ebook img

Speaking with an Accent in Northern Japan: Discrimination and Dialect Ideologies PDF

229 Pages·2017·18.27 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Speaking with an Accent in Northern Japan: Discrimination and Dialect Ideologies

UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Speaking with an Accent in Northern Japan: Discrimination and Dialect Ideologies Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9888279n Author Everhart, Edwin Keely Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Speaking with an Accent in Northern Japan: Discrimination and Dialect Ideologies A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Edwin Keely Everhart 2018 © Copyright by Edwin Keely Everhart 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Speaking with an Accent in Northern Japan: Discrimination and Dialect Ideologies by Edwin Keely Everhart Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Paul V Kroskrity, Chair This dissertation investigates the practices by which local language activists and college students in the Touhoku (Tōhoku 東北) region reproduce and challenge stigma toward local language (“dialect,” “accent”). Touhoku has for decades been a source of labor and other resources for the national economy of Japan which favors the urban core, and language standardization reinscribes Touhoku speakers as belonging to a periphery. People of this region, subject to metropolitan cultural hegemony in the post-war period, often came to bear an inferiority complex about local culture due to linguistic discrimination and cultural marginalization. Registers of local language here tend to absorb weighty meaning from social relations of power, as emblems of shameful backwardness, tourist appeal, political resistance, and fashionable authenticity by turns. Following the last “dialect boom” (1980s-90s), local language activists (“dialect activists”) have pursued projects of language documentation, language valorization, and language revitalization in a spirit of renewal after the triple disasters of March 11, 2011. Meanwhile institutions like media and ii schools, which the state set up to privilege national “standard” language (i.e. Tokyo-style language), have never been decolonized. This dissertation is based on 16 months of ethnographic research primarily in Morioka, Iwate Prefecture, with college students at Iwate University, as well as with language activists, drawing on established approaches in linguistic anthropology and sociolinguistics. It draws together a range of approaches to analyze language varieties as registers, that is, as products of enregisterment. Part of this dissertation addresses language activism e.g. in the case of Kesen and Yamáura Harutíğu (Yamaura Harutsugu). In addition to discussing such language activism (largely among elders), this study asks how young people in northern Touhoku experience local language: what are their language ideologies vis-à-vis local language, how do they express social identities using linguistic resources, and how is their agency to use language constrained? People in northern Touhoku are experiencing a form of language endangerment, but local language is by no means “extinct,” though commoditization and linguistic colonization are dominant forces. Analysis of life histories and everyday interaction demonstrate that speakers use local language as a resource for negotiating cultural authority. iii The dissertation of Edwin Keely Everhart is approved. Mariko Tamanoi Katsuya Hirano Norma Mendoza-Denton Paul V Kroskrity, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2018 iv 松本源蔵氏と、多くの北東北の方言活動家の皆さんに v Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. x PERSONAL NAMES ........................................................................................................................... xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................... xii VITA ......................................................................................................................................................... xvi CHAPTER ONE: Introduction. .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Linguistic colonization and Touhoku history .............................................................................. 1 1.1.1 History of linguistic difference ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Standardization debates .................................................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Linguistic colonization in the present .......................................................................... 6 1.2 Theoretical approaches to linguistic discrimination in linguistic anthropology ............................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Research in linguistic discrimination ............................................................................ 10 1.2.1.1 Value ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1.2 Style ................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Toward a comprehensive concept of linguistic discrimination ................................ 16 1.2.2.1 General tools ................................................................................................... 21 1.2.2.2 Language shift and maintenance .................................................................. 23 1.2.2.3 Linguistic racism ............................................................................................. 24 1.2.3 Defining linguistic discrimination ................................................................................. 25 1.2.3.1 Proposed definition of linguistic discrimination ........................................ 27 1.2.4 Broader applications ........................................................................................................ 28 1.2.4.1 Potential usefulness of a comprehensive notion of linguistic discrimination ............................................................................ 29 1.2.5 Linguistic discrimination in Japan ................................................................................. 30 1.2.5.1 Language attitudes and language politics .................................................... 31 1.2.5.2 Discrimination ................................................................................................. 32 1.2.5.3 Potential applications of linguistic discrimination research in Japanese contexts ....................................................................................... 35 1.2.6 On variety and enregisterment ...................................................................................... 37 1.3 Metapragmatics of this dissertation ............................................................................................... 40 1.3.1 Romanization ................................................................................................................... 40 1.3.2 Preferred terms ................................................................................................................ 41 1.4 Research methods ............................................................................................................................ 43 1.4.1 Maps .................................................................................................................................. 45 1.4.2 With language activists .................................................................................................... 46 1.4.3 With university students ................................................................................................. 47 1.4.4 Observer effects ............................................................................................................... 49 1.5 Chapters of this dissertation ........................................................................................................... 51 1.5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 51 vi 1.5.2 Local Language Activism in Touhoku: Revitalization Practices and Preservation Ideologies ................................................. 51 1.5.3 Metalinguistic Discourse Among Iwate University Students ................................... 52 1.5.4 Students’ Lingual Life Histories: Identity, Agency, Alienation ................................ 52 1.5.5 Kesen, Independence, and Yamáura Harutíğu: A Final Case of Language Activism ............................................................................. 52 CHAPTER TWO: Local Language Activism in Touhoku: Revitalization Practices and Preservation Ideologies ........................................................................ 53 2.1 Linguistic diversity and movement toward standardization ...................................................... 53 2.2 Reaction to standardization: local language activism .................................................................. 59 2.2.1 Unexpected success of standardization ........................................................................ 59 2.2.2 Metropolitan desire for the authentic periphery ......................................................... 59 2.2.3 Prestigious registers of local language .......................................................................... 60 2.2.4 Resistance to standardization ........ ............................................................................... 60 2.3 Local language activists: individuals.............. ................................................................................ 62 2.3.1 Imoto................................................ ................................................................................. 62 2.3.2 Osima................................................ ................................................................................ 65 2.4 Local language activists: groups.................... .. ............................................................................... 68 2.4.1 Nanbu summit................................ .. ............................................................................... 70 2.4.2 Activists’ ideologies of local language .......................................................................... 73 2.4.2.1 Ambivalent evaluation of local language ..................................................... 73 2.4.2.2 Mitigated foreboding...... ................................................................................ 74 2.4.2.3 Seriousness and fun in language activism ................................................... 77 2.4.2.4 Staying distinct from standard language ...................................................... 81 2.5 Limits to valorization........................... ............................................................................................ 84 CHAPTER THREE: Metalinguistic Discourse Among University Students....... ........................................................................................................... 91 3.1 Uncertainty and enregisterment ..................................................................................................... 91 3.1.1 Terms for national “standard” language ...................................................................... 91 3.1.2 Enregisterment in interaction ........................................................................................ 99 3.2 Scale and imaginaries ....................................................................................................................... 105 3.2.1 Emic concept categories ................................................................................................. 105 3.2.2 Scales. . .............................................................................................................................. 109 3.3 Idealized temporality. ....................................................................................................................... 113 3.4 Immediate practicality. ..................................................................................................................... 121 3.5 Ideologies of local language: additonal considerations. .............................................................. 126 CHAPTER FOUR: Students’ Lingual Life Histories: Identity, Agency, Alienation. ................................................................................................................ 128 4.1 Sawada. ............................................................................................................................................... 128 4.1.1 Sawada: home town and family. .................................................................................... 130 4.1.2 Sawada: at school. ............................................................................................................ 132 4.2 Narita. ................................................................................................................................................. 141 4.2.1 Narita: observations. ....................................................................................................... 142 4.2.2 Narita: in his own words. ............................................................................................... 144 vii 4.2.3 Narita: a fuller picture. .................................................................................................... 147 4.3 Kumagai. ............................................................................................................................................ 150 4.3.1 Kumagai: being accented. ............................................................................................... 151 4.3.2 Kumagai: alienation. ........................................................................................................ 158 4.4 Hatori. ................................................................................................................................................ 159 4.5 Lingual life histories and linguistic personae. ............................................................................... 164 CHAPTER FIVE: Kesen, Independence, and Yamáura Harutíğu: A Final Case of Language Activism. .................................................................................................... 167 5.1 Yamáura: early life. ........................................................................................................................... 168 5.2 Possible inspirations. ........................................................................................................................ 169 5.3 Projects based in Kesen. .................................................................................................................. 170 5.4 Economic decline and new strategies. .......................................................................................... 173 5.5 Theatre Kesen after 2015. ............................................................................................................... 175 5.6 Conclusion. ........................................................................................................................................ 178 5.6.1 Analyzing linguistic discrimination. .............................................................................. 178 5.6.1 On varieties, registers, ideologies, and users of language. ......................................... 180 END NOTES ......................................................................................................................................... 181 WORKS CITED .................................................................................................................................... 194 viii

Description:
The dissertation of Edwin Keely Everhart is approved. their own linguistic chops, and for some it is an important tool for crafting their social
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.