L I OW MPACT D 2010 EVELOPMENT R W C EDEFINING ATER IN THE ITY PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE April 11–14, 2010 San Francisco, California SPONSORED BY Low Impact Development Technical Committee Urban Water Resources Research Council Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS California State Water Resources Control Board California Storm Water Quality Association (CASQA) EDITED BY Scott Struck, Ph.D. Keith Lichten, P.E. Published by the American Society of Civil Engineers Copyright and Disclaimer ISBN: 978-0-7844-1099-8 Any statements expressed in these materials are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ASCE, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein. No reference made in this publication to any specific method, product, process, or service constitutes or implies an endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by ASCE. The materials are for general information only and do not represent a standard of ASCE, nor are they intended as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal document. ASCE makes no representation or warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or utility of any information, apparatus, product, or process discussed in this publication, and assumes no liability therefore. This information should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application. Anyone utilizing this information assumes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infringement of any patent or patents. ASCE and American Society of Civil Engineers—Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Photocopies and permissions. Permission to photocopy or reproduce material from ASCE publications can be obtained by sending an e-mail to [email protected] or by locating a title in ASCE's online database (http://cedb.asce.org) and using the "Permission to Reuse" link. Bulk reprints. Information regarding reprints of 100 or more copies is available at http://www.asce.org/reprints. Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Civil Engineers. All Rights Reserved. American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE International Headquarters 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, VA 20191-4400 USA Call Toll-Free in the U.S.: 1-800-548-2723 (ASCE) Call from anywhere in the world: 1-703-295-6300 Internet: http://www.pubs.asce.org Preface A number of national and regional Low Impact Development (LID) Conferences have been held in the United States, including the September 2004 conference hosted by the University of Maryland, College Park, the March 2007 conference hosted by North Carolina State University in Wilmington, NC, and most recently the 2008 International LID Conference in Seattle, Washington. The 2010 conference was organized to continue to expand this regional and national dialogue to a global scale and to highlight new and continuing work including research, case studies, social dimensions, and community adoption of LID throughout the United States and other parts of the world. The conference addresses a number of interrelated objectives that include: • To promote the use of LID as an effective alternative for or integrated with traditional stormwater management, as well as to examine successful watershed management practices related to protection of streams through hydromodification. • To consider how changes in the traditional urban drainage design paradigm interconnect with ideas of sustainability and green building and help create a constituency for more livable and sustainable cities. • To inform practitioners throughout the country on strategies to address and go beyond common impediments for implementation of these techniques • To accelerate change in the practice of stormwater management, including an information exchange that intends to refine design processes, review procedures, and evaluate construction standards related to LID technologies • To improve our collective understanding of how vegetation helps manage stormwater, intercept precipitation, expand urban greenspace, and improve urban livability The technical papers included in these proceedings address a very broad range of topics that are relevant to sustainable approach to stormwater management using the Low Impact Development technology. These topics include: (cid:153) LID and Sustainability • Green Infrastructure • Quantifying Social and Environmental Costs and Benefits • Using LID to Help Mitigate Impacts of Climate Change on Stormwater and Wastewater Systems • LID Implementation and Public Health • LID and Smart Growth • LID and New Urbanism • LID and LEED (cid:153) Overcoming Institutional and Other Barriers to LID Implementation • Incentive Programs and Public Acceptance • Maintenance Agreements between Public and Private Entities • Modifications to Existing Codes and Ordinances (cid:153) Codes, Regulations, Constraints, Guidelines • Successful Collaborative Funding Approaches to LID • LID and Commercial Retail • LID Ordinance Review and Model Ordinance Examples • Model LID Codes (cid:153) Recent Monitoring/Performance Findings • LID and Integrated Practice Monitoring • Ecoroof/Greenroof Monitoring • LID Hydromodification Benefits • Other LID Facility Monitoring (cid:153) Computational Methods • Analysis Considerations for a Successful LID Application • Comparisons of Existing Computational Methods • LID Facility Modeling – Parcel, Block, and Development Scale • Integrated Practice Modeling (cid:153) Advances in LID BMP Design Methods – Lessons Learned • Bioretention Design, Construction, Soil Composition, and Infiltration • Green Roofs: Research Design, Implementation, and Construction • Permeable Pavements • Rainwater Harvesting and Other Beneficial Uses • Bioswales • Water Reuse and Harvesting • Urban Trees • Proprietary and Enterprise Technologies (cid:153) Site Design Considerations • Site Design and Analysis Considerations for a Successful LID Application • Architecture of LID - Making it Look Great! • Incorporating LID into Ultra-Urban and Highway Applications (cid:153) LID Incentives for New Development • Incentives for Developer Use of LID? • Traditional vs. LID Cost Comparison • LID Education and Engagement; Design Communities, Businesses, and Public Stakeholders • Financing to Encourage LID • Exemplary Case Studies • Creative Applications of LID Nationally and Internationally (cid:153) Watershed Retrofit with LID • Restoring the Urban Watershed: LID and Stream Restoration • CSO Control and LID • Exemplary Case Studies • Brownfields LID Implementation • Site Constraints: Contaminated Soil or Groundwater • Incorporating LID Into Street Retrofits (cid:153) Education, Training Outreach • LID Education, Training, Outreach with Single-Family Residents • Community and Neighborhood Involvement and Acceptance of LID • Financing/Incentives Programs • Exemplary Case Studies with Single-Family Residents • Commercial/Industrial/Incentives Programs • Exemplary Case Studies with Commercial/Industrial Owners (cid:153) Long-Term Performance, Maintenance • Maintenance Practices for LID • Partnering on Vegetation Maintenance • Maintenance Costs • Failure Examples and Restoration Costs Acknowledgments These proceedings, Low Impact Development 2010: Redefining Water in the City, contain the summaries of papers presented at the 2010 Low Impact Development Conference held in San Francisco, California, April 11-14, 2010. This conference would not have been possible without the contributions of all the authors and the Planning Committee, which is identified below: Co-Chairs Keith Lichten Scott Struck San Francisco Bay Regional Water Tetra Tech, Inc. Quality Board Golden, Colorado Oakland, California [email protected] [email protected] Conference Planning Committee Michael Clar Lisa Austin New Castle County, Delaware Geosyntec Jill Bicknell Sarah Minick EOA, Inc. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Rosey Jencks San Francisco Public Utilities Brian Parsons Commission ASCE/EWRI Executive Director Tom Liptan Autumn Richter City of Portland, Oregon ASCE/EWRI Manager Barbara L. Hickman Peter Mangarella ASCE Conference Manager Geosyntec Proceedings Review Committee Jill Bicknell EOA, Inc. Dwane Jones North Carolina State University Michael Clar New Castle County, Delaware Jinx Kuehn Clean Water Services Bethany Eisenberg Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) Keith Lichten San Francisco Bay Regional Water Elizabeth Fassman Quality Control Board University of Auckland William Lucas Darla Inglis Griffith University, Australia The Low Impact Development Center, Inc. Daniel Medina CH2M Hill Liv Haselbach Washington State University Marcus Quigley Geosyntec Bill Hunt North Carolina State University Jeff Rice Urban Systems Rosey Jencks San Francisco Public Utilities David Sample Commission Virginia Tech Rick Johnson Scott Struck Seattle Public Utilities Tetra Tech, Inc. Table of Contents A National Assessment of Rainwater Harvesting: Challenges, Needs, and Recommendations Demonstration and Monitoring of Rainwater Harvesting Technology in North 1 Carolina K. M. DeBusk, J. D. Wright, and W. F. Hunt Do Rainwater Harvesting Objectives of Water Supply and Stormwater 11 Management Conflict? Mark A. Jensen, Jennifer Steffen, Steven J. Burian, and Christine Pomeroy Rainwater Harvesting from Roofs for Non-Potable Reuse 21 Natasha Nicholson, Shirley E. Clark, Brett V. Long, Christina Y. S. Siu, Julia Spicher, and Kelly A. Steele Advances in LID BMP Design Methods—Lessons Learned A Methodology for Using Rainwater Harvesting as a Stormwater Management 31 BMP J. Alex Forasté and David Hirschman ASCE-EWRI Permeable Pavement Technical Committee—Introduction of 45 Committee Goals and Chapter 1 of Guidelines Design Considerations Common to All Permeable Pavements Bethany E. Eisenberg Best Practices for Maximum Beneficial Use of Rainwater 51 Bobby Markowitz Considerations in Selecting a (Bio)filtration Media to Optimize Lifespan and 63 Pollutant Removal Shirley E. Clark and Robert Pitt Estimation of Green Roof Evapotranspiration—Experimental Results 74 Meghan Feller, Robert Traver, and Bridget Wadzuk Impact of Maintenance and (Im)Properly Sizing Bioretention on Hydrologic 82 and Water Quality Performance Robert A. Brown and William F. Hunt In Situ Bioretention Design Concept 96 Michael Clar Introduction to Permeable Friction Course (PFC) Asphalt 104 A. Braga and C. Connolly Maintenance and Repair Options for Pervious Concrete 113 John Kevern Measure Twice, Build Once: Bench-Scale Testing to Evaluate Bioretention 126 Media Design Emilie K. Stander, Michael Borst, Thomas P. O’Connor, and Amy A. Rowe Permeable Pavement Demonstration at the Edison Environmental Center 139 Amy A. Rowe, Michael Borst, Thomas P. O’Connor, and Emilie K. Stander Permeable Pavement Performance over 3 Years of Monitoring 152 Elizabeth A. Fassman and Sam Blackbourn Pervious Asphalt Roads and Parking Lots: Stormwater Design Considerations 166 A. L. Broadsword and C. A. Rhinehart Pervious Concrete Testing Methods 180 Liv Haselbach Pervious Pavement Systems in Florida—Research Results 193 Manoj B. Chopra, Erik Stuart, and Martin P. Wanielista Replacing Incised Headwater Channels and Failing Stormwater Infrastructure 207 with Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance Ted Brown, Joe Berg, and Keith Underwood The Urban Green BioFilter: An Innovative Tree Box Application 218 James H. Lenhart, Scott A. deRidder, and Vaikko Allen Case Studies Case Study of LID Application and Design Method—Rain Harvesting for 234 Waterscape and Water Balance Analysis Wei Feng, Wu Che, Jianlong Wang, and Junqi Li Creating a LID Environment in an Ultra Urban Setting 244 Larry John Matel Effects of Minimum-Intervention-Design to Urban Waterfront Park in China: 252 An Application of POE Dihua Li, Jing Zhao, Jiewu Liu, Donghan Zhao, and Yanling Xu Green Infrastructure for CSO Control in Kansas City, Missouri 264 S. D. Struck, R. I. Field, R. Pitt, D. O’Bannon, E. Schmitz, M. A. Ports, T. Jacobs, and G. Moore Implementing Low Impact Development for Sustainable Transportation 276 Infrastructure in King County, Washington J. F. Sussex 287 Integrated Stormwater Facility Design to Address Hydromodification on a College Campus, Livermore, California Lucas Paz, William Beaman, and Hans Kramer Brickyard Park and Ride Case Study: Pervious Asphalt and Integrated Site 299 Stormwater Design C. A. Rhinehart and A. L. Broadsword Roadside Stormwater Master Plan Using Low Impact Development (LID) 312 J. L. Wang, W. Che, W. Zhang, J. Q. Li, and H. X. Yi Using Landscape Plants for Phytoremediation 323 Mindy Ruby and Bonnie Appleton Management, Design, and Development of Irrigation System in Desert 333 Regions Case Study:Bagh-E-Shazdeh (Prince Garden) A.K. Hosseini Vahdat Coast to Coast, Integration of Stormwater Management with the Urban Landscape/Impacts on Organizational Culture Green Streets in Southern California: Transformation of Basic Street 347 Infrastructure to a Conversation of Beauty and Environmental Enhancements Ken J. Susilo and Calvin Abe Computational Methods A Non-Dimensional Modeling Approach for Evaluation of Low Impact 362 Development from Water Quality to Flood Control T. Andrew Earles, James Guo, Ken MacKenzie, Jane Clary, and Shannon Tillack A Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in Western Washington 372 A. Lancaster An Innovative Decision Support System for Quantifying and Optimizing 385 Benefits of Decentralized BMPs for Los Angeles County Youn Sim, Stephen Carter, John Riverson, and Jenny Zhen Comparison of BMP Infiltration Simulation Methods 398 Jenny Zhen, Mow-Soung Cheng, John Riverson, Khalid Alvi, and Tham Saravanapavan Curve Numbers and Urban Runoff Modeling—Application Limitations 405 Robert N. Eli and Samuel J. Lamont Effectiveness Site Design and Low-Impact Development on Stormwater 419 Runoff Patterns at Partridgeberry Place LID Subdivision Renee Fitsik