BLM LIBRARY 88057689 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District June 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Draft California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment for the Coachella Valley and the Draft Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan BLM/CA/ES-2002/003+1790-1600 OEPC Control No^ DES-02-21 QMium # sa it>: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office Draft California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment for the Coachella Valley Draft Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement ^^ Riverside County, California June 2002 Mike Pool, State Director - California United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office 690 West Garnet Avenue P.O. Box 581260 North Palm Springs, CA 92258-1260 Visit us on the Internetat www.ca.blm.gov/palmsprings IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610P CA660 21 ' MAY 3 C 2i Dear Reader: Enclosed for your review and comment is the Draft California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan Amendment for the Coachella Valley, Draft Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan, and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This document describes and analyzes a range of alternatives for managing the public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management in the Coachella Valley of southern California. Amongst these alternatives, the BLM's preferred alternative is identified, and a description ofthe "no-action" alternative (i.e. continuation of current management) is included. These draft plans/draft EIS may also be accessed via internet at the web address listed above. This document is being prepared in tandem with the Coachella Valley Multi-Species HabitatConservation Plan (CVMSHCP), and in collaboration with the local governments ofthe Coachella Valley, State and other Federal agencies, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and private entities. Comments received from the public shall be incorporated into the Final EIS, including names and addresses. Individual respondents may request confidentiality. If you wish to withhold your name or address from public review orfrom disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. Such requests will be honored to the extent allowed by law. All submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be made available for public inspection in their entirety. Please submit your comments in writing to the address listed in this letterhead, no later than September 5, 2002, which ends the 90-day public review period. Comments may be sent by fax at (760) 251-4899 or electronic mail to [email protected]. Your interest in collaborative stewardship of the public lands is appreciated. Sincerely, XJames G. Kenna Field Manager Draft California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment for the Coachella Valley, Draft Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan, and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Location: Riverside County, California Responsible Agency Department of the Interior : Bureau of Land Management California State Office Prepared by Department of the Interior : Bureau of Land Management Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office and Terra Nova Planning and Research 400 S. Farrell Drive, Suite 205 Palm Springs, California 92262 Nova Public Comment Period: 90 days, ending September 5, 2002 For further information contact Field Manager : Bureau of Land Management 690 W. Garnet Avenue; P.O. Box 581260 North Palm Springs, CA 92258 (760)251-4800 Abstract This draft CDCA Plan Amendment, trails management plan, and : draft EIS describes and analyzes a range of alternatives for managing the public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management in the Coachella Valley of southern California. This document is being prepared in tandem with the Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, in coordination with the local governments of the Coachella Valley, State and other Federal agencies, and private entities. Draft California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment for the Coachella Valley, Draft Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan, and Draft Environmental Impact Statement CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction ES-1 Alternatives ES-7 Environmental Consequences ES-8 The Collaborative Planning Process ES-8 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Description ofthe Coachella Valley Planning Area 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need 1-2 1.3 Issues Addressed 1-3 1.4 Alternatives Considered and Not Analyzed in Detail 1-4 1.5 Relationship to Other Plans 1-5 1.6 Planning Criteria 1-15 Chapter 2 - Alternatives 2.1 Coachella Valley California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment 2-1 2.1.1 General Description ofEach Alternative 2-2 2.1.2 Plan Goals Common to All Alternatives 2-2 2.1.3 Land Use Plan Alternatives 2-4 2.1.3.1 Wild and Scenic Rivers 2-4 2.1.3.2 Visual Resource Management 2-5 2.1.3.3 Land Health Standards 2-6 2.1.3.4 Air Quality 2-8 2.1.3.5 Multiple Use Classification 2-8 2.1.3.6 Habitat Conservation Objectives 2-9 2.1.3.7 Fire Management 2-10 2.1.3.8 Special Area Designations 2-11 2.1.3.9 Land Tenure: Exchange and Sale Criteria 2-12 2.1.3.10 Land Tenure: Acquisition Criteria 2-14 2.1.3.11 Management ofAcquired & Formerly Withdrawn Lands 2-14 2.1.3.12 Communication Sites and Utilities 2-14 2.1.3.13 Sand and Gravel Mining 2-15 2.1.3.14 Livestock Grazing 2-15 2.1.3.15 Wild Horse and Burro Program 2-16 Contents 2.1.3.16 Motorized Vehicle Area Designations 2-17 2.1.3.17 Motorized Vehicle Route Designations 2-20 2.1.3.17 Special Recreation Management Area 2-23 2.1.3.18 Recreation: Stopping, Parking and Vehicle Camping 2-24 . . 2.1.3.19 Recovery Strategy for Peninsular Ranges Bighorn Sheep 2-25 2.1.3.20 Hiking, Biking and Equestrian Trails 2-28 2.1.4 Plan Maintenance 2-29 2.1.5 Plan Implementation 2-29 .... 2.2 Santa Rosa and SanJacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan 2-31 Chapter 3 - Affected Environment 3.1 Land Use Designations 3-1 3.1.1 Existing Land Use Designations 3-1 3.1.2 Potential Areas ofCritical Environmental Concern 3-3 3.1.3 Wild and Scenic Rivers 3-7 3.1.4 Wilderness 3-9 3.1.5 Farmlands 3-12 3.1.6 Livestock Grazing 3-13 3.1.7 Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Areas 3-17 3.2 Transportation, Traffic and Circulation 3-19 3.3 Soils, Geology, Mineral and Energy Resources 3-23 3.4 Recreation 3-28 3.5 Motorized-Vehicle Access 3-31 3.6 Flooding and Hydrology 3-34 3.7 Water Resources/ Quality 3-37 3.8 Biological Resources 3-39 3.9 Cultural Resources and Native American Concerns 3-42 3.10 Air Quality 3-47 3.11 Noise 3-51 3.12 Hazardous Materials and Toxic Wastes 3-54 3.13 Visual and Scenic Resources 3-56 3.14 Utilities, Public Services and Facilities 3-58 3.15 Socio-Economic Considerations 3-61 3.16 EnvironmentalJustice and Health Risks to Children 3-64 Contents Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences 4.1 Coachella Valley California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment 4-1 . 4.1.1 Land Use Designations 4-1 4.1.1.1 Areas ofCritical Environmental Concern 4-1 4.1.1.2 Wild and Scenic Rivers 4-3 4.1.1.3 Wilderness 4-10 4.1.1.4 Farmlands 4-15 4.1.1.5 Livestock Grazing 4-15 4.1.1.6 Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Areas 4-17 . . . . 4.1.2 Transportation, Traffic and Circulation 4-18 4.1.3 Soils, Geology, Mineral and Energy Resources 4-22 4.1.4 Recreation 4-27 4.1.5 Motorized-Vehicle Access 4-36 4.1.6 Flooding and Hydrology 4-39 4.1.7 Water Resources/ Quality 4-43 4.1.8 Biological Resources 4-48 4.1.9 Cultural Resources and Native American Concerns 4-61 4.1.10 Air Quality 4-65 4.1.11 Noise 4-71 4.1.12 Hazardous Materials and Toxic Wastes 4-74 4.1.13 Visual and Scenic Resources 4-74 4.1.14 Utilities, Public Services and Facilities 4-76 4.1.15 Socio-Economic Considerations 4-80 4.1.16 EnvironmentalJustice and Health Risks to Children 4-88 4.1.17 Cumulative Impacts 4-92 .... 4.2 Santa Rosa and SanJacinto Mountains Trails Management Plan 4-97 Chapter 5 - The Collaborative Planning Process 5.1 Public Participation 5-1 5.2 Coordination with LocalJurisdictions 5-2 5.3 Consultation and Coordination with Tribal Governments 5-4 5.4 Consultation with State and Federal Agencies 5-5 5.5 Development ofTrails Management Plan Alternatives 5-6 5.6 List ofPreparers 5-7 Glossary References Contents Appendices Appendix A: Notice ofintents; Notice ofAvailability; EIS Distribution List Appendix B: Wild and Scenic Rivers Appendix C: Air Quality Appendix D: Motorized Vehicle Access Appendix E: Recreational Trail Use List ofFigures Figure 1-1 California Desert Conservation Area Planning Areas Figure 1-2 Coachella Valley Planning Area Figure 2-1 Wild and Scenic Rivers Figure 2-2 Visual Resources Management Figure 2-3a Multiple Use Classification - Preferred Alternative (B) Figure 2-3b Multiple Use Classification - No Action Alternative (D) Figure 2-4 General Habitat Types Figure 2-5 Fire Management Category Figure 2-6a Special Area Designations - Preferred Alternative (A) Figure 2-6b Special Area Designations - Alternative B Figure 2-6c Special Area Designations - Alternative C Figure 2-7 Windparks and Sand & Gravel Mining Figure 2-8 Livestock Grazing Figure 2-9 Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Areas - Preferred Alternative (B) Figure 2-10a Motorized Vehicle Area Designations - Alternative A Figure 2-1Ob Motorized Vehicle Area Designations - Preferred Alternative (B) and Special Recreation Management Area- Preferred Alternative (B) Figure 2-1 la Motorized Vehicle Route Designations - Alternative A Figure 2-1 lb Motorized Vehicle Route Designations - Preferred Alternative (B) Figure 2-1 lc Motorized Vehicle Route Designations - Alternative C Figure 2-1 Id Motorized Vehicle Route Designations - No Action Alternative (D) Figure 2-12 Trails Management Plan Figure 3-1 Existing Special Area Designations