IN VIVO The Cultural Mediations of Biomedical Science PHILLIP THURTLE and ROBERT MITCHELL, Series Editors in vivo: the cultural mediations of biomedical science is dedicated to the interdisciplinary study of the medical and life sciences, with a focus on the scientific and cultural practices used to process data, model knowledge, and communicate about biomedical science. Through historical, artistic, media, social, and literary analysis, books in the series seek to understand and explain the key conceptual issues that animate and inform biomedical developments. The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging by José Van Dijck Generating Bodies and Gendered Selves: The Rhetoric of Reproduction in Early Modern England by Eve Keller The Emergence of Genetic Rationality: Space, Time, and Information in American Biological Science, 1870–1920 by Phillip Thurtle Bits of Life: Feminist Studies of Media, Biocultures, and Technoscience edited by Anneke Smelik and Nina Lykke Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era by Melinda Cooper HIV Interventions: Biomedicine and the Traffic between Information and Flesh by Marsha Rosengarten Bioart and the Vitality of Media by Robert Mitchell Affect and Artificial Intelligence by Elizabeth A. Wilson Darwin’s Pharmacy: Sex, Plants, and the Evolution of the Noösphere by Richard M. Doyle The Clinic and Elsewhere: Addiction, Adolescents, and the Afterlife of Therapy by Todd Meyers The Pulse of Modernism: Physiological Aesthetics in Fin-de-Siècle Europe by Robert Michael Brain THE PULSE OF MODERNISM Physiological Aesthetics in Fin-de-Siècle Europe ROBERT MICHAEL BRAIN university of washington press Seattle and London sponsored in part by duke university’s center for interdisciplinary studies in science and cultural theory © 2015 by the University of Washington Press Printed and bound in the United States of America Composed in Meridien and Univers, typefaces designed by Adrian Frutiger 19 18 17 16 15 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. university of washington press po Box 50096, Seattle, wa 98145, usa www.washington.edu/uwpress library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Brain, Robert Michael, 1959– The pulse of modernism : physiological aesthetics in Fin-de-Si?cle Europe / Robert Michael Brain. pages cm. — (In Vivo) Includes bibliographical references. isbn 978-0-295-99320-1 (hard cover : acid-free paper) — isbn 978-0-295-99321-8 (pbk. : acid-free paper) 1. Aesthetics—Physiological aspects. 2. Modernism (Aesthetics)—Europe. 3. Modernism (Literature)—Europe. 4. Modernism (Art)—Europe. I. Title. bh301.p45b73 2015 111’.85094—dc23 2014040342 The paper used in this publication is acid-free and meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48–1984.∞ For Parisa Why is there such a thing as beauty in sound, color, scent, or rhythmical movement in nature? What causes beauty to emerge? . . . Art is the greatest stimulant to life: how could one understand it as aimless, as useless, as l’art pour l’art? Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols (1889) A bit later, some innovators emboldened themselves. They deliberately broke with conventions, demanding no more than their instinct for rhythm and the sensitivity of their ear, the cadences and the musical substance of their verses. Their attempts also depended on the theoretical research found on the works of phoneticians, and on the recordings of the voice. . . . In the period between 1880 and 1890, several hardy spirits undertook to construct a doctrine of art derived from then fashionable theses of psycho- physics. The study of sensibility by the methods of physics, research into the (hypothetical) correspondence of sensations, the energetic analysis of rhythm, were all enterprises not without effect on painting and poetry. Paul Valéry, “Existence du symbolism” (1936) [The work of art bears] a hidden rhythm—still more vital that we perceive it ourselves—of our soul, similar to those sphygmographic traces that auto- matically inscribe the pulsations of our blood. Marcel Proust, “Sur la lecture,” preface to John Ruskin, Sésame et les lys (1906) Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction xiii Part 1. Experimentalizing Life 3 1 / Representation on the Line: Graphic Method as Experimental System 5 2 / The Vibratory Organism: Protoplasm and General Physiology 37 3 / Visible Speech: Experimental Phonetics and the Physiology of Vocalization 64 Part 2. Experimentalizing Art 93 4 / Algorithms of Pleasure: Art as Expert System 95 5 / Liberating Verse: Rhythm and Measure in Poetry 150 6 / Sensory Fusion: Evolution and Synesthesia in Art and Aesthetics 174 7 / Art for Life’s Sake: Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Abstraction in Early Modernism 201 Conclusion 226 Notes 231 Bibliography 289 Index 334 Acknowledgments MANY YEARS OF WORK AND AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF SUPPORT has made this book possible. Early research was carried out with fellowships from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the University of Cambridge Renaissance Trust. Much of the subsequent research was carried out during fellowships at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in the research groups of Lorraine Daston (1998, 2000, 2010) and Otto Sibum (2003, 2005). Further research was conducted with a Harvard University Tozzer Faculty Research Grant (1999), a University of British Columbia HSS/SSHRC Research Grant, and a visiting professorship at the Department of the History of Science and Ideas at Uppsala University. I am also grateful for the generosity of my faculty colleagues at the Univer- sity of British Columbia, especially Danny Vickers and Anne Gorsuch, for patience and support in various forms, including permitting me to take time off to complete this project. Several people provided critical late-stage assistance with the manu- script. My colleagues Alexei Kojevnikov and Neil Safier read chapters and provided crucial advice, as well as practical and moral support. I am deeply indebted to two anonymous referees, one of whom I now know to be John Tresch, for lengthy reports brimming with skill, insight, professionalism, and generosity that helped me improve this book in many ways; to John and the second referee, whoever you are, my enduring gratitude. Special thanks to Audra Wolfe of the Outside Reader for providing timely and indispensable developmental editing expertise. John Pickstone read the completed manu- script and made numerous helpful suggestions. I am also grateful for precise copyediting help from Eric Michael Johnson and, especially, Ken Corbett, who worked beyond the call of duty in the face of critical deadlines. Working with Tim Zimmerman, my editor at the University of Washington Press, has been a pleasure. Many thanks as well to Phillip Thurtle and Robert Mitchell, the In Vivo series editors, for good advice and strong support. ix