RHODORA, Vol. 98, No. 893, 94-98, 1996 pp. NEW ENGLAND NOTE A FLORA OF THE VASCULAR AND NON-VASCULAR PLANTS OF NANTUCKET, TUCKERNUCK, AND MUSKEGET ISLANDS PniER W. DUNWIDDIE Audubon Massachusetts Society, Lost Farm, Hummock Pond Rd., Nantucket, Massachusetts 02554 The Current Address: Nature Conservancy, 217 Pine Washington 98101 St., Suite 1100, Seattle, Bruce A. Sorrie Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, MA Westboro, 0158T West Current Address: 160 Rliode Island Ave., Southern Pines, North 28387 Carolina Nantucket has been recognized widely as a botanical "hotspot'' with one of the greatest concentrations of species Massa- rare in A well-known chusetts. host of 19th century botanists forayed on Many the island in search of unusual material. of their collec- The tions are intriguing. recorded plant specimen from still first Nantucket dates from 1827, when Thomas A. Greene of New Bed- made ford a collection of slender marsh-pink {Sahatia ccmipanii- Two lata) from the island. years James W. Robbins Po- later, (of made tcntilla rohhiiisiana fame) a second collection of the same species from Greene's moist hollows site ''in in Scjuam.'' Interest known species continues be keen Massachu- in this to as in is it setts only from two sites on Cape Cod and Nantucket. was to It be the first in a long line of notable records to come from Nan- Another made tucket. of the early collections on was the island seabeach amaranth {Aniarcuithus puDiilus), collected by Ol- S. T. ney 1849. has not been seen again in It in the state. Owen Maria In 1888, published a flora of the island that in- cluded over 600 Her was by no means species. list definitive, but was one of the floras published for any county Massa- it first in Eugene chusetts. Bicknell produced most work P. the definitive on Nantucket the flora with his *Terns and Flowering Plants of Nantucket/' published in a series of installments between 1908 and 1919 Now, in the Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. nearly we eight decades have compiled comprehensive later, a flora that upon work builds the of these and Dun- earlier botanists (Sorrie widdie Dunwiddie and 1996; Sorrie 1996). 94 New England Note 95 I996J Our somewhat and broader both geographically taxo- ITora is Nan- nomically than earlier works. In addition to the island of we have included records from the other two vegetated tucket, Our Nantucket County, Muskeget and Tuckernuck. islands in work also includes lichens, mosses, and other bryophyte records. common The and names and published flora includes scientific synonymy for each species, as well as habitat and abundance in- on formation, state ranks for rare species, data origin (native ver- sus introduced), and notations for potentially invasive species. The flora also available in a computerized relational database. is above This database contains of the information, addition in all noting form shrub, graminoid, duration to fields life (tree, etc.), own (annual, biennial, or perennial), records of our collections and sightings, and notations indicating which previous authors reported a Nantucket occurrence for a species. ctlso Our includes of 1265 vascular taxa, including spe- flora a total subspecies, and hybrids. Thirty-nine percent (489) cies, varieties, were introduced to the island. This compares to the total of 1136 Due reported by Bicknell, 33 percent of which were non-native. we taxonomic revisions and re-annotations of specimens, cur- to The number rently accept 982 of Bicknell's records in our flora. of species high, with 23 endangered, 13 threatened, 15 spe- rare is Mas- cial concern, 46 watch and 7 historical, according to the list, sachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (1992). The non-vascular flora comprises 79 mosses, 19 liver- hornwort, and 99 worts, lichens. 1 some by Nantucket has received of the greatest scrutiny bota- As nists of any area of similar size (ca. 14,000 ha) in the state. an example of one of the most completely inventoried regional examine what valuable deficiencies therefore, to re- floras, is it main our knowledge of Nantucket species' occurrence and dis- in From may drawn such an analysis, inferences be regard- tribution. many ing the thoroughness of our understanding of the less New England. intensively studied areas in Currency Three hundred and twenty-six species, of records. have been recorded over 60 over one-quarter of the flora, not in many years. This partially reflects the predilections of recent bota- ourselves included, to scour natural habitats for unusual nists, weed and back waste dumps, and records, to ignore the yards, lots of the island. Yet nearly half of this total (153) includes na- many from tive species, of which are not weedy. Their absence 96 Rhodora 98 [Vol. may recent not be due to inadequate searcliing appropri- lists in ate habitats. Number Many of species have been found only on rarely sites. Nantucket. Bicknell noted that ahnost one-third of the flora (352 species: 182 native, 170 introduced) was recorded from only 1-3 A comparable from sites. statistic not available our database, is and will be the focus of future work. However, our impression is number that this has not declined greatly. About two-thirds of the we 326 species for which have no recent record (>60 years) fall many known group, into this ^ind other currcnlly rare species are only from same where the sites earlier botanists reported them. Lone may occurrences of non-native taxa reflect chance introduc- tions of plants become permanently and that failed to established may no The longer be present. abundance of native species with few many may records suggests have extremely that limited dis- may on tributions Nantucket, and be particularly susceptible to Examples extirpation. include Gaultheria Schwxilbea hispiclula, americana, Botrychium and Cornus simplex, anioniuNL Completeness of inventory. impossible determine to Ti is whether every species occurring on an island the size of Nan- tucket (ca. 30,000 acres) has been found. Furthermore, the total always changing new become as species are introduced and is naturalized, and others disappear from One approach the island. to assessing the thoroughness of our inventory examine to the is number new of species observations recent decades. Based on in M work from 1958 his to new reported about 50 taxa to the island, 9 of which were native. Since beginning our work on names the island in 1980, about 60 have been added Nantucket to the vascular plant flora that previ- were ously not recorded; half of these were While some native. of these native species represented taxonomic changes had that when not been recognized compilations Nantucket earlier of the were flora prepared, others were undoubtedly species simply that had been overlooked by previous on botanists the island. Examples include Scleria pauciflora caroUniana, Amphi- var. carpiim purshii. Aster acuniinatus, Polysdchuni acrostichoides, and Aniekinchier arhorea. Our results suggest that even within a relatively small and many heavily botanized area such as Nantucket, questions remain unanswered regarding the nature of the local flora. Several points may worth are considering as they apply elsewhere. New England Note 97 1996] Despite over a century and a half of extensive study, additional 1) new These species continue to be found. include species to the common island that are elsewhere, as well as species that are rare regionally. A number known from few large of species are only a Ef- 2) sites. made forts should be to identify which of these are truly limited distribution and not merely undercollected. Measures then can in be taken to protect sites of locally rare taxa to prevent their ex- tirpation. Our knowledge much may of of the current flora be woefully 3) dated. The preparation and maintenance of large, private herbaria by serious amateurs as well as professionals was relatively wide- spread the turn of the century. This practice virtually has disap- at As much peared. a of our information on the presence and result, many many distributions of species out of date by decades. is Recent work often conducted by professionals employed by 4) is who conservation organizations and agencies focus primarily on rare native species. The tendency to overlook other components of non-native leaves conspicuous the flora, particularly taxa, gaps our knowledge of local and regional plant geography. in ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. The produc- tion and publication of the Nantucket flora represent a coopera- Audubon by Massachusetts Massachusetts tive effort the Society, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association, and The Nature Conservancy. Ken- much dra Buresch and Carol Moffitt assisted with of the docu- ment research, data input, and editorial portions of this project. own and In addition to the support of our organizations the co- who we work sponsors helped bring this together, are especially Cox grateful for the generosity of the Foundation, Inc. for fund- and ing this project. Copies of the flora are available to libraries The com- serious researchers free of charge while supplies last. on two puter database also available 3.5 inch diskettes. is LITERATURE C:'ITED BiCKNELL, E. 1908-1919. Ferns and flowering plants of Nantucket. Bull. Torrey P. Bot. Club 35: 49-62, 181-201, 471^98; 36: 1-29, 441-456; 37: 51-72; 38: 69-80, 103-133, 447^60; 39: 415^28, 605-624; 41: 27^7, 71-87, 331-347, 423^40. 411-427; 42: 265-276, 549-570; 44: 365-369, 383-387; 46: A AND DUNWIDDIE, W. B. A. SoRRiF. 1996. computerized database of vascular P. and non-vascular plants from Nantucket. Tuckernuck, and Muskeget Islands. Massachusetts Audubon Society, Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endan- 98 Rhodora IVoL 98 gered Species Program, Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association, and The Nature Conservancy. MacKeevf.R, C. 1968. Native and Naturalized Plants of Nantucket. University F. MA. of Massachusetts Press. Anilierst. MaSSACHUSFTTS N/VrURAL AND ENDANdi-RI-D ProCIRAM. IlHRriAGl^ 1992. vSl'IXlHS Massachusetts of endangered, threatened, and special concern species. Bos- list MA. ton, A OwFN, M. L. 188H, Catalogue of Plants Growing Without Cultivation in the MA. County of Nantucket, Massachusetts. Gazette Priming Co., Northampton, AND SoRRii-, R. A. W. DuNWiDoin. 1996, The Vascular and Non- Vascular Flora P. of Nantucket, Tuckernuck, and Muskcgel Islands. Massachusetts Audubon So- Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Nan- ciety, tucket Maria Mitchell Association, and The Nature Conservancy. Nantucket. MA.