ebook img

Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy PDF

25 Pages·2009·0.37 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy

ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Putting the Altruism AR Further Click here for quick links to Back into Altruism: Annual Reviews content online, including: • Other articles in this volume The Evolution of Empathy g or • Top cited articles s. • Top downloaded articles w e • AR’s comprehensive search nnualrevie only. FLivrinagnLsinBks,.YMerk.esdNeatiWonalaParilmateResearchCenter,andPsychologyDepartment, as als.al u EmoryUniversity,Atlanta,Georgia30322;email:[email protected] nn m arjouror perso oF d fr09. nloade10/06/ wn oo 00. DAMI Annu.Rev.Psychol.2008.59:279–300 KeyWords 79-3F MI FirstpublishedonlineasaReviewinAdvanceon perception-action,perspective-taking,prosocialbehavior, 59:2Y O June5,2007 cooperation 8.T 200RSI hTthtpe:/A/npnsyucahl.RanevniuewalroefvPiesywchs.oolorggyisonlineat Abstract ol. VE chNI Thisarticle’sdoi: Evolutionary theory postulates that altruistic behavior evolved for ev. Psyby U 1C0o.p11yr4i6g/hatn(cid:2)ncur2e0v0.p8sybcyhA.5n9n.1u0al3R00e6v.i0e9w3s6.25 tahmeorettivuartnio-bneanlerfioltes,ithboewaervsethr,etpheeryfonremedert.oFboererxeptuerrnie-nbceendefibtystthoepolary- u. R Allrightsreserved ganism.Motivationalanalysesshouldrestrictthemselves,therefore, n n 0066-4308/08/0203-0279$20.00 to the altruistic impulse and its knowable consequences. Empathy A is an ideal candidate mechanism to underlie so-called directed al- truism,i.e.,altruisminresponsetoanother’spain,need,ordistress. Evidenceisaccumulatingthatthismechanismisphylogeneticallyan- cient,probablyasoldasmammalsandbirds.Perceptionoftheemo- tionalstateofanotherautomaticallyactivatessharedrepresentations causingamatchingemotionalstateintheobserver.Withincreasing cognition,state-matchingevolvedintomorecomplexforms,includ- ingconcernfortheotherandperspective-taking.Empathy-induced altruismderivesitsstrengthfromtheemotionalstakeitoffersthe selfintheother’swelfare.Thedynamicsoftheempathymechanism agree with predictions from kin selection and reciprocal altruism theory. 279 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 “Youbeginwiththeeffectofbehavioronac- Contents torsandrecipients;youdealwiththeproblem of internal motivation, which is a secondary INTRODUCTION................. 280 problem,afterward....[I]fyoustartwithmo- ORIGINOFEMPATHY............ 282 tivation, you have given up the evolutionary LEVELSOFEMPATHY........... 282 analysisattheoutset.” EmotionalContagion............. 282 Thisisaperfectlylegitimatestrategythat SympatheticConcern............. 283 has yielded profound insights into the evo- EmpathicPerspective-Taking..... 285 lutionofaltruism(e.g.,Dugatkin2006).Un- UNDERLYINGMECHANISMS... 286 fortunately,however,theseinsightshavenot PerceptionActionMechanism.... 286 come with a new terminology: Evolutionary RussianDollModel.............. 287 biologypersistsinusingmotivationalterms. ws.org FROALMTREUMIPSAMTH..Y..T..O............... 288 Thus, an action is called “selfish” regard- e less of whether or not the actor deliberately vi EmotionalContagion............. 288 nnualree only. SEymmppaaththicetPicerCspoenccteirvne-.T.a.k..in..g........... 228899 sceaellkesdb“eanlterfiutisstfiocr”iitfseiltf.bSeinmeifilatsrlay,raenciapciteinotnaist m arjournals.aor personal us ECMOPDNPRIACROTLEXHUCIYMTSIAEAOSTDNEEAV.ML.O.TE.LR.CV.U.HE.I.DAS.MN..I..S..M......O....F.. 229912 anTstoihcntoegstshtpaertnooatioctnthttoyerrpuiadiccneattrloe—ranldsrtareeucgdriasitrfitodcilisebnseagsnhhoeeofifrntwleithyfhebeetethoeoetprthhreooarr-t. wnloaded fron 10/06/09. F Sympathy...cannot,inanysense,be tmateegcnoettrioetmhfleeitkhsheecilovytneea—flrgmigcesrtvsee“swnsseiitvtlfihheostthhuh”geaihanrnvhbdeeerr“nnamiagltcnoruu.tliiaTvsrathimtciio”senauonsfi---s oo 79-300. DF MIAMI Empathy mayrebgearduendiqaSusmealyitshewl(fie1sl7lh5sp9ur,iitpne.cd3ip1flo7er). ionggyT(bShyoebeehvrioj&alucktWiionniglasrooynfb1mi9oo9lto8igv).aisttisonhaalstbeeremninuonl-- 59:2Y O Altruism bridgingthegapbetweenegoismandaltru- helpfulforcommunicationaboutmotivation ol. 2008.VERSIT (dbbeeihfioanlvoiitgoiiorcntah)l:at iasnmo,thsienrcpeeitrshoans’tshmeipsrfooprteurntyeoinfttroaonnsfeo’srmowinng ptoerdose.wThahteTwriavyertsodcildeawrhuepnthheedceocnifduesdiotnhaist chNI increasesthe feelingofdistress. evolutionary analyses require that effects be ev. Psyby U rceocsitptioentht’sefitnessata Hoffman(1981a,p.133) cvoernsseildye,rmedotsievpaatiroantealfraonmalymseostirveaqtuioirne. uCsonto- R performers u. keep motivation separate from evolutionary n Ultimatecauseor INTRODUCTION n considerations.Itisnotfornothingthatbiol- A goal: thebenefitsan Discussionsofaltruisticbehaviortendtosuf- ogistshammeronthedistinctionbetweenul- organismoritsclose kinderivefroma ferfromalackofdistinctionbetweenfunction timateandproximate(Mayr1961,Tinbergen behavior,hencethe andmotivation.Thisisduetothecontrasting 1963). The ultimate cause refers to why a probablereasonwhy emphasisofbiologistsandpsychologists,with behavior evolved over thousands of gener- thebehaviorwas theformerfocusingonwhataparticularbe- ations, which depends on its fitness conse- favoredbynatural havior is good for, and the latter on how it quences. The proximate cause, on the other selection comesabout. hand, refers to the immediate situation that Proximatecause: Evolutionaryexplanationsarebuiltaround triggers behavior, and the role of learning, situationthat triggersbehaviorand theprinciplethatallthatnaturalselectioncan physiology, and neural processes—typically themechanism workwitharetheeffectsofbehavior—notthe thedomainofpsychologists. (psychological, motivationbehindit.Thismeansthereisonly Proximateandultimateviewpointsdoin- neural,physiological) onelogicalstartingpointforevolutionaryac- form each other, yet are not to be con- thatenablesit counts, as explained by Trivers (2002, p. 6): flated. For example, primate cooperation is 280 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 promotedbysocialtolerance.Throughitsef- trinsically rewarding qualities in that it of- fectonfood-sharing,toleranceevensoutpay- fers the actor an emotional stake in the re- offdistributions(deWaal&Davis2003,Melis cipient’swell-being,i.e.,ifhelpingtheother Directedaltruism: et al. 2006). Tolerance likely is a proximate ameliorates the helper’s internal state (see helpingor mechanismthatevolvedtoservetheultimate Empathy as Evolved Proximate Mechanism, comfortingbehavior goalofcooperation,whichistoyieldbenefits below).Extrinsicrewards,ontheotherhand, directedatan forallcontributors. arelesslikelytoplayarole.Bydefinition,al- individualinneed, pain,ordistress Cooperation and altruistic behavior are truismcarriesaninitialcost,andpositivecon- thoughttohaveevolvedtohelpfamilymem- sequencesoccuronlyafterasignificanttime Intentional altruism: the bers and those inclined to return the favor interval (e.g., the recipient reciprocates) or altruistdeliberately (Hamilton1964,Trivers1971).Regardlessof notatall(e.g.,carefordependentkin),making seekstobenefit g whetherthisisthewholeexplanationornot forratherpoorlearningconditions. eithertheother s.or (see Sober & DS Wilson 1998, EO Wilson Intentionally selfish altruism would re- (intentionally ew 2005), the point is that ultimate accounts quire the actor to explicitly expect others to altruisticaltruism)or vi itself(intentionally nnualree only. sqtureensscerseftourrtnh-ebpenereffiotrsm, eir.ea.n,dp/oorsiittisvkeinc.oInnsaes-- rfoetrusrunchtheexfpaevcotra.tDioensspiinteatnhiemlaalcsk,tohfeeyvaidreenocfe- sEemlfipshatahltyr-ubiasmse)d m arjournals.aor personal us mhisfiodauwencryeh,vmtaehsore,rtyiehtepcislslaeouysb.neTelcynlheewiafisrhtbsawetmhcdoaarmtyivmebessoectdqlieivuraaeirttcieiotfendwdeaellaarlcytoorelnude--,, tat(eehr.neagta.t,shasenDuimomanwealdklys.inTtcrsauhrle1ey9coa7albm6tor,muuFitosetnaihcrcrelsap&irmeectiutFehrisans,ct-shhbibneuancmceehafianetlrssl aceaanmltroreptuahbitesohmrryn:wfhritoehmlpand wnloaded fron 10/06/09. F inisnemew,dhi,.iepc.ha,iandl,itrroeurcistdetiidcstabrleetshrsua.ivsTimohremarieamyaercdeoamttheoretahebeowrusatyi:ns 2stwht0riat0uht3e,saanKriefmaucglialpalnrsaop2ecp0nitr0gye0acag,isaeStaiiloiknmneorotteifcavilahp.tor2ioow0cn0a.i5ltI)t,ewxmaicslishlsuacumnoltgneie--s Ecathafmfpeeacpectmaiettdoyhtbytiooy:n(ataahn)ledsbtseahtaere 79-300. DoF MIAMI o 1. ttAeolrtberesutgiesgdtiinchgeimolprpidnuiglsstear.ensSdspscoiagnrnitnaanlgseoionrutrshe,eadcsitisgiionhn-t md19iaa9tt7eel)sy,eblbfue-tgntaehifinetraterhteueimrnnd.-ebHeedenlecpfiofumtslmoafcotansltf(roDuriusitgmiacmtbkeein-- oto(chft)heaiednrreeo’santshtsoitefanyrt,sew(f,boia)trnhatdshtsheeess 2O ofanotherinpainorneed. ol. 2008.59:VERSITY 2. toLiuoetnacreondmedreesaspfltoorruntishsemer.aecHintofeorl.prcinegdabsyapcoosintidvie- hctioamgveinoirttihvtayetphitcoharelilzyoornrge,amin.aeisi.nm, obciescyuournnsdloiktedhliyestaatonnitmlcyoaniln’-s ooTextrhhtheiesnerr,ddaespdfiebonrespiypttoiieonncngdtivhweihs.at chNI nect them with the original act. This ap- existsinmany yU 3. Intentionalaltruism.Helpbasedonthe ev. Psby prediction of behavioral effects. One pkilniegsdtoomm.ostreciprocalaltruismintheanimal a“nemimpaaltsh,yb”utinththeeterm R prediction could be that the help will presentreview nu. bereciprocated,hencethattheactwill Once evolved, behavior often assumes appliesevenifonly n motivationalautonomy,i.e.,itsmotivationbe- A produce a net benefit. Since the actor criterion(a)ismet comesdisconnectedfromitsultimategoals.A seeks to benefit itself, we may call this Motivational goodexampleissexualbehavior,whicharose autonomy: intentionally selfish altruism. The sec- toservereproduction.Sinceanimalsare,asfar independenceof ondpossibilityishelpbasedonanap- asweknow,unawareofthelinkbetweensex motivationfrom preciation of how one’s own behavior and reproduction, they must be engaging in ultimategoals willhelptheother.Sincetheactorseeks sex(asdohumansmuchofthetime)without tobenefittheother,wemaycallthisin- progenyinmind.Justassexcannotbemoti- tentionallyaltruisticaltruism. vated by unforeseen consequences, altruistic Some directed altruistic behavior is pro- behaviorcannotbemotivatedbyunforeseen moted by built-in rewards, such as the payoffs. oxytocin release during suckling that may Thealtruisticimpulseistobetakenvery underpin maternal care (Panksepp 1998). seriously, therefore, because even if altruis- Empathy-basedaltruismmayhavesimilarin- tic behavior were partially learned based on www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 281 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 short-termintrinsicrewardsorlong-termex- cognition is often critical, it is a secondary trinsicrewards,thisbynomeansrulesoutthe development. As noted by Hoffman (1981b, altruisticimpulse.Infact,itpresupposesthis p.79),“[H]umansmustbeequippedbiologi- Perception-action impulsegiventhatabehavior’sconsequences callytofunctioneffectivelyinmanysocialsit- mechanism(PAM): automaticallyand cannotbelearnedwithoutspontaneouslyen- uations without undue reliance on cognitive unconsciously gaginginitinthefirstplace. processes.” activatedneural This review seeks to restore the altruism The selection pressure to evolve rapid representationsof withinaltruismbyexploringtheroleofem- emotionalconnectednesslikelystartedinthe statesinthesubject pathyinthedirectedaltruismofhumansand context of parental care long before our similartothose perceivedinthe other animals. Some definitions of empathy speciesevolved(Eibl-Eibesfeldt1974[1971], object stressthesharingofemotions,whereasother MacLean1985).Signalingtheirstatethrough g Emotional definitions stress the capacity to put oneself smilingandcrying,humaninfantsurgetheir s.or contagion: intotheother’s“shoes.”Thelatterdefinitions caregiver to come into action (Acebo & ew emotional are so top-down, however, that they discon- Thoman 1995, Bowlby 1958). Equivalent vi state-matchingofa nnualree only. soubbjejeccttwithan nWeectfeomllopwathay bfrootmtomits-upposaspibplreoaacnhteciendsteenatds., mreepcrhoadnuicstmiosnorpeelireasteoninfeaeldlianngi,mcalelsaniningw,hainchd nals.anal us acdluodpitnigngmtehreebermoaodtieosntaplossesnibslietivdietfiyntoitiootnh,eirns-. wpaarremnitnsgaolefrtthteoyoanudnga.fAfevciatendorbymathmemiraloifafn- m arjouror perso Wineafinrismtcaolsnsainddertthheevuanridoeurslyleinvgelspoefrecmepptaiothny- swphroinrge’smnaieneeddsinlidkieflfyereonutt.-reproduced those nloaded fro10/06/09. F aPecxrtpeilsootnorenmt&heecdhreaenlWaitsiamoanl (b(2Pe0At0wM2eae))n. Apefrmtoepproattshheydis,awnbdye caonudOldpnlbcaeye aatphrpeollieeedminopuatththseiidcweictdaheperarcneietaytrwineogxriksctooendft,seoxi-tt wn altruism. cialrelationships.Thefactthatmammalsre- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI iismlaAitkeemlymaetjoocrhhaqnauviseemstsieotloenctgiesednweerhmaetptehaetdhriyreeavcsotelpudrtioaoxln-- tainatidntuhdceiisnctgroensstisgivnnouacelasdl.izsFuaotrirvoinevxasalinmvtapolluaeed,upolrtfhimeomoatdpeahstihnoyft--s 2O 59:Y truism. Does empathy channel altruism in tenlickandcleanthewoundsofconspecifics ol. 2008.VERSIT tphreeddiicrte?cStioo,netvheantethvooulugthiomnaortyivtahteioonrywwilolublde (tBhaotesacdhul1t9m92a)l,ewmhaicchaqisuesos cinrijutirceadlfdourrhineagliantg- chNI kept temporarily separate from evolutionary temptstoenteranewgroupoftentemporar- yU ev. Psby cEomnpsiadtehryatmioanysb,einmtohteiveantdionthaellytwauotwonilolmmoeuest., ialryermetourrenlitkoeltyhetoirrnecaetiivveetghriosuspe,rvwicheer(De itthteuys R u. butitstillneedstoproduce—onaverageand &Ratnayeke1989). n n inthelongrun—evolutionarilyadvantageous A outcomes. The central thesis to be argued LEVELSOFEMPATHY here,then,isthatempathyevolvedinanimals asthemainproximatemechanismfordirected EmotionalContagion altruism,andthatitcausesaltruismtobedis- Thelowestcommondenominatorofallem- pensed in accordance with predictions from pathic processes is that one party is affected kinselectionandreciprocalaltruismtheory. byanother’semotionalorarousalstate.This broad perspective on empathy, which goes ORIGINOFEMPATHY backasfarasLipps(1903),leadsonetorec- Empathyallowsonetoquicklyandautomat- ognizecontinuitybetweenhumansandother icallyrelatetotheemotionalstatesofothers, animals as well as between human adults whichisessentialfortheregulationofsocial and young children. Emotional connected- interactions, coordinated activity, and coop- nessinhumansissocommon,startssoearly eration toward shared goals. Even though in life (e.g., Hoffman 1975, Zahn-Waxler & 282 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Radke-Yarrow 1990), and shows neural and their own response to pain (Langford et al. physiological correlates (e.g., Adolphs et al. 2006). 1994, Decety & Chaminade 2003a, Rimm- Miller et al. (1959) published the first of Sympathetic Kaufman&Kagan1996)aswellasagenetic a series of pioneering studies on the trans- concern: concern substrate (Plomin et al. 1993), that it would mission of affect in rhesus macaques. These aboutanother’sstate bestrangeindeedifnocontinuitywithother monkeystendtoterminateprojectedpictures andattemptsto species existed. Evolutionary continuity be- of conspecifics in a fearful pose even more amelioratethisstate (e.g.,consolation) tween humans and apes is reflected in the rapidly than negatively conditioned stimuli. similarityofemotionalcommunication(Parr Perhaps the most compelling evidence for Cognitiveempathy: empathycombined &Waller2007)aswellassimilarchangesin emotional contagion came from Wechkin withcontextual brainandperipheralskintemperatureinre- etal.(1964)andMassermanetal.(1964),who appraisalandan g sponse to emotionally charged images (Parr foundthatmonkeysrefusetopullachainthat understandingof s.or 2001,Parr&Hopkins2001). deliversfoodtothemifdoingsodeliversan whatcausedthe ew A flock of birds taking off all at once be- electricshocktoandtriggerspainreactionsin object’semotional vi state nnualree only. creafluseex-loinkee,ahmigohnlygatdhaepmtiviesssptarertaldeidngshoofwfesaar acocnocmerpnanfoiornth.Weohthetehre(rsetehebierlosawc)rirfiecmearienflseucnt-s Pseelfr-scoennatelrdeidstdriesstrse:ss nloaded from arjournals.a10/06/09. For personal us twwottphorurhheaotcsaetcsrtnceymrt(,sayHrstaiiehrgnyosoeggfrionefsembmroaeeitasddcfnoiauantunplh1vlste9oaieoou7lfivnotn5ehon—)it.mueiamaiAnanaltytamirwncetouhhasnnncpoeegdtrliweeecotorabnhosdro.reteiarmnSinnnogisdmfspoibtnitaafluhgarrdrttresi—elosstyde-sf, caSTtilvoyehonameirad,nlpahencaoxocttwehneeteovvaoftgeilariuco,vtaenCisorsiinoistvanmerccyoivegmsithcrebantprianioloescuodcsbuwaerrisoetwhxuphsaaleapln.ipnereamdisoaa-sl bwdoiistrthnreafsnrsoomtheerm’spathy wn of another’s emotional state, i.e., emotional oftheother’ssituationandattemptstounder- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI ccthooonnuttaaggghii:ooTnnh(ieHsoanbtofijetecltdaolwefttaeynasla.ai1m9ps9at3sos).ievmEemoptoirootincoaenlslasyl, sWwtahaneadnl (tt1hh9ee9c6ea)mussppeaetoahfkiscthorefeao“ctchtoieogrnn’sitieinvmcelouetdimoenspsa.stuhDcyhe” 2O 59:Y affectthesubject,suchastheextremelynoisy contextualappraisal. ol. 2008.VERSIT taermepbeerintagntrreujmecsteodf ydouurinnggapweesanwinhge.n Lthikeye symTphatehpysyfcrhoomlopgiecraslolnitaelradtiustrreedssi,stiwnhgiucihshiens chNI human children (Potegal 2000), they ex- theirsocialconsequencesareeachother’sop- yU ev. Psby pnlaolitdeismtroetsiso,nwalhcicohntaingiotnurtno minadyuceleamdattehre- preosspitoenss.eSythmaptactohnysiisstdseofifnfeedelainsg“sanofafsfoercrtoivwe R u. mother to change her behavior to their or concern for a distressed or needy other n n advantage. (ratherthansharingtheemotionoftheother). A Emotional responses to displays of emo- Sympathy is believed to involve an other- tion in others are so commonplace in ani- oriented, altruistic motivation” (Eisenberg mals (de Waal 2003, Plutchik 1987, Preston 2000,p.677).Personaldistress,ontheother &deWaal2002b)thatDarwin(1982[1871, hand, makes the affected party selfishly seek p.77])alreadynotedthat“manyanimalscer- to alleviate its own distress, which mimics tainlysympathizewitheachother’sdistressor that of the object. Personal distress is not danger.” For example, rats and pigeons dis- concerned,therefore,withtheother(Batson playdistressinresponsetoperceiveddistress 1991).Astrikingnonhumanprimateexample inaconspecific,andtemporarilyinhibitcon- is how the continued screams of a punished ditioned behavior if it causes pain responses infantrhesusmonkeywillcauseotherinfants in others (Church 1959, Watanabe & Ono to embrace, mount, or even pile on top of 1986).Arecentexperimentdemonstratedthat thevictim.Thus,oneinfant’sdistressspreads mice perceiving other mice in pain intensify quicklytoitspeers,whichthenseektoreduce www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 283 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 their own negative arousal (de Waal 1996, his claims: “If I were to tell of his altruistic p.46). and obviously sympathetic behavior towards Concern for others is different in that it PanzeeIshouldbesuspectedofidealizingan Consolation: reliesonaseparationbetweeninternallyand ape.” Ladygina-Kohts (2001 [1935]) noticed comfortingbehavior directedata externally generated emotions. This separa- similartendenciesinheryounghome-reared distressedparty,such tion is observable in many mammals. In a chimpanzee.Shediscoveredthattheonlyway asarecentvictimof studythatsoughttodocumentchildren’sre- to get him off the roof of her house (better aggression sponsestofamilymembersinstructedtofeign thanrewardorthreatofpunishment)wasby sadness (sobbing), pain (crying), or distress actingdistressed,hencebyinducingconcern (choking), striking similarities emerged be- forherselfinhim. tweenthereactionsofone-year-oldchildren Perhapsthebest-documentedexampleof andpets,suchasdogsandcats.Thelatter,too, sympathetic concern is consolation, defined g s.or showedcomfortingattempts,suchasputting asreassuranceprovidedbyanuninvolvedby- w e theirheadinthelapofthe“distressed”person stander to one of the combatants in a pre- vi nnualree only. (ZaYhenr-kWesax(l1e9r2e5t,apl..1294864)).reported how his vRioooussmaaglgenre1ss9i7ve9).inFcoirdeenxatm(dpele,Waathalird&pavratny nals.anal us bfoornhoibsosi,cPklryinccheimCphainmz,esehcoowmepdansuiochn,cPoannczeeren, ganoeasrmovaerrotuontdhehliossoerrhoefrashfioguhltdaenrds(gFeingtulyrepu1t)s. m arjouror perso thatthescientificestablishmentmightreject De Waal & van Roosmalen (1979) analyzed oF d fr09. nloade10/06/ wn oo 00. DAMI 79-3F MI 2O 59:Y 8.T 200RSI ol. VE chNI yU v. Psby e R u. n n A Figure1 Consolationis commonin humansandapes, butvirtuallyabsent inmonkeys.Herea juvenile chimpanzeeputs anarmarounda screamingadult male,whohasjust beendefeatedina fight.Photograph bytheauthor. 284 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 hundredsofconsolationsinchimpanzees,and and best-known definitions by Smith (1759, de Waal & Aureli (1996) included an even p. 10) “changing places in fancy with the larger sample. These studies show that by- sufferer.” Empathic standers contact victims of aggression more Menzel(1974)wasthefirsttoinvestigate perspective-taking: often than they contact aggressors, and by- whetherchimpanzeesunderstandwhatothers thecapacitytotake standerscontactvictimsofseriousaggression know,settingthestageforstudiesofnonhu- another’s moreoftenthantheycontactthosewhohad man theory-of-mind and perspective-taking. perspective—e.g., understanding receivedmildaggression. Afterseveralupsanddownsintheevidence, another’sspecific Subsequent studies have confirmed con- currentconsensusseemstobethatapes,but situationandneeds solation in captive apes (Cordoni et al. probably not monkeys, show some level of separatefromone’s 2004; Fuentes et al. 2002; Koski & Sterck perspective-takingbothintheirspontaneous own—combined 2006; Mallavarapu et al. 2006; Palagi et al. social behavior (de Waal 1996, 1998 [1982]) withvicarious g s.or 2004,2006),wildchimpanzees(Kutsukake& and under experimental conditions (Bra¨uer emotionalarousal ew Castles2004,Wittig&Boesch2003),large- et al. 2005; Hare et al. 2001, 2006; Hirata Targetedhelping: vi helpandcarebased nnualree only. bchrailidnreednbi(rFdusji(sSaeweadeett aall..22000076),).anHdohwuemvearn, 200A6;Smhialljiotroetmaal.n2if0e0st5a)t.ion of empathic oapnpareccoigatniiotniveofthe nals.anal us wthheesnamdeeWobasaelr&vaAtiuornelpir(o19to9c6o)lsteotoduettetoctacpopnly- pinegr,spwehcitcihvei-sthakeilnpgfiinses-otu-cnaeldletdotaanrgoethteedr’shseplpe-- ootrhseitru’sastpioencificneed m arjouror perso sdoidlaotitohnerisn(mWoanttkseeytsa,lt.h2e0y0f0a)i.leTdhteocfionndsoalnatyi,oans cliitfiecrastiutureatioonnapnrdimgaotaelsb(edheaWvioarall1ea9v9e6s).lTitthlee nloaded fro10/06/09. F g(oian.epe.,bshietutuwmateaieonnnsmawnohdnerkaeepyeossn)aenewxdtoetunhldedsHmevooemsntinetooxpidteheceat dpAoaltrurtbuictiusamlbaor,lubyteltionhwea)ep.xeAisstme(nsoecteehoeFfrrtoaamprgeeEwtemhdopharetelhtpuyinrntgos, wn consolation to occur: Macaque mothers fail toawhimperingyoungstertohelpitfromone oo 79-300. DF MIAMI t(tSoencchtoianmnoafoleyrtstiaslt.ho2ef0ihr0u4on)w.dnOre’odCfsfosonpfrnrieenlpgl’osar(ft1ts9ecr9o5an)fificrogmnh-st twtrhaeerendtotdhrteahpeoenneehxetthr—ebbyoyodusywngbasyettienwrgeieshnetrrabopowpthendttrrieneeeastn—od- 2O 59:Y that reassurance of distressed others is typi- goesbeyondmereconcernfortheother.Her ol. 2008.VERSIT ctoalboefaepsteasbyliestheradr,ehionwmevoenrk,etyhsa.tItthsitsillbneheeadv-s r(ie.sep.,omnosethliekrealpyeisnovfotlevnesbreimefloytiwohniamlcpoenrttahgeimon- chNI ioractuallydoesreducethedistressedparty’s selveswhentheyheartheiroffspringdoso), yU ev. Psby arousal. bthuetoadthdesra’sssdeisstsrmesesnatnodftthheeosptheceirfi’scgroeaalsso.nTrfoeer R u. bridgingisadailyoccurrenceinorangutans, n EmpathicPerspective-Taking n with mothers regularly anticipating their A Psychologists usually speak of empathy only offspring’sneeds(vanSchaik2004,p.104). when it involves perspective-taking. They For an individual to move beyond being emphasize understanding of the other, and sensitive to others toward an explicit other- adoption of the other’s point of view. In orientation requires a shift in perspective. this view, then, empathy is a cognitive affair The emotional state induced in oneself by dependent on imagination and mental state the other now needs to be attributed to the attribution, which may explain the skepti- other instead of the self. A heightened self- cismaboutnonhumanempathy(Hauser2000, identityallowsasubjecttorelatetotheobject’s Povinelli1998).Perspective-takingbyitselfis, emotionalstatewithoutlosingsightoftheac- ofcourse,hardlyempathy:Itissoonlyincom- tualsourceofthisstate(Hoffman1982,Lewis bination with emotional engagement. The 2002). The required self-representation is latter here is called “empathic perspective- hardtoestablishindependently,butonecom- taking,” such as in one of the oldest monavenueistogaugereactionstoamirror. www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 285 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 The coemergence hypothesis predicts that 2005,Emery&Clayton2001).Thesereports mirrorself-recognition(MSR)andadvanced concern the finding or hiding of food, how- expressions of empathy appear together in ever,hencenotempathicperspective-taking. Mirror bothdevelopmentandphylogeny. Inthefuture,wemaybeabletoaddressthe self-recognition (MSR): recognizing Ontogenetically, the coemergence hy- self-other distinction more directly through thatone’sownbody pothesis is well-supported (Bischof-Ko¨hler neural investigation (Decety & Chaminade isreflectedinthe 1988, Johnson 1992, Zahn-Waxler et al. 2003b).Inhumans,therightinferiorparietal mirror 1992). The relation between MSR and the cortex, at the temporo-parietal junction, development of empathic perspective-taking underpins empathy by helping distinguish holds even after the data have been sta- between self- and other-produced actions tistically controlled for age (Bischof-Ko¨hler (Decety&Gre`zes2006). 1991).Gallup(1982)wasthefirsttopropose g s.or phylogeneticcoemergence,apredictionem- ew pirically supported by the contrast between UNDERLYINGMECHANISMS vi nnualree only. mfoornMkeSyRs,ancodnaspoelas,tiwonit,hacnodmtpaerglleintegdevhiedlepnincge PerceptionActionMechanism nals.anal us onlAypinaratpferso.mthegreatapes,theanimalsfor Pcorreestoofnth&edemeWpaatahlic(2c0a0p2aac)itpyrloiepsoasemtehcahtaantitshme m arjouror perso wofhcicohnswoleatihoanveantdhetamrgoestetdsthreiklpininggaacrceoudnotl-s tahccaetspsrtoovitdheessaunbjoecbtsievrevestrat(ethoefsaunbojethcte)rw(tihthe nloaded fro10/06/09. F pAphrletirnduisicstamend,dMbeeSlleoRpwhin)a.ndGtosalpl(lshueipens(F1arn9od8m3e)leEhpmahdapnaattlshr,eyaandtody obtebonjdediclsytt)ortehtphrroeeusogebnhjetatchtti’esonsstusa.btWjee,cthth’esenoswtuhbnejenscuetbu’sjrenacletuaarntad-l wn these predictions have now been confirmed representationsofsimilarstatesareautomat- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI btwoyittlhohoceuamtteaaramkmitrerasortrk,i(noPnlwohittnisciekhlfeattnhaialn.td2ii0tv0icd6au,naRnleonitessesed&es istchimaellieylaaarsinaednrduthnseococsuinabslcljyeiocctul’ssolsiydeeatcnwttioivfiaictnaedtdiio.vniTdhwueaitlmshaotrhreee, 2O 59:Y Marino2001).MSRisbelievedtobeabsent object, which enhances the subject’s match- ol. 2008.VERSIT i&nGthaellruepst1o9f9t9h).eanimalkingdom(Anderson itnhgemsuobtjoerctangdetau“tuonndoemritchreesspkoinn”seos.fTthheisolebt-s chNI Itshouldbeaddedthatself-representation ject, bodily sharing its emotions and needs, yU ev. Psby ifsewunllairkgeely-brtoainheadveanaipmpaelasr.edThdeefnraomvoewinorka winhgi.chPriensttounrn&madyefoWstaearl’ssym(2p00at2hay)aPnAdMhefilpt-s R u. ofdevelopmentalpsychologists,accordingto Damasio’s(1994)somaticmarkerhypothesis n n whichself-representationemergesinsmallin- of emotions as well as evidence for a link at A crementalsteps(Lewis&Brooks-Gunn1979, thecellularlevelbetweenperceptionandac- Rochat 2003), may apply also to phylogeny. tion,suchasthemirrorneuronsdiscoveredin Insteadofadheringtoanall-or-nothingdivi- macaquesbydiPellegrinoetal.(1992). sionofself-representation,someanimalsmay Humandatasuggestthatasimilarphysio- reach an intermediate stage similar to that logicalsubstrateunderliesbothobservingand of pre-MSR human infants (de Waal et al. experiencinganemotion(Adolphsetal.1997, 2005). 2000), and that affect communication cre- Possibly, the link between MSR and ates matching physiological states in subject perspective-taking is relatively loose. and object (Dimberg 1982, 1990; Levenson Perspective-takinghasrecentlybeenreported & Reuf 1992). Recent investigations of the for species that appear to lack MSR, both neural basis of human empathy confirm the mammals (Kuroshima et al. 2003, Vira´nyi PAMinthattheyreportneuralsimilaritybe- et al. 2005) and birds (Bugnyar & Heinrich tweenself-generatedandvicariousemotions 286 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 (Carretal.2003,Decety&Chaminade2003a, involvedinbothimitationandempathy,one Decety&Jackson2006,deGelderetal.2004, expectscorrelationsbetweenbothcapacities. Singer et al. 2004), such as activation of the Highlyempathicpersonsareindeedmorein- anteriorventralinsulabothwhenwearedis- clinedtounconsciousmimicry(Chartrand& gusted and when we see another person ex- Bargh 1999) and humans with autism spec- pressingdisgust(Wickeretal.2003). trum disorder are not only deficient in em- Theideathatperceptionandactionshare pathy but also imitation (Charman 2002, representationsisanythingbutnew.Accord- Charman et al. 1997). Functional magnetic ingly,empathyisarapidroutine,asconfirmed resonance imaging studies neurally connect byelectromyographicstudiesofmusclecon- motormimicry,suchascontagiousyawning, tractionsinthehumanfaceinresponsetopic- withempathicmodeling(Plateketal.2005). tures of facial expressions, even if presented Other primates, too, yawn when they g s.or sobrieflythattheycannotbeconsciouslyper- seeconspecificsyawn(Andersonetal.2004, w e ceived(Dimbergetal.2000).Accountsofem- Paukner & Anderson 2006). In fact, behav- vi nnualree only. pauatthomyaastiaccroeganctiitoivnes,pwrohciecshsaorfetefnarnteogolercatpsiductho ioofratlhceoppyriimngat(e“sa.piSnogc”i)alisfapcriolintaotuionncedexipnerail-l nals.anal us beundervoluntarycontrol. minegnatgsasihnowwhtehnattshaetyiatseedeportihmerasteesabte(gAidndeeasts-i m arjouror perso RussianDollModel &scrVaticsahlbtheergmhsie2lv0e0s1w,hDeinndooth&ersdescWratacahl2th0e0m6)-, nloaded fro10/06/09. F Eiwnmidthipvaisdtimhuyapll’cseoemvmeerocsthiaaolnnliastlmhsestaawtteaiytassffceioncrtsewaahnniodchtmheoornr’see, st(Baellaviremdsi2t(0aNt0ia6ok,naFyseiamrmraialrair2et0to0al4t.h)2,a0ta0no6fd).hNsuhmoovwaenlnibneefohananvat--s wn complex mechanisms and perspective-taking ioriscopied,too,atleastbytheapes.Exam- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI alsapbyeielairkteiedosfnaatsthuiertseRooufuststeiharenlcadaypoealrlcs.imtiBeoesdcieanlu,vsoienlvoewfdh,tihwcihes powlteehlselararsses(djuuecvcWeensasilfaeulsl1idm9o9i-8taas[t-1inI9-g8d2toh]e,exKppeo¨echruilmeliraer1nw9ts2a5wlk)itoahsf 2O 59:Y highercognitivelevelsofempathybuildupon humanmodels(Custanceetal.1995,Myowa- ol. 2008.VERSIT a(defirWma,ahla2r0d0-w3)i.reTdhebacsliasi,msuicshnoatstthhaet PPAAMM YamBaokdoislyhis&imMilaartitsyu—zawsuach19a9s9w).ith members chNI by itself explains sympathetic concern or of the same gender and species—likely en- yU ev. Psby pcoegrsnpieticvteivlye-mtaokriengad,bvuantcthedatfiotrumnsdeorfpeimnsptahtehsye, htiaonnc,ewshsihcahrehdasrbepeerensepnrotaptoiosnedaansdthideebnatsifiiscoa-f R u. and serves to motivate behavioral outcomes. trueimitation(deWaal1998,2001),suchas n n Without emotional engagement induced by seen in the apes (Horner & Whiten 2005). A state-matching, perspective-taking would be Thetendencyofnonhumanprimatestocopy a cold phenomenon that could just as easily eachotherisasspontaneousastheempathic lead to torture as to helping (Deacon 1997, response. Thus, mirror neurons fire auto- deWaal2005). maticallytoobservedactions,evenintentions Perception-action mechanisms are well (Fogassietal.2005),andmonkeysrequireno known for motor perception (Prinz & extrinsicrewardstocopyeachother’sbehav- Hommel2002,Wolpertetal.2001),sothat ior(Bonnie&deWaal2006). we may assume PAM to underlie not only In accordance with the PAM (Preston & emotional state matching but also motor de Waal 2002a), the motivational structure mimicry. This means that the Russian Doll ofbothimitationandempathythereforein- also relates to doing as others do, including cludes(a)sharedrepresentations;(b)identifi- bodily synchronization, coordination, imita- cationwithothersbasedonphysicalsimilarity, tion, and emulation (Figure 2). If PAM is shared experience, and social closeness; and www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 287 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Imitation Empathy n True imitation, Perspective- o cti emulation taking, targeted n helping sti Di r e h Ot Sympathetic - Coordination, g elf shared goals concern, or S consolation s. d w e annualreviese only. Increas Motor mimicry PAM Ecomnotatigoinoanl als.al u nn m arjouror perso oF d fr09. Figure2 wnloaden 10/06/ TtlahyheeesrusR,busjsuesccithanaansddosytllhmmepooabdthjeeelctoti,cfwecmoitnhpcaaettrhniytsaancndodrpeimetrhistepaetpiceotrinvc.eeE-pttmaikopinan-tgah,cybti(uorinilgdhmut)epcionhndaunthciseimssha(aPsriAdmM-iwl)ai.rrTeedmhseoodtcioioolnl-’aaslfofseutcattetiervein oo 00. DAMI bthaesiPs.ASMhaurinndgetrhlieessammoetomremchimanicisrmy,,ctohoerddionlal’stioimn,itsahtiaornedsigdoea(llse,fat)ncdotrrrueelaitmesitwatitiohnt.hEeveemnptahtohuygshidteh.eHdeorlel’s, 79-3F MI oreumtearinlacyoernsndeecpteedndtoointspirnenferornctoarlef.unctioningandanincreasingself-otherdistinction,theseouterlayers 2O 59:Y ol. 2008.VERSIT (pcl)ieasuttoomthaeticcoitryeamnedcshpaonnistman,enitoyt.nAelcleosfstahriislyapto- efimedpaptahiny.rAesgpooondseeoxafmmpicleesseeeeminsgtohtehienrtemniscie- chNI themorecomplexouterlayersoftheRussian inpain(Langfordetal.2006).Emotionalcon- v. Psyby U dthoellemnvoidreoln,mwhenicth. developininteractionwith taalagrimonomfaoythleearsdtiondhiivdieduoarlsflfereig,hatmenoetdhebrydtihse- e R u. tressedbyheroffspring’sdistresstoreassure nn bothherselfandheroffspringbywarmingor A FROMEMPATHYTOALTRUISM nursing them, or inhibit an individual from Not all altruistic behavior requires empa- inflictingpainuponanotherbecauseofthevi- thy. When animals alert others to an out- cariousnegativearousalinducedbytheother’s sidethreat,worktogetherforimmediateself- distresscalls.Thus,simpleempathicreactions reward,orvocallyattractotherstodiscovered may benefit both the actor and individuals food,biologistsmayspeakofaltruismorco- closetothem. operation,butthisbehaviorisunlikelytobe Behavioral copying, too, often produces motivatedbyempathywiththebeneficiary. adaptive outcomes. Imagine a group of ani- malsinwhicheverymemberwastoeat,sleep, forage,orplayindependently:Thiswouldbe EmotionalContagion impossiblefornomadicanimals,suchaspri- Self-centeredvicariousarousal,knownasper- mates.Beinginsyncisoftenamatteroflife sonal distress, represents the oldest kind of ordeath(Boinski&Garber2000). 288 deWaal

Description:
Oct 6, 2009 agree with predictions from kin selection and reciprocal altruism theory. 279. AR Further .. predicted MSR in dolphins and elephants, and.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.