ebook img

nutritional composition of white finger millet varieties and its value addition PDF

119 Pages·2015·5.12 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview nutritional composition of white finger millet varieties and its value addition

NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF WHITE FINGER MILLET VARIETIES AND ITS VALUE ADDITION SNEHA SHIGIHALLI PALB 3206 DEPARTMENT OF FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES GKVK, BENGALURU-560065 2015 NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF WHITE FINGER MILLET VARIETIES AND ITS VALUE ADDITION SNEHA SHIGIHALLI PALB 3206 Thesis submitted to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Agriculture) in FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION Bengaluru July, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am indebted to the almighty, the elegant epitomizer of this demanding venture, bestowing the unruffled mind and matter along all these paths and cross roads. It is my privilege to express my deepest sense of gratitude and indebtedness to my research guide, Dr. Usha Ravindra Assoc. Professor, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Chairman of my advisory committee, for being so kind, helpful and motivating for my pursuit of the goal in length stood as the great moral and ideological lattice. She has always been there for me with her motherly hand whenever I needed it the most. Her constant guidance, cooperation and support have always kept me going ahead. I owe a lot of gratitude to her for always being there for me and I feel privileged to be associated with a person like her during my life. With a sense of pride and dignity, I sincerely thank the members of my advisory committee Dr.Vijayalakshmi, D. Professor and Head, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dr. Ravishankar, P. Genesist AICSMIP, PC unit UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru. and Dr. Shamshad Begum Assistant Professor (FSN) BTU DE’s office UAS, Hebbal Bengaluru for their subtle guidance, constructive criticism and timely correction of my thesis manuscript. I would like to extend my heartfelt respect and affection to my teachers Dr. Neena Joshi, Dr. Umadevi, S. Hiremath, Dr. M.L. Revanna, Dr. K. V. Jamuna, and K. G. Vijayalakshmi, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru and nonteaching staff of the Department for their constant support throughout my course of investigation. With immense pleasure I record my sincere thanks to my teachers Dr. R. Chandru Associate Professor of Post Harvest Technology Scheme and Mr. S. Manjunath, Associate Professor Department of Agricultural Statistics, for their generous help, co-operation and inspiration during the course of study. I would like to acknowledge all the teachers I learnt since from my childhood, I would not have been here without their guidance, blessing and support. My special thanks to Mr. Nazarate (uncle), Dr. Sindhagi. Yakkundi, Mukta Bhatt, O. Siddanna, Thammaiah, Dubale ,Dr. Sunanda Itagi and Dr. Kasturiba Department of Food Science and Nutrition UAS Dharwad for being role model for me. I feel privileged to be their student once. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to people who mean world to me, my maternal grandparents Mrs. S. S, yellur (Late) and Mr. S. G, Yellur and my parents Mr. Umesh Shigihalli, Mrs.Vidya and my lovely brother Sagar, for unconditional love care and support and my entire Shigihalli family and my relatives Yellur, Javali, Sanikop,Desai,Balikai and Akki families. I don’t imagine a life without their love and blessings. Thank you mom, dad, and all my family members for showing faith in me and giving me liberty to choose what I desired. I consider myself the luckiest in the world to have such a supportive family, standing behind me with their love and support. Fruitful results would not have hastened without the moral support of my dearest frienz., Shobha, Savitha, Priya, Laxmi, Netra, Bhavya, Afrin, Deepti,Arpita, Vaishali, Manjula, Akshatha, Sahana, Pavitra and all my SRMRS school friends for their lovely friendship, help,care and for making the days enjoyable and memorable. I sincerely thank them for their timeless support and help. I would also like to thank my seniors Jayalakshmi di (ZARS), Raghu anna, Varsha di, Gopika di , Bhaphi di ,Deepti di, Nayana di , Netra di, Chndra di, Anitha di, Deepa di, Jaya di for their suggestions and encouragement and last but not the least I would like to thank my juniors Pooja, Suguna, Manasa, and all my juniors for their great support. Not to forget that without my classmates Deepa J, Deepa L Deepika R. K, Mahadai M, Megha A. V, Megha M.K, and Roopa O. M, this endeavor would have seemed longer. I sincerely thank them for their timeless support and help. I use this opportunity to sincerely thank Mr. Shivaliga, Sr. Lab Assiatant, Dept of Food Science and Nutrition, UAS, Bangalore. I wish to express my thanks to Rangamma aunty and Lakshmi aunty for their support. No less share of credit goes to all other galaxies and oceans of friends for their timely help and good company during the course of study and completion of this manuscript. In the light of reaching a milestone in my life, I owe my deep sense of gratitude to all those who helped in a constructive fashion. I wish to acknowledge the help and cooperation rendered by the library UAS, Bengaluru. ……………any omission in this brief acknowledgement does not mean lack of gratitude. Bengaluru July, 2015 (Sneha Shigihalli) NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF WHITE FINGER MILLET VARIETIES AND ITS VALUE ADDITION SNEHA SHIGIHALLI THESIS ABSTRACT Finger millet stands unique among the small millets because of its superior nutritional contents. In the present investigation thirteen white finger millet varieties and one check (brown) variety were procured from AICSMIP Bengaluru and were analysed for physico-functional, nutrient, antinutrients and bioavailability of iron and calcium. Significant difference existed among the varieties for 1000 seed weight and volume (2.41-3.73 g and 3.12-3.83 ml), hydration capacity (0.61-0.75), swelling capacity, swelling index (1.32-1.89 and 0.40-0.56) bulk density and specific gravity (0.69-0.81 g/ml and 1.04-1.83). Functional characteristics-bulk density (0.70-0.86 g/ml), water and oil absorption capacity (1.30-1.83 and 1.03-2.00 ml/g), emulsification value (0.40-0.59 ml/g) swelling capacity and soluble index differed significantly. Nutrient composition such as moisture, protein, fat, crude fibre, carbohydrate and energy varied from 7.45 to 9.50 per cent, 6.76 to 12.87, 1.30 to 2.70, 2.80 to 3.33, 69.26 to 78.66 g/100 g and 346 to 358 kcal /100 g respectively. The micronutrients such as iron, calcium and zinc ranged between 2.90-9.37, 219- 426 and 2.56-6.86 mg/100 g respectively.OUAT-2 recorded highest iron (9.37 mg) and zinc (6.86 mg) while JWM-1 recorded highest calcium (426 mg). Processing methods significantly reduced the phytic acid, however successive decline was observed with increase in interval of soaking, malting and popping. Among the varieties, KMR 344 recorded significantly lowest phytic acid in all processing methods employed except for popping (GE6834-1).Among processing methods, malting significantly increased the per cent bioavailable iron (DHWFM 11-3) and calcium (KMR 344). Malt developed from KMR 344 and pop mix from GE 6834-1 received highest scores for organoleptic properties. July, 2015 Department of Food Science and Nutrition Dr. Usha Ravindra UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru-65 (Major Advisor) ©½ gÁV vÀ½UÀ¼À ¥Ë¶ÖPÀ ¸ÀAAiÉÆÃd£ É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀgÀ ªÀiË®åªÀzsÀð£É ¸ÉßúÁ ²ÃVºÀ½î ¥§Àæ AzsÀ ¸ÁgÁA±À gÁVAiÀÄÄ CzÀg À «²µÀÖ ¥Ë¶ÖPÁA±ÀU½À AzÁV QgÀÄ zsÁ£åÀUÀ¼°À è CvÀåAvÀ ¥ÀæªÄÀ ÄR ¸ÁÜ£Àª£À ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ CzåsÀAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ°è, J.L.¹.J¸ï.JA.L.¦. ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªjÀ AzÀ ¸ÀAUæÀ»¸À¯ÁzÀ ºÀ¢ªÄÀ ÆgÀÄ ©½ gÁV ºÁUÀÆ MAzÀÄ ZÉPï (PAÀ zÀÄ) vÀ½U¼À À°è ¨sËwP,À PÁAiÀÄðPÁjPÀ, ¥Ë¶ÖP,À ¥Ë¶ÖPÀ «gÉÆâü ºÁUÀÆ 1000 2.41-3.73 P©À ât ªÀÄvÄÀ Û ¸ÀÄtÚzÀ ®¨sÀåvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «±Éèö¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ. ©ÃdU¼À À vÀÆPÀ ªÀÄvÄÀ Û ¥ÀjªiÀ Át ( 3.12-3.83 0.61-0.75 UÁæA. ªÀÄvÄÀ Û «Ä.°Ã.), d®¸AÀ ZÀAiÀÄ£À ¸ÁªÀÄxÀåð ( ), G§ÄâªÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxåÀð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 1.32-1.89 0.40-0.56) 0.69-0.81 G§ÄâªÀ ¸ÀÆZåÀAP À ( ªÀÄvÄÀ Û , ¸ÁAzÀæv É ªÀÄvÄÀ Û UÀÄgÀÄvÀéªÅÀ ( UÁæA./«Ä.°Ã. 1.04-1.82 ªÀÄvÄÀ Û ) C¨Àså¹¹z À vÀ½U¼À À°è UÀªÄÀ £ÁºÀð ªÀåvÁå¸ÀªÅÀ PAÀ qÀħA¢vÀÄ. PÁAiÀÄðPÁjPÀ (0.70-0.86 UÀÄt®PëÀtUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¸ÁAzÀæv É UÁæA./«Ä.°Ã.), ¤ÃgÀÄ ªÀÄvÄÀ Û vÉÊ® »ÃjPÆÉ ¼ÀÄîªÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxåÀð, frØ£À ªÀiË®å, HvÀ ¸ÁªÀÄxåÀð ªÀÄvÄÀ Û PgÀ ÀUÄÀ ªÀ ¸ÀÆZåÀAPUÀ À¼ÄÀ UÀªÄÀ £ÁºÀðªÁV ©ü£ÀߪÁVªÉ. ¥Ë¶ÖP À ¸ÀAAiÉÆÃd£ÉU¼À ÁzÀ vÉêÁA±À, ¸À¸ÁgÀd£ÀP,À PÉƧÄâ, £Áj£ÁA±À, ±ÀPÀðgÀ¦µÀÖUÀ¼ÄÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ±ÀQÛ PæªÀ ÀĪÁV 7.45-9.50 6.26-12.27 1.30-2.70 2.80-3.33 69.26-78.66 ¥Àæw±Àv,À UÁæA. UÁæA. UÁæA. UÁæA. ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 346-358 100 Q.PÁå/ UÁæA gÀµÀÄÖ PAÀ qÀħA¢vÀÄ. C£ÀÄPæªÀ ÀĪÁV R¤dU¼À ÁzÀ PÀ©ât, ¸ÀÄtÚ ªÀÄvÄÀ Û «£À 2.90-9.37 219-426 2.56-6.86 100 ¸ÀvÄÀ ÀA±ÀªÅÀ , ªÀÄvÄÀ Û «Ä. UÁæA. ¥Àæw UÁæA. UÉ. PAÀ qÀħA¢vÀÄ. ¥sÉÊnPï DªÀÄèªÀÅ, UÀªÄÀ £ÁºÀðªÁV ¸ÀA¸ÌÀguÀ Á «zsÁ£UÀ À¼À°è PrÀ ªÉÄAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PAÀ qÀħA¢vÀÄ. ªÉƼÀPÉ §j¸ÄÀ ªÀ ºÁUÀÆ CgÀ¼ÄÀ ºÀÄjAiÀÄĪÀ ¸ÀªÄÀ AiÀÄ ºÉZÁÑzAÀ vÉ, ¥sÉÊnPï DªÀÄèzÀ ¥ÀæªiÀ Át UÀªÄÀ £ÁºÀðªÁV 11-3 344 PrÀ ªÉÄAiÀiÁ¬ÄvÄÀ . P©À ât (rºZÉ ïqÀ§ÄèJ¥sïJªÀiï ) ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄtÚzÀ (PJÉ ADgï ) eÉÊ«PÀ ºÉZÁÑV ®¨sÀåvÉAiÀÄÄ, G½z¯É Áè ¸ÀA¸ÌÀguÀ Á «zsÁ£UÀ À½VAvÀ ªÉƼÀPÉ §j¸ÄÀ ªÀ «zsÁ£Àz°À è UÀªÄÀ £ÁºÀðªÁV 344 6834-1 PAÀ qÀħA¢vÀÄ. PJÉ ADgï ¤AzÀ ºÁUÀÆ fE ¤AzÀ vÀAiÀiÁj¸®À àlÖ ºÀÄj»lÄÖ ºÉZÀÄÑ gÀÄaAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÀݪÀÅ. 2015 dįÊÉ, qÁ. GµÁ gÀ«ÃAzÀæ ¥ÉÆõÀuÉ DºÁgÀ «eÁÕ£À ªÄÀ vÀÄÛ «¨Ás UÀ ¥ÀæzÁs £À ¸À®ºÉUÁgÀgÄÀ PÀȶ «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀÄ, f.PÉ.«.PÉ. ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-560 065 CONTENTS CHAPTERS TITLE PAGE NO I INTRODUCTION 1-3 II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 4-20 III MATERIAL AND METHODS 21-29 IV EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 30-54 V DISCUSSION 55-66 VI SUMMARY 67-69 VII REFERENCES 70-80 ANNEXURES 81-93 LIST OF TABLES Table Page Title No. No. a Millet production across the globe 4 b The principle field crops of India 5 Quinquinnial area, production and productivity of small millets in c 5 India 1 Physical characteristics of white finger millet varieties 31 Correlation coefficient of physical characteristics of white finger 2 33 millet varieties 3 Functional characteristics of white finger millet varieties 35 Correlation coefficient of functional characteristics of white finger 4 37 millet varieties 5 Macronutrient composition of white finger millet varieties per 100 g 38 Correlation coefficient of functional characteristics and 6 40 macronutrient composition of white finger millet varieties 7 Micronutrient composition of white finger millet varieties per 100 g 41 Correlation coefficient of functional characteristics and 8 42 micronutrient composition of white finger millet varieties 9 Study of Processing methods on selected white finger millet varieties 43 Effect of processing methods on phytate content mg/100g in selected 10 44 white finger millet varieties Effect of popping on phytate content mg/100g in selected white 11 46 finger millet varieties. Impact of processing methods on bio availability of iron mg/100g in 12 48 selected white finger millet varieties

Description:
blessings. Thank you mom, dad, and all my family members for showing faith in me and .. Ksiconnect.icrisat.org) reveals that though India is the.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.