ebook img

4ashington Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 mF-$0.76 HC - Eric PDF

35 Pages·2011·1.14 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview 4ashington Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 mF-$0.76 HC - Eric

DOCUMFNT RESUME TB 004 285 ED 103 454 Jacobs, T. O. AUTHOR Developing Questionnaire Items: How to Do It Nell. TITLE Alexandria, Human Resources Research Organization, INSTITUTION Va. 74 PUB DATE NOTE 360. Human Resources Research Organization, 300 N. AVAILABLE FROM 4ashington Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 ($2.45) mF-$0.76 HC Not Available from EDRS. PLUS POSTAGE EDRS PRICE Attitudes; Attitude Tests; Decision Making; *Guides; DESCRIPTORS Interviews; Management; Opinions; *Questionnaires; Surveys; *Test Construction ABSTRACT Questionnaires are prepared by many people who have experience.in survey techniques. not had specialized training an3 nonspecialists in the This booklet was prepared to assist such providing a preparation of efficient and useful questionnaires by vestioas for management brief, readable guide for the development of with kinds of decisions. This discussion is concerned primarily and opinions. The questions that elicit information about attitudes examine th,t. first step in developing a good questionnaire is to questionnaire will be context in which the data derived from the chatacteristicb of the used. The kinds of decisions to be made, the the information are respondents, and the needs of those requesting formats such as important contextual aspects. Secondly, item multiple choice open-ended questions, two-way questions, and the problems inherent questions must be considered along with some of designed and selected for in using the various item types. The items unambiguous, appropriate fur inclusion in the questionnaire should be the questionnaire the respondents, and not misleading. Pretesting worded items can affords a situation in which ineffective or poorly presented for accomplishing be discarded or modified. Suggestions are each phase of questionnaire design. (EH) co BEST 11 AVAILABLE TH.S 'I lem,NsiON 70 RE PW0Out.F BY MICRO WOE li,AL OPYY.togit PARTMEN? Oi HEALTH US FICHE ONLY HAS Pf f N 4RAN?F EoucATION&INELFARE NATIONAL INST;TuTE OP id Uirk'Y EDUCATION HAS BEEN 1,7E0,00 OPERA? f. l &NO OPOANIZA? IONS AS eE CE.Iit D ;DOM t Ft F %At, F THE NIA N, 040E4 ACyNTEYENTS ware PI FiSCosi Ole 0(0:AN,ZA ION t.)Y,O,Pv E DuCAT 01 vF IN Cie OP114.01.0, Pl./00S ""AL '1/2S717101 ?HI Fa NE pRoDue: T ION OL/ ?SIDE 0 ,TATS LI CIO NOT 1.4Et ED'ARgr REPWE PERMS ?HE E4.0 kvS7EM CiauiRES of. ,c AL IvAtokA 45T Tott con. or ?tit cOPYia.coir OWNER ,on, pos,,,t1N SAM C V F Developing Questionnaire Items: How To Do It Well T.O. Jacobs HumRRO ORGANIZATION HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH 2/3 .10, 1974 0 Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO) 300 North Washington Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Reproduction in whole or in part permitted for any purpose of the U.S. Government FOrifEWORD decisions are often made Policy, purchase, and other management other students, workers, teachers, or using information from consumers, relevant experience. tryout or other, longer-term groups with experimental directed to a from a written questionnaire Usually such information comes sample of the group. people who have not had Questionnaires are prepared by many techniques. This booklet was specialized training and experience in survey efficient and in the preparation of prepared to assist such nonspecialists for the develop- providing a brief, readable guide useful questionnaires by decisions (questions for achievement or ment of questions for management booklet). not considered in this other tests for individual assessment are No. 4, work done at HumRRO Division This material is based upon under research program performed Columbus, Georgia, as part of a presented in a of the Army. That work was contract to the Department HumRRO Army use, and issued as a booklet specifically prepared for Items, Questionnaire Product, A Guide for Developing Research Ja...uary 1970. Meredith P. Crawford President Organization Human Resources Research O CONTENTS Page 3 INTRODUCTION ASK YOURSELF Section I 5 1. Who needs the information? 5 information? 2. What decision will be made based on your 5 3. What facts will affect the decision? 6 4. Whom are you asking? 8 5. What are the consequences of a wrong answer? 9 Section. II QUESTION TYPES 9 OpenEnded Questions 11 Two-t.Vay Questions 13 Mu It: ple-Choice Questions 16 . Section III FRAMING THE QUESTIONS .. 16 of the Question Development The Initial 26 Pretesting the Questionnaire 28 A CHECK LIST Section 28 A. The Foundation 28 B. The Question Type 30 C. Writing Questions 'go a. Developing Questionnaire Items: Now To Do It Well 7 or 4 111111 I N T 1 ask questions. of this booklet is to talk about how to 4- The purpose object is to ask the right question, This is not as easy as it sounds. The what you need in such a way ihnt, you will find out and to ask it to know. questions. Not all of them There are a great many pitfalls in iasking deal mainly with the will be considered here. Further, this discussion 'will from a person or try to kinds of questions that try to get information somethingfor example, what was find out how he or she feels about how a person feels about learned in a trial of new office equipment, or rules for how best to ask volunteering for military service. There are will also apply to the kind of this kind of question. Many of these rules of instructionthat is, an achievement test that is given after a course the problems and testbut no attempt will be made to cover all that kind of test. techniques that are important in developing zit the principal sample of researchers what they saw as Payne' asked a the following results: problems with research methods. He reported 74% Improperly worded questionnaires 58% Faulty interpretation 52% Inadequacy of samples 44% Improper statistical methods data 41% Presentation of results without supporting tr. be the largest part So, thik booklet will concentrate on what seems questions. This is not the total solution to of the problemwriting good would but, as three experts-in every four all research criticisms mentioned, direction:. indicate, it is a good start in the right Princeton University Press, 'Stanley L. Payne. The /1,1 of Asktng Questions. Princeton, N.J., 1951. 14. Four Sections, including a final statement summarizing thtl main "working suggerions," will follow this introduction: Section I: Certain kinds of questions you would ask yourself when formu- a questionnaire. This to lating is make sure that you know What you are asking about. Section II: A discussio- of types of questions, togethtr wi i:?ir relative advantages and disad .ages. Some types of questions can do certain kinds of things well but do other things fairly poorly. of the III.: A discussion Section actual steps in building a question. naire, including some reasonably well tested do's and don'ts. Section IV: A check that will list help avoid many of the problems involved in writing good questions. 9 4 Satin I MK Y SELF daysif is almost a sacred cow these Th:. phrase "systems npproach" There is approach," it can't be all bad. anything is done using a "systems asking questions, Asking taking a systems approach to some merit to far moi. will lay the foundation for a yourself the following five questions could otherwise produce. vtluable questionnaire than you 1. Whfy :seeds the information? it. may is so straightforwtrd, that The reason for asking this question overlooked, and a lot However, it is a factor that can be seem trivial. machinery for transmitting communi depends on it. Organizations have a in the applied structure. The term usually cations within their own for the of command." The requirement military, for example, is "chain three collect may have come from two or information you are gbing to the coin something may have been lost in levels abdve your own, find munication process. about, and things you must be sure At any rate, there are certain the event will provide you a source in knowing who needs the information This leads to the remaining four questions. you find you cannot answer the next question. based on your information? 2. What decision will be made the information will tell you in part why The answer to this question to the next the foundation for the answers is needed and will lay starts to make a systems approach really question. This is where the kinds decision is going to be made, some difference.' Depending on what will not. difference, and other kinds of information will make a preparing to collect information as a Suppose, for example, you are standard equipment with an old new item of part of a- test comparing a enough. It will be decision to be made is cleat item. The nature of the the old. Also, the equipment or retention of either selection of the new analysis of the will probably he based on an test of the new equipment of such existing of needs. Examination requirements or a statement 5 10 documentationwhy the new equipment is being consideredwill- usually give you a good start for developing your questions. Of course, there are other reasons in which an explicit statement of the impending decision may not lead as easily to a good s:atement of your information needs. However, even in these areas, knowledge of the decision under consideration is an essential key to defining information . . needsthe next step. What facts will affect the decision? As you can see, the art of asking good questions may be closely related to designing good tests..In order to test new equipment well, it is necessary to expose that equipment to the kind of environment and use for which has been designed. This includes useand sometimes it abuseby the type of individual who will use it operationally. When yog need the information for something less straightfcrward than an equipment test, the task of finding out what facts will have a significant bearing on the problem is not always easy and will sometimes be downright difficult. Sometimes the decision maker himself may be unsure of the ftJ range of information that will be needed to make a good decision. In this case, learning what kind of facts will help is part of the proble If this happens, you will find it useful to consult with colleagues, asking, in essence, "What kinds of things would you want to knnw if you had this decision to make?" It will help to make of a list elements of information .fat you feel will be needed as you go. If you have time, you may want to have this list reviewed before .01 you start developing questions. will m the "What information question real Clearly, is, significant difference to the decision maker?" If you collect unn information, or fail to get the needed information, your time will have been put to no good use, at the very least. A considerably more serious possibility is that the decision may get made on the basis of irrelpiant information. This leads to our fourth question. 4. Whom rare you asking? To get good information, not only must you ask a good question, but you also must ask it of someone who has the answer" This ties in 6 Pe

Description:
HE E4.0 kvS7EM CiauiRES PERMS con. or ?tit .. Example 4. Which do yqu prefer, theABC typewriter or is quite possible that the ABC typewriter is both a good typewriter and could be .. Don't use "Alt-American" or "giveaway" words.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.