innovation for the 21st century This page intentionally left blank innovation for the 21st century harnessing the power of intellectual property and antitrust law michael a. carrier oxford university press 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press Oxford University Press is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press, Inc. _____________________________________________ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carrier, Michael A. Innovation for the 21st century: harnessing the power of intellectual property and antitrust law/ Michael A. Carrier. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-534258-1 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Intellectual property--United States. 2. Antitrust law--United States. I. Title. KF3116.C37 2009 346.7304’8--dc22 2008042087 _____________________________________________ First printing in paperback, 2010 ISBN 9780199794287 (paperback : alk. paper) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Note to Readers This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is based upon sources believed to be accurate and reliable and is intended to be current as of the time it was written. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Also, to confi rm that the information has not been affected or changed by recent developments, traditional legal research techniques should be used, including checking primary sources where appropriate. (Based on the Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations.) You may order this or any other Oxford University Press publication by visiting the Oxford University Press website at www.oup.com contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 i. primer Chapter 1. Innovation 19 Chapter 2. Intellectual Property 35 Chapter 3. Antitrust 55 Chapter 4. Antitrust and IP: 20th Century 71 Chapter 5. Antitrust and IP: 21st Century 87 ii. copyright Chapter 6. Pioneering Peer-to-Peer and Other Disruptive Dual-Use Technologies 105 Chapter 7. Damaging Copyright Damages 147 Chapter 8. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: From Pirates to User Innovators 163 iii. patent Chapter 9. Better Patents: A Post-Grant Opposition Procedure 205 Chapter 10. Less Dangerous Patents: A Framework for Relief 231 Chapter 11. Biotechnology Dilemma 1: Patented Research Tools and Experimental Use 253 Chapter 12. Biotechnology Dilemma 2: Material Transfer Agreements 279 iv. antitrust Chapter 13. Innovation Markets: Saving Lives and Money in the Pharmaceutical Industry 295 Chapter 14. Supporting Standard-Setting Organizations 323 Chapter 15. Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality 345 Conclusion 383 Index 385 This page intentionally left blank acknowledgments No book of this scope can be accomplished single-handedly. I received helpful comments from Chris Anderson, Jon Baker, Jonathan Band, Mike Carroll, Perry Dane, Don Dodge, Harry First, Bert Foer, Shubha Ghosh, Rich Gilbert, Scott Hemphill, Renata Hesse, Gwen Hinze, Stephen Horowitz, Herb Hovenkamp, Mark Janis, Greg Lastowka, Anne Layne-Farrar, Mark Lemley, Christopher Leslie, Gail Levine, Jason Mendelson, Michael Meurer, Joe Miller, Joe Milowic, Brian Nester, Sean O’Connor, Mark Popofsky, Tony Reese, Bill Rosenblatt, Pamela Samuelson, Josh Sarnoff, F.M. Scherer, Dave Schwartz, Ephraim Schwartz, Greg Sidak, Katherine Strandburg, Jay Thomas, Eric von Hippel, Dave Weisberg, Phil Weiser, Kevin Werbach, and Christopher Yoo. In addition, s tudents in seminars I taught at Rutgers Law School in the 2007–2008 year offered useful feedback on my proposals. I have also benefi ted from the excellent work of many research assistants. Assisting in the early stages of research were Alex Gonzalez, Philip Jon, Mike Koptiw, Jon Marshfi eld, Ryan Murphy, Jon Pentzien, and Dave Tseng. Giving up even more of their time to add impressive contributions in later stages were Lionel Cassin, Katie Coyne, Llewy Davis, Erin Fitzgerald, Brian Fitzsimons, Sean Neafsey, and Ryan Strauss. A scholar can ask for no better law school dean than Ray Solomon, who has consistently and enthusiastically supported my work in so many indispensable ways. Jay Feinman and Dennis Patterson have been generous mentors through- out this project as well as my academic career. Lori Rowland cheerfully kept on top of my personal library of interlibrary loans. Fran Brigandi reliably kept on top of everything else, providing sterling administrative support and never letting any of my thousands of sources slip through the cracks. Going back further in time, I would like to thank my parents, Judy Carrier and Peter Carrier, who taught me so much about the importance of passion and perseverance, as well as effective writing. Fast–forwarding to the present, I am thankful for the support I have received from my two daughters, Jordan and Brooke Carrier. Throughout the duration of this project, fi ve-year-old Jordan has written numerous “books.” I will always remember the untold hours of her sitting by my side studiously doing her “work.” And I fear I may also bear some responsibility for three-year-old Brooke’s infatuation with colored tape fl ags, whose many purposes I never fathomed. My highest gratitude is reserved for my wife, Sharri Horowitz. Sharri has shown more patience and understanding than anyone could reasonably (or unrea- sonably) ask. I could never have written a book of this scope in 12 months without her unfl agging support and tolerance of nights and weekends at the keyboard. In allowing me to pursue my dream, I am eternally grateful to Sharri. This page intentionally left blank introduction Innovation 2 Innovation’s Laws 3 Innovation’s Confl ict 4 Innovation’s Urgency 5 Innovation’s Solution: Primer 5 Innovation’s Solution: Copyrights 6 Innovation’s Solution: Patents 7 Innovation’s Solution: Antitrust 9 Innovation’s Solution: Innovation 10 Global Application 11 The Road Map 12 Innovation is crucial to us. It is our iPods. Our YouTubes. Our prescription drugs. Our LPs becoming CDs becoming MP3 fi les. We may not always focus on innovation’s importance. But we cannot imagine life without it. Nor is it just us, consumers in American society. Economists, who do not often see eye to eye, have consistently emphasized the signifi cant role that innovation plays in economic growth. Innovation, however, has been threatened in recent years. Part of the blame, surprisingly enough, lies with the U.S. legal system. The antitrust laws have not suffi ciently appreciated innovation. Nor have the intellectual property (IP) regimes—in particular, patent and copyright law. In certain cases, the laws have even stifl ed innovation. This book aims to reverse this trend. It offers ten ambitious proposals to foster innovation. The proposals address generic drugs, BlackBerry devices, valid patents, peer-to-peer (P2P) software, and countless other cutting-edge challenges. They promise to improve our patent system. They show how copyright law can promote innovation and not quash fl edgling technologies. And they illustrate how antitrust can incorporate innovation, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. Of the patent, copyright, and antitrust regimes, the patent system’s effects on innovation have received the most attention. Countless books and editorials as well as congressional legislation have sought to remedy the adverse effects of patents. As I show in my proposals, there is still room for better patents, less dangerous patents, and recommendations for the biotechnology industry. The effects of copyright law, in contrast, have been neglected. Courts have crafted elaborate tests to distinguish benefi cial from infringing uses of technolo- gies like P2P software. But such tests have created litigation land mines. I address these and other copyright hurdles to innovation.
Description: