ebook img

Coral Reef Health Indices versus the Biological, Ecological and Functional Diversity of Fish and PDF

19 Pages·2016·1.25 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Coral Reef Health Indices versus the Biological, Ecological and Functional Diversity of Fish and

RESEARCHARTICLE versus Coral Reef Health Indices the Biological, Ecological and Functional Diversity of Fish and Coral Assemblages in the Caribbean Sea LeopoldoDíaz-Pérez1,FabiánAlejandroRodríguez-Zaragoza1*,MarcoOrtiz2,Amílcar LevíCupul-Magaña3,JoseD.Carriquiry4,EduardoRíos-Jara1,AlmaPaolaRodríguez- Troncoso3,MaríadelCarmenGarcía-Rivas5 a11111 1 LaboratoriodeEcosistemasMarinosyAcuicultura,DepartamentodeEcología,CentroUniversitariode CienciasBiológicasyAgropecuarias,UniversidaddeGuadalajara,ZapopanJalisco,México,2 Laboratorio deModelamientodeSistemasEcológicosComplejos(LAMSEC),InstitutodeCienciasNaturalesAvH, FacultaddeCienciasdelMaryRecursosBiológicosInvestigacionesOceanológicas,FacultaddeRecursos delMar,UniversidaddeAntofagasta,Antofagasta,Chile,3 DepartamentodeCienciasBiológicas,Centrode InvestigacionesCosteras,CentroUniversitariodelaCosta,UniversidaddeGuadalajara,PuertoVallarta, Jalisco,México,4 InstitutodeInvestigacionesOceanológicas,UniversidadAutónomadeBajaCalifornia, Ensenada,BajaCalifornia,México,5 ReservadelaBiosferaBancoChinchorro-CONANP.Chetumal, OPENACCESS QuintanaRoo,México Citation:Díaz-PérezL,Rodríguez-ZaragozaFA, *[email protected] OrtizM,Cupul-MagañaAL,CarriquiryJD,Ríos-Jara E,etal.(2016)CoralReefHealthIndicesversusthe Biological,EcologicalandFunctionalDiversityofFish andCoralAssemblagesintheCaribbeanSea.PLoS Abstract ONE11(8):e0161812.doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0161812 ThisstudyevaluatedtherelationshipbetweentheindicesknownastheReefHealthIndex Editor:CarloNikeBianchi,UniversitadegliStudidi (RHI)andtwo-dimensionalCoralHealthIndex(2D-CHI)anddifferentrepresentativemet- Genova,ITALY ricsofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityoffishandcoralsin101reefsites Received:October3,2015 locatedacrosssevenzonesinthewesternCaribbeanSea.Speciesrichnessandaverage Accepted:August12,2016 taxonomicdistinctnesswereusedtoassesbiologicalestimation;whileecologicaldiversity wasevaluatedwiththeindicesofShannondiversityandPielou´sevenness,aswellasby Published:August31,2016 taxonomicdiversityanddistinctness.Functionaldiversityconsideredthenumberoffunc- Copyright:©2016Díaz-Pérezetal.Thisisanopen tionalgroups,theShannondiversityandthefunctionalPielou´sevenness.Accordingtothe accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermits RHI,57.15%ofthezoneswereclassifiedaspresentinga"poor"healthgrade,while unrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninany 42.85%werein"critical"grade.Basedonthe2D-CHI,28.5%ofthezoneswerein medium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourceare "degraded"conditionand71.5%were"verydegraded".Differencesinfishandcoraldiver- credited. sityamongsitesandzonesweredemonstratedusingpermutationalANOVAs.Differences DataAvailabilityStatement:Allrelevantdataused betweenthetwohealthindices(RHIand2D-CHI)andsomeindicesofbiological,ecological forthisworkareavailableasaSupporting andfunctionaldiversityoffishandcoralswereobserved;however,onlytheRHIshoweda Informationfile,publishedwiththismanuscriptas Excelfile. correlationbetweenthehealthgradesandthespeciesandfunctionalgrouprichnessoffish atthescaleofsites,andwiththespeciesandfunctionalgrouprichnessandShannondiver- Funding:ThisworkwassupportedbytheNational CommissionofNaturalProtectedAreas sityofthefishassemblagesatthescaleofzones.Noneofthehealthindiceswererelatedto (PROCODES2007,2008,2009,2011),Universidad themetricsanalyzedforthecoraldiversity.Ingeneral,ourstudysuggeststhattheestima- deGUadalajara(projectP3E2009-2011),University tionofhealthindicesshouldbecomplementedwithclassiccommunityindices,orshouldat ofBajaCalifornia–NationalBiodiversityCommission (projectGM006),andWorldWildlifeFund-CA (AgreementKL82).Thefundershadnoroleinstudy PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 1/19 CoralReefHealthIndices design,datacollectionandanalysis,decisionto leastincludediversityindicesoffishandcorals,inordertoimprovetheaccuracyoftheesti- publish,orpreparationofthemanuscript. matedhealthstatusofcoralreefsinthewesternCaribbeanSea. CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclared thatnocompetinginterestsexist. Introduction Coralreefshavesufferedsignificantimpactsoverrecentyearsasaresultoftheimpactof humanandnaturaldisturbancesontheirbiodiversityandecosystemfunctioning[1–3].These ecosystemsarefragileandsensitivetodisturbanceandareatgreaterriskofdegradationthan othermarinesystems[4].Inrecentdecades,arapiddeclineincoralcoveragehasbeendocu- mentedworldwide,withtotallossesof19%oflivecoralandanother15%ofthecoralcover classifiedasseriouslythreatened[5].Thissituationistheresultofsynergicfactorssuchasover- fishing,eutrophicationofseawaterbyexcessiveinputofnutrients,sedimentation,increased temperatures,oceanacidification,hurricanesandtropicalstorms,amongothers[6–11],and hasgeneratedanincreaseincoralbleachingeventsandmortalities,overgrowthoffleshy macroalgae,presenceofdiseasesandadeclineinphysiologicalprocessessuchasgrowthand calcification[12–14].Thishasdiminishedthehealthorfitnessofthecoralreefs,whichare nowconsideredtobeincrisisatagloballevel[15–16]. Asaconsequence,researchexploringstrategiesofconservation,aswellstudiesofthehealth ofcoralreefs,haveincreasedconsiderably[17–19].Todate,reefhealthhasbeenevaluateda rangeofindicesandsingleindicators,including:totallivecoralcoverandmacroalgaecover [20],richnessornumberofspecies[21,22,23],Shannondiversityindex(H’)[21,22,23],Pielou ´sevennessindex(J’)[21,22,23],Simpson´sdominanceindex(D)[24],coralmortalityindex [25],coraldamageindex(CDI)[26],reefconservationvalue[27],deteriorationindex(DI) [27],coralconditionindex(CCI)[27,28],reefconditionindex(RCI)[29].Someoftheseindi- ces,suchasthoseofreefcondition(RCI)andcoralmortality,arenowindisusebuttherestare stillinapplication. IntheCaribbeanSea,theHealthyReefsInitiative(HRI),formerlycalledtheHealthyMeso- americanReefEcosystem(HMRE),isaninternationalandinter-institutionalinitiativefocused onevaluationofreefhealth[18,30]andcollaborativeevaluationofmanagementefforts throughEco-Audits(See.www.healthyreefs.org);theydevelopedaReefHealthIndex(RHI), whichcombinesfourindicatorsforevaluation:livecoralcoverage,fleshymacroalgaecoverage, biomassofherbivorousfishandbiomassofcommercialfishinordertoconveyonesimplified measureofreefhealthtopolicymakersandthegeneralpublic.Theseindicatorsareaveraged inordertoobtainvaluesonarangefrom1to5,wherethevalueof1ischaracterizedas“Criti- cal”,valueof2as“Poor”,valueof3as“Fair”,valueof4as“Good”andvalueof5as“Very Good”[31,32].Therecent“MesoamericanReef”(MAR)evaluationsreportedanincreasein thepercentageofreefsincriticalcondition,from6%in2008to30%in2010.Inareportof 2012,thislattervaluehaddecreasedto24%andanimprovementinthehealthofthereefswas reportedin2015,sinceonly17%oftheevaluatedsiteswerestillconsideredtobeincriticalcon- ditionatthattime[33–34,35]. TheCoralHealthIndex(CHI)[36]isanotherindicatorofcoralreefhealthandhasbeen usedontheLineandHawaiianIslandsintheCentralPacificOcean,ontheEastcoastofKenya andTanzaniaintheIndianOceanandintheDutchAntillesintheCaribbeanSea[36].This indexusesthreeindicators:benthos(includingthecoveragevaluesofbothencrustingcoralline algaeandlivecoral),reeffish(totalbiomassoffish)andmicrobes(concentrationofVibrio spp.).Theseindicatorsareaveragedinordertoobtainfivehealthgradesinvaluesranging PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 2/19 CoralReefHealthIndices fromzerotoone,0.0–0.20(verydegraded),0.21–0.40(degraded),0.41–0.60(Fair),0.61–0.80 (healthy),0.81–1.0(veryhealthy).Duetotherelativenoveltyofthebacterialcomponent,there islittlepertinentinformationavailable.However,Kaufmanetal.(2011)[36]definedthetwo- dimensionalCoralHealthIndex(2D-CHI),whichwasonlyestimatedwithdatapertainingto thebenthosandfish.ThismodificationhasbeensuccessfullyusedinmanyplacesintheCarib- beanSeaandPacificandIndianOceans,indicatinghealthdifferencesbetweenprotectedand non-protectedareasandbecominganeffectiveindictorwithwhichtoevaluatedifferencesin temporalandspatialhealth[36]. Thehealthstatusofcoralreefsandothertypesofaquaticecosystemshasalsobeenevaluated fromacommunityecologyperspectivethatincorporatesattributessuchasspeciesrichness,rela- tiveabundance,speciesevenness,rarespeciesandcoralcover[37,38,39].Itconsiderschangesin speciesdiversityasanindicatorofdisturbance[40,41].Inthissense,biodiversityconservation favorsthenaturalresilienceofthecoralreefstorecoverfromdisturbanceandmaintaintheireco- systemservices[42].Structuralchangesinthereefecosystemsaffecttheirbiodiversity(e.g.abun- danceoftaxa)and,withthis,theirecosystemprocesses[43].Theseindicestypesconsiderthe proportionalabundancesoftaxa,basedondifferentaspectsofthediversity.Theycanbeofstatis- ticaltype,orinvolveinformationtheory,dominanceofspeciesandtaxonomicdiversity[41].In coralreefs,thesemetricshavebeenfocusedontheassemblagesofreeffishandcoralspecies[44– 46].Thishasrevealedthatdeclineinspeciesdiversityespeciallythatofrarespeciesisoftenasso- ciatedwithreducedcoralcoverandincreasedmacroalgae[47–50]. Animportantadvanceiscurrentlytakingplaceintheassessmentofcoralreefhealth,sup- portedmainlybycommunityattributessuchasbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity indices.Nevertheless,nostudieshavebeenconductedtodatethatevaluatetherelationship betweentheRHIand2D-CHIindicesandthoseofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityofreeffishandcoralassemblages.TheRHIand2D-CHIarecommonlyimplemented byauthorities,managersandinstitutionsinordertoevaluatethehealthandconservationof coralreefsindifferentpartsoftheworld,butthisremainstobeassessedinmanylocationsof theMesoamericanCoralReef.Theobjectiveofthisstudywasthereforetodeterminetherela- tionshipbetweentheRHIand2D-CHIandindicesofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityoftheassemblagesofreeffishandhermatypiccoralsofdifferentcoralreefsofthe westernCaribbean[45,46,48,49,51]. MaterialsandMethods Studyarea ThestudyareacoveredthecoastsofMexico,Guatemala,HondurasandNicaragua,where 101samplingsitesinsevenzoneswereevaluated.Thefirstthreeoftheaforementionedcoun- trieshaveterritoriesontheMesoamericanReefandthefourthispartofthewesternCaribbean. Thestudyzoneswere:Cancún,BancoChinchorroandXcalak(Mexico);PuntaManabique (Guatemala);CayosCochinosandMediaLuna(Honduras);andCayosMiskitos(Nicaragua) (Fig1).TheMesoamericanReefcomprisesthelargestbarrierreefinthewesternCaribbean. Thissystempresentsalargevarietyofreefstructures,notableamongwhicharefouratolls locatedataconsiderabledistancefromthecoast.Itextendsoveradistanceof~1000kmand includesthenorthernYucatánPeninsulaandtheBelize,GuatemalaandHondurascoastlines [49,52]. Fieldandlaboratorywork Ahierarchicalsamplingdesignwasconductedforeachzoneanditsrespectivesamplingsites. Samplingwasconductedwiththecooperationofdifferentgovernmentalinstitutions,non- PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 3/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig1.StudyareawithzonesofcoralreefsinthewesternCaribbean.Cancún,BancoChinchorro, Xcalak,PuntaManabique,CayosCochinosMediaLuna,CayosMiskitos. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g001 governmentalorganizations(NGOs)anduniversities,includingtheMexicanNationalCom- missionforProtectedNaturalAreas(CONANP,byitsSpanishacronym),TheNicaraguan InstituteofFishery(INPESCA,byitsSpanishacronym),WorldWildlifeFund-CentralAmer- ica(WWF-CA),CayoCochinosFoundation(Honduras),MarioDaryFoundation(Guate- mala),UniversityofGuadalajara(UDG,Mexico)andtheAutonomousUniversityofBaja California(UABC,Mexico). Atotalof507transectswereconductedbetween2007and2011.Ateachtransect,visualfish censuses(2x50m)andcharacterizationofthebenthicstructureusingvideotransects(~0.8x 50m)withaunderwatercamera(JVCEverio-HDHardDiskCamcorderandSONYHandy- camHDAVCHD,resolutionof1920x1080i)wereconductedindepthsfrom3to~30matall ofthesamplingsites(S1Fig).Thefishandbenthiccomponentswererecordedsimultaneously. Thefishcensusesdocumentedspeciesrichness,aswellassizeandabundance.Biomasswas estimatedpertransect,siteandzoneusingtheexponentialfunctionW=aLb,whereWisthe biomass(gm-2),aandbcorrespondtotheconstantsofthelength-weightrelationshipobtained fromthedatabaseFishBase1andListhelengthvalueoftheweightedaveragesize[53].Fish functionalgroupsweredeterminedbasedontheirdifferenttrophic,morphologicalandfunc- tionalcharacteristics(S1Table)[54]. Foreachvideotransect,40quadrants(~0.8x~0.6m)and13fixedpointswereexamined usingconventionalvideo-processingsoftware(CyberLinkPowerDVD13)inordertoestimate therichness,coverandfunctionalgroupsofhermatypiccorals,aswellasthecoverageoffleshy andencrustingcorallinealgae[48,55].CoralcolonieswereclassifiedusingthecriteriaofArias- PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 4/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Gonzálezetal.(2008)[45],basedonthemorphologyofthecolony(i.e.semispherical,boulder, encrusting,foliose,fleshy,branching,columnar,finger,plateandbraincorals). Dataanalysis TheRHI,developedbyHealthyReefsforHealthyPeople[31–34],wasestimatedusingfour indicators:i)livecoralcover;ii)fleshymacroalgaecover;iii)biomassofherbivorousfish (g100m-2),ofthefamiliesScaridaeandAcanthuridae;andiv)biomassofcommercialfish (g100m-2),usingonlythefamiliesLutjanidaeandSerranidae.Thesefamiliesoffishwereused becauseoftheirimportantfunctionalrolewithincoralreefs;thescaridsandacanthuridsare consideredthemostimportantgrazerswithinthereefs,sincetheyreducetheovergrowthoffle- shymacroalgae.Snappers(Lutjanidae)andserranidsareofimportantcommercialvalue,but alsoplayanimportanttrophicroleascarnivoresthatexertastrongpredatoryinfluenceinthe coralreefs.Themeanvalueofeachindicatorwasconvertedtoanordinalscale,withvaluesof1 (“critical”)to5(“verygood”),producingfivegradesofhealth(S2Table)[31–33].The2D-CHI indexdevelopedbyKaufmanetal.(2011)wasestimatedbasedonthecombinationoftwodiag- nosticparameters:benthosandfish[36].Duetothelackofpertinentdata,abacterialdiagnos- ticparameterwasnotusedinthepresentstudy[36].Thediagnosticparameterswerescaled fromavalueofzero(“verydegraded”)toone(“veryhealthy”),producingfivegradesofhealth (S3Table).Estimationofthebenthoswasobtainedusingthemeanlivecoralandencrusting corallinealgaevaluesanddividingby100.Estimationofthefishconsideredthetotalbiomass (gm-2)asafractionof500gm-2,withsubsequentaveragingofthevaluesofeachparameterin ordertoobtainthefinal2D-CHIvalue[36]. Thebiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityofthefishandcoralcomponentswasesti- mated(separately)foreachbiologicalgroupattransectscale,andmeanvalueswerethencalcu- latedatsamplingsiteandreefzonescale.Theanalysisofbiologicaldiversityconsideredspecies richness(S)andaveragetaxonomicdistinctness(Δ+)[56–58].Thetrajectorylengthswere weighted:ω=1,speciesofthesamegenus;ω=2,speciesofthesamefamilybutofadifferent genus;ω=3,speciesofthesameorderbutofadifferentfamilyandgenus;ω=4,speciesofthe sameclassbutofadifferentorder,familyandgenus[58].Ecologicaldiversitywasevaluated usingShannondiversity(H’,nats),Pielou´sevenness(J’),taxonomicdiversity(Δ)andtaxo- nomicdistinctness(Δ(cid:1))[58–59].Functionaldiversityconsideringfunctionalrichness(=num- beroffunctionalgroups)andfunctionalheterogeneitywasestimatedwithShannondiversity andfunctionalPielou´sevenness[60]. Differentstatisticalmodelswereusedtoevaluatetherelationshipbetweenthereefhealth indices(RHIand2D-CHI)andtherepresentativemetricsofbiodiversity.Multi-scaleanalyses wereappliedconsideringthebiological,ecologicalandfunctionalspatialvariationamongsites, reefzonesanddegreesofhealthoftheRHIor2D-CHIindices,throughpermutationalanalysis ofvariance(ANOVA)basedonmatricesofEuclideandistances[61].Thisnon-restricted methodwasutilizedsincethedatadidnotfulfillthecriteriaforparametricstatistics[61–62]. Thefactorsconsideredinthemodelswere:sites(randomeffect,101sites),zones(random effect,sevenzones)andgradesofhealthintheRHI(fixedeffect,threeorfourgrades)and 2D-CHI(fixedeffect,twoorthreegrades).Allofthemodelsanalyzedwerethusofmixed effectsintype. Model1wasacompletelynestedtwo-wayANOVAdesign:Y=zones +sites(zones)+ε , i j i ij whereYisthedependentvariable.Thisdesignanalyzedthespatialvariationoftherepresenta- tivemetricsoffishandcoraldiversity(Y)amongsamplingsitesandreefzones.Similarly, model2consideredanestedtwo-wayANOVA,Y=healthgrade +site(healthgrade)+ε , i j i ij whichexplainedthevariationinthebiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversityamong PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 5/19 CoralReefHealthIndices differenthealthgrade(RHIand2D-CHI,separately)atthescaleofsites.Model3corresponded toanestedthree-wayANOVA,Y=healthgrade +zones(healthgrade)+sites (zones(health i j i k i grade))+ε ,whichexplainedthevariationofthemetricsofdiversityusedamongthediffer- i ijk enthealthgradeestimatedbyRHIand2D-CHIseparatelyatthescalesofsiteandzone. TherelationshipbetweenRHIand2D-CHI,withrespecttothemetricsofbiological,eco- logicalandfunctionaldiversity,wasevaluatedthroughlinearandnon-linearregressionsusing anexponentialraisedtomaximumwith2parametersfunction(Y=a(1−e−bx)),wherethe RHIand2D-CHIweretheindependentvariablesandthedifferentdiversitytypeswerethe dependentvariables.Inaddition,Pearsoncorrelationswereusedamongallofthesevariablesat thescalesofsiteandzone.Alloftheanalysesofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity, aswellasthestatisticalmodels,wereperformedusingthesoftwarePrimer6+Permanova.The linearandnon-linearregressionswereperformedusingSigmaPlot111. Results Reefhealthatthescalesofsitesandzones Reefhealthatthescaleofsites. TheRHIindexshowedthatthehealthconditionofthe coralreefsofCancúnMexicowasfairinRadioPirataandpoorinBonanza,Chitales,Cuevones, ElBajito,LaBocana,PuntaNizucandManchones(Fig2A).The2D-CHIindicatedthatthe healthgradeofElBajito,LaBocana,PuntaNizucandRadioPiratawasdegraded,whilethe remainingsiteswereverydegraded(Fig3A).AccordingtotheRHI,thesitesChancay,Colora- dos,CuevaTiburones,LaCalderaandPenélopeinthezoneofBancoChinchorrowereincriti- calconditionandonlyLaBalizapresentedapoorconditionofhealth(Fig2B).However,the 2D-CHIanalysisindicatedthatallofthesesitespresentedaverydegradedconditionofhealth (Fig3B).AccordingtotheRHIand2D-CHI,theconditionsofthesitesofthezoneofXcalak werecriticalandverydegraded,respectively(Figs2Cand3C). InthezoneofPuntaManabique,Guatemala,allofthesiteswereinacriticalcondition accordingtotheRHI(Fig2D),whilethe2D-CHIindicatedthatthesesiteswereinvery degradedcondition(Fig3D).InthezoneofCayosCochinos(Honduras),theRHIanalysis showedthatRoatanBankpresentedafairhealthgrade,whilethesitesPelicanosandLaGru- perawereinpoorconditionandMariposalesandSalamandingawereincriticalcondition(Fig 2E).Accordingtothe2D-CHI,RoatanBankwasdegraded,whiletheothersiteswerevery degraded(Fig3E).InthereefsofMediaLunainHonduras,theRHIresultsindicatedthree siteswithacriticalhealthgrade(ML1,ML3andML4),withafurthertwoclassifiedaspoor (ML2andML5)andonewithfaircondition(ML6)(Fig2F).Evaluationwiththe2D-CHI showedthatthreeofthesiteswereinaverydegradedhealthgrade(ML1,ML2andML3), whiletheotherthreesitesweredegraded(Fig3F).Finally,thesitesofCayosMiskitos,Nicara- guawereinpoorconditionaccordingtotheRHI(Fig2G),however,theresultsobtainedfrom the2D-CHIindicatedthatPorgeeReefandLamarkaReefwereinaverydegradedhealthgrade whiletherestofthesitesweredegraded(Fig3G). Reefhealthatthescaleofzones. TheRHIshowedthatMediaLuna,CayosMiskitos, CayosCochinosandCancuncoralreefpresentedapoorhealthgrade,withCancunandCayos Miskitospresentingthebesthealthofallofthesereefs.Theworstconditionswereobservedat BancoChinchorro,XcalakandPuntaManabiquepresentedacriticalhealthgrade(Fig4A). The2D-CHIindicatedadegradedconditioninMediaLuna,andCayosMiskitos,where althoughMediaLunaonceagainpresentedthebesthealthgradeofthisgroup.Incontrast, Xcalak,BancoChinchorro,CayosCochinos,CancunandPuntaManabiquepresentedanout- standingdegradedhealthgrade,withPuntaManabiquepresentingthehighestdegradation (Fig4B).Ingeneral,theRHIfoundthat57.15%ofthereefzonespresentedapoorhealthand PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 6/19 CoralReefHealthIndices PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 7/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig2.CoralreefhealthinsamplingsitesevaluatedwithRHI.a)Cancun:Bonanza(Bo),Chitales(Ci),Cuevones(Cu),El Bajito(EB),LaBocana(LB),Manchones(Ma),PuntaNizuc(PN),RadioPirata(RP);b)BancoChinchorro:Sixsitesfor Baliza(Ba1,Ba2,Ba3,Ba4,Ba5,Ba6),sixsitesforChancay(Ch1,Ch2,Ch3,Ch4,Ch5,Ch6),sixsitesforColorados(Co1, Co2,Co3,Co4,Co5,Co6),sixsitesforCuevaTiburones(CT1,CT2,CT3,CT4,CT5,CT6),sixsitesforLaCaldera(LC1, LC2,LC3,LC4,LC5,LC6),andsixsitesforPenelope(Pe1,Pe2,Pe3,Pe4,Pe5,Pe6);c)Xcalak:sixsitesforAlejandro Reefs(Al1,Al2,Al3,Al4,Al5,Al6),sixsitesforHobná(Ho1,Ho2,Ho3,Ho4,Ho5,Ho6),sixsitesforBacalarChico(Bac1, Bac2,Bac3,Bac4,Bac5,Bac6),sixsitesforPozaRica(PZ1,PZ2,PZ3,PZ4,PZ5,PZ6),andsixsitesforRioHuach(RH1, RH2,RH3,RH4,RH5,RH6);d)PuntaManabique:Piedradelabarracuda(PBA),BajodelCabo(BCA),Motaguilla(Mo);e) CayosCochinos:threesitesforPelicanos(PL1,PL2,PL3),threesitesforGrupera(Gr1,Gr2,Gr3),twositesfor Mariposales(Mr1,Mr2),twositesforSalamandinga(Sa1,Sa2),andtwositesforRoatanBank(RB1,RB2);f)MediaLuna: sixsitesforMediaLuna(ML1,ML2,ML3,ML4,ML5,ML6)andg)CayosMiskitos:LondonReef(LOR),NeeReef(NER), PorgeeReef(POR),LamarkaReef(LAR),MartinezReef(MAR),CayoMuerto(MUK).Errorbarscorrespondtostandard deviationvalue. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g002 42.85%wereincriticalcondition,butthe2D-CHIindicatedthat28.5%and71.5%ofthezones presenteddegradedandverydegradedconditions,respectively. Indicesofhealthvs.biological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity TheresultsofModel1showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesofthebiological,ecologicaland functionaldiversityoffishandcoralvariedsignificantlyamongzonesandamongthesites withineachzone(Table1).Nevertheless,nodifferenceswereobservedbetweenzonesandsites withrespecttothetaxonomicdiversity(Δ)estimatedforfishandcorals,norinthePielou´s evennessestimatedforcoralsamongzones(Table1).However,theindicesoffunctionaldiver- sitydidshowsignificantdifferencesatthescalesofzoneandsite(Table1). Model2showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesrepresentativeofthefishandcoraldiversity (separately)didnotpresentsignificantdifferencesamongthecategoriesoftheRHIand 2D-CHI,exceptfortheaveragerichnessofspeciesandfunctionalgroupsoffish.Moreover, speciesevennessdifferedsignificantlyamongthehealthgradesofbothindices.FunctionalPie- lou´sevennessalsodifferedamongthehealthgradesproducedbythe2D-CHI(Table2).The functionalShannondiversityofthehermatypiccoralsvariedsignificantlyamongthehealth gradesoftheRHIand2D-CHI,whilefunctionalPielou´sevennessonlydifferedwiththeRHI (Table2).Incontrast,theanalysesconductedamongsitesperofhealthgrade(RHI-2D-CHI) showedthatthemajorityofindicesrepresentativeofthediversityoffishandcoralsdifferedsig- nificantlyamongsites(Table2). Nosignificantdifferenceswereobservedwithrespecttothetaxonomicdiversityoffishand coralsinbothhealthindicesandnodifferenceswereobservedintheaveragecoralrichness (Table2). Model3showedthatthemajorityoftheindicesofthebiological,ecologicalandfunctional diversityoffishandcorals(separately)didnotdiffersignificantlyamongthecategoriesofthe RHIand2D-CHI(Tables3and4),exceptforthetaxonomicdistinctnessoffishamonghealth gradesoftheRHIandfunctionalShannondiversityofcoralsinthe2D-CHI.Theanalyses amongzonesperhealthgradeoftheRHIor2D-CHIalsorevealedsignificantdifferencesin mostofthediversityindicesforfish(Table3)andcorals(Table4). Nodifferenceswerefoundinthetaxonomicdiversityoffishinbothhealthindices,orin theirtaxonomicdistinctnesswiththeRHI.Regardingthecorals,Pielou´sevennessandtaxo- nomicdiversitydidnotpresentdifferencesineitherofthetwohealthindices(Table4).Finally, atthescaleofsitesnestedperzone,mostoftheanalysisshowedsignificantdifferencesamong theindicesofbiological,ecologicalandfunctionaldiversity;however,nodifferencewas detectedinthetaxonomicdiversityofthefish(Table3)orcorals(Table4). Theresultsofthelinearandnon-linearregressionsshowedthatthehealthgradesofthe 2D-CHIwerenotrelatedtothediversityindicesoffishandcorals(separately)ateitherzoneor PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 8/19 CoralReefHealthIndices Fig3.CoralreefhealthinsamplingsitesevaluatedwithCHI.a)Cancun:Bonanza(Bo),Chitales(Ci),Cuevones (Cu),ElBajito(EB),LaBocana(LB),Manchones(Ma),PuntaNizuc(PN),RadioPirata(RP);b)BancoChinchorro: SixsitesforBaliza(Ba1,Ba2,Ba3,Ba4,Ba5,Ba6),sixsitesforChancay(Ch1,Ch2,Ch3,Ch4,Ch5,Ch6),sixsitesfor Colorados(Co1,Co2,Co3,Co4,Co5,Co6),sixsitesforCuevaTiburones(CT1,CT2,CT3,CT4,CT5,CT6),sixsites forLaCaldera(LC1,LC2,LC3,LC4,LC5,LC6),andsixsitesforPenelope(Pe1,Pe2,Pe3,Pe4,Pe5,Pe6);c) Xcalak:sixsitesforAlejandroReefs(Al1,Al2,Al3,Al4,Al5,Al6),sixsitesforHobná(Ho1,Ho2,Ho3,Ho4,Ho5,Ho6), sixsitesforBacalarChico(Bac1,Bac2,Bac3,Bac4,Bac5,Bac6),sixsitesforPozaRica(PZ1,PZ2,PZ3,PZ4,PZ5, PZ6),andsixsitesforRioHuach(RH1,RH2,RH3,RH4,RH5,RH6);d)PuntaManabique:Piedradelabarracuda (PBA),BajodelCabo(BCA),Motaguilla(Mo);e)CayosCochinos:threesitesforPelicanos(PL1,PL2,PL3),three sitesforGrupera(Gr1,Gr2,Gr3),twositesforMariposales(Mr1,Mr2),twositesforSalamandinga(Sa1,Sa2),and twositesforRoatanBank(RB1,RB2);f)MediaLuna:sixsitesforMediaLuna(ML1,ML2,ML3,ML4,ML5,ML6)and PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 9/19 CoralReefHealthIndices g)CayosMiskitos:LondonReef(LOR),NeeReef(NER),PorgeeReef(POR),LamarkaReef(LAR),MartinezReef (MAR),CayoMuerto(MUK).Errorbarscorrespondtostandarddeviation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g003 sitescale.Incontrast,thehealthgradesoftheRHIpresentedaweakbutsignificantrelationship withspeciesrichnessandthefunctionalgroupsoffishonlyatthescaleofsite(Fig5)andzones (Fig6Aand6B),aswellaswiththeShannondiversityamongzones(Fig6C). Discussion Reefhealthindices Thisstudyrevealedverysimilarhealthprofilesatsiteandzonescalesusingbothhealthindices. However,theRHIpresentedhigherreefhealthvaluesinallzonesandsitescomparedto 2D-CHI.TheRHIanalysissuggeststhat57.15%ofthezonespresentedpoorhealth,while 42.85%wereincriticalcondition.Incontrast,the2D-CHIestimatesshowedhigherdegrada- tioninallofthestudiedsites,since28.5%wereconsideredtobedegradedand71.5%tobevery degradedhealth.Thisdiscrepancybetweenthetwoindicesistheresultofdifferencesinthe variablesconsideredforestimatingreefhealth.The2D-CHIconsidersthetotalfishbiomass,as wellasthecoverageofencrustingcorallinealgae,whiletheRHIonlyconsidersthebiomassof theherbivorousfishandspeciesofcommercialimportance,limitedtospecificfamilies,without consideringencrustingcorallinealgae.Itshouldbenoted,however,thatbothreefhealthindi- cesconsidertotallivecoralcover[32,33,36].Ingeneral,bothindicesindicatedthatMedia Luna,CayosMiskitos,andCancunwerethezonesthatpresentedthebesthealthcondition(i.e. poorstatus)andthereportsfromHealthyReefsforHealthyPeopleduringtheyears2008, 2010and2012,inthereefsofCancun,presentsimilarresultswheretheRHIwastheindexuti- lized[31–33].Itisimportanttohighlighttheabsenceofprevioushealthreportsusingtheindi- cesRHIand2D-CHIforthesitesofMediaLunaandCayosMiskitos,sincethesesitesarenot consideredpartoftheMesoamericanReef[34,36].ThezoneofBancoChinchorropresenteda “critical”healthstatusundertheRHIand“verydegraded”withthe2D-CHI,thiswasnotsimi- lartothatreportedforthesesitesintheyears2010and2012[32–33].However,bothhealth Fig4.GradeofreefhealthestimatedwiththeindicesRHIand2D-CHIineachstudyzone.a)RHIhealthgradeperzone;b)CHIhealthgradeper zone. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812.g004 PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161812 August31,2016 10/19

Description:
and functional diversity of fish and corals were observed; however, only the RHI showed a correlation between the health . The Coral Health Index (CHI) [36] is another indicator of coral reef health and has been used on the Line and Hawaiian changing health of coral reefs. Hum Ecol Risk Assess.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.