ERIC ED545010: The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 State Snapshot Report. South Carolina. Grade 8, Public Schools

2013·0.46 MB·English

by  ERIC

South Carolina
Reading
Grade 8
2013 State Snapshot Report Public Schools
Overall Results Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score Results
(cid:132) In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in South
Carolina was 261. This was lower than the average score of 266
for public school students in the nation.
(cid:132) The average score for students in South Carolina in 2013 (261)
was not significantly different from their average score in 2011
(260) and was higher than their average score in 1998 (255).
(cid:132) The score gap between higher performing students in South
Carolina (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing
students (those at the 25th percentile) was 45 points in 2013. This
performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1998
(45 points).
(cid:132) The percentage of students in South Carolina who performed at or
above the NAEP Proficient level was 29 percent in 2013. This
percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (27
percent) and was greater than that in 1998 (22 percent).
(cid:132) The percentage of students in South Carolina who performed at or *Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2013. Significance
tests were performed using unrounded numbers.
above the NAEP Basic level was 73 percent in 2013. This a Accommodations not permitted. For information about NAEP
percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (72 accommodations, see
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx.
percent) and was greater than that in 1998 (66 percent).
NOTE:Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.
Compare the Average Score in 2013 to Other States/Jurisdictions Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation (public)
¹Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools).
In 2013, the average score in South Carolina (261) was
(cid:132) lower than those in 35 states/jurisdictions
(cid:132) higher than those in 6 states/jurisdictions * Speigrnfoifrimcaendt lyu sdiniffge ruennrto (upn d<e .d0 5n)u fmrobme r2s0.13. Significance tests were
(cid:132) not significantly different from those in 10 states/jurisdictions
NOTE: For information about NAEP accommodations, see
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx.
Results for Student Groups in 2013 Score Gaps for Student Groups
Percentages (cid:132) In 2013, Black students had an average score that was 24
Percent of Avg. at or above Percent at points lower than White students. This performance gap
Reporting Groups students score Basic Proficient Advanced was not significantly different from that in 1998 (25 points).
Race/Ethnicity (cid:132) In 2013, Hispanic students had an average score that was
White 55 271 82 39 4 14 points lower than White students. Data are not reported
Black 36 247 58 14 # for Hispanic students in 1998, because reporting standards
Hispanic 5 257 70 24 2 were not met.
Asian 2 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (cid:132) In 2013, female students in South Carolina had an average
American Indian/Alaska Native # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ score that was higher than male students by 12 points.
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (cid:132) In 2013, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price
Two or more races 2 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ school lunch, an indicator of low family income, had an
Gender average score that was 25 points lower than students who
Male 50 256 67 23 2 were not eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch. This
Female 50 267 78 35 3 performance gap was not significantly different from that in
National School Lunch Program 1998 (26 points).
Eligible 54 250 62 17 1
Not eligible 46 275 86 44 5
# Rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met.
NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the
"Information not available" category for the National School Lunch Program,
which provides free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes
African American and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude
Hispanic origin.
NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1998–2013 Reading Assessments.