ebook img

Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Method for the Rapid Detection of gyrA and parC Mutations in Quinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. PDF

0.2 MB·English
by  KimJunyoung
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Method for the Rapid Detection of gyrA and parC Mutations in Quinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli and Shigella spp.

OsongPublicHealthResPerspect20123(2),113e117 doi:10.1016/j.phrp.2012.04.004 pISSN2210-9099 eISSN2233-6052 - - BRIEF REPORT Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction- Based Method for the Rapid Detection of gyrA and Mutations in Quinolone-Resistant parC and spp. Escherichia coli Shigella Junyoung Kima, Semi Jeon a, Hyungjun Kim a, Misun Park a, Soobok Kimb, Seonghan Kima,* aDivision of Enteric Bacterial Infections, Korea National Institute of Health, Osong, Korea. bKogene Biotech, Seoul, Korea. Received:December Abstract 19, 2011 Two real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were developed to detect Revised:January10, mutationsincodons83and87ingyrAandincodons80and91inparC,themain 2012 sitesthatcausesquinoloneresistanceinpathogenicEscherichiacoliandShigella Accepted: January16, spp. isolates. These assays can be employed as a useful method for controlling 2012 infectionscaused byquinolone-resistant EcoliandShigella isolates. KEYWORDS: fluoroquinolone, gyrA, multiplexreal-timePCR, parC 1. Introduction Resistance to fluoroquinolones is mainly caused by mutations in the quinolone-resistance determining Fluoroquinolone is highly effective against enteric regions (QRDRs) of gyrA and parC, which encode the Gram-negative bacteria [1]. Within a short period of GyrA and ParC proteins, respectively [5]. Most time, however, the widespread use of this drug has quinolone-resistant isolates have at least one gyrA resulted in the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant, mutation, and many have additional gyrA and/or parC Gram-negative bacteria [2e4]. mutations [2,3]. Mutations in the gyrA amino acid codons for Ser83 and/or Asp87 are commonly found in *Correspondingauthor. E-mail:[email protected] ThisisanOpenAccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNon-CommercialLicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited. Copyrightª2012KoreaCentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention.PublishedbyElsevierKoreaLLC.Allrightsreserved. 114 J. Kim, et al fluoroquinolone-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria [6]. 0.2mMofeachprimer,0.5mMofeachprobe,and10mL Targeted mutations are also frequently present in parC of RT-PCR master mix (Kogen Biotech, Seoul, Korea). inquinolone-resistantGram-negativebacteria,including All of the assays used the same thermocycling param- mutationsinthecodonsforSer80,Glu84,and/orArg91 eters. The reactions were performed in a LightCycler [7,8]. Mutations in gyrA or parC have less of an effect 480 system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) on resistance in Gram-negative bacteria by themselves under the following conditions: one cycle of 50(cid:2)Cfor 5 than they do when found in combination with other minutes followed by 40 cycles of 95(cid:2)C for 15 seconds mutations in these genes [9]. and 60(cid:2)C for 1 minute. Currently, nucleotide sequencing is a common methodfortheidentificationofmutationsintheQRDRs of gyrA and parC. Despite the widespread use of 3. Results sequencing, it is slow and expensive [10]. Various alternative methods to replace sequencing have been After optimizing each assay, 14 Shigella spp. strains proposed, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- with known mutations in gyrA and/or parC were tested restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [11], using the Gyr and Par assays. All of the known muta- real-time(RT)-baseddetection[12],andsingle-stranded tions at Ser83 and Asp87 were successfully detected in conformation polymorphism (SSCP) [13]. the gyrA mutants using the Gyr assay: 10 strains had Our objective was to develop a quicker method for mutationsatSer83andonestrainhadamutationatboth the detection of quinolone resistance-related mutations Ser83 and Asp87. Additionally, all of the known at the gyrA codons of Ser83 and Asp87 and the parC mutations in Ser80 and Arg87 were successfully detec- codons of Ser80 and Arg91 in quinolone-resistant ted in the parC mutants using the Par assays. We Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. isolates. This tech- assessed PCR amplification in all of the mutant isolates nique is based on the detection of fluorescent emissions (i.e.,thosethatdidnotemitfluorescence).Amplification from the PCR products of wild-type gyrA and parC; ofboththe78-basepair(bp)GyrassayPCRproductand isolateswithmutationsatspecificsitesingyrAandparC the 98-bp Par assay PCR product were confirmed in all do not emit detectable fluorescence. of the tested isolates using electrophoresis (data not shown). To determine the accuracies of the RT-PCR assays, 2. Materials and Methods 48 strains of quinolone-resistant pathogenic E coli and 14 S flexneri isolates were tested using both the Gyr The isolates used in this study are listed in Table 1. and Par assays. The fluorescent signals generated from Quinolone-resistant pathogenic E coli and Shigella spp. the RT-PCR Gyr and Par assays were analyzed to isolates were obtained from the National Public Health determine the presence of mutations in gyrA and/or NetworkofKorea.Eachisolatewasidentifiedaccording parC. The PCR results were confirmed by sequencing. to the Giraud method with some modifications [14]. All of the PCR results corresponded 100% with the Two multiplex PCR assays were developed to detect sequencing results (Table 1). Notably, in strain QR24, mutations in the QRDRs of gyrA and parC. In the first a fluorescent signal was detected with the Par assay, assay(namedGyr),TaqmanMGBprobesweredesigned but sequencing revealed a mutation in parC codon to detect wild-type nucleotide sequences corresponding Ala81; however, this mutation at codon Ala81 did not tothecodonsofSer83andAsp87ingyrA;inthesecond affect the PCR results. assay(namedPar),probesweredesignedtodetectwild- type nucleotide sequences corresponding to the codons of Ser80 and Agr87 in parC. Selective probes for both 4. Discussion assaysweredesignedusingPrimerExpress(version3.0; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to detect Resistance to quinolone is caused by a variety of mutationsinthesecondbaseoftheeachtargetedcodon. mechanisms, such as a mutation in the targeted Template DNA was prepared from each isolate by enzyme’s coding sequence, participation of the efflux boiling in 100 mL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) for 10 system, and the actions of qnr [15]. Compared with minutes. The primers were synthesized by Bioneer other quinolone-resistance mechanisms, the largest (Seoul, Korea), and the probes were synthesized by contributingfactortoresistanceisalterationofthetarget Applied Biosystems. For each assay set, the probe for sequence. Thus, the fast, precise detection of mutations one allele was labeled with FAM (6-carboxy-fluores- in the QRDRs of the target enzymes is very important cein) and the other was labeled with VIC (4,7,20-tri- for controlling infections caused by quinolone-resistant chloro-70-phenyl-6-carboxyfluorescein). The primers strains [9]. and probes used in this study are shown in Table 2. The RT-PCR assay developed for this study can AllofthePCRassayswereusedinafinalvolumeof simultaneously identify mutations in specific regions of 20 mL that contained 5 mL of template DNA with the gyrA and parC genes. Compared with similar PCR Detection of gyrA and parC Mutations 115 Table1. MICandnucleotidechangesintheQRDRsofthegyrAandparCgenesofquinolone-resistantstrainsofEscherichia coliand Shigellaspp RT-PCR assaya gyrAamino acid atcodon parCaminoacid atcodon MIC Gyr Par 83 87 80 91 Strain no. Species CIPb 83 87 80 91 TCG (Ser) GAC (Asp) TCG (Ser) CGA(Arg) 982962 S sonnei 1.0 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 994263 S sonnei 0.125 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 990379 S flexneri 0.25 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 990036 S flexneri 0.5 þ þ þ - — — — -AG(Gln) 000207 S sonnei 0.25 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 000784 S flexneri 0.125 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 013008 S sonnei 0.25 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 020065 S sonnei 0.25 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 021586 S sonnei 0.5 þ þ þ - — — — -AG(Gln) 020369 S flexneri 0.5 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — 021787 S flexneri 16 - þ - - -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 021895 S flexneri 8 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 022149 S flexneri 0.5 þ þ þ - — — — -AG(Gln) QR01 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR02 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR03 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR04 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG (Gln) QR05 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR06 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR07 Ecoli 64 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR08 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR09 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR10 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR11 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR12 E coli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR13 Ecoli 6 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR14 Ecoli 6 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR15 Ecoli 32 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR16 Ecoli 6 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR17 Ecoli 32 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR18 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR19 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR20 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR21 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR22 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR23 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR24 Ecoli 32 - þ þ þ -T-(Leu) — — — QR25 Ecoli 128 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR26 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR27 Ecoli 8 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR28 Ecoli 6 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR29 Ecoli 256 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR30 Ecoli 8 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR31 E coli 256 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR32 Ecoli 128 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR33 Ecoli 256< - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR34 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR35 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR36 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR37 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR38 Ecoli 128 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — QR39 Ecoli 128 - - - þ -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) — (Continued onnext page) 116 J. Kim, et al Table 1(Continued) RT-PCR assaya gyrAamino acid atcodon parCaminoacid atcodon MIC Gyr Par 83 87 80 91 Strain no. Species CIPb 83 87 80 91 TCG (Ser) GAC (Asp) TCG (Ser) CGA(Arg) QR40 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR41 Ecoli 64 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) QR42 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR43 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR44 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR45 Ecoli 6 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR46 Ecoli 4 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR47 Ecoli 3 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — QR48 Ecoli 32 - þ - þ -T-(Leu) — G–(Ile) — 100020 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100053 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100054 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100377 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100378 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100379 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) A–(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100449 S flexneri 16 - - - - -T-(Leu) A–(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100781 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100782 S flexneri 16 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 100985 S flexneri 16 - - - - -T-(Leu) A–(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 101464 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 102724 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 102725 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) -G-(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) 102726 S flexneri 4 - - - - -T-(Leu) A–(Gly) G–(Ile) -AG(Gln) aþ,emittedfluorescenc;bCIP,Ciprofloxacin;-,didnotemitfluorescence. detection methods developed for use in other studies detected mutations in the first base pair of the targeted that can only identify one or two mutated sites in gyrA codon. Therefore, the Par assay can also be influenced and parC, this RT-PCR assay is relatively simple and by silent mutations in the target site. fast. This assay cannot identify mutations outside of the In the accuracy test for quinolone-resistantS flexneri four target sites (codons 83 and 87 in gyrA and codons isolates, this assay detected different types of mutations 81and90inparC).Also,itcannotidentifymutationsin at gyrA codon 87. In 10 strains, the codon was mutated gyrB or parE. However, most mutations that influence fromasparticacid(GAC)toglycine(GGC);intheother quinolone resistance usually include one or more of four strains, the codon was mutated to asparagine these four target sites. Identification of mutations at (AAC). This assay was designed to detect mutations in these four target sites is sufficient to explain the resis- the second base pair of each targeted codon, but it also tance mechanism of quinolone-resistant isolates. Table 2. Primerand probesequences for theSNPs tests Target gene Primer Sequence(5’/3’) gyrA Detection primer F TGGTGACGTAATCGGTAAATACCA Detection primer R GAATGGCTGCGCCATACG SNP83detection probe(FAM) FAM-TGACTCGGCGGTTT- MGBNF SNP87detection probe(VIC) VIC-ACGATAGTGTCATAAAC-MGBNF parC Detection primer F GACGTACTGGGTAAATACCATCCG Detection primer R TCAACCAGCGGATAACGGTAA SNP80detection probe(FAM) FAM-GCGATAGCACCTGT-MGBNFQ SNP91detection probe(VIC) VIC-AGAACGGTCGCGCC-MGBNFQ Detection of gyrA and parC Mutations 117 In conclusion, we developed a simple and efficient isolates of Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae. Diag RT-PCRassaythatsimultaneouslydetectsthemajorgyrA MicrobiolInfectDiseases2002;42:257e61. 7. Jung D, Lee M, Kim J, et al. Isolation of quinolone-resistant andparCmutationsrelatedtoquinoloneresistance.This Escherichia coli found in major rivers in Korea. J Microbiol. assay can be easily applied to laboratory-based surveil- 2006;44:680e4. lancesystemsasasubstitutemethodforDNAsequencing. 8. Kim J, Kim S, Jeon S,et al.Resistance to fluoroquinolonesby the combination of target site mutations and enhanced Acknowledgements expression of genes for efflux pumps in Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei strains isolated in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14:760e5. This study was supported by a grant from the Korea 9. Heaton VJ, Ambler JE, Fisher LM. Potent antipneumococcal CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention.Theauthors activityofgemifloxacinisassociatedwithdualtargetingofgyrase declare that they have no conflicting interests related to andtopoisomeraseIV,aninvivotargetpreferenceforgyrase,and enhanced stabilization of cleavable complexes in vitro. Anti- this work. microbAgentsChemother2000;44:3112e7. 10. RodrigoA,EstibalizM,RomonC.DetectionofparCmutationin References Streptococcus pneumonia by real-time PCR and Taqman-MGB probes.JMicrobiolMethod2007;69:214e7. 1. HooperDC.Newusesfornewandoldquinolonesandthechal- 11. LysnyanskyI,MikulaI,GerchmanI,LevisohnS.Rapiddetection lengeofresistance.ClinInfectDis2000;30:243e54. of a point mutation in the parC gene associated with decreased 2. Nakamura S. Mechanism of quinolone resistance. J Infect Che- susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma bovis. Anti- mother1997;3:128e38. microbAgentsChemother2009;53:4911e4. 3. LautenbachE,StromBL,NachamkinI,etal.LongitudinalTrends 12. PageS,VernelPF,O’ConneorO,etal.Real-timePCRdetection in fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates of gyrA and parC mutation in Streptococcus pneumonia. Anti- from inpatients and outpatients, 1989e2000: differences in the microbAgentsChemother2008;52:4155e8. emergenceandepidemiologyofresistanceacrossorganisms.Clin 13. Deborah JE, Ernesto L, Martin JW, Laura JP. Detection gyrA InfectDis2004;38:655e62. mutations in quinolone-resistant Salmonellaenteric by denaturin 4. UchidaY,MochimaruT,MorokumaY,etal.Geographicdistri- high-peformanceliquidchromatography.JClinMicrobiol.2002; bution of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli strains in 40:4121e5. Asia.IntJAntimicrobAgents2010;35:358e73. 14. Giraud E, Brisabois A, Martel JL, Chaslus DE. Comparative 5. Drlica K, Zhao X. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the studiesofmutationsinanimalisolatesandexperimentalinvitro 4-quionoloe.MicrobiolMolBiolRev1997;61:377e92. andinvivo-selectedmutantsofSalmonellaspp.suggestacounter 6. RuizJ,GomezJ,NaviaMM,etal.Highprevalenceofnalidixic selection of highly fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in the field. acidresistantciprofloxacinsusceptiblephenotypeamongclinical AntimicrobAgentsChemother1999;43:2131e7.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.