ebook img

Monthly ground water sampling results, Livingston Rail Yard, Livingston, Montana PDF

108 Pages·1992·3.5 MB·English
by  EnviroconInc
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Monthly ground water sampling results, Livingston Rail Yard, Livingston, Montana

628.161 M26gsr > 4lh sp.T^ cgllect;C 1992 MOV/ 1: 1S93 .MONTANA STATE LIBRARY 1515 E. 6th AVE. HELENA, MONTANA 59S20 Fourth Quarter 1992 Ground Water Sampling Results Livingston Rail Yard Montana Livingston, Submitted to: Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences Solid and Hazardous Waste Bureau Cogswell Building Helena, Montana 59620 Submitted by: Burlington Northern Railroad 9401 Indian Creek Parkway Overland Park, Kansas 66201 Prepared by: Envirocon, Inc. P.O. Box 8243 Missoula, Montana 59807 Submittal Date: February 1993 18, i i EN^HROCON, INC 3 0864 1006 6776 8 ^ ' , - ?v INTRODUCTION 1.0 This report presents the results of ground water samples collected within and aroimd the Livingston Rail Yard, in Livingston, Montana, during the fourth quarter of 1992. Ground water sampling for this quarter consisted ofthe November semiannual sampling event. Bxirlington Northern Railroad’s revised Ground Water Sampling Plan, instituted in July 1992, does not require groimd water sampling during October or December. RESULTS 2.0 The samples were analyzed by Energy Laboratories, Inc. in Billings, Montana. Results for the November semiannual sampling event are presented below. 2.1 November 1992 Semiannual Groimd Water Sampling Event The November 1992 semiannual sampling event was conducted on November 24 through December 1992. Twenty-two samples were analyzed 2, as part ofthis event: 19 primary samples and two duplicate samples collected at monitoring weUs within and aroimd the Livingston Rail Yard and one trip blank. The locations ofthese wells are shown on Figure 1.0. All saimples were analyzed for purgeable halocarbons by EPA Method 601. Tables 1, 2, 3, amd 4 summarize quarterly analytical results for tetrachloroethene (PCE); trichloroethene (TCE); cis-l,2-dichloroethene (DCE); and chlorobenzene, respectively. Laboratory analytical results and a data validation report for this sampling event are in Appendix A. Monitoring Well LS-8 was abandoned during sludge removal at the overflow pond in October 1992 and therefore could not be saimpled during the November 1992 semiannual sampling round. 1 » : ' ‘ : :* y W : "; '.j ' / m "‘^1 ^ , tf.-'dw-.^' • .i ' '' . #0 ,,'m- , '.i. ,,.y.^,.-Oi' 1 • ^ E i'> 4 v<«- ' _ '• '.-. I l> r} , In™,,'’. j... .Ii'j».u.>w Vfi.. '•'Hi.'••-l•'•..[' -;?Vv 1 '- ;! '-i.’;v, •'• . ' A.i.«‘^..».{^v,f’e'i4- 4'/i.‘ -‘-'^ .'J"/"'-. .. . - ..•'?WA. ' . ..'; 'A - )V!.,’:-..'' ' > ;. t•V).' jii. L- i(.. .'Kr,v*^’'' »’> Vi - :• r'- V .v .I'yJij ™£yj M,dQ. 4^^.imui'y .jc ... ' ’ i‘. '; ...A- •• V '»J> »r' fiSlI• ..'ilp ’if -'^i- ;V'^I .V •' •i . '' ' ' - , --rt’V '•>'; --, -• VV >?. r''4^.4 'ip " ' ' ' 1 ' • • ' ' ‘ <; •.4 '. 4V '. . ' ^ V .t: ' -'^V";'V' VUftMf:. ^ 'l^'" 1 ‘‘fU. . 1? ' V ' , "fl. '.ffl •r 1 '4oV, C.-„i V. ft. 1# '; ', \:}.d .r' 'S* ' ' ' ** )'' ' ' 1 . ,, .'I ,, ' ik'_il'!_'. » All other monitoring wells listed for semiannual sampling in the revised Ground Water SampHng Plan were sampled during November 1992. Most of the ground water samples collected during the November 1992 semiannual sampling round contained dissolved chlorinated-VOC concentrations that continued the general decline observed during the past three years. Notable concentration changes in wells with sufficient previous sample data are described below. The November 1992 PCE concentration in the sample from Monitoring Well L-87-5 was 72 parts per billion (ppb). This is 53 percent lower them the average PCE concentration at this well in the past year and 76 percent lower than the average PCE concentration at this well between May 1989 and May 1992, reported in the Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report (FDRI). The November 1992 PCE concentration in the sample from Monitoring Well 89-9 was 130 ppb. This is 30 percent lower than the average PCE concentration at this well in the past year and 50 percent lower than the average PCE concentration at this well between February 1990 and May 1992, reported in the FDRI. The November 1992 PCE concentration in the sample from Monitoring Well 92-1 was 160 ppb. As shown on Table PCE concentrations at this weU 1, have shown a decline from the 850-ppb value measured in February 1992 prior to the installation of a soil vapor extraction system at the Locomotive Shop manways. The sample from Monitoring Well 92-3 did not contain any detectable VOCs during the November 1992 s£unpUng round. This well was installed in July 1992 to investigate VOC concentrations in this part of the LRY. As 2 Digitized by the Internet Archive 2015 in https://archive.org/details/monthlygroundwat1992mont shown on Table the only previous sample collected at this location (August 1, 1992) contained 1.2 ppb of PCE. 2.2 Free-Product Thickness Measurements Free-product thicknesses were measured at wells sampled within the free-product plume during the November 1992 semiannual samphng round. However, a more complete set of free-product thickness measurements were taken in early January 1993. January 1993 measurements also included wells that were part of the pilot-scale hydrocarbon recovery system and the trench recovery system. Therefore, the early January 1993 measurements were used to construct Figure 2.0, showing the product thicknesses in the free-product plume. 3 V” r '*'•>. t.1. ' -YSv'- “»'••* .V.W; • ‘-'i'-;’ -JA^‘ !- . "\!^ -*i.ii' ./ ' * f '«0 - -i*V»,<U. * S ' -'- V j -: /'••jK t'-i .. i .. u.'J,'.--:^ --4\<'i'?t 'MiU’ 'I;;* S'-Hfi 'ml. !f^ '- '/ • *' S^-'‘> O '^ <V'v7 A‘h:. •’'* c i FIGURES <• p •

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.