IDENTIFYING COST SAVINGS THROUGH ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES IN MECHANICALLY AERATED ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESSES IN SOUTHEAST FLORIDA by Eric Stanley A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The College of Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL May 2012 IDENTIFYINGCOSTSAVINGS THROUGHENERGYCONSERVATIONl\ffiASURES IN l\ffiCHANICALLYAERATED ACTIVATEDSLUDGE TREATMENTPROCESSESINSOUTHEAST FLORIDA By Eric Stanley This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate's thesis advisor, Dr. Frederick Bloetscher, Departmentof Civil, Environmental, and Geomatics Engineering" and.has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of theCollege ofEngineering andComputer Science and was accepted inpartial fulfillmentoftherequirementsforthedegree ofMaster ofScience. SUPERVISORYCOMMITTEE: eoerickBloetscher,Ph.D.,P.E. Thesis Advi r ,Ph.D. ...._;:J-C- Panagiotis D.Scaralatos, Ph.D.. Chair, DepartmentofCivil,Environmeniii , andGeomatics Engineering MohammadIlyas, Ph.D. Interim Dean, CollegeofEngineering andComputerScience b·l/~/ 'UJ1'2. Barry T.R son,Ph.D. Date .. Dean, Graduate College ii ABSTRACT Author: Eric Stanley Title: Identifying Cost Savings through Energy Conservation Measures in Mechanically Aerated Activated Sludge Treatment Processes in Southeast Florida Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Frederick Bloetscher Degree: Master of Science Year: 2012 This thesis presents a model which estimates energy and cost savings that can be realized by implementing Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) at mechanically aerated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in southeast Florida. Historical plant monitoring data is used to estimate savings achieved by implementing innovative aeration technologies which include; 1) Fine Bubble Diffusers; 2) Single-Stage Turbo Blowers; 3) Automatic Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Control. Key assumptions for modeling performance of each technology are researched and discussed, such as trends in the future cost of electricity, efficiency of blowers, and practical average DO levels for each scenario. Capital cost estimates and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs are estimated to complete life-cycle cost and payback analyses. The benefits are quantified on an individual and cumulative basis, to identify which technologies are cost-beneficial. The results demonstrate that levels of payback of 20 years or less are available at the three WWTPs studied. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank his wife, Tatyana, without whose love and support nothing would be possible. The author also wishes to thank his employer, Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., including senior engineers and coworkers, for providing a dynamic workplace environment supportive of furthering understanding of complex engineering issues. The help of the utilities officials including Norm Wellings, Gabe Destio, and Ed Catalano with the City of Boca Raton, and Chuck Flynn with the City of Plantation, was instrumental in furthering the progress of this work. Lastly, the author would like to thank his thesis committee, including Frederick Bloetscher, Ph.D., P.E., and Daniel Meerof, Ph.D, for their guidance in completing this thesis. iv IDENTIFYING COST SAVINGS THROUGH ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES IN MECHANICALLY AERATED ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESSES IN SOUTHEAST FLORIDA LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... xiii I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of the Aeration Process ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Less Efficient Mechanical Aeration Versus More Efficient Fine-Bubble Diffused Aeration ........ 5 1.3 Less Efficient Multi-stage Centrifugal Blowers Versus More Efficient Single-stage Turbo Blowers ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Less Efficient Manual DO Control Versus More Efficient Automatic DO Control ...................... 7 1.5 Combining Technologies to Optimize Efficiency ........................................................................ 10 1.6 Summary of Facilities Studied ..................................................................................................... 11 II - LITERATURE REVIEW – DISCUSSION OF THE STATE OF THE ART IN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS CONTROL AND KEY MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ............................................ 13 2.1 Energy Conservation Measure Case Studies ................................................................................ 13 2.2 Fine Bubble Diffusers .................................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Blower Technology ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 DO Control Strategy ................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Manual Control ........................................................................................................................ 23 2.4.2 Automatic DO Control ............................................................................................................. 24 2.4.3 DO Probes ................................................................................................................................ 25 2.4.4 Modulating Valves ................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.5 Flow Meters ............................................................................................................................. 26 2.5 Piping ........................................................................................................................................... 27 v 2.6 Summary of Technologies ........................................................................................................... 27 2.7 Key Assumptions For Aeration Model ........................................................................................ 28 2.7.1 DO Levels ................................................................................................................................ 28 2.7.2 Blower Efficiency Assumptions .............................................................................................. 30 2.7.3 Flowrate Assumptions ............................................................................................................. 30 2.7.4 Aeration Modeling Global Assumptions ................................................................................. 31 III. LITERATURE REVIEW – COST ESTIMATING METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS ...................... 33 3.1 Cost Estimate Level of Accuracy ................................................................................................ 33 3.2 Life Cycle Cost Analysis Method And Assumptions .................................................................. 35 3.3 Capital Cost ................................................................................................................................. 41 3.3.1 Cost of Blower Technology ..................................................................................................... 42 3.3.2 Cost of Fine Bubble Diffused Aeration Technology ............................................................... 43 3.3.3 Foregone Capital Replacement Costs and Salvage Value ........................................................ 43 3.4 Operation and Maintenance Costs ............................................................................................... 44 IV. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 46 4.1 Identifying Specific Energy Conservation Measures .................................................................. 46 4.2 Lifecycle Cost Analysis of ECMs ................................................................................................ 46 4.2.1 Historical Plant Data ................................................................................................................ 49 4.2.2 Estimating Yield ...................................................................................................................... 50 4.2.3 Project Future Flows and Loadings ......................................................................................... 52 4.2.4 Calculate Oxygen Requirement and Required Air Flowrates .................................................. 53 4.2.5 Size Process Air Piping ............................................................................................................ 66 4.2.6 Estimate Headloss Through Pipes and Create System Curve .................................................. 68 4.2.7 Size Blowers ............................................................................................................................ 73 4.2.8 Estimate Capital Cost ............................................................................................................... 77 4.2.9 Estimate O&M and Foregone Capital Replacement Costs ...................................................... 78 4.2.10 Energy Baseline – Estimated Energy Consumption of Existing Mechanical Aerators ............ 79 vi 4.2.11 Complete Life Cycle Cost Analysis ......................................................................................... 81 4.2.12 Model Accuracy Verification................................................................................................... 86 V. PLANT ECM ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................. 93 5.1 City of Boca Raton WWTP ......................................................................................................... 93 5.1.1 Boca Raton WWTP - Existing Secondary Treatment .............................................................. 93 5.1.2 Boca Raton WWTP –Influent and Effluent Water Quality ...................................................... 95 5.1.3 Boca Raton WWTP – Proposed ECM Design ......................................................................... 96 5.1.4 Boca Raton WWTP - Results and Discussion ......................................................................... 97 5.1.5 Boca Raton WWTP - Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................ 101 5.2 Broward County North Regional WWTP .................................................................................. 102 5.2.1 Broward County North Regional WWTP - Existing Secondary Treatment .......................... 102 5.2.2 Broward County North Regional WWTP –Influent and Effluent Water Quality .................. 103 5.2.3 Broward County North Regional WWTP – Plant Specific Methodology Considerations .................................................................................................................................... 104 5.2.4 Broward County North Regional WWTP – Proposed ECM Design ..................................... 106 5.2.5 Broward County North Regional WWTP – Results and Discussion ..................................... 107 5.2.6 Broward County North Regional WWTP - Sensitivity Analysis ........................................... 112 5.3 Plantation Regional WWTP ...................................................................................................... 113 5.3.1 Plantation Regional WWTP - Existing Secondary Treatment .............................................. 113 5.3.2 Plantation Regional WWTP – Influent and Effluent Water Quality ...................................... 113 5.3.3 Plantation Regional WWTP – Proposed ECM Design .......................................................... 115 5.3.4 Plantation Regional WWTP – Results and Discussion ......................................................... 115 5.3.5 Plantation Regional WWTP - Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................... 119 VI. DISCUSSION AND COMPARISON OF RESULTS .......................................................................... 121 6.1 Improvement of Efficiency Comparison and Analysis .............................................................. 121 6.2 Capital Cost Comparison and Analysis .................................................................................... 125 6.3 Payback Comparison and Analysis ............................................................................................ 128 vii 6.4 Sensitivity Analysis Comparison ............................................................................................... 132 6.5 Total Savings And Regional Savings ......................................................................................... 136 6.6 Current Energy Intensity Discrepancy and Potential Operational Modifications at Plantation Regional WWTP .................................................................................................................... 136 6.7 Ocean Outfall Rule Compliance ................................................................................................ 142 6.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................ 144 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 146 7.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 146 7.2 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 151 APPENDICES ............................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. BIBILIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................... 268 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 – Study Facility Summary ............................................................................................................. 12 Table 2.1 – General ECM Case Study Survey .............................................................................................. 14 Table 2.2 - Fine Bubble Diffuser Technologies with Highest SOTE’s ......................................................... 18 Table 2.3 – Blower Technology Comparison ................................................................................................ 23 Table 2.4 – Summary of Technologies .......................................................................................................... 28 Table 2.5 – Manual DO Control - Case Study DO Levels ............................................................................ 29 Table 2.6 – Automatic DO Control – Case Study DO Levels ....................................................................... 30 Table 3.1 - AACE Estimate Class Level Characteristics (Christensen, 2005) .............................................. 34 Table 3.2 – 2006 – 2011 AEO Report Average Predicted US Electricity Annual Real Inflation Rates .............................................................................................................................................................. 39 Table 3.3 – 2011 AEO Report Base and Side Case Assumptions ................................................................. 39 Table 3.4 – Cost of Blower Technologies ..................................................................................................... 42 Table 3.5 – Cost of Fine Bubble Diffusers .................................................................................................... 43 Table 3.6 – Major Equipment Requiring Eventual Replacement .................................................................. 44 Table 3.7 – Major Equipment Requiring Eventual Replacement .................................................................. 45 Table 4.1 – Summary of Methodology .......................................................................................................... 48 Table 4.2 – Boca Raton WWTP– Incremental Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ..................................................... 52 Table 4.3 – Key Assumptions for ECMs ....................................................................................................... 57 Table 4.4 – Extreme Weather Design Conditions ......................................................................................... 74 Table 4.5 – Power Factor .............................................................................................................................. 80 Table 4.6 – Predicted SCFM vs. Standard Oxygen Requirement based on Loading .................................... 90 ix Table 4.7 – Model Verification Sensitivity Analysis .................................................................................... 90 Table 4.8 – Mechanically Aerated Module A, B, vs. Fine Bubble Aerated Module C Measured Energy Usage Comparison ............................................................................................................................ 91 Table 4.9 – Model Efficiency Gain Prediction Vs. Actual Efficiency Gain Prediction ................................ 92 Table 5.1 – Study Facility Summary ............................................................................................................. 93 Table 5.2 - Aeration Basin Characteristics .................................................................................................... 94 Table 5.3 - Mechanical Aeration Characteristics .......................................................................................... 94 Table 5.4 - Diffused Aeration Characteristics ............................................................................................... 94 Table 5.5 - Blower Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 95 Table 5.6 – Boca Raton WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Based on 2007-2009 Flow/Loading Data ............................................................................................................................................................... 95 Table 5.7 – Boca Raton WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Adjusted to Est. 2011-2031 Avg Flowrate ......................................................................................................................................................... 96 Table 5.8 – Boca Raton WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Adjusted to Design Flow ................................ 96 Table 5.9 – Life Cycle Cost Analyses Estimated Costs ................................................................................ 97 Table 5.10 – Life Cycle Cost Analyses Estimated Savings ........................................................................... 97 Table 5.11 – Boca Raton WWTP– Incremental Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ................................................... 99 Table 5.12 – Boca Raton WWTP – Payback Sensitivity Analysis .............................................................. 101 Table 5.13 - Aeration Basin Characteristics – Modules A and B ................................................................ 103 Table 5.14 - Mechanical Aeration Characteristics – Modules A and B ...................................................... 103 Table 5.15 – Broward Co. N. Regional WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Based on 2004-2006 ............. 104 Table 5.16 – Broward Co. N. Regional WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Adjusted to Est. 2011- 2031 Avg Flow ............................................................................................................................................ 104 Table 5.17 – Broward Co. N. Regional WWTP – Design Influent/Effluent Adjusted to Design Flow ............................................................................................................................................................ 104 Table 5.18 – 2004-2006 # of Basins In Service vs. Flowrate ...................................................................... 105 Table 5.19 – Projected Module D Energy Reduction .................................................................................. 106 Table 5.20 – Life Cycle Cost Analyses Estimated Costs ............................................................................ 107 Table 5.21 – Life Cycle Cost Analyses Estimated Savings ......................................................................... 108 x
Description: