PhilosoPhy B GReGoRy FRIed is Professor and Lectures given at the rise Martin Heidegger being and truth e Chair of the Philosophy depart- i Martin Heidegger ment at Suffolk University. He is of National Socialism n translated by author of Heidegger’s Polemos: g Gregory Fried and Richard Polt From Being to Politics and editor being and (with Richard Polt) of A Compan- a In these lectures, delivered “Fried and Polt’s translation of Martin n ion to Heidegger’s Introduction to in 1933–1934 while he d Metaphysics. truth was Rector of the University of Heidegger’s Being and Truth is a well- t Freiburg and an active supporter RICHaRd PolT is Professor and r of the national Socialist regime, crafted and careful rendering of an Chair of the Philosophy depart- u Martin Heidegger addresses the ment at Xavier University. He is t history of metaphysics and the important and demanding volume of the translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt author of The Emergency of Be- h notion of truth from Heraclitus to ing: On Heidegger’s Contributions Hegel. First published in German Complete Works.” to Philosophy and Heidegger: An in 2001, these two lecture courses Introduction. —andReW MITCHell, eMoRy UnIveRSITy offer a sustained encounter with M Heidegger’s thinking during a StudieS in Continental period when he attempted to give a thouGht r expression to his highest ambitions John Sallis, editor t i for a philosophy engaged with n politics and the world. While the H lectures are strongly nationalistic e and celebrate the revolutionary i d spirit of the time, they also attack e theories of racial supremacy in an g g attempt to stake out a distinctively e Heideggerian understanding of r what it means to be a people. This careful translation offers valuable insight into Heidegger’s views on language, truth, animality, and life, INDIANA as well as his political thought and activity. University Press Bloomington & Indianapolis Jacket illustration: www.iupress.indiana.edu Martin Heidegger, 1933. 1-800-842-6796 INDIANA Being and Truth Jkt. MECH.indd 1 6/25/10 11:07 AM Being and Truth Studies in Continental Thought EDITOR JOHN SALLIS CONSULTING EDITORS Robert Bernasconi William L. McBride Rudolf Bernet J. N. Mohanty John D. Caputo Mary Rawlinson David Carr Tom Rockmore Edward S. Casey Calvin O. Schrag Hubert L. Dreyfus †Reiner Schürmann Don Ihde Charles E. Scott David Farrell Krell Thomas Sheehan Lenore Langsdorf Robert Sokolowski Alphonso Lingis Bruce W. Wilshire David Wood Martin Heidegger Being and Truth Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt Indiana University Press Bloomington and Indianapolis This book is a publication of Indiana University Press 601 North Morton Street Bloomington, Indiana 47404-3797 USA www.iupress.indiana.edu Telephone orders 800-842-6796 Fax orders 812-855-7931 Orders by e-mail [email protected] Published in German as Martin Heidegger, Sein und Wahrheit © 2001 German edition by Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main © 2010 English edition by Indiana University Press All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any informa- tion storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses’ Resolution on Permissions consti- tutes the only exception to this prohibition. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Heidegger, Martin, 1889–1976. [Sein und Wahrheit. English] Being and truth / Martin Heidegger ; translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. p. cm. — (Studies in continental thought) ISBN 978–0–253–35511–9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Ontology. 2. Truth. I. Title. B3279.H48S3713 2010 193—dc22 2010005841 1 2 3 4 5 15 14 13 12 11 10 BEING AND TRUTH CONTENTS Translators’ Foreword xv THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION OF PHILOSOPHY Summer Semester 1933 Introduction The Fundamental Question of Philosophy and the Fundamental Happening of Our History 3 §1. The spiritual-political mission as a decision for the fundamental question 3 §2. The Greek questioning in poetry and thought and the inception of philosophy. Philosophy as the incessant, historical, questioning struggle over the essence and Being of beings 5 §3. What philosophy is not. Rejection of inadequate attempts to define it 7 §4. The fundamental question of philosophy and the confrontation with the history of the Western spirit in its highest position: Hegel 10 MAIN PArT The Fundamental Question and Metaphysics: Preparation for a Confrontation with Hegel Chapter One The Development, Transformation, and Christianization of Traditional Metaphysics 15 §5. Considerations for the confrontation with Hegel 15 §6. The concept of metaphysics and its transformation up to the time of classical modern metaphysics 17 a) The origin of the concept of metaphysics as a bibliographical title for particular Aristotelian writings (μετὰ τὰ φυσικά) 17 b) From the bibliographical title to the substantive concept. The Christian transformation of the concept of metaphysics: knowledge of the supersensible (trans physicam) 18 §7. Kant’s critical question regarding the possibility of metaphysical cognition and the classical division of metaphysics 20 a) On the influence of the Christianization of the concept of metaphysics 20 b) The three rational disciplines of modern metaphysics and Kant’s question regarding the inner possibility and limits of metaphysical cognition as cognition on the basis of pure reason 21 v vi Contents Chapter Two The System of Modern Metaphysics and the First of Its Primary Determining Grounds: The Mathematical 23 §8. Preliminary remarks on the concept and meaning of the mathematical in metaphysics 23 a) The task: a historical return to the turning points in the concept of metaphysics 23 b) The Greek concept of the teachable and learnable (τὰ μαθήματα) and the inner connection between the “mathematical” and the “methodological” 25 §9. The precedence of the mathematical and its advance decision regarding the content of modern philosophy: the possible idea of knowability and truth 29 §10. Modern metaphysics in its illusory new inception with Descartes and its errors 30 a) The usual picture of Descartes: the rigorous new grounding of philosophy on the basis of radical doubt 30 b) The illusion of radicalism and the new grounding in Descartes under the predominance of the mathematical conception of method 31 α) Methodical doubt as the way to what is ultimately indubitable. The simplest and most perspicuous as fundamentum 32 β) The process of doubt as an illusion. The substantive advance ruling in favor of something indubitable that has the character of the present-at-hand 33 γ) The fundamentum as the I 33 δ) The I as self. Self-reflection as a delusion 33 ε) The essence of the I (self) as consciousness 34 ζ) The self as I and the I as “subject.” The transformation of the concept of the subject 34 c) The substantive consequence of the predominance of the mathematical conception of method: the failure to reach the authentic self of man and the failure of the fundamental question of philosophy. The advance decision of mathematical certainty regarding truth and Being 35 §11. The predominance of the mathematical conception of method in the formation of metaphysical systems in the eighteenth century 37 §12. Introductory concepts from Wolff’s Ontology. The point of departure: the philosophical principles of all human cognition 38 Chapter Three Determination by Christianity and the Concept of Mathematical-Methodological Grounding in the Metaphysical Systems of Modernity 41 §13. The two main tasks that frame modern metaphysics: the grounding of the essence of Being in general and the proof of the essence and existence of God 41 Contents vii §14. The mathematical character of the system at the basis of Baumgarten’s metaphysics 42 a) The concept of veritas metaphysica: the agreement of what is with the most universal principles 42 b) Preliminary considerations on the principial character of the principle by which the ens in communi is supposed to be determined 43 §15. Baumgarten’s starting point as the possibile (what can be) and the logical principle of contradiction as the absolutely first principle of metaphysics 44 §16. Remarks on the grounding of the principium primum. The principle of contradiction and human Dasein: the preservation of the selfsameness of the selfsame 45 §17. The mathematical-logical determination of the starting point, goal, and deductive method in Baumgarten’s metaphysical system 48 a) The summum ens as perfectissimum. The belonging of the perfectum to the concept of Being and its suitability as leading to the highest being 49 b) The main steps in the construction of the metaphysical system 50 α) Beginning with what is thinkable in thought as judgment (assertion) and the principle of sufficient reason 50 β) The logical delimitation of the ens. Possibilitas as essentia (what-Being): compatibility of the internal and simple determinations 51 γ) The relatio ad unum of essentia as perfectum. The mathematical sense of the concord of the perfectum 52 δ) The suitability of the perfectum as leading to the summum ens: the mathematically-logically necessary capacity of the perfectum to be increased to the perfectissimum 53 ε) The summum ens as perfectissimum and the inherent determinations of its Being 53 Chapter Four Hegel: The Completion of Metaphysics as Theo-logic 55 §18. Transition to Hegel 55 §19. The fundamental character of Hegelian metaphysics. Metaphysics as theo-logic 56 a) Hegel’s metaphysics as logic 57 α) The science of logic as authentic metaphysics 57 β) Metaphysics as logic in its higher form. The logic of the logos as logic of the pure essentialities 57 γ) The higher logic as logic of reason 59 αα) The essence of reason as self-conscious knowing 59 ββ) The truth (the self-knowledge) of reason as absolute spirit 59 b) Logic as the system of the absolute self-consciousness of God: theo-logic 60 viii Contents §20. The completion of Western philosophy in metaphysics as theo-logic and the questionworthiness of this “completion” 61 Conclusion 62 §21. Confrontation and engagement 62 ON THE ESSENCE OF TrUTH Winter Semester 1933–1934 Introduction The Question of Essence as Insidious and Unavoidable 67 §1. The question of the essence of truth and the willing of what is true in our Dasein 67 §2. The question of the essence of essence. Presuppositions and beginning 69 a) Dasein’s becoming essential in authentic care for its ability to be and the putting to work of the essence of things. The how of essence 69 b) The question of the what of essence. Harkening back to the Greek inception 71 §3. The saying of Heraclitus. Struggle as the essence of beings 72 a) The first part of the saying. Struggle as the power of generation and preservation: innermost necessity of beings 72 b) The second part of the saying. The sway of the double power of struggle and the decisive domains of power 74 §4. On the truth of the Heraclitean saying 76 a) Two traditional meanings of truth. Truth as un-concealment (ἀ-λήθεια) and as correctness 76 b) The indeterminate prior knowing of truth and the superior power of Being 79 §5. On truth and language 80 a) The human bond to the superior power of Being and the necessity of language 80 b) The logical-grammatical conception of language 81 c) The characterization of language as sign and expression 83 d) Toward a positive delimitation of the essence of language 83 e) The ability to keep silent as the origin and ground of language 84 f) Language as the gathered openedness for the overpowering surge of beings 89 g) Language as lawgiving gathering and revelation of the structure of beings 90 h) Language as λόγος and as μῦθος 91 §6. The double sway of the struggle (ἔδειξε—ἐποίησε) as indication of the connection between Being and truth 92 §7. The historical transformation of the essence of truth and Dasein 93 Contents ix §8. The disappearance of truth as un-concealment in the traditional transmission of the concept of truth 94 a) The long-accustomed conception of truth as correctness. The agreement between proposition and thing 94 b) The last struggle between the earlier (inceptive) and later concept of truth in the philosophy of Plato 96 §9. The start of the investigation with the myth of the “allegory of the cave” as the center of Platonic philosophy 97 PArT ONE Truth and Freedom: An Interpretation of the Allegory of the Cave in Plato’s Republic Chapter One The Four Stages of the Happening of Truth 101 §10. Interpretive procedure and the structure of the allegory of the cave 101 A. The first stage (514a–515c) 103 §11. The situation of the human being in the subterranean cave 103 §12. What is unconcealed in the cave 104 B. The second stage (515c–515e5) 106 §13. A “liberation” of the human being within the cave 106 §14. Expanded conception of unconcealment in the failure of the first attempt at liberation 108 C. The third stage (515e5–516e2) 110 §15. The authentic liberation of the human being to the originary light 110 §16. Liberation and unconcealment. Four questions about their connection 113 §17. On the concept of the idea 115 a) Preliminary remark on the significance of the doctrine of the ideas in the history of spirit 115 b) The fundamental orientation of knowledge toward “seeing” and what is seen 116 §18. Idea and light 118 a) On the idea in the context of Platonic thought. The priority of seeing and its broader concept 118 b) The seeing of what-Being. Idea and Being: presencing—self-presence in the view 119 c) The essence of light and brightness: transparency that is perceived and seen in advance 120 §19. Light and freedom 122 a) On the determination of man on the basis of seeing, hearing, and speaking 122 b) Freedom as binding oneself to the illuminating 124
Description: