ebook img

AGN Winds and the Black-Hole - Galaxy Connection PDF

0.23 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview AGN Winds and the Black-Hole - Galaxy Connection

**VolumeTitle** ASPConferenceSeries,Vol.**VolumeNumber** **Author** (cid:13)c**CopyrightYear**AstronomicalSocietyofthePacific AGNWinds andthe Black-Hole-GalaxyConnection 2 1 KastytisZubovas1,AndrewR.King1 0 2 1 Dept. ofPhysics&Astronomy,University ofLeicester, Leicester,LE17RH, n UK;mailto:[email protected] a J Abstract. 7 During the last decade, wide–angle powerful outflows from AGN, both on par- 1 sec and kpc scales, have been detected in many galaxies. These outflows are widely suspectedtoberesponsibleforsweepinggalaxiesclearoftheirgas.Wepresentthean- ] A alyticalmodeldescribingthepropagationofsuchoutflowsandcalculatetheirobserv- G able properties. Large–scale AGN–driven outflows should have kinetic luminosities ∼ ηL /2 ∼ 0.05L andmomentumrates∼ 20L /c,where L istheEddington h. luminEoddsityoftheceEndtdralblackholeandη ∼ 0.1itsErdaddiativeaccreEtidodnefficiency. This p createsan expandingtwo–phasemediuminwhichmolecularspeciescoexistwith hot - gas, which can persist after the central AGN has switched off. This picture predicts o outflowvelocities∼1000−1500kms−1andmassoutflowratesupto4000M yr−1on r ⊙ t kpc scales, fixedmainly by the hostgalaxyvelocitydispersion(or equivalentlyblack s holemass).Wecompareourpredictionwithrecentobservationaldata,findingexcellent a [ agreement,andsuggestfutureobservationaltestsofthispicture. 1 v 0 4 1. Introduction 5 3 . Recently, two sets of observations have allowed us to gain a better understanding of 1 theinteraction betweenAGNsandtheirhostgalaxies. Theseareobservations ofhigh– 0 2 velocitywide–anglewindsemanatingfromthevicinityoftheSMBH,whichhavebeen 1 detected in a large fraction of AGNs (Tombesietal. 2010a,b); and detection of kpc– : scale quasi–spherical outflows in active galaxies, with enough power and mass flow v i tosweeptheirhostgalaxies clearofgas(Feruglioetal.2010;Rupke&Veilleux2011; X Sturmetal. 2011; Riffel&Storchi-Bergmann 2011a,b). These outflows have kinetic r powerequaltoafewpercentoftheEddingtonluminosity ofthecentralblackholeand a theirmomentumflowrateisapproximately anorderofmagnitude greaterthan L /c. Edd In this paper, we show how the two types of flows can be explained within the frameworkofAGNwindfeedback. RadiationpressurefromanaccretingSMBHexpels gasinformofawindfromthenucleus(e.g.Poundsetal.2003a,b),whichthenpushes theambientgasinthehostgalaxyandproduces anoutflow. Inrecentwork(Kingetal. 2011;Zubovas&King2012)wehaveshownthatlarge–scaleenergy–driven flows(see Section 3) can indeed drive much of the interstellar gas out of a galaxy bulge on a dynamical timescale ∼ 108 yr, leaving it red and dead. The remaining mass of the bulge is then similar to the value set by the observed black–hole – bulge–mass rela- tion (e.g. Ha¨ring&Rix 2004). The observable features of such outflows – velocities, kinetic powersand massandmomentum flowrates –areconsistent withobservations. ThereforeAGNoutflowsappearcapableofsweepinggalaxiesclearofgas. 1 2 KastytisZubovas,AndrewR.King 2. ClosetotheSMBH–winds RadiationpressurefromanAGNaccretingatclosetoitsEddingtonlimitcanexpelgas fromthevicinity ofthenucleus withamomentumrate L M˙ v = Edd, (1) w w c as the wind on average has scattering optical depth ∼ 1 and absorbs all of the radi- ation momentum. This creates a mildly relativistic diffuse wind (M˙ ∼ M˙ and w Edd v ∼ ηc ∼ 0.1c, where η ≃ 0.1 is the accretion radiative efficiency King 2003; w King&Pounds 2003). Observations of blueshifted X–ray iron absorption lines cor- responding to velocities ∼ 0.1c (e.g. Poundsetal. 2003a,b; Tombesietal. 