Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2005: Vol 10 Index

2005·3.6 MB·English

2005 ANNUAL INDEX
Civil Engineering Database Subject Heading Index
The Civil Engineering Database (CEDB) is Artificial intelligence Climatic changes
designed to provide free, easy bibliographic Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water- Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail
access to all ASCE publications. The database shed Runoff and Stream Flows Jy S. Wu, Jun ibility Modeling Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S
covers ASCE documents published since 1970. It Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant: Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85
provides access to all the journals, conference 10(3), 216- 9 (2005). (2005)
proceedings, books, standards, manuals, Application of Generalized Regression Neural Net Climatic data
magazines, and newspapers. The index terms works to Intermittent Flow Forecasting and Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United
below were assigned to papers published in this Estimation Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu; 10(4), States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density
journal during 2005 from a CEDB subject 336-41 (2005). Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano:
heading list. The CEDB and subject heading list Auto-regressive moving-average model 10(4). 327-35 (2005)
can be accessed on the Web at Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/Southern Oscilla- Computation
http://www.pubs.asce.org/cedbsrch.html. tion Index. J. H. Ahn and H. S. Kim; 10 Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions
8-15 (2005) Bruce Hunt and Scott: 10(3). 223-36
Agricultural watersheds Base flow 2005)
Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali Calculation of Groundwater Integral Bruce
bration Accuracy Angelica L. Gutierrez Hunt; 10(6), 516-8 (2005
sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in
Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52 Computer models
Upstate New York. — Jennifer Benaman, Chris-
2005) Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail
tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5),
Bathymetry ability Modeling Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S
363-74 (2005).
Geospatial Representation of River Channels Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; O15 375-85
Air temperature Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment, 2005)
Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation and Ben R. Hodges: 10(3), 243-51 (2005) Conformal mapping
over Kingdom of Thailand. Taichi Tebakari,
Best management practice Steady State Water-Table Depressions Caused by
Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol; Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Evaporation in Lands Overlying a Water
10(3), 205-15 (2005). Water Detention Basins Clay H. Emerson, Bearing Substratum \.R. Kacimov and E.G
Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver 10(3). Youngs: 11 0(4){ , 2J9OS5 -S0W2111 (IONUNS. )
Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling 237-42 (2005) Contamination
Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies. — Purushot Boundary values Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer
tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Steady-State Water-Table Depressions Caused DY tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic
Kenea Gobena: 10(5), 405-19 (2005) Evaporation in Lands Overlying a Water Algorithm ind Musta
Algorithms Bearing Substratum. \.R. Kacimov and E.G Aral; 1O(5)
Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Youngs; 10(4), 295-301 (2005) Dam safety
in Yangtze River. K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and Calibration Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005) Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva
Analytical techniques bration Accuracy Angelica L. Gutierrez dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso;
Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy- Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52 10(1). 50-7 (2005
sis Method Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H. (2005) Data analysis
Xiang; 10(4), 288-94 (2005). Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy
sessment Tool on an / Agricultural Watershed in sis Method Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H
Aquifers
Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele { pstate New York ifer Benaman, Chris Xiang: 10(4). 288-94 (2005)
tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5) Decision making
Shaw Model. Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2),
363-74 (2005). Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood
125-32 (2005). Canada Prediction Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N
Type Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large-
Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Anagnostou; 10(2), 141-50 (2005)
Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers. Mesut
Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling Delaware
Cimen; 10(3), 200-4 (2005).
Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies. — Purushot- Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali-
Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam bration Accuracy. Angelica L. Gutierrez-
Aquifers. — Bruce Hunt; 10(6), 477-84 (2005). Kenea Gobena; 10(5), 405-19 (2005) Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Catchments (2005)
Development Ahmet Dogan and Louis H. Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Detention basins
Motz; 10(6), 492-504 (2005). Hydrograph P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II: K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; Water Detention Basins Clay H. Emerson,
Verification and Application. Ahmet Dogan 10(6). 458-67 (2005) Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3),
and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005). Channel flow 237-42 (2005)
Calculation of Groundwater Integral. Bruce Analyses of Flow Mechanism Based on Master Re- Drainage
Hunt; 10(6), 516-8 (2005). cession Curves. Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(6) Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
Argentina 468-76 (2005) Aquifers Bruce Hunt; 10(6), 477-84 (2005)
Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- China Droughts
cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. - Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele
Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane in Yangtze River. — K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and Shaw Model Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2)
C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005). Y. S. Li: 10(6), 485-91 (2005). 125-32 (2005)
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 / 527
Flow distribution Ground-water flow
Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed Bank-Storage Problem and the Dupuit
Weather Model Data. Nicholas Kouwen, Approximation. Bruce Hunt; 10(2), 118-24
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben (2005).
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis; Type Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large-
Erosion
1001). 23-38 (2005) Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers. — Mesut
Plot Erosior
sis Method Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. Cimen: 10(3), 200-4 (2005).
I: Model Development Thomas E. Croley, II,
Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions.
and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005).
Bruce Hunt and David Scott; 10(3), 223-36
Flow measurement
(2005).
Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
A Dirac-8 Function Notation for Source/Sink
Significant Lateral Inflow. Tommaso Mora-
Terms in Groundwater Flow. Orhan Gunduz
marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and
Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005) and Mustafa M. Aral; 10(5), 420-7 (2005).
Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
Forecasting
Aquifers. Bruce Hunt; 10(6), 477-84 (2005).
Periodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for
Forecasting. M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I:
A. Wasimi; 10(5), 353-62 (2005). Development. Ahmet Dogan and Louis H.
Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Motz; 10(6), 492-504 (2005).
in Yangtze River K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II:
Y. S. Li: 10(6), 485-91 (2005) Verification and Application. — Ahmet Dogan
Fractures and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005).
ng Xiong
Spatial Moment Analysis for Transport of Nonreac- Calculation of Groundwater Integral. — Bruce
-49 2005
tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System. G. Hunt; 10(6), 516-8 (2005).
Finite element method Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar; 10(3), 192-9 History
4 Dirac-8 Function Notation (2005) Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
Terms in Groundwater Flow Frequency analysis Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions.
ind Mustafa M. Aral; 10(5), Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Using
Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.;
Flood control L-Moments for North Brahmaputra Region of 10(6), 450-7 (2005).
Unit Response Approach for India Rakesh Kumar and Chandranath
Hybrid methods
Chatterjee: 10(1), 1-7 (2005).
tion of Flood Source Areas Frequency Analysis of Flood Damage. — L. Zhang Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit
ind Mohammad Khosr<
005 and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 100-9 (2005). Hydrograph. — P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S.
Fuzzy sets K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson;
Flood damage Fuzzy Neural Network Model for Hydrologic Flow 10(6), 458-67 (2005).
Frequency Analysis of Flood Dama
Routing Paresh Deka and V. Chandramouli; Hydraulic conductivity
and Vijay P. Singh: 10(2), 1 10(4), 302-14 (2005).
Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model
Flood frequency Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer- under Infiltration Condition. Sangdan Kim,
Regional Flood Frequency tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2),
L-Moments for North Brahmaputr: Algorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. 151-9 (2005).
India. Rakesh Kumar Aral; 10(5), 386-94 (2005). Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous Soil
Chatterjee: 10(1), 1-7 (2005 Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Fields. — Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kavvas, and
in Yangtze River. — K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and
Flood hydrology ZhiQiang Chen; 10(2), 160-7 (2005).
Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005).
Case Study Watershed Modeling with Distributed Geographic information systems Hydraulic models
Weather Model Data. icholas Kouwen, Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed Geospatial Representation of River Channels. —
LMuaou,r icFer ankD anRa.r dS,e gleAnlileyksso.n and E1 WSouubleisn Slope. \. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary; Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment,
10(2), 133-40 (2005) and Ben R. Hodges; 10(3), 243-51 (2005).
10(1). 23-38 (2005
Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Hydrographs
Factors Affecting Estimates of
Water Detention Basins. — Clay H. Emerson, Comparison of f Kinematic-Wave and Nonlinear
S1l0o(2p)e, 133-4A.0 Ja(s2o0n0 5).H ill anc C2l3a7i-r4e2 W(e2l0t0y5,) . and Robert G. Traver; 10(3), ReserYvioyiirn g RoXuitoinngg oafn dU rbCahna rlWeast erSs.h edM elRcuhnionfgf;.
Flood peaks Geospatial Representation of River Channels.
10(1), 39-49 (2005).
Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina- Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment,
Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
tion of Flood Source Areas Bahram Sagha- and Ben R. Hodges: 10(3), 243-51 (2005).
of Dam Spillway. - C. De Michele, G. Salva-
fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4 ()- Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina-
dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso;
2005 tion of Flood Source Areas. — Bahram Sagha-
10(1), 50-7 (2005).
fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270-7
Flood routing Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
(2005).
Comparison of Kinematic-Wave Nonlinear Significant Lateral Inflow. — Tommaso Mora-
Ground water
Reservoir Routing of Urban Watershed Runoff marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and
Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer-
Yiying Xiong and Charles S. Melching: Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005).
tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic
1061). 39-49 (2005) lgorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali-
Floods Aral: 10(5), 386-94 (2005). bration Accuracy. Angélica L. Gutiérrez-
Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52
Prediction Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N Development. Ahmet Dogan and Louis H. (2005).
Anagnostou; 10(2), 141-50 (2005) Motz: 10(6), 492-504 (2005). Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit
Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II: Hydrograph. — P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S.
in Yangtze River K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and Verification and Application. — Ahmet Dogan K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson;
Y. S. Li: 10(6). 485-91 (2005) and Louis H. Motz: 10(6), 505-15 (2005). 10(6), 458-67 (2005).
528 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005
Hydrologic aspects Based on Nonparametric Random Generation. Kinematic wave theory
Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- Tae-Woong Kim and Juan B. Valdes; 10(5), Comparison of Kinematic-Wave and Nonlinear
cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. 395-404 (2005). Reservoir Routing of Urban Watershed Runoff
Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Yiying Xiong and Charles S. Melching:
C. Boes:; 10(4), 315-26 (2005). Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling 10(1). 39-49 (2005)
Hydrologic data Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies. — Purushot Kinematics
Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Analyses of Flow Mechanism Based on Master Re
over Kingdom of Thailand. Taichi Tebakari, Kenea Gobena; 10(5), 405-19 (2005). cession Curves Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(6),
Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol: Hydrology 468-76 (2005)
10(3), 205-15 (2005). Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models Lakes
Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in Richard H. McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005). Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro
Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions. Bank-Storage Problem and the Dupuit cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns
Approximation Bruce Hunt; 10(2), 118-24 Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane
Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.;
(2005) C. Boes: 10(4). 315 26 (2005)
10(6), 450-7 (2005).
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model Leakage
Hydrologic models I: Model Development Thomas E. Croley, II, Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed and Chansheng He: 10(3), 173-81 (2005) Aquifers Bruce Hunt: 10(6), 477-84 (2005)
Weather Model Data. Nicholas Kouwen, Correlations and Crossing Rates of Periodic Maryland
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben Stochastic Hydrologic Processes Jose _D. Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPI lodel Cali
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis; Salas, Chen-hua Chung, and Antonino bration Accuracy Angelica L. Gutierrez-
10(1), 23-38 (2005) Cancelliere; 10(4), 278-87 (2005). Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5
Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with Application of Generalized Regression Neural Net- (2005)
Significant Lateral Inflow. Tommaso Mora- works to Intermittent Flow Forecasting and Mathematical models
marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and Estimation. Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu; 10(4), A Dirac-6 Function Notation for Source/Sink
Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005). 336-41 (2005). Terms in Groundwater Flow Orhan Gunduz
Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- and Mustafa M. Aral: 10(5), 420-7 (2005
the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in Mathematics
Dakota. Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John Upstate New York. Jennifer Benaman, Chris- Calculation of Groundwater Integral Bruce
Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1), tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5) Hunt: 10(6), 516-8 (2005
70-84 (2005) 363-74 (2005). Matrix methods
Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with India Spatial Moment Analysis for Transporot f Nonreac
Model Combination. — Paulin Coulibaly, Mario Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Using tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System G
Hache, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobee; L-Moments for North Brahmaputra Region of Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar: 10(3),
10(2), 91-9 (2005). India. Rakesh Kumar and Chandranath 2005)
Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele Chatterjee; 10(1), 1-7 (2005). Maximum probable flood
Shaw Model. — Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2), Periodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro-
125-32 (2005). Forecasting M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns
Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model A. Wasimi; 10(5), 353-62 (2005). Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane
C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005
under Infiltration Condition. Sangdan Kim, Infiltration
M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2), Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model Meandering streams
Geospatial Representation of River Channels
151-9 (2005). under Infiltration Condition. Sangdan Kim,
Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment.:
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2),
and Ben R. Hods 10(3), 243-51 (2005)
II: Application. Thomas E. Croley, II, Chan- 151-9 (2005).
sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Measurement
Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Using
(2005). Water Detention Basins. Clay H. Emerson,
L-Moments for North Brahmaputra Region of
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur- Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3),
India Rakesh Kumar and Chandranath
banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water 237-42 (2005).
Chatterjee; 10(1), 1-7 (2005)
and Energy Transfer Process Model. Yang- Inflow
Meteorological data
wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed
Yoshitani; 10(4), 253-63 (2005). Significant Lateral Inflow Tommaso Mora
Knowledge Extraction from Trained Neural Net- marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and Weather Model Data Nicholas Kouwen,
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben
work River Flow Models. — K. P. Sudheer; Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005).
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis:
10(4), 264-9 (2005). Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with 10(1), 23-38 (2005)
Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina- Model Combination. — Paulin Coulibaly, Mario Meteorology
tion of Flood Source Areas. Bahram Sagha- Hache, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobee; Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed
fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270-7 10(2). 91-9 (2005). Weather Model Data Nicholas Kouwen,
(2005). Integrals Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben
Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy- Calculation of Groundwater Integral Bruce | I . Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulits;
sis Method. — Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H. Hunt; 10(6), 516-8 (2005).
Xiang; 10(4), 288-94 (2005). Interpolation Michigan
Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model
cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density II: Application ThomasE . Croley, I, Chan-
Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano; sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91
C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005). 10(4), 327-35 (2005). (2005).
Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali- Italy Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
bration Accuracy. Angelica L. Gutierrez- Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with of Michigan. Christopher M. Trefry, David
Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52 Significant Lateral Inflow. Tommaso Mora- W. Watkins, Jr., and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
(2005). marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and 437-49 (2005).
Synthetic Generation of Hydrologic Time Series Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005). Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 / 529
Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic Probability distribution
ra A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.: Algorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
N6 450-7 (2005) Aral: 10(5), 386-94 (2005). of Dam Spillway. — C. De Michele, G. Salva-
Models Oscillations dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso;
Accuracy Assessment of Peak harge Models Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/Southern Oscilla- 10(1), 50-7 (2005).
Richard H. McCuen; 16-22 (2005 tion Index. — J. H. Ahn and H. S. Kim; 10(1), Pumps
»f Several Flood Forecast ¢ Models 8-15 (2005) Type Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large-
stze Rivet K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, anc Outflows Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers Mesut
Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- Cimen; 10(3), 200-4 (2005).
Y. S. Liz 10(6). 485-91 (2005
cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions.
Moisture uptake
Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane Bruce Hunt and David Scott; 10(3), 223-36
Uptake Model at Hetet
C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005). (2005).
Sangdan Kim, M. Levert
Overland fiow Rainfall
Roll Waves in Overland Flow. OO: br kb, Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation
Chen, J. C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 110-7 over Kingdom of Thailand. — Taichi Tebakari,
2005). Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol;
\nalyses of Flow Mechanism Based on Master Re- 10(3), 205-15 (2005).
cession Curves Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(6), Rainfall duration
468-76 (2005) Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
Parameters of Michigan. Christopher M. Trefry, David
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. W. Watkins, Jr, and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
1: Model Development. — Thomas E. Croley, II, 37-49 (2005).
and Chansheng He: 10(3), 173-81 (2005). Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions.
Il: Application Thomas E. Croley, If, Chan- Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.:
sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 10(6), 450-7 (2005).
2005) Rainfall frequency
Peak flow Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models of Michigan. — Christopher M. Trefry, David
Richard H. McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005) W. Watkins, Jr, and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
Pennsylvania 437-49 (2005).
Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
Water Detention Basins Clay H. Emerson, Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions.
Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3), Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.:
237-42 (2005). 10(6), 450-7 (2005).
Performance evaluation Rainfall intensity
Evaluation of Neural Network Streamflow Fore- Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United
casting on 47 Watersheds Francois Anctil States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density.
1 Alexandre Rat; 10(1), 85-8 (2005). Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano;
\. Shoemaker Porusiiy 10(4), 327-35 (2005).
4 (2005 Spatial Moment Analysis for Transport of Nonreac- Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
Nonlinear analysis tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System. G. of Michigan. Christopher M. Trefry, David
Nonlinear Model uresh Kumar and M. Sekhar: 10(3), 192-9 W. Watkins, Jr., and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
2005) 437-49 (2005).
8-15 (2005 Potholes Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
| of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions.
Nonlinear response
the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North - Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.;
Unit Response Approach f
Dakota Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John 10(6), 450-7 (2005).
of Flood Source é
Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1), Rainfall-runoff relationship
fian and Mohammad Khx
2005 0-84 (2005 Evaluation of Neural Network Streamflow Fore-
Precipitation casting on 47 Watersheds. Francois Anctil
North Dakota Synthetic Generation of Hydrologic Time Series and Alexandre Rat; 10(1), 85-8 (2005).
Simulation of a Semiper
Based on Nonparametric Random Generation. Comparison of Kinematic-Wave and Nonlinear
ttonwood Lake Tae-Woong Kim and Juan B. Valdes; 10(5), Reservoir Routing of Urban Watershed Runoff.
Rosemary Ca
395-404 (2005) Yiying Xiong and Charles S. Melching;
Tom Winter, and
Predictions 10(1), 39-49 (2005)
2005
Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Random variables
Numerical models Prediction Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N. Synthetic Generation of Hydrologic Time Series
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Gro Anagnostou; 10(2), 141-50 (2005). Based on Nonparametric Random Generation.
Development Ahmet Doga Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- Tae-Woong Kim and Juan B. Valdés; 10(5),
Motz: 10(6). 492-504 (2005 cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. 395-404 (2005).
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwate Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane Rangeland
Verification and Applicatior C. Boes: 10(4), 315-26 (2005). Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in
Motz; 10(6 Probabilistic methods the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North
Optimization Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Dakota Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John
Effect of Flow Proporti ms on Model Prediction Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N. Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1),
bration Accuracy Angelica L. Gutiert Anagnostou; 10(2). 141-50 (2005). 70-84 (2005).
Magannde Rischasrd H. McCuen; 10(5), 34 Probability Regression
2005 Frequency Analysis of Flood Damage. — L. Zhang Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models.
Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer- and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 100-9 (2005). — Richard H. McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005).
530 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005
Remedial action shed Runoff and Stream Flows. — Jy S. Wu, Jun Soil water
Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer- Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant: Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous Soil
tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic 10(3), 216-22 (2005). Fields Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kavvas, and
Algorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. Runoff forecasting ZhiQiang Chen; 10(2), 160-7 (2005)
Aral; 10(5), 386-94 (2005). Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with Solar radiation
Reservoir systems Model Combination. — Paulin Coulibaly, Mario Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation
Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail- Haché, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobée; over Kingdom of Thailand Taichi Tebakari,
ability Modeling. — Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S 10(2), 91-9 (2005) Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol;
Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85 Saturated soils 10(3). 205-15 (2005
(2005). Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Spatial analysis
Reservoirs Development Ahmet Dogan and Louis H Spatial Moment Analysis for Transporto f Nonreac
Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with Motz: 10(6), 492-504 (2005) tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System
Model Combination. — Paulin Coulibaly, Mario Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar: 10(3),
Haché, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobée; Verification and Application Ahmet Dogan (2005).
10(2), 91-9 (2005). and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005) Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina
Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Seasonal variations tion of Flood Source Areas Bahram Sagha
Hydrograph. — P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S. Periodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270-7
K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; Forecasting. M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh 2005)
10(6), 458-67 (2005). A. Wasimi; 10(5), 353-62 (2005) Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United
States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density
Response time Sediment transport
Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano;
10(4), 327-35 (2005)
Slope. — A. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary; sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in
10(2), 133-40 (2005). Upstate New York. Jennifer Benaman, Chris Spatial distribution
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model
Risk analysis tine A. Shoemakera,n d Douglas A. Haith; 10(5),
I: Model Development rhomasE . Croley, II,
Frequency Analysis of Flood Damage. — L. Zhang 363-74 (2005).
and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005
and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 100-9 (2005). Sediment yield
Spillways
River basins Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As
Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Ad \
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in
of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva
I]: Application. — Thomas E. Croley, I, Chan- Upstate New York Jennifer Benaman, Chris- dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R
sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5),
363-74 (2005) 1001). 50-7 (2005
(2005). Statistics
Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail- Seepage
Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models
ability Modeling. — Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S. Steady-State Water-Table Depressions Caused by
Richard H. McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005)
Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85 Evaporation in Lands Overlying a Water-
Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
(2005). Bearing Substratum. A.R. Kacimov and E.G
River flow Youngs; 10(4), 295-301 (2005) odfo riD, amM . SpCIt ialnlowsasyi , A. C. PetDaec ciMai, chealned, RG.. RSoaslsvoa
Bank-Storage Problem and the Dupuit Shear flow 10(1). 50-7 (2005)
Approximation Bruce Hunt; 10(2), 118-24 Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy Stochastic models
(2005). sis Method Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/Southern Oscilla
Knowledge Extraction from Trained Neural Net- Xiang; 10(4), 288-94 (2005) tion Index J. H. Ahr
work River Flow Models K. P. Sudheer; Simulation models 8-15 (2005)
10(4), 264-9 (2005). Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous Soil
Fuzzy Neural Network Model for Hydrologic Flow sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in Fields Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kav
Routing. — Paresh Deka and V. Chandramouli; Upstate New York. — Jennifer Benaman, Chris
ZhiQiang Chen; 10(2), 160-7 (2005
10(4), 302-14 (2005). tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5) Stochastic processes
Application of Generalized Regression Neural Net- 363-74 (2005) Correlations and Crossing Rates
works to Intermittent Flow Forecasting and Slopes Stochastic Hydrologic Processe
Estimation. — Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu; 10(4), Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele
Salas Chen-hua Chun
336-41 (2005). Shaw Model Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2), Cancelliere; 10(4), 278
P eriodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for 125-32 (2005) Storm runoff
Forecasting. — M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United
A. Wasimi; 10(5), 353-62 (2005). Slope. A. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary; States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density
Rivers 10(2), 133-40 (2005) Robert J. Allen and rT. DeGaetano;
Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Snow depth 10(4), 327-35 (2005)
in Yangtze River. — K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near Stormwater management
Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005). Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm
Routing Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies Purushot- Water Detention Basins Clay H. Emerson,
Fuzzy Neural Network Model for Hydrologic Flow tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3),
Routing. — Paresh Deka and V. Chandramouli; Kenea Gobena; 10(5), 405-19 (2005). 237-42 (2005).
10(4), 302-14 (2005). Snowmelt Stream channels
Runoff Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Geospatial Representation of River Channels
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment,
I: Model Development. — Thomas E. Croley, II, Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies. — Purushot- and Ben R. Hodges; 10(3), 243-51 (2005).
and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005). tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Streamflow
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. Kenea Gobena; 10(5), 405-19 (2005). Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
Ii: Application. — Thomas E. Croley, II, Chan- Soil erosion Significant Lateral Inflow Tommaso Mora-
sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 Roll Waves in Overland Flow. Q. Q. Liu, | marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and
(2005). Chen, J. C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 110-7 Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005).
Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water- (2005). Correlations and Crossing Rates of Periodic-
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 / 531
United States Water supply
Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As-
aOSOS States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density. sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in
HSPF Mode Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano; Upstate New York. Jennifer Benaman, Chris-
10(4), 327-35 (2005) tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5),
Unsaturated flow 363-74 (2005).
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail-
Development Ahmet Dogan and Louis H. ability Modeling. - Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S.
Motz: 10(6), 492-504 (2005). Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II: (2005).
Streamfiow forecasting Verification and Application. Ahmet Dogan Water table
I Neural Network and Louis H. Motz: 10(6), 505-15 (2005) Steady-State Water-Table Depressions Caused by
Unsteady flow Evaporation in Lands Overlying a Water-
Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model Bearing Substratum. A.R. Kacimov and E.G
under Infiltration Condition Sangdan Kim, Youngs; 10(4), 295-301 (2005).
M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2), Calculation of Groundwater Integral. Bruce
151-9 (2005) Hunt: 10(6), 516-8 (2005).
[ype Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large-
Water treatment
Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers. Mesut
Cimen; 10(3), 200-4 (2005). A Dirac-8 Function Notation for Source/Sink
Terms in Groundwater Flow. — Orhan Gunduz
Urban development
and Mustafa M. Aral: 10(5), 420-7 (2005)
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur-
banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water Watershed management
and Energy Transfer Process Model Yang- Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm
wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi Water Detention Basins. Clay H. Emerson,
Yoshitani: 10(4), 253-63 (2005). Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3),
Urban runoff 237-42 (2005).
Comparison of Kinematic-Wave and Nonlinear Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina-
Reservoir Routing of Urban Watershed Runoff. tion of Flood Source Areas. Bahram Sagha-
Yiying Xiong and Charles S. Melching; fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270-7
10(1), 39-49 (2005) (2005).
Vadose zone Watersheds
Texas
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Evaluation of Neural Network Streamflow Fore-
Incc
Development Ahmet Dogan and Louis H. casting on 47 Watersheds. Francois Anctil
Mots Motz: 10(6), 492-504 (2005) and Alexandre Rat: 10(1), 85-8 (2005).
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II: Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed
O05
Verification and Application. Ahmet Dogan Slope. A. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary;
Thailand and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005) 10(2), 133-40 (2005).
Validation Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model.
Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models. I: Model Development. — Thomas E. Croley, II,
Richard H McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005). and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005).
Velocity Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water-
rhree-dimensional models Bank-Storage Problem and _ the Dupuit shed Runoff and Stream Flows. Jy S. Wu, Jun
ted 3D Grou Approximation Bruce Hunt: 10(2), 118-24 Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant;
and Applicat 2005). 10(3), 216-22 (2005).
uis H. Motz: 10(6 Spatial Moment Analysis for Transport of Nonreac- Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur-
Time series analysis tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System G banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water
Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/So Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar; 10(3), 192-9 and Energy Transfer Process Model. Yang-
(2005) wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi
Water balance Yoshitani; 10(4), 253-63 (2005).
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur-
Waves
banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water
Roll Waves in Overland Flow. ©. ©. Liu, L.
and Energy Transfer Process Model Yang-
Chen, J.C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 110-7
wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi
(2005)
Yoshitani; 10(4), 253-63 (2005).
ic Hydrologic Processes Water fiow Wells
Chen-hua Chung Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele Type Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large-
Cancelliere: 10(4), Shaw Model Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2), Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers Mesut
Synthetic Generation « 125-32 (2005) Cimen; 10(3), 200-4 (2005).
Based on Nonpa Water storage Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions.
Tae-Woon; Bank-Storage Problem and __ the Dupuit Bruce Hunt and David Scott; 10(3), 223-36
395-404 (2005) Approximation Bruce Hunt; 10(2), 118-24 (2005).
Uncertainty analysis (2005). Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
Assessment of a Probabilistic Scher ne for Flood Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions. Aquifers. — Bruce Hunt; 10(6), 477-84 (2005).
Prediction Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N Bruce Hunt and David Scott; 10(3), 223-36 Wetlands
Anagnostou: 10(2). 141-50 (2005) (2005). Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in
iltiple Uncer- Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North
Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetitcic Hydrograph. P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S. Dakota. — Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John
\lgorithm Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1),
Aral: 10(5), 386-94 (2005) 10(6), 458-67 (2005). 70-84 (2005).
532 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005
2005 ANNUAL INDEX
Author Index
Ahn, J. H. Hydrographb”y P. K. Bhunya,S . K. Mishra, and Chandramouli, V.
Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/Southern Oscilla- Ronny Berndtsson P. K. Bhunya, S. K Fuzzy Neural Network Model fo
tion Index J. H. Ahn and H. S. Kim; 10(1), Mishra, and Ronny Berndtsson; 10(6), 521-2 Routing Paresh [ ka a
8-15 (2005). (2005) 11 0(4). 3202-114) 9_1(4 2005Ns
Allen, Robert J. Bhunya, P. K. Chatterjee, Chandranath
Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Regional Flood I requency
States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density. Hydrograph. P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S. L-Moments for North Brahn
Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano; K. Mishra,C . S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; India Rakesh Kun
10(4), 327-35 (2005). 10(6), 458-67 (2005) Chatterjee; 10(1), 1-7 (2005
Anagnostou, Emmanouil N. Closure to “Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma Chau, K. W.
Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models
Prediction. — Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N. Hydrographb”y P.K . Bhunya,S . K. Mishra, and in Yangtze River K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu
Anagnostou; 10(2), 141-50 (2005) Ronny Berndtsson. P. K. Bhunya, S. K Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005
Mishra, and Ronny Berndtsson; 10(6), 521-2
Anctil, Francois Chen, L.
2005)
Evaluation of Neural Network Streamflow Fore- Roll Waves in Overland Flow Q. Q. Liu, |
casting on 47 Watersheds. Francois Anctil Bingeman, Allyson Chen,J . C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2 ()
and Alexandre Rat; 10(1), 85-8 (T) (2005). Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed 2005)
Weather Model Data Nicholas Kouwen,
Annambhotla, Shastri Chen, ZhiQiang
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben
Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water- Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous So
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis:
shed Runoff and Stream Flows. — Jy S. Wu, Jun Fields Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kavvas, a
10(1), 23-38 (2005).
Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant; ZhiQianlga nt Chene;n 10(2). 160-7 (2005
10(3), 216-22 (2005) Bobée, Bernard Chung, Chen-hua
Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with
Aral, Mustafa M. Correlations and Crossing Rates of Periodi
Model Combination Paulin Coulibaly, Mario
Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer- Stochastic Hydrologic Processes Jose D
Hache, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobee:
tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic Salas Chen-hua Chung and Antonino
10(2). 91-9 (2005)
Algorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. Cancelliere; 10(4), 278-87 (2005
Aral; 10(5), 386-94 (2005). Boes, Duane C. Cigizoglu, Hikmet Kerem
A Dirac-6 Function Notation for Source/Sink Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro Application of Generalized Regression Neural Net
Terms in Groundwater Flow. Orhan Gunduz cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns works to Intermittent Flow Forecasting and
and Mustafa M. Aral; 10(5), 420-7 (2005). Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane Estimation Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu; 10(4)
C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005). 2c AI JOYS
Barbetta, Silvia 336-41 (T) (2005)
Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with Brazenec, W. A. Cimen, Mesut
Significant Lateral Inflow. Tommaso Mora- Discussion of “Simple Snowdrift Model for Dis Type Curves for Unsteady Flow to a Large
marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and tributed Hydrological Modeling” by M. Todd Diameter Well in Patchy Aquifers Mesut
Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005). Walter, Donald K. McCool, Larry G. King, Cimen; 10(3), 200-4 (2005
Myron Molnau, and Gaylon S. Campbell S
Barry, D. A. Coulibaly, Paulin
R. Fassnacht and W. A. Brazenec; 10(6), 522-4
Discussion of ‘Modeling Groundwater Flow under Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Fi recasts W tihn
(2005)
Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E Model Combination Paulin Coulibaly, Mario
Serrano D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li, Bryant, Scott Hache, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobee
D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington; 10(2), 91-9 (2005)
10(5), 428-9 (2005). shed Runoff and Stream Flows Jy S. Wu, Jun Croley, Thomas E., II
Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant; Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Modedel
to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio E. 10(3), 216-22 (2005) I: Model Development ThomasE . Croley, I,
Serrano. — D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li, Cancelliere, Antonino and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005)
D.-S. Jeng, and D. A. Lockington; 10(5), 433-4 Correlations and Crossing Rates of Periodic- Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model
(2005). Stochastic Hydrologic Processes. Jose D Il: Application Thomas E. Croley, I, Chan
Benaman, Jennifer Salas, Chen-hua Chung, and Antonino sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91
Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- Cancelliere: 10(4), 278-87 (2005) (2005)
sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in Canossi, M. Danard, Maurice
Upstate New York. — Jennifer Benaman, Chris- Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed
tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5), of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva Weather Model Data Nicholas Kouwen,
363-74 (2005). dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso; Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben
Berndtsson, Ronny 10(1), 50-7 (2005) Luo, Frank R.> Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis
Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Carroll, Rosemary 10(1). 23-38 (2005)
Hydrograph. - P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S. Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in DeGaetano, Arthur T.
K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North Areal Reduction Factors for Two Eastern United
10(6), 458-67 (2005). Dakota. — Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John States Regions with High Rain-Gauge Density
Closure to “Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1), Robert J. Allen and Arthur T. DeGaetano;
Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit 70-84 (2005). 10(4), 327-35 (2005).
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 / 533
Deka, Paresh Guan, Jiabao Serrano. — D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li,
Fuzzy Neural Network Model for Hydrologic Flow Remediation System Design with Multiple Uncer- D.-S. Jeng, and D. A. Lockington; 10(5), 433-4
R2o utinrsy y Paresh Deka and V. Chandramouli; tain Parameters Using Fuzzy Sets and Genetic (2005).
10(4). 302-14 (2005) Algorithm. Jiabao Guan and Mustafa M. Jia, Yangwen
De Michele, C. Aral; 10(5), 386-94 (2005). Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur-
Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy Gunduz, Orhan banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water
of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva- A Dirac-5 Function Notation for Source/Sink and Energy Transfer Process Model. — Yang-
lori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso; Terms in Groundwater Flow. — Orhan Gunduz wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi
10(1). 50-7 (2005) and Mustafa M. Aral; 10(5), 420-7 (2005) Yoshitani; 10(4), 253-63 (2005).
Dogan, Ahmet Gutiérrez-Magness, Angélica L.
Johnson, Dennis
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I: Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali-
Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
Development Ahmet Dogan and Louis H bration Accuracy. Angelica L. Gutierrez-
of Michigan. — Christopher M. Trefry, David
Motz: 10(6). 492-504 (2005 Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52
W. Watkins, Jr., and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II (2005).
437-49 (2005).
Verification and Application Ahmet Dogan Hache, Mario
and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005) Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with Kacimoy, A. R.
Emerson, Clay H. Model Combination. — Paulin Coulibaly, Mario Steady-State Water-Table Depressions Caused by
Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm Haché, Vincent Fortin, and Bernard Bobée; Evaporation in Lands Overlying a Water-
Water Detention Basins Clay H. Emerson, 10(2), 91-9 (2005). Bearing Substratum. — A. R. Kacimov and E. G.
Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3), Haith, Douglas A. Youngs; 10(4), 295-361 (2005).
237-42 (2005 Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- Kavvas, M. Levent
Fassnacht, S. R. sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model
Discussion of > Snowdrift Model for Upstate New York. — Jennifer Benaman, Chris- under Infiltration Condition. — Sangdan Kim,
tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5), M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2),
Walter, Donald K. McCool, Larry 363-74 (2005). 151-9 (2005).
Myron Molnau, and Gaylon S. Campbell Han, Jun Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous Soil
R. Fassnacht and W. A. Brazenec: 10(6 Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water- Fields. — Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kavvas, and
2005 shed Runoff and Stream Flows. — Jy S. Wu, Jun ZhiQiang Chen; 10(2), 160-7 (2005).
Felden, Fabrice Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant;
Khosroshahi, Mohammad
Incorporation of Climate Change in Water 10(3), 216-22 (2005).
Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina-
ability Modeling Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranj< He, Chansheng tion of Flood Source Areas. — Bahram Sagha-
Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5) Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270-7
2005 I: Model Development. — Thomas E. Croley, II,
(2005).
Fortin, Vincent and Chansheng He; 10(3), 173-81 (2005).
Improving Daily Reservoir Inflow Forecasts with Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model. Kim, H. S.
Model Combination Paulin Coulibaly, Mario I]: Application Thomas E. Croley, II, Chan- Nonlinear Modeling of El Nino/Southern Oscilla-
Hache, Vincent Fortin, sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 tion Index. — J. H. Ahn and H. S. Kim; 10(1),
10(2). 91-9 (2005) (2005) 8-15 (2005).
Gan, Thian Yew " Hill, A. Jason Kim, Sangdan
Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed Upscaling of Vertical Unsaturated Flow Model
Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling Slope. — A. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary; under Infiltration Condition. Sangdan Kim,
Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies Purushot- 10(2), 133-40 (2005). M. Levent Kavvas, and Jaeyoung Yoon; 10(2),
tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Hodges, Ben R. 151-9 (2005)
Kenea Gobena: 10(5), 405-19 (2005) Geospatial Representation of River Channels. Root-Water Uptake Model at Heterogeneous Soil
Geérard-Marchant, Pierre Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment, Fields. — Sangdan Kim, M. Levent Kavvas, and
Closure to “Simple Estimation of Prevalence of and Ben R. Hodges; 10(3), 243-51 (2005). ZhiQiang Chen; 10(2), 160-7 (2005).
Hortonian Flow in New York City Watersheds” Hossain, Faisal Kim, Tae-Woong
by M. Todd Walter, Vishal K. Mehta, Alexis M Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Synthetic Generation of Hydrologic Time Series
Marrone, Jan Boll, Pierre Gerard-Marchant, Prediction. — Faisal Hossain and Emmanouil N. Based on Nonparametric Random Generation.
Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael! F. Walter Anagnostou; 10(2), 141-50 (2005). — Tae-Woong Kim and Juan B. Valdés; 10(5),
M. Todd Walter, Pierre Gerard-Marchant, Hunt, Bruce 395-404 (2005).
Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter: Bank-Storage Problem and _ the Dupuit
Kinouchi, Tsuyoshi
10(2). 169-70 (2005) Approximation. — Bruce Hunt; 10(2), 118-24 Distributed Hydrologic Modeling in a Partially Ur-
Gerold, Laura A. (2005). banized Agricultural Watershed Using Water
Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions. —
and Energy Transfer Process Model. — Yang-
Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions. Bruce Hunt and David Scott; 10(3), 223-36
wen Jia, Tsuyoshi Kinouchi, and Junichi
Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.; (2005). Yoshitani; 10(4), 253-63 (2005).
1016), 450-7 (2005) Flow to Vertical and Nonvertical Wells in Leaky
Ghosh, N. C. Aquifers. — Bruce Hunt; 10(6), 477-84 (2005). Kouwen, Nicholas
Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Calculation of Groundwater Integral. — Bruce Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed
Hydrograph. — P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S. Hunt; 10(6), 516-8 (T) (2005). Weather Model Data. Nicholas Kouwen,
K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson; Jeng, D.-S. Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben
10(6), 458-67 (2005) Discussion of ““Modeling Groundwater Flow under Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis;
10(1), 23-38 (2005).
Gobena, Adam Kenea Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E.
Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Serrano. — D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li, Kumar, G. Suresh
Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington; Spatial Moment Analysis for Transport of Nonreac-
Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies Purushot- 10(5), 428-9 (2005). tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System. G.
tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar; 10(3), 192-9
Kenea Gobena; 10(5), 405-19 (2005). to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio E. (2005).
534 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005
Kumar, Rakesh McCuen, Richard H. Motz, Louis H.
Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Using Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models. Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. I:
L-Moments for North Brahmaputra Region of Richard H. McCuen; 10(1), 16-22 (2005). Development. — Ahmet Dogan and Louis H
India. Rakesh Kumar and Chandranath Effect of Flow Proportions on HSPF Model Cali- Motz; 10(6), 492-504 (2005)
Chatterjee; 10(1), 1-7 (2005). bration Accuracy Angélica L. Gutiérrez- Saturated-Unsaturated 3D Groundwater Model. II:
Magness and Richard H. McCuen; 10(5), 343-52 Verification and Application hmet Dogan
Lee, Deborah H.
(2005). and Louis H. Motz; 10(6), 505-15 (2005)
Distributed-Parameter Large Basin Runoff Model.
Il: Application Thomas E. Croley, I, Chan- McDonnell, Jeff Muttiah, Ranjan S.
sheng He, and Deborah H. Lee; 10(3), 182-91 Discussion of “Simple Estimation of Prevalence of Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail-
(2005). Hortonian Flow in New York City Watersheds” ability Modeling Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S.
by M. Todd Walter, Vishal K. Mehta, Alexis M. Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85
Li, J. C. Marrone, Jan Boll, Pierre Gerard-Marchant, (2005).
Roll Waves in Overland Flow. OO Lite EL: Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter.
Chen, J. C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 110-7 Jeff McDonnell; 10(2), 168-9 (2005) Neary, Vincent S.
Factors Affecting Estimates of Average Watershed
(2005). Melching, Charles S.
Slope. A. Jason Hill and Vincent S. Neary;
Li, L. Comparison of Kinematic-Wave and Nonlinear 10(2), 133-40 (2005)
Discussion of ‘Modeling Groundwater Flow under Reservoir Routing of Urban Watershed Runoff
Yiying Xiong and Charles S. Melching; Ojha, C. S. P.
Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E.
10(1). 39-49 (2005). Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit
Serrano. D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li,
D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington; Melone, Florisa Hy\ droggrraafp h P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S
K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson;
10(5), 428-9 (2005). Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
10(6), 458-67 (2005)
Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution Significant Lateral Inflow. Tommaso Mora-
to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio E. marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and Parlange, J.-Y.
Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005) Discussion of “Modeling Groundwater Flow under
Serrano. D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li,
D.-S. Jeng, and D. A. Lockington; 10(5), 433-4 Merwade, Venkatesh M. Iransient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio I
(2005). Geospatial Representation of River Channels. Serrano D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li,
Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment, D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington;
Li, Y. S. and Ben R. Hodges; 10(3), 243-51 (2005) 10(5), 428-9 (2005)
Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution
Michel, Claude
in Yangtze River. K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio |
Discussion of “Sampling Adjustment Factors for 1
Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005). Serrano. D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange,L . Li,
Rainfall Recorded at Fixed Time Intervals” by
D.-S. Jeng, and D. A. Lockington; 10(5), 433-4
Liu, Q. Q. C. Bryan Young and Bruce M. McEnroe. (2005)
Roll Waves in Overland Flow. Q. Q. Liu, L. Claude Michel; 10(1), 89-90 (2005)
Chen, J. C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh; 10(2), 110-7 Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution Petaccia, A.
(2005). to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio I Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy- Serrano. — Claude Michel; 10(5), 434-5 (2005) of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva
sis Method. Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H. Discussion of “Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso;
Xiang; 10(4), 288-94 (2005). Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit 10(1). 50-7 (2005)
Hydrograph” by P. K. Bhunya,S . K. Mishra, and Pohll, Greg
Lockington, D. A. Ronny Berndtsson. Claude Michel; 10(6), Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in
Discussion of “Modeling Groundwater Flow under 519-20 (2005)
the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North
Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E
Mishra, S. K. Dakota Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John
Serrano. D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li,
Hybrid Model for Derivation of Synthetic Unit Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1)
D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington;
Hydrograph P. K. Bhunya, N. C. Ghosh, S 70-84 (2005)
10(5), 428-9 (2005). K. Mishra, C. S. P. Ojha, and Ronny Berndtsson
Discussion of “Improved Decomposition Solution 10(6), 458-67 (2005) Rat, Alexandre
to Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio E Closure to “Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma Evaluation of Neural Network Streamflow Fore
Serrano. D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li, Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit casting on 47 Watersheds. Francois Anctil
D.-S. Jeng, and D. A. Lockington; 10(5), 433-4 Hydrograph” by P. K. Bhunya, S. K. Mishra, and ind Alexandre Rat; 10(1), 85-8 (T) (2005)
(2005). Ronny Berndtsson P. K. Bhunya, S. K Rosso, R.
Mishra, and Ronny Berndtsson; 10(6), 521-2 Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy
Luo, Wuben
Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed (2005) of Dam Spillway C. De Michele, G. Salva
Weather Model Data Nicholas Kouwen, Mizumura, Kazumasa dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso;
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben Recession Analysis of Drought Flow Using Hele 10(1). 50-7 (2005)
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis Shaw Model Kazumasa Mizumura; 10(2), Saghafian, Bahram
10(1), 23-38 (2005) 5-32 (2005) Unit Response Approach for Priority Determina
Analyses of Flow Mechanism Based on Master Re- tion of Flood Source Areas Bahram Sagha-
Maidment, David R. cession Curvese Kazumasa Mizumura; |0(6), fian and Mohammad Khosroshahi; 10(4), 270
Geospatial Representation of River Channels 468-76 (2005) (2005)
Venkatesh M. Merwade, David R. Maidment,
| Mondal, M. Shahjahan Salas, Jose D.
and Ben R. Hodges; 10(3), 243-51 (2005)
Periodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for Correlations and Crossing Rates of Periodic-
McCool, Donald K. Forecasting M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh Stochastic Hydrologic Processes. Jose D
Closure to “Simple Snowdrift Model for Distrib- A. Wasimi: 10(5), 353-62 (2005) Salas, Chen-hua Chung, and Antonino
uted Hydrological Modeling” by M. Todd Moramarco, Tommaso Cancelliere; 10(4), 278-87 (2005).
Walter, Donald K. McCool, Larry G. King, Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro-
Myron Molnau, and Gaylon S. Campbell M Significant Lateral Inflow Tommaso Mora- cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns
Todd Walter and Donald K. McCool; 10(6) marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane
524-5 (2005) Vijay P. Singh: 10(1), 58-69 (2005) C. Boes; 10(4), 315-26 (2005).
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 / 535
Salvadori, G. Soulis, Eric D. Walter, M. Todd
Bivariate Statistical Approach to Check Adequacy Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed Closure to “Simple Estimation of Prevalence of
of Dam Spillway. — C. De Michele, G. Salva- Weather Model Data. - Nicholas Kouwen, Hortonian Flow in New York City Watersheds”
dori, M. Canossi, A. Petaccia, and R. Rosso; Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben by M. Todd Walter, Vishal K. Mehta, Alexis M.
10(1). 50-7 (2005). Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis; Marrone, Jan Boll, Pierre Gérard-Marchant,
Scott, David 10(1), 23-38 (2005). Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter. —
M. Todd Walter, Pierre Gérard-Marc’:>ot,
Extension of Hantush and Boulton Solutions
Bruce Hunt and David Scott: 10(3), 223-36 Stagnitti, F. Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter;
(2005). Discussion of “Modeling Groundwater Flow under 10(2), 169-70 (2005).
Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E. Closure to “Simple Snowdrift Model for Distrib-
Seglenieks, Frank R.
Serrano D. A. Barry, J.-Y. Parlange, L. Li, uted Hydrological Modeling” by M. Todd
Case Study: Watershed Modeling with Distributed
D.-S. Jeng, F. Stagnitti, and D. A. Lockington; Walter, Donald K. McCool, Larry G. King,
Weather Model Data. Nicholas Kouwen,
Maurice Danard, Allyson Bingeman, Wuben 10(5), 428-9 (2005). Myron Molnau, and Gaylon S. Campbell. — M.
Todd Walter and Donald K. McCool; 10(6),
Luo, Frank R. Seglenieks, and Eric D. Soulis; Steenhuis, Tammo S. 524-5 (2005)
10(1). 23-38 (2005) Closure to “Simple Estimation of Prevalence of
Walter, Michael F.
Sekhar, M. Hortonian Flow in New York City Watersheds”
Closure to “Simple Estimation of Prevalence of
Spatial Moment Analysis for Transport of Nonreac- by M. Todd Walter, Vishal K. Mehta, Alexis M.
Hortonian Flow in New York City Watersheds”
tive Solutes in Fracture-Matrix System G. Marrone, Jan Boll, Pierre Gérard-Marchant, by M. Todd Walter, Vishal K. Mehta, Alexis M.
Suresh Kumar and M. Sekhar; 10(3), 192-9
Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter. — Marrone, Jan Boll, Pierre Gérard-Marchant,
(2005).
M. Todd Walter, Pierre Gerard-Marchant, Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter. —
Serrano, Sergio E. Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter; M. Todd Walter, Pierre Gérard-Marchant,
Closure to “Modeling Groundwater Flow under 10(2), 169-70 (2005). Tammo S. Steenhuis, and Michael F. Walter:
Transient Nonlinear Free Surface,” by Sergio E.
Serrano Sergio E. Serrano; 10(5), 429-33 Sudheer, K. P. 10(2), 169-70 (2005).
(2005) Knowledge Extraction from Trained Neural Net- Wasimi, Saleh A.
Closure to “Improved Decomposition Solution to work River Flow Models. — K. P. Sudheer; Periodic Transfer Function-Noise Model for
Green and Ampt Equation” by Sergio E. 10(4), 264-9 (2005). Forecasting. — M. Shahjahan Mondal and Saleh
Serrano Sergio E. Serrano; 10(5), 41325< -6 A. Wasimi; 10(5), 353-62 (2005).
Suvanpimol, Chanchai
(2005) Watkins, David W., Jr.
Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation
Shoemaker, Christine A. Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
over Kingdom of Thailand. — Taichi Tebakari,
Calibration and Validation of Soil and Water As- of Michigan. — Christopher M. Trefry, David
Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol;
sessment Tool on an Agricultural Watershed in W. Watkins, Jr., and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
Upstate New York. — Jennifer Benaman, Chris- 10(3), 205-15 (2005). 437-49 (2005).
tine A. Shoemaker, and Douglas A. Haith; 10(5), Sveinsson, Oli G. B. Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Analysis in
363-74 (2005). Prediction of Extreme Events in Hydrologic Pro- Michigan Using Scale-Invariance Assumptions.
Singh, Purushottam Raj cesses that Exhibit Abrupt Shifting Patterns. — — Laura A. Gerold and David W. Watkins, Jr.;
Modified Temperature Index Method Using Near- Oli G. B. Sveinsson, Jose D. Salas, and Duane 10(6), 450-7 (2005).
Surface Soil and Air Temperatures for Modeling C. Boes: 10(4), 315-26 (2005). Welty, Claire
Snowmelt in the Canadian Prairies. — Purushot- Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm
Tebakari, Taichi
tam Raj Singh, Thian Yew Gan, and Adam Water Detention Basins. — Clay H. Emerson,
Kenea Gobena: 10(5), 405-19 (2005) Time-Space Trend Analysis in Pan Evaporation Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver: 10(3),
Singh, Sushil K. over Kingdom of Thailand. — Taichi Tebakari, 237-42 (2005)
Junichi Yoshitani, and Chanchai Suvanpimol;
Discussion of “Simplified Two-Parameter Gamma Winter, Tom
Distribution for Derivation of Synthetic Unit 10(3), 205-15 (2005). Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in
Hydrograph” by P. K. Bhunya, S. K. Mishra, and Tracy, John the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North
Ronny Berndtsson. Sushil K. Singh; 10(6), Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in Dakota. — Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John
520-1 (2005). the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1),
Singh, V. P. Dakota. — Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John 70-84 (2005)
Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy- Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1), Wu, C. L.
sis Method. Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H. 70-84 (2005). Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models
Xiang: 10(4), 288-94 (2005).
Traver, Robert G. in Yangtze River. — K. W. Chau, C. L. Wu, and
Singh, Vijay P. Y. S. Li; 10(6), 485-91 (2005).
Watershed-Scale Evaluation of a System of Storm
Relating Local Stage and Remote Discharge with
Water Detention Basins. — Clay H. Emerson, Wu, Jy S.
Significant Lateral Inflow. — Tommaso Mora-
Claire Welty, and Robert G. Traver; 10(3), Artificial Neural Networks for Forecasting Water-
marco, Silvia Barbetta, Florisa Melone, and
Vijay P. Singh; 10(1), 58-69 (2005) 237-42 (2005). shed Runoff and Stream Flows. — Jy S. Wu, Jun
Han, Shastri Annambhotla, and Scott Bryant;
Frequency Analysis of Flood Damage. — L. Zhang Trefry, Christopher M. 10(3), 216-22 (2005).
and Vijay P. Singh: 10(2), 100-9 (2005). Regional Rainfall Frequency Analysis for the State
Roll Waves in Overland Flow. — Q. Q. Liu, L. of Michigan. — Christopher M. Trefry, David Wurbs, Ralph A.
Chen, J. C. Li, and Vijay P. Singh: 10(2', 110-7 Incorporation of Climate Change in Water Avail-
W. Watkins, Jr, and Dennis Johnson; 10(6),
(2005) ye : ability Modeling. — Ralph A. Wurbs, Ranjan S.
437-49 (2005).
Smith, Ronald Muttiah, and Fabrice Felden; 10(5), 375-85
Simulation of a Semipermanent Wetland Basin in Valdes, Juan B. (2005).
the Cottonwood Lake Area, East-Central North Synthetic Generation of Hydrologic Time Series Xiang, H.
Dakota. — Rosemary Carroll, Greg Pohll, John Based on Nonparametric Random Generation. Plot Erosion Model Using Gray Relational Analy-
Tracy, Tom Winter, and Ronald Smith; 10(1), - Tae-Woong Kim and Juan B. Valdés; 10(5), sis Method. — Q. Q. Liu, V. P. Singh, and H.
70-84 (2005). 395-404 (2005). Xiang; 10(4), 288-94 (2005).
536 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005