ebook img

Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities. Safety and Engineering Design PDF

346 Pages·1979·12.93 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities. Safety and Engineering Design

1 0 0 w 6.f 9 0 0 9- 7 9 1 k- b 1/ 2 0 1 0. 1 Toxic Chemical and Explosives oi: d 9 | 7 9 Facilities 1 6, pril A e: at D n o ati c bli u P In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. 1 0 0 w 6.f 9 0 0 9- 7 9 1 k- b 1/ 2 0 1 0. 1 oi: d 9 | 7 9 1 6, pril A e: at D n o ati c bli u P In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities Safety and Engineering Design Ralph A.Scott, Jr., EDITOR Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board 1 0 0 w 6.f 9 0 0 9- 7 9 1 k- b 1/ 02 Based on a symposium sponsored 1 0. 1 oi: by the Division of Chemical d 9 | 7 9 1 Health and Safety at the 176th 6, pril A Meeting of the American e: at D on Chemical Society, Miami Beach, ati c bli u Florida, September 11-13, 1978. P 96 ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY WASHINGTON, D.C. 1979 In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. Library of Congress CIP Data 1 0 0 Toxic chemical and explosives facilities. w 6.f (ACS symposium series; 96 ISSN 0087-6156) 09 Includes bibliographies and index. 0 9- 1. Explosives—Safety measures—Congresses. 2. 7 9 Chemicals—Safety measures—Congresses. 1 k- I. Scott, Ralph A., 1930- . II. American Chemical 1/b Society. Division of Chemical Health and Safety. III. 2 Series: American Chemical Society. ACS symposium 0 1 series; 96. 0. oi: 1 TISPB2N95 0.T-8649 12-0481-0 614A.8S'C3M2 C 8 96 17-9 -395726 01 979 d 9 | 7 9 1 6, pril Copyright © 1979 A e: American Chemical Society at D n All Rights Reserved. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of each catio athrtei calert iicnle thmisa yv obleu mmea dien dfiocart epse rsthonea clo opry riingthetr noawl nuesre's o cro fnosern tth eth paetr sroenparlo gorra pinhtiec rncoalp iuess eo fo f bli specific clients. This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the Pu stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to copying or transmission by any means—graphic or electronic—for any other purpose, such as for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, for resale, or for information storage and retrieval systems. The citation of trade names and/orn ames of manufacturers in this publication is not to be construed as an endorsement or as approval by ACS of the commercial products or services referenced herein; nor should the mere reference herein to any drawing, specification, chemical process, or other data be regarded as a license or as a conveyance of any right or permission, to the holder, reader, or any other person or corporation, to manufacture, repro duce, use, or sell any patented invention or copyrighted work that may in any way be related thereto. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA American Chemical Society Library 1155 16th St. N. W. Washington D. C. 20036 In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. ACS Symposium Series Robert F. Gould, Editor 1 0 0 w 6.f 9 0 0 9- 97 Advisory Board 1 k- b 21/ Kenneth B. Bischoff James P. Lodge 0 1 0. oi: 1 Donald G. Crosby John L. Margrave d 9 | Robert E. Feeney Leon Petrakis 7 9 1 pril 6, Jeremiah P. Freeman F. Sherwood Rowland A e: E. Desmond Goddard Alan C. Sartorelli at D on Jack Halpern Raymond B. Seymour ati c bli Robert A. Hofstader Aaron Wold u P James D. Idol, Jr. Gunter Zweig In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. 1 0 0 w 6.f FOREWORD 9 0 0 9- 7 9 The ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES was founded in 1974 to provide 1 k- a medium for publishing symposia quickly in book form. The b 21/ format of the Series parallels that of the continuing ADVANCES 0 0.1 IN CHEMISTRY SERIES except that in order to save time the 1 oi: papers are not typeset but are reproduced as they are sub 9 | d mitted by the authors in camera-ready form. Papers are re 97 viewed under the supervision of the Editors with the assistance 1 6, of the Series Advisory Board and are selected to maintain the pril integrity of the symposia; however, verbatim reproductions of A e: previously published papers are not accepted. Both reviews Dat and reports of research are acceptable since symposia may on embrace both types of presentation. ati c bli u P In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. PREFACE Since World War II the development and use of new chemicals, chemical processes, and chemical products have created a new industrial environment. Technology, which gave us progress, also has supplied some techniques for identifying those substances that are hazardous and for protecting workers who use the hazardous materials. To understand the threat posed to employees by explosives and toxic substances, it is necessary to understand the proliferation of chemicals, the difficulties of identifying illnesses caused by exposure to toxic substances, and the ways of controlling and quantitatively measuring these hazards so that 1 0 the risk to employees is minimized. The establishment of multilevel 0 6.pr regulatory controls depending upon the estimated degree of exposure 9 0 risk and the amount of toxicological information available is presented. 0 79- The symposium papers provide a means for developing and subse 9 k-1 quently implementing relevant engineering design criteria which are the b 1/ most efficient and cost effective for explosives and toxic chemical facilities. 2 10 For both facilities, the series of papers provide the means for classification, 0. 1 measurement, and control of inherent hazards. Practical examples are doi: provided on specific work practices and engineering controls for propellant 9 | and propulsion facilities, and for the production, storage, maintenance, 7 9 6, 1 surveillance, and demilitarization of explosives. Practical examples of the pril engineering design criteria used in the design of new university chemical A laboratories, in handling and transportation of toxic chemicals, and in the ate: National Cancer Institute's Chemical Carcinogen Facilities are included D n in this symposium series. This symposium series also provides design o ati criteria needed for both explosives and toxic chemical facilities, examples c bli of which are the design of lightning prediction and protection systems, u P and electrical requirements in hazardous locations. Department of Defense R. A. SCOTT, JR. Explosives Safety Board Alexandria, Virginia December, 1978 ix In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. 1 Safety Design Considerations in Munition Plants Layout RICHARD M. RINDNER and IRVING FORSTEN ARRADCOM, Dover, NJ 07801 1 0 0 h c 6. 9 Criteria and methods "based on results of accidental explo 0 9-0 sions have been used until the mid-sixties for the design of high 7 explosive manufacturing and storage facilities. These criteria, 9 k-1 however, did not include a detailed or reliable quantitative 1/b basis for assessing a degree of protection afforded by the protec 02 tive facility, and as a result Picatinny Arsenal (nov part of 1 0. ARRADCOM) in the early 60's entered into a broad tri-service pro 1 oi: gram of analysis, testing, and evaluation of structures designed d to afford protection against the effects of accidental explosions. 79 | The experimental work involved model and full scale testing of 9 1 reinforced concrete structures and their components. New designs pril 6, wceornef igcuonrcaetiivoends waendr e thdee ttehrrmeisnheodl.d cThaep acviatliideist y ofo fv atrhieo uuss es torfu cstcuarlaeld A e: model testing to replace full scale tests was demonstrated. at The product of this 8 year systematic study was the publica D n tion of the safety design manual entitled, "Structures to Resist o ati the Effects of Accidental Explosions" (Army's Publication c bli TM5-1300). An outline of studies leading to publication of this Pu manual is shown in Fig 1. The manual contains procedures, charts, and tables required to establish the environment of an explosion and its output in terms of blast and fragments. The relations are presented in such a manner that the type of protective struc ture may be selected, analyzed, and designed to provide a safe level of protection for personnel, equipment, and for separation of potentially mass detonating materials. In the course of the application of the manual to the Army- Wide Munition Plant Modernization Program, potential areas for improving and refining the manual appeared. Whenever specific information was not available, the most conservative approach was used. Consequently an extensive program, including testing, was initiated to establish data and procedures to supplement and/or modify the existing regulations and to assist designers in devel oping the most economical and safe facilities. This chapter not subject to U.S. copyright. Published 1979 American Chemical Society In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. 2 TOXIC CHEMICAL AND EXPLOSIVES FACILITIES 1 0 0 h c 6. 9 0 0 9- 7 9 1 k- b 1/ 2 0 1 0. 1 oi: d 9 | 7 9 1 6, pril A e: at D n o ati c bli u P In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979. 1. RINDNER AND FORSTEN Munition Plant Layout 3 The overall program was divided into several separate "but interrelated phases, which will "be presented in the following discussion as shown in Fig 2. These are: (a) TNT Equivalency Investigation (b) Safe Separation Distance Determination (c) Explosive Sensitivity to Impact by Primary and Second ary Fragments (d) Blast Effects and Structural Response Studies (e) Hazard Classification Studies of In-Process Hazardous Materials 1 0 h0 (f) Development of Special Purpose Water Deluge Systems c 6. 9 0 In the following pages the individual phases will be dis 0 9- cussed in some detail. 7 9 1 bk- TNT Equivalency Study 1/ 2 0 1 The purpose of this study is to generate peak pressure and 0. 1 impulse data on explosives, propellants, and other hazardous oi: materials which are compared to similar parameters obtained from d 9 | a hemispherical surface burst of TNT (Fig 3). The results are 97 reduced to a TNT equivalency value, which is defined as the weight 1 6, ratio of TNT to test material for a given output condition. pril Various factors influence the magnitude of TNT equivalency. These A include; charge geometry, critical mass/dimensions, confinement, ate: distance from the charge burst, and method of initiation. D Measurements of airblast overpressure and impulse were made n o at 12 gage locations along a double blast line (Fig h). The gages cati were spaced at selected scaled distances ranging from approxi ubli mately 2-20 ft/lbs1/3. The pressure transducers were installed P flushed with the top surface of a concrete slab in mechanically isolated steel plates. The test item was placed on a steel witness plate located on the surface of the slab. Fastax motion pictures were taken of all tests. On the basis of experimental data on a variety of explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics, we have observed that these mate rials fall into two categories, which can be described in terms of their TNT equivalency-distance curves. The two categories are characterized as marginal explosives and high explosives. The shape of these curves for materials that we call marginal explo sives, such as Black Powder, can be seen in Fig 5. The TNT equivalency increases with scaled distance to approximately 10 ft/lb!/3 and then decreases. In all cases, however, the maxi mum value of TNT equivalency is well below 100 percent. Materials, In Toxic Chemical and Explosives Facilities; Scott, R.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

Description:
Content: Safety design considerations in munition plants layout / Richard M. Rindner and Irving Forsten -- Shielding of facilities for work with explosive materials / David J. Katsanis -- Newly developed technology for ecological demilitarization of munitions / F.H. Crist -- Lightning and the hazard
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.