Table Of Content

OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES VOLUME 13 Published on behalf of The Faculty of Law, University of Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1993 General Editor: J. Eekelaar Editorial Committee: J. C.M cCrudden, P. N. Mirfield, D. D. Prentice, J. Hackney, S. Gardner, A. Briggs Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Petaling Jaya Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associate companies in Beirut Berlin Ibadan Nicosia © Oxford University Press 1993 except where otherwise indicated CONTENTS ARTICLES ALLDRIDGE, PETER, ““Attempted Murder of the Soul’’: Blackmail, Privacy and Secrets Davis, CHRISTINE, Estoppel: An Adequate Substitute for Part Performance? De Burca, GRAINNE, Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC Law HALL, C. G., An Unsearchable Providence: the Lawyer’s Concept of Act of God Honoré, Tony, The Dependence of Morality on Law Lewis, RICHARD, The Merits of a Structured Settlement: the Plaintiff’s Perspective McCoLGan, AILEEN, In Defence of Battered Women who Kill McCRuDDEN, CHRISTOPHER, The Effectiveness of European Equality Law: National Mechanisms for Enforcing Gender Equality Law in the Light of European Requirements NARAYAN, UMa, Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment RATNAPALA, SURI, The Trident Case and the Evolutionary Theory of F. A. Hayek REDMAYNE, SHARON, The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937: A Lesson in the Art of Compromise REYNOLDS, BARNEY, Natural Law versus Positivism: the Fundamental Conflict ROBERTSON, BERNARD, and VIGNAUX G. A., Probability: The Logic of the Law Srepp, Davin J., The Reception of Cannon Law and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1600 SIMMONDS, N. E., Bringing the Outside In SIMMONDS, N. E., Judgment and Mercy SMITH, K. J. M. and WILSON, WILLIAM, Impaired Voluntariness and Criminal Responsibility: Reworking Hart’s Theory of Excuses—The English Judicial Response UNsworTH, CLIive, Law and Lunacy in Psychiatry’s ‘Golden Age’ WALDRON, JEREMY, A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights REVIEW ARTICLES BELL, JOHN, Studying Statute Law DuxBury, NEIL, The Theory and History of American Law and Politics GOLDSWORTHY, JEFFREY, Is Jurisprudence Liberal Ideology? Rivey, C. A., Gower: Still a Blueprint for Curriculum Reform in Company Law? SULLIVAN, G. R., Anger and Excuse: Reassessing Provocation SHORTER ARTICLES AND COMMENTS Burrows, A., Restitution for Mistake in Australia CAMPBELL, A., A Divisive Issue and a Divided Court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey FLEMING, JOHN G., Employee’s Tort in a Contractual Matrix: New Approaches in Canada Juss, SATVINDER S., Administrative Convenience and the Carltona Principle Munpbay, RoODERICK, Comparative Law and English Law’s Character Evidence Rules LEGISLATION [Entries refer to statutes receiving substantial discussion or criticism in this volume] UNITED KINGDOM ‘Black Act’ (1722 371 Companies Act 1989 s 14 277-8 County Asylums Act 1808 484 et seq Criminal Law Act 1967 s3 510 et seq, 524 et seq Divorce Reform Act 1969 199-200 Homicide Act 1957 $2 70, 89 s3 21, 423 et seq, 512, 520-1 Immigration Act 1971 142 et seq s 19(1)(a)(i 144-5 Immigration Act 1988 2 et seq Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 s 261 584 et seq Larceny Act 1916 ss 29-31 et seq Law of Property Act 1925 s 40 et seq s 52 122 Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2 99 et seq, 124 et seq Libel Act 1843 372, 373, 377 s3 372, 381 Lunacy Act 1890 482 Lunacy Acts Amendment Act 1889 s 12 494 Madhouses Act 1774 482 et seq, 493 Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 183 et seq Mental Health Act 1983 479 et seq Offences against the Person Act 1861 283 Theft Act 1968 369 s 21 371, 379 EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Equal Pay Directive 1975 321 et seq Equal Treatment Directive 1976 (EC 322 et seq Art 2(2 349 Art 5 337-8 Art 6 325, 340, 342-3 CASES {Entries refer to cases receiving substantial discussion or criticism in this volume] Adler v Dickson (1955 432, 437 Advocate General (SPUC) v Open Door Counselling Ltd and Dublin Well Woman Centre Ltd (1988) (Ire 285 et seq Ahluwalia (1992 509 et seq Alphacell v Woodward (1972 71, 73-4 Att General v Cory Bros (1921 234-5, 244 Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Insurance Group (1990) (EC 349 Berkowitz 589 Broome v Perkins (1987 84, 86-7 Brown v Board of Education (1954) (US 250 et seq Carltona Ltd v Commissioner for Works (1943 142 et seq Casey (1992) (US 571 et seq Cinethéque SAv Foundation National des Cinemas Frangais (1985) (EC 300 et seq Comet BV v Produktschap voor Siergewassen (1976) (EC 335 et seq Commission v Denmark (1985) (EC 339 Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (1985) (EC 358 Commission v France (1988) (EC 349 Commission v Greece (1989) (EC 337-8 Conley (1989 383 Conway (1989 93 et seq Cushing v Walker (1941 232-3 David Securities Pty Ltd vyC ommonwealth Bank of Australia (1992 584 et seq Dekker v Stichting Vosmingsantrum Voor Jonge Volwassen Plus (1990) (EC 344 Duffy (1949 511, 512 iv Elder Dempster & Co v Paterson, Zichonis (1924 431-2 Elliniki Radiophonia Tileorassi v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis (ERT) (1991) (EC) 301 et seq Francovitch and Bonifaci v Italian Republic (1992) (EC 324-5, 336 Greasley v Cooke (1980 107-8 Greenock Corp v Caledonian Ry Co (1917 233 et seq Handels-og Kontortunkionaeremes Forbund i Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening acting for Danfoss) (1989) (EC 342 Handyside v UK (1979-80) (ECHR 311 Harz v Deutsche Tradax GmbH (1984) (EC 342-3 Hill v Baxter (1958 71, 84, 88 Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (1986) (EC 340-1 Joseph Constantine SS Line Ltd v Imperial Smelting Corp (1942 237 Kerr v Earl of Orkney 234 Khawaja v Secretary of State for the Home Department (1974 142, 145 Lavallee (1990) (Can 510, 522 Lochner v New York (1905) (US 249 et seq London Drugs Ltd v Kuene & Nagel (1992) (Can 430 et seq Marleasing SA v La Commercial Internacional de Alimentation SA (1990) (EC 324, 353 Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (No 2) (1988 344-5 Martin (1989 93 et seq Nichols v Marsland (1874-5 233 et seq Nitro-Phosphate & Odam’s Chemical Manure Co v London & St Katharine’s Docks (1878 231, 236, 241 Nottidge v Prince (1860 496-7 Nottidge v Ripley (1849 495 et seq Nugent v Smith (1876 239, 243, 244 Pandorf v Hamilton (1886 227-8, 244 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) (Aus 584 et seq R v Hadjou (1989 382-3 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Oladehinde (1991 142, 145 R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame Ltd (1990) (EC 338 R v T (1990 70, 86-7, 91 R v Tomlinson (1895 381-2 Re Basham (1986 104-5 Rewe-Zentralfinanz eG and Rewe Zentral AG v Landwirtschaftskammer fiir das Saarland 1976) (EC 335 et seq Roberts v Ramsbottom (1980 84, 85 Roe v Wade (1973) (US 571 et seq Ruck v Williams (1858 Rutili v Minister for the Interior (1975) (EC Rylands v Fletcher (1866 Santa Clara v Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) (US Secretary of State for the Home Department v Sonia Malhi (1990 144-5 Slater v Worthington’s Cash Stores (1941 235-6 SPUC v Grogan (1991) (Ire 287 et seq Steadman v Steadman (1976 et seq Tennant v Earl of Glasgow 234, 241, 242-3 Thatcher v The Queen (1987 465, 472-3 Thomas v Roberts (1849 495 et seq Thornton (1992 408 et seq Trevor Ivory v Anderson (1992) (NZ 438 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1987-8) (Aus 201-26 Turner (1975 523 Union nationale des entraineurs et Cadres techniques professionnels du football v Heylens (1987) (EC 337 Verholen, Van Wetten-Van Uden and Heiderijk v Sociale Verzekerings bank Amsterdam 1992 341 von Colson and Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (1984) (EC 342-3, 344 Wanrow (1988) (US 521 Willmott v Barber (1880 106-7 %