ebook img

Alphaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae glycoprotein L and CMV UL130 originate from chemokines. PDF

2.5 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Alphaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae glycoprotein L and CMV UL130 originate from chemokines.

Malkowskaetal.VirologyJournal2013,10:1 http://www.virologyj.com/content/10/1/1 HYPOTHESIS Open Access Alphaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae glycoprotein L and CMV UL130 originate from chemokines Maja Malkowska1, Katarzyna Kokoszynska1, Magdalena Dymecka1,2, Leszek Rychlewski2 and Lucjan S Wyrwicz1* Abstract Herpesviridae is a large family of DNA viruses divided intothree subfamilies: Alpha-,Beta- and Gammaherpesvirinae. The process of herpesvirus transmissionis mediated bya range of proteins, one ofwhich is glycoproteinL (gL). Based onour analysis ofthe solved structures of HSV2 and EBV gH/gL complexes,we propose that Alphaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae glycoproteinL and Betaherpesvirinae UL130 originate from chemokines. Herpes simplex virus type 2gL and humancytomegalovirus homolog (UL130) adopt a novelC chemokine-like fold, whileEpstein-Barr virus gL mimics a CCchemokine structure. Hence, it is possible that gL interface with specific chemokine receptors during the transmission of Herpesviridae. We conclude that the further understanding of the function of viral chemokine-like proteins inHerpesviridae infection maylead to development ofnovelprophylactic and therapeutic treatment. Keywords: Herpesviridae,Glycoprotein L,GL, UL130, Chemokines, HCMV, HSV2,EBV Background studies on gH/gL biology have been carried out, there is Asa family of dsDNAviruses, Herpesviridae are known to still no unequivocal evidence whether this complex plays infectvertebrates,includinghumans,andcauseprogression role in the recognition of specific cells (tissues) or directly of various contagious diseases, such as orofacial herpes takespartinmembranefusion[5]. (HSV1), genital herpes (HSV2), chickenpox and shingles Thechemokinefamilyhasbeencreatedbasedonstruc- (VZV), opportunistic infections (CMV), Kaposi’s sarcoma tural similarity. The characteristics features are the Greek (KSHV) and mononucleosis (EBV) [1]. Members of the key shape and conserved cysteine residues forming Herpesviridaefamilyhavebeenclassifiedintothreedistinct SS-bonds and stabilizing the structure. Chemokine family subfamilies: Alpha- (HSV1, HSV2, VZV); Beta- (CMV, differs in terms of sequence similarity, which vary from HHV-6,HHV-7);Gammaherpesvirinae(EBV,KSHV). less than 20% to over 90% [6]. Based on the position of The cell-to-cell transmission of virions is one of limiting conservedcysteineschemokine classificationdividesthem steps in spread of infection. The targeting of a specific tis- intofoursub-families(CC,CXC,CandCX C). 3 sue for infection is based on the recognition of definite Chemokine mimicry is a common phenomenon among entry receptors [2]. The virus used as a model of herpetic herpesvirus, poxvirus and retrovirus families [7-9]. So far, infectionisHSV1.Initsgenome,11outof80genesencode over 30 chemokine and chemokine receptor mimics have outer membrane glycoproteins. According to previous been described. Except for HCMV UL130 and HSV2 gL studies, glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB) and the no other viral proteins have been designated as C type complex of glycoproteins H and L (gH/gL) are curial pro- chemokinehomologs[10-12]. teins for cell-to-cell fusion [3,4]. Although numerous Presentationofthehypothesis *Correspondence:[email protected] In our previous report, based on bioinformatic analysis of 1LaboratoryofBioinformaticsandBiostatistics,MariaSklodowska-Curie protein families, we concluded the possibility of a distant MemorialCancerCenterandInstituteofOncology,WKRoentgena5,02-781, homology between Herpesviridae glycoprotein L (gL) Warsaw,Poland Fulllistofauthorinformationisavailableattheendofthearticle and chemokines [12]. We also remarked that human ©2013Malkowskaetal.;licenseeBioMedCentralLtd.ThisisanOpenAccessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),whichpermitsunrestricteduse, distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited. Malkowskaetal.VirologyJournal2013,10:1 Page2of5 http://www.virologyj.com/content/10/1/1 Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) contains an additional gene (UL130) which might encode an orthologous chemokine- like protein. This study was followed by crystallographic determination of the structure of two gH/gL complexes. Chowdary andco-workerscrystallographically determined thestructureoftheHSV2(Herpessimplexvirus2)gH/gL complex,whilstMatsuuraetal.describedthecrystalstruc- tureofanEpstein-Barrvirus(EBV)complex[13,14]. Although not noticed in the original reports by Chowdary et al. and Matsuura et al., it is important to note that the topologies of both solved glycoproteins are highly concordantwith thehomologymodels [12]. We hypothesize that the betaherpevirus UL130 as well as alpha- and gammaherpesvirus gL proteins exhibit structural similarity with chemokines and may interact with theirreceptors. The structural comparison between EBV gL and CC-type chemokines leaves no doubt that it adopts a CC chemokine-like fold. Figure 1 shows the superim- Figure1SuperimposednativestructuresofC-Cmotif chemokine5(green;PDBentry:1U4LA)andEBVglycoprotein posed structures of a CC-type chemokine (human C-C L(cyan;PDBentry3PHFB).Thecysteineresiduesaremarkedin motif chemokine 5; Protein Data Bank entry: 1U4L_A) red(C-Cmotifchemokine5)andmagenta(gL). and the native structure of EBV glycoprotein L (Protein Data Bank entry 3PHF_B) which exhibit a root mean square deviation (RMSD) for C-alpha atoms of 1.23 Å UL130 to C type chemokine subfamily (Figure 5). Despite (analysis performed for atoms forming the curved beta- of the loss of 2nd and 4th cytosine the chemotactic activity sheet). The conserved topology is a result of the pres- might be preserved and requires further investigation as it ence of two cysteine bridges (see Figure 1). Furthermore, might explain the mechanism of UL130 functioning in the putative interaction surface of EBV’s glycoprotein L EndothelialCellinfection[17]. with chemokines is also preserved (for the conserved Mutagenesis of interleukine-8 showed that perturbation pattern of hydrophobic amino acids see Figure 2). The of the cysteine bridge between 2nd and 4th motif element major difference is a result of the altered angle between hadsmalleffectsonitsfunctionwhereas themodification the helix and the curved beta-sheet, which is to be of the disulfide between 1st and 3rd cysteine dramatically expected, since the helix in chemokines is involved in reduced potency [18]. This fact supports our hypothesis dimerizationduringreceptor recognition, whilstgL lacks the ability to dimerize. A further difference can be seen in the presence of two additional helices at the C-terminus of glycoprotein L – 15 and 6 residues long respectively,separated byalinkofonlytwo aminoacids. Comparison of cysteine positions in CXC motif in interleukine-8 (IL-8) and lymphotactin (C type chemo- kine) has shown the conservation of 1nd and 4th cysteine (Figure3),whereasincaseofIL-8andgLfrom HSV2the 1st and 3rd cysteines are conserved (Figure 4). Despite the non-conserved cysteine position, based on structural similarity, we propose that gL HSV2 shall be classified as Ctypechemokine-likeprotein. Due to synteny, rat cytomegalovirus r131 gene encoding a proinflammatory CC chemokine-like protein has been recognized as HCMV UL130 homolog [15,16]. Sequence identity and similarity between r131 and UL130 is 19.1% Figure2SuperimposednativestructuresoftheCC-type and 41.1% respectively (calculations were performed with chemokineeotaxin-2(green;PDBentry:1EIGA)andEBV PAM250scoringmatrixforglobalalignment).Theposition glycoproteinL(light-green;PDBentry3PHFB).Thehydrophobic ofconservedcysteines(1stand3rdcysteineofcharacteristic surfacesaremarkedinblue(eotaxin-2)andlight-blue(gL),cysteine residuesinmagenta(eotaxin-2)andlight-pink(gL). CXC type chemokine motif) leads to the assignment of Malkowskaetal.VirologyJournal2013,10:1 Page3of5 http://www.virologyj.com/content/10/1/1 Figure3Multiplesequencealignmentoflymphotactin(XCL1)andinterleukin-8(IL-8).Thecorrespondingsequenceswerelabeledwith theirGenBankentries(denotedbytheGenBankidentifier-gi)andorganismoforigin.Thenumbersinbracketsrefertothepositionsofthe presentedsequencefragments.Theobserved(ProteinDataBankentries1J8I_AforXCL1and1IL8_AforIL-8)andpredicted(Psipred)secondary structureelementsarecodedwithletters(H-a-helix,G-3 helix,E-b-strands).DisulphidebridgesinIL-8hasbeenmarkedwitharrows 10 andnumbered. that partial conservation of cysteines in UL130 does not [22].AlignmentfiguresweremadewiththeuseofBioEdit necessarilyimplyalackofchemotacticactivity. version 7.1.3 alignment editor [23]. Residue conservation The speculation concerning the co-evolution of the two werepresentedinalignmentwiththefollowingdefaultfor interactingglycoproteins[14]causesustopresumethatthe thesoftwarescheme:positivelychargedhighlightedinred; most likely cause of such concordance is that glycoprotein negatively charged in blue; hydrophobic in dark green; L arose asa result oflateral gene transfer from thehost.It tryptophan in light green; polar uncharged and proline in is very likely that early in the evolution of Herpesviridae, gray; histidine in magenta; glycine in yellow; alanine, glycoprotein L acted predominantly as a virus encoded phenylalanine and tyrosine in cyan; cysteine in maroon. chemokine (compare viral chemokines: UL146, UL147, Modeller9wasusedtocreatehomologymodels[24].The UL152 encoded by HCMV [19]), which later co-evolved structures were visualized with PyMOL v. 0.99rc6 which withtheothermembraneviralgenes. alsoenablesRMSDcalculations[25]. In presented analysis we have used a typical homology modeling workbench. The sets of homologs from the NR Testingthehypothesis database (NCBI; National Center for Biotechnology) were Verylowsequencesimilaritybetweenvariouschemokines createdusingPSI-BLAST[20]search methodandaligned and gL prevents any phylogenetic studies of the origin of with ClustalW [21]. Secondary structure predictions for these protein families from being carried out, and we are selected proteins were calculated using PSIPRED method unable to justify whether the different topology types Figure4MultiplesequencealignmentofglycoproteinL(foundinAlphaherpesvirinae)andinterleukin-8(IL-8).Thecorresponding sequenceswerelabeledwiththeirGenBankentries(denotedbytheGenBankidentifier-gi)andorganismoforigin.Thenumbersinbrackets refertothepositionsofthepresentedsequencefragments.Theobserved(ProteinDataBankentries3M1C_BforgLand1IL8_AforIL-8)and predicted(Psipred)secondarystructureelementsarecodedwithletters(H-a-helix,G-3 helix,E-b-strands).DisulphidebridgesinIL-8has 10 beenmarkedwitharrowsandnumbered. Malkowskaetal.VirologyJournal2013,10:1 Page4of5 http://www.virologyj.com/content/10/1/1 Figure5MultiplesequencealignmentofUL130(foundinBetaherpesvirinae)andinterleukin-8(IL-8).Thecorrespondingsequenceswere labeledwiththeirGenBankentries(denotedbytheGenBankidentifier-gi)andorganismoforigin.Thenumbersinbracketsrefertothe positionsofthepresentedsequencefragments.Theobserved(ProteinDataBankentry1IL8_AforIL-8)andpredicted(Psipred)secondary structureelementsarecodedwithletters(H-a-helix,G-3 helix,E-b-strands).DisulphidebridgesinIL-8hasbeenmarkedwitharrows 10 andnumbered. (CC for Gammaherpesvirinae, C for the Alpha group and Competinginterests HCMV) come from a single event in the early divergence Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterests. of Herpesviridae, or rather arose from two independent Authors’contributions eventsoflateralgenetransfer. MM,KK,LSWparticipatedinthedesignofthestudy.MM,KK,MD,LRand Discussed here glycoproteins are present in viral enve- LSWcarriedoutthebioinformaticsanalysis.MM,KK,LSWwrotethe lope and mediate virus entry to host cells. Their mech- manuscript.Allauthorsreadandapprovedthefinalmanuscript. anism and function as chemokine-like proteins however, Acknowledgements remains unknown. There is a potential for further ana- ThisworkwassupportedbythePolishNationalCentreforResearchand lysis by experimental characterization of specific chemo- Development(NCBiR)INNOTECHProgramme(IN1/159417). tactic activities of gL and UL130 proteins. Necessary Authordetails step would be in vivo expression during viral persistence 1LaboratoryofBioinformaticsandBiostatistics,MariaSklodowska-Curie andverification oftheirrelease from cells. Toestablishif MemorialCancerCenterandInstituteofOncology,WKRoentgena5,02-781, theseproteinsarefunctionalchemokinesandwhichcells Warsaw,Poland.2BioInfoBankInstitute,Limanowskiego24A,60-744,Poznań, Poland. are their targets in vivo migration assays shall be per- formed. Site-directed mutagenesis would help to deter- Received:6April2012Accepted:18December2012 mine functional domains that are critical for migration. Published:2January2013 Ligand-binding assays could indicate binding affinity to References chemokinereceptors. 1. WhitleyRJ:Herpesviruses.InMedicalMicrobiology.4thedition.Editedby BaronS.Galveston(TX):1996. Implicationsofthehypothesis 2. SpearPG:Herpessimplexvirus:receptorsandligandsforcellentry. CellMicrobiol2004,6(5):401–410. We conclude that gL could interact with specific cellular 3. RoopC,HutchinsonL,JohnsonDC:Amutantherpessimplexvirustype1 chemokinereceptorsduringtheinvasionofHerpesviridae. unabletoexpressglycoproteinLcannotentercells,anditsparticleslack The results of our study lead to the conclusion that the glycoproteinH.JVirol1993,67(4):2285–2297. 4. GeraghtyRJ,KrummenacherC,CohenGH,EisenbergRJ,SpearPG:Entryof herpesvirus transmission processcan be dependent on gL alphaherpesvirusesmediatedbypoliovirusreceptor-relatedprotein1 interaction with specific cellular chemokine receptors. andpoliovirusreceptor.Science1998,280(5369):1618–1620. Thepresented hypothesis mightbecomea basis for creat- 5. MacleanCA:HSVEntryandSpread.MethMolMed1998,10:9–18. 6. FernandezEJ,LolisE:Structure,function,andinhibitionofchemokines. ing new vaccine targets as well as binding inhibitors, AnnuRevPharmacolToxicol2002,42:469–499. which will contribute to the development of novel thera- 7. MacDonaldMR,LiXY,VirginHW:Lateexpressionofabetachemokine peutic and prophylactic strategies. However, all the as- homologbymurinecytomegalovirus.JVirol1997,71(2):1671–1678. 8. SmithCA,SmithTD,SmolakPJ,FriendD,HagenH,GerhartM,ParkL, sumptions require further studies [26,27]. In order to PickupDJ,TorranceD,MohlerK,etal:Poxvirusgenomesencodea understand the role of gL in infection and answer ques- secreted,solubleproteinthatpreferentiallyinhibitsbetachemokine tionsaboutitsexactfunctioning,furtherstudyisrequired. activityyetlackssequencehomologytoknownchemokinereceptors. Virology1997,236(2):316–327. The analogical role of UL130 in HCMV and its role in 9. LittmanDR:Chemokinereceptors:keystoAIDSpathogenesis?Cell1998, infectionneedsfurtherexplanation. 93(5):677–680. Malkowskaetal.VirologyJournal2013,10:1 Page5of5 http://www.virologyj.com/content/10/1/1 10. MurphyPM:Viralexploitationandsubversionoftheimmunesystem throughchemokinemimicry.NatImmunol2001,2(2):116–122. 11. BoomkerJM,deLeijLF,TheTH,HarmsenMC:Viralchemokine-modulatory proteins:toolsandtargets.CytokineGrowthFactorRev2005,16(1):91–103. 12. WyrwiczLS,RychlewskiL:HerpesglycoproteingLisdistantlyrelatedto chemokinereceptorligands.AntiviralRes2007,75(1):83–86. 13. ChowdaryTK,CairnsTM,AtanasiuD,CohenGH,EisenbergRJ,HeldweinEE: Crystalstructureoftheconservedherpesvirusfusionregulatorcomplex gH-gL.NatStructMolBiol2010,17(7):882–888. 14. MatsuuraH,KirschnerAN,LongneckerR,JardetzkyTS:Crystalstructureof theEpstein-Barrvirus(EBV)glycoproteinH/glycoproteinL(gH/gL) complex.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA2010,107(52):22641–22646. 15. KapteinSJ,vanCleefKW,GruijthuijsenYK,BeukenEV,vanBuggenhoutL, BeisserPS,StassenFR,BruggemanCA,VinkC:Ther131geneofrat cytomegalovirusencodesaproinflammatoryCCchemokinehomolog whichisessentialfortheproductionofinfectiousvirusinthesalivary glands.VirusGenes2004,29(1):43–61. 16. VomaskeJ,DentonM,KreklywichC,AndohT,OsbornJM,ChenD, MessaoudiI,OrloffSL,StreblowDN:CytomegalovirusCCChemokine PromotesImmuneCellMigration.JVirol2012,86(21):11833–11844. 17. PatroneM,SecchiM,FiorinaL,IerardiM,MilanesiG,GallinaA:Human cytomegalovirusUL130proteinpromotesendothelialcellinfection throughaproducercellmodificationofthevirion.JVirol2005, 79(13):8361–8373. 18. RajarathnamK,SykesBD,DewaldB,BaggioliniM,Clark-LewisI:Disulfide bridgesininterleukin-8probedusingnon-naturaldisulfideanalogues: dissociationofrolesinstructurefromfunction.Biochemistry1999, 38(24):7653–7658. 19. VinkC,BeisserPS,BruggemanCA:Molecularmimicryby cytomegaloviruses.Functionofcytomegalovirus-encodedhomologues ofGprotein-coupledreceptors,MHCclassIheavychainsand chemokines.Intervirology1999,42(5–6):342–349. 20. AltschulSF,MaddenTL,SchafferAA,ZhangJ,ZhangZ,MillerW,LipmanDJ: GappedBLASTandPSI-BLAST:anewgenerationofproteindatabase searchprograms.NucleicAcidsRes1997,25(17):3389–3402. 21. ThompsonJD,GibsonTJ,HigginsDG:Multiplesequencealignmentusing ClustalWandClustalX.Currentprotocolsinbioinformatics/editoralboard, AndreasDBaxevanis[etal.].2002.Chapter2:Unit23. 22. McGuffinLJ,BrysonK,JonesDT:ThePSIPREDproteinstructureprediction server.Bioinformatics2000,16(4):404–405. 23. BioEdit:BiologicalsequencealignmenteditorforWin95/98/NT/2K/XP,Version 7.1.3.http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html. 24. SaliA,BlundellTL:Comparativeproteinmodelingbysatisfactionof spatialrestraints.JMolBiol1993,234(3):779–815. 25. ThePyMOLMolecularGraphicsSystem,Version0.99rc6.http://pymol.org/. 26. SaccoccioFM,SauerAL,CuiX,ArmstrongAE,elSEH,JohnsonDC, RyckmanBJ,KlingelhutzAJ,AdlerSP,McVoyMA:Peptidesfrom cytomegalovirusUL130andUL131proteinsinducehightiterantibodies thatblockviralentryintomucosalepithelialcells.Vaccine2011, 29(15):2705–2711. 27. SaccoccioFM,GallagherMK,AdlerSP,McVoyMA:Neutralizingactivityof salivaagainstcytomegalovirus.ClinVaccineImmunol:CVI2011, 18(9):1536–1542. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-10-1 Citethisarticleas:Malkowskaetal.:Alphaherpesvirinaeand GammaherpesvirinaeglycoproteinLandCMVUL130originatefrom chemokines.VirologyJournal201310:1. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: • Convenient online submission • Thorough peer review • No space constraints or color figure charges • Immediate publication on acceptance • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar • Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.