ebook img

DTIC ADA527913: The Plane Truth about DoD Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Consolidation PDF

47 Pages·0.11 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview DTIC ADA527913: The Plane Truth about DoD Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Consolidation

The "Plane" Truth About DoD Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Consolidation CSC 1996 Subject Area - Training EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Title: The "Plane" Truth About DoD Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Consolidation Author: Major Grant A. Webb, United States Army Thesis: The Department of Defense (DoD) could save approximately a billion American tax dollars by consolidating all DoD Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training. Discussion: The DoD operates two separate Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training (UHPT) programs: the Army Initial Entry Rotary Wing course at Fort Rucker, Alabama and the Navy UHPT program at Whiting Field, Florida. Since 1965 proposals have been made to consolidate the two programs in order to eliminate redundancy and increase DoD efficiency. For years, congress has reviewed the proposals and has voted against consolidation primarily due to the differences in the training requirements of the Army and the Navy. The primary difference in the programs is the Navy requirement to train all Navy/Marine pilots in fixed-wing aircraft prior to training in helicopters. Nearly twenty major independent studies have been conducted by the Services themselves, the DoD Inspector General, the Interservice Training Review Organization, the Government Accounting Office, and the Commission on Roles and Missions to evaluate the potential and feasibility of consolidating UHPT. With only a few exceptions, the studies and reports concluded that the Navy should discontinue training helicopter pilots in fixed- wing aircraft and supported consolidation of all UHPT. Congress has continued to vote against consolidation. This year, the DoD let a $7 billion contract to build 711 new fixed- wing training aircraft for the Air Force and the Navy: the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS). The Navy is scheduled to receive 339 JPATS of which approximately 97 will be used to train helicopter pilots. The cost of the 97 aircraft is $955 million. At the same time, the Army, which operates approximately 80% of the DoD helicopter fleet, reports that its Aviation Center at Fort Rucker is operating at approximately 70% training capacity and is capable of handling all DoD UHPT now. Additionally, the Army Aviation Center excess training capacity will continue to grow as pilot training requirements decrease. Recommendation: The DoD should reduce spending and inefficiency by reducing the JPATS purchase by the number of aircraft required to train helicopter student pilots, discontinue fixed-wing training for Navy/USMC helicopter student pilots, and consolidate all DoD UHPT at the Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker, Alabama. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 1996 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-1996 to 00-00-1996 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER The 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION United States Marine Corps,Command and Staff College, Marine Corps REPORT NUMBER Combat Development,Marine Corps University, 2076 South Street,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 46 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 CONTENTS I. Should Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Be Consolidated? 2 II. Parochialism and Politics 4 III. Decades of Political Quagmire 5 IV. Navy/USMC Curriculum 21 V. Army Curriculum 23 VI. Current Status of JPATS and NTH (TH-67) 24 VII. Issues and Resolutions 25 VIII. Conclusion 30 IX. It Can't Be Stopped 34 X. Notes 37 XI. Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations 41 XII. Bibliography 42 THE "PLANE" TRUTH ABOUT DOD UNDERGRADUATE HELICOPTER PILOT TRAINING CONSOLIDATION I. SHOULD UNDERGRADUATE HELICOPTER PILOT TRAINING BE CONSOLIDATED? Fiscal realities are forcing our government to relook the way we conduct business and it has become apparent that very few institutions are sacred. In the past couple of years this fact has shaken up the Department of Defense (DoD). The government has pursued many ways to create greater efficiencies in the DoD, and one method has been through the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) commission. The commission's mission has been to identify inefficiencies and potential for savings by closing and consolidating bases and posts around the globe. The reason for the existence of the BRAC commission and other methods of improving efficiency in the DoD is due to the decreasing defense budget, the shrinking DoD, and the ever growing national debt. By closing and realigning military installations world-wide, we could potentially save millions in the near term and billions over the out years. But the BRAC process is only one of the methods that the government is using to create greater efficiencies; the Secretary of Defense's recent Bottom Up Review and the Commission on Roles and Missions (CORM) seek greater efficiency in government. Currently, the Joint Staff is conducting a comprehensive review of roles, missions, and functions of the Services to reduce unnecessary duplication in effort to produce maximum efficiency per dollar spent on defense. A prime example of redundancy in the DoD is undergraduate fixed wing pilot training for the Air Force and Navy/USMC. Each service has operated its own undergraduate flight training program, typically with different aircraft. Currently, the Air Force and the Navy are making strides to make the training process more "joint" by procuring a common Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) that will be used to train both Air Force and Navy pilots. Another example of redundant training is the separate undergraduate helicopter pilot training (UHPT) programs operated by the Army and the Navy. Potential exists for major tax dollar savings by reducing the redundancy in the DoD training. This paper will answer the question: "should all DoD UHPT be consolidated and if so, where should the new UHPT be conducted?" Currently, American tax payers fund two separate UHPT programs in the DoD: the Army Initial Entry Rotary Wing (IERW) Course at the Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, Alabama, and the Navy UHPT program conducted at Whiting Field, Florida. The Army conducts all training for Army and Air Force helicopter pilots. The Navy conducts training for Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard helicopter pilots. DoD force structure reductions have reduced the combined services UHPT requirements. In FY 1989, the Army graduated 2,156 Army, Air Force, and international students from its UHPT program at Fort Rucker.1 In 1991, the Army UHPT graduated 1551 students, and in 1994 the number decreased to 1203.2 Similarly, the Navy UHPT program graduated approximately 550 Helicopter pilots in the same year. This year the Navy proposes to train approximately 564 undergraduate pilots (Navy, Marine, Coast Guard) and the Army proposes to train approximately 1330 pilots.3 The Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker has a capacity to train 1700 to 1900 undergraduate students annually, although during the Vietnam era the Army Aviation Center produced 2,400 graduates per year.4 In light of the training capacity and reduced student numbers, the Army Aviation Center has announced that it can accommodate all future DoD UHPT requirements. The Army contends that considerable cost savings can be realized by consolidation of UHPT through infrastructure reduction, utilization of common training equipment, and implementation of standardized training. The American public deserves the maximum efficiency in the DoD and military officials and politicians are presently seeking ways to improve the way the government operates. The proposal to consolidate UHPT could prove beneficial to the Services and the American taxpayer. This paper will review the history behind UHPT consolidation and will outline the issues involved with consolidation. It will discuss the pros and cons and future implications of consolidation. Finally, it will propose consolidation of UHPT at the Army Aviation Center. II. PAROCHIALISM AND POLITICS Consolidation of UHPT is not a new concept; the issue has been proposed and studied since the 1960's. Besides the Services themselves, the DoD Inspector General (DoDIG), the Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO), and the Government Accounting Office (GAO) have all conducted their own independent research studies to evaluate the potential and feasibility of consolidating UHPT.5 With only a few exceptions, all reports and audits concluded that it was feasible and cost-effective to consolidate all DoD UHPT programs at the Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker.6 As a result of the 1970 review, the Air Force transferred its UHPT program to Fort Rucker. There have been two primary reasons that have prevented consolidation. The first is related to the differences between the curriculums of the Navy and Army UHPT programs. Specifically, the Army UHPT consists of only helicopter training, but the Navy's curriculum requires fixed wing training for helicopter pilots prior to receiving UHPT. The second reason is porkbarrel politics. The President's budgets for the Fiscal Years (FY) 1977 through 1980 proposed consolidating all helicopter training at Fort Rucker. However, despite testimonial endorsement by the Secretary of the Navy, the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps supporting consolidation of UHPT at Fort Rucker, Congress continually voted against the budget proposals and directed continuation of the separate Army and Navy programs.7 The influence of politics on the consolidation issue cannot be understated. Both Alabama and Florida Congressional Senators and Representatives realize the potential adverse economic impact if UHPT were to leave their state or district. Consequently, regardless of what would be best for the whole, votes and deals have been cast to protect and maintain the status quo. III. DECADES OF POLITICAL QUAGMIRE The DoD first considered consolidating UHPT in 1965. GAO recommended that fixed wing training for Navy and Marine helicopter pilots be discontinued. Five years later, the House Appropriations Committee asked the Air Force and Navy to consider having the Army conduct all training for DoD helicopter pilots.8 Additionally, the committee directed the Air Force and the Navy to discontinue fixed-wing training of helicopter pilots.9 Consequently, in October 1970, the Air Force began sending their potential helicopter pilots to the Army's UHPT program. However, the Navy considered fixed wing training a critical part of the training process for students, and, therefore, the Navy did not start training at Fort Rucker. The Navy used fixed wing training in their primary phase of training, for all flight students and used the training results in the screening and selection process for follow-on training. However, during that period, the Army trained 492 Marine helicopter pilots due to the Vietnam War pilot requirement.10 Also, the Navy stated that additional helicopters were required if an all helicopter pilot training program were to be initiated and that funds were not available to make such a purchase. Again, in February 1971, a Defense staff study recommended that the Navy UHPT program be discontinued and that the Army perform all training for the DoD. Again, the Navy objected to the consolidation of UHPT for the same reasons.11 In August 1972 the Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) was established by agreement of the Deputy Chief of Staff Personnel, USA; Director, Naval Education and Training, USN; Assistant Chief of Staff, G-3, USMC; and Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, USAF. The purpose of ITRO was to review Service training programs and recommend ways of reducing cost and duplication. ITRO would conduct several audits and studies on the UHPT concept. In May 1974, the GAO conducted a study: Need To Assess Potential For Consolidating Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training, Department of Defense. GAO evaluated the potential for consolidation of UHPT in the DoD and concluded that the cost of undergraduate training could be reduced by requiring that the Navy discontinue fixed- wing training and consolidate all helicopter training at a single site. GAO recommended that the Secretary of Defense consider directing the Navy to discontinue fixed-wing training and move toward consolidating undergraduate training at one site under a joint all helicopter program. However, in December 1974, after the results of the May 1974 GAO report results were released, OP-59 (Aviation Manpower and Training Office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations) requested an opinion from the Judge Advocate General regarding consolidation of UHPT. Specifically, OP-59 wanted to know if consolidation would require an amendment of section 5012(b) of Title 10, United States Code (composition and functions of the Navy taken from the National Security Act of 1947). The Judge Advocate responded: "since the training of naval aviation personnel is a function assigned to the Department of the Navy under 10 U.S.C. 5012, it would appear that, if the Secretary of Defense were to propose that consolidation of the undergraduate pilot training programs of the military Services, a report setting forth that proposal would have to be made to the Senate and House committees."12 The Judge Advocate's response stated that UHPT consolidation would require approval by both Houses in the Congress. Then in 1975 the Office of the Secretary of Defense requested that ITRO conduct a study of UHPT consolidation. The ITRO study concluded that "significant commonality existed between the Army and Navy UHPT programs", and that significant savings would result from consolidation. However, the senior ITRO board representative did not provide any formal recommendations.13 At this time the DoD proposed to consolidate all UHPT at Fort Rucker and to close one Navy training base and the proposal was incorporated in the FY-77 President's budget. However, due to 1974 Judge Advocate's ruling on the legality of Title 10, United States Code, the proposal went before Congress. It was accepted by the House by a margin of 288 to 110, but was rejected by the Senate by a margin of 28 to 61. The House Appropriations Committee requested another study of the proposal. Program Budget Decision 317 directed the consolidation of UHPT at Fort Rucker beginning in FY 1977. The House Armed Services Committee recommended separate UHPT programs, but the House overturned the committee by approving the consolidation proposal by floor vote. However, the Senate Armed Services Committee disagreed with consolidation and the Senate backed them by rejecting the proposal. In response to the increasing call from GAO and ITRO to consolidate UHPT, in January 1977, the Navy formed a studies group to evaluate the feasibility of joint training at Fort Rucker. The studies group consisted of both Navy and USMC officers. The team visited both the Army Aviation Center at Fort Rucker and the Naval Air Training Command at Pensacola to become familiar with each UHPT program. The studies group determined that fixed-wing training was not required to produce a well qualified helicopter pilot.14 Consequently, the Secretary of the Navy, Graham Clayton, stated "we in the Department of the Navy support the proposal to consolidate helicopter training with the Army at Fort Rucker."15 Also in Janurary 1977, the DoD released another study: Report of the Department of Defense of Undergraduate Helicopter Pilot Training Consolidation, April 1977. This report was in response to the initial congressional request to study the feasibility of consolidating DoD UHPT. Once again, the report recommended that all DoD UHPT be consolidated into an all rotary-wing program to be conducted by the Army at Fort Rucker. DoD estimated that cost avoidance of $104 million for FY's 1978 through 1982 could be obtained through consolidation.16 Also, in May 1977, the GAO wrote a letter report to the Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee validating the savings calculations in the April DoD report. Again, the proposal went to vote in Congress with similar results; the House recommended consolidation, but the Senate rejected it. By July 1977, the proposal to consolidate UHPT, recommended by DoD, GAO, and ITRO, had gone to vote three times in Congress and failed each time. In March 1978, the Defense Audit Service completed another study: Report on the Review of Projected Savings from Consolidation of Helicopter Training. The auditors evaluated and reconciled the differences between the Army and the Navy projected savings from consolidation of UHPT as proposed in the April 1977 DoD report. The auditors concluded that potential net savings of $80 million to $124 million were possible for FY 1979 through 1983 from UHPT consolidation.17 In December 1978, the Secretary of the Navy announced that the Navy would consolidate UHPT at Fort Rucker.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.