ebook img

China, the EU and International Investment Law: Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement PDF

269 Pages·2020·2.6 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview China, the EU and International Investment Law: Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement

China, the EU and International Investment Law This book provides an original and critical analysis of the most contentious subjects being negotiated in the China–EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). It focuses on the pathway of reforming investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) from both Chinese and European perspectives in the context of the China–EU CAI and beyond. The book is divided into three parts. Part I examines key and controversial issues of the China–EU CAI negotiations, including market access, sustainable development and human rights, as well as comparing distinct features between the China–EU CAI and the China–US BIT. Part II concentrates on the institutional reform of investor-state arbitration with an extensive analysis of the EU’s approach to replacing the private nature of investment arbitration with the public nature of an investment court. Part III addresses the core substantive and pro- cedural issues concerning ISDS, such as the role of domestic courts in investment dispute settlement, the status of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) as investors, transparency and the protection of victims in investment dispute resolution. This book will be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the field of international investment and trade law, particularly investment dispute settlement. Yuwen Li is a professor of Chinese law and the director of the Erasmus China Law Centre at the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Tong Qi is a professor of international economic law and the director of the Centre of Overseas Investment Law at the Law School of Wuhan University, China. Cheng Bian is a researcher at the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The Rule of Law in China and Comparative Perspectives Series Editors: Yuwen Li, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands and Fu Hualing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong There is no doctrine more effective than the rule of law in portraying the complex transfor- mation of Chinese society from the rule of men towards the rule of law – a process inaugu- rated in post-Mao China which is continuing to advance legal reforms to the present day. In other parts of the world, striving for the rule of law is also evident: countries in transition face a similar mission, while the developed democratic countries are forced to tackle new challenges in retaining the high benchmark of the rule of law that has been established. Research on the legal system in China and in comparison with other countries in the frame- work of the rule of law covers broad topics of public and private law, substantive law and pro- cedural law, citizens’ rights and law enforcement by courts. Based on this broad understanding of the rule of law, the series presents international scholarly work on modern Chinese law, including comparative perspectives, interdisciplinary approaches, and empirical studies. For a full list of titles in this series, please visit: https://www.routledge.com/law/series/ CHINARULEOFLAW China, the EU and International Investment Law Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement Edited by Yuwen Li, Tong Qi and Cheng Bian First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2020 selection and editorial matter, Yuwen Li, Tong Qi and Cheng Bian; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Yuwen Li, Tong Qi and Cheng Bian to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Li, Yuwen, 1962-editor. | Qi, Tong, 1972-editor. | Bian, Cheng (Legal researcher), editor. Title: China, the EU and international investment law: reforming investor-state dispute settlement / Yuwen Li, Tong Qi, Cheng Bian. Description: Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2010. | Series: The rule of law in china and comparative perspectives | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019031342 | ISBN 9780367338466 (hardback) | ISBN 9780429322334 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Investments, Foreign–Law and legislation–China. | Investments, Foreign–Law and legislation–European Union countries. | Investments, Foreign (International law) | China–Foreign economic relations–European Union countries. | European Union countries–Foreign economic relations–China. Classification: LCC K3830.C486 2020 | DDC 346.24/092–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019031342 ISBN: 978-0-367-33846-6 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-32233-4 (ebk) Typeset in Galliard by Deanta Global Publishing Services, Chennai, India Contents Contributors vii Foreword by Wenhua Shan xiii Foreword by Julien Chaisse xv Acknowledgements xvi Abbreviations xviii 1 Introduction: opportunities and challenges towards a China–EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment 1 YUWEN LI AND CHENG BIAN PART I China–EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: core issues 9 2 The China–EU investment agreement negotiations: rationale, motivations, and contentious issues 11 AXEL BERGER 3 Convergences and divergences in the China–EU and the China–US BIT negotiations 26 HONGYU FU AND MENG WAN 4 Elements of public policy in the making of the China–EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment 40 CHENG BIAN AND YUWEN LI 5 Bridging the gap between investments and human rights protection: prospects and challenges for the China–EU CAI 54 MATTHIEU BURNAY PART II Reforming ISDS: institutional aspects 69 6 Judicialization of ISDS: the European Union’s approach to multilateral reform of investment dispute settlement 71 COLIN M. BROWN AND ELIO GAARTHUIS vi Contents 7 Concrete issues in instituting an international investment court 87 JUN XIAO 8 Reforming ISDS: a Chinese perspective 100 HUIPING CHEN 9 China’s policy on ISDS reform: institutional choice in a diversified era 112 TONG QI 10 Investor-state arbitration: an economic and empirical perspective 124 MICHAEL FAURE AND WANLI MA PART III Reforming ISDS: substantive and procedural aspects 139 11 European perspectives on the role of national courts in the resolution of investor-state disputes 141 VID PRISLAN 12 Is (in)consistency a problem? A close look at juridical techniques in interpreting jurisdiction clauses in Chinese BIT cases 156 WEI SHEN 13 Transparency of ISDS in the making of a China–EU CAI: consensus and differences 170 MANJIAO CHI 14 The status of state-owned enterprises in ISDS from a European perspective 184 ALESSANDRO SPANO 15 The status of state-owned enterprises in ISDS from a Chinese perspective 198 SHENG ZHANG 16 Protection of victims in international investment dispute resolution: juxtaposing different topics? 212 MARTIJN SCHELTEMA 17 A comprehensive chapter on anti-corruption in the China–EU CAI: a progressive or an unnecessary step? 227 YUEMING YAN Index 243 Contributors Axel Berger is a renowned expert on EU-China investment relationships and China’s bilateral investment treaty practice. He works at the German Development Institute (Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik – DIE), Department for World Economy and Development Finance, Bonn, Germany. He is the head of the G20 Policy Research Group at DIE and leads the Think 20 (T20) Task Force on Trade, Investment and Tax. Axel Berger holds a doctorate in political science from the University of Duisburg-Essen and a master’s degree from Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich in political science, economics, and modern history. He works on the design, effects, and diffusion patterns of international trade and investment agreements, with a focus on emerging markets and developing countries. Other areas of his current research include the impact of FTAs on upgrading within global value chains and the role of the G20 in global governance. He regularly advises developing countries, development agencies, and international organi- zations on trade and investment matters. Axel Berger’s publications cover a wide range of topics in IIAs, FTAs, China–EU relations, and the G20. Cheng Bian is a researcher at the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. His research interests focus on international investment law, Chinese foreign investment law, and comparative law. He holds a PhD in law from the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. His PhD thesis is titled National Security Review Regimes of Foreign Investment – A Comparative Study in China, the US and the EU. Colin M. Brown is deputy head of the Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of Trade Policy Unit in the Directorate General for Trade (DG Trade), European Commission. He leads a team working on ISDS in the trade and investment policy of the EU. He has been responsible for developing the EU’s approach to ISDS and led the negotia- tions on this issue with Canada. He was the EU delegate to UNCITRAL during the preparation of the ‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration’. In his career with DG Trade, he has worked on all legal aspects of the work of the European Commission in the field of trade, in particular on EU-related FTAs. He also leads a team working on the EU-US TTIP negotiations. He holds an LLB (first class Honours) from the Faculty of Law of the University of Edinburgh, Scotland; a diploma in international relations from the Bologna Centre of the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University, Bologna, Italy; and an LLM in European Law from the College of Europe, Bruges. viii Contributors Matthieu Burnay is an assistant professor in global law at Queen Mary University of London. He has an interdisciplinary background in law, political science, and history. He holds a PhD in law from the University of Leuven and a double MSc degree in international affairs from Peking University and the London School of Economics. At Queen Mary, Dr Burnay teaches courses on law and globalization as well as Chinese law and institutions. His recent works include Chinese Perspectives on the Rule of Law and the International Rule of Law (Edward Elgar, 2018); ‘Soft Legal Transplants: EU-China Relations at a Glance’, in The EU and China: Reform and Governance (Routledge, 2017); ‘Zooming out of a Triangle: The Chinese Perspectives on the Rule of Law, Democracy, and Human Rights’, in Global Constitutionalism from European and East Asian Perspectives (CUP, 2017); ‘The Rule of Law as a Strategic Priority in EU External Action – Conceptualization and Implementation of EU Law and Policies’, Asia-Europe Journal, Vol. 14 (2016); and ‘The Case for an EU-China Rule of Law Dialogue: The Squaring of a Circle?’ Asia-Europe Journal, Vol. 14 (2016). Huiping Chen is a professor of international law at Xiamen University School of Law, China, where she teaches international investment law, public international law, and international human rights law. She received her PhD degree in International Law from Xiamen University in 1999. Prof. Chen has authored a variety of publications in both Chinese and English. Her selected English publications include a mono- graph titled OECD’s Multilateral Agreement on Investment: A Chinese Perspective (Kluwer Law International, 2002) and Transboundary Water Cooperation: Principles, Practice and Prospects for China and Its Neighbours (ed.) (Routledge, 2017). Her published English journal articles include ‘China’s Innovative ISDS Mechanisms and Their Implications’, American Journal of International Law Unbound, Vol. 112 (2018); ‘China’s “One Belt, One Road” Initiative and Its Implications for Sino- African Investment Relations’, Journal of Transnational Corporations Review, Vol. 8 (2016); ‘The Expansion of Jurisdiction by ICSID Tribunal: Approaches, Reasons and Damages’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 12 (2011); ‘The China- Korea FTA: the Investment Issue’, Korean Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 9 (2011); ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Where to Go in the 21st Century?’ The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 9 (2008); and ‘China- ASEAN Investment Agreement Negotiations – The Substantive Issues’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 7 (2006). Manjiao Chi is a professor at the School of Law University of International Business and Economics, Beijing. His research fields cover international trade and investment policy and law, natural resource law, dispute settlement, and global governance. Manjiao Chi’s publications relate to a wide range of legal topics in relation to international investment and trade law, dispute resolution, and global governance, both in English and Chinese. His recent English publications include Sustainable Development Provisions in Investment Treaties: An Empirical Exploration of the Sustainable Development Provisions in BITs of Asia-Pacific Least Developed Countries and Land-Locked Developing Countries (UN Publication, 2018); ‘How Chinese Investment Treaties Address Sustainable Development Concerns?’ in China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, Regional and Global Law and Policy (OUP, 2018); Integrating Sustainable Development into International Investment Law: Normative Incompatibility, System Integration and Governance Implications (Routledge, 2017); ‘The China–EU BIT as a Stepping Stone towards a China–EU FTA’, in European Yearbook of International Economic Law (Springer, 2017), Contributors ix ‘From Europeanization to Americanization: The Shift of China’s Dichotomic Investment Treaty-Making Strategy and Its Implications’, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 23 (2017); ‘A Long March towards Compatibility, Coherence and Consistency: The Future of China’s Investment Agreements’, Die Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, Vol. 18 (2015); and ‘The Evolution of Investor-State Arbitration Clauses in Chinese IIAs and Its Implications: The Admissibility of Disputes for Investor-State Arbitration’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 16 (2015). Michael Faure is a professor of comparative private law and economics and the direc- tor of the Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics at the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam. He is also a professor of comparative and international environmental law at Maastricht University, the Netherlands. Michael Faure’s core research is on international environmental law and environmental criminal law. He is also an expert on law and economics analysis, and particularly accident law. He has published and edited over 200 books and book chapters and has published over 500 journal articles and other academic outputs in top international academic journals in English, German, Dutch, and French. His most recent selected English publications include Environmental Governance of Common-Pool Resources. A Comparison of Fishery and Forestry (Routledge, 2018); Carbon Capture and Storage. Efficient Legal Policies for Risk Governance and Compensation (The MIT Press, 2017); Civil Liability and Financial Security for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities (ed.) (CUP, 2017); ‘Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court’, European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 13 (2017); and ‘Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hold for China? An Empirical Examination’, in Regulatory Reform in China and the EU. A Law and Economics Perspective (Edward Elgar, 2017). Hongyu Fu is an associate professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University School of Law, China. His research focuses on international investment law, anti-trust law, intellectual property law, and international financial law. He served as a delegate in the China–US BIT negotiations and is currently a legal adviser to the Ministry of Finance of China. Elio Gaarthuis is currently an LLM candidate at Harvard Law School, where he is pur- suing research on trade and investment law and corporate law. He has worked for the European Commission as a trainee in the Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of Trade Policy Unit and, prior to that, for the international arbitration department of Eversheds Sutherland in Paris. Yuwen Li is a professor of Chinese law and the director of the Erasmus China Law Centre at the Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Yuwen Li’s area of expertise includes Chinese law in general, with a special focus on Chinese foreign investment law, company law, and the judicial system in China. Her current research also covers compara- tive investment law, international investment law, and the EU-China trade and investment policy and treaty practice. She holds a BA in Chinese law from Peking University; an MA in international law and international relations from the Institute of Social Studies, the Hague; and a PhD in international law from Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Wanli Ma is currently a PhD candidate at Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam. His PhD topic is the role of domestic courts in investor-state dispute resolu- tion. He obtained his Bachelor and Master degree in law at China University of Political Science and Law.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.