ebook img

TAXONOMIC STATUS OF HYMENOCALLIS CHOCTAWENSIS AND HYMENOCALLIS PUNTAGORDENSIS (AMARYLLIDACEAE) PDF

15 Pages·1996·7.9 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview TAXONOMIC STATUS OF HYMENOCALLIS CHOCTAWENSIS AND HYMENOCALLIS PUNTAGORDENSIS (AMARYLLIDACEAE)

TAXONOMIC OF HYMENOCALLIS STATUS AND HYMENOCALLIS CHOCTAWENSIS PUNTAGORDENSIS (AMARYLLIDACEAE) GERALD SMITH L. Department Biology High Point University, University Station NC High 27262-3398, U.S.A. Point, MARK GARLAND A. Environmental Services of Office Florida Department Environmental Protection of 3900 Commonwealth M.S. 140 Blvd., FL 32399-3000, U.S.A. Tallahassee, Hym and 'awemis nera vez, han sido preparados \ The United have petplexed species of Uymenocallis native to the States m who those have tried to identify either herbarium specimens or plants the The puzzlement, at least in part, due to the lack of a compre- field. is hensive modern treatment that deals with the myriad of published spider- Wooten names and establishes distinctive species concepts. Godfrey and lily emphasized the need quality herbarium vouchers of native popu- (1979) for lations throughout the southeastern United States and for published infor- Such mation about the characteristics of the plants in the wild. informa- would treatment emphasizing tion provide the basis for a fie recognizable on herbarium specin ires . on selected species q{ Hynmiocallis that were based on herbarium, and field, cytological data. This approach was successful in defining the species un- der study and holds promise clarifying the taxonomy of many of the fiDr southeastern Hymenocallis species. Traub (1962) published a key to the species oi Hymenocallis but unfortu- nately provided nomenclatural background concerning chosen little his names or information about the plants they would be found growing as in the wild. His treatment did not deal with number of published names a such as Hymenocallis crassijolia Herb, and H. liriosme (Raf Shinners, and we ) can only conclude that he considered them synonyms names. or invalid However, Traub did have a large greenhouse collection of and spider-lilies, he displayed remarkable a ability to recognize different species of Hymenocallis Traub's understanding of native southeastern was spider-lilies consider- ably enhanced by the field endeavors of Mary G. Henry (Henry 1950; Traub Driven by 1962). her devoted chauffeur, Ernest Perks, in a Cadillac outfitted with oversized and redesigned and tires for field travel for collecting plants recording Henry field observations, JMrs. acquired an extensive bulb collec- tion. She often prepared herbarium vouchers from the populations from which she acquired bulb sample. Mrs. Henry Traub a sent bulbs of each collection so that he could cultivate them, bring them into flower, and When view the specimens firsthand. Traub recognized a distinctiveness of form some new in of these collections, he described species. Traub (1962) new published species oi Hymenocallis based on Mary G. Henry five collec- Traub on Walter and tions. also relied Flory his students the Blandy S. at Experimental Farm of the University of Virginia for cytological informa- Hymenocallis choctawensis Traub Hymenocallis choctawensis one of the species that Traub 962) described is ( 1 from made An a collection by Mrs. Henry. investigation has led us to con- clude firmly that Hymenocallis dominant ground choctaivensis a cover spe- is cies along river systems of the Florida panhandle from the Apalachicola River westward southeastern to Mississippi. 1984 made In the authors pressed and living collections of Hymenocallis a along a tributary of the Choctawhat chee River Walton County, in Florida. This population appeared most sm^ specimens iilar to in the Florida State University herbarium identified as H. caroliniana (L.) Herb. Hymenocallis caroliniana was reported to have chroinosome numbers of 2« = 52 54 or (Flory we 1975, 1976), so expected that we would determine numbers from these ' our collection. Instead, the author established that the somatic first ; Smith and Garland, Hymenocallis (Amaryllidaceae) ^07 number of our collection was 2« = 44, and the karyotype exhibited 36 two- armed and chromosomes The 8 telocentric (Fig. identity of this collec- 1). now with what had been H. seemed remote because tion called caroliniana 2w = 44 had also been reported Hymenocallh coronaria (J.Le Conte) Kunth, iox: examined Schmidhauser and but collections cytologically by (1954) Joye and Smith (1993) revealed 32 two-armed and 12 telocentric chromosomes Our from known in this species. collection thus appeared to differ all other specits.o( Hymenocallis. In examining names used for Hymenocallis in the western Florida pan- we Mary handle, discovered that Traub had proposed H. choctawensis for a G. made Henry collection. Henry's field diaries, available to the authors JVIrs. by her daughter, Josephine deN. Henry, revealed that the type bulb collec- tion was made along a tributary of the Choctawhatchee River in Walton Our County, very near our collection. specimens were similar morphologi- MO: most our specimens and cally to the type of H. choctawensis at notably, the type possessed oblanceolate leaves, rhizomatous bulbs, long-spreading perianth segments and triangular bracts that are not long-tapering. We many concluded that our collection, as well as of the specimens filed We made as H. caroliniana at FSU, were specimens of H, choctawensis. field number where had been and of "H. caroliniana" collected trips to a sites gathered bulbs and vouchers. Angus Gholson of Chattahoochee, Florida, we chromosome number and also sent bulbs. Eventually determined the was karyotype of several of these populations (Table It gratifying to see 1). we number from had H. the 2/z=44 repeatedly collections that identified as arm mea- on morphological grounds. Based on comparisons of choctawensis we surements from prepared from several different collections, ob- figures chromosome served uniformity in both the two-armed and telocentric types. The measurements below were taken from pressed, dried herbarium speci- mens with the exceptions of the seed and fruit dimensions, which were made came from by the authors. All qualitative information observations greenhouse. of plants in the field or cultivated in the Hymenocallis choctawensis Traub, Plant Life 18:70. 1962. (Fig. Typl: 2). UNITED Mary STATES. Florida: Walton Co.: from bulbs coUecced by Mrs. G. MO! 263 TRA). Henry, specimen Trcuh + b (iiolotyfe: ex ./ 3-6 X 2-5 cm, neck 2-8 cm, Bulb rhizomatous, ovoid subglobose, to upward basal plate 1.5-5 cm; tunica gray-brown. Leaves 5-9, arching to suberect, shiny green, oblanceolate, channeled proximally, blade gradually dm x 2.5-6 cm, apex tapering towards the base, 3.5-7.5(-8.5) coriaceous, dm, acute. Scape 3.5-6.2 two-edged, glaucous; 2 or 3 scape bracts enclosing B I>Mi ll»»lll»W jimoMat ii I cm mm; x 15-20 the buds, 3-4.5(-6) each flower with subtending a mm. x 10-15 bracteole, 2.8-3.7 Flowers 2-8(-12), opening sequentially, highly fragrant; perianth segments slightly ascending to spreading, white, cm mm; tinged green on and 8-12 x 5-9 keel at base, perianth tube green, 7-11 cm; staminal cup white with small yellow-green funnelform, eye, gradually spreading, shortly tubulose below, 2.5-4 X 4-5 cm; margin ir- regularly bi-or tridentate, projections not prominent between the free fila- ments; free filaments suberect, inserted on a depression, white, 2.5-4 cm, anthers 1.5-2.5 cm, pollen golden; style green in distal half, fading into mm; white proximally, 13-18 cm; ovary ovoid, 10-15 X 5-10 ovules 1-3 per locule. Fruit broadly trigonous to subglobose, 3-4 x cm. obovoid 3 Seeds to elongated, 2-3(-4) x 1.4-2.3 cm. Somatic chromosome number 2«=44. Slough, F y panhandle choctawenm Traub, the Florida spider-lily, dis- Hymenocallis is tributed westward from the Apalachicola River and its tributaries to the northward lower Pascagoula River in southern Mississippi. It extends into southern Alabama and southwestern Georgia (Fig. Flowering time, as ob- 3). served and documented from herbarium sheets, occurs from spring to early summer. Distinguishing characteristics are rhizomatous bulbs, large, oblan- The green and showy long, white peri- ceolate, shiny leaves, inflorescences. anth segments that spread from the base of the funnelform staminal cup at right angles to the axis are especially distinctive characteristics. floral The rhizomes developing from the bulbs are tubular propagators arising Dense horizontally from the upper region of the basal plate. colonial stands The form of vigorous rhizome production. presence or absence of as a result these structures have been reported previously by Small (1933), Sealy (1954), Herndon and (1987). dominant ground on found cover the the Hymenocallis as choctaivensis is banks spring-run, and blackwater streams, and in the floodplain of alluvial, swamps These dominated by canopy and floodplain beyond. areas are a forests Carya of Taxodium dutichum Rich., Acer rubrum L,, Nyssa aquatica L., (L.) aquatica (Michx. f Nutt., M^^«o/z^ virgmtana L. var. australis Sarg., Quercus ) Liquidambar Michx., lyrata Walt., Q. nigra L., styraciflua L., laurifolia Q. Nutt. Ulmiis americana L., Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh., Celtis laevigata and Pinus Engelm. Small trees include Gleditsia aquatica Marsh., elltotttt K. Koch, Carpinus carolimana Walt., Cornus foemina Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) and Planera aquatica]. Gmel. Shrubs occasionally observed were Mill., F. Wait, Cephalanthus occidentalis L., Crataegus viridis L., Ilex decidua Cyrilla nudum Viburnum obovatum Walt., V. L., Itea virginica L., racemiflora L., Hypericum Lam., Vaccinium Sebastiama fruticosa (Bartr.) Fern., galioides corymbosum Arundinaria gigantea (Walt.) Muhl., and Sabal minor acq.) L., (J Woody observed were Campsis radicans Seem, ex Bureau, vines (L.) Pers. ^ J--'- ' -^^ 100 1 Koehne, loxuoduubon Kuntze, Lotmera (L yadiuins (L ciyborea A///pcio/>\/\ ) ) Thunb and Ijpouna Bu/miithia ouihi (Walt Shinners, Vitn spp S)iiilax ) , , and C sp With// are herbs such as species of C^^ex sp[-) A?;/^/;/! i/m/^//^6/'/'i/> Unh\ WiUd C exKun/e, C inckidinuC t^//i-a>M/Shuttlew supata ex , (Lamb day, /v/M/ Hailo, FtmbriU)ln spp Rhymhospoya torniudala /;// ., ) , Gmel P spp Junius sp Wuranthemum innhyuMim F Blake, Lobe- iiUkI! (J ) , , Urban mala (Walt Lindau var Lmceolata sp \/././"sp jiistuui in l,j ) , W , & hapm R Long, Zuaniopsn vuluuea (Michx Doell, Asch Asd- (C ) ) , & Cham ptHNun Walt Hypuphila latusUn (Schlecht Hypoxia sp cpjas ) , , Michx L Nces, Polygoiu/m sp Sagittarui ^uinnnea Pontederia cotdata , , , L (Matr spp AltDiiantheta philoxuo?des Ciiiseb Cypcu/\ Sa?/tjnrn iernmis ) , , , hngelm Lyiumu anmnanu))! L paMifhnus Raf ,Sai)U)lu\ Aljflio;/* ;;?^rrajy;(?r/^/:^ , , Sw L Owimida Wooduaydia aimlata (L Moore, ly^odiiim faponu/nn regalia ) , , L and sp Orontiiim aqaatiLiivi \[y)/ophyll/nii , USA ALABAMA Co specimens examined BaldvMii Hisrniic Blakelv Representative (UWt Bdkc (GA) SR-201 iwa> ( f NW Garland 1650 (FSU). Okaloosa Co.: Yellow River, of Crestview, May 974, Godfr, 1 1 1 N 73583 (FSU). Walton Co.: scream of Red Bay on SR-81, 8 May 1959, first Goclfre 58607 (FSU); mi SE of Knox Hill along Choctawhatchee Rwer, May ca. 3 983, Wilhel> 5 1 1 N 11384 (USF). Washington Co.: ca. 2 mi of Caryville, 10 May 1974, Godfrey 735 L (FSU, IBE), H most Hymenocallis choctawensis often misidentified in herbaria is as [=H. occidentalis caroltmana of authors, not Herb.] (Smith 1991) (L.) et al. may also be confused with Hymenocallis which found It duvalensis, alon^ is floodplains in the Florida panhandle from the upper Ochlockonee Rive north into Georgia and east across northern Florida. The following key wil allow one distinguish to these taxa: dm cm 3.5-7.5(-8.5) long, 2.5-6 wide. Hymenocallis puntagordensis Traub Another Hymenocallis species whose identity has been obscure H. is puntagordensis Traub (Smith et al. 1994). Traub (1962) based this species on plants he grew from bulbs collected by C.L. Burlingham Punta Gorda, in A Florida. critical examination of the type specimen and a thorough analy- sis of the original description led to the conclusion that this entity was distinctive and worthy of species status. However, was perplexing that it loans from Florida's major herbaria (FLAS, FSU, FTG, USF) included no specimens that seemed match Traub to entity. 's August we In 199.3 and again in 1995 observed Hymenocallis around Punta Gorda with many-flowered on inflorescences robust, glaucous scapes, and with 5—8 coriaceous, shiny green, strap-shaped The most leaves. strik- ing features were their small, funnelform staminal cups with distinctive marginal projections. These specimens were similar in both quantitative and qualitative characters to the type of H. puntagordensis. & Our original collection. Smith Garland 1625, and the type shared also same chromosome the number, 2« = 46 Smith (Flory 1976; et 1994). al. However, the karyotype of the type collection was unknown. From our collection, the author prepared karyotype showed 34 two-armed first a that and chromosomes One 12 telocentric (Fig. of the chro- 4). ! largest pair showed a distinct satellite on the short arm in vhich chromosome was From this clearly observable. the all 5^ A tMHHHHMJHMI IHHI w we concluded that our collections information available to us, pnntagordemh. Traub Our with bulb that collections provided us characteristics \ The we examine bulbs documented Hymenocallis puntagordensis for . ovoid, with an elongated neck and a chestnut- Hymenocallis puntagordensis Traub, Plant Life 18:71. 1962. (Fig. 5). UNITED STATES. Florida: Charlotte Co.: from bulbs collected by C.L. Type: 5-8 X 2-4.5 cm, neck long, (5-)8-12 cm, Bulb nonrhizomatous, ovoid, 1-2 cm; tunica dark-brown. Leaves 5-8, evergreen, suberect, basal plate dm X channeled proximally, 3.5-7.5 narrowly strap-shaped, shiny green, 5-6 dm, two- 1.5-3 cm, highly coriaceous, apex acute. Scape distinctly cm 4-6 X edged, glaucous; two scape bracts enclosing the buds, ca. 15

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.