Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2015 Ranking Small Business Resistance Criteria Toward the Affordable Care Act Rakesh M K Gupta Walden University Follow this and additional works at:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of theFinance and Financial Management Commons, and theHealth and Medical Administration Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral study by Rakesh Gupta has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Christos Makrigeorgis, Committee Chairperson, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Thomas Schaefer, Committee Member, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Steve Roussas, University Reviewer, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2015 Abstract Ranking Small Business Resistance Criteria Toward the Affordable Care Act by Rakesh Mike Kumar Gupta MBA, Strayer University, 2008 Post-Graduate Diploma in Computer Science, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1974 MSc, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1970 BSc, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1968 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Walden University August 2015 Abstract Following the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, politicians, media, and lobbyists rendered a number of conflicting and confusing interpretations of its merits and demerits. Such interpretations intensified the skepticism and concerns of small business enterprise (SBE) owners. The purpose of this study was to develop a representative, prioritized list of SBE owners’ concerns or resistance factors. The goal was to create a useful guide for SBE owners who are seeking ways to reducing the adverse financial impact of the law. With social choice theory as the theoretical framework, 50 randomly selected SBE owners across 5 distinct industry groups from Richmond, Virginia, participated in an online, cross-sectional, pairwise comparison survey. The overall results of an analytic hierarchy process indicated that the top-ranked resistance factor of SBE owners was insurance premiums, followed by quality of care and the tax burden. However, these rankings were not uniform among industry groups. With a focus on these crucial concerns, SBE owners could benefit by seeking approaches to reduce the business costs of health care. The implications for positive social change include the potential for business organizations, researchers, and policymakers to channel SBE owners’ voice for a socioeconomic growth by addressing their concerns in seeking improvements from the ACA. Ranking Small Business Resistance Criteria Toward the Affordable Care Act by Rakesh Mike Kumar Gupta MBA, Strayer University, 2008 Post-Graduate Diploma in Computer Science, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1974 MSc, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1970 BSc, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 1968 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Walden University August 2015 Dedication To those, striving to reach puberty of their soul (Dr. Asha Mishra). I reached this pinnacle of my life with the strength and support of many. I elicited inspiration from Sant Kabir Das, Pope Francis, President Barack Obama, President Nelson Mandela, and Prime Ministers Indira Gandhi and Narendra Modi. My dedication is for their vision and guiding light of social change. Acknowledgments I am thankful to my doctoral committee chaired by Dr. Christos Makrigeorgis and supported by Dr. Thomas Schaefer and Dr. Steve Roussas. Dr. Makrigeorgis provided superb leadership, guidance, and expertise throughout the arduous research tasks of the doctoral study. Dr. Reginald Taylor evaluated the research work as a methodologist. Dr. Freda Turner, DBA program director, and Walden University staff provided excellent program support. Al Sabado contributed her proficient editing skills. Dr. Hari Sharma filled the role of my extreme coach. I acknowledge the support of IAVA led by Dr. Dhakar; CCI, Pramod Amin and the core team; HCV, Sanjay and Rambabu; and SACVI, Bhai Sahib. Westend Indies led by Elliott; Tennis Maniacs, Anil; Sargam, Manju dee; WeSargam, Probodh; and Richmond Strings, Naveen C and Naveen V formed a part of my support group. I also thank AA, Adish, Neil, Omprakash, Simon, Izak, Marianna, Aimable, Spence, Saravanan, Debra, Samy, Venkat, Sridhar, Jey, Selva, Mahesh, Ravi, Sathiya S, Sathiya T, Shekhar, G Venkat, Gopal, Anu, and friends and coworkers at Federal Reserve Board (FRB). FRB provided the encouragement, support, and academic assistance, I needed. I sorely miss Loga. I thank Mata Parivar led by the Anands; Mata Chowki, the Sappals; Golden Boys, Ram; Vaish Samaj, Sanjay; and international group of friends. My thanks also go to Kannada-, Tamil-, Telugu-, Punjabi-, Sindhi-, Marathi-, Gujarati-, Bengali-, Malayali-, Hindi-, and Urdu-speaking group of friends. Finally, I profoundly, profusely, and proudly thank my parents and my family—Usha, Ritija, Himanshu, and Aparna—for their sacrifices. Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Section 1: Foundation of the Study ......................................................................................1 Background of the Problem ...........................................................................................1 Problem Statement .........................................................................................................3 Purpose Statement ..........................................................................................................4 Nature of the Study ........................................................................................................4 Research Question .........................................................................................................6 Hypotheses .....................................................................................................................6 Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................8 Operational Definitions ..................................................................................................9 Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations ..............................................................10 Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 10 Limitations ............................................................................................................ 13 Delimitations ......................................................................................................... 13 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................14 Contribution to Business Practice ......................................................................... 14 Implications for Social Change ............................................................................. 15 A Review of the Professional and Academic Literature ..............................................16 Literature Search Process ...................................................................................... 17 Theme 1: Health Care Reform and the Affordable Care Act ............................... 18 i Theme 2: Small Business and the Affordable Care Act ....................................... 35 Theme 3: Analytic Hierarchy Process .................................................................. 52 Transition .....................................................................................................................66 Section 2: The Project ........................................................................................................68 Purpose Statement ........................................................................................................68 Role of the Researcher .................................................................................................69 Participants ...................................................................................................................70 Research Method and Design ......................................................................................70 Research Method .................................................................................................. 71 Research Design.................................................................................................... 81 Population and Sampling .............................................................................................86 Ethical Research...........................................................................................................89 Data Collection Instruments ........................................................................................90 Data Collection Technique ..........................................................................................93 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................102 Study Validity ............................................................................................................108 Transition and Summary ............................................................................................109 Section 3: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Change ................110 Introduction ................................................................................................................110 Presentation of the Findings.......................................................................................111 Analysis of a Sample Response .......................................................................... 114 Synthesis of a Sample Response ......................................................................... 116 ii Results of Data Analysis ..................................................................................... 117 Discussion of the Findings .................................................................................. 126 Summary ............................................................................................................. 138 Applications to Professional Practice ........................................................................139 Implications for Social Change ..................................................................................139 Recommendations for Action ....................................................................................140 Recommendations for Further Research ....................................................................141 Reflections .................................................................................................................141 Summary and Study Conclusions ..............................................................................142 References ........................................................................................................................144 Appendix A: SBE Owners’ Resistance Survey ...............................................................167 Appendix B: Saaty Permission License ...........................................................................175 Appendix C: Permission Letter from Dr. Goepel ............................................................179 Appendix D: Ishizaka Permission License ......................................................................180 Appendix E: Aull-Hyde Permission License ...................................................................187 Appendix F: Aggregated Local Priorities by Industry Groups ........................................194 Appendix G. Synthesis of Aggregated Priorities by Industry Groups .............................198 iii
Description: