ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Putting the Altruism AR Further Click here for quick links to Back into Altruism: Annual Reviews content online, including: • Other articles in this volume The Evolution of Empathy g or • Top cited articles s. • Top downloaded articles w e • AR’s comprehensive search nnualrevie only. FLivrinagnLsinBks,.YMerk.esdNeatiWonalaParilmateResearchCenter,andPsychologyDepartment, as als.al u EmoryUniversity,Atlanta,Georgia30322;email:[email protected] nn m arjouror perso oF d fr09. nloade10/06/ wn oo 00. DAMI Annu.Rev.Psychol.2008.59:279–300 KeyWords 79-3F MI FirstpublishedonlineasaReviewinAdvanceon perception-action,perspective-taking,prosocialbehavior, 59:2Y O June5,2007 cooperation 8.T 200RSI hTthtpe:/A/npnsyucahl.RanevniuewalroefvPiesywchs.oolorggyisonlineat Abstract ol. VE chNI Thisarticle’sdoi: Evolutionary theory postulates that altruistic behavior evolved for ev. Psyby U 1C0o.p11yr4i6g/hatn(cid:2)ncur2e0v0.p8sybcyhA.5n9n.1u0al3R00e6v.i0e9w3s6.25 tahmeorettivuartnio-bneanlerfioltes,ithboewaervsethr,etpheeryfonremedert.oFboererxeptuerrnie-nbceendefibtystthoepolary- u. R Allrightsreserved ganism.Motivationalanalysesshouldrestrictthemselves,therefore, n n 0066-4308/08/0203-0279$20.00 to the altruistic impulse and its knowable consequences. Empathy A is an ideal candidate mechanism to underlie so-called directed al- truism,i.e.,altruisminresponsetoanother’spain,need,ordistress. Evidenceisaccumulatingthatthismechanismisphylogeneticallyan- cient,probablyasoldasmammalsandbirds.Perceptionoftheemo- tionalstateofanotherautomaticallyactivatessharedrepresentations causingamatchingemotionalstateintheobserver.Withincreasing cognition,state-matchingevolvedintomorecomplexforms,includ- ingconcernfortheotherandperspective-taking.Empathy-induced altruismderivesitsstrengthfromtheemotionalstakeitoffersthe selfintheother’swelfare.Thedynamicsoftheempathymechanism agree with predictions from kin selection and reciprocal altruism theory. 279 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 “Youbeginwiththeeffectofbehavioronac- Contents torsandrecipients;youdealwiththeproblem of internal motivation, which is a secondary INTRODUCTION................. 280 problem,afterward....[I]fyoustartwithmo- ORIGINOFEMPATHY............ 282 tivation, you have given up the evolutionary LEVELSOFEMPATHY........... 282 analysisattheoutset.” EmotionalContagion............. 282 Thisisaperfectlylegitimatestrategythat SympatheticConcern............. 283 has yielded profound insights into the evo- EmpathicPerspective-Taking..... 285 lutionofaltruism(e.g.,Dugatkin2006).Un- UNDERLYINGMECHANISMS... 286 fortunately,however,theseinsightshavenot PerceptionActionMechanism.... 286 come with a new terminology: Evolutionary RussianDollModel.............. 287 biologypersistsinusingmotivationalterms. ws.org FROALMTREUMIPSAMTH..Y..T..O............... 288 Thus, an action is called “selfish” regard- e less of whether or not the actor deliberately vi EmotionalContagion............. 288 nnualree only. SEymmppaaththicetPicerCspoenccteirvne-.T.a.k..in..g........... 228899 sceaellkesdb“eanlterfiutisstfiocr”iitfseiltf.bSeinmeifilatsrlay,raenciapciteinotnaist m arjournals.aor personal us ECMOPDNPRIACROTLEXHUCIYMTSIAEAOSTDNEEAV.ML.O.TE.LR.CV.U.HE.I.DAS.MN..I..S..M......O....F.. 229912 anTstoihcntoegstshtpaertnooatioctnthttoyerrpuiadiccneattrloe—ranldsrtareeucgdriasitrfitodcilisebnseagsnhhoeeofifrntwleithyfhebeetethoeoetprthhreooarr-t. wnloaded fron 10/06/09. F Sympathy...cannot,inanysense,be tmateegcnoettrioetmhfleeitkhsheecilovytneea—flrgmigcesrtvsee“swnsseiitvtlfihheostthhuh”geaihanrnvhbdeeerr“nnamiagltcnoruu.tliiaTvsrathimtciio”senauonsfi---s oo 79-300. DF MIAMI Empathy mayrebgearduendiqaSusmealyitshewl(fie1sl7lh5sp9ur,iitpne.cd3ip1flo7er). ionggyT(bShyoebeehvrioj&alucktWiionniglasrooynfb1mi9oo9lto8igv).aisttisonhaalstbeeremninuonl-- 59:2Y O Altruism bridgingthegapbetweenegoismandaltru- helpfulforcommunicationaboutmotivation ol. 2008.VERSIT (dbbeeihfioanlvoiitgoiiorcntah)l:at iasnmo,thsienrcpeeitrshoans’tshmeipsrfooprteurntyeoinfttroaonnsfeo’srmowinng ptoerdose.wThahteTwriavyertsodcildeawrhuepnthheedceocnifduesdiotnhaist chNI increasesthe feelingofdistress. evolutionary analyses require that effects be ev. Psyby U rceocsitptioentht’sefitnessata Hoffman(1981a,p.133) cvoernsseildye,rmedotsievpaatiroantealfraonmalymseostirveaqtuioirne. uCsonto- R performers u. keep motivation separate from evolutionary n Ultimatecauseor INTRODUCTION n considerations.Itisnotfornothingthatbiol- A goal: thebenefitsan Discussionsofaltruisticbehaviortendtosuf- ogistshammeronthedistinctionbetweenul- organismoritsclose kinderivefroma ferfromalackofdistinctionbetweenfunction timateandproximate(Mayr1961,Tinbergen behavior,hencethe andmotivation.Thisisduetothecontrasting 1963). The ultimate cause refers to why a probablereasonwhy emphasisofbiologistsandpsychologists,with behavior evolved over thousands of gener- thebehaviorwas theformerfocusingonwhataparticularbe- ations, which depends on its fitness conse- favoredbynatural havior is good for, and the latter on how it quences. The proximate cause, on the other selection comesabout. hand, refers to the immediate situation that Proximatecause: Evolutionaryexplanationsarebuiltaround triggers behavior, and the role of learning, situationthat triggersbehaviorand theprinciplethatallthatnaturalselectioncan physiology, and neural processes—typically themechanism workwitharetheeffectsofbehavior—notthe thedomainofpsychologists. (psychological, motivationbehindit.Thismeansthereisonly Proximateandultimateviewpointsdoin- neural,physiological) onelogicalstartingpointforevolutionaryac- form each other, yet are not to be con- thatenablesit counts, as explained by Trivers (2002, p. 6): flated. For example, primate cooperation is 280 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 promotedbysocialtolerance.Throughitsef- trinsically rewarding qualities in that it of- fectonfood-sharing,toleranceevensoutpay- fers the actor an emotional stake in the re- offdistributions(deWaal&Davis2003,Melis cipient’swell-being,i.e.,ifhelpingtheother Directedaltruism: et al. 2006). Tolerance likely is a proximate ameliorates the helper’s internal state (see helpingor mechanismthatevolvedtoservetheultimate Empathy as Evolved Proximate Mechanism, comfortingbehavior goalofcooperation,whichistoyieldbenefits below).Extrinsicrewards,ontheotherhand, directedatan forallcontributors. arelesslikelytoplayarole.Bydefinition,al- individualinneed, pain,ordistress Cooperation and altruistic behavior are truismcarriesaninitialcost,andpositivecon- thoughttohaveevolvedtohelpfamilymem- sequencesoccuronlyafterasignificanttime Intentional altruism: the bers and those inclined to return the favor interval (e.g., the recipient reciprocates) or altruistdeliberately (Hamilton1964,Trivers1971).Regardlessof notatall(e.g.,carefordependentkin),making seekstobenefit g whetherthisisthewholeexplanationornot forratherpoorlearningconditions. eithertheother s.or (see Sober & DS Wilson 1998, EO Wilson Intentionally selfish altruism would re- (intentionally ew 2005), the point is that ultimate accounts quire the actor to explicitly expect others to altruisticaltruism)or vi itself(intentionally nnualree only. sqtureensscerseftourrtnh-ebpenereffiotrsm, eir.ea.n,dp/oorsiittisvkeinc.oInnsaes-- rfoetrusrunchtheexfpaevcotra.tDioensspiinteatnhiemlaalcsk,tohfeeyvaidreenocfe- sEemlfipshatahltyr-ubiasmse)d m arjournals.aor personal us mhisfiodauwencryeh,vmtaehsore,rtyiehtepcislslaeouysb.neTelcynlheewiafisrhtbsawetmhcdoaarmtyivmebessoectdqlieivuraaeirttcieiotfendwdeaellaarlcytoorelnude--,, tat(eehr.neagta.t,shasenDuimomanwealdklys.inTtcrsauhrle1ey9coa7albm6tor,muuFitosetnaihcrcrelsap&irmeectiutFehrisans,ct-shhbibneuancmceehafianetlrssl aceaanmltroreptuahbitesohmrryn:wfhritoehmlpand wnloaded fron 10/06/09. F inisnemew,dhi,.iepc.ha,iandl,itrroeurcistdetiidcstabrleetshrsua.ivsTimohremarieamyaercdeoamttheoretahebeowrusatyi:ns 2stwht0riat0uht3e,saanKriefmaucglialpalnrsaop2ecp0nitr0gye0acag,isaeStaiiloiknmneorotteifcavilahp.tor2ioow0cn0a.i5ltI)t,ewxmaicslishlsuacumnoltgneie--s Ecathafmfpeeacpectmaiettdoyhtbytiooy:n(ataahn)ledsbtseahtaere 79-300. DoF MIAMI o 1. ttAeolrtberesutgiesgdtiinchgeimolprpidnuiglsstear.ensSdspscoiagnrnitnaanlgseoionrutrshe,eadcsitisgiionhn-t md19iaa9tt7eel)sy,eblbfue-tgntaehifinetraterhteueimrnnd.-ebHeedenlecpfiofumtslmoafcotansltf(roDuriusitgmiacmtbkeein-- oto(chft)heaiednrreeo’santshtsoitefanyrt,sew(f,boia)trnhatdshtsheeess 2O ofanotherinpainorneed. ol. 2008.59:VERSITY 2. toLiuoetnacreondmedreesaspfltoorruntishsemer.aecHintofeorl.prcinegdabsyapcoosintidvie- hctioamgveinoirttihvtayetphitcoharelilzyoornrge,amin.aeisi.nm, obciescyuournnsdloiktedhliyestaatonnitmlcyoaniln’-s ooTextrhhtheiesnerr,ddaespdfiebonrespiypttoiieonncngdtivhweihs.at chNI nect them with the original act. This ap- existsinmany yU 3. Intentionalaltruism.Helpbasedonthe ev. Psby prediction of behavioral effects. One pkilniegsdtoomm.ostreciprocalaltruismintheanimal a“nemimpaaltsh,yb”utinththeeterm R prediction could be that the help will presentreview nu. bereciprocated,hencethattheactwill Once evolved, behavior often assumes appliesevenifonly n motivationalautonomy,i.e.,itsmotivationbe- A produce a net benefit. Since the actor criterion(a)ismet comesdisconnectedfromitsultimategoals.A seeks to benefit itself, we may call this Motivational goodexampleissexualbehavior,whicharose autonomy: intentionally selfish altruism. The sec- toservereproduction.Sinceanimalsare,asfar independenceof ondpossibilityishelpbasedonanap- asweknow,unawareofthelinkbetweensex motivationfrom preciation of how one’s own behavior and reproduction, they must be engaging in ultimategoals willhelptheother.Sincetheactorseeks sex(asdohumansmuchofthetime)without tobenefittheother,wemaycallthisin- progenyinmind.Justassexcannotbemoti- tentionallyaltruisticaltruism. vated by unforeseen consequences, altruistic Some directed altruistic behavior is pro- behaviorcannotbemotivatedbyunforeseen moted by built-in rewards, such as the payoffs. oxytocin release during suckling that may Thealtruisticimpulseistobetakenvery underpin maternal care (Panksepp 1998). seriously, therefore, because even if altruis- Empathy-basedaltruismmayhavesimilarin- tic behavior were partially learned based on www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 281 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 short-termintrinsicrewardsorlong-termex- cognition is often critical, it is a secondary trinsicrewards,thisbynomeansrulesoutthe development. As noted by Hoffman (1981b, altruisticimpulse.Infact,itpresupposesthis p.79),“[H]umansmustbeequippedbiologi- Perception-action impulsegiventhatabehavior’sconsequences callytofunctioneffectivelyinmanysocialsit- mechanism(PAM): automaticallyand cannotbelearnedwithoutspontaneouslyen- uations without undue reliance on cognitive unconsciously gaginginitinthefirstplace. processes.” activatedneural This review seeks to restore the altruism The selection pressure to evolve rapid representationsof withinaltruismbyexploringtheroleofem- emotionalconnectednesslikelystartedinthe statesinthesubject pathyinthedirectedaltruismofhumansand context of parental care long before our similartothose perceivedinthe other animals. Some definitions of empathy speciesevolved(Eibl-Eibesfeldt1974[1971], object stressthesharingofemotions,whereasother MacLean1985).Signalingtheirstatethrough g Emotional definitions stress the capacity to put oneself smilingandcrying,humaninfantsurgetheir s.or contagion: intotheother’s“shoes.”Thelatterdefinitions caregiver to come into action (Acebo & ew emotional are so top-down, however, that they discon- Thoman 1995, Bowlby 1958). Equivalent vi state-matchingofa nnualree only. soubbjejeccttwithan nWeectfeomllopwathay bfrootmtomits-upposaspibplreoaacnhteciendsteenatds., mreepcrhoadnuicstmiosnorpeelireasteoninfeaeldlianngi,mcalelsaniningw,hainchd nals.anal us acdluodpitnigngmtehreebermoaodtieosntaplossesnibslietivdietfiyntoitiootnh,eirns-. wpaarremnitnsgaolefrtthteoyoanudnga.fAfevciatendorbymathmemiraloifafn- m arjouror perso Wineafinrismtcaolsnsainddertthheevuanridoeurslyleinvgelspoefrecmepptaiothny- swphroinrge’smnaieneeddsinlidkieflfyereonutt.-reproduced those nloaded fro10/06/09. F aPecxrtpeilsootnorenmt&heecdhreaenlWaitsiamoanl (b(2Pe0At0wM2eae))n. Apefrmtoepproattshheydis,awnbdye caonudOldpnlbcaeye aatphrpeollieeedminopuatththseiidcweictdaheperarcneietaytrwineogxriksctooendft,seoxi-tt wn altruism. cialrelationships.Thefactthatmammalsre- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI iismlaAitkeemlymaetjoocrhhaqnauviseemstsieotloenctgiesednweerhmaetptehaetdhriyreeavcsotelpudrtioaoxln-- tainatidntuhdceiisnctgroensstisgivnnouacelasdl.izsFuaotrirvoinevxasalinmvtapolluaeed,upolrtfhimeomoatdpeahstihnoyft--s 2O 59:Y truism. Does empathy channel altruism in tenlickandcleanthewoundsofconspecifics ol. 2008.VERSIT tphreeddiicrte?cStioo,netvheantethvooulugthiomnaortyivtahteioonrywwilolublde (tBhaotesacdhul1t9m92a)l,ewmhaicchaqisuesos cinrijutirceadlfdourrhineagliantg- chNI kept temporarily separate from evolutionary temptstoenteranewgroupoftentemporar- yU ev. Psby cEomnpsiadtehryatmioanysb,einmtohteiveantdionthaellytwauotwonilolmmoeuest., ialryermetourrenlitkoeltyhetoirrnecaetiivveetghriosuspe,rvwicheer(De itthteuys R u. butitstillneedstoproduce—onaverageand &Ratnayeke1989). n n inthelongrun—evolutionarilyadvantageous A outcomes. The central thesis to be argued LEVELSOFEMPATHY here,then,isthatempathyevolvedinanimals asthemainproximatemechanismfordirected EmotionalContagion altruism,andthatitcausesaltruismtobedis- Thelowestcommondenominatorofallem- pensed in accordance with predictions from pathic processes is that one party is affected kinselectionandreciprocalaltruismtheory. byanother’semotionalorarousalstate.This broad perspective on empathy, which goes ORIGINOFEMPATHY backasfarasLipps(1903),leadsonetorec- Empathyallowsonetoquicklyandautomat- ognizecontinuitybetweenhumansandother icallyrelatetotheemotionalstatesofothers, animals as well as between human adults whichisessentialfortheregulationofsocial and young children. Emotional connected- interactions, coordinated activity, and coop- nessinhumansissocommon,startssoearly eration toward shared goals. Even though in life (e.g., Hoffman 1975, Zahn-Waxler & 282 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Radke-Yarrow 1990), and shows neural and their own response to pain (Langford et al. physiological correlates (e.g., Adolphs et al. 2006). 1994, Decety & Chaminade 2003a, Rimm- Miller et al. (1959) published the first of Sympathetic Kaufman&Kagan1996)aswellasagenetic a series of pioneering studies on the trans- concern: concern substrate (Plomin et al. 1993), that it would mission of affect in rhesus macaques. These aboutanother’sstate bestrangeindeedifnocontinuitywithother monkeystendtoterminateprojectedpictures andattemptsto species existed. Evolutionary continuity be- of conspecifics in a fearful pose even more amelioratethisstate (e.g.,consolation) tween humans and apes is reflected in the rapidly than negatively conditioned stimuli. similarityofemotionalcommunication(Parr Perhaps the most compelling evidence for Cognitiveempathy: empathycombined &Waller2007)aswellassimilarchangesin emotional contagion came from Wechkin withcontextual brainandperipheralskintemperatureinre- etal.(1964)andMassermanetal.(1964),who appraisalandan g sponse to emotionally charged images (Parr foundthatmonkeysrefusetopullachainthat understandingof s.or 2001,Parr&Hopkins2001). deliversfoodtothemifdoingsodeliversan whatcausedthe ew A flock of birds taking off all at once be- electricshocktoandtriggerspainreactionsin object’semotional vi state nnualree only. creafluseex-loinkee,ahmigohnlygatdhaepmtiviesssptarertaldeidngshoofwfesaar acocnocmerpnanfoiornth.Weohthetehre(rsetehebierlosawc)rirfiecmearienflseucnt-s Pseelfr-scoennatelrdeidstdriesstrse:ss nloaded from arjournals.a10/06/09. For personal us twwottphorurhheaotcsaetcsrtnceymrt(,sayHrstaiiehrgnyosoeggfrionefsembmroaeeitasddcfnoiauantunplh1vlste9oaieoou7lfivnotn5ehon—)it.mueiamaiAnanaltytamirwncetouhhasnnncpoeegdtrliweeecotorabnhosdro.reteiarmnSinnnogisdmfspoibtnitaafluhgarrdrttresi—elosstyde-sf, caSTtilvoyehonameirad,nlpahencaoxocttwehneeteovvaoftgeilariuco,vtaenCisorsiinoistvanmerccyoivegmsithcrebantprianioloescuodcsbuwaerrisoetwhxuphsaaleapln.ipnereamdisoaa-sl bwdoiistrthnreafsnrsoomtheerm’spathy wn of another’s emotional state, i.e., emotional oftheother’ssituationandattemptstounder- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI ccthooonnuttaaggghii:ooTnnh(ieHsoanbtofijetecltdaolwefttaeynasla.ai1m9ps9at3sos).ievmEemoptoirootincoaenlslasyl, sWwtahaneadnl (tt1hh9ee9c6ea)mussppeaetoahfkiscthorefeao“ctchtoieogrnn’sitieinvmcelouetdimoenspsa.stuhDcyhe” 2O 59:Y affectthesubject,suchastheextremelynoisy contextualappraisal. ol. 2008.VERSIT taermepbeerintagntrreujmecsteodf ydouurinnggapweesanwinhge.n Lthikeye symTphatehpysyfcrhoomlopgiecraslolnitaelradtiustrreedssi,stiwnhgiucihshiens chNI human children (Potegal 2000), they ex- theirsocialconsequencesareeachother’sop- yU ev. Psby pnlaolitdeismtroetsiso,nwalhcicohntaingiotnurtno minadyuceleamdattehre- preosspitoenss.eSythmaptactohnysiisstdseofifnfeedelainsg“sanofafsfoercrtoivwe R u. mother to change her behavior to their or concern for a distressed or needy other n n advantage. (ratherthansharingtheemotionoftheother). A Emotional responses to displays of emo- Sympathy is believed to involve an other- tion in others are so commonplace in ani- oriented, altruistic motivation” (Eisenberg mals (de Waal 2003, Plutchik 1987, Preston 2000,p.677).Personaldistress,ontheother &deWaal2002b)thatDarwin(1982[1871, hand, makes the affected party selfishly seek p.77])alreadynotedthat“manyanimalscer- to alleviate its own distress, which mimics tainlysympathizewitheachother’sdistressor that of the object. Personal distress is not danger.” For example, rats and pigeons dis- concerned,therefore,withtheother(Batson playdistressinresponsetoperceiveddistress 1991).Astrikingnonhumanprimateexample inaconspecific,andtemporarilyinhibitcon- is how the continued screams of a punished ditioned behavior if it causes pain responses infantrhesusmonkeywillcauseotherinfants in others (Church 1959, Watanabe & Ono to embrace, mount, or even pile on top of 1986).Arecentexperimentdemonstratedthat thevictim.Thus,oneinfant’sdistressspreads mice perceiving other mice in pain intensify quicklytoitspeers,whichthenseektoreduce www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 283 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 their own negative arousal (de Waal 1996, his claims: “If I were to tell of his altruistic p.46). and obviously sympathetic behavior towards Concern for others is different in that it PanzeeIshouldbesuspectedofidealizingan Consolation: reliesonaseparationbetweeninternallyand ape.” Ladygina-Kohts (2001 [1935]) noticed comfortingbehavior directedata externally generated emotions. This separa- similartendenciesinheryounghome-reared distressedparty,such tion is observable in many mammals. In a chimpanzee.Shediscoveredthattheonlyway asarecentvictimof studythatsoughttodocumentchildren’sre- to get him off the roof of her house (better aggression sponsestofamilymembersinstructedtofeign thanrewardorthreatofpunishment)wasby sadness (sobbing), pain (crying), or distress actingdistressed,hencebyinducingconcern (choking), striking similarities emerged be- forherselfinhim. tweenthereactionsofone-year-oldchildren Perhapsthebest-documentedexampleof andpets,suchasdogsandcats.Thelatter,too, sympathetic concern is consolation, defined g s.or showedcomfortingattempts,suchasputting asreassuranceprovidedbyanuninvolvedby- w e theirheadinthelapofthe“distressed”person stander to one of the combatants in a pre- vi nnualree only. (ZaYhenr-kWesax(l1e9r2e5t,apl..1294864)).reported how his vRioooussmaaglgenre1ss9i7ve9).inFcoirdeenxatm(dpele,Waathalird&pavratny nals.anal us bfoornhoibsosi,cPklryinccheimCphainmz,esehcoowmepdansuiochn,cPoannczeeren, ganoeasrmovaerrotuontdhehliossoerrhoefrashfioguhltdaenrds(gFeingtulyrepu1t)s. m arjouror perso thatthescientificestablishmentmightreject De Waal & van Roosmalen (1979) analyzed oF d fr09. nloade10/06/ wn oo 00. DAMI 79-3F MI 2O 59:Y 8.T 200RSI ol. VE chNI yU v. Psby e R u. n n A Figure1 Consolationis commonin humansandapes, butvirtuallyabsent inmonkeys.Herea juvenile chimpanzeeputs anarmarounda screamingadult male,whohasjust beendefeatedina fight.Photograph bytheauthor. 284 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 hundredsofconsolationsinchimpanzees,and and best-known definitions by Smith (1759, de Waal & Aureli (1996) included an even p. 10) “changing places in fancy with the larger sample. These studies show that by- sufferer.” Empathic standers contact victims of aggression more Menzel(1974)wasthefirsttoinvestigate perspective-taking: often than they contact aggressors, and by- whetherchimpanzeesunderstandwhatothers thecapacitytotake standerscontactvictimsofseriousaggression know,settingthestageforstudiesofnonhu- another’s moreoftenthantheycontactthosewhohad man theory-of-mind and perspective-taking. perspective—e.g., understanding receivedmildaggression. Afterseveralupsanddownsintheevidence, another’sspecific Subsequent studies have confirmed con- currentconsensusseemstobethatapes,but situationandneeds solation in captive apes (Cordoni et al. probably not monkeys, show some level of separatefromone’s 2004; Fuentes et al. 2002; Koski & Sterck perspective-takingbothintheirspontaneous own—combined 2006; Mallavarapu et al. 2006; Palagi et al. social behavior (de Waal 1996, 1998 [1982]) withvicarious g s.or 2004,2006),wildchimpanzees(Kutsukake& and under experimental conditions (Bra¨uer emotionalarousal ew Castles2004,Wittig&Boesch2003),large- et al. 2005; Hare et al. 2001, 2006; Hirata Targetedhelping: vi helpandcarebased nnualree only. bchrailidnreednbi(rFdusji(sSaeweadeett aall..22000076),).anHdohwuemvearn, 200A6;Smhialljiotroetmaal.n2if0e0st5a)t.ion of empathic oapnpareccoigatniiotniveofthe nals.anal us wthheesnamdeeWobasaelr&vaAtiuornelpir(o19to9c6o)lsteotoduettetoctacpopnly- pinegr,spwehcitcihvei-sthakeilnpgfiinses-otu-cnaeldletdotaanrgoethteedr’shseplpe-- ootrhseitru’sastpioencificneed m arjouror perso sdoidlaotitohnerisn(mWoanttkseeytsa,lt.h2e0y0f0a)i.leTdhteocfionndsoalnatyi,oans cliitfiecrastiutureatioonnapnrdimgaotaelsb(edheaWvioarall1ea9v9e6s).lTitthlee nloaded fro10/06/09. F g(oian.epe.,bshietutuwmateaieonnnsmawnohdnerkaeepyeossn)aenewxdtoetunhldedsHmevooemsntinetooxpidteheceat dpAoaltrurtbuictiusamlbaor,lubyteltionhwea)ep.xeAisstme(nsoecteehoeFfrrtoaamprgeeEwtemhdopharetelhtpuyinrntgos, wn consolation to occur: Macaque mothers fail toawhimperingyoungstertohelpitfromone oo 79-300. DF MIAMI t(tSoencchtoianmnoafoleyrtstiaslt.ho2ef0ihr0u4on)w.dnOre’odCfsfosonpfrnrieenlpgl’osar(ft1ts9ecr9o5an)fificrogmnh-st twtrhaeerendtotdhrteahpeoenneehxetthr—ebbyoyodusywngbasyettienwrgeieshnetrrabopowpthendttrrieneeeastn—od- 2O 59:Y that reassurance of distressed others is typi- goesbeyondmereconcernfortheother.Her ol. 2008.VERSIT ctoalboefaepsteasbyliestheradr,ehionwmevoenrk,etyhsa.tItthsitsillbneheeadv-s r(ie.sep.,omnosethliekrealpyeisnovfotlevnesbreimefloytiwohniamlcpoenrttahgeimon- chNI ioractuallydoesreducethedistressedparty’s selveswhentheyheartheiroffspringdoso), yU ev. Psby arousal. bthuetoadthdesra’sssdeisstsrmesesnatnodftthheeosptheceirfi’scgroeaalsso.nTrfoeer R u. bridgingisadailyoccurrenceinorangutans, n EmpathicPerspective-Taking n with mothers regularly anticipating their A Psychologists usually speak of empathy only offspring’sneeds(vanSchaik2004,p.104). when it involves perspective-taking. They For an individual to move beyond being emphasize understanding of the other, and sensitive to others toward an explicit other- adoption of the other’s point of view. In orientation requires a shift in perspective. this view, then, empathy is a cognitive affair The emotional state induced in oneself by dependent on imagination and mental state the other now needs to be attributed to the attribution, which may explain the skepti- other instead of the self. A heightened self- cismaboutnonhumanempathy(Hauser2000, identityallowsasubjecttorelatetotheobject’s Povinelli1998).Perspective-takingbyitselfis, emotionalstatewithoutlosingsightoftheac- ofcourse,hardlyempathy:Itissoonlyincom- tualsourceofthisstate(Hoffman1982,Lewis bination with emotional engagement. The 2002). The required self-representation is latter here is called “empathic perspective- hardtoestablishindependently,butonecom- taking,” such as in one of the oldest monavenueistogaugereactionstoamirror. www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 285 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 The coemergence hypothesis predicts that 2005,Emery&Clayton2001).Thesereports mirrorself-recognition(MSR)andadvanced concern the finding or hiding of food, how- expressions of empathy appear together in ever,hencenotempathicperspective-taking. Mirror bothdevelopmentandphylogeny. Inthefuture,wemaybeabletoaddressthe self-recognition (MSR): recognizing Ontogenetically, the coemergence hy- self-other distinction more directly through thatone’sownbody pothesis is well-supported (Bischof-Ko¨hler neural investigation (Decety & Chaminade isreflectedinthe 1988, Johnson 1992, Zahn-Waxler et al. 2003b).Inhumans,therightinferiorparietal mirror 1992). The relation between MSR and the cortex, at the temporo-parietal junction, development of empathic perspective-taking underpins empathy by helping distinguish holds even after the data have been sta- between self- and other-produced actions tistically controlled for age (Bischof-Ko¨hler (Decety&Gre`zes2006). 1991).Gallup(1982)wasthefirsttopropose g s.or phylogeneticcoemergence,apredictionem- ew pirically supported by the contrast between UNDERLYINGMECHANISMS vi nnualree only. mfoornMkeSyRs,ancodnaspoelas,tiwonit,hacnodmtpaerglleintegdevhiedlepnincge PerceptionActionMechanism nals.anal us onlAypinaratpferso.mthegreatapes,theanimalsfor Pcorreestoofnth&edemeWpaatahlic(2c0a0p2aac)itpyrloiepsoasemtehcahtaantitshme m arjouror perso wofhcicohnswoleatihoanveantdhetamrgoestetdsthreiklpininggaacrceoudnotl-s tahccaetspsrtoovitdheessaunbjoecbtsievrevestrat(ethoefsaunbojethcte)rw(tihthe nloaded fro10/06/09. F pAphrletirnduisicstamend,dMbeeSlleoRpwhin)a.ndGtosalpl(lshueipens(F1arn9od8m3e)leEhpmahdapnaattlshr,eyaandtody obtebonjdediclsytt)ortehtphrroeeusogebnhjetatchtti’esonsstusa.btWjee,cthth’esenoswtuhbnejenscuetbu’sjrenacletuaarntad-l wn these predictions have now been confirmed representationsofsimilarstatesareautomat- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI btwoyittlhohoceuamtteaaramkmitrerasortrk,i(noPnlwohittnisciekhlfeattnhaialn.td2ii0tv0icd6au,naRnleonitessesed&es istchimaellieylaaarsinaednrduthnseococsuinabslcljyeiocctul’ssolsiydeeatcnwttioivfiaictnaedtdiio.vniTdhwueaitlmshaotrhreee, 2O 59:Y Marino2001).MSRisbelievedtobeabsent object, which enhances the subject’s match- ol. 2008.VERSIT i&nGthaellruepst1o9f9t9h).eanimalkingdom(Anderson itnhgemsuobtjoerctangdetau“tuonndoemritchreesspkoinn”seos.fTthheisolebt-s chNI Itshouldbeaddedthatself-representation ject, bodily sharing its emotions and needs, yU ev. Psby ifsewunllairkgeely-brtoainheadveanaipmpaelasr.edThdeefnraomvoewinorka winhgi.chPriensttounrn&madyefoWstaearl’ssym(2p00at2hay)aPnAdMhefilpt-s R u. ofdevelopmentalpsychologists,accordingto Damasio’s(1994)somaticmarkerhypothesis n n whichself-representationemergesinsmallin- of emotions as well as evidence for a link at A crementalsteps(Lewis&Brooks-Gunn1979, thecellularlevelbetweenperceptionandac- Rochat 2003), may apply also to phylogeny. tion,suchasthemirrorneuronsdiscoveredin Insteadofadheringtoanall-or-nothingdivi- macaquesbydiPellegrinoetal.(1992). sionofself-representation,someanimalsmay Humandatasuggestthatasimilarphysio- reach an intermediate stage similar to that logicalsubstrateunderliesbothobservingand of pre-MSR human infants (de Waal et al. experiencinganemotion(Adolphsetal.1997, 2005). 2000), and that affect communication cre- Possibly, the link between MSR and ates matching physiological states in subject perspective-taking is relatively loose. and object (Dimberg 1982, 1990; Levenson Perspective-takinghasrecentlybeenreported & Reuf 1992). Recent investigations of the for species that appear to lack MSR, both neural basis of human empathy confirm the mammals (Kuroshima et al. 2003, Vira´nyi PAMinthattheyreportneuralsimilaritybe- et al. 2005) and birds (Bugnyar & Heinrich tweenself-generatedandvicariousemotions 286 deWaal ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 (Carretal.2003,Decety&Chaminade2003a, involvedinbothimitationandempathy,one Decety&Jackson2006,deGelderetal.2004, expectscorrelationsbetweenbothcapacities. Singer et al. 2004), such as activation of the Highlyempathicpersonsareindeedmorein- anteriorventralinsulabothwhenwearedis- clinedtounconsciousmimicry(Chartrand& gusted and when we see another person ex- Bargh 1999) and humans with autism spec- pressingdisgust(Wickeretal.2003). trum disorder are not only deficient in em- Theideathatperceptionandactionshare pathy but also imitation (Charman 2002, representationsisanythingbutnew.Accord- Charman et al. 1997). Functional magnetic ingly,empathyisarapidroutine,asconfirmed resonance imaging studies neurally connect byelectromyographicstudiesofmusclecon- motormimicry,suchascontagiousyawning, tractionsinthehumanfaceinresponsetopic- withempathicmodeling(Plateketal.2005). tures of facial expressions, even if presented Other primates, too, yawn when they g s.or sobrieflythattheycannotbeconsciouslyper- seeconspecificsyawn(Andersonetal.2004, w e ceived(Dimbergetal.2000).Accountsofem- Paukner & Anderson 2006). In fact, behav- vi nnualree only. pauatthomyaastiaccroeganctiitoivnes,pwrohciecshsaorfetefnarnteogolercatpsiductho ioofratlhceoppyriimngat(e“sa.piSnogc”i)alisfapcriolintaotuionncedexipnerail-l nals.anal us beundervoluntarycontrol. minegnatgsasihnowwhtehnattshaetyiatseedeportihmerasteesabte(gAidndeeasts-i m arjouror perso RussianDollModel &scrVaticsahlbtheergmhsie2lv0e0s1w,hDeinndooth&ersdescWratacahl2th0e0m6)-, nloaded fro10/06/09. F Eiwnmidthipvaisdtimhuyapll’cseoemvmeerocsthiaaolnnliastlmhsestaawtteaiytassffceioncrtsewaahnniodchtmheoornr’see, st(Baellaviremdsi2t(0aNt0ia6ok,naFyseiamrmraialrair2et0to0al4t.h)2,a0ta0no6fd).hNsuhmoovwaenlnibneefohananvat--s wn complex mechanisms and perspective-taking ioriscopied,too,atleastbytheapes.Exam- oo 79-300. DF MIAMI alsapbyeielairkteiedosfnaatsthuiertseRooufuststeiharenlcadaypoealrlcs.imtiBeoesdcieanlu,vsoienlvoewfdh,tihwcihes powlteehlselararsses(djuuecvcWeensasilfaeulsl1idm9o9i-8taas[t-1inI9-g8d2toh]e,exKppeo¨echruilmeliraer1nw9ts2a5wlk)itoahsf 2O 59:Y highercognitivelevelsofempathybuildupon humanmodels(Custanceetal.1995,Myowa- ol. 2008.VERSIT a(defirWma,ahla2r0d0-w3)i.reTdhebacsliasi,msuicshnoatstthhaet PPAAMM YamBaokdoislyhis&imMilaartitsyu—zawsuach19a9s9w).ith members chNI by itself explains sympathetic concern or of the same gender and species—likely en- yU ev. Psby pcoegrsnpieticvteivlye-mtaokriengad,bvuantcthedatfiotrumnsdeorfpeimnsptahtehsye, htiaonnc,ewshsihcahrehdasrbepeerensepnrotaptoiosnedaansdthideebnatsifiiscoa-f R u. and serves to motivate behavioral outcomes. trueimitation(deWaal1998,2001),suchas n n Without emotional engagement induced by seen in the apes (Horner & Whiten 2005). A state-matching, perspective-taking would be Thetendencyofnonhumanprimatestocopy a cold phenomenon that could just as easily eachotherisasspontaneousastheempathic lead to torture as to helping (Deacon 1997, response. Thus, mirror neurons fire auto- deWaal2005). maticallytoobservedactions,evenintentions Perception-action mechanisms are well (Fogassietal.2005),andmonkeysrequireno known for motor perception (Prinz & extrinsicrewardstocopyeachother’sbehav- Hommel2002,Wolpertetal.2001),sothat ior(Bonnie&deWaal2006). we may assume PAM to underlie not only In accordance with the PAM (Preston & emotional state matching but also motor de Waal 2002a), the motivational structure mimicry. This means that the Russian Doll ofbothimitationandempathythereforein- also relates to doing as others do, including cludes(a)sharedrepresentations;(b)identifi- bodily synchronization, coordination, imita- cationwithothersbasedonphysicalsimilarity, tion, and emulation (Figure 2). If PAM is shared experience, and social closeness; and www.annualreviews.org • TheEvolutionofEmpathy 287 ANRV331-PS59-11 ARI 4November2007 20:27 Imitation Empathy n True imitation, Perspective- o cti emulation taking, targeted n helping sti Di r e h Ot Sympathetic - Coordination, g elf shared goals concern, or S consolation s. d w e annualreviese only. Increas Motor mimicry PAM Ecomnotatigoinoanl als.al u nn m arjouror perso oF d fr09. Figure2 wnloaden 10/06/ TtlahyheeesrusR,busjsuesccithanaansddosytllhmmepooabdthjeeelctoti,cfwecmoitnhpcaaettrhniytsaancndodrpeimetrhistepaetpiceotrinvc.eeE-pttmaikopinan-tgah,cybti(uorinilgdhmut)epcionhndaunthciseimssha(aPsriAdmM-iwl)ai.rrTeedmhseoodtcioioolnl-’aaslfofseutcattetiervein oo 00. DAMI bthaesiPs.ASMhaurinndgetrhlieessammoetomremchimanicisrmy,,ctohoerddionlal’stioimn,itsahtiaornedsigdoea(llse,fat)ncdotrrrueelaitmesitwatitiohnt.hEeveemnptahtohuygshidteh.eHdeorlel’s, 79-3F MI oreumtearinlacyoernsndeecpteedndtoointspirnenferornctoarlef.unctioningandanincreasingself-otherdistinction,theseouterlayers 2O 59:Y ol. 2008.VERSIT (pcl)ieasuttoomthaeticcoitryeamnedcshpaonnistman,enitoyt.nAelcleosfstahriislyapto- efimedpaptahiny.rAesgpooondseeoxafmmpicleesseeeeminsgtohtehienrtemniscie- chNI themorecomplexouterlayersoftheRussian inpain(Langfordetal.2006).Emotionalcon- v. Psyby U dthoellemnvoidreoln,mwhenicth. developininteractionwith taalagrimonomfaoythleearsdtiondhiivdieduoarlsflfereig,hatmenoetdhebrydtihse- e R u. tressedbyheroffspring’sdistresstoreassure nn bothherselfandheroffspringbywarmingor A FROMEMPATHYTOALTRUISM nursing them, or inhibit an individual from Not all altruistic behavior requires empa- inflictingpainuponanotherbecauseofthevi- thy. When animals alert others to an out- cariousnegativearousalinducedbytheother’s sidethreat,worktogetherforimmediateself- distresscalls.Thus,simpleempathicreactions reward,orvocallyattractotherstodiscovered may benefit both the actor and individuals food,biologistsmayspeakofaltruismorco- closetothem. operation,butthisbehaviorisunlikelytobe Behavioral copying, too, often produces motivatedbyempathywiththebeneficiary. adaptive outcomes. Imagine a group of ani- malsinwhicheverymemberwastoeat,sleep, forage,orplayindependently:Thiswouldbe EmotionalContagion impossiblefornomadicanimals,suchaspri- Self-centeredvicariousarousal,knownasper- mates.Beinginsyncisoftenamatteroflife sonal distress, represents the oldest kind of ordeath(Boinski&Garber2000). 288 deWaal
Description: