Master's Degree Thesis ISRN: BTH-AMT-EX--2013/D06--SE Application of Transmissibility Measurement in Estimation of Modal Parameter s for a Structure AmirHossein Aghdasi Department of Mechanical Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona, Sweden 2013 Supervisors: Andreas Josefsson, BTH Ansel Berghuvud, BTH Application of transmissibility measurement in estimation of modal parameters for a structure AmirHossein Aghdasi Department of Mechanical Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona, Sweden 2012 Thesis submitted for completion of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering with emphasis on Structural Mechanics at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden. Abstract: Identification of modal parameters from output-only data is studied in this work. The proposed methodology uses transmissibility functions obtained under different loading conditions to identify resonances and mode shapes. The technique is demonstrated with numerical simulations on a 2-DOF system and a cantilever beam. To underpin the simulations, a real test was done on a beam to show the efficiency of the method. A practical application of the method can be to identify structures subjected to moving loads. This is demonstrated by using FEM-model of a cantilever beam with a moving load. Keywords: Operational Modal Analysis, Transmissibility measurement, mode shape, MATLAB. Acknowledgements This work was carried out at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, under the supervision of Andreas Josefsson and Ansel Berghuvud. First of all, I do appreciate my parents that they always support me in any aspect of my life. I am so grateful to Dr.Andreas Josefsson for all that he has done for me throughout this paper. I really thank Dr.Ansel Berghuvud for his support all the time. Special thanks should be dedicated to Mohammad Mahdi Khatibi and also my professor Mohammad Reza Ashory that he kindly and patiently helped me out in this regard. Karlskrona, March 2013 AmirHossein Aghdasi 2 Contents 1 Notation 4 2 Introduction 6 2.1 Aim and scope 7 2.2 Modal Analysis 7 2.2.1 Theoretical track of a vibrational analysis 8 2.2.2 Experimental track of a vibrational analysis 9 2.3 Research methods 12 3 Operational Modal Analysis 12 4 Transmissibility concept 14 5 Simulation study 15 5.1 2-DOF system 16 5.1.1 Conclusion 23 5.2 Beam system 23 5.2.1 Conclusion 37 6 Experimental validation 38 6.1 Conclusion 45 7 Harmonic in Transmissibility 46 8 Conclusion 52 9 Appendices 53 10 References 55 3 1 Notation A Residue B Band width c Damping E Young’s modulus F Force f Frequency H Frequency Response Function I Moment of inertia k Stiffness m Mass S Second decomposed matrix s Pole T Transmissibility U First decomposed matrix V Third decomposed matrix X(s) Displacement in frequency domain X Displacement x Length λ Pole ζ Damping ratio ω Imaginary part of the system pole or damped natural frequency σ2 Variance 4 Abbreviations DOF Degree Of Freedom EMA Experimental Modal Analysis EFFD Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition FDD Frequency Domain Decomposition FRF Frequency Response Function MDOF Multiple Degree of Freedom OMA Operational Modal Analysis SVD Singular Value Decomposition TR Transmissibility matrix 5 2 Introduction Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) is being increasingly used as an experimental technique to identify the dynamic properties of many types of large-scale constructed systems. For industrial structures in real operation condition, it is sometimes hard or impossible to measure excitation forces so some identification techniques have been developed to work on response data only. In Operational Modal Analysis (OMA), there is no need to make any assumption about the nature of force and consequently resonance frequencies are recognised. In this thesis, one application of Operational Modal Analysis which is called transmissibility measurement is supposed to be engaged to find resonance frequencies. Operational Modal Analysis has become a valid alternative for structures where a classic forced-vibration test would be difficult to conduct. The use of in-operation modal analysis is particularly interesting because the structure remains in its normal in-operating condition during the test. This is an important advantage because the conditions during a laboratory forced-vibration test are often considerably different from the real working conditions regardless of constraints and limitations. Therefore, this method enables us to find system parameters without any assumption about the nature of the forces. 6 2.1 Aim and scope In this thesis, first of all, a concise explanation of Modal is presented. We will be dealing with Operational Modal Analysis and its differences with Experimental Modal Analysis in chapter 3. We will then discuss about the concept of transmissibility in chapter 4. Afterwards, we will turn into the simulation to explain the method. It has been used a 2-DOF system and a multiple degree of freedom system such as a cantilever beam in chapter 5. To verify the simulation study, an experiment has been done on a both end free beam to find modal parameters by means of transmissibility measurement. This validation has been presented in chapter 6. We will be dealing with a challenging matter in Operational Modal Analysis in chapter 7. To do so, an investigation of moving load has been taken into account. Finally, we will be dealing with conclusion and discussion about the results in chapter 8. 2.2 Modal Analysis Modal analysis is the process of determining the dynamic behaviour of a system in forms of natural frequencies, damping factors and mode shapes, and using them to formulate a mathematical model for its dynamic characteristic. The formulated mathematical model is referred to as the modal of the system and the information for the characteristics is known as its modal data [1]. For further information see Ref [1]. Design, repair and protection of various structures such as buildings, bridges, dams, trains are important and necessary. One of the design and repair tools for protecting a structure is dynamic analysis. There are a few problems and errors with respect to applying improper assumptions and theories, the lack of information about the material properties and system modelling, numerical methods such as Finite Element Method have posed inaccurate analytical solution for complex structures. Therefore, Modal test has been known a useful tool to achieve dynamic properties of a structure. Modal test has basically two problems in big structures: 7 1. Excitation is difficult for big structure such as bridges and buildings. 2. The presence of noise in environment. Once the structure is excited for Modal test, the level of excitation should be great as much as the structure equilibrium is unbalanced. Therefore, a big excitation force is demanded for doing so. On the other hand, the excitation level could not have been very big because it poses non-linear behaviour and distraction in the structure. Moreover, some factors such as wind, noise contamination, traffic harden the process of test measurement. Therefore, the Modal Analysis theory has a great effect on a successful test because this theory allots dominant part of concept using various steps in an experiment. In general, vibrational analysis of a structure is possible to consider in two approaches: 1) theoretical method 2) experimental method. 2.2.1 Theoretical track of a vibrational analysis Different steps of Modal analysis have been shown in figure 2.2.1.1. The figure shows three different steps of a sample of vibrational analysis. Spatial Model Modal Model Response Model Description of Vibration Response Structure Modes Levels Mass damping Natural frequencies Frequency Stiffness & Mode shapes Responses & Impulse Responses Figure 2.2.1.1- Theoretical track in vibration analysis In general, in a spatial model, physical properties of a structure is divided in a form of mass, stiffness and damping. By means of applying Modal theory on spatial model, the behaviour of a structure is defined in a form of 8
Description: