RESEARCHARTICLE versus Coral Reef Health Indices the Biological, Ecological and Functional Diversity of Fish and Coral Assemblages in the Caribbean Sea LeopoldoDíaz-Pérez1,FabiánAlejandroRodríguez-Zaragoza1*,MarcoOrtiz2,Amílcar LevíCupul-Magaña3,JoseD.Carriquiry4,EduardoRíos-Jara1,AlmaPaolaRodríguez- Troncoso3,MaríadelCarmenGarcía-Rivas5 a11111 1 LaboratoriodeEcosistemasMarinosyAcuicultura,DepartamentodeEcología,CentroUniversitariode CienciasBiológicasyAgropecuarias,UniversidaddeGuadalajara,ZapopanJalisco,México,2 Laboratorio deModelamientodeSistemasEcológicosComplejos(LAMSEC),InstitutodeCienciasNaturalesAvH, FacultaddeCienciasdelMaryRecursosBiológicosInvestigacionesOceanológicas,FacultaddeRecursos delMar,UniversidaddeAntofagasta,Antofagasta,Chile,3 DepartamentodeCienciasBiológicas,Centrode InvestigacionesCosteras,CentroUniversitariodelaCosta,UniversidaddeGuadalajara,PuertoVallarta, Jalisco,México,4 InstitutodeInvestigacionesOceanológicas,UniversidadAutónomadeBajaCalifornia, Ensenada,BajaCalifornia,México,5 ReservadelaBiosferaBancoChinchorro-CONANP.Chetumal, OPENACCESS QuintanaRoo,México Citation:Díaz-PérezL,Rodríguez-ZaragozaFA, *[email protected] OrtizM,Cupul-MagañaAL,CarriquiryJD,Ríos-Jara E,etal.(2016)CoralReefHealthIndicesversusthe Biological,EcologicalandFunctionalDiversityofFish andCoralAssemblagesintheCaribbeanSea.PLoS Abstract ONE11(8):e0161812.doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0161812 ThisstudyevaluatedtherelationshipbetweentheindicesknownastheReefHealthIndex Editor:CarloNikeBianchi,UniversitadegliStudidi (RHI)andtwo-dimensionalCoralHealthIndex(2D-CHI)anddifferentrepresentativemet- Genova,ITALY ricsofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityoffishandcoralsin101reefsites Received:October3,2015 locatedacrosssevenzonesinthewesternCaribbeanSea.Speciesrichnessandaverage Accepted:August12,2016 taxonomicdistinctnesswereusedtoassesbiologicalestimation;whileecologicaldiversity wasevaluatedwiththeindicesofShannondiversityandPielou´sevenness,aswellasby Published:August31,2016 taxonomicdiversityanddistinctness.Functionaldiversityconsideredthenumberoffunc- Copyright:©2016Díaz-Pérezetal.Thisisanopen tionalgroups,theShannondiversityandthefunctionalPielou´sevenness.Accordingtothe accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermits RHI,57.15%ofthezoneswereclassifiedaspresentinga"poor"healthgrade,while unrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninany 42.85%werein"critical"grade.Basedonthe2D-CHI,28.5%ofthezoneswerein medium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourceare "degraded"conditionand71.5%were"verydegraded".Differencesinfishandcoraldiver- credited. sityamongsitesandzonesweredemonstratedusingpermutationalANOVAs.Differences DataAvailabilityStatement:Allrelevantdataused betweenthetwohealthindices(RHIand2D-CHI)andsomeindicesofbiological,ecological forthisworkareavailableasaSupporting andfunctionaldiversityoffishandcoralswereobserved;however,onlytheRHIshoweda Informationfile,publishedwiththismanuscriptas Excelfile. correlationbetweenthehealthgradesandthespeciesandfunctionalgrouprichnessoffish atthescaleofsites,andwiththespeciesandfunctionalgrouprichnessandShannondiver- Funding:ThisworkwassupportedbytheNational CommissionofNaturalProtectedAreas sityofthefishassemblagesatthescaleofzones.Noneofthehealthindiceswererelatedto (PROCODES2007,2008,2009,2011),Universidad themetricsanalyzedforthecoraldiversity.Ingeneral,ourstudysuggeststhattheestima- deGUadalajara(projectP3E2009-2011),University tionofhealthindicesshouldbecomplementedwithclassiccommunityindices,orshouldat ofBajaCalifornia–NationalBiodiversityCommission (projectGM006),andWorldWildlifeFund-CA (AgreementKL82).Thefundershadnoroleinstudy PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 1/19 CoralReefHealthIndices design,datacollectionandanalysis,decisionto leastincludediversityindicesoffishandcorals,inordertoimprovetheaccuracyoftheesti- publish,orpreparationofthemanuscript. matedhealthstatusofcoralreefsinthewesternCaribbeanSea. CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclared thatnocompetinginterestsexist. Introduction Coralreefshavesufferedsignificantimpactsoverrecentyearsasaresultoftheimpactof humanandnaturaldisturbancesontheirbiodiversityandecosystemfunctioning[1–3].These ecosystemsarefragileandsensitivetodisturbanceandareatgreaterriskofdegradationthan othermarinesystems[4].Inrecentdecades,arapiddeclineincoralcoveragehasbeendocu- mentedworldwide,withtotallossesof19%oflivecoralandanother15%ofthecoralcover classifiedasseriouslythreatened[5].Thissituationistheresultofsynergicfactorssuchasover- fishing,eutrophicationofseawaterbyexcessiveinputofnutrients,sedimentation,increased temperatures,oceanacidification,hurricanesandtropicalstorms,amongothers[6–11],and hasgeneratedanincreaseincoralbleachingeventsandmortalities,overgrowthoffleshy macroalgae,presenceofdiseasesandadeclineinphysiologicalprocessessuchasgrowthand calcification[12–14].Thishasdiminishedthehealthorfitnessofthecoralreefs,whichare nowconsideredtobeincrisisatagloballevel[15–16]. Asaconsequence,researchexploringstrategiesofconservation,aswellstudiesofthehealth ofcoralreefs,haveincreasedconsiderably[17–19].Todate,reefhealthhasbeenevaluateda rangeofindicesandsingleindicators,including:totallivecoralcoverandmacroalgaecover [20],richnessornumberofspecies[21,22,23],Shannondiversityindex(H’)[21,22,23],Pielou ´sevennessindex(J’)[21,22,23],Simpson´sdominanceindex(D)[24],coralmortalityindex [25],coraldamageindex(CDI)[26],reefconservationvalue[27],deteriorationindex(DI) [27],coralconditionindex(CCI)[27,28],reefconditionindex(RCI)[29].Someoftheseindi- ces,suchasthoseofreefcondition(RCI)andcoralmortality,arenowindisusebuttherestare stillinapplication. IntheCaribbeanSea,theHealthyReefsInitiative(HRI),formerlycalledtheHealthyMeso- americanReefEcosystem(HMRE),isaninternationalandinter-institutionalinitiativefocused onevaluationofreefhealth[18,30]andcollaborativeevaluationofmanagementefforts throughEco-Audits(See.www.healthyreefs.org);theydevelopedaReefHealthIndex(RHI), whichcombinesfourindicatorsforevaluation:livecoralcoverage,fleshymacroalgaecoverage, biomassofherbivorousfishandbiomassofcommercialfishinordertoconveyonesimplified measureofreefhealthtopolicymakersandthegeneralpublic.Theseindicatorsareaveraged inordertoobtainvaluesonarangefrom1to5,wherethevalueof1ischaracterizedas“Criti- cal”,valueof2as“Poor”,valueof3as“Fair”,valueof4as“Good”andvalueof5as“Very Good”[31,32].Therecent“MesoamericanReef”(MAR)evaluationsreportedanincreasein thepercentageofreefsincriticalcondition,from6%in2008to30%in2010.Inareportof 2012,thislattervaluehaddecreasedto24%andanimprovementinthehealthofthereefswas reportedin2015,sinceonly17%oftheevaluatedsiteswerestillconsideredtobeincriticalcon- ditionatthattime[33–34,35]. TheCoralHealthIndex(CHI)[36]isanotherindicatorofcoralreefhealthandhasbeen usedontheLineandHawaiianIslandsintheCentralPacificOcean,ontheEastcoastofKenya andTanzaniaintheIndianOceanandintheDutchAntillesintheCaribbeanSea[36].This indexusesthreeindicators:benthos(includingthecoveragevaluesofbothencrustingcoralline algaeandlivecoral),reeffish(totalbiomassoffish)andmicrobes(concentrationofVibrio spp.).Theseindicatorsareaveragedinordertoobtainfivehealthgradesinvaluesranging PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 2/19 CoralReefHealthIndices fromzerotoone,0.0–0.20(verydegraded),0.21–0.40(degraded),0.41–0.60(Fair),0.61–0.80 (healthy),0.81–1.0(veryhealthy).Duetotherelativenoveltyofthebacterialcomponent,there islittlepertinentinformationavailable.However,Kaufmanetal.(2011)[36]definedthetwo- dimensionalCoralHealthIndex(2D-CHI),whichwasonlyestimatedwithdatapertainingto thebenthosandfish.ThismodificationhasbeensuccessfullyusedinmanyplacesintheCarib- beanSeaandPacificandIndianOceans,indicatinghealthdifferencesbetweenprotectedand non-protectedareasandbecominganeffectiveindictorwithwhichtoevaluatedifferencesin temporalandspatialhealth[36]. Thehealthstatusofcoralreefsandothertypesofaquaticecosystemshasalsobeenevaluated fromacommunityecologyperspectivethatincorporatesattributessuchasspeciesrichness,rela- tiveabundance,speciesevenness,rarespeciesandcoralcover[37,38,39].Itconsiderschangesin speciesdiversityasanindicatorofdisturbance[40,41].Inthissense,biodiversityconservation favorsthenaturalresilienceofthecoralreefstorecoverfromdisturbanceandmaintaintheireco- systemservices[42].Structuralchangesinthereefecosystemsaffecttheirbiodiversity(e.g.abun- danceoftaxa)and,withthis,theirecosystemprocesses[43].Theseindicestypesconsiderthe proportionalabundancesoftaxa,basedondifferentaspectsofthediversity.Theycanbeofstatis- ticaltype,orinvolveinformationtheory,dominanceofspeciesandtaxonomicdiversity[41].In coralreefs,thesemetricshavebeenfocusedontheassemblagesofreeffishandcoralspecies[44– 46].Thishasrevealedthatdeclineinspeciesdiversityespeciallythatofrarespeciesisoftenasso- ciatedwithreducedcoralcoverandincreasedmacroalgae[47–50]. Animportantadvanceiscurrentlytakingplaceintheassessmentofcoralreefhealth,sup- portedmainlybycommunityattributessuchasbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity indices.Nevertheless,nostudieshavebeenconductedtodatethatevaluatetherelationship betweentheRHIand2D-CHIindicesandthoseofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityofreeffishandcoralassemblages.TheRHIand2D-CHIarecommonlyimplemented byauthorities,managersandinstitutionsinordertoevaluatethehealthandconservationof coralreefsindifferentpartsoftheworld,butthisremainstobeassessedinmanylocationsof theMesoamericanCoralReef.Theobjectiveofthisstudywasthereforetodeterminetherela- tionshipbetweentheRHIand2D-CHIandindicesofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityoftheassemblagesofreeffishandhermatypiccoralsofdifferentcoralreefsofthe westernCaribbean[45,46,48,49,51]. MaterialsandMethods Studyarea ThestudyareacoveredthecoastsofMexico,Guatemala,HondurasandNicaragua,where 101samplingsitesinsevenzoneswereevaluated.Thefirstthreeoftheaforementionedcoun- trieshaveterritoriesontheMesoamericanReefandthefourthispartofthewesternCaribbean. Thestudyzoneswere:Cancún,BancoChinchorroandXcalak(Mexico);PuntaManabique (Guatemala);CayosCochinosandMediaLuna(Honduras);andCayosMiskitos(Nicaragua) (Fig1).TheMesoamericanReefcomprisesthelargestbarrierreefinthewesternCaribbean. Thissystempresentsalargevarietyofreefstructures,notableamongwhicharefouratolls locatedataconsiderabledistancefromthecoast.Itextendsoveradistanceof~1000kmand includesthenorthernYucatánPeninsulaandtheBelize,GuatemalaandHondurascoastlines [49,52]. Fieldandlaboratorywork Ahierarchicalsamplingdesignwasconductedforeachzoneanditsrespectivesamplingsites. Samplingwasconductedwiththecooperationofdifferentgovernmentalinstitutions,non- PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 3/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig1.StudyareawithzonesofcoralreefsinthewesternCaribbean.Cancún,BancoChinchorro, Xcalak,PuntaManabique,CayosCochinosMediaLuna,CayosMiskitos. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g001 governmentalorganizations(NGOs)anduniversities,includingtheMexicanNationalCom- missionforProtectedNaturalAreas(CONANP,byitsSpanishacronym),TheNicaraguan InstituteofFishery(INPESCA,byitsSpanishacronym),WorldWildlifeFund-CentralAmer- ica(WWF-CA),CayoCochinosFoundation(Honduras),MarioDaryFoundation(Guate- mala),UniversityofGuadalajara(UDG,Mexico)andtheAutonomousUniversityofBaja California(UABC,Mexico). Atotalof507transectswereconductedbetween2007and2011.Ateachtransect,visualfish censuses(2x50m)andcharacterizationofthebenthicstructureusingvideotransects(~0.8x 50m)withaunderwatercamera(JVCEverio-HDHardDiskCamcorderandSONYHandy- camHDAVCHD,resolutionof1920x1080i)wereconductedindepthsfrom3to~30matall ofthesamplingsites(S1Fig).Thefishandbenthiccomponentswererecordedsimultaneously. Thefishcensusesdocumentedspeciesrichness,aswellassizeandabundance.Biomasswas estimatedpertransect,siteandzoneusingtheexponentialfunctionW=aLb,whereWisthe biomass(gm-2),aandbcorrespondtotheconstantsofthelength-weightrelationshipobtained fromthedatabaseFishBase1andListhelengthvalueoftheweightedaveragesize[53].Fish functionalgroupsweredeterminedbasedontheirdifferenttrophic,morphologicalandfunc- tionalcharacteristics(S1Table)[54]. Foreachvideotransect,40quadrants(~0.8x~0.6m)and13fixedpointswereexamined usingconventionalvideo-processingsoftware(CyberLinkPowerDVD13)inordertoestimate therichness,coverandfunctionalgroupsofhermatypiccorals,aswellasthecoverageoffleshy andencrustingcorallinealgae[48,55].CoralcolonieswereclassifiedusingthecriteriaofArias- PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 4/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Gonzálezetal.(2008)[45],basedonthemorphologyofthecolony(i.e.semispherical,boulder, encrusting,foliose,fleshy,branching,columnar,finger,plateandbraincorals). Dataanalysis TheRHI,developedbyHealthyReefsforHealthyPeople[31–34],wasestimatedusingfour indicators:i)livecoralcover;ii)fleshymacroalgaecover;iii)biomassofherbivorousfish (g100m-2),ofthefamiliesScaridaeandAcanthuridae;andiv)biomassofcommercialfish (g100m-2),usingonlythefamiliesLutjanidaeandSerranidae.Thesefamiliesoffishwereused becauseoftheirimportantfunctionalrolewithincoralreefs;thescaridsandacanthuridsare consideredthemostimportantgrazerswithinthereefs,sincetheyreducetheovergrowthoffle- shymacroalgae.Snappers(Lutjanidae)andserranidsareofimportantcommercialvalue,but alsoplayanimportanttrophicroleascarnivoresthatexertastrongpredatoryinfluenceinthe coralreefs.Themeanvalueofeachindicatorwasconvertedtoanordinalscale,withvaluesof1 (“critical”)to5(“verygood”),producingfivegradesofhealth(S2Table)[31–33].The2D-CHI indexdevelopedbyKaufmanetal.(2011)wasestimatedbasedonthecombinationoftwodiag- nosticparameters:benthosandfish[36].Duetothelackofpertinentdata,abacterialdiagnos- ticparameterwasnotusedinthepresentstudy[36].Thediagnosticparameterswerescaled fromavalueofzero(“verydegraded”)toone(“veryhealthy”),producingfivegradesofhealth (S3Table).Estimationofthebenthoswasobtainedusingthemeanlivecoralandencrusting corallinealgaevaluesanddividingby100.Estimationofthefishconsideredthetotalbiomass (gm-2)asafractionof500gm-2,withsubsequentaveragingofthevaluesofeachparameterin ordertoobtainthefinal2D-CHIvalue[36]. Thebiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityofthefishandcoralcomponentswasesti- mated(separately)foreachbiologicalgroupattransectscale,andmeanvalueswerethencalcu- latedatsamplingsiteandreefzonescale.Theanalysisofbiologicaldiversityconsideredspecies richness(S)andaveragetaxonomicdistinctness(Δ+)[56–58].Thetrajectorylengthswere weighted:ω=1,speciesofthesamegenus;ω=2,speciesofthesamefamilybutofadifferent genus;ω=3,speciesofthesameorderbutofadifferentfamilyandgenus;ω=4,speciesofthe sameclassbutofadifferentorder,familyandgenus[58].Ecologicaldiversitywasevaluated usingShannondiversity(H’,nats),Pielou´sevenness(J’),taxonomicdiversity(Δ)andtaxo- nomicdistinctness(Δ(cid:1))[58–59].Functionaldiversityconsideringfunctionalrichness(=num- beroffunctionalgroups)andfunctionalheterogeneitywasestimatedwithShannondiversity andfunctionalPielou´sevenness[60]. Differentstatisticalmodelswereusedtoevaluatetherelationshipbetweenthereefhealth indices(RHIand2D-CHI)andtherepresentativemetricsofbiodiversity.Multi-scaleanalyses wereappliedconsideringthebiological,ecologicalandfunctionalspatialvariationamongsites, reefzonesanddegreesofhealthoftheRHIor2D-CHIindices,throughpermutationalanalysis ofvariance(ANOVA)basedonmatricesofEuclideandistances[61].Thisnon-restricted methodwasutilizedsincethedatadidnotfulfillthecriteriaforparametricstatistics[61–62]. Thefactorsconsideredinthemodelswere:sites(randomeffect,101sites),zones(random effect,sevenzones)andgradesofhealthintheRHI(fixedeffect,threeorfourgrades)and 2D-CHI(fixedeffect,twoorthreegrades).Allofthemodelsanalyzedwerethusofmixed effectsintype. Model1wasacompletelynestedtwo-wayANOVAdesign:Y=zones +sites(zones)+ε , i j i ij whereYisthedependentvariable.Thisdesignanalyzedthespatialvariationoftherepresenta- tivemetricsoffishandcoraldiversity(Y)amongsamplingsitesandreefzones.Similarly, model2consideredanestedtwo-wayANOVA,Y=healthgrade +site(healthgrade)+ε , i j i ij whichexplainedthevariationinthebiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityamong PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 5/19 CoralReefHealthIndices differenthealthgrade(RHIand2D-CHI,separately)atthescaleofsites.Model3corresponded toanestedthree-wayANOVA,Y=healthgrade +zones(healthgrade)+sites (zones(health i j i k i grade))+ε ,whichexplainedthevariationofthemetricsofdiversityusedamongthediffer- i ijk enthealthgradeestimatedbyRHIand2D-CHIseparatelyatthescalesofsiteandzone. TherelationshipbetweenRHIand2D-CHI,withrespecttothemetricsofbiological,eco- logicalandfunctionaldiversity,wasevaluatedthroughlinearandnon-linearregressionsusing anexponentialraisedtomaximumwith2parametersfunction(Y=a(1−e−bx)),wherethe RHIand2D-CHIweretheindependentvariablesandthedifferentdiversitytypeswerethe dependentvariables.Inaddition,Pearsoncorrelationswereusedamongallofthesevariablesat thescalesofsiteandzone.Alloftheanalysesofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity, aswellasthestatisticalmodels,wereperformedusingthesoftwarePrimer6+Permanova.The linearandnon-linearregressionswereperformedusingSigmaPlot111. Results Reefhealthatthescalesofsitesandzones Reefhealthatthescaleofsites. TheRHIindexshowedthatthehealthconditionofthe coralreefsofCancúnMexicowasfairinRadioPirataandpoorinBonanza,Chitales,Cuevones, ElBajito,LaBocana,PuntaNizucandManchones(Fig2A).The2D-CHIindicatedthatthe healthgradeofElBajito,LaBocana,PuntaNizucandRadioPiratawasdegraded,whilethe remainingsiteswereverydegraded(Fig3A).AccordingtotheRHI,thesitesChancay,Colora- dos,CuevaTiburones,LaCalderaandPenélopeinthezoneofBancoChinchorrowereincriti- calconditionandonlyLaBalizapresentedapoorconditionofhealth(Fig2B).However,the 2D-CHIanalysisindicatedthatallofthesesitespresentedaverydegradedconditionofhealth (Fig3B).AccordingtotheRHIand2D-CHI,theconditionsofthesitesofthezoneofXcalak werecriticalandverydegraded,respectively(Figs2Cand3C). InthezoneofPuntaManabique,Guatemala,allofthesiteswereinacriticalcondition accordingtotheRHI(Fig2D),whilethe2D-CHIindicatedthatthesesiteswereinvery degradedcondition(Fig3D).InthezoneofCayosCochinos(Honduras),theRHIanalysis showedthatRoatanBankpresentedafairhealthgrade,whilethesitesPelicanosandLaGru- perawereinpoorconditionandMariposalesandSalamandingawereincriticalcondition(Fig 2E).Accordingtothe2D-CHI,RoatanBankwasdegraded,whiletheothersiteswerevery degraded(Fig3E).InthereefsofMediaLunainHonduras,theRHIresultsindicatedthree siteswithacriticalhealthgrade(ML1,ML3andML4),withafurthertwoclassifiedaspoor (ML2andML5)andonewithfaircondition(ML6)(Fig2F).Evaluationwiththe2D-CHI showedthatthreeofthesiteswereinaverydegradedhealthgrade(ML1,ML2andML3), whiletheotherthreesitesweredegraded(Fig3F).Finally,thesitesofCayosMiskitos,Nicara- guawereinpoorconditionaccordingtotheRHI(Fig2G),however,theresultsobtainedfrom the2D-CHIindicatedthatPorgeeReefandLamarkaReefwereinaverydegradedhealthgrade whiletherestofthesitesweredegraded(Fig3G). Reefhealthatthescaleofzones. TheRHIshowedthatMediaLuna,CayosMiskitos, CayosCochinosandCancuncoralreefpresentedapoorhealthgrade,withCancunandCayos Miskitospresentingthebesthealthofallofthesereefs.Theworstconditionswereobservedat BancoChinchorro,XcalakandPuntaManabiquepresentedacriticalhealthgrade(Fig4A). The2D-CHIindicatedadegradedconditioninMediaLuna,andCayosMiskitos,where althoughMediaLunaonceagainpresentedthebesthealthgradeofthisgroup.Incontrast, Xcalak,BancoChinchorro,CayosCochinos,CancunandPuntaManabiquepresentedanout- standingdegradedhealthgrade,withPuntaManabiquepresentingthehighestdegradation (Fig4B).Ingeneral,theRHIfoundthat57.15%ofthereefzonespresentedapoorhealthand PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 6/19 CoralReefHealthIndices PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 7/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig2.CoralreefhealthinsamplingsitesevaluatedwithRHI.a)Cancun:Bonanza(Bo),Chitales(Ci),Cuevones(Cu),El Bajito(EB),LaBocana(LB),Manchones(Ma),PuntaNizuc(PN),RadioPirata(RP);b)BancoChinchorro:Sixsitesfor Baliza(Ba1,Ba2,Ba3,Ba4,Ba5,Ba6),sixsitesforChancay(Ch1,Ch2,Ch3,Ch4,Ch5,Ch6),sixsitesforColorados(Co1, Co2,Co3,Co4,Co5,Co6),sixsitesforCuevaTiburones(CT1,CT2,CT3,CT4,CT5,CT6),sixsitesforLaCaldera(LC1, LC2,LC3,LC4,LC5,LC6),andsixsitesforPenelope(Pe1,Pe2,Pe3,Pe4,Pe5,Pe6);c)Xcalak:sixsitesforAlejandro Reefs(Al1,Al2,Al3,Al4,Al5,Al6),sixsitesforHobná(Ho1,Ho2,Ho3,Ho4,Ho5,Ho6),sixsitesforBacalarChico(Bac1, Bac2,Bac3,Bac4,Bac5,Bac6),sixsitesforPozaRica(PZ1,PZ2,PZ3,PZ4,PZ5,PZ6),andsixsitesforRioHuach(RH1, RH2,RH3,RH4,RH5,RH6);d)PuntaManabique:Piedradelabarracuda(PBA),BajodelCabo(BCA),Motaguilla(Mo);e) CayosCochinos:threesitesforPelicanos(PL1,PL2,PL3),threesitesforGrupera(Gr1,Gr2,Gr3),twositesfor Mariposales(Mr1,Mr2),twositesforSalamandinga(Sa1,Sa2),andtwositesforRoatanBank(RB1,RB2);f)MediaLuna: sixsitesforMediaLuna(ML1,ML2,ML3,ML4,ML5,ML6)andg)CayosMiskitos:LondonReef(LOR),NeeReef(NER), PorgeeReef(POR),LamarkaReef(LAR),MartinezReef(MAR),CayoMuerto(MUK).Errorbarscorrespondtostandard deviationvalue. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g002 42.85%wereincriticalcondition,butthe2D-CHIindicatedthat28.5%and71.5%ofthezones presenteddegradedandverydegradedconditions,respectively. Indicesofhealthvs.biological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity TheresultsofModel1showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesofthebiological,ecologicaland functionaldiversityoffishandcoralvariedsignificantlyamongzonesandamongthesites withineachzone(Table1).Nevertheless,nodifferenceswereobservedbetweenzonesandsites withrespecttothetaxonomicdiversity(Δ)estimatedforfishandcorals,norinthePielou´s evennessestimatedforcoralsamongzones(Table1).However,theindicesoffunctionaldiver- sitydidshowsignificantdifferencesatthescalesofzoneandsite(Table1). Model2showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesrepresentativeofthefishandcoraldiversity (separately)didnotpresentsignificantdifferencesamongthecategoriesoftheRHIand 2D-CHI,exceptfortheaveragerichnessofspeciesandfunctionalgroupsoffish.Moreover, speciesevennessdifferedsignificantlyamongthehealthgradesofbothindices.FunctionalPie- lou´sevennessalsodifferedamongthehealthgradesproducedbythe2D-CHI(Table2).The functionalShannondiversityofthehermatypiccoralsvariedsignificantlyamongthehealth gradesoftheRHIand2D-CHI,whilefunctionalPielou´sevennessonlydifferedwiththeRHI (Table2).Incontrast,theanalysesconductedamongsitesperofhealthgrade(RHI-2D-CHI) showedthatthemajorityofindicesrepresentativeofthediversityoffishandcoralsdifferedsig- nificantlyamongsites(Table2). Nosignificantdifferenceswereobservedwithrespecttothetaxonomicdiversityoffishand coralsinbothhealthindicesandnodifferenceswereobservedintheaveragecoralrichness (Table2). Model3showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityoffishandcorals(separately)didnotdiffersignificantlyamongthecategoriesofthe RHIand2D-CHI(Tables3and4),exceptforthetaxonomicdistinctnessoffishamonghealth gradesoftheRHIandfunctionalShannondiversityofcoralsinthe2D-CHI.Theanalyses amongzonesperhealthgradeoftheRHIor2D-CHIalsorevealedsignificantdifferencesin mostofthediversityindicesforfish(Table3)andcorals(Table4). Nodifferenceswerefoundinthetaxonomicdiversityoffishinbothhealthindices,orin theirtaxonomicdistinctnesswiththeRHI.Regardingthecorals,Pielou´sevennessandtaxo- nomicdiversitydidnotpresentdifferencesineitherofthetwohealthindices(Table4).Finally, atthescaleofsitesnestedperzone,mostoftheanalysisshowedsignificantdifferencesamong theindicesofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity;however,nodifferencewas detectedinthetaxonomicdiversityofthefish(Table3)orcorals(Table4). Theresultsofthelinearandnon-linearregressionsshowedthatthehealthgradesofthe 2D-CHIwerenotrelatedtothediversityindicesoffishandcorals(separately)ateitherzoneor PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 8/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig3.CoralreefhealthinsamplingsitesevaluatedwithCHI.a)Cancun:Bonanza(Bo),Chitales(Ci),Cuevones (Cu),ElBajito(EB),LaBocana(LB),Manchones(Ma),PuntaNizuc(PN),RadioPirata(RP);b)BancoChinchorro: SixsitesforBaliza(Ba1,Ba2,Ba3,Ba4,Ba5,Ba6),sixsitesforChancay(Ch1,Ch2,Ch3,Ch4,Ch5,Ch6),sixsitesfor Colorados(Co1,Co2,Co3,Co4,Co5,Co6),sixsitesforCuevaTiburones(CT1,CT2,CT3,CT4,CT5,CT6),sixsites forLaCaldera(LC1,LC2,LC3,LC4,LC5,LC6),andsixsitesforPenelope(Pe1,Pe2,Pe3,Pe4,Pe5,Pe6);c) Xcalak:sixsitesforAlejandroReefs(Al1,Al2,Al3,Al4,Al5,Al6),sixsitesforHobná(Ho1,Ho2,Ho3,Ho4,Ho5,Ho6), sixsitesforBacalarChico(Bac1,Bac2,Bac3,Bac4,Bac5,Bac6),sixsitesforPozaRica(PZ1,PZ2,PZ3,PZ4,PZ5, PZ6),andsixsitesforRioHuach(RH1,RH2,RH3,RH4,RH5,RH6);d)PuntaManabique:Piedradelabarracuda (PBA),BajodelCabo(BCA),Motaguilla(Mo);e)CayosCochinos:threesitesforPelicanos(PL1,PL2,PL3),three sitesforGrupera(Gr1,Gr2,Gr3),twositesforMariposales(Mr1,Mr2),twositesforSalamandinga(Sa1,Sa2),and twositesforRoatanBank(RB1,RB2);f)MediaLuna:sixsitesforMediaLuna(ML1,ML2,ML3,ML4,ML5,ML6)and PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 9/19 CoralReefHealthIndices g)CayosMiskitos:LondonReef(LOR),NeeReef(NER),PorgeeReef(POR),LamarkaReef(LAR),MartinezReef (MAR),CayoMuerto(MUK).Errorbarscorrespondtostandarddeviation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g003 sitescale.Incontrast,thehealthgradesoftheRHIpresentedaweakbutsignificantrelationship withspeciesrichnessandthefunctionalgroupsoffishonlyatthescaleofsite(Fig5)andzones (Fig6Aand6B),aswellaswiththeShannondiversityamongzones(Fig6C). Discussion Reefhealthindices Thisstudyrevealedverysimilarhealthprofilesatsiteandzonescalesusingbothhealthindices. However,theRHIpresentedhigherreefhealthvaluesinallzonesandsitescomparedto 2D-CHI.TheRHIanalysissuggeststhat57.15%ofthezonespresentedpoorhealth,while 42.85%wereincriticalcondition.Incontrast,the2D-CHIestimatesshowedhigherdegrada- tioninallofthestudiedsites,since28.5%wereconsideredtobedegradedand71.5%tobevery degradedhealth.Thisdiscrepancybetweenthetwoindicesistheresultofdifferencesinthe variablesconsideredforestimatingreefhealth.The2D-CHIconsidersthetotalfishbiomass,as wellasthecoverageofencrustingcorallinealgae,whiletheRHIonlyconsidersthebiomassof theherbivorousfishandspeciesofcommercialimportance,limitedtospecificfamilies,without consideringencrustingcorallinealgae.Itshouldbenoted,however,thatbothreefhealthindi- cesconsidertotallivecoralcover[32,33,36].Ingeneral,bothindicesindicatedthatMedia Luna,CayosMiskitos,andCancunwerethezonesthatpresentedthebesthealthcondition(i.e. poorstatus)andthereportsfromHealthyReefsforHealthyPeopleduringtheyears2008, 2010and2012,inthereefsofCancun,presentsimilarresultswheretheRHIwastheindexuti- lized[31–33].Itisimportanttohighlighttheabsenceofprevioushealthreportsusingtheindi- cesRHIand2D-CHIforthesitesofMediaLunaandCayosMiskitos,sincethesesitesarenot consideredpartoftheMesoamericanReef[34,36].ThezoneofBancoChinchorropresenteda “critical”healthstatusundertheRHIand“verydegraded”withthe2D-CHI,thiswasnotsimi- lartothatreportedforthesesitesintheyears2010and2012[32–33].However,bothhealth Fig4.GradeofreefhealthestimatedwiththeindicesRHIand2D-CHIineachstudyzone.a)RHIhealthgradeperzone;b)CHIhealthgradeper zone. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g004 PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 10/19
Description: