Israel and Palestine Israel and Palestine Alternative Perspectives on Statehood Edited by John Ehrenberg and Yoav Peled ROWMAN&LITTLEFIELD Lanham•Boulder•NewYork•London PublishedbyRowman&Littlefield AwhollyownedsubsidiaryofTheRowman&LittlefieldPublishingGroup,Inc. 4501ForbesBoulevard,Suite200,Lanham,Maryland20706 www.rowman.com UnitA,WhitacreMews,26-34StannaryStreet,LondonSE114AB Copyright©2016byRowman&Littlefield Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinanyformorbyany electronicormechanicalmeans,includinginformationstorageandretrievalsystems, withoutwrittenpermissionfromthepublisher,exceptbyareviewerwhomayquote passagesinareview. BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationInformationAvailable LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData Names:Ehrenberg,John,1944-author.|Peled,Yoav,author. Title:IsraelandPalestine:alternativeperspectivesonstatehood/JohnEhrenbergandYoavPeled. Description:Lanham:Rowman&LittlefieldEducation,2016.|Includesbibliographicalreferences andindex. Identifiers:LCCN2016013463(print)|LCCN2016014452(ebook)|ISBN9781442245075(cloth: alk.paper)|ISBN9781442245082(electronic) Subjects:LCSH:Arab-Israeliconflict--1993---Peace.|Israel--Politicsandgovernment--1993-|Pal- estinianArabs--Politicsandgovernment--1993- Classification:LCCDS119.76.E3952016(print)|LCCDS119.76(ebook)|DDC956.9405/4--dc23 TMThepaperusedinthispublicationmeetstheminimumrequirementsofAmerican NationalStandardforInformationSciencesPermanenceofPaperforPrintedLibrary Materials,ANSI/NISOZ39.48-1992. PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica Contents Introduction vii JohnEhrenberg PartI:Overviews 1 1 FacingtheMusic:Israel,Palestine,andthePoliticsofPartisan Delusions 3 StephenEricBronner 2 MakingSenseoftheNakba:AriShavit,BaruchMarzel,and ZionistClaimstoTerritory 17 IanS.Lustick 3 IsraelandtheClosingoftheAmericanJewishMind 41 RichardSilverstein 4 TheRootCausesofEnduringConflict:CanIsraelandPalestine Co-exist? 63 JeffryA.Frieden 5 ReclaimingHumanRights:AnAlternativeApproachtothe Israeli-PalestinianConflict 77 MichelineIshayandDavidKretzmer PartII:TwoStates 95 6 NotExactlyApartheid:TheDynamicsofSettlerColonialism andMilitaryOccupation 97 HonaidaGhanim 7 TheOne-StateDelusion 115 AssafSharon v vi Contents 8 ToWhatExtentReconciliation?:AnAnalysisoftheGeneva AccordbetweenIsraelisandPalestinians 133 YoavKapshuk 9 OneCountryTwoStates:PlanningtheAlternativeSpatial RelationsbetweenPalestineandIsraelFromBacktoBackto FacetoFace 159 RassemKhamaisi PartIII:TheOne-StateAlternative 185 10 TheWayForwardintheMiddleEast 187 HoritHermanPeledandYoavPeled 11 TheOne-StateSolutionandtheIsraeli-PalestinianConflict: PalestinianChallengesandProspects 201 LeilaFarsakh 12 AOne-StateSolution?:Froma“StruggleuntoDeath”to “Master-Slave”Dialectics 223 RaefZreik 13 PastandPresentPerfectofIsrael’sOne-StateSolution 243 MosheBehar 14 TowardaSharedVisionofIsraelandIsrael/Palestine 271 OrenBarak 15 NeitherOnenorTwo:ReflectionsaboutaSharedFuturein Israel-Palestine 279 LevGrinberg 16 BetweenOneandTwo:ApartheidorConfederationforIsrael/ Palestine?TranscriptofAddresstotheConference“OneState betweentheMediterraneanSeaandtheJordanRiver—ADream orReality?” 305 OrenYiftachel 17 BeyondTraditionalSovereigntyTheoryinConflictResolution: LessonsfromIsrael/Palestine 337 AmalJamal Conclusion:OutoftheDarkness 365 JohnEhrenberg Contributors 371 Index 377 Introduction John Ehrenberg THEPICTURE On November 9, 2004, Visam Thiem, a twenty-eight year-old Palestinian music student at Al-Najah University in Nablus, left his home in the Al- Farah refugee camp in the West Bank to go to a violin lesson in a nearby village. As he entered the Beit Iba checkpoint near Nablus, Horit Herman Peled was there with other members of the human rights group Mashsom (Checkpoint) Watch as part of their campaign to document and monitor the conduct of Israeli troops. While army officers inspected Thiem’s papers, he said, they asked him to “play something sad to match their mood.” Ms. Herman Peled,arenownedIsraeli mediaartist,academic, andcontributorto thisvolume,capturedamomentofthetwo-minuteencounterinaremarkable video that caused a sensation in Israel and beyond. A haunting image from herfilmgracesthecoverofthisbook. Hopingthathecouldgetthroughthecheckpointandmakeittohislesson, Thiem played. As he did, Ms. Peled’s picture captured other people who were squashed between the electronic gate behind them and the soldiers in front. The blindfolded face of an incarcerated young Palestinian man was visible through the rusty bars of a tiny cell. Out of camera range, an open shack was crammed with young men whose identification papers had failed to satisfy the soldiers. It was all familiar and banal, an everyday occurrence intheOccupiedTerritories. Two weeks after Ms. Herman Peled posted the video on her website, it was picked up by an Israeli newspaper and was reproduced internationally. The resulting debate in the print media, on talk shows, and on dozens of Internet blogs lasted almost a month—a long time in this day and age. Like vii viii Introduction thepictureitself,theflurryofactivitypeeledbacklayersofmythandreality, dreamandmemory,factandfiction,pastandpresent. An Israeli Defense Force spokesman initially claimed that Thiem had volunteered to play for the guards. The incident occurred toward the end of the Second Intifada, and the army was understandably nervous about the violin and its case. But the media clamor about the incident forced a recon- sideration, and the Israeli Defense Force’s subsequent acknowledgment that the soldiers had been “insensitive” but “deal with a complex and dangerous reality”atthecheckpointsfailedtosettletheissue. On the surface, the incident was just another moment in the tangled relations between Israelis and Palestinians. But there was much more to the picture, and to the reaction it generated, than meets the eye. Some Israelis denouncedtheguardsforpersonifying thedaily harassmentsthat are part of life in the Occupied Territories. Others called attention to the routinized “sadism” that comes from policing an unwilling population. But the truly suffocating Israeli criticism had nothing to do with the Occupation. Not directly,atanyrate. Checkpoints and border guards immediately raised the memory of the Holocaust—thepermanentcenterofgravitythatliesattheheartoftheState ofIsrael.TheimageofdoomedmusiciansbeingforcedtoplayfortheirNazi tormentorsisapowerfulimageinthevastarrayofHolocaustimagery,andit turned out that someof thearmy’sIsraeli critics weremore interestedin the sanctityofJewishvictimhoodthaninwhathappensintheOccupiedTerrito- ries. Indeed, The Guardian reported that some critics worried that Jewish suffering had been diminished by the Army’s humiliation of Mr. Tayem. It quoted Yoram Kaniuk, the distinguished Israeli author, who wrote in an Israelinewspaperthatthesoldiersresponsibleshouldbeputontrial “notfor abusing Arabs but for disgracing the Holocaust. Of all the terrible things done at the roadblocks,” he said, “this story is one which negates the very possibility of the existence of Israel as a Jewish state. If [the military] does not put these soldiers on trial we will have no moral right to speak of our- selvesas astatethat rosefromtheHolocaust.Ifweallow Jewishsoldiersto put an Arab violinist at a roadblock and laugh at him,” he continued, “we have succeeded in arriving at the lowest moral point possible. Our entire existenceinthisArabregionwasjustified,andisstilljustified,byoursuffer- ing;byJewishviolinistsinthecamps.” Legitimizingnarrativesthatdrawonadeepwellofvictimizationarenota monopoly of any particular group, and Palestinian organizations are just as proneastheIsraelistatetousepastinjuriesasjustificationforpresentobsti- nacy.Thepastisoftenmarshalledtolegitimizethepresent,andtheNakbaof 1948 serves much the same purpose as the Holocaust in preventing either party from moving toward a negotiated solution to the longest and most destructive conflict in contemporary world politics. For Israelis, sanctifying Introduction ix the Holocaust creates an immovable rock that can be called upon to justify whateverthestatedoes.The dispossessionandexpulsionof 1948serves the samefunctionforPalestinians.Bothhavebeennormalizedassacredmemo- ry,legitimizingnarrativesthatconferrighteousnessandblockresolution.For Israel, the memory of Jewish suffering in the past trumps the reality of Palestiniansufferingin thepresent. Foritsopponents, thememoryof Pales- tinian expulsion in the past trumps the reality of Israeli existence in the present. The deeply held conviction of the Israelis that they stand alone against the hordes who would exterminate them is mirrored by the equally powerful Palestinian conviction that they must stand alone against a world that has abandoned and betrayed them. What changes is the environment. The dialectic of history can transform victims into victimizers, victimizers intovictims. Little has changed in the years since Ms. Peled’s picture was taken, and the cover picture is still a metaphor for Israelis and Palestinians alike. More than that, it serves to introduce an urgent debate among Israeli Jews, Israeli Palestinians, and Palestinians living in the Occupied Territories about the contours of the present and the possibility of reframing the issues for a settlement that could be acceptable to the contending parties. That debate is anongoingone,andtheintensitywithwhichitiscarriedonisatestamentto the accumulated sense of grievance—and to the importance of the imagined stakes for everyone. It takes place in a variety of venues and features a variety of participants. Sooner or later, all these debates have to engage fundamental questions of state formation and state legitimacy that offer a possiblepathtoresolutionevenastheyposethemostserioustheoreticaland practicalobstaclestopeace. But to say that there’s a debate doesn’t mean that it’s going anywhere. Indeed,there’snotmuchofadebateatthemoment.Theentiresituationisat a frozen impasse, the parties dug into old positions, the Obama Administra- tionallbutadmittingthatitwillbeunabletobrokerabreakthroughbeforeit leaves office, the international community preoccupied by a different set of problems.Thepresentvolumeoriginatedinthismomentofdeadlyparalysis. On May 17, 2011, The Public Sphere, a Hebrew journal published by the PoliticalScienceDepartmentatTelAvivUniversity,organizedaconference whoseproceedingswerelaterpublishedinaspecialissue(No.6).“OneState Between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River—Reality or Dream?” sounds like a typical title for a scholarly meeting, but the participants were anythingbuttypical.IsraeliJews,IsraeliPalestinians,andPalestiniansliving in the Occupied Territories took part—a group of respected activists and scholars whose collaboration at this meeting was remarkable. The series of essays that emerged from the conference raised basic questions of possible stateorganizationatamomentwhentherushofeventsseemstobesweeping
Description: