Not Just for the Birds: Augury and Archaic Attic Vase Paintings by Sophia Taborski Submitted to the

33 Pages·2015·0.29 MB·English

Not Just for the Birds: Augury and Archaic Attic Vase Paintings

by
Sophia Taborski

Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the
Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelors of Philosophy

University of Pittsburgh
2015
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

This thesis was presented

by

Sophia Taborski

It was defended on
March 27, 2015
and approved by
Nicholas Jones, Professor, Departments of Classics and History
Verity Platt, Associate Professor, Department of Classics
(Cornell University)
Anne Weis, Associate Professor, H.C. Frick Department of the History of Art and
Architecture
Thesis Director: Mark Possanza, Associate Professor, Department of Classics

ii
Copyright © by Sophia Taborski
2015
iii
NOT JUST FOR THE BIRDS: AUGURY AND ARCHAIC ATTIC VASE PAINTING
Sophia Taborski
University of Pittsburgh, 2015

With the exception of extispicy scenes catalogued by Francois Lissarrague and snake-eagle
omens discussed by Diana Rodríguez Pérez, divination has been ignored by vase-painting
scholars and of ancient religion scholars, only Michael Flower has touched on visual sources.
Despite this lack of attention by current scholars, acts of divination and birds that I argue ought
to be interpreted as omens appeared on hundreds of black figure Attic vases in the sixth century.
Most of these bird omens were painted behind men on horseback. Henri Metzger examined a
subset of this group, the funerary Rider Amphorae, and concluded that the riders were cavalry
and the eagle an attribute of Zeus, the patron god of the cavalry. The riders’ armor suggests that
horsemen were hoplites and because of the prominence of augury in everyday life, the birds are
best identified as ambiguous omens. These bird omens add a future temporal dimension and
emphasize the uncertainties of battle. By doing so, the Rider Amphorae highlighted the virtues
of the horsemen and eulogized them at the tomb. Other vases with men on horseback were used
in the symposium where the moment of the journey provided a common experience which
fostered bonding among the symposiasts. The moment of a man embarking journey joined by a
bird omen corresponds to Babylonian omens, the British Museum tablet 108874 and the Summa
Alu, and may be explained as an example of a wider Mediterranean understanding of divination.
Examining augury and bird portents in Attic vases provides insight into both the layman
understanding of augury and the vase painter construction of narrative.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION: A SKYPHOS BY THE THESEUS PAINTER ........................ 1
1.1 IDENTIFYING BIRDS ON ATTIC VASES .................................................... 3
1.2 ATTIC VASES WITH BIRD PORTENTS ....................................................... 6
1.2.1 The Rider Amphorae....................................................................................... 7
1.2.2 The Ambush of Troilos.................................................................................. 10
1.2.3 Interpreting Bird Portents ............................................................................ 11
2.0 VEIWING CONTEXT: THE FUNERAL ............................................................... 16
2.1 VIEWING CONTEXT: THE TOMB .............................................................. 17
2.2 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 18
BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 21
v
PREFACE

First and foremost, I would like to thank Prof. Anne Weis for enduring support, patience, and
inspiration. It was her question about the function of roosters on the Mycenaean Warrior Krater
in her Greek Art class that first sparked this thesis over a year and a half ago. In that class, she
also opened my eyes to the possibility and efficacy of using material sources to study ancient
culture, a lesson which I expect to carry with me throughout the rest of my career. She has been
the best mentor any student could ask for, always making time to meet with me and guiding me
on the road to academia. Anyone reading should be grateful to her as well, because were it not
for her input over countless drafts, this thesis would have been triple the length with no more
insight or information. I appreciate the time all of my committee members took to read my
thesis and for their helpful feedback. Having been inspired by her work, I am beyond honored
that Dr. Verity Platt was able to come to Pittsburgh for my defense, and I am thrilled to work
with her in the years to come. Dr. Mark Possanza helped me to navigate tricky bureaucracy and
has gone out of his way to answer any questions I have had. Dr. Nicholas Jones provided his
expertise on Greek history. Many thanks are in order to Liz Conforti, who arranged my BPhil
defense and has always done everything she could to support my academic efforts.
I would like to thank the students and faculty of Classics department at the University of
Pittsburgh, who have supported my project. Dr. Christina Hoenig, in addition to teaching me
vi
Greek (no small task!), has always dispensed valuable advice and encouraged my scholarly
growth. I must also thank Dr. John Newell, who provided me with the "punny" title I have been
using for over a year. Dr. Edwin Floyd helped me with Ionic Greek of the Ephesos inscription,
and pointed me to valuable sources. In the History Department, I would like to thank Tony
Novosel for four years of helpful advising and encouragement.
I would also like to thank the Honors College and the Brackenridge Community for their
support and inspiring insights. Dean Stricker has encouraged and supported my research
endeavors since my first year at Pitt. This project would not have been completed without the
support of the Office of Undergraduate Research and Patrick Mullen who has always helped me
find opportunities to enhance my research.
Gratitude is also due to my close friends, Thomas Helgerman, Simon Brown, Alex Grese,
Erik Shell, and Isaac Freedman, who have always provided support and insight throughout twists
and turns of my research process. My closest companion, Matt Hershey, has been a sounding
board for my project at every stage and given me valuable feedback on many drafts, in addition
to providing me with emotional support. Thanks are also in order to my brothers: Henry for his
constant encouragement and interest, Glenn for always managing to "de-stress" me, and Sam for
researching with me as I looked at "geek" vases. I greatly appreciate the support of my parents,
Jeannine and Glenn Taborski, who have encouraged my intellectual curiosity since I could talk.
I would like to dedicate my thesis to my grandma, Grace Schuster, who always believed in me
and inspired me to never stop learning.
Although all of these people have provided me with invaluable help and support, I take
full responsibility for errors or omissions below, for they are mine and mine alone.

vii
viii
1.0 INTRODUCTION: A SKYPHOS BY THE THESEUS PAINTER
A colossal bird perches on top of a boulder, its head bent over a hare; gore dribbles out of
the bird’s beak; the hare’s neck is stained with blood. Two helmeted draped men sit on either
side of the bird, fixated on the sight between them. This dramatic scene appears on a skyphos
attributed to the Theseus Painter dated to the late sixth century.1 The reverse has a similar
composition and theme.2 In the center of the field, a giant bird perches atop a rock, a snake
clutched in its talons. Two helmeted men look directly at it and appear to talk, presumably about
the sight between them. The size of the rock, the bird, and the snake are exaggerated so that the
eagle stands at eye-level to the men. Some scholars have interpreted the boulder as the Delphic
omphalos because of its large size, beehive shape, and added white around the outline of each
stone.3 Regardless of the location of the stone, the size, central location, and attention given to
birds by the male figures suggest that they are portents, an interpretation bolstered by their
similarity with portents in the literary tradition.4 The bird and snake is reminiscent of Iliad
12.201-209:

1 Naples, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, inv. no. H2458 (BAPD 16211, Paralipomena 255 =
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/record/4F666A01-8993-49AB-BC13-A4E5895B498C).
2 The Theseus painter typically decorated both sides of vessels with similar scenes (Steiner 1997, 157-170, Borgers
2003, 29-30).
3 Harrison 1899, 225-227. These figures can only be seen in alternate photographs of the skyphos in Harrison
(1899, 227) and BAPD 16211.
4The Delphic omphalos identification for the stone would bolster the argument that the birds are omens because
of the obvious connection to prophecy. Furthermore, 8 of 36 bird scenes in the Iliad recount the birds on or near
rocks, mountains, or cliffs (Johannson 2012, 228).
1
An eagle soaring high on the left veered closely towards the men, carrying a blood-red
portentous (teloron) snake struggling for life- and it had not yet surrendered the fight, for
it struck the chest of the eagle holding it right beside the eagle’s throat- the eagle doubled
over backwards in pain. Writhing in pain, the eagle flung the snake on the ground,
throwing it down in the midst of the crowd and shrieked as it flew away with a gust of
wind. The Trojans shuddered, seeing how the serpent squirmed in their midst, a sign
(teras) from aegis-bearing Zeus.5

The bird and hare bring to mind the famous omen from Aeschylus’ Agamemnon which prompted
the sacrifice of Iphigenia:
A frenzied bird of omen, the king of birds to the king of the ships: suddenly, one black
and one white eagle appeared side by side near the rooftops, from the side of the spear-
wielding hand. In a perch conspicuous to all, they feasted on a pregnant hare, begetting
offspring, severing their final course of life.6

These two images do not line up perfectly with the two texts,7 but the parallels are too clear to
ignore— the birds and their prey must be omens.
While this is, to my knowledge, the most obvious example of bird omens in Athenian
vase painting, it is not the only one. With exception of extispicy scenes catalogued by Francois
Lissarrague, the snake-eagle omens examined by Diana Rodríguez-Pérez, and examples of
divination discussed by Michael Flower, omens in vase-paintings have not been examined.8 I
show how interpreting a bird as an omen in a popular motif of horsemen, provides us with a
better understanding of narrative construction, the common tradition of augury, and what virtues
were important to elite men.

5 Hom. Il. 12.200-209.
6 Aesch Ag. 111-120. Aeschylus also describes this as a teras in Ag. 125.
7 For example, the eagle in the Iliad flies with the snake before relinquishing it; the eagle in the skyphos remains on
the boulder. There were two eagles in Agamemnon but only one on the skyphos; the hare in Agamemnon was
pregnant, but the Theseus painter only paints the hare.
8 Lissarrague 1990, 55-69; Rodríguez Pérez 2011, 1-18; Flower 2008, 28, 34-5, 41, 48-9, 54-7, 98, 158, 163-4, 206-7,
213-5.
2