2010a,b) reveal that the majority of quasars produce such winds. The winds have momentum andenergyrates L 1 P˙ ∼ Edd; E˙ = M˙ v2 ∼ 0.05L . (2) w c w 2 w w Edd 3. Outinthegalaxy–outflows It is clear that the wind has enough kinetic power to drive the observed large scale outflow, provided that it can efficiently transfer this power to the ISM. In order for this to happen, two conditions must be satified. First, most of the sightlines from the SMBHmustbecoveredwithdiffusemedium. Second,thewindcannotcoolefficiently. As the wind hits the ISM, it shocks and heats to T ∼ 1011 K. At this temperature, the most efficient cooling process is inverse Compton scattering of the photons in the AGNradiationfield(Ciotti&Ostriker1997). Theefficiencyofthisprocessdropswith increasing shock radius, thus the cooling timescale increases as R2. Since the outflow velocity does not depend strongly on radius (King 2010; Kingetal. 2011), the flow timescaleonlyincreasesasR. Therefore,thereisacriticalradius,R ∼ 1kpc,within cool whichtheshockcanbecooledefficiently,whereasoutsidemostofitsenergyisretained andtransferredtotheoutflow. Thetwocasesarecalledmomentum–drivenandenergy– drivenflows,respectively; theirsalientfeaturesareshownschematically inFigure1. 3.1. Momentum–drivenoutflow Anefficientlycooledshockedwindgasiscompressedtohighdensityandradiatesaway almostallofitsoriginalkineticenergy, retainingandcommunicating onlyitspressure, whichisequaltothepre–shock rampressure P˙ ≃ L /c ∝ M,tothehostISM. w Edd For an isothermal ISM density distribution with velocity dispersion σ and gas fraction f (the ratio of gas density to background potential density) the behaviour of c theflowdepends ontheblackholemass M (King2003,2010). For M < M ,where σ f κ M = c σ4 ≃ 4×108M σ4 , (3) σ πG2 ⊙ 200 with f = 0.16 and σ = σ/(200 kms−1), the wind momentum is too weak to drive c 200 awaytheswept–upISM,andtheflowstalls. ForM > M thewinddrivestheswept–up σ ISM far from the nucleus, quenching its owngas supply and further accretion. There- fore, M represents an approximate upper limit to the SMBH mass distribution (see σ Poweretal. 2011, for more details). The calculated mass is very similar to that ob- tainedfromobservations ofthe M−σrelation, despite havingnofreeparameter. 3 Figure1. SchematicpictureofAGNoutflows. A windwith v ∼ 0.1c)impacts w theISMofthehostgalaxy,producingashockoneithersideofthecontactdisconti- nuity. Within∼1kpcofthenucleus(top),theshockscoolrapidlyandradiateaway mostoftheirenergy,leadingtooutflowkineticenergy∼ (σ/c)L . Inanenergy– Edd drivenoutflow(bottom),the shockedregionsexpandadiabatically,communicating mostofthekineticenergyofthewindtotheoutflow,whichisthenabletosweepthe galaxyclearofgas. 3.2. Energy–driven outflow Alarge–scale (& 1kpc)outflowbecomesenergydriven. Itisessentially adiabatic, and has the wind energy rate, i.e. E˙ ≃ E˙ ∼ 0.05L (from Equation 2). The hot bub- out w Edd ble’sthermalexpansion makesthedrivingintothehostISMmorevigorous thaninthe momentum–driven case. Observed galaxy–wide molecular outflows must be energy– driven, as demonstrated directly by their kinetic energy content (cf. Equation 2). The adiabatic expansion oftheshocked windpushes theswept–up interstellar mediumina ‘snowplow’. In Kingetal. (2011) wederive the analytic solution for the expansion of the shocked wind in a galaxy bulge with an isothermal mass distribution. With AGN luminosity lL ,allsuchsolutions tendtoanattractor Edd 1/3 2ηlf R˙ = v ≃ cσ2c ≃ 925σ2/3(lf /f )1/3 kms−1 (4) e " 3f # 200 c g g 4 KastytisZubovas,AndrewR.King untiltheAGNswitchesoffwhentheshockisatsomeradiusR = R . Subsequently, the 0 expansion speeddecayswith x = R/R ≥ 1as 0 10 1 2 10 R˙2 = 3 v2+ σ2 − − σ2. (5) (cid:18) e 3 (cid:19)(cid:18)x2 3x3(cid:19) 3 In Eq. (4), the current gas fraction f may be lower than f (cf. Eq. 3). The outflow g c persists for an order of magnitude longer than the duration of the quasar outburst that is driving it, and reaches radii of 104 − 105 pc. It is evident that energy–driven out- flowsarecapableofsweepinggasoutofgalaxies,quenchingfurtherstarformationand establishing theSMBH–bulgemassrelationship (Poweretal.2011). 3.3. Observableoutflowparameters The solutions (4, 5) describe the motion of the contact discontinuity see Figure 1). Outflows are usually observed in molecular gas, which is embedded in the outflowing shell(seeZubovas&King2012,formoredetails), whichmoveswithvelocity γ+1 lf 1/3 v = R˙ ≃ 1230σ2/3 c kms−1 (6) out 2 200 f ! g fromadiabatic shockconditions, usingγ = 5/3,andthemassoutflowrateis dM(R ) (γ+1)f σ2 η(γ+1) f R˙c M˙ = out = g R˙ = g M˙ , (7) out dt G 4 f σ2 Edd c assuming M = M . If the AGNluminosity is still close to Eddington and f = f , the σ g c massloadingfactor(f ≡ M˙ /M˙ )andmassoutflowratesare L out Edd 2ηc 4/3 f 2/3 l1/3 l1/3 f = g ≃ 460σ−4/3 ; M˙ ≃ 3700σ8/3l1/3 M yr−1. (8) L 3σ! f ! m˙ 200 m˙ out 200 ⊙ c Ifthecentralquasarisnolongeractive, M˙ islowerbyR˙/v ,withR˙ givenbyEq. (5). out e One can show from Equations (6) and (8) that M˙ v2 /2 ≃ 0.05L , i.e. most out out Edd of the wind kinetic energy istransferred to the outflow, asexpected for energy driving (more precisely, while the quasar is active, the outflow contains 2/3rds of the total energy). WecanalsoderiveanexpressionforthemomentumflowrateP˙ intheoutflow: L L P˙ = Edd f1/2 ∼ 20σ−2/3l1/6 Edd. (9) out c L 200 c 4. Discussion Weseethatinprinciple,large–scalewide–angleoutflowsdrivenbyamildlyrelativistic wind launched by the AGN radiation pressure can sweep galaxies clear of gas. The observableproperties ofsuchoutflowsaretypicalvelocitiesv ∼ 1000−1500kms−1 out and mass flow rates up to M˙ ∼ 4000 M yr−1 (Equations (6) and(8)). The outflows out ⊙ should have mechanical luminosities E˙ ∼ (η/2)L ∼ 0.05L , but (scalar) mo- out Edd Edd mentumrates P˙ ∼ 20L /c,consistent withobservations (seeTable1). out Edd 5 Table1. Outflowparameters:observationversuspredictionforasampleofAGN Object M˙ v E˙out M˙outvoutc f M˙ v f out out 0.05Lbol Lbol L pred. pred. L,pred. Mrk231(a) 420 1100 0.66 18 490 880 810 840 Mrk231(b) 700 750 0.51 20 820 880 810 840 Mrk231(c) 1200 1200 1.0 25 1400 1150 1060 1110 IRAS08572+3915(c) 970 1260 2.1 50 1200 950 875 910 IRAS13120–5453(c) 130 860 0.88 31 1080 220 610 1870 Firsttwocolumns: observedmassflowrate(inM yr−1)andvelocity(inkms−1)oflarge–scale ⊙ outflows in molecular (Mrk231, IRAS 08572+3915 and IRAS 13120–5453) and warm ionised gas(Mrk1157). Middlethreecolumns: quantitiesderivedfromobservations. Lastthreecolumns: massflowrate,velocityandmassloadingfactorderivedfromourequations(6)and(8).Allderived quantitiesshowgoodagreementwiththoseobservedandwitheachother. References:a-Rupke&Veilleux(2011);b-Feruglioetal.(2010);c-Sturmetal.(2011). Such outflows leave several observable signatures. Cold gas clumps entrained within the shell produce the observed molecular emission. The inner wind shock ac- celerates cosmic ray particles, which can emit synchrotron radiation in the radio band and produce gamma rays when interacting with the ISM. These signatures resemble those of the gamma–ray emitting bubbles in our Galaxy recently discovered by Fermi (Suetal.2010),whichcanbeexplainedasrelicsofashortquasaroutburstabout6Myr ago(Zubovasetal.2011,alsothecontribution byZubovastothisvolume). Acknowledgments. We thank the conference organizers for their hospitality. Re- search in theoretical astrophysics atLeicester is supported byan STFCRolling Grant. KZissupported byanSTFCresearchstudentship. References CiottiL.,OstrikerJ.P.,1997,ApJ,487,L105+ FeruglioC.,MaiolinoR.,PiconcelliE.,etal.2010,A&A,518,L155+ Ha¨ringN.,RixH.-W.,2004,ApJ,604,L89 KingA.,2003,ApJ,596,L27 KingA.R.,2010,MNRAS,402,1516 KingA.R.,PoundsK.A.,2003,MNRAS,345,657 KingA.R.,ZubovasK.,PowerC.,2011,MNRAS,ppL263+ PoundsK.A.,KingA.R.,PageK.L.,O’BrienP.T.,2003,MNRAS,346,1025 PoundsK.A.,ReevesJ.N.,KingA.R.,etal.2003,MNRAS,345,705 PowerC.,ZubovasK.,NayakshinS.,KingA.R.,2011,MNRAS,413,L110 RiffelR.A.,Storchi-BergmannT.,2011a,MNRAS,411,469 RiffelR.A.,Storchi-BergmannT.,2011b,MNRAS,417,2752 RupkeD.S.N.,VeilleuxS.,2011,ApJ,729,L27+ SturmE.,Gonza´lez-AlfonsoE.,VeilleuxS.,etal.2011,ApJ,733,L16+ SuM.,SlatyerT.R.,FinkbeinerD.P.,2010,ApJ,724,1044 TombesiF.,CappiM.,ReevesJ.N.,etal.2010,A&A,521,A57+ TombesiF.,SambrunaR.M.,ReevesJ.N.,etal.2010,ApJ,719,700 ZubovasK.,KingA.R.,2012,ArXive-prints ZubovasK.,KingA.R.,NayakshinS.,2011,MNRAS,415,L21

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.