical dimension, acknowledging its debts to the pioneers of analyzing film texts and film experience, even while pressing these into service in the present. But as scholarship in the history of film theory develops, there is an urgent need to revisit many long-standing assumptions and clarify lines of transmission and interpretation. The Key Debates is a series of books from Amsterdam University Press which focuses on the central issues that continue to animate thinking aboutfilmandaudiovisualmediaasthe“centuryofcelluloid”giveswaytoafield ofinterrelateddigitalmedia. InitiatedbyAnnievandenOever(theNetherlands),thedirectionoftheseries hasbeenelaboratedbyaninternationalgroupoffilmscholars,includingDomin- iqueChateau(France),IanChristie(UK),LaurentCreton(France),LauraMulvey (UK), Roger Odin (France), Eric de Kuyper (Belgium), and Emile Poppe (Bel- gium).Theintentionistodrawonthewidestpossiblerangeofexpertisetopro- vide authoritative accounts of how debates around film originated, and to trace how concepts that are commonly used today have been modified in the process ofappropriation.Thebookseriesmaycontributetoboththeinventionaswellas theabductionofconcepts. IanChristie,DominiqueChateau,AnnievandenOever London/Paris/Amsterdam 9
Description: