ebook img

Not Just for the Birds: Augury and Archaic Attic Vase Paintings by Sophia Taborski Submitted to the PDF

33 Pages·2015·0.29 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Not Just for the Birds: Augury and Archaic Attic Vase Paintings by Sophia Taborski Submitted to the

Not Just for the Birds: Augury and Archaic Attic Vase Paintings by Sophia Taborski Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelors of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Sophia Taborski It was defended on March 27, 2015 and approved by Nicholas Jones, Professor, Departments of Classics and History Verity Platt, Associate Professor, Department of Classics (Cornell University) Anne Weis, Associate Professor, H.C. Frick Department of the History of Art and Architecture Thesis Director: Mark Possanza, Associate Professor, Department of Classics ii Copyright © by Sophia Taborski 2015 iii NOT JUST FOR THE BIRDS: AUGURY AND ARCHAIC ATTIC VASE PAINTING Sophia Taborski University of Pittsburgh, 2015 With the exception of extispicy scenes catalogued by Francois Lissarrague and snake-eagle omens discussed by Diana Rodríguez Pérez, divination has been ignored by vase-painting scholars and of ancient religion scholars, only Michael Flower has touched on visual sources. Despite this lack of attention by current scholars, acts of divination and birds that I argue ought to be interpreted as omens appeared on hundreds of black figure Attic vases in the sixth century. Most of these bird omens were painted behind men on horseback. Henri Metzger examined a subset of this group, the funerary Rider Amphorae, and concluded that the riders were cavalry and the eagle an attribute of Zeus, the patron god of the cavalry. The riders’ armor suggests that horsemen were hoplites and because of the prominence of augury in everyday life, the birds are best identified as ambiguous omens. These bird omens add a future temporal dimension and emphasize the uncertainties of battle. By doing so, the Rider Amphorae highlighted the virtues of the horsemen and eulogized them at the tomb. Other vases with men on horseback were used in the symposium where the moment of the journey provided a common experience which fostered bonding among the symposiasts. The moment of a man embarking journey joined by a bird omen corresponds to Babylonian omens, the British Museum tablet 108874 and the Summa Alu, and may be explained as an example of a wider Mediterranean understanding of divination. Examining augury and bird portents in Attic vases provides insight into both the layman understanding of augury and the vase painter construction of narrative. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION: A SKYPHOS BY THE THESEUS PAINTER ........................ 1 1.1 IDENTIFYING BIRDS ON ATTIC VASES .................................................... 3 1.2 ATTIC VASES WITH BIRD PORTENTS ....................................................... 6 1.2.1 The Rider Amphorae....................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 The Ambush of Troilos.................................................................................. 10 1.2.3 Interpreting Bird Portents ............................................................................ 11 2.0 VEIWING CONTEXT: THE FUNERAL ............................................................... 16 2.1 VIEWING CONTEXT: THE TOMB .............................................................. 17 2.2 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 21 v PREFACE First and foremost, I would like to thank Prof. Anne Weis for enduring support, patience, and inspiration. It was her question about the function of roosters on the Mycenaean Warrior Krater in her Greek Art class that first sparked this thesis over a year and a half ago. In that class, she also opened my eyes to the possibility and efficacy of using material sources to study ancient culture, a lesson which I expect to carry with me throughout the rest of my career. She has been the best mentor any student could ask for, always making time to meet with me and guiding me on the road to academia. Anyone reading should be grateful to her as well, because were it not for her input over countless drafts, this thesis would have been triple the length with no more insight or information. I appreciate the time all of my committee members took to read my thesis and for their helpful feedback. Having been inspired by her work, I am beyond honored that Dr. Verity Platt was able to come to Pittsburgh for my defense, and I am thrilled to work with her in the years to come. Dr. Mark Possanza helped me to navigate tricky bureaucracy and has gone out of his way to answer any questions I have had. Dr. Nicholas Jones provided his expertise on Greek history. Many thanks are in order to Liz Conforti, who arranged my BPhil defense and has always done everything she could to support my academic efforts. I would like to thank the students and faculty of Classics department at the University of Pittsburgh, who have supported my project. Dr. Christina Hoenig, in addition to teaching me vi Greek (no small task!), has always dispensed valuable advice and encouraged my scholarly growth. I must also thank Dr. John Newell, who provided me with the "punny" title I have been using for over a year. Dr. Edwin Floyd helped me with Ionic Greek of the Ephesos inscription, and pointed me to valuable sources. In the History Department, I would like to thank Tony Novosel for four years of helpful advising and encouragement. I would also like to thank the Honors College and the Brackenridge Community for their support and inspiring insights. Dean Stricker has encouraged and supported my research endeavors since my first year at Pitt. This project would not have been completed without the support of the Office of Undergraduate Research and Patrick Mullen who has always helped me find opportunities to enhance my research. Gratitude is also due to my close friends, Thomas Helgerman, Simon Brown, Alex Grese, Erik Shell, and Isaac Freedman, who have always provided support and insight throughout twists and turns of my research process. My closest companion, Matt Hershey, has been a sounding board for my project at every stage and given me valuable feedback on many drafts, in addition to providing me with emotional support. Thanks are also in order to my brothers: Henry for his constant encouragement and interest, Glenn for always managing to "de-stress" me, and Sam for researching with me as I looked at "geek" vases. I greatly appreciate the support of my parents, Jeannine and Glenn Taborski, who have encouraged my intellectual curiosity since I could talk. I would like to dedicate my thesis to my grandma, Grace Schuster, who always believed in me and inspired me to never stop learning. Although all of these people have provided me with invaluable help and support, I take full responsibility for errors or omissions below, for they are mine and mine alone. vii viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION: A SKYPHOS BY THE THESEUS PAINTER A colossal bird perches on top of a boulder, its head bent over a hare; gore dribbles out of the bird’s beak; the hare’s neck is stained with blood. Two helmeted draped men sit on either side of the bird, fixated on the sight between them. This dramatic scene appears on a skyphos attributed to the Theseus Painter dated to the late sixth century.1 The reverse has a similar composition and theme.2 In the center of the field, a giant bird perches atop a rock, a snake clutched in its talons. Two helmeted men look directly at it and appear to talk, presumably about the sight between them. The size of the rock, the bird, and the snake are exaggerated so that the eagle stands at eye-level to the men. Some scholars have interpreted the boulder as the Delphic omphalos because of its large size, beehive shape, and added white around the outline of each stone.3 Regardless of the location of the stone, the size, central location, and attention given to birds by the male figures suggest that they are portents, an interpretation bolstered by their similarity with portents in the literary tradition.4 The bird and snake is reminiscent of Iliad 12.201-209: 1 Naples, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, inv. no. H2458 (BAPD 16211, Paralipomena 255 = http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/record/4F666A01-8993-49AB-BC13-A4E5895B498C). 2 The Theseus painter typically decorated both sides of vessels with similar scenes (Steiner 1997, 157-170, Borgers 2003, 29-30). 3 Harrison 1899, 225-227. These figures can only be seen in alternate photographs of the skyphos in Harrison (1899, 227) and BAPD 16211. 4The Delphic omphalos identification for the stone would bolster the argument that the birds are omens because of the obvious connection to prophecy. Furthermore, 8 of 36 bird scenes in the Iliad recount the birds on or near rocks, mountains, or cliffs (Johannson 2012, 228). 1 An eagle soaring high on the left veered closely towards the men, carrying a blood-red portentous (teloron) snake struggling for life- and it had not yet surrendered the fight, for it struck the chest of the eagle holding it right beside the eagle’s throat- the eagle doubled over backwards in pain. Writhing in pain, the eagle flung the snake on the ground, throwing it down in the midst of the crowd and shrieked as it flew away with a gust of wind. The Trojans shuddered, seeing how the serpent squirmed in their midst, a sign (teras) from aegis-bearing Zeus.5 The bird and hare bring to mind the famous omen from Aeschylus’ Agamemnon which prompted the sacrifice of Iphigenia: A frenzied bird of omen, the king of birds to the king of the ships: suddenly, one black and one white eagle appeared side by side near the rooftops, from the side of the spear- wielding hand. In a perch conspicuous to all, they feasted on a pregnant hare, begetting offspring, severing their final course of life.6 These two images do not line up perfectly with the two texts,7 but the parallels are too clear to ignore— the birds and their prey must be omens. While this is, to my knowledge, the most obvious example of bird omens in Athenian vase painting, it is not the only one. With exception of extispicy scenes catalogued by Francois Lissarrague, the snake-eagle omens examined by Diana Rodríguez-Pérez, and examples of divination discussed by Michael Flower, omens in vase-paintings have not been examined.8 I show how interpreting a bird as an omen in a popular motif of horsemen, provides us with a better understanding of narrative construction, the common tradition of augury, and what virtues were important to elite men. 5 Hom. Il. 12.200-209. 6 Aesch Ag. 111-120. Aeschylus also describes this as a teras in Ag. 125. 7 For example, the eagle in the Iliad flies with the snake before relinquishing it; the eagle in the skyphos remains on the boulder. There were two eagles in Agamemnon but only one on the skyphos; the hare in Agamemnon was pregnant, but the Theseus painter only paints the hare. 8 Lissarrague 1990, 55-69; Rodríguez Pérez 2011, 1-18; Flower 2008, 28, 34-5, 41, 48-9, 54-7, 98, 158, 163-4, 206-7, 213-5. 2

Description:
portents are ideas which I think hold true for ancient art in other periods and cultures which had a tradition of augury . In the Archaic and Classical eras, most ominous birds appear on Attic black figured meaning of this omen, however, is unclear.42 Beazley described it as “doubtless a good om
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.