ebook img

The interaction of planets with a disc with MHD turbulence III: Flow morphology and conditions for gap formation in local and global simulations PDF

1.1 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The interaction of planets with a disc with MHD turbulence III: Flow morphology and conditions for gap formation in local and global simulations

Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.000,000–000 (0000) Printed2February2008 (MNLATEXstylefilev1.4) The interaction of planets with a disc with MHD turbulence III: Flow morphology and conditions for gap formation in local and global simulations John C.B. Papaloizou, Richard P. Nelson & Mark D. Snellgrove Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary, Universityof London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS 4 Received/Accepted 0 0 2 ABSTRACT n We present the results of both global cylindrical disc simulations and local shearing a box simulations of protoplanets interacting with a disc undergoing MHD turbulence J with zero net flux magnetic fields. We investigate the nature of the disc response and 0 conditions for gapformation. This issue is animportant one for determining the type 2 andnature ofthe migrationofthe protoplanet,withthe presenceof adeep gapbeing believed to enable slower migration. 2 v For both types of simulation we find a common pattern of behaviour for which 1 the main parameter determining the nature of the response is MpR3/(M∗H3), with 5 Mp,M∗,R, and H being the protoplanet mass, the central mass, the orbital radius 3 and the disc semi–thickness respectively. We find that as MpR3/(M∗H3) is increased 8 to ∼ 0.1 the presence of the protoplanet is first indicated by the appearance of the 0 well known trailing wake which, although it may appear to be erratic on account of 03 the turbulence, appears to be well defined. Once MpR3/(M∗H3) exceeds a number around unity a gap starts to develop inside which the magnetic energy density tends / h to be concentrated in the high density wakes. This condition for gap formation can p beunderstoodfromsimpledimensionalconsiderationsoftheconditionsfornonlinear- - ity and the balance of angular momentum transport due to Maxwell and Reynolds’ o stresses with that due to tidal torques applied to the parameters of our simulations. r t An important result is that the basic flow morphology in the vicinity of the pro- s a toplanet is very similar in both the local and global simulations. This indicates that, : regardless of potentially unwanted effects arising from the periodic boundary con- v ditions, local shearing box simulations, which are computationally less demanding, i X capturemuchofthephysicsofdisc–planetinteractions.Thusthey mayprovideause- r fultoolforstudyingthelocalinteractionbetweenformingprotoplanetsandturbulent, a protostellar discs. Key words: accretion,accretiondisks—MHD,instabilities,turbulence–planetary systems: formation, protoplanetary discs 1 INTRODUCTION planets are likely to form at significantly larger radii than those observed, requiring a migration mechanism to bring The recent and ongoing discovery of extrasolar giant plan- themclosertothecentralstar.Disc–protoplanetinteraction ets has stimulated much current investigation of theories providesa natural mechanism. of planet formation (e.g. Mayor & Queloz 1995; Marcy, Inthestandardpictureaprotoplanetexertstorqueson Cochran, & Mayor 1999; Vogt et al. 2002). At the present a protostellar disc through the excitation of spiral density time giant planets are believed to originate in protostellar waves(e.g.Goldreich &Tremaine1979). Thesewavescarry discs.Possibleformation scenarios areeitherthroughdirect anassociated angularmomentumfluxwhichisdepositedin gravitationalfragmentationofayoungprotostellardisc(e.g. thediscwherethewavesaredamped.Thisprocessresultsin Boss2001)orthroughtheaccumulationofasolidcorewhich a negative torque acting on the protoplanet from the outer thenundergoesmassbuildupthroughgasaccretiononcethe discandapositivetorqueactingonitfromthediscinterior core mass reaches 15 Earth masses (e.g. Bodenheimer & toitsorbit,withtheouterdisctorquenormallydominating. ≃ Pollack 1986; Pollack et al. 1996). In either scenario giant Forlowmassplanetsthatinducelinearperturbationsinthe (cid:13)c 0000RAS 2 J.C.B.Papaloizou, R.P. Nelson & M.D. Snellgrove disc, the resulting migration is usually referred to as type I estimated but most other features of theglobal simulations migration. are reproduced. Previousworkontheinteractionbetweenaprotoplanet In this paper we focus on the morphology of the disc andalaminardiscwithNavierStokesviscosity(Papaloizou response as a function of the protoplanet mass leaving the & Lin 1984; Lin & Papaloizou 1993) indicates that a suf- analysis of the disc–protoplanet torques resulting from the ficiently massive protoplanet can open up an annular gap interaction to a companion paper (Nelson & Papaloizou in the disc centred on its orbital radius. For typical pro- 2003b – hereafter paper IV). tostellar disc models the protoplanet needs to be approxi- The plan of thispaper is as follows: mately a Jovian mass for gap formation to occur. Recent In 2wedescribeboththeinitialglobaldiscmodelsandthe § simulations (Bryden et al. 1999; Kley 1999; Lubow, Seib- shearing box models used for thesimulations. ert, & Artymowicz 1999; D’Angelo, Henning, & Kley 2002) In 3 we discuss the nature of the waves that can propa- § examined the formation of gaps by giant protoplanets, and gate and how their excitation leads to the existence of the also estimated the maximal gas accretion rate onto them. prominentwakethatisfrequentlyseeninthesimulationsof The orbital evolution of a Jovian mass protoplanet embed- protoplanetdiscinteractionevenwhenthediscisturbulent. ded in a standard laminar viscous protostellar disc model In 4 we describe thenumerical procedureused. § was studied by Nelson et al. (2000). They found that that In 5 we present the results of the local and global simula- § gap formation and accretion of the inner disc by the cen- tions. Finally, we summarize our results in 6 . § tral mass led to the formation of a low density inner cavity in which the planet orbits. Interaction with the outer disc resulted in inward migration on a time scale of a few 105 × yr. Here the viscous evolution of the disc is responsible for 2 SET UP OF INITIAL MODELS drivingtheinwardmigrationofthegiantplanet.Thismode Inthispaperwehaveperformedbothglobalandlocalsimu- of migration is normally referred to as type II migration. lationsofprotoplanetsinteractingwithmodeldiscsinwhich Recent work examining gap formation, mass accretion, and MHD turbulence driven by the MRI operates. We consider migrationtorquesinthreedimensionshasbeenpresentedby simulationsforwhichthemagneticfieldhaszeronetfluxand D’Angelo, Kley, & Henning (2003) and Bate et al. (2003). thereforeaninternallygenerateddynamoismaintained.We The disc models in these studies all adopted an anomalous determinethediscresponseasafunctionoftheprotoplanet discviscositymodelledthroughtheNavier–Stokesequations massandasfarasispossiblestudyitscharacteristicsforthe without consideration of its origin. differentkindsof model focusing on theconditions that de- Themost likely origin oftheviscosity isthrough MHD terminewhethertheresponseisweak(linear)orstrong(non turbulence resulting from the magnetorotational instability linear).Wenowdescribethemodelsetupfortheglobaland (MRI) (Balbus & Hawley 1991) and it has recently become local simulations. possible through improvements in computational resources to simulate discs in which this underlying mechanism re- sponsible forangular momentumtransport isexplicitly cal- 2.1 Global Simulations culated.Thisisnecessarybecausetheturbulentfluctuations do not necessarily result in transport phenomena that can The governing equations for MHD written in a frame ro- bemodelled with theNavier Stokesequation. tating with arbitrary uniform angular velocity Ωpkˆ with kˆ To this end Papaloizou & Nelson (2003) and Nelson & beingtheunit vectoralong therotation axisassumed tobe Papaloizou (2003a) (hereafter papers I and II) developed in the vertical (z) direction are the continuityequation: models of turbulentprotostellar accretion discs and consid- ∂ρ ered the interaction with a giant protoplanet of 5 Jupiter + ρv=0, (1) ∂t ∇· masses. The large mass was chosen to increase the scale of the interaction so reducing the computational resources re- theequation of motion quired. This protoplanet was massive enough to maintain ∂v p ( B) B a deep gap separating the inner and outer disc and exert +v v+2Ωpkˆ v= ∇ Φ+ ∇× × ,(2) ∂t ·∇ × − ρ −∇ 4πρ torques characteristic of type II migration. A study of gap formationinturbulentdiscshasalsobeenpresentedbyWin- and theinduction equation ters, Balbus, & Hawley (2003a) ∂B = (v B). (3) It is the purpose of this paper to extend our previous ∂t ∇× × work to a wider range of protoplanetary masses and disc where v,P,ρ,B and Φ denote the fluid velocity, pressure, parameters. In particular we study the nature of the disc density and magnetic field respectively. The potential Φ = protoplanet interaction as the protoplanet mass increases and Tinovedsotigthatisewtheeuctoilnisdeitbioonthfogrlogbaapl afonrdmlaotciaoln.simulations. Φcernottr+ifuΦgGalcponotteanintsiacloΦnrtoritb=ut−io(n1s/d2u)Ωe2pt|okˆg×rarv|i2t.y,ΦG andthe The gravitational contribution is taken to be due to a The global simulations are more realistic but too computa- centralmassM∗ andplanetwithmassMp.Thusincylindri- tionally demanding for significant extended parameter sur- calcoordinates(r,φ,z)withtheplanetlocatedat(rp,φp,0) veys.Ontheotherhandlocalshearingboxsimulationsbeing and thestar located at (r∗,φ∗,0) ΦG =Φc+Φp, where less computationally demanding enable a wider parameter sduergvreeyeoaftshyimghmeertrryestohluetyiodno.nOoftcaolluorwsembiegcraautisoenorfattehsethoigbhe Φc =−|rG−Mr∗∗| and Φp =− r2+rp2−2rGrpMcops(φ−φp)+b2.(4) p (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 Protoplanets and MHD turbulence 3 Here,asinpapersIandII,forreasonsofcomputationalex- G5 it was placed at (rp r∗ ,φp) = (2.5,π/4). All simu- | − | pediency, we have neglected the dependence of the gravita- lations were performed in a rotating frame whose angular tionalpotentialsonzalongwiththeverticalstratificationof velocity equalled that of the circular Keplerian planetary thedisc.Thustheglobalsimulationsareofcylindricaldiscs orbit.The unitof time adopted when discussing theresults (e.g.Armitage1998,2001;Hawley2000,2001;Steinacker& is Ω−1 evaluated at r = 1, the inner boundary of the com- Papaloizou 2002). To model the effects of the reduction of putational domain. We note that the orbital period at this the planet potential with vertical height, we have incorpo- radius is P(r = 1) = 2π, the orbital period of a planet at rated a softening length b in its potential. rp = 2.5 is P(r = 2.5) 24, and the orbital period of a ≃ Weuse a locally isothermal equation of state in theform planet at rp =3 is P(r=3) 32. ≃ In order to explore the disc–planet interaction over a P =ρ c(r)2, (5) · wider range of parameter space and with higher resolution withcdenotingthesoundspeedwhichisspecifiedasafixed inthevicinityoftheplanet,wehaveadoptedalocalshearing functionofthecylindricalradiusr.Theabovegivesthebasic box approximation. This we describe below. equations used for theglobal simulations. 2.2 Local Shearing Box Simulations 2.1.1 Initial and Boundary Conditions In the shearing box limit (Goldreich & Lynden-Bell 1965) The global simulations presented here all use the same un- we consider a small Cartesian box centred on the point at derlying turbulent disc model. This model has a constant which the Keplerian angular velocity is Ωp. Wedefine local aspect ratio H/r c(r)/(rΩ) = 0.07, where Ω is the disc Cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) with associated unit vectors ≡ angularvelocityasmeasuredintheinertialframe.Theinner (i,j,k).Thedirectioniistakentobeoutwardalongtheline radial boundaryof thecomputational domain is at Rin =1 joiningtheorigin tothecentralobjectwhilekpointsinthe andtheouterboundaryisatRout=8.Theboundarycondi- vertical direction. The direction j is along the unperturbed tions employed are very similar to those described in paper rotational shear flow. I. Regions of the disc in the close vicinity of the inner and The equation of motion may then bewritten as outerboundariesweregivennon–Keplerianangularvelocity ∂v p ( B) B pvarolufielsesofththaet daerenssittyabilneotrodetrhetoMmRaIin,taanindrwadhiiachlhhyadvreosltaartgiec ∂t+v·∇v+2Ωpkˆ×v−3Ω2pxi=−∇ρ −∇Φp+ ∇×4πρ× .(6) equilibrium. These regions act as buffer zones that prevent Theinductionandcontinuityequationsretainthesame the penetration of magnetic field to the radial boundaries, formasequations(3)and(1)butareofcourseexpressedin thusmaintainingzero-netfluxinthecomputationaldomain. component form in the local box centred Cartesian coordi- The inner buffer zone runs from r = 1.14 to r = Rin, and nates.Werecallthattheterm xinequation(6)isderived theouter bufferzone runsfrom r=7.0 to r=Rout. fromafirstorderTaylorexpan∝sionaboutx=0ofthecom- Thediscwasinitiatedwithazeronetfluxtoroidalmag- bination of thegravitational acceleration duetothecentral netic field in a finite annulus in the disc between the radii massandthecentrifugalacceleration (Goldreich&Lynden- 2 r 6.Theinitialfieldvariedsinusoidallyoverfourcom- Bell 1965). However, as for the global disc simulations, we ≤ ≤ plete cycles within this radial domain, and the initial ratio haveneglectedthez dependenceofthegravitationalpoten- ofthevolumeintegratedmagnetic energytothevolumein- tialandthereforeverticalstratification.Thusinthisrespect tegrated pressurewas 1/β =0.032. The initial disc model thesimulations areof unstratifiedboxesofthetypeconsid- h i had azimuthal domain running between φ = 0 to π/4, and ered by Hawley, Gammie & Balbus (1995). vertical domain from zmin = 0.21 to zmax = 0.21. Peri- Here,whenintroduced,theplanetislocatedinthecen- − odicboundaryconditionswereemployedintheverticaland treof thebox, thus azimuthal directions. TheunperturbeddiscmodelwasevolveduntiltheMRI Φp = GMp . (7) produced a turbulent disc model with a statistically steady − x2+y2+b2 turbulence.This model had a volumeaveraged valueof the p Inthesteadystateboxwithnoplanetormagneticfield, ratio of magnetic energy to mean pressure of 0.011 and ≃ theequilibrium velocity is dueto Keplerian shear and thus avolumeaveraged valueof theShakura–Sunyaevstress pa- rameter α 7 10−3. In order to generate the full 2π disc v=(0, 3Ωpx/2,0). (8) ≃ × − modelsusedtostudytheinteractionbetweenturbulentdiscs We adopt an isothermal equation of state P = ρc2, and protoplanets, eight identical copies of this relaxed disc with c being thesound speed which is taken to beconstant sector werejoined together. Themodel described in table2 throughout thebox. with azimuthal domain π/2 (run G5) contained only two copies of the π/4 sector, and periodic boundary conditions were employed in theazimuthal domain. 2.2.1 Initial and Boundary Conditions Gravitational softening of the protoplanet was em- ployed in all simulations. In runs G1–G4 described in ta- Theshearingboxispresumedtorepresentalocalpatchofa ble 2, the softening parameter b=0.33H. For run G5, this differentially rotating disc. Thus the appropriate boundary was reduced to b = 0.1H. For runs G1, G2, and G3, the conditions on the bounding faces y = constant = Y and ± planet was placed at a radius such that rp r∗ = 3 and z =constant = Z derive from the requirement of period- | − | ± at azimuthal location φp = π in the disc. For runs G4 it icity in the local Cartesian coordinate directions normal to was placed such that (rp r∗ ,φp) = (2.5,π) and for run theboundaries.Ontheboundaryfacesx=constant= X, | − | ± (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 4 J.C.B.Papaloizou, R.P. Nelson & M.D. Snellgrove the boundary requirement is for periodicity in local shear- nitude of the disc density may be arbitrarily scaled. The ing coordinates. Thus for any state variable F(x,y,z), the models simulated here all start with a uniform density ρ 0 condition is that F(X,y,z) = F( X,y 3ΩpXt,z). This which, together with H, may be used to specify the mass − − meansthatinformationononeradialboundaryfaceiscom- scaling. Then we define a dimensionless density and mag- municated to the other boundary face at a location in the neticfieldthroughρ′=ρ0ρandB′ =B/(ΩpH√4πρ0).The azimuthalcoordinateyshiftedbythedistancethefaceshave equationofmotion maybewrittenin theabovedimension- sheared apartsincethestart ofthesimulation,t,(seeHaw- less variables in the form ley,Gammie & Balbus 1995). paraFmoertearllwmasodtealksenadaosptbin=g 0a.3sHhe.aTrinhge pbootxe,ntthiaelswoaftsenfliantg- ∂∂vt′′ +v′·∇v′+2kˆ×v′−3x′i= tened(madetoattainaconstantvalueinacontinuousman- ner)atlargedistancesfromtheprotoplanetinordertosat- (ρ′c′2) ′ ( B′) B′ ∇ Φ + ∇× × , (9) isfy the periodic boundary conditions. In simulations Ba0– − ρ′ −∇ p ρ′ Ba4(describedintable1)thiswasdoneoutsidethecylinder where ofradius3H centredontheplanet.InsimulationsBb1–Bb4 ′ this was done only close to theboundary. Φ′ = Mp , (10) ThesimulationsBa0–Ba4occupiedatotalwidth8H in p − x′2+y′2+b′2 xand4πH iny.Theseboxeswerefoundtobelargeenough p ′ with dimensionless softening parameter b = b/H and of toaccomodatethescaleofthediscresponsetoforcingbythe coursethespatialderivativesarewithrespecttothedimen- protoplanet and enable gap formation. But notethat inter- sionless coordinates. Similarly the dimensionless induction ferencefrom protoplanetsinneighbouringboxesimplied by equation becomes theperiodic boundaryconditions is not eliminated entirely. In the small protoplanet mass regime waves propagate be- ∂B′ ′ ′ = (v B). (11) tweenboxesandinthenonlinearregimetorquesexertedby ∂t′ ∇× × protoplanets in neighbouring boxes may influence the gap and thedimensionless continuity equation is formation process. However, comparison between local and global runs indicates that such effects are not major and ∂ρ′ ′ ′ + (ρv)=0. (12) do not prevent the box runs from capturing the essential ∂t′ ∇ · physics. We remark that in dimensionless coordinates the To examine the effect of varying box size we ran simu- boundaries of the box are x′ = X/H, y′ = Y/H, lationsBb1–Bb4whichwereofthesameresolution buthad z′ = Z/H. Also if the magnetic fi±eld has zero n±et flux twice the extentin y. and is±dynamo generated and thus a spontaneous prod- Allofthesemodelswereinitiatedbyimposingavertical uct of the simulation, given that the only parameter oc- field,withzeronetfluxthroughthebox,varyingsinusoidally curring in equations (9 - 12 ) is the dimensionless mass in x with a wavelength of H. The amplitude was such that Mp′ = MpR3/(M∗H3), we should be able to consider the theinitial valueof theratio of thetotal magneticenergy to dependenceofthetimeaveragedoutcomeofasimulationto volume integrated pressure was 0.0025. The initial velocity beonly on X/H,Y/H,Z/H, and Mp′ =MpR3/(M∗H3). in the x direction at each grid point was chosen to be the For a planet embedded in a box with natural verti- productofarandomnumberbetween 1.0and1.0and0.1c. cal scale H with sufficiently large X/H to incorporate the − Theinitialvelocityinthey–directionisgivenbyequation8, tidalinteraction without interferencefrom other boxescen- andthez componentofvelocitywasinitializedtozero.The tred on different radii, the only parameters determining unitoftimeforallsimulationswastakentobeΩ−p1.Inthese long term averaged properties of a simulation should be unitsthe orbital period at the centreof the box is 2π. Y/H and M′. Thus for such a quantity Q, we should have p Q=f(Y/H,MpR3/(M∗H3)). Note that the above discussion implies that for a box 2.3 Dimensionless Variables and Scaling with of fixed dimension, the only distinguishing parameter is Planet Mass Mp′ = MpR3/(M∗H3). This parameter may also be inter- It is helpful to write the governing equations for the shear- preted as the cube of the ratio of the Hill radius to disc ing box in dimensionless form. In this way the dependence scale height and the condition that M′ > 1 leads to the p of theoutcomes of the simulations on planet mass and disc thermal condition of Lin & Papaloizou (19∼93) that the Hill parameters is made clearer (see also Korycansky & Pa- radiusshouldexceedthediscscaleheightforgapformation paloizou 1996). To do this we adopt dimensionless coordi- to occur. From Korycansky & Papaloizou (1996) this con- nates (x′,y′,z′)=(x/H,y/H,z/H), where the length scale ditionisalsorequiredinorderthattheperturbationdueto H = c/Ωp would correspond to the disc scale height were theprotoplanet be non linear. it vertically stratified and the dimensionless time t′ = Ωpt. Theabovediscussionindicatesthatwerewetovarythe We also note that the Keplerian relation Ω2p = GM∗/R3, boxsizeintheazimuthal(y)direction,theconditionforgap ′ may be used to relate the rotation rate of the centre of the formation should be of the form Mp > fg(Y/H). As gap box to a putative central mass M∗ and orbital radius R. formation by the same planet in a longer box is expected We now introduce the dimensionless velocity, sound speed to be more difficult, we expect fg to be a non decreasing andplanetmassthroughv′=v/(ΩpH),c′ =c/(ΩpH),and function of its argument. In order to correspond to a full Mp′ =MpR3/(M∗H3)respectively.Aswedonotincludethe circle of radius R,we requirethat Y =πR. self-gravity of the disc in calculating its response, the mag- Itisperhapssuggestivetopointoutthatiffg(πR/H)= (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 Protoplanets and MHD turbulence 5 Model z domain xdomain y domain t1 t2 (MpR3/(M∗H3) nz nx ny Ba0 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−2πH,2πH) 0.0 637 0.0 35 261 200 Ba1 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−2πH,2πH) 354 621 0.1 35 261 200 Ba2 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−2πH,2πH) 354 644 0.3 35 261 200 Ba3 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−2πH,2πH) 354 619 1.0 35 261 200 Ba4 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−2πH,2πH) 354 650 2.0 35 261 200 Bb1 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−4πH,4πH) 216 392 0.2 35 261 396 Bb2 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−4πH,4πH) 216 431 0.5 35 261 396 Bb3 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−4πH,4πH) 216 411 1.0 35 261 396 Bb4 (−H/2,H/2) (−4H,4H) (−4πH,4πH) 216 485 2.0 35 261 396 Table 1.Parametersoftheshearingboxsimulations:Thefirstcolumngivesthesimulationlabel,thesecond,thirdandfourthgivethe extent ofthe coordinate domainsconsidered. Thefirstninesimulationswereperformedinshearingboxes withthe x,y, andz domains referringtotheCartesiandomains.Thelasttwosimulationswereglobalsothatinthesecasesthex,y,andzdomainsrefertother,φ,and zdomainsforthecylindricalcoordinatesystemused.Thefifthandsixthcolumngivethestartandendtimesifthesimulationmeasured indimensionlessunits.Simulationswithprotoplanetswerestartedbyinsertingtheprotoplanetintotheturbulentmodelgeneratedfrom thesimulationBa0attimeindicated. Theseventh columngivesthevalueof(GMp/(Ω2H3).Theeighth, ninthandtenth columns give the number of computational grid points in the x,y, and z coordinates respectively. These numbers include any ghost zones used to handleboundaryconditions. 40α(R/H),theconditionforgapformation indicatedabove ally becoming a spiral wave propagating away from it (e.g. becomes Mp/M∗ >40αH2/(R2) which is of the same form Kley1999;Nelsonetal2000;Lubow,Seibert&Artymowicz as the viscous criterion of Lin & Papaloizou (1993) which 1999; Ogilvie & Lubow 2002). Such structures, though dis- wasobtainedbyrequiringangularmomentumtransportdue torted, are also seen in our simulations of discs with MHD to excited waves to exceed that due to viscosity. However, turbulence in which there are strong and highly time vari- it is important to note that if we introduce such an α pa- able fluctuations, even for weakly perturbing protoplanets. rameter here, it cannot correspond to an imposed viscosity In view of their importance and persistence we here give a asinLin&Papaloizou(1993).Insteaditmustberelatedto briefdiscussion oftheirinterpretationasbeingdefinedbya the turbulent transport arising from MHD turbulence. We characteristicrayemanatingfromtheprotoplanetthatsep- take it to correspond to a time average of the volume av- aratestheflowshearingpastitintopartscausallyconnected eraged stress BxBy/(4π) expressed inunitsofthevolume andnotcausally connectedbywaves.Thewakesthusnatu- h i averagedpressure P ,thuscorrespondingtotheShakura& rallycorrespondtothelocationastrongwavesentoutfrom h i Sunyaev(1973) parameterization.Thisprocedureisreason- theprotoplanet into theflow shearing past it. ably well defined in the parts of the disc not strongly per- turbedbyaprotoplanet(eg.PaperII).Forsimulationswith zero net magnetic flux α 5 10−3 but it takes on larger 3.1 The Characteristic Rays ∼ × values when a net poloidal or toroidal flux is imposed (eg. The set of basic equations defined by (1), (2) and (3) are Hawley, Gammie & Balbus 1996; Steinacker & Papaloizou well known to form a hyperbolic set which can be written 2002). Adopting α = 5 10−3, suggests fg(Y/H) in the standard form (Courant & Hilbert 1962) × ∼ 0.07(Y/H). We recall that should 0.07(Y/H) be less than unity,therequirementofnonlinearperturbationbythepro- A(k)∂Ui +B(k) =0 (k=1,2,....,n). (14) toplanet in order for gap formation to occur is Mp/M∗ > Xi,j (cid:18) ij ∂xj(cid:19) Ct(H/R)3, whereCt is a constant of order unity(Korycan- Here the set of equations (1), (2) and (3) are arranged into sky&Papaloizou 1996). Boththeseconditionscanbecom- a set of n simultaneous first order PDEs for the n compo- bined to give therequirement that nents Ui of U which are in turn composed of ρ together MpR3/(M∗H3)>max(Ct,0.07(Y/H)) (13) withthecomponentsofBandv.Thexj (j =1−4)arethe three spatial coordinates and the time t respectively. The In this way we may see how both the thermal and viscous characteristic rays, applicable to both the global and local conditionsofLin&Papaloizou(1993)mayberelatedtothe formulation may be found by first obtaining the local dis- simulations. persion relation associated with (14). To do this one sets Ui = Ui0exp(ikjxj iωt) under the assumption that the − magnitudes of the components of the wave vector k(l = l 3 WAKES AND CHARACTERISTICS 1,2,3) ≡ k = (kx,ky,kz) and the wave frequency |ω| are verylarge.Thedispersion relationisthengivenbythevan- A well known phenomenon found in simulations of proto- ishing of a determinant of coefficients |A(ijk)kj−A(i4k)ω|=0. planets interacting with laminar discs is a prominent wake As is very well known (eg. Campbell 1997) this dispersion that is observed to trail away from the protoplanet eventu- relationleadstothreedistinctwavemodes.Thefirstarethe (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 6 J.C.B.Papaloizou, R.P. Nelson & M.D. Snellgrove Model φdomain H/r Mp/M∗ (MpR3/(M∗H3) nr nφ nz G1 2π 0.07 1×10−5 0.03 450 1092 40 G2 2π 0.07 3×10−5 0.09 450 1092 40 G3 2π 0.07 1×10−4 0.30 450 1092 40 G4 2π 0.07 3×10−3 8.75 450 1092 40 G5 π/2 0.07 3×10−3 8.75 450 276 40 Table2.Parametersoftheglobalsimulations:Thefirstcolumngivesthesimulationlabel,thesecondgivestheextentoftheazimuthal domain,thethirdgivestheH/rvalueofthedisc,andthefourthgivestheprotoplanet-starmasratio.ThefifthgivestheratioofMp/M∗ to(H/r)3.Thesixth,seventh,andeighthcolumnsdescribethenumberofgridcellsusedineachcoordinate direction. Alfv´enwavespropagatinginoppositedirectionswhichhave theratioofthecomponentsandnotthemagnitudematters. ω = k v k vA, with vA = vAB/B, where vA is the The natural choice is kz = 0, and ky/kx such that ω = Alfv´e−n sp·eed±be·ing such that v2 = B|2/|(4πρ). The other 0. This is because we expect a zero frequency wave to be A | | modes are fast and slow magnetosonic waves which satisfy excited by the planet in a frame in which that is at rest. However,notethatin aturbulenttimedependentsituation (ω+kv)2= k2(c2+vA2) k4(c4+vA4)−2k2c2(k·vA)2).(15) ω would not be constant. · 2 ±p 2 The simplest situation is one when the flow is time in- Herek= k andwenotethatthefrequency,ωoccursadded dependent and the velocity is given by (8). In that case it | | to the quantity k v in these relations. This is due to the follows from equations (16) that both ω = 0 and ky are · Dopplershiftoccurringonaccountofthemotionofthefluid. constant. For each of these waves we may specify ω = ω(k,r,t). It further follows from equations (16) that the charac- Then the characteristic rays follow from integrating the teristic rays then satisfy equations of geometric optics (e.g. Whitham 1999) dy dr ∂ω dk ∂ω = v2/c2 1. (18) = , and = . (16) dx − y − dt ∂k dt −∂r p To be specific, we here concentrate on the fast mag- Usingequation(8)for vy andintegratingweobtainfor netosonic mode which in our case leads to the most rapid thecharacteristic ray for x>x 0 communication. Further,as for the most part the magnetic energyison theorderofonepercentofthethermalenergy, x 1 y/x = x2/x2 1+ ln x2/x2 1+x/x ,(19) we shall neglect the field so that the mode becomes an or- 0 −2x0p 0− 2 (cid:16)p 0− 0(cid:17) dinary sound wave such that with x = 2H/3. To complete the picture we remark that ω= k v+ck. (17) 0 − · thecharacteristicforx<0,canbefoundfromthecondition We consider the general situation to be one for which y( x)= y(x). − − the flow streams past the protoplanet from y > 0 to y < 0 We comment that the computational domains in all of for x > 0 and with the flow moving in the opposite sense our simulations are extensive enough to contain the char- for x < 0. Considering without loss of generality the case acteristic associated with the waves emitted by an exciting y > 0, when the flow streams past supersonically, if we ne- object, be it turbulent fluctuations or a protoplanet (i.e. x glect dependence on z, it is divided into two parts by the exceeds2/3H bya significant margin). characteristic originating close to theplanet from the point with y = 0 and the smallest possible positive value of x at whichtheflowspeedisequaltothewavespeed.Iftheplanet had no gravity,the fluid that is upstream of this character- istic would be unaware of thepresence of theplanet. Thefluidthatfirstknowsabouttheplanet,namelythat 4 NUMERICAL PROCEDURE onthecharacteristic isanaturalchannelforwavestoprop- agatethatareexcitedbytheplanetwhichiswhythisregion The numerical scheme that we employ is based on a spa- issoprominentinthesimulations.Notethattheconceptof tially second–order accurate method that computesthe ad- characteristicraysisrobustinthatitcanapplytoageneral vection usingthemonotonic transport algorithm (VanLeer time dependent fluid with turbulence. Also with z depen- 1977). The MHD section of the code uses the method of dence restored we would expect the fluid to be divided by characteristicsconstrained transport(MOCCT) asoutlined a surface made up from many rays rather than a single ray in Hawley & Stone (1995) and implemented in the ZEUS whichisofthesameformindependentofz.Thiswouldlead code. The code has been developed from a version of NIR- to some blurring of the wake. VANA originally written by U. Ziegler (see SP, Ziegler & Acharacteristicrayisdefinedbyitspointoforigin(here Ru¨diger (2000), and references therein) specifiedabove)andthevalueofk.However,notethatonly (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 Protoplanets and MHD turbulence 7 Figure 1.Theratioof thetotal magnetic energyto thevolume Figure 3. Density contour plot in a (x,y) plane for simulation integrated pressure, h1/βi, is plotted as a function of time for Ba0whichhasnoembeddedprotoplanet.Theextensionsare8H modelsBa0,Ba1,Ba2,Ba3,andBa4.Theplotsbegintoseparate in the x direction and 4πH in the y direction. The plot applies after the protoplanet is inserted at time 354.. At time 500 the neartheendofthesimulation.Therangeofvariationintheden- curves correspond to simulations Ba4, Ba1, Ba2,Ba3 and Ba0 sityisaboutafactorofthree.Thisistypicalofwhatisobtained with decreasing values of h1/βi respectively. Although there are inany (x,y) planeonce astatisticallysteady state turbulence is large fluctuations, the maximum variation at any time is factor setup.Notethetrailingelongated structures. of 3.This issignificantlysmallerthan thedensity depressionin thedeepest gap(seefigure10). 4.1 Vertically and Horizontally Averaged Stresses and Angular Momentum Transport Inordertodescribeaveragepropertiesoftheturbulentmod- els,following papersIandIIweusequantitiesthatarever- tically and azimuthally averaged over the (y,z) domain for the shearing boxes or the (φ,z) domain for the global sim- ulations (e.g. Hawley 2000). Thus we may consider y φ ≡ and x r in these cases. Sometimes an additional time av- ≡ erage may be adopted. The vertical and azimuthal average of some quantityQ is then defined through ρQdzdy Q= . (20) R ρdzdy R The disc surface density is given by 1 Σ= ρdzdy. (21) 2Y Z The vertically and azimuthally averaged Maxwell and Reynoldsstresses, are given by: Figure2.Thevolumeaveragedstressparameterhαiisplottedas afunctionoftimeformodel Ba0whichhas noprotoplanet. The TM =2YΣ BxBy (22) noisy full curve contains contributions from both the magnetic (cid:18) 4πρ (cid:19) andReynolds’stresseswhilethedottedcurvegivesthemagnetic and contribution. The dashed curve gives the running time average of the total stress. The large initial values are due to the initial TRe=2YΣδvxδvy. (23) strong instability which produces a channel phase. However, af- ter about four orbits at the centre of the box, the running time Here the velocity fluctuations δvx and δvy are defined averageiswithinafactoroftwoofthefinalvalue. through, δvx =vx vx, (24) − δvy =vy vy. (25) − ThehorizontallyandverticallyaveragedShakura&Sunyaev (1973) α stress parameter appropriate to the total stress is given by (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 8 J.C.B.Papaloizou, R.P. Nelson & M.D. Snellgrove Figure 5. The volume averaged total stress parameter hαi is plottedasafunctionoftimeformodelsBa1,Ba2,Ba3,andBa4. Theplotsbeginfromthemomenttheprotoplanetisinserted.The noisyuppercurvescontaincontributionsfromboththemagnetic andReynolds’stresses.Theycanbeidentifiedatearlytimesasfor Ba4(uppermost fullcurve), Ba3(uppermost dotted curve), Ba2 (next highest full curve), Ba1 (next highest dotted curve). The lowerandmuchlessnoisycurvesgivethemagneticcontribution. These aresimilaruntil they separate at about time 500. At this time they may be identified with increasing values of the stress parameterasassociatedwithBa1,Ba3,Ba2andBa4respectively. Thevaluesofthetotalhαishowasharpincreasewhentheproto- planet is inserted in the cases with higher mass protoplanets on accountoftheexcitationofdensitywaveswhichprovideangular momentumtransport. 5 NUMERICAL RESULTS We now present numerical results for the evolution of the Figure 4. Contours of magnetic energy density corresponding simulations. to the plot in figure 3. The upper plot corresponds to the (x,y) plane illustrated in figure 3 while the lower plot is taken in a characteristic(x,z)plane.TheextensionsareHinthezdirection 5.1 Shearing Box Simulations and8H inthexdirection.Duetoregionsofverysmallmagnetic All of the shearing boxes are derived from the simulation field, the range of variation of magnetic energy density is much larger than that of the density being as much as ∼ 107. These Ba0whichwascarriedoutwithoutaprotoplanet.Itsettled plots are typical of what is found for the turbulence once it has into a quasi steady state with conserved zero net flux and reached a statistically steady state. Note that trailingelongated dynamo maintained turbulence as has been been described features are also apparent in the distribution of the magnetic byothers(e.g.Hawley,Gammie&Balbus1996).Thismodel energydensity. was run for 100 orbits at the box centre. The ratio of the total magnetic energy to the volume integrated pressure, B2/(8π)dV/ PdV = 1/β , is plotted as a function of h i Rtime in figure 1R. After running for 354 time units, this model was used toprovideinitialconditionsformodelswithprotoplanetsof α= TRe−TM , (26) varying masses. Simulations Ba1, Ba2, Ba3, and Ba4 were 2YΣ(P/ρ) begun in this way with MpR3/(M∗H3) = 0.1,0.3,1.0 and 2.0respectively.Wealsoplot B2/(8π)dV/ PdV = 1/β The angular momentum flow across a line of constant x is as a function of time in figureR1 for modelsRBa1, Ba2,hBa3i, given by andBa4.Theplotsbegintoseparatefromeachothershortly after after the simulations with protoplanets have begun. =ΣWαP/ρ. (27) Note that although 1/β is in general confined between F h i 0.008 and 0.02 with or without a protoplanet, there are Here W = R2 for the shearing box simulations or W = r2 strong fluctuations on a range of timescales down to the for the global simulations. orbitaltimescale.Theexistenceofsuchfluctuationsandthe (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 Protoplanets and MHD turbulence 9 Figure 6. Density contour plots in a typical (x,y) plane for Figure 7. As in figure 6 but in this case magnetic energy den- simulations Ba1, top left, Ba2 top right, Ba3 bottom left, and sitycontoursareplotted.AsMpR3/(M∗H3)increasesandagap Ba4 bottom right taken near the end of the simulations. These forms,themagneticenergygenerallydecreasesinthegapregion. had MpR3/(M∗H3) = 0.1,0.3,1.0 and 2.0 respectively. As However,someremainsconcentratedinregionsnearthehighden- MpR3/(M∗H3) increases, the wake becomes more prominent, sitywakes.Thequalitativestructureseeninthesesimulationsis materialisaccretedbytheprotoplanetandispushedtowardthe maintainedonceaquasisteadystatehasbeenattained. radialboundariesasagapisformed.Thelocationofthecharac- teristicraygivenbyequation(19)isalsoplotted.Thequalitative structure seen in these simulations is maintained once a quasi initial strong instability which produced a channel phase. steadystatehasbeenattained. However, after about four orbits at the centre of the box, therunningtimeaverageiswithinafactoroftwoofitsfinal valueof0.008.Thisvalueisinagreementwiththatgivenin difficulties they cause for defining mean state variables for Winters, Balbus & Hawley (2003b). But note that therun- the turbulent flow has been emphasised recently by several ning time average still shows variations at the 10 percent authors (e.g. papers I and II; Winters, Balbus & Hawley level after 100 orbits. 2003b; Armitage 2002). The pattern of turbulence in simulation Ba0 is estab- Thevolumeaveragedstressparameter α isplottedas lished after several orbits. A typical density contourplot in h i a function of time for model Ba0 in figure 2. As for 1/β , a(x,y)planeispresentedinfigure3neartheendofthesim- h i erratic fluctuations are seen. The sum of the magnetic and ulation. The range of variation in the density in this plane Reynolds’ stresses nearly always exceeds the magnetic con- is about a factor of three. The situation illustrated here is tribution for which the short term fluctuations are signifi- typicalofwhat isobtainedinany(x,y)planeonceastatis- cantly less severe. In these respects the behaviour of local tically steady state turbulence is set up. Elongated trailing andglobalsimulationsaresimilar(Steinacker&Papaloizou structuresare noticeable. Weplot contours of themagnetic 2002,papersIandII,andsection5.2).Therunningtimeav- energy density in figure 4 which correspond to the plot in erageof α isalsoplottedandthisshowsmuchsmootherbe- figure 3. The upper plot corresponds to the (x,y) plane il- h i haviour. Somewhat large initial values occurbecause of the lustrated in figure 3 while the lower plot is taken in a char- (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000 10 J.C.B.Papaloizou, R.P. Nelson & M.D. Snellgrove Figure8.Plotscorrespondingtothoseinfigure6butformodels Figure9.Plotscorrespondingtothoseinfigure7butformodels Bb1,Bb2,Bb3,Bb4.Asimilarsequence isindicated. Bb1,Bb2,Bb3,Bb4.Asimilarsequence isindicated. acteristic(x,z)plane.Duetotheexistenceofregionswhere withH/R=0.1presentedinpaperIIandintheglobalsim- the magnetic field is near zero, the range of the magnetic ulations described in section 5.2. After a sharp initial rise energydensityismuchlargerthanthatofthemassdensity, thevolumeaveragedReynolds’stressheretendstodecrease being as much as 107. The plots are typical of what is as a gap is opened and material is moved away from the ∼ foundoncetheturbulencehasreachedaquasisteadystate. protoplanet.Themuchlessnoisyvolumeaveragedmagnetic stresses are also plotted in figure 5. These behave similarly When a protoplanet is placed in the centre of the box foreachofthesimulationsBa1,Ba2,Ba3andBa4butthey waves are excited that cause outward angular momentum then separate at about time 500. Although simulation Ba4 transport. These waves also have an associated Reynolds’ which has the highest protoplanet mass also tends to have stress (e.g. Papaloizou & Lin 1984) and may affect the un- the highest volume averaged magnetic stress, there is no derlying turbulence. other such correlation between magnetic stress and proto- Thevolumeaveragedtotalstressparameter α isplot- planet mass and so thismay not be significant. h i tedasafunctionoftimeformodelsBa1,Ba2,Ba3,andBa4 Although, as we have indicated above, strong fluctu- in figure 5. The plots commence from the moment when ations are indeed the rule, there are definite behavioural the protoplanet was introduced. The introduction causes trendsastheprotoplanetmassincreases.Toillustratethese, the excitation of a wave and an increase in the Reynolds’ densitycontourplotsinatypical(x,y)planeforsimulations stress which in turn increases the total stress. This is par- Ba1, Ba2 Ba3 and Ba4 near the end of the simulations are ticularly noticeable in simulations Ba3 and Ba4 which have showninfigure6.Itcanbeseen thatasMpR3/(M∗H3)in- MpR3/(M∗H3)=1.0and2.0respectivelyandsohavelarge creases, the wake becomes more prominent. It can be seen enoughprotoplanetstoformagap.Thisbehaviourwasalso that this wake approximately coincides with that given by found in thesimulation of a 5 Jupitermass planet in a disc equation (19) derived from the discussion about character- (cid:13)c 0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.