2011 TUNA ŞARE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DRESS AND IDENTITY IN THE ARTS OF WESTERN ANATOLIA: THE SEVENTH THROUGH FOURTH CENTURIES BCE By TUNA ŞARE A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Art History written under the direction of Dr. John F. Kenfield III and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2011 UMI Number: 3475028 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3475028 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION DRESS AND IDENTITY IN THE ARTS OF WESTERN ANATOLIA: THE SEVENTH THROUGH FOURTH CENTURIES BCE By TUNA ŞARE Dissertation Director: Dr. John F. Kenfield III This dissertation investigates the variety of clothing options available to the ancient Western Anatolians from the seventh through the fourth centuries BCE as evidenced by archaeological remains, visual representations, and rare written sources. The body of the dissertation includes an analysis of the textile industries, a typological examination of the dress items, and three case studies of the tomb imagery in Western Anatolia. Given the lack of first hand evidence for the social history of the region, especially of its non-Greek populations, this examination reveals the important position articles of dress occupied in conveying social roles and status in Western Anatolia. Through an analysis of the ‗language of dress‘ this dissertation reaches two conclusions. First, there existed a distinctive ‗Anatolian‘ dress fashion shared among the various ethnic groups of Anatolia during the time in question. Second, the Western Anatolian elite adjusted borrowed dress fashions from the Persian court in order to show their status claims within the local socio-historical circumstances. ii Acknowledgement and Dedication My interest in classical archaeology and in the art and archaeology of ancient Anatolia goes back to my college years in Ankara. My professors in the Archaeology and History of Art Program at Bilkent University had a big influence in turning this interest into a life-long passion to pursue. The idea for the current project came after a research trip to Lycia with the members of the ASCSA under the leadership of Dr. John Camp in the spring of 2007. My first encounter with the Antalya figurines in Antalya Museum during this trip turned into a research paper, and then into an article published in the first issue of Hesperia in 2010. A different version of that article also forms the fourth chapter of this dissertation. I presented different aspects of my research on the Antalya figurines as well as the new methodological approaches to Anatolian art and archaeology in several conferences. These conferences include: the Annual Meeting of Classical Association of Canada in May 2009, the Annual Meeting of ASOR in November 2009, and the Annual Meeting of AIA in 2010. A great number of people and institutions helped me to write this dissertation. Here, I would like to record my indebtedness to them; first my advisor Dr. John Kenfield, who always encouraged me and my committee member Dr. Clemente Marconi, who always inspired me. I am especially grateful to Dr. Larissa Bonfante and Dr. Catherine Draycott for their inspirational studies and friendly advice. Dr. Nicholas Cahill, Dr. Maya Vassileva, Dr. Latife Summerer, Dr. Fahri Işık provided information and shared their work with me. Three institutions that have pivotal importance in the research and writing iii phases of this dissertation are the ASCSA, the Marquand Library at Princeton University, and the Alexander Library at Rutgers University. My fellow graduate student friends Susannah Fisher, Barbara Werther, Angela Oh, and Patrick Coleman and the most precious member of the Art History Program at Rutgers University, Geralyn Colvil were always there when I needed their help. Finally, there are the people who supported me outside of academia; my dearest brother Ersin Şare, my mum and my dad, Ayşe and Arif Şare, friends in Turkey, and friends in New Brunswick, especially Azize, Alev, Pınar, Eleni, Jin Young, Evren, Erman, Oylum, Özlem, Bahar, Banu, Aslı, Meriç, and my dear Gökçe. This dissertation is dedicated to my son, my source of life, Can Aras Ağtürk and my husband Hakan Ağtürk, without whose love and support I could not finish this project. I extend apologies to anyone who have been inadvertently overlooked in my acknowledgment. I, alone am responsible for any errors. Also, I hope that readers will not be overly disappointed for the absence of museum inventory numbers for some of the illustrations. iv Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgement and Dedication .................................................................................. iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... v List of Illustrations ............................................................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Organization .............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Historical Background .............................................................................. 5 1.3 Historiography and Methods Adapted ...................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Textile Production and Textiles (Fabrics and Patterns) ......................... 15 Chapter 3: Popular Dress Items and Their Social Significance ................................. 41 3.1 Headdresses .............................................................................................. 41 a) Polos .............................................................................................. 41 b) Griffin Crown ............................................................................... 51 c) Veil and Veiling ............................................................................ 53 d) Bashlyk ......................................................................................... 62 e) ‗Phrygian Cap‘: Myths and Facts ................................................. 77 3.2 Tunics, Overcoats, and Pants ................................................................... 79 a) Sleeved Tunics .............................................................................. 79 b) Kandys .......................................................................................... 82 c) Tight Pants (Anaxyrides) .............................................................. 89 3.3 Belts ......................................................................................................... 92 a) Urartian Type ................................................................................ 92 b) Phrygio-Ionian Type ..................................................................... 95 v Chapter 4: Dress and Identity: The Antalya Figurines- Sixth Century BCE ......... 104 Chapter 5: Dress and Identity: The Tatarlı Paintings - Fifth Century BCE .......... 136 Chapter 6: Dress and Identity: The Friezes of the Heroon of Perikle at Limyra- Fourth Century BCE ................................................................................................... 160 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 184 Curriculum Vitae ............................................................................................................ 208 Illustrations .................................................................................................................... 212 vi List of Illustrations CHAPTER 2 Fig 2.1 Zincirli funerary relief, late eight century BCE, Adana Regional Museum, inv. no.1756, after Özgen and Öztürk 1996, p. 62, fig. 143. Fig 2.2 A square golden costume appliqué from a burial at Sardis, seventh century BCE, Uşak Museum, inv. no. 1.92.96, after Özgen and Öztürk 1996, p. 166, cat. no. 117. Fig 2.3 Toprakkale Medallion, 600 BCE, Vorderasiatische Museum, after Özgen and Öztürk 1996, p. 166, fig 158. Fig 2.4 Apadana Group III-Armenians, between 522 and 465 BCE, after Schmidt 1955, pl. 29. Fig 2.5 Apadana Group VIII- Cilicians, between 522 and 465 BCE, after Schmidt 1955, pl. 34. Fig 2.6 Apadana Group IX- Cappadocians, between 522 and 465 BCE, after Schmidt 1955, pl. 35. Fig 2.7 Apadana Group XII- Ionians and Lydians, between 522 and 465 BCE, after Schmidt 1955, pl. 38. Fig 2.7a Apadana Group XII- Ionians and Lydians, detail of the textile bearers, between 522 and 465 BCE, after Schmidt 1955, pl. 38. Fig 2.8 Harta Fresco, late fifth century BCE, Uşak Museum, inv. nos. (fragments) 1.3.96, 1.4.96, 1.5.96, after Özgen and Öztürk 1996, p. 39, fig 65. vii