DOCUMENT RESUME ED 367 131 FL 021 603 AUTHOR Hume, Elizabeth, Ed.; McElhinny, Bonnie S., Ed. The COSWL (Committee on the Status of Women in TITLE Linguistics) Collection of Language and Gender Syllabi. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 250p. AVAILABLE FROM Linguistic Society of America, 1325 18th Street, N.W., Suite 211, Washington, DC 20036. PUB TYPE Reference Materials General (130) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Anthropology; Classroom Techniques; *College Curriculum; *Course Content; Educational Strategies; English; Folk Culture; French; German; Graduate Study; Higher Education; *Language Role; *Linguistics; Research Methodology; Second Languages; *Sex Differences; Testing; Undergraduate Study ABSTRACT A collection of 27 syllabi for undergraduate and graduate courses on language and gender is presented. The syllabi come from a variety of departments, including linguistics, anthropology, English, French, German, and folklore. Special features of the collection include: syllabi for undergraduate and graduate courses; ideas for paper topics; examples of exam questions; instructions for field work exercises (gathering and analyzing gender differences in natural speech); bibliographies of works on language and gender; and comments from instructors about teaching the cuurses. The collection is intended as a resource for those developing or teaching a course about language and gender. (MSE) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** The COSWL (Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics) Collection of Language and Gender Syllabi edited by Elizabeth Hume and Bonnie S. McElhinny 1993 -PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE MATERIAL THIS HAS BEEN GRANTED BY U S DEPAPTIMENT OF EDUCATION ktif One e or Educabona, Research and Improvement Ve- E DUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER rERICI nis document has been reprOduced as received from the person or orgamzation originalmg MInom Changes have been made to rmprove TO THE EDUCATIONAL reproductron qualIty RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Points ol view or opimonS stated .n this docu mem do not necessahly represent ofIrcnal OE RI posdion or polICy 2 MOLE BEST COPY INTRODUCTION This collection includes 27 syllabi for courses on language and gender taught in an array of departments (linguistics, anthropology, English, French, German and folklore). Special features of the collection includes: *syllabi for graduate and undergraduate courses *ideas for paper topics *examples of exam questions *instructions for fieldwork exercises (gathering and analyzing gender differences in natural speech) *bibliogaphies of works on language and gender *comments from instructors about teaching the courses We hope this collection will be a resource for anyone interested in teaching language and gender-- whether you are organizing such a course for the first time, looking to update or revise a syllabus for a course taught many times, or hoping to improve a unit on language and gender in a sociolinguistics or other survey source. This project is one response to the LSA's mandate to COSWL (the Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics) to "encourage and support research on language and women." The syllabi here display a number of imaginative approaches to the teaching of a single topic. They also display a considerable commitment to thoughtful pedagogy, to designing syllabi and exercises to stimulate students' thought, and to assembling materials that will allow students to undertake a wide range of relevant projects. It is unfortunately the practice in much of the academy to borrow pedagogical ideas such as these without acknowledgement, though they require thought as intensive as that required for any research project. We hope you will consider citing the sources of your pedagogical ideas when you adapt these exercises and syllabi for your own classroom use as one wtty to accord teaching and thought about teaching the attentions and rewards it does not always receive. This project was coordinated by Elizabeth Hume (Ohio State University, Linguistics) and Bonnie McElhinny (Stanford University, Linguistics). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of a number of people without whose help this project would not have been realized. In particular, we'd like to thank Christina McDougall for her help in compiling the syllabi. In addition, we'd like to thank Chris Barker, Helen Dry, Bob Kaspar and John Lawler for technical advice and assistance, and to thank COSWL members (Dawn Bates, Vicky Bergvall, Janet Bing, Alice Freed, Lynne Murphy, and Craige Roberts) for invaluable comments and suggestions. We also acknowledge the Departments of Linguistics at OSU and Stanford for support given this project, and in particular acknowledge the assistance of Brian Joseph. Finally we thank all those who contributed syllabi. Additional hardcopies of "The COSWL Collection of Language and Gender Syllabi" are available from: Linguistic Society of America 1325 18th Street, NW Suite 211 Washington DC 20036 202/835-1714 Electronic copies are also available on-line in LINGUIST archives (for LINGUIST subscribers) and through anonymous ftp from the Univ. of Michigan file-server (for others). Beth Hume and Bonnie McElhinny, July 1993 3 OBTAINING COPIES FROM THE LINGUIST DATABASE In the archives of LINGUIST, the syllabi are kept in 7 files called: lg-gen-0 syl lg-gen-1 syl --and so forth, through lg-gen-6 syl To retrieve the syllabi, send a message to: [email protected] (if you are on Internet) OR LISTSERV@TAMVM1 (if you are on BITNET) The message should consist of a line or lines like the following: get <filename> <filetype> linguist For example, get lg-gen-1 syl linguist It is possible to request all the syllabi at once by sending one multi-line message consisting of 7 'get' commands; however the files are large, so don't do this unless you can handle large email messages. The listserv will respond only to addresses it recognizes, so be sure to send the request from the address from which you subscribed to LINGUIST. ******** OBTAINING COPIES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FILE-SERVER To obtain copies through ftp from the University of Michigan file-server you must be on Internet. Follow the following procedure: ftp linguistics.archive.umich.edu <at your system prompt> login: anonymous passwd: <type your email address> cd linguistics cd handouts cd syllabi get L-G.Syllabi.0 get L-G.Syllabi.1 get L-G.Syllabi.2 get L-G.Syllabi.3 get L-G.Syllabi.4 get L-G.Syllabi.5 get L-G.Syllabi.6 quit Please note that these syllabi are lodged on a UNIX system. Unix is case-sensitive. If you use upper-case letters instead of lower-case letters, or lower-case letters instead of upper-case letters, it will not recognize your command. Follow the above format carefully. You may not want to obtain all these files at the same time. They take up a considerable amount of diskspace. Use only one or two 'get' commands if diskspace is at a premium. umich.edu' Questions should be directed to 'linguistics-archivists THE COSWL COLLECTION OF LANGUAGE AND GENDER SYLLABI Table of CONTENTS Introduction Overview of Syllabi Syllabi Niko Besnier (Anthropology, Yale) 1. "Language and Gender in Cultural Perspective" 2. Janet Bing (English, Old Dominion) "Language, Gender and Power" 3. Sue Blackwell (English, Univ. of Birmingham) "Language and Gender" 4. Rebecca Burns-Hoffman (English, Univ. of Miami) "Language and Gender 5. Penelope Eckert (IRL) & Sally McConnell-Ginet (Linguistics, Cornell) "Gender and Language Use" 6. Suzanne Fleischmann (French, Berkeley) "Sexual Difference, Gender and the French Language" 7. Alice Freed (Linguistics, Montclair State) "Women, Men and Language" 8. Rebecca Freeman (Education, Penn) "Language and Gender" 9. Barbara Fox (Linguistics, Univ. of Colorado) "Language and Gender" Randy Allen Harris (English, Univ. of Waterloo) 10. "Varieties of English" 11. Shirley Brice Heath (English/Linguistics, Stanford) & Bonnie McElhinny (Linguistics, Stanford) "Language and Gender" Beth Hume (Linguistics, Ohio State) 12. "Language and Gender" Mary Jane Hurst (English, Texas Tech) 13. "Language and Gender" Deborah Kapchan (Folklore Institute, Univ. of 14. Indiana--Bloomington) "The Gender of the Word" Mimi Klaiman (Linguistics, Univ. of Indiana) "Language and Women" 15. Kerstin Lange (Anthropology) 16. "Language, Sex and Gender" Joseph Malone (Columbia) 17. "Gender Systems" Sally McConnell-Ginet (Linguistics, Cornell) "Language and the Sexes" 18. Bonnie McElhinny (Linguistics, Stanford) "Language and Gender" 19. 20. Rae Moses (Linguistics, Northwestern) "Language and Gender" 21. Mary Par lee & Ana Celia Zentella (Linguistics, Hunter College) "Language, Gender and Social Identity" 22. Craige Roberts (Linguistics, Ohio State) "Language and Gender" 23. Bambi Schieffelin (Anthropology, NYU) "Language in Everyday Life" 24. Ron Souther land (Linguistics, Univ. of Calgary) "Language and Power" 25. Deborah Tannen (Linguistics, Georgetown) "Gender Differences in Language Use" 26. Lenora Timm (Linguistics, UC-Davis) "Language, Gender and Society" 27. Ruth Wodak (Linguistics, Univ. of Vienna) "Sprachverhalten von Frau und Mann" 6 s m n n w o s i e o s n n t n i u o g o m t n i i s t t i e u c s n f c u n g d o r I i t n f s s s e a c n r d a i i s t l s c d s u e e i e t i e c s u n s t s . l r i s s r g r e i t u i u t u a r n d g u n o a o t o i u n g e e c p L c c t d i d n n s e e . e u i 1 w . h n l h f h l t 9 o t c a s t , t 9 e y n l g g ) g p s g 1 h i ) d n s n s s n ( s n a p c s e c a i e t i n i s u o h s n a i h a s i r h c S e p o e p g i g c r o r c o c t E t s o s u i g o a n ( h a c i a i r t i R t t o e o t c s e e a p c g e e s t r e c U r l t i r s l r t t u e l e l e e n a e u u n n o b u h T n a n p x p u x o q b o c o t i . q c o A o a e a n d e b a n s s . p n s a p s E i a n s l s s k a k t e t e t t l o t u r t t F n n o a r n w y r r r n r v n h g i o b o o d e e F i o e s s e L i e g s f a m w m f s m r w s e m m s u A l o n u s s s y u d m a m d m a I m r e a c m s ) c t C l u l e t e s d e o e o s o x o y e o o d E i d i a i i c c c d h e l c f c c i d f P i r * l * * * * * * * * * t * * a g * S y n u n i ( g a e i p r t o m a u s o d a I c s B a w e c r A i a g d e L r t u s s a L e c r t h d Y u S i t t n o S s l s u c i a T l F u a r e r O N g e i o h r n b E s s s s f e W t c i i c c n c M t L L t t i a i i i E o n h t t t t / / T m h s s s i I e s g . o h h h i t V o i h i R s i m u a u r s s u s u u i r c e h R A c i i i l g a g g h g t l l n s l g t u E r n t g g g P n n t r n n e n a d n u V i n n n E s i i A i r p E L L L E A L a o F E E E D O e w c d l e a f o s n r o d u i n o t i i c d k d e e a h h t s t d d t r s s a a e i e r e r h l t g g t a t S a L u e u d d d c d d u d E E h / / a a a i d a d a d d a d R d w V r r r a r r a r a a g g g n a g g U g r E r r r i u u u r s g u g u g g u L g ? T e T t A N a c E E i t F d M e n n L T i i G A R L I - E A C l y l V P n e E n n E E P n i D S L h n o l a C E m c c n M M f n f a o l l m & & n H e a w r h - s e m t e h s c d r i k i m t n r e s n e e g c a r x i k r e s e u a n a e e u o c e r r l H H H i l B B F F F E B B F n a m t e h r b g e u G l l a i w t n t o x e . e d s o r n n i u l a n s b o s c s s e n i c c s n n b i h s i i p e w o o e p w s ) o s s i i o p e o i t . t t i c o t s l s p d c h r c r e e i r r e e e l i 8 u e e u n i b t p x f x r p 3 q q o i a i e a b e a ( d p t n s p k n s e o k d t o r e n r o v m r r e o i o t e o o i s t f . s w e a m w f s o . n s o l t u o i d s p o e a d m l i c i a l b l m n t e l l e s b e x b e o i d n i i d i b a e i i c d f i a b f b s i * * * * * * * * * * * * / . / o s s s r s s c h e e e e i t i i t i i s d d n d d y i u u A u u u g t t g t t / / S S o / s S S s s s s s s s n s s s c l c c c c c c c c c o i s s c i s s i i i i i i i L i i t t t ' ' p i t t t ' ' t t t n n t e s s s n n t s s s s s s / s o h s i i i r e e o i i i i i e e i i u u u i o u u u r u u s u u m m r m m u h g g g i g g g l h g g g g l g k t n n n o o n n n g t o o n n n n n n l n i i i W W i i i n i i o W W i A i L L L i L L L A L L L L E L F ? ? d d d d d d ? d d a d a a a d a a d d a a r r a r r a r r a a g r g g r g g g r r g r g r u g u u u g u u g g a t e l l n e i t G n d e - n Z l y l a n e n & l i n n n n l s r n k f n a i e t e a e f s h e a r m h o n h m e e e e e n l t d c C o t i g E l s s m b n u h o i p l o r n r c a c o a a o c W u a a i M a l M M T M T R S S K K P H L Language and Gender in Cultural Perspective Anthropology 601b Yale University, Spring Semester 1993 seminar meetings: Th 2:30-4:20, 175 Whitney, room 24 instructor: Niko Besnier office: 51 Hillhouse, room 13 phone & e-mail: 2-3674, uttanu@yalevm office hours: W 1:30-3:30 or by appointment paper deadline: Monday, May 3, 12 noon Aims of the course In the last two decades, anthropology has undergone a major paradigm shift, as gender, a hitherto peripheral category in the discipline, has emerged as a pivotal area of anthropological inquiry. This seminar explores the role that gender plays in the "fourth subfield" of the discipline, namely linguistic anthropology. Because the fourth subfield is a continuum between anthropology and linguistics, the seminar will also touch on the ways in which linguists (particularly sociolinguists) have approached the relationship between language and gender. However, the seminar will emphasize ethnographic approaches to language and gender over approaches that are primarily concerned with language structure. We will read ethnographic accounts from a broad variety of ethnographic settings, ranging from postindustrial complex societies to small- scale communities. The seminar will first concentrate on the various theoretical frameworks through which the relationship between language and gender has been studied. This survey will suggest that the nature of this relationship is far from being understood. However, most headway in the direction of understanding has been made by theoretical approaches which centralize the way in which both language and gender are embedded in structures of power, authority, and social inequality, and are closely associated with conflicts over these structures. Indeed, linguistic practices often emerge as the very battleground of the struggle over power and inequality. Thus, in order to understand how language and gender are interwoven, we must cast our nets wide and investigate the social and cultural contexts that give meaning to both linguistic practices and gender categories. How this contextualization should be accomplished is best understood empirically. In the last part of the seminar, we will focus on a number of ethnographies that have been particularly successful in locating language and gender in social and cultural perspectives. We win focus on several aspects of linguistic and social practices in which gender has been shown to be pivotal, i:_cluding language socialization, emotionality, and literacy. The questions and problems which arise in each of these areas of concern will enable us to formulate the general theoretical concerns of relevance to the study of language and gender from an ethnographic perspective. Texts Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1986. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Goodwin, Marjorie. 1990. He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization in a Black Peer Group. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 11 Radway, Janice A. 1991. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. 2nd edition. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. All three books are required and available at Book Haven, 290 York Street, 787-2848. A supplementary packet of required readings will be available for purchase after the beginning of week 2 at Audubon Copy, 48 Whitney Avenue, 865-3115. Course requirements Research paper (70%) (a) The term paper for this seminar may be a report of original research, a critical review of the literature on a specific topic of relevance to the seminar, or a grant proposal for future research. Participants in the seminar arc strongly urged to consult with me well ahead of time about the topic of the paper. A proposal for the paper is due on February 11, and will be returned to you with comments the following week. The proposal should be as elaborate or lengthy as you think is necessary to provide me with enough information to comment on. Ideally, a working bibliography will be attached to it. The paper is expected to be of professional quality and form. Seminar presentation (20%) (b) Every participant in the seminar will make a seminar presentation based on a paper-length ethnography chosen from the list provided in the semester outline. (It is also possible for a seminar participant to present an ethnography not on this list, in which case my prior approval is needed.) This exercise has two purposes: it is an efficient way for us all to learn about the range of ethnographic work that has been conducted on topics relating to the seminar; and it is a forum in which seminar participants will be able to practice the presentation skills they will later be expected to have in pedagogical settings as professionals. In evaluating the presentations, I shall pay equal attention to content and form: thus, presentations should be well prepared, clear, and not read, and the judicious use of handouts or other pedagogical aids are strongly encouraged. General seminar participation (10%) (c) Please note that the semester is very short; thus a missed seminar meeting subtracts a significant percentage of seminar time. Readings and breakdown of topics Gender and its socio-cultural context. Sex vs. gender, gender role vs. gender identity, female vs. male, women vs. men, nature vs. culture, domestic vs. public, and the trouble with dichotomies. The place of gender in society and culture. Rubin, Gayle. 1975. The Traffic in Women: Notes On the "Political Economy" of Sex. In Toward an Anthropology of Women. Rayna R. Reiter, ed. Pp. 157-210. New York: Monthly Review Press. Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1974. Women, Culture, and Society: A Theoretical Overview. In Women, Culture, and Society. Michelle Z. Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere, eds. Pp. 14-42. Stanford, CA: Stanford 12