Table Of Content

Washington Mathematics Grade 8 2013 State Snapshot Report Public Schools Overall Results Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score Results (cid:132) In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Washington was 290. This was higher than the average score of 284 for public school students in the nation. (cid:132) The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (290) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (288) and was higher than their average score in 1996 (276). (cid:132) The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 48 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1996 (47 points). (cid:132) The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 42 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (40 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (26 percent). *Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2013. Significance (cid:132) The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or a tAecsctso mwemroed paetirofonrsm neodt upseirnmgi tutendro. uFnodr eindf onrummabtieorns .about NAEP above the NAEP Basic level was 79 percent in 2013. This accommodations, see http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx. percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (77 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (67 percent). NOTE:Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Compare the Average Score in 2013 to Other States/Jurisdictions Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation (public) ¹Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). In 2013, the average score in Washington (290) was (cid:132) lower than those in 5 states/jurisdictions (cid:132) higher than those in 33 states/jurisdictions * Speigrnfoifrimcaendt lyu sdiniffge ruennrto (upn d<e .d0 5n)u fmrobme r2s0.13. Significance tests were (cid:132) not significantly different from those in 13 states/jurisdictions NOTE: For information about NAEP accommodations, see http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx. Results for Student Groups in 2013 Score Gaps for Student Groups Percentages (cid:132) In 2013, Black students had an average score that was 27 Percent of Avg. at or above Percent at points lower than White students. This performance gap Reporting Groups students score Basic Proficient Advanced was not significantly different from that in 1996 (38 points). Race/Ethnicity (cid:132) In 2013, Hispanic students had an average score that was White 59 296 85 48 14 23 points lower than White students. This performance gap Black 4 269 59 23 3 was narrower than that in 1996 (33 points). Hispanic 22 273 65 23 3 (cid:132) In 2013, male students in Washington had an average Asian 7 310 88 67 30 score that was not significantly different from female American Indian/Alaska Native 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ students. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (cid:132) In 2013, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price Two or more races 6 293 85 44 11 school lunch, an indicator of low family income, had an Gender average score that was 26 points lower than students who Male 52 290 78 42 13 were not eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch. This Female 48 289 79 41 10 performance gap was not significantly different from that in National School Lunch Program 1996 (24 points). Eligible 44 276 67 26 5 Not eligible 56 301 88 54 17 ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information not available" category for the National School Lunch Program, which provides free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes African American and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin. NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1996–2013 Mathematics Assessments.

ebook img

ERIC ED544997: The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools PDF

2013·0.41 MB·English
by  ERIC
#additional_collections #ericarchive
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Upgrade Premium
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC ED544997: The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 State Snapshot Report. Washington. Grade 8, Public Schools

Washington Mathematics Grade 8 2013 State Snapshot Report Public Schools Overall Results Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score Results (cid:132) In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Washington was 290. This was higher than the average score of 284 for public school students in the nation. (cid:132) The average score for students in Washington in 2013 (290) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (288) and was higher than their average score in 1996 (276). (cid:132) The score gap between higher performing students in Washington (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 48 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 1996 (47 points). (cid:132) The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 42 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (40 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (26 percent). *Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2013. Significance (cid:132) The percentage of students in Washington who performed at or a tAecsctso mwemroed paetirofonrsm neodt upseirnmgi tutendro. uFnodr eindf onrummabtieorns .about NAEP above the NAEP Basic level was 79 percent in 2013. This accommodations, see http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx. percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (77 percent) and was greater than that in 1996 (67 percent). NOTE:Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Compare the Average Score in 2013 to Other States/Jurisdictions Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation (public) ¹Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). In 2013, the average score in Washington (290) was (cid:132) lower than those in 5 states/jurisdictions (cid:132) higher than those in 33 states/jurisdictions * Speigrnfoifrimcaendt lyu sdiniffge ruennrto (upn d<e .d0 5n)u fmrobme r2s0.13. Significance tests were (cid:132) not significantly different from those in 13 states/jurisdictions NOTE: For information about NAEP accommodations, see http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/inclusion.aspx. Results for Student Groups in 2013 Score Gaps for Student Groups Percentages (cid:132) In 2013, Black students had an average score that was 27 Percent of Avg. at or above Percent at points lower than White students. This performance gap Reporting Groups students score Basic Proficient Advanced was not significantly different from that in 1996 (38 points). Race/Ethnicity (cid:132) In 2013, Hispanic students had an average score that was White 59 296 85 48 14 23 points lower than White students. This performance gap Black 4 269 59 23 3 was narrower than that in 1996 (33 points). Hispanic 22 273 65 23 3 (cid:132) In 2013, male students in Washington had an average Asian 7 310 88 67 30 score that was not significantly different from female American Indian/Alaska Native 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ students. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (cid:132) In 2013, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price Two or more races 6 293 85 44 11 school lunch, an indicator of low family income, had an Gender average score that was 26 points lower than students who Male 52 290 78 42 13 were not eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch. This Female 48 289 79 41 10 performance gap was not significantly different from that in National School Lunch Program 1996 (24 points). Eligible 44 276 67 26 5 Not eligible 56 301 88 54 17 ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information not available" category for the National School Lunch Program, which provides free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes African American and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin. NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1996–2013 Mathematics Assessments.

See more

The list of books you might like

Upgrade Premium
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.
DMCA & Copyright: Dear all, most of the website is community built, users are uploading hundred of books everyday, which makes really hard for us to identify copyrighted material, please contact us if you want any material removed.
Copyright @ PDFdrive.to, 2022 | We love our users