L t N R et hem ot etuRN War and Genocide General Editors: Omer Bartov, Brown University; A. Dirk Moses, University of Sydney In recent years there has been a growing interest in the study of war and geno- cide, not from a traditional military history perspective, but within the framework of social and cultural history. This series offers a forum for scholarly works that reflect these new approaches. “The Berghahn series Studies on War and Genocide has immeasurably enriched the English-language scholarship available to scholars and students of genocide and, in particular, the Holocaust.” —Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions For a full volume listing, please see back matter L t N R et hem ot etuRN Sayfo – The Genocide against the Assyrian, Syriac and Chaldean Christians in the Ottoman Empire Edited by David Gaunt, Naures Atto and Soner O. Barthoma berghahn N E W Y O R K (cid:127) O X F O R D www.berghahnbooks.com Published in 2017 by Berghahn Books www.berghahnbooks.com © 2017 David Gaunt, Naures Atto and Soner O. Barthoma All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. cataloging record is available from the Library of Congress British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-78533-498-6 hardback ISBN 978-1-78533-499-3 ebook C oNteNts R Preface vii Acknowledgements x Introduction: Contextualizing the Sayfo in the First World War 1 David Gaunt, Naures Atto and Soner O. Barthoma Chapter 1 How Armenian was the 1915 Genocide? 33 Ug˘ur Ümit Üngör Chapter 2 Sayfo Genocide: The Culmination of an Anatolian Culture of Violence 54 David Gaunt Chapter 3 The Resistance of Urmia Assyrians to Violence at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century 70 Florence Hellot-Bellier Chapter 4 Mor Dionysios ‘Abd an-Nur Aslan: Church Leader during a Genocide 100 Jan J. van Ginkel Chapter 5 Syriac Orthodox Leadership in the Post-Genocide Period (1918–26) and the Removal of the Patriarchate from Turkey 113 Naures Atto and Soner O. Barthoma Chapter 6 Sayfo, Firman, Qafle: The First World War from the Perspective of Syriac Christians 132 Shabo Talay vi Contents Chapter 7 A Historical Note of October 1915 Written in Dayro D-Zafaran (Deyrulzafaran) 148 Sebastian Brock Chapter 8 Interpretation of the ‘Sayfo’ in Gallo Shabo’s Poem 157 Simon Birol Chapter 9 The Psychological Legacy of the Sayfo: An Inter-generational Transmission of Fear and Distrust 178 Önver A. Cetrez Chapter 10 Sayfo and Denialism: A New Field of Activity for Agents of the Turkish Republic 205 Racho Donef Chapter 11 Turkey’s Key Arguments in Denying the Assyrian Genocide 219 Abdulmesih BarAbraham Chapter 12 Who Killed Whom? A Comparison of Political Discussions in France and Sweden about the Genocide of 1915 233 Christophe Premat Index 255 P RefaCe R T his book appears in a political atmosphere in which great parts of the Middle East have been set alight, where massacres and ethnic and religious cleansing have become part of our daily lives and indigenous minorities that were the target of massacres and ethnic cleansing in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War are again faced with extinction. In their demonstrations worldwide, Assyrians are appeal- ing to the international community to put an end to the ongoing geno- cide; they have been holding placards on which is written ‘1915, 1933, now 2014: No more genocide!’ – referring to the genocidal events in the last century and today. The year 2015 marked the centenary of the genocide during the First World War in Ottoman Turkey. Assyrians refer to this genocide as ‘the year of the sword’ (i Shato du Sayfo1). In a broader context it is more commonly known as the Assyrian genocide, which took place in the borderlands between Turkey, Iran and present-day Iraq and decimated an indigenous population with a unique ethno-religious heritage. Hundreds of thousands were mur- dered or driven into exile with survivors scattered all over the world. Today they are greatly dispersed in a worldwide diaspora, with large populations in the United States, Europe and Australia, and in the Middle East in Iraq and Lebanon, with only tiny remnants of once vibrant communities in Turkey, Syria and Iran. Although it happened a century ago, among the descendants of its victims and survivors the genocide is still a living trauma. The denial of this genocide, the continued oppression of the Assyrians and their recent expulsion from their ancestral homeland have all served to trigger the remembrance of this traumatic past. viii P reface This book is a result of the international research project, ‘An Intergenerational Approach to the Study of Genocide: Seyfo’, organized in the Netherlands by the Inanna Foundation in 2011. The impetus for this book stemmed from a shared conviction among its contributors that there are many issues regarding the Assyrian genocide that have not been dealt with or that still require further investigation. Although the genocide of Ottoman Armenians, Assyrians and Pontic Greeks took place in the same time frame and in the same political context, most of the academic publications that have hitherto appeared discuss only the Armenian genocide. So far, existing literature about the Assyrian geno- cide has been composed principally of a few monographs and articles mainly by historians. Therefore, the primary aim of this volume is to fill the gap in academic research about the Assyrian genocide and develop a greater interest in the Sayfo among scholars. This work is the first aca- demic anthology dealing specifically with the Sayfo. The book aims to provide an interdisciplinary account of the study of the Sayfo by bring- ing together scholars from history, philosophy, anthropology, linguistics, theology, political science and law in order to open up new avenues of research to the study of this less-researched genocide. We believe that the volume will be an important contribution to comparative genocide studies. Naming In this volume, the reader will notice the use of various names for the group(s) discussed in this study. Some of the writers apply the cross- denominational term Assyrian or Syriac to denote what can be seen as an ethnic group originally from Anatolia and Mesopotamia who adhere to several indigenous Christian churches.2 Other authors use a cross- denominational name when referring to the victim group(s) in general terms, as well as their use of the church name when discussing specific experiences. Yet other authors might use only confessional names. In all cases authors have made it clear in their specific chapters how they refer to the group(s) concerned. This multiple naming is the result of a historical condition arising from the millet system of the Ottoman Empire in which the formal status of the Assyrians was that of separate church communities and not an ethno-national group. The national awakening of Assyrians came about in the late Ottoman period but rapidly collapsed as, in the period before and during the First World War, their intellectuals were among the first to be killed. Only after the relocation of large numbers of the Preface ix group to Western countries in the twentieth century did they begin to express a cross-denominational national identity en masse, first as ‘Assyrian’ and later also as ‘Aramean’.3 The name ‘Chaldean’ has also been used to indicate a community when referring to both a religious and an ethnic group. The use of the respective names ‘Assyrians’ and ‘Arameans’ reflects a particular (perceived) ancient ancestry. Many who use the name ‘Arameans’ focus on a more religious identity and stress the importance of their collective identity after their conversion to Christianity. Hence they also use either the name ‘Syriac’ or ‘Aramean’ interchangeably; the latter highlights a more ethno-national identity. In this context, the present-day use of ‘Arameans’ has been developed in opposition to the use and identification as ‘Assyrians’ which has a more political and secular orientation. Despite the heated dispute over what name to use when translating the emic name ‘Suryoye’/‘Suryaye’ into Western languages, all sides suffered from the Sayfo and request recog- nition of it as a genocide from the international community. Notes 1. Sayfo is also spelled Seyfo and Saypa. 2. These churches are the Syriac Orthodox Church, the Church of the East, the Chaldean Catholic Church, the Syriac Catholic Church and their Protestant offshoots. 3. Atto (2011) details the disagreement over self-identity. Cetrez, Donabed and Makko (2013) present the case for Assyrian continuity. For the case of Aramean continuity, see Brock et al. (2001). Bibliography Atto, N. 2011. Hostages in the Homeland. Orphans in the Diaspora. Leiden: Leiden University Press. Brock, Sebastian, et al. 2001. The Hidden Pearl: The Syrian Orthodox Church and its Ancient Aramaic Heritage. Rome: Trans World Film Srl. Cetrez, Ö.A., S.G. Donabed and A. Makko (eds). 2013. The Assyrian Heritage. Threads of Continuity and Influence. Uppsala: Uppsala University Library.
Description